department of civil, structural & environmental engineering trinity college dublin

8
Characterisation of surface water runoff from an urban residential sewer separation scheme Dave Morgan, Paul Johnston and Laurence Gill Trinity College Dublin Phil Collins HRD Technologies Ltd Kwabena Osei Hydro International [email protected] Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering Trinity College Dublin

Upload: nevan

Post on 23-Feb-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Characterisation of surface water runoff from an urban residential sewer separation scheme Dave Morgan, Paul Johnston and Laurence Gill Trinity College Dublin Phil Collins HRD Technologies Ltd Kwabena Osei Hydro International [email protected]. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering Trinity College Dublin

Characterisation of surface water runoff from an urban residential sewer separation scheme

Dave Morgan, Paul Johnston and Laurence GillTrinity College DublinPhil CollinsHRD Technologies LtdKwabena Osei Hydro International

[email protected]

Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental EngineeringTrinity College Dublin

Page 2: Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering Trinity College Dublin

Motivation CatchmentIntroduction

Considerable research conducted on source-area or end of pipe solids characterisation and modelling..... but SS prediction still a challenging proposition

Can the consideration of a system mass balance:-Improve prediction of suspended solids and associated pollutants in the runoff-Inform SuDS retrofit

Mb

Msew

Mg

Mhs

Mout

Mwo

Mwo = Mg + Msew + Mhs + Mout

Methodology-Field monitoring of small urban residential catchment (18 months)-Characterisation of sediment (loadings / PSD / TP / Cu / Pb / Zn)-Modelling of the suspended solids

RG

HDVS

Separate Pipe and Gully System

Page 3: Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering Trinity College Dublin

Project Outline CatchmentIntroduction

River Poddle22

5∅

225∅450∅

225∅

Stormwater sampling

Page 4: Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering Trinity College Dublin

ComparisonRunoffGullySediment yield

Zone 1

Build-up rates

0.5 – 10.5 g/m2/day

(bitmac road)

~ 0.05 g/m2/day

(concrete footpath)

Particle size

D50 = 1200µm

10% < 200µm

Washoff

Page 5: Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering Trinity College Dublin

ComparisonRunoffWashoffSediment yield

1

3

5

7

9

6

8

104

2

Gully sediment characteristics

Annual accumulation of 36kg

(10 gullies, 30% of imp. area)

D50 =1000µm

13% < 200µm

Gully

Page 6: Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering Trinity College Dublin

ComparisonRunoffWashoff GullySediment yield

SSC

-19 events/231 discrete samples - 30% of

annual runoff volume

-Site median EMC = 29mg/l

-Total mass: 40kg

PSD

-D50 = 34 microns

-90% < 200µm

Page 7: Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering Trinity College Dublin

ComparisonRunoffWashoff GullySediment yield

>80002000-8000

600-2000

212-600

63-212

<63

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Gully Suspended solids

Particle size (microns)

Sedi

men

t m

ass (

kg)

TP Cu Pb Zn0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100GullySuspended solids

Pol

luta

nt m

ass (

g)

Page 8: Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering Trinity College Dublin

Conclusions

Gullies ineffective in trapping < 200 µm particles

2 – 4 times higher annual pollutant load in SS compared to gully sediments

High uncertainty in source loading rates – modelling of SS washoff required to determine mass balance

Thanks for listening....

Current work

Modelling of suspended solids at the outlet

Partitioning of easily eroded and stable solids fractions