delviro energy titan 160w led high bay vs. philips fbx 160w

1
Delviro TITAN 160W LED Added Value Versus Philips FBX16 Brand Luminaire Warranty (years) Light Output (lumens) Efficacy (lm/W) Wattage LM Rating at Lifetime CCT (K) CRI 10 Years Cost of Ownership (maintenance and waste costs) Delviro TITAN HB 160 10 20,048 126.1 159W L70=200,000hrs. 5047 83.81 10 Year Warranty includes the LED driver making the TITAN HB the most secure lighting investment for the long-term. Philips FBX16 5 14,843 84.1 177W L70=100,000hrs. 5000 80.00 Unknown; how many LED driver failures or LED engine failures will occur after the 5 Year Warranty elapses? Key Points to Consider: + Delviro TITAN HB 160 is featuring the latest generation LED chip technology from our LED technology Partner Samsung with over 200,000hrs. life expectancy at LM-70, and with LM-90 sustained at 103,000hrs. TITAN HB 160 offers 2x longer LM-70 rated life compared to Philips FBX16 . + Cost of ownership of the Philips FBX16 luminaire is significantly increased after 5 Year Warranty. Using the Philips FBX16 luminaire the client may incur unexpected costs due to Philips FBX lighting system failures "outside of their 5 Year Warranty"; these are maintenance/labor and waste costs to be incurred by the customer after 5 Years. + Delviro Energy's standard 10 Year Warranty (including the driver ) offers greater peace of mind to the customer for the long-term. + TITAN HB 160 is producing a greater CRI compared to the Philips FBX16; TITAN HB 160 can be supplied with +85 CRI (making perceived light output even greater). + Energy consumption of TITAN HB is 159W compared to the Philips FBX16 consuming 177W; TITAN HB 160 being more energy efficient and having a greater efficacy delivers more lumens to the target for less energy used. See example below: 14fc average output for TITAN HB 160 (159W) versus 11fc average for Philips FBX16 (177W). + TITAN HB 160 efficacy is significantly greater (+33%) compared to Philips FBX16 ; i.e. TITAN HB 160 = 126.1lm/W versus Philips FBX16 = 84.1lm/W. + Philips FBX16 uses two (2) drivers! [TITAN 160W uses ONLY one (1)]. 2x the drivers makes the Philips FBX less efficient, and much more costly to maintain, especially after 5 years. + Higher efficacy of TITAN HB means less energy is needed to produce the same lumen output; this means less fixtures are required per project, ensuring the shortest ROI. * Design Lights Consortium (DLC) qualified products listings for TITAN HB 160 and Philips FBX16. Delviro TITAN HB 160, 14fc average lumen output (20ft ceiling) Philips FBX16, 11fc average lumen output (20ft ceiling)

Upload: anthony-borges

Post on 18-Jul-2015

159 views

Category:

Technology


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Delviro Energy TITAN 160W LED high bay vs. Philips FBX 160W

Delviro TITAN 160W LED Added Value Versus Philips FBX16

Brand LuminaireWarranty

(years)

Light

Output (lumens)

Efficacy (lm/W) WattageLM Rating

at LifetimeCCT

(K)CRI

10 Years Cost of Ownership (maintenance and waste costs)

Delviro TITAN HB 160 10 20,048 126.1 159W L70=200,000hrs. 5047 83.81

10 Year Warranty includes the LED driver

making the TITAN HB the most secure lighting

investment for the long-term.

Philips FBX16 5 14,843 84.1 177W L70=100,000hrs. 5000 80.00

Unknown; how many LED driver failures or

LED engine failures will occur after the

5 Year Warranty elapses?

Key Points to Consider:

+ Delviro TITAN HB 160 is featuring the latest generation LED chip technology from our LED technology Partner Samsung with over 200,000hrs. life expectancy at LM-70, and with

LM-90 sustained at 103,000hrs. TITAN HB 160 offers 2x longer LM-70 rated life compared to Philips FBX16.

+ Cost of ownership of the Philips FBX16 luminaire is significantly increased after 5 Year Warranty. Using the Philips FBX16 luminaire the client may incur unexpected costs due to

Philips FBX lighting system failures "outside of their 5 Year Warranty"; these are maintenance/labor and waste costs to be incurred by the customer after 5 Years.

+ Delviro Energy's standard 10 Year Warranty (including the driver ) offers greater peace of mind to the customer for the long-term.

+ TITAN HB 160 is producing a greater CRI compared to the Philips FBX16; TITAN HB 160 can be supplied with +85 CRI (making perceived light output even greater).

+ Energy consumption of TITAN HB is 159W compared to the Philips FBX16 consuming 177W; TITAN HB 160 being more energy efficient and having a greater efficacy

delivers more lumens to the target for less energy used. See example below: 14fc average output for TITAN HB 160 (159W) versus 11fc average for Philips FBX16 (177W).

+ TITAN HB 160 efficacy is significantly greater (+33%) compared to Philips FBX16; i.e. TITAN HB 160 = 126.1lm/W versus Philips FBX16 = 84.1lm/W.

+ Philips FBX16 uses two (2) drivers! [TITAN 160W uses ONLY one (1)]. 2x the drivers makes the Philips FBX less efficient, and much more costly to maintain, especially after 5 years.

+ Higher efficacy of TITAN HB means less energy is needed to produce the same lumen output; this means less fixtures are required per project, ensuring the shortest ROI.

* Design Lights Consortium (DLC) qualified products listings for TITAN HB 160 and Philips FBX16.

Delviro TITAN HB 160, 14fc average lumen output (20ft ceiling) Philips FBX16, 11fc average lumen output (20ft ceiling)