dejan komatina, ph.d. civ. eng., secretary, isrbc iwrm in the sava river basin – a basis for...
TRANSCRIPT
Dejan Komatina, Ph.D. Civ. Eng., Secretary, ISRBC
IWRM in the Sava River Basin – a basis for sustainable development
of the region
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 2
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 3
Background
• Framework Agreement on the Sava River Basin (FASRB)
– Signed in 2002, ratified in 2004
– The first multilateral agreement in the region signed after the Agreement on succession
– International Sava River Basin Commission (ISRBC) established in June 2005
– Secretariat of the ISRBC started to work in January 2006
– Provides the ISRBC with the broadest scope of work among European basin organizations (i.e. river commissions)
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 4
Overall objective
Transboundary cooperation for sustainable development of the region
– Issues of sustainability:• Improvement of water quality• Maintenance of water quantity• Protection of aquatic ecosystem• Protection against the harmful effects of water
(due to floods, ice, droughts, accidents)
– Development activities:• Different kinds of water use
(navigation, hydropower generation, water supply, sewerage, irrigation and drainage, fishery, tourism and recreation)
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 5
Structure
• Governmental sector– Officially nominated
national institutions– Other national
institutions
• Non-gov. sector
• Academic sector
• Business sector
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 6
Activities
• Coordination of:
– Development of strategic plans for the Sava River Basin (RBM, FRM)
– Establishment of integrated systems for the Sava River Basin (GIS, RIS, HMIS, FFWS, AEWS)
– Preparation of development programs for the Sava River Basin• Rehabilitation and development of navigation• Development of tourism
– Harmonization of regulation (national EU)
– Creation of additional protocols to the FASRB
• Cooperation / stakeholder involvement / public participation
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 7
Example
• Rehabilitation of the Waterway on the Sava River
– Planning phase (studies, design)
– Technical standards (rules harmonized with EU and UNECE regulation)
– Protocol on prevention of water pollution caused by navigation
– Sava RBM Plan
– Climate Adaptation Plan
– Sediment Management Plan
– Initial phase of the RIS development
3.5 – 9.6 million tonnes
3 - 8 million
5.8 – 15.5 million tonnes 7.8 – 20.8 million tonnes
Sisak Bosanski Brod Brcko Belgrade
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 8
Example
• Rehabilitation of the Waterway on the Sava River
– Joint Statement (ICPDR, DC, ISRBC, and EC)
– Manual on Integrated IWT Planning (EU FP7 PLATINA Project)
– WANDA (SEE TCP Project)
Cruiser “Victor Hugo”, Sisak, June 2010
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 9
Added value
• Key features of the approach
– Cohesive, providing conditions for:• Cooperation of the countries after the conflict• Implementation of joint, basin-wide projects• Harmonization of national regulation, methodologies, procedures …
– Integrated (whole basin; sustainability and development)
– Transparent (public participation)
– Aligned with the EU and UNECE regulation (EU Directives, UNECE Water Convention, ...)
– Subregional (“finer resolution” of results than on a regional scale)
– Pragmatic and practical (offering concrete “products” to the Parties – joint plans, development programs, protocols, harmonized regulation, integrated systems)
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 10
Added value
• Indicators
– Interest in the Sava model• Central Asia (Tajikistan; UNECE)• Europe (Conf. on Conventions on
Int’l Waters; Parl. Assembly of the Council of Europe)
• Mediterranean (Lebanon; GWP-Mediterranean)
– Recognition of the Joint Statement Process
• EU (e.g. in the European Parliament resolution on EU Strategy for the Danube Region)
• Similar processes to be launched in the fields of hydropower and agriculture
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 11
Relevance to EU 2020
• Sustainable growth
– Programs for sustainable development of the region (navigation, tourism)
– Climate change adaptation (two ongoing projects)
– Use of hydropower as a renewable energy source
• Smart growth
– Involvement of academic sector
– Establishment of information systems for the Sava river basin
• Inclusive growth
– Fostering contribution of SMEs to sustainable development of the region
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 12
Key challenges
• Differences between the countries
– Status with respect to EU & eligibility for approaching funds
– Level of economic development (financial resources)
– Organizational structure in decision-making process
– Environmental awareness of the public
• Financing priority projects / strategic studies, establishment of integrated systems
• Resolving conflicts of interests of different users of water (within a country / between countries / climate change)
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 13
Funding of the activities
• Funding of projects from external sources improving steadily (share of the projects funded from international programs / funds increasing)
• Funding for the priority projects needed
• EU Strategy for the Danube Region expected to be an appropriate framework
• Roundtable on fund raising activities for the ISRBC projects (Sarajevo, B&H, 17 May 2011)
• 3rd Meeting of the Parties to the FASRB (Brdo near Kranj, Slovenia, 31 May – 1 June 2011)
WB and EU 2020, Regional Coordination Conf., Brussels, 31 Mar 2011 14
Detailed informationwww.savacommission.org