department of civil, structural & environmental engineering trinity college dublin
DESCRIPTION
Characterisation of surface water runoff from an urban residential sewer separation scheme Dave Morgan, Paul Johnston and Laurence Gill Trinity College Dublin Phil Collins HRD Technologies Ltd Kwabena Osei Hydro International [email protected]. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Characterisation of surface water runoff from an urban residential sewer separation scheme
Dave Morgan, Paul Johnston and Laurence GillTrinity College DublinPhil CollinsHRD Technologies LtdKwabena Osei Hydro International
Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental EngineeringTrinity College Dublin
Motivation CatchmentIntroduction
Considerable research conducted on source-area or end of pipe solids characterisation and modelling..... but SS prediction still a challenging proposition
Can the consideration of a system mass balance:-Improve prediction of suspended solids and associated pollutants in the runoff-Inform SuDS retrofit
Mb
Msew
Mg
Mhs
Mout
Mwo
Mwo = Mg + Msew + Mhs + Mout
Methodology-Field monitoring of small urban residential catchment (18 months)-Characterisation of sediment (loadings / PSD / TP / Cu / Pb / Zn)-Modelling of the suspended solids
RG
HDVS
Separate Pipe and Gully System
Project Outline CatchmentIntroduction
River Poddle22
5∅
225∅450∅
225∅
Stormwater sampling
ComparisonRunoffGullySediment yield
Zone 1
Build-up rates
0.5 – 10.5 g/m2/day
(bitmac road)
~ 0.05 g/m2/day
(concrete footpath)
Particle size
D50 = 1200µm
10% < 200µm
Washoff
ComparisonRunoffWashoffSediment yield
1
3
5
7
9
6
8
104
2
Gully sediment characteristics
Annual accumulation of 36kg
(10 gullies, 30% of imp. area)
D50 =1000µm
13% < 200µm
Gully
ComparisonRunoffWashoff GullySediment yield
SSC
-19 events/231 discrete samples - 30% of
annual runoff volume
-Site median EMC = 29mg/l
-Total mass: 40kg
PSD
-D50 = 34 microns
-90% < 200µm
ComparisonRunoffWashoff GullySediment yield
>80002000-8000
600-2000
212-600
63-212
<63
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Gully Suspended solids
Particle size (microns)
Sedi
men
t m
ass (
kg)
TP Cu Pb Zn0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100GullySuspended solids
Pol
luta
nt m
ass (
g)
Conclusions
Gullies ineffective in trapping < 200 µm particles
2 – 4 times higher annual pollutant load in SS compared to gully sediments
High uncertainty in source loading rates – modelling of SS washoff required to determine mass balance
Thanks for listening....
Current work
Modelling of suspended solids at the outlet
Partitioning of easily eroded and stable solids fractions