defraigne ethics conference

Upload: archana-bejju

Post on 08-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    1/37

    Economy, industry, innovation, and

    technical democracyInformation Society: Governance,

    Ethics and Social ConsequencesNamur May 22, 2006

    Philippe DefraigneCullen International

    [email protected]

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    2/37

    The ethical firm? Tony Vandeputte (LLB May 20, 2006)

    Ethical firm defined as oftening the negative effects ofglobalisation beyond what is requested by regulation

    The role of a company is not to make up for the statesshortcomings

    The sole role of a company is to create wealth

    Is there room for the ethical firm?

    The firm is ethically neutral but, employees, in particular managers, are facing

    numerous ethical problem

    Above all strike a balance between the interest of thevarious stakeholders.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    3/37

    What is ethics?

    Ethics is not about prohibition

    Ethics is not about risk assessment

    Ethics is not against Economics it concerns its meaning Ethics is about tensions between what exists and what

    should exist

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    4/37

    Le Corbusier: Firminy, 1962-67

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    5/37

    Le Corbusier: la villa Savoie 1931

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    6/37

    Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Hank McKinnell, chairman and CEO, Pfizer, and

    Chairman of the Business Roundtable

    CEOs are increasingly committed to socially responsiblecorporate behaviour because it is essential to

    profitability.

    If were seen by the community as providing goods and services

    that enable people to live a happy, long life, society will want us tosucceed. If they see what were doing in education and sports

    programs, thats important. Otherwise, society will hope that we fail.

    If we continue to be disrespected by the public, it makes us a target.

    People will say regulate them. Excessive regulation is certainlyone of the costs. (New-York Times April 29, 2006)

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    7/37

    Why business cares about society?Self

    regulation

    Regulation

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    8/37

    Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Cadbury Schweppes havedecided to remove sugary beverages from school vending

    machines. (FT May 5, 2006)

    Under threat of regulation and law suits:

    In 2005 Arnold Schwarzenegger had banned soft-drinks vending machines from Californias states schools. A number of Republicans have dropped their oppositionto regulation in the light of growing evidence that obesity isharming productivity and contributing to rising healthcosts.

    17% of US children are clinically obese (up from 14% in1999) !!!

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    9/37

    Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)David Varney, Chairman, mmO2 plc, Chairman, Business in theCommunity (Feb 2004)

    CSR has got to be part of the DNA. It's got to be in the lifeblood ofthe organisation, or it's not going to work.

    Why are we doing these things? Is it because we're interested inprofits? Yes, absolutely. It's our job to make profits. We'd be out of ajob if we didn't.

    We behave responsibly to protect our corporate reputation. If we hada lousy reputation, we wouldn't get customers. But society shouldshare in the profits of our success.CSR is win-win. It's good for us. It's good for the community. It makes

    employees feel motivated about what they're doing. It makescustomers feel good about what they're buying. It makes goodbusiness sense.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    10/37

    Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)David Varneys typology of critics of CSR

    The conservative, free-market view

    Corporate philanthropy essentially means stealing from shareholders.

    Milton Friedman once famously said, the responsibility of corporate

    executives is to stay within the law and to make as much money for theirinvestors as possible. Anything else is harmful to the owners of thebusiness.

    Varneys response

    True CSR does not come free but that's a short-sighted critique.Shareholders are interested in sustainable profitability. Whatever CSRtakes out, it puts back in - in long-term value.A company cannot survive and thrive if it does not look beyond the bottomline. Any shareholder who's interested in sustainable profitability isinterested in all the benefits that CSR can bring.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    11/37

    Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)The leftist view

    CSR is a good thing, but it's not working as well as it should. Needto strengthen it with regulation.

    Varneys response

    A successful approach to social responsibility cannot be achievedwith a regulatory cookie cutter. It has to be indigenous to the cultureof the company.

    Each industry - and each environment - calls for a different approach.

    A one-size-fits-all regulatory system will do far more harm than good.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    12/37

    Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)CSR is hypocritical

    CSR is a smokescreen to hide the truth - mere window dressing ona system that is ruthlessly self-serving.

    The example they often give is the company that claims to be

    socially responsible - while making people redundant.

    Varneys response

    My answer is: this is capitalism!

    In a system such as ours, companies sometimes have to adjusttheir workforce to survive. That's an inevitable outcome of a

    dynamic marketplace. That's its strength. When companiesdownsize to survive, the system produces other opportunities

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    13/37

    Financial capitalismIn the pastIndividuals invested in companies through financial intermediaries

    such as banks

    Today

    10-12 m individuals control half the market capitalisation worldwide.

    Investors allocate directly their capital to firms through the stockmarket. This is known as financial disintermediation.

    It does not mean that every individual trade their shares incompanies themselves but pension funds and insurance companiessimply managed their clients funds for a fee and pass on the gainsand losses. They are not real intermediates as bankers used to be.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    14/37

    Financial capitalism

    Power inside a company has shifted from themanagement to the funds.

    50% of stocks held by funds managers

    United States holds half of the financial assetsworldwide.

    Europe controls 30% including 10% for theUK alone.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    15/37

    Financial capitalismPension funds

    North American: 2/3

    Europe < 15% (incl. 11% for the UK alone).

    Direct consequence of European countries choice to fund pensions on

    a pay as you go basis rather than through the accumulation offinancial assets. Calpers, the pension fund for California civil servantmanages assets worth > $150bn.

    The indirect consequence is that financial markets are dominated byUS fund managers.

    These funds buy all the stocks constituting stock indices such as theDow Jones and then, under the corporate governance banner, weigh

    heavily on management of those companies.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    16/37

    Financial capitalism

    In Ireland, fund managers investing Irelands 15bn National

    Pension Reserve Fund (NPRF) have been told their 2005performance was lacklustre and warned their mandates areunder review. (FT fm March 13, 2006)

    NRPF explained that while their equity performance in 2005

    was in line with its benchmark, our objective was to outperform. Instead, it underperformed the index of Irish pension funds,

    which achieved 21.2% return against the NPRFs 19.6%.

    According to the FT, the pressure the NPRF is putting on its fundmanagers represents continuing evidence that short-term criteriaare applied to portfolios with even very long-term investmenthorizons the NPRF will not distribute any of its assets topensioners before 2025!

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    17/37

    Financial capitalism

    FT notes that although the NPRF is wary of openly criticizing its

    fund managers, Paul Carty, chairman of the commission appointedby the government to over see the fund remarked that some activemanagers have outperformed.

    This was taken as a big hint that some managers had not.

    They know who they are said an official at the NationalTreasury Management Agency, the government agency that

    runs the fund.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    18/37

    Financial capitalism Booz Allen Hamilton survey of CEOs succession 2004

    In 2004, underperforming CEOs were removed after 4.5 years(World average)

    In BAHs judgment, this is an appropriate period. A 15-year vision is

    irrelevant.

    Research shows CEOs need 3 to 5 years to develop their strategiesand see them through to their results.

    CEOs on a short leash tend to become more risk averse and maybe reluctant to embark on riskier projects, such as big investmentsor M&A activity.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    19/37

    Financial capitalism In Europe in particular, the pendulum may already have

    swung too far toward the short term.

    In 2004, CEOs removed for poor performance were inoffice for a median tenure of two and a half years, anastonishingly and counterproductively brief period of

    time. Many of the fundamental changes needed to make

    companies competitive require more than two years to

    take effect, especially given the regions tradition ofcooperative labour relations and the high social costsassociated with transformative change.

    Europe may be entering a cycle in which transformativechange is required

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    20/37

    Financial capitalismIs he still in charge?

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    21/37

    Financial capitalismEurope mad auctions for 3G licences

    20812October 2000Italy

    61850.8August 2000Germany

    1812.7July 24, 2000Netherlands

    62036April 2000UK

    Bid per popin

    Total bids/licence fees in

    bn

    End of theauction

    Country

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    22/37

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    23/37

    Ethics and information societyThe obvious subjects

    Privacy

    Internet and human rights

    Internet governance

    Closed Circuit TV

    etc.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    24/37

    Ethics and information societyCyberspace

    Anybody being potentially connected with anybody anytimeanywhere brings radical changes in the our perception of space(death of distances) and time.

    Human cyborgMITs Media Labs, William Mitchell argues that the advent of mobiledevices and wireless Internet access, digital bits no longer exist in aseparate sphere called cyberspace but have gone on location in the

    real world. The trial separation of bits and atoms is now over.The result is the rise of a human cyborg: a biological coresurrounded by extended, constructed systems of boundaries and

    networks. In this new world, the social ties that exist are no longer

    provided by a continuous home turf; increasingly, my sense ofcontinuity and belonging derives from being electronically networked

    to the widely scattered people and place I care about.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    25/37

    Ethics and information society The network of our friend is increasingly mediated by electronic

    address books in SIM cards, mail browsers and buddy lists.

    Impact on our intersubjectivity: common-sense, shared meaningsconstructed by people in their interactions with each other and usedas an everyday resource to interpret the meaning of elements of

    social and cultural life.

    How to feel responsible for others?

    We need urgently to decipher what this proliferation of newtechnologies will

    do on our brains (why remember things when you have google)

    have on our relationships affect our sexuality

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    26/37

    Why should business care?

    Business as

    usual

    Social

    inclusion -

    sustainability

    Ethics is not a

    barrier to doing

    business it's thefoundation

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    27/37

    ICT EU policy How is ICT seen by the EU?

    ICT industries are one of the main drivers of economicgrowth.

    Their impact on the improved efficiency of othersectors has multiplier effects far greater than the sizeof the industry itself.

    How about expected benefits forICT users?

    Bridge digital divide, lower prices, better quality

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    28/37

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    29/37

    ICT EU policy

    Commissioner Reding appears particularly enthusiasticabout mobile telephony: a natural successor to mobile

    telephony.

    The results of the first pilot projects suggest half of

    European mobile phone subscribers (200 million people)may become mobile TV users.

    In early 2007, the Commission will issue a Communicationon "Strengthening the Internal Market for Mobile TV". It willpropose specific further steps to unlock the potential ofMobile TV.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    30/37

    ICT EU policy

    Radio Frequency Identification Devices (RFID)

    RFID market is expected to grow fast over the next ten

    years.

    Cumulative sales of RFID tags so far amount to 2.4billion, with 600 million tags being sold in 2005 alone!

    The number of tags delivered in 2016 could be over 450times the number delivered in 2006.

    The deployment of RFID technology is expected to make

    a major contribution to growth and jobs.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    31/37

    ICT EU policy

    How the Commission sees its role?

    The Commission believes it is necessary to build across-society consensus on technical, legal andethical issues associated with RFID and to intervene,

    where required, with regulatory instruments. Theissues which need to be addressed include privacy

    The Commission sees that to exploit the economicpotential of RFID, privacy and consumer concernsassociated with the use of RFID tags need to behandled constructively, with the assent of all

    stakeholders.

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    32/37

    Outlook

    The legitimacy of technological innovations requires

    a connection between the technical justifications andthe social ones, to consider their ethical meanings

    and to demonstrate their democratic opportunity.

    Difficult to have a dialogue between intellectuals ofall countries. The complexity of globalisationweakens that dialogue while the simplicity of profit

    maximising strengthens (Peyrelevade).

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    33/37

    OutlookSelf

    regulation

    Regulation

    Business as

    usual

    Social

    inclusion -sustainability

    Ethics as the DNAof business

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    34/37

    The shift to the knowledge societyshould be an opportunity!

    Financial capital Human capital

    Re-humanisation of management

    Scarcity

    abundance

    Growth: quantitative qualitative

    Goods without ethical value goods with ethicalvalueReconnection with sustainability and qualitative

    growthIF

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    35/37

    Change Brussels capital of Europe

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    36/37

    Change Porte de Ninove 2020

  • 8/6/2019 Defraigne Ethics Conference

    37/37

    Porte de Ninove 2040(Projet Joel Claisse Architectures)