delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world ccs – environmental impacts roger...

16
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world CCS – Environmental Impacts Roger Barrowcliffe, 14 November 2007

Upload: mia-miah-lidster

Post on 14-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

CCS – Environmental Impacts

Roger Barrowcliffe, 14 November 2007

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Distribution of sources and sinks in Europe

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Sources and sinks in NW Europe (2030)

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Opportunities for environmental impact

Fuel extraction

Fuel transport

Power Generation

CO2 transportCO2 storage

Waste products

Emissions

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Fuel – environmental issues

‘Fuel penalty’ has implications for:

• Use of a finite resource

• Socio-economic impacts

• GHG and other emissions

• Occupational risk

Fuel transport has implications for:

• GHG and other emissions

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

CO2 transport/pipelines

Additional pipelines associated with:

• Temporary land take and ecological impact

• Temporary socio – economic impact

• Risk of rupture and consequent hazard

• Energy use through compression

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

EU scale of CO2 capture and storage

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Mass of CO2 captured (MT) by:

Oxyfuel (7%) 0 49 156 338 600

Pre-combustion (IGCC) (64%) 3 437 1,406 3,038 5,397

Post-combustion (PC) (29%) 1 194 625 1,350 2,399

Total (cumulative MtCO2) 4 679 2,187 4,726 8,395

Total length of CO2 transport

pipeline (km)

23 3,159 7,057 11,518 17,029

Annual volume of CO2 captured (MtCO2/yr)

1.0 135.0 301.5 492.2 727.7

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

CO2 storage

• Use of offshore reservoirs associated with risk of:

• Leaks to seawater and effect on ocean pH

• Accidental release at the wellhead

• Onshore reservoirs associated with:

• Leakage, rupture and risk to humans/ecosystems

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Peterhead Power Station (as proposed by BP)

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Peterhead Power Station – the process (1)

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Peterhead Power Station – the process (2)

Hydrogen rich fuel

SyngasReformer

Shift conversion

of CO to CO2

CO2 Capture

Gas turbines and HRSGs

H2O + ½ O2

Pre-Combustion Decarbonisation

CO2

Electric Power

Natural gas

Partial Oxidation:CH4 + ½ O2 = CO + 2H2

&Steam Reforming:

CH4 + H2O = CO + 3H2

Water Gas Shift Conversion:

CO + H2O = CO2 + H2

H2O + NOX and residual CO2

Capture, transport and storage of

CO2Power generation

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Peterhead Power Station – the carbon balance

Natural Gas Fuel In

1231MWh (253.5TCO2/

hr)

Power station: Thermal Efficiency 38.6% (Net/LHV)

CO2 to Atmosphere20.3Tonnes/hr

CO2 to Miller233.2Tonnes/

hr

Electricity Export

475MW (Net)

St Fergus Compression

& Miller Operations

CO2 to Atmosphere19.02TCO2 Miller + St Fergus 5.59TCO2

Total 24.61TCO2/hr

Net CO2

sequestered208.6 T/hr

477 barrels (64 tonnes) of oilRecovered/hr

Assumptions: 92% Capture St Fergus Compression (13MW) (430g CO2/kW) (Reference Case) Miller Platform (92MW for nominal 41MW output at 35% efficiency) (260g CO2/kW UK Ave) Steady state operation profile (Reference Case, Offshore compression requirements based on initial years

of operation)

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Natural Gas Fuel In2.59 kWh (534 gCO2)

Thermal Efficiency38.6% (Net/LHV)

CO2 to Atmosphere43 g

CO2 to Miller491 g

Electricity Export1 kWh (Net)

DF1 Peterhead

• 43 gCO2 (to

atmosphere)/kWh

(92%CO2 capture)

Natural Gas Fuel In1.79 kWh (368 gCO2)

Thermal Efficiency56.0% (Net/LHV)

CO2 to atmosphere368 g

Electricity Export1 kWh (Net)

•368 gCO2/kWh electricity export

UK Current Proven CCGT Technology - (F Class)

Peterhead PS v Current CCGT PS

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Peterhead PS: a comparison with existing electricity generation

876

723

430 404 368 343

43

491

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

gCO2 2 /kWh

net electricity generation

UK AverageCoal

UK AverageOil

UK GridElectricity

Average

E Class CCGT UK ProvenCCGT

Technology - FClass

Baglan Bay - HClass CCGT

Peterhead

Generating Type

CO2 CapturedCO2 to atmosphere

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Super critical coal fired PS – additional emissions (Source: IPCC)

Rate (kg/MWhr) Increase (kg/MW hr)

Atmospheric emissions:

CO2 107 - 704

SO2 0.00 - 0.29

NOx 0.77 0.18

Resource consumption:

Fuel 390 93

Limestone 27.5 6.8

Solid Waste:

Ash 28.1 6.7

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Summary of environmental issues

• Most impacts are modest – but widely distributed

• Some impacts are unknown and constitute risks