defending evictions and terminations from federally

43
Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally- Subsidized Housing Navneet Grewal Western Center on Law and Poverty Lauren DeMartini Bay Area Legal Aid March 2017 (Please switch to polling)

Upload: others

Post on 30-Dec-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Defending Evictions and

Terminations from Federally-

Subsidized Housing

Navneet Grewal

Western Center on Law and Poverty

Lauren DeMartini

Bay Area Legal Aid

March 2017

(Please switch to polling)

Page 2: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Polling Question #1 • How familiar are you with the federally

subsidized housing programs? (i.e. public housing, section 8, etc.)

▫ I know nothing about subsidized housing

▫ I have a little knowledge about some subsidized housing programs

▫ I am very familiar with all or most subsidized housing programs

2

Page 3: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

What We Will Cover

• Types of Subsidized Housing

• How to Identify if Your Client is in Federally Subsidized Housing

• Evictions vs. Voucher Terminations

• Good Cause Requirement in Subsidized Housing

• Notice Requirements

• Defenses

3

Page 4: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

4

Page 5: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Types of Subsidized Housing • Public Housing

• HUD-Subsidized Multifamily

• Project-Based Section 8

• Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8 Voucher)

• Project-Based Voucher

• Low Income Housing Tax Credit

• Other types ▫ HOPWA; Shelter Plus Care; Supportive Housing;

HOME; state and local subsidies

5

Page 6: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

HUD

Housing Authorities

Project-Based Section 8

Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers

Public Housing

Other Subsidies (Rehabilitation, Sec. 236, etc.)

Privately-Owned Buildings

The Government-Funded Housing Family Tree

IRS/CTCAC

LIHTC

Privately-Owned Buildings

Page 7: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher

7

Page 8: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

What Type of Housing is My Client In?

• Extremely low rent?

• Who is the Landlord?

• Lease

• Regulatory/Use agreements

• Is a PHA involved?

• If everything else fails, ask the landlord!

8

Page 9: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

9

(Please switch to polling)

Page 10: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Polling Question #2

• What is your experience representing tenants in subsidized housing?

▫ None

▫ I’ve represented subsidized housing tenants in evictions

▫ I’ve represented subsidized housing tenants in terminations

▫ I’ve represented subsidized housing tenants in both evictions and terminations

10

Page 11: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Eviction v.

Section 8 Voucher Termination

• Evictions:

▫ Public Housing providers, Multifamily housing providers, private landlords leasing to Section 8 voucher holders

• Termination:

▫ A PHA can terminate a participant from the voucher program regardless of whether or not s/he has been evicted from her unit.

11

Page 12: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

12

Page 13: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Voucher Terminations

• Terminations of Housing Choice Vouchers (more commonly known as Section 8 vouchers)

▫ Substantive Grounds for Termination and Defenses

▫ Procedural Protections

13

Page 14: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Eviction and Breach of Lease

• Mandatory termination if family is evicted for serious lease violation. 24 C.F.R. 982.552(b).

• Discretionary termination

▫ for serious or repeated lease violation. 24 C.F.R. 982.551(e).

▫ if family evicted from federally-assisted housing within last five years 24 C.F.R. 982.552(c)(1).

14

Page 15: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

What is a Serious Lease Violation? • Serious violations (24 C.F.R. § 982.310(a)(1))

▫ Include but are not limited to nonpayment of rent or other amounts due under lease

• Minor violations (HUD Handbook 4350.3 8-13). ▫ Late payments ▫ Keeping unauthorized occupants ▫ Failure to pay utilities ▫ Disruptive behavior ▫ Damaging the property ▫ Failure to pay for repairs for damage caused by

tenant

15

Page 16: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Hypo

• The landlord told the PHA that Paula paid her rent 20 days late in February. The landlord also relayed to the PHA that Paula is late on her utility bills. The landlord, however, did not take any actions to evict Paula. If these allegations were true, may the PHA terminate Paula’s assistance?

• Answer: ▫ 24 C.F.R. § 982.310(a)(1)

▫ HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV-1 8-13

▫ Gray v. Allegheny Cnty. Hous. Auth., 8 A.3d 925 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010)

▫ Wilhite v. Scott Cnty. Hous. & Redev. Auth., 759 N.W.2d 252, 256 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009)

16

Page 17: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Other common grounds for

termination • Failure to report changes in income or family

composition

• Failure to cooperate with recertification

• Unauthorized occupants

• Housing Quality Standards breach

• Criminal Activity or Threatening Behavior

• Alcohol Abuse

24 CFR §§982.552, 982.553, 5.100

17

Page 18: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Common Defenses to Termination • Mitigating Factors?

▫ Seriousness of offense

▫ Extent of participation or culpability of individual family members

▫ Mitigating circumstances related to disability

▫ Effects of termination of assistance on other family members who were not involved

• Harmless Violations • Exclusion of Culpable Offender from Household • Reasonable Accommodation • Waiver and Laches • Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)

24 C.F.R. 982.552(c)(2)

18

Page 19: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Hypo • Aunt Marge doesn’t like the crowd her son Bart hangs

around with and is afraid that his antics will eventually get her in trouble with Springfield HA. So Marge asks the PHA to take Bart off her voucher, but the PHA has not acted on the request. Last month, Bart was seen in the neighborhood spray painting graffiti and selling drugs. The PHA moves to terminate Marge’s voucher based on Bart’s criminal activity, prompting Marge to turn to the only lawyer in the family, you. Does Marge have a case?

• Answer: ▫ 24 C.F.R. 982.552(c)(2)

▫ State ex rel. Smith v. Hous. Auth. of St. Louis Cnty., 21 S.W.3d 854 (Mo. App. 2000)

19

Page 20: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Governing Law

• Due Process Clause

• 24 C.F.R. pt. 982

• Administrative law (but CA APA does not apply to terminations by local PHAs)

• Administrative Plan

• Federal APA does not apply

20

Page 21: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Procedural Rights • Written notice of grounds for termination • A notice of right to hearing and deadline to request

hearing • Right to examine and copy any PHA documents

“directly relevant to the hearing.” • Right to be represented at hearing • Right to present evidence and question witnesses • Fair and unbiased hearing officer • Written decision, briefly stating the reasons and

based upon the evidence presented at the hearing. • Look at Administrative Plan 24 C.F.R. 982.555

21

Page 22: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Hypo

• Agatha’s landlord Larry is evicting her for nonpayment of rent. Larry knows about his responsibilities as a Section 8 landlord, so he sends a copy of the notice to the PHA. Upon receiving the eviction notice from Larry, the PHA ceases payments under the HAP contract. Anything wrong with this scenario?

• Answer: ▫ 24 C.F.R. 982.555

▫ DeProfio v. Waltham Hous. Auth., 2007 WL 2367594 (Mass. Super. Ct. July 17, 2007)

22

Page 23: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Evidence

• The PHA must prove the basis for termination by a preponderance of the evidence.

• Judicial rules of evidence do not apply in termination hearings, but participants may challenge the probative value of any evidence offered by the PHA.

• PHA’s exclusive reliance on hearsay evidence may violate Due Process. Margaretta E. Homsey, Procedural Due Process and Hearsay Evidence in Section 8 Housing Voucher Termination Hearings, 51 B.C.L. REV. 517 (2010)

23

Page 24: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Administrative Review

• The PHA can reverse the hearing officer’s termination decision if the hearing officer exceeded his or her authority or if the decision was contrary to HUD regulations or otherwise contrary to federal, state, or local law. 24 C.F.R. § 982.555(f)(1).

24

Page 25: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Judicial Review

• State Law Remedies

▫ Available in some states, including California (writ of mandate CCP § 1094.5)

• Federal Law Remedies

▫ 24 U.S.C. 1983

Due Process

42 U.S.C. 1437d(k)

25

Page 26: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

26

Page 27: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Subsidized Housing:

Good Cause Requirement

• Good cause required: ▫ Public Housing

▫ HUD Multifamily

▫ LIHTC

▫ Shelter Plus Care

▫ HOPWA

▫ Supportive Housing

▫ Continuum of Care

• For Vouchers: ▫ Good cause required during lease term (but at all

times in an eviction controlled jurisdiction).

27

Page 28: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Notice & Procedural Requirements

• Follow state law procedures

• Notice period

• Notice language

• Service requirements

28

Page 29: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Notice Period • Different notice periods for:

▫ Nonpayment of rent

▫ Other lease violations

▫ No fault evictions

▫ Vouchers

• Federal notice period may run concurrently with state law notice period

▫ Example: CA law requires 3 day notice for nonpayment of rent, but public housing rules require 14 days notice.

• Lease may provide for longer notice periods

• May have to allow for grievance procedure (public housing) or meeting (HUD Multifamily).

29

Page 30: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Notice Periods Generally

30

State law Deviation

Nonpayment of rent 3 day notice to pay or quit Public housing (14 days) HUD MF (must allow ten days for meeting)

Lease violations

3 day notice to cure HUD MF (must allow ten days for meeting)

Other violations/cause (ongoing nuisance, etc.)

3 day notice to quit HUD Multifamily & Mod Rehab (30 days)

Voucher 90 days

Page 31: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Notices must:

• include a clear statement of forfeiture ▫ CCP §1174

• be properly served

• Important: Any defect in the notice is a unlawful detainer defense

Page 32: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Content of Notice

• California law ▫ If violation can be cured, notice must be in alternative, i.e.

perform or quit

▫ Notice must state the breach

▫ Non-payment of rent: additional requirements

• Public housing (24 CFR 966.4(l)(3)(ii)): ▫ State specific ground for termination

▫ Inform the tenant of her right to respond

▫ Inform the tenant of her right to examine PHA documents

▫ Inform the tenant of her right to request a grievance procedure

32

Page 33: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Content of Notice • HUD Multifamily (24 CFR 247.4; Handbook

4350.3) ▫ Date tenancy is terminated; ▫ Grounds for termination with sufficient specificity to

enable preparation of defense (Amount of the balance due and the date of computation for non-payment of rent)

▫ Advise tenant of opportunity to present a defense in any judicial proceeding

▫ Advise tenant of the right to request a meeting with landlord within 10 days

▫ Advise that persons with disabilities have right to reasonable accommodation

33

Page 34: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Content of Notice

• Housing Choice Voucher (24 CFR 982.310(e))

▫ Ground for termination

• LIHTC and HOME

▫ State law and lease agreement

34

Page 35: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

35

Page 36: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Common Subsidized Housing

Violations

• Unauthorized occupants

• Recertification issues

• Disconnection of utilities due to tenant failure to pay

• Criminal Activity/Drug use

36

Page 37: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Mitigating Factors

• PHA or landlord may consider all relevant circumstances

▫ Seriousness of offense

▫ Extent of participation or culpability of individual family members

▫ Mitigating circumstances related to disability

▫ Effects of termination of assistance on other family members who were not involved

• Some courts require the PHA/landlord to consider mitigating factors before commencing eviction

37

Page 38: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Nonpayment of rent • Nonpayment of rent is often a serious lease

violation; can also result from termination of subsidy

• Defenses ▫ Cal. limitation: cannot demand rent more than one

year past due. CCP 1161(2). ▫ Improper calculation of rent; failure to recertify

correctly. ▫ Inclusion of other charges with rent ▫ Tender ▫ Warranty of habitability ▫ De minimis breach/Absence of tenant fault ▫ Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; Bankruptcy

38

Page 39: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Criminal Activity or Threatening

Behavior • PHAs and landlords must use leases that allow

for termination of tenancy for criminal activity that is:

▫ Drug-related;

▫ Other criminal activity that threatens the health, safety or right to peaceful enjoyment of other residents and persons residing in the immediate vicinity of the premises.

• The PHA may also terminate if a family member engages in alcohol abuse.

39

Page 40: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Persons Covered

• Criminal activity must be conducted by tenant, household member, or guest

• Distinguish grounds for eviction from grounds for termination (for voucher): actions of guests not basis for termination

40

Page 41: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Location of Criminal Activity

• Drug-related criminal activity: ▫ Public housing: on or off the premises ▫ HUD Multifamily: on or near ▫ Voucher: on or near

• Violent criminal activity: ▫ Voucher: on or near

• Other criminal activity: ▫ Nexus requirement for all programs: must affect

the safety or quiet enjoyment of residents on the premises.

41

Page 42: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Practice Tips

• Interplay between evictions for serious/repeated violations of the lease and termination of assistance

▫ Effect of resolution of eviction case on voucher termination

42

Page 43: Defending Evictions and Terminations from Federally

Resources • HUD Tenants Rights: HUD Programs (4th ed.

2012 and 2016 supp) (the Green Book)

▫ Order at www.nhlp.org

• CEB Eviction Defense/Landlord Tenant Manual

▫ Free access for new lawyers

• Rutter Group Landlord Tenant Manual

• Questions?

• Navneet Grewal: [email protected]

• Lauren DeMartini: [email protected]

43