deep underground neutrino experiment management plan – v1 ... · deep underground neutrino...

Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment

Management Plan – v1.6

dune-doc-2145

April 27, 2018

DUNEManagementPlan Pageii

Thiscurrentapprovedrevisionofthisdocumentcanbefoundasdune-doc-2145.

ReleaseNo. Date RevisionDescriptionV1.0 17Apr2017 Version1.0asapprovedbyDUNEECV1.1 10May2017 UpdatestoECmembershipandNDcoordinatorV1.2 11Jun2017 ECminutesnowindoc-dbV1.3 19Oct2017 Addconsortia,updateTB,updateleadershiprolesV1.4 25Nov2017 ExpandTDRSection,addeditorialteam

V1.5 14Dec2017 AddTDReditorsV1.6 27Apr2018 AddExecutiveBoardchangesandnewTechnicalCoordination

ThisdocumentaimstoclearlydefinetherolesandresponsibilitiesofthecurrentDUNEmanagementstructures.ItdescribesthedetailedimplementationplanoftheschemedefinedwithintheDUNECollaborationGovernanceDocument(CGD),dune-doc-1.Thisdocumentwillbeupdatedwhenthereareeither:

• ChangestothemanagementstructureasagreedbytheEC.• ChangestotheCollaborationGovernanceDocumentasagreedbytheDUNEInstitutionalBoard

(IB).• Changestonamesandtermsforelectedpositionsandchangestonamesandtermsforsenior

coordination/convenerroles(listedinSection5).• ChangestotheinternationaloversightstructureofLBNF/DUNEassetoutintheLBNF/DUNE

projectmanagementplan(PMP),dune-doc-117.

DUNEManagementPlan Pageiii

Contents

1 OVERVIEWOFTHEDUNEMANAGEMENTPLAN.............................................................1-7

1.1 Motivation............................................................................................................................................1-7

1.2 RelationtoCollaborationGovernanceDocument.................................................................................1-7

2 RELATIONOFDUNETOLBNFANDTHEHOSTLABORATORY...................................2-8

2.1 OverviewoftheDUNEandLBNFProjectStructures..............................................................................2-8

2.2 Top-LevelOrganization,Management,RolesandResponsibilities........................................................2-82.2.1 OverviewofManagementStructures......................................................................................................2-82.2.2 InternationalNeutrinoCouncil(INC).......................................................................................................2-92.2.3 ResourcesReviewBoard(RRB)..............................................................................................................2-102.2.4 FermilabDirectorate..............................................................................................................................2-112.2.5 DUNEManagement...............................................................................................................................2-112.2.6 Long-BaselineNeutrinoCommittee(LBNC)...........................................................................................2-122.2.7 Experiment–FacilityInterfaceGroup(EFIG)..........................................................................................2-12

3 MANAGEMENTOFDUNE......................................................................................................3-13

3.1 DUNEManagement............................................................................................................................3-13

3.2 DUNECo-Spokespersons.....................................................................................................................3-14

3.3 DUNETechnicalCoordinator...............................................................................................................3-15

3.4 DUNEResourceCoordinator...............................................................................................................3-16

3.5 DUNEExecutiveBoard........................................................................................................................3-17

3.6 Co-SpokespersonsAdvisoryGroup......................................................................................................3-19

3.7 TechnicalCoordination.......................................................................................................................3-203.7.1 TechnicalBoardMeetings.....................................................................................................................3-223.7.2 ProjectBoardMeetings.........................................................................................................................3-23

3.8 DUNEResourceBoard.........................................................................................................................3-24

3.9 DUNEProjectManagementattheNationalLevel...............................................................................3-25

3.10 DetectorConstructionConsortia.........................................................................................................3-25

DUNEManagementPlan Pageiv

3.10.1 ConsortiaProjectManagementBoards............................................................................................3-263.10.2 DUNEFarDetectorConsortia............................................................................................................3-27

4 ROLESANDRESPONSIBILITIESOFDUNEWORKINGGROUPS................................3-29

4.1 ComputingGroup...............................................................................................................................3-294.1.1 RolesandResponsibilitiesoftheDUNEComputingCoordinators........................................................3-294.1.2 Fermilab/CERN/DUNEInterfaceGroup.................................................................................................3-304.1.3 Software,DataandProductionManagementTeams............................................................................3-304.1.4 DatabasesGroup...................................................................................................................................3-314.1.5 CollaborativeToolsGroupCharge.........................................................................................................3-31

4.2 Physics................................................................................................................................................3-324.2.1 RolesandResponsibilitiesofthePhysicsCoordinator/Deputy.............................................................3-334.2.2 FDSimulationandReconstructionWorkingGroup...............................................................................3-334.2.3 SoftwareandsupportactivitiescommontoallPhysicsWorkingGroups.............................................3-334.2.4 Long-BaselineNeutrinoOscillationsPhysicsWorkingGroup................................................................3-344.2.5 High-EnergyNeutrinosandNucleonDecayPhysicsWorkingGroup.....................................................3-344.2.6 SupernovaNeutrinoandLow-EnergyPhysicsWorkingGroup..............................................................3-344.2.7 BeyondtheStandardModelPhysicsWorkingGroup............................................................................3-344.2.8 NearDetectorPhysicsWorkingGroup..................................................................................................3-35

4.3 BeamInterfacesWorkingGroup.........................................................................................................3-364.3.1 BICoordinators......................................................................................................................................3-364.3.2 BeamSimulationGroup.........................................................................................................................3-374.3.3 NeutrinoFluxPredictionandSystematicUncertainties........................................................................3-374.3.4 SecondaryBeamMonitors....................................................................................................................3-37

4.4 ProtoDUNE-SP....................................................................................................................................3-374.4.1 ProtoDUNE-SPCoordinators..................................................................................................................3-384.4.2 DetectorConstructionGroup................................................................................................................3-384.4.3 DetectorIntegration,TestingandInstallation(DITI)Group..................................................................3-394.4.4 CryogenicsandArgonInstrumentationGroup......................................................................................3-394.4.5 Cosmic-RayMuonTaggerGroup...........................................................................................................3-404.4.6 ProtoDUNE-SPComputingLiaison.........................................................................................................3-404.4.7 DataReconstructionandAnalysis(DRA)WorkingGroup......................................................................3-404.4.8 PromptProcessing(PP)Group...............................................................................................................3-414.4.9 DAQGroup.............................................................................................................................................3-414.4.10 JointSingle-Phase/Dual-PhaseGroups..............................................................................................3-42

4.5 ProtoDUNE-DP....................................................................................................................................3-434.5.1 ProtoDUNE-DPCoordinators.................................................................................................................3-434.5.2 6x6x6EHN1IntegrationGroup..............................................................................................................3-444.5.3 3x1x1OperationsGroup........................................................................................................................3-444.5.4 JointDual-Phase/Single-PhaseGroups..................................................................................................3-44

DUNEManagementPlan Pagev

4.6 NearDetectorConceptStudy..............................................................................................................3-444.6.1 UpdatedChargetotheNearDetectorConceptStudy..........................................................................3-454.6.2 RolesandResponsibilitiesoftheNearDetectorCoordinators.............................................................3-45

5 DUNEAPPOINTMENTS.........................................................................................................5-47

5.1 ManagementTeam.............................................................................................................................5-47

5.2 InstitutionalBoardChairandDeputy..................................................................................................5-47

5.3 Co-SpokespersonsAdvisoryGroup......................................................................................................5-48

5.4 FarDetectorConsortiaLeadership......................................................................................................5-485.4.1 APAConsortium.....................................................................................................................................5-485.4.2 Single-PhaseTPCElectronics.................................................................................................................5-485.4.3 Single-PhasePhotonDetectionSystem.................................................................................................5-485.4.4 DAQ........................................................................................................................................................5-485.4.5 HVSystem(FieldCage,CathodePlanes,HVFeedthrough)...................................................................5-485.4.6 SlowControlsandCryogenicInstrumentation......................................................................................5-495.4.7 CRPConsortium.....................................................................................................................................5-495.4.8 Dual-PhaseTPCElectronicsConsortium................................................................................................5-495.4.9 Dual-PhasePhotonDetectionSystemConsortium...............................................................................5-49

5.5 DUNECoordinationRoles....................................................................................................................5-495.5.1 Computing.............................................................................................................................................5-495.5.2 Physics...................................................................................................................................................5-505.5.3 BeamInterface......................................................................................................................................5-505.5.4 NearDetector........................................................................................................................................5-505.5.5 ProtoDUNE-DP.......................................................................................................................................5-505.5.6 ProtoDUNE-SP........................................................................................................................................5-50

5.6 DUNEWorkingGroups........................................................................................................................5-515.6.1 Computing.............................................................................................................................................5-515.6.2 Physics...................................................................................................................................................5-525.6.3 ProtoDUNE-SP........................................................................................................................................5-525.6.4 ProtoDUNE-DP.......................................................................................................................................5-535.6.5 JointProtoDUNE-SP/ProtoDUNE-DP.....................................................................................................5-54

5.7 TechnicalDesignReportEditorialTeams.............................................................................................5-545.7.1 CentralEditorialTeam...........................................................................................................................5-545.7.2 VolumeEditors......................................................................................................................................5-54

5.8 ActiveTaskForces...............................................................................................................................5-565.8.1 CalibrationTaskForce............................................................................................................................5-56

5.9 OtherCommittees..............................................................................................................................5-565.9.1 AuthorshipandPublicationsBoard(APB)..............................................................................................5-56

DUNEManagementPlan Pagevi

5.9.2 SpeakersCommittee..............................................................................................................................5-56

OverviewoftheDUNEManagementPlan

DUNEManagementPlan Page1-7

1 OVERVIEW OF THE DUNE MANAGEMENT PLAN TheDeepUndergroundNeutrinoExperiment(DUNE)attheLongBaselineNeutrinoFacility(LBNF)isthelargeinternationalcollaborationresponsiblefortheDUNEscienceprogram,theexecutionofthedetectorconstructionprojectandoperationofthedetectors.Thehigh-levelorganizationalmodel forLBNFandDUNEfollowsthestructuresetupatCERNfortheLHCandtheLHCexperiments.TheDUNEManagementPlan (DMP) is intendedtoprovideadetaileddescriptionof the implementationof theorganizationofDUNEand its relationshiptothemanagementof theLBNFprojectduringthedesignandconstructionphase.Itisorganizedasfollows:

• Section 1 describes the motivation for this document and its relation to the CollaborationGovernanceDocument(CGD),dune-doc-1.

• Section2providesanoverviewofthetop-levelinternationalgovernanceofbothLBNFandDUNEandtherelationshipsbetweenthetwoprojects.

• Section 3 describes the management of DUNE and the roles and responsibilities of themanagementstructureswithinthecollaboration.

• Section4describestheorganizationofthescientificandtechnicalgroupswithinDUNE.• Section5liststhecurrentcollaborationappointmentsandthetenureoftheseappointments.

1.1 Motivation Thepurposeofthisdocumentistoprovidethedefinitivesourceofinformationonthemanagementofthe DUNE collaboration, including organizational charts, details of roles and responsibilities, anddescriptionsofmanagementpolicies.Themainmotivationisto:

• DocumenttheimplementationoftheorganizationoftheDUNEcollaboration.• Provideaclearandtransparentcommunicationofthisinformationtotheentirecollaboration.

InadditiontoprovidingadescriptionoftheDUNEorganization,abriefoverviewoftherelationshipofDUNEtobothLBNFandFermilabisgiveninSection2.ThisisasummaryofthedetaileddescriptionintheLBNF/DUNEProjectManagementPlan(PMP),dune-doc-117.

1.2 Relation to Collaboration Governance Document TheDUNECollaborationGovernanceDocument(CGD)“GovernanceoftheDUNECollaboration”(dune-doc-1),asapprovedbytheDUNEInstitutionalBoard,definestheagreedrulesforthegovernanceofthecollaboration.TheCGDprovideshigh-leveldescriptionsoftherolesofthe:Co-Spokespersons,ExecutiveBoard(EB),TechnicalCoordinator(TC)andTechnicalBoard,andResourceCoordinator(RC)andResourceBoard. The DMP describes the implementation of these bodies. For example, the CGD describes themembership of the DUNE Executive Board (EB) and a general brief description of the role. TheDMPdescribestheimplementationoftheEB(withintherulessetoutintheCGD)anddescribeshowitoperatesinpractice, includingdetailsof therolesandresponsibilitiesof theEB,decision-makingprocessesandpoliciesontransparency.TheDMPisintendedtobeconsistentwiththeCGD.However,infuture,ifthereare inconsistencies, the CGD takes precedence. Under Article 10 of the CGD, “Other ManagementStructures”, the Co-Spokespersons are required to maintain an organizational chart for the currentcollaborationmanagementstructures.TheDMPservesthispurpose.

RelationofDUNEtoLBNFandtheHostLaboratory


2 RELATION OF DUNE TO LBNF AND THE HOST LABORATORY TheDeepUndergroundNeutrinoExperiment(DUNE)andtheLongBaselineNeutrinoFacility(LBNF)wereformed in2015 following the recommendationsof the2014U.S.ParticlePhysicsProjectPrioritizationPanel (P5). The recommendations called for formation of a truly international collaboration forconstructing a U.S.-based long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment with a powerful MW-scaleneutrinobeamandamassive liquidargonTPC (40 kt fiducial volume) situateddeepunderground: todiscoverCPviolationintheleptonsector;tosearchforprotondecay;andtoobserveneutrinosfromcore-collapsesupernovaexplosions.ThisprogramconsolidatesthepreviouseffortsintheU.S.(LBNE)andinEurope(LBNO).ThissectionoutlinestherelationshipoftheDUNEcollaborationto:

• TheLBNFproject.• FermiNationalAcceleratorLaboratory(FNALorFermilab)asthehostlaboratory.• TheinternationalgovernancestructuresforLBNF/DUNE.

2.1 Overview of the DUNE and LBNF Project Structures Followingthemodeloftheprojectstructureoflarge-scaleaccelerator-basedparticlephysicsexperiments,suchasATLAS/CMSexperimentsattheLHCfacility,theLBNF/DUNEenterpriseisdividedintotwoparts.The first is the facilities project (LBNF), which is responsible for design and construction of theconventional facilities, beamline, and cryogenic infrastructure needed to support the program. Thesecondistheexperimentalproject,runbytheinternationalDUNEcollaboration,whichisresponsiblefortheconstructionandcommissioningofthedetectorsneededtomeetthescientificgoalsoftheprogram.LBNF isorganizedas aDOE/Fermilabproject, incorporating contributions from internationalpartners.DUNE is an international collaboration. Fermilab, as host laboratory for this program, is directlyresponsiblefortheLBNFProjectandprovidesoversightoftheinternationalDUNEprojectonbehalfofallstakeholders. Fermilab is responsible to the participating funding agencies through the DOE for thesuccessfulcompletionoftheLBNFandDUNEprojects.TheanticipatedbreakdownofresourcesforLBNFandDUNEare:

• LBNF:75%DOEand25%non-DOE• DUNE(fourfardetectormodulesandtheneardetector):25%DOEand75%non-DOE

2.2 Top-Level Organization, Management, Roles and Responsibilities

2.2.1 Overview of Management Structures A set of structures has been established to provide: coordination among the participating fundingagencies;oversightoftheLBNFandDUNEprojects;andcoordinationandcommunicationbetweenthetwo.ThesestructuresandtherelationshipsamongthemareshowninFigure1andaredescribedinthefollowingsections.



Figure1:Top-levelorganizationstructureforoversightoftheDUNEandLBNFProjects.

2.2.2 International Neutrino Council (INC) The International Neutrino Council (INC) is composed of regional representatives, such as CERN, andrepresentativesoffundingagenciesmakingmajorcontributionstoLBNFinfrastructureortoDUNE.TheINCactsasthehighest-levelinternationaladvisorybodytotheU.S.DepartmentofEnergy(DOE)andtheFermilabDirectorate.TheINCfacilitateshigh-levelglobalcoordinationacrosstheentireenterprise(LBNFandDUNE).TheINCischairedbytheDOEOfficeofScienceAssociateDirectorforHighEnergyPhysicsandincludestheFermilabDirectorinitsmembership.ThecouncilmeetsandprovidespertinentadvicetotheLBNFandDUNEprojectsthroughtheFermilabDirectorasneeded.SpecificresponsibilitiesoftheINCinclude,butarenotlimitedto,thefollowing:

• During the formative stages of LBNF and DUNE, the INC helps coordinate the sharing ofresponsibilitiesamong theagencies for theconstructionof LBNFandDUNE. Individualagencyresponsibilities for LBNF will be established in bilateral international agreements with DOE.AgencycontributionstoDUNEwillbeformalizedthroughseparateagreements.

• TheINCassistsinresolvingissues,especiallytheissuesthatcannotberesolvedattheResourcesReviewBoard(RRB,Section2.2.3)level,suchasthosethatrequiresubstantialredistributionsofresponsibilitiesamongstthefundingagencies.

• The INCassistsasneeded in thecoordination, synthesis,andevaluationof input fromprojectreportschargedbyindividualfundingagencies,LBNFandDUNEprojectmanagement,and/ortheINCitself,leadingtorecommendationsforactionbythemanagingbodies.



The DUNE Co-Spokespersons and/or other participantswithin the Fermilab neutrino programwill beinvitedtosessionsoftheINCasneeded.CouncilmembershipmayincreaseasadditionalfundingagenciesmakemajorcontributionstoLBNFandDUNE.

2.2.3 Resources Review Board (RRB) TheResourcesReviewBoard(RRB)iscomposedofrepresentativesofallfundingagenciesthatsponsorLBNF and DUNE, and the Fermilabmanagement. The RRB provides focusedmonitoring and detailedoversight of each of the projects. The Fermilab Director in coordination with the DUNE ResourceCoordinator(RC)definesitsmembership.ArepresentativefromtheFermilabDirectoratechairstheRRBandorganizesregularmeetingstoensuretherequired flowofresources for thesmoothprogressandsuccessful completion of the LBNF and DUNE projects. The management teams from the DUNEcollaborationandtheLBNFprojectparticipateintheRRBmeetingsandmakeregularreportstotheRRBon technical,managerial, financial and administrativematters, aswell as reporting on the status andprogressoftheDUNECollaboration.Duringthedesignandconstructionphase,therearetwosubgroupsoftheRRB:RRB-LBNFandRRB-DUNE.EachofthesegroupsmonitorsprogressanddealswiththeissuesspecifictoLBNFandDUNE,respectively,whilethewholeRRBdealswithmattersthatconcerntheentireenterprise(LBNFandDUNE).TheRRBwillusuallymeetbiannuallyandatypicalRRBmeetingwillstartwithaplenaryopeningsession,followedbytwosuccessiveRRB-LBNFandRRB-DUNEsessions.AsDUNEprogressestowardexperimentaloperationsathirdsub-group,RRB-Computing,willconvene.DUNEResourceBoardmembers(seeSection0)serveasaDUNEcollaborationNationalContactstoeachsponsoringfundingagencywillbeinvitedasobserverstotheRRBsessions.TheRRBcanemploystandingDUNEandLBNFexternalscrutinygroups(suchastheLBNC)asneededtoassist it in its responsibilities. The scrutiny groups operate under the RRB, and provide detailedinformationonfinancialandpersonnelresources,costing,andotherelementsunderthepurviewoftheRRB.TherolesoftheRRBinclude:

• Assisting the DOE and the FNAL Directorate with coordinating and developing any requiredinternationalagreementsbetweenpartners.

• Monitoringandoverseeinggeneralfinancialandpersonnelsupport.• Assisting the DOE and FNAL Directorate with resolving issues that may require reallocation ofresponsibilitiesamongfundingagencies.

• Reachingconsensusonamaintenanceandoperationprocedure,andmonitoringitsfunction.• Approvingtheannualcommonfundbudgets(whenimplemented)forconstructionandM&OforLBNFandDUNE.

• MonitoringandoverseeinganyCommonProjectsandtheuseofcommonfunds.



2.2.4 Fermilab Directorate Fermilab,asthehostlaboratory,isdirectlyresponsibleforLBNF.Theresponsibilitiesincludethedesign,construction,installation,commissioningandoperationofthefacilitiesandinfrastructurethatsupporttheentireprogram:

• The neutrino beamline, including the primary proton beamline, target, horn, decay pipe,absorber,andallprimaryandsecondarybeamlineinstrumentation.

• The major technical infrastructure necessary to support the DUNE near and far detectors,includingcryogenicsystemsandcryostats.

• TheconventionalfacilitiesontheFermilabsiteforthebeamlineandneardetector.• The conventional facilities for the far detector at the Sanford Underground Research Facility

(SURF).AlthoughtheSouthDakotaScienceandTechnologyAuthority(SDSTA)ownsandoperatesSURF,Fermilabservesasthesinglepointofcontact fortheDUNEcollaborationonallmatterspertainingtothefarsite.

Fermilabwillworkwithinternationalpartnersindesigningandbuildingthesefacilities,andwiththeDUNEcollaborationtoensurethatthefacilitiesareoptimizedtoachievethesciencegoalsoftheexperimentalprogram.TheexistingFermilabPhysicsAdvisoryCommittee(PAC)willprovideregularinternationalscientificpeerreviewoftheprogram.Inaddition,Fermilabhascreatedanewpeerreviewcommittee,theLong-BaselineNeutrino Committee (LBNC), which meets more often than the PAC and focuses on the scientific,experimentalandtechnicalprogramofDUNEandLBNF.TheFermilabDirectorappointsthechairoftheLBNC. Reports from the LBNC to the Fermilab Director will be shared with the INC and the DUNEcollaborationmanagement.Fermilab, as host laboratory, will also provide oversight of the DUNE collaboration and detectorconstructionprojectthrough:

• RegularmeetingswiththeCollaborationleadership.• ApprovingtheselectionofCollaborationCo-Spokespersons.• SelectingtheTechnicalandResourceCoordinators,inconsultationwiththeDUNECollaboration

Co-Spokespersons.• ConveningandchairingtheResourcesReviewBoard.• RegularscientificreviewsbythePACandLBNC.• Director’sReviewsofspecificmanagement,technical,costandscheduleaspectsofthedetector

constructionproject.• Otherreviewsasneeded.

2.2.5 DUNE Management The DUNE collaboration, in consultation with the Fermilab Director, is responsible for forming theinternational DUNE team responsible for designing and constructing the detectors. The Technical



Coordinator(TC)andResourceCoordinator(RC)serveastheleadtechnicalandfinancialmanagersinthecontextof the internationalcollaboration.ThetwoCo-SpokespersonsandtheFermilabdirectorselectthemjointly.BecausetheDUNEconstructionwillbeexecutedthroughcontributionsfromanumberofdifferent funding agencies, DUNE maintains a Technical Coordination organization to manage thecombinedproject.TechnicalCoordinationisresponsibleforsatisfying individualtrackingandreportingrequirements associatedwith eachof thedifferent contributions. This document describes theDUNEmanagementstructuresimplementedforthedesignandconstructionphase.

2.2.6 Long-Baseline Neutrino Committee (LBNC) TheLongBaselineNeutrinoCommittee(LBNC)iscomposedofinternationallyprominentscientistswithrelevant expertise. It provides regular external scientific peer review for the two projects. The LBNCreviewsthescientific,technicalandmanagerialdecisionsandpreparationsoftheneutrinoprogram.ItactseffectivelyasanadjuncttotheFermilabPAC,meetingonamorefrequentbasisthanthePAC.TheLBNCmayemployadditionalDUNEandLBNFscrutinygroupsformoredetailedreportsandevaluations.

2.2.7 Experiment–Facility Interface Group (EFIG) Close and continuous coordinationbetweenDUNEand LBNF is required toensure the successof thecombinedenterprise.AnExperiment-FacilityInterfaceGroup(EFIG)wasestablishedinJanuary2015tooversee and ensure the required coordination both during the design and construction and theoperationalphasesoftheprogram.Thisgroupcoversareasincluding:

• Interfacesbetweenthenearandfardetectorsandthecorrespondingconventionalfacilities.• Interfaces between the detector systems provided by DUNE and the technical infrastructure

providedbyLBNF.• DesignoftheLBNFneutrinobeamline.• NeutrinobeamlineoperationalissuesthatimpactbothLBNFandDUNE.

TwoDeputyDirectorsofFermilabchairtheEFIG.ItsmembershipincludestheLBNFProjectDirectorandProjectManager;theDUNECo-Spokespersons,TechnicalCoordinatorandResourceCoordinator;andtheCERN-LBNF(NeutrinoPlatform)ProjectManager.Inaddition,theLBNCincludestheDOEFederalProjectDirectorforLBNF/DUNE,theFermilabChiefProjectOfficerandadesignatedrepresentativeoftheSouthDakotaScienceandTechnologyAuthority(SDSTA).InconsultationwiththeDUNEandLBNFmanagement,theEFIGChairswillextendthemembershipasdeemednecessarytocarryoutthecoordinationfunction.TheEFIGChairsdesignateaSecretaryoftheEFIG,whokeepsminutesofthemeetingsandperformsothertasksasrequestedbytheChair.ItistheresponsibilityoftheEFIGChairstoreportEFIGproceedingstotheFermilabDirectorandotherstakeholders.ItistheresponsibilityoftheDUNECo-SpokespersonstoreportEFIGproceedingstotherestofthecollaboration.It istheresponsibilityoftheLBNFProjectDirectorandProjectManagertoreportEFIGproceedingstotheLBNFProjectteam.TheEFIGmeetsbiweeklyorasneeded.

RolesandResponsibilitiesofDUNEWorkingGroups


3 MANAGEMENT OF DUNE AllaspectsofDUNEareorganizedandmanagedbytheDUNEcollaboration. Stakeholders includethecollaboratinginstitutions,thefundingagenciesparticipatinginDUNEandFermilabasthehostlaboratory.Thecollaborationisresponsibleforthedesign,construction,installation,commissioningandoperationofthedetectorsandprototypesusedtopursuethescientificprogram.TheDUNEExecutiveBoard is themain management body of the collaboration and it approves all significant strategic and technicaldecisions.TheconstructionoftheDUNEdetectorsisexecutedthroughworkpackagesassignedamongthedifferentinternationalpartnerscontributingtotheeffort.Thefundingagenciesresponsibleforeachoftheworkpackageswill typically setup theirownsupportingmanagement structures,whichare responsible forsatisfyingthetrackingandreportingrequirementsofthatagency.DUNETechnicalCoordinationmonitorsthe technicalcontributions fromthedifferentagenciesandprovides thenecessarycentralizedprojectcoordination functions, such as: maintaining the detailed WBS dictionary; maintaining the overallschedule; change control; interface documentation; standardized quality control/quality assurancepracticesandglobalriskmanagement.

3.1 DUNE Management Thetop-levelDUNEManagementTeamconsistsofthetwoCo-Spokespersons,theTechnicalCoordinator(TC),andtheResourceCoordinator(RC).TheTCandRCareselectedjointlybytheCo-Spokespersonsandthe Fermilab Director. TheManagement Team is responsible for the day-to-daymanagement of thecollaboration.TheManagementTeam is responsible fordeveloping theoverall collaborationstrategy,whichispresentedforapprovaltotheExecutiveBoard.TheExecutiveBoardismadeupoftheleadersofthemaincollaborationactivities.The upper-level of theDUNEmanagement structure, shown in Figure 2, consists of theManagementTeam; the DUNE Executive Board; Technical Coordination; the DUNE Resource Board; PhysicsCoordination;ComputingCoordination;BeamInterfaceCoordination;theDUNEFarDetectorconsortiaand(atthistime)thegroupresponsibleforNearDetectorConceptStudies.The Executive Board is the main decision-making body of the collaboration. The composition of theExecutiveBoardmeansthatallmajorstakeholdersincollaborationhaveavoiceinthedecision-makingprocess. In the post-TDR phase of DUNE, it is the intention that the Consortium Leaders and thecoordinatorsoftheothermajorcollaborationswillallbecomeelectedpositions.Thiswillensurethatthecollaborationasawholeisrepresentedinthedecision-makingprocess.Thetop-levelmanagementofDUNEiscomplementedbytheSpokespersonsAdvisoryCommittee(SAC).TheSACprovidesadvicetotheCo-Spokespersons,buthasnodecision-makingauthority.



Figure2:DUNECollaborationManagementStructure.

3.2 DUNE Co-Spokespersons Asdescribed inArticle4of theCollaborationGovernanceDocument (CGD)“Governanceof theDUNECollaboration” (dune-doc-1), the two DUNE Co-Spokespersons are the elected scientific leaders andrepresentativesofthecollaboration.TheCo-Spokespersonswillshareequallyleadership,authorityandresponsibilities.ThelongestservingoftheCo-SpokespersonservesasthechairoftheDUNEExecutiveBoardandtheshortestservingservesastheCollaborationGeneralAssemblyChair.TheCo-SpokespersonsworkcloselywiththeExecutiveBoardonallmajorcollaborationmatters.TheCo-SpokespersonsalsoworkcloselywiththehostlaboratoryDirector,theLBNF/DUNEExperimentInterfaceGroup(EFIG)andtheLBNFmanagementteam.TheresponsibilitiesoftheCo-Spokespersonsinclude:

• Defining the strategic direction of theDUNE collaboration, in consultationwith the ExecutiveBoard.

• Ensuring that the management of the DUNE collaboration, as defined in this document, isconsistentwiththerulessetoutintheCollaborationGovernanceDocument.

• Bearingtheauthorityandresponsibilityforday-to-daymattersoftheexperiment.



• PreparingtheagendafortheDUNEExecutiveBoard.

• Maintaininganup-to-dateversionoftheDUNEManagementPlan(dune-doc-2145)andtheDUNECollaborationStrategydocument(dune-doc-1050).

• LiaisingcloselywiththehostlaboratoryDirectoronissuesthataffectDUNE,LBNForFermilab.

• RepresentingtheDUNEcollaborationtothebroaderscientificcommunity.

• Liaisingwithpotentialnewinstitutionstoestablishpossibleroleswithinthecollaboration.

• AppointingtheDUNETechnicalCoordinator(jointlywiththeFermilabDirector).

• AppointingtheDUNEResourceCoordinator(jointlywiththeFermilabDirector).

• AppointingthecoordinatorsoftheDUNEscientificactivities(Physics,Computing,NearDetectorConceptStudyandBeamInterfacegroup).

• Working with the coordinators of the DUNE scientific activities to appoint working groupconveners.

• ChairingtheDUNEExecutiveBoard(longest-servingco-spokesperson).

• ChairingtheDUNEGeneralAssembly(shortest-servingco-spokesperson).

• WorkingwiththeLBNFProjectleadershiponstrategicissuesthataffectbothLBNFandDUNE.

• RepresentingtheDUNEcollaborationintheEFIG.

• Preparingtheagendaforcollaborationmeetings.

• MeetingwiththeSpokespersonsAdvisoryCommittee(normallymonthly).

ElectionProcess:TheDUNECo-SpokespersonsareelectedbytheDUNEcollaborationaccordingtotherulessetoutintheCGDdocument.

Article 5 of the CGD document provides the option of the Co-Spokespersons appointing a DeputySpokesperson.Atthistimethisoptionhasnotbeeninvoked.

3.3 DUNE Technical Coordinator TheDUNETechnicalCoordinator(TC)isappointedbytheCo-SpokespersonsinconsultationwiththeFermilabDirectorandhasreportingresponsibilitiestoboth.InthecontextoftheinternationalDUNEproject,theTCactsastheoverallprojectdirectorandisresponsibleforimplementingthedetectorconstructionproject.ResponsibilitiesoftheTCinclude:

• Overall leadership of the activities of Technical Coordination, which include: makingrecommendations on technical decisions, central project management and engineering, andservingasthetechnicalinterfacetoLBNF.

• ServingasamemberoftheDUNEManagementTeamandtheDUNEExecutiveBoard.

• Chairing regular (normally monthly) DUNE Technical Board meetings, as part of TechnicalCoordination.



• Chairing regular (normally monthly) DUNE Project Board meetings, as part of TechnicalCoordination.

• CommunicatingwiththehostlaboratoryChiefProjectOfficerregardingtechnicalissuesandthefeedbackfromexternalreviews.

• WorkingwiththeLBNFprojectleadershipthroughestablishedstructuressuchastheExperiment-FacilityInterfaceGroup(EFIG)tocoordinateonissuesaffectingbothprojects.

• Coordinatingtheprocessesthatenablethecollaborationtomakedecisionsregardingdetectortechnologicaldesignchoices.

• Organizingandconductingtechnicalreviewsofthedetectorsub-systemdesignsandconstructionplans

• Ensuringthattheconstructionprojectissuccessfullycarriedoutandthatallworkisperformedinasafemanner.

• ParticipatingintheEFIG.

TheTechnicalCoordinatormayappointadeputy,subjecttoExecutiveBoardapproval.

3.4 DUNE Resource Coordinator The DUNE Resource Coordinator (RC) is appointed by the Co-Spokespersons in consultationwith theFermilabDirectorandhasreportingresponsibilitiestoboth.TheRCworksdirectlywiththeTCtoensurethattheinternationalcollaborationhastheresourcesnecessarytocarryoutthedetectorconstructionproject.TheRCchairstheDUNEResourceBoardandistaskedwithpreparingtheMemorandaofUnderstanding(MOU)thatdefinethecontributionsandresponsibilitiesforeachcollaboratinginstitute.TheRCalsohasresponsibilityformanaginganycommonfinancialresourcesofthecollaboration(whenaCommonFundisestablished). When issuesarisewithin the internationalDUNEproject that requiremodificationtoexisting MOU with one or more of the participating funding agencies, the RC raises these issues atResourceBoardmeetingsfordiscussion.TheoutcomeoftheResourceBoarddiscussionsaretakentotheResourcesReviewBoard(RRB)forfinalapproval.ResponsibilitiesoftheRCinclude:

• Workingwith thenational groupsof IB representatives of theDUNECollaboration to identifyrepresentativestoserveontheDUNEResourceBoard.

• Trackingthecollaborationresources(bothhumanresourcesandfinancialresources).

• AssistingintheorganizationofRRBmeetingsandreportingonthestatusofDUNEprojectfinancesandresourcesatthesemeetings.

• ChairingtheDUNEResourceBoard.



• ServingasamemberoftheDUNEManagementTeamandtheDUNEExecutiveCommittee.

• Formalizingagreementswithcollaboratinginstitutesonassignedworkpackagesanddeliverables.

• InitiatingdiscussionsregardingfinancialissuesimpactingtheinternationalDUNEproject.

• ParticipatingintheEFIG.

3.5 DUNE Executive Board TheDUNEExecutiveBoard (EB) is theexecutivebodyof thecollaboration. Its roleandmembership isoutlinedinArticle6oftheCGDdocument.TheEBistheprimedecision-makingbodyinthecollaboration.AllsubstantivecollaborationdecisionswillbeapprovedbytheEB.Furthermore,theCo-SpokespersonswillseekadvicefromtheEBonallmajorcollaborationissues.TheDUNEEBisresponsibleforoversightofthe scientific and technical objectives and priorities of theDUNE collaboration, taking account of thefinancialaspectsaswellasotherresources.TheEBisresponsiblefortheoversightandapprovalofallmajorcollaborationappointments.TheEBischairedbythelongest-servingCo-Spokespersonandusuallymeetsonamonthlybasis.Membership:TheEBconsistsof:

• The four members of the DUNE Management Team (two Co-Spokespersons, TechnicalCoordinator,ResourceCoordinator).

• TheInstitutionalBoardChair.• TheConsortiumLeaders.• ThePhysicsCoordinator.• TheexternalComputingCoordinator.• OneoftheCoordinatorsoftheBeamInterfacegroup.• Until the time that the Near Detector consortia are in place, one of the leaders of the Near

DetectorConceptstudysitsontheEB.• AsdefinedintheCGD,theCo-Spokespersonsmaywishtoappointuptothreeadditionalmembers

to the EB to represent parts of the collaboration that are not otherwise represented.AppointmentsareforoneyearstartinginApril,subjecttoapprovalbythecoremembershipoftheEB.

• ThechairoftheSpeakersCommitteewillattendtheEBasanobserver.IftheCo-SpokespersonshaveappointedaDeputySpokesperson,theDeputywillattendtheEB.Whenrequired,thechairoftheEBmayinviteothermembersofthecollaborationtopresentaspecifictopicortoprovideexpertadvice.RolesoftheEB:TheroleoftheDUNEEBincludes:

• RatificationofallcollaborationdecisionsthatdonotfallunderthepurviewoftheInstitutionalBoard.

• ProvidingadviceoncollaborationstrategyandscientificpolicytotheCo-Spokespersons.• Reaching consensus-based decisions on all major strategic and technical choices for the

collaboration.



• ApprovaloftechnicaldecisionsthatrequireEBapproval(asdescribedintheDUNEchangecontrolprocess).

• Approval of all collaboration appointments unless otherwise specified in this document (seeSection5)ortheCGDdocument.

ResponsibilitiesoftheEBmembers:TheresponsibilitiesoftheindividualEBmembersinclude:

• Beingfamiliarwiththeover-archingcollaborationgovernancerulesaslaidoutintheCDG.• BeingfamiliarwiththecurrentDUNEcollaborationstrategy.• BeingavailabletoattendthemajorityoftheEBmeetings.• RespectingtheconfidentiallyoftheEBdiscussions.• RespectingthedecisionstakenwithintheEB.• Providingeffectivemanagementofthecollaborationactivitiesforwhichtheyareresponsible.

EBMeetings:TheEBnormallymeetsmonthly.InexceptionalcircumstancestheCo-Spokespersonsmaycalladditionalmeetingstoaddressspecificissues.ThemonthlyEBmeetingsareformalboardmeetings,withafixedstructure:

• DocumentationfortheEBmeetingnormallywillbepostedoneweekaheadofthemeeting.• Non-controversialagendaitemsmaybe“starred”(appearwithastarnexttothem).Starreditems

arenotdiscussedandaretakentobeapprovedwithoutdiscussion.However,atthestartofthemeeting,anyEBmembermayrequestthatanindividualitemis“un-starred”,inwhichcasetheyarediscussedasnormal.

• At each monthly EB meeting, the EB receives formal written short reports from: TechnicalCoordination; the Resource Board; Physics Coordination; and Computing Coordination. Thereportsprimarilydetailproposeddecisions,whichmayappearasstarred.

• TheagendaforEBmeetingsnormallywillincludethefollowingstandingagendaitems:o Apologiesforabsences;o Declarationsofconflictsofinterest;o Approvalofminutesofthelastmeeting;o Mattersarisingfromtheminutes;o Matterstoreport;o Approvalofstarreditems;o ReportfromTechnicalCoordination;o ReportfromtheResourceBoard;o ReportfromPhysicsCoordination;o ReportfromComputingCoordination.

Transparency: The EB aims to operate in an open and transparentmanner. Approvedminutes of ECmeetings aremade available to the entire collaboration (dune-doc-3159). Theminutes list all agendaitemsandusuallywillprovideasummaryofthediscussionsandanydecisions.Ifanagendaitemrelatestopersonalorsensitiveinformation,thefullECdiscussionmaybewithheldfromthepublicminutes.



Conflicts of Interest: The EB operates with a strict policy with regards to conflicts of interest of itsmembers.Allpotentialconflictsofinterestareannouncedatthestartofthemeetingandwillbenotedintheminutes.TheEBchairwillgenerallyconsiderthenotificationofadeclarationtobesufficient,butmaydecidethattheEBmemberinquestionshouldnotparticipateinthediscussionofaparticularagendaitemorshould leavethemeetingforthatagenda item. Conflictsof interest includeanycircumstancewheretheEBmemberortheEBmember’sinstitutionaredirectlyaffectedbyorhaveavestedinterestinaparticulardecision.Decision-MakingProcess:TheEBactsasamaindecision-makingbodyofthecollaboration.Itoperatesbyconsensusandthereisnoformalvoting(althoughtheEBchairmayseekastrawpolltoestablishthelevelofconsensus).Inthe(expectedtoberare)caseswhereconsensusonanagendaitemcannotbereachedataparticularmeeting,thedecision-makingprocessnormallywillfollowtheprocedurebelow:

• Nodecisionwillbetakenatthefirstmeetingwhereadecisionwassought.• TheagendaitemwillberevisitedatthenextEBmeetingandadecisionwillbetakenusingthe

ruleofconsensusminusone;consensusisdeclaredifbothCo-SpokespersonsconcurandatmostoneoftheotherEBmembersisindisagreement.

• If the EB still cannot reach consensus, the Co-Spokespersons have the executive authority todecideonhowtoproceed.

• IftheCo-Spokespersonsdonotagree,theInstitutionBoardchairwillbeaskedtosetupanadhocpaneltoprovidefurtherguidancetotheEBandCo-Spokespersons.

• Ifconsensusisstillnotreached,thematterinquestionmaybereferredtothehostlaboratorydirectorforarbitration.

QuorumforDecision-Making:TheEB isconsideredquorate ifat leasttwothirdsof itsmembership ispresenteitherinpersonorbyremoteconnection.

3.6 Spokespersons Advisory Committee TheSpokespersonsAdvisoryCommittee (SAC) isanelectedbody thatprovides informaladvice to theSpokespersons.TheSACisanadvisorybodywithnodecision-makingauthority.TheSAChastwomainpurposes:

• to provide advice to the Co-Spokespersons and to discuss issues that require attention, asdeterminedbytheCo-SpokespersonsandtheCommittee.

• to provide a conduit for DUNE collaborators to voice opinions and advice that they feel theycannotprovidedirectly.

• toprovideanearly-warningfeedbackmechanismforsignificantissuesthatarearisingwithinthecollaboration.

TheSACwillconsistof:

twojuniormembers,representinggraduatestudentsandearlycareerpost-doctoralresearchers.ThetwojuniormemberswillbenominatedbyYoungDUNEinAprilforaone-yearterm.



• fourelected“atlarge”members,twobeingelectedeachyearforatwo-yearterm.TheelectionstakeplaceinAprilandwillbecoordinatedbytheInstitutionalBoardchair.

MembersoftheSACmaynotalsobemembersoftheExecutiveBoardatthetimeoftheirelection..Theycanonlybere-electedonce.

3.7 Technical Coordination TechnicalCoordinationprovidessupportforallcollaborationactivitiesrelatedtothedesign,construction,installation,andcommissioningoftheDUNEdetectors.TheroleofTechnicalCoordinationistofacilitateandmonitorsuccessfulexecutionoftheDUNEdetectorconstructionprojectasdefinedbythescientificcollaborationthroughtheExecutiveBoard.DUNE detector constructionwill comprise contributions frommultiple funding agencies. Consortia ofinstitutions,usually frommore thanonecountry,willpartnerondifferentdetector sub-systems. Theconsortia will agree on the specific responsibilities and deliverables of the member institutions. Theparticipatingnationstakeresponsibility fortheprojectmanagementrequiredtoensuresuccessfulon-timedeliveryofthescopetakenonbythatparticipatingnation.Thisdistributestheprojectmanagementeffortandcosts.TechnicalCoordinationisthebodythatintegratestheconsortiaactivitiesintoanoverallDUNE construction project andprovides oversight andmonitoring of the project againstwell-definedcriteria.TechnicalCoordinationTeam:MembersoftheTechnicalCoordinationteamare:

• TheTechnicalCoordinator.• TheDeputyTechnicalCoordinator(ifappointed).• TheLBNF/DUNESystemsEngineer.• TheLeadDUNEMechanicalEngineer.• TheLeadDUNEElectricalEngineer.• AdditionalmembersoftheCentralEngineeringTeam.• TheEnvironment,Safety,andHealth(ES&H)Manager.• TheQualityAssurance(QA)Manager.• ProjectControlsSupport.• AdministrativeSupport.

SomeofthepersonnelassignedtotheserolesmaybesharedwiththeDUNE-USProjectteamand/orwithLBNF.ResponsibilitiesofTechnicalCoordinationinclude:Projectcoordination:



• Maintainingamastermilestone-basedschedulecoveringalldetectorconstructionefforts.ThestatusoftheschedulewillbetrackedusinginformationcollectedfromtheTechnicalLeadsoftheinstitutionalconsortia.

• Managingthechangecontrolprocess,startingapproximatelythreemonthsbeforethereleaseofthedetectorTechnicalDesignReport.

• Maintaining a central WBS dictionary, which clearly identifies the responsibilities of thecollaboratinginstitutionsintheDUNEconstructionproject.

• Providingguidanceandoversightoftheconsortiamanagementstructurestoensurethatclearlinesofreportingandresponsibilityaremaintainedthroughoutthecollaboration.

• MaintainingaDUNEriskregistryfortheoveralldetectorconstructioneffortwheretheriskswillbequantifiedprimarilyintermsoftheirpotentialeffectsontheschedule.

• Implementeffectiveriskmanagementprocessesandensuringthatthesearebeingimplementedthroughouttheconsortiaandnationalprojects.

• Assuming responsibility for the tracking, implementing and responding to recommendationsreceivedfromtheLBNCinpartnershipwithcollaborationmanagement.

• Assistingtheconsortiaindefiningandimplementingqualityassurance/qualitycontrolplansthatmaintainauniform,high-levelstandardacrosstheentiredetectorconstructioneffort.

• OrganizingdesignandconstructionreadinessreviewsasappropriatefortheDUNEdetectorsub-systems(consortiawillalsobeexpectedtoorganizetheirowninternalreviews).

DetectorintegrationandES&Hassurance:

• Maintainingthecomplete3DCADmodelsforallDUNEdetectors.• WorkingwiththeTechnicalLeadsoftheinstitutionalconsortiatoensurethatallinterfacesare

welldefinedandcomplete.• Maintainingwritten documentation describing the interfaces between different detector sub-

systemsandinfrastructure.• WorkingwithLBNFtoensureallinterfacestothecryostatandconventionalfacilitiesaredefined

andcompatible.• MaintainingthedrawingarchivetoensurethatDUNEhasacompletesetofapproveddrawings

forthedetector.• Maintaininganengineeringdocumentarchivetoensurethattheofficialengineeringanalysisand

designdocumentationisavailabletothecollaborationandforreviews.• Ensuringthatdetectorgroundingandelectricalshieldingrequirements(includethoseassociated

withES&H)aremet.• AssistingwithimplementationofES&Hprocessesintoallaspectsoftheproject.

Detectorinstallationanddevelopment/acquisitionofcommondetectorinfrastructure:• Interfacing with LBNF on conventional facilities requirements associated with the detector

installationsuchascraneavailabilityandstay-clearspaces.• Developinglogisticsplansforthemovementofmaterialsto/fromthedetectorsites.• Developingdetectorinstallationplansalongwithanyrequiredinfrastructureandtooling.



• Developing plans for the integration/testing of detector sub-systems alongwith any requiredinfrastructureandtooling.

• Providing an installation resourcewhere either critical safety issues exist (for example, craneoperation)oreffortisneededwhichspansalldetectorelements(materialtransport).

3.7.1 Technical Board Meetings TheTechnicalCoordinatorwillcallregular(usuallymonthly)TechnicalBoardmeetings.Theminutesofthesemeetings will be reported to the Executive Board at its next meeting. DUNE Technical Boardmeetings are the primary forum for generating recommendations for decisions on issues related todetector design, construction, installation, and commissioning. Technical Coordination takes allrecommendationsoriginatingfromTechnicalBoardmeetingstotheExecutiveBoardforapproval.TechnologicaldesignchoicesfacedbythecollaborationwillbediscussedatTechnicalBoardmeetings.Basedonthesediscussions,TechnicalCoordinationmaybringrecommendationsonpreferredtechnologychoices to the Executive Board. As appropriate, input from the physics coordinator/physics workinggroupswillbesoughttoensurethatalldesigndecisionsareproperlyalignedwiththescientificgoalsofDUNE.AttendeesofTechnicalBoardMeetingsinclude:

• TheDUNETechnicalCoordinator(Chair).• Co-Spokespersons(exofficio).• TheDUNEResourceCoordinator(exofficio).• TheDeputyTechnicalCoordinator(ifappointed).• TheLBNF/DUNESystemsEngineer.• TheLeadDUNEMechanicalEngineer.• TheLeadDUNEElectricalEngineer.• AdditionalmembersoftheCentralEngineeringTeam.• TheEnvironment,Safety,andHealth(ES&H)Manager.• TheQualityAssurance(QA)Manager.• TheConsortiumLeadersandTechnicalLeadsfromtheinstitutionalconsortiaresponsibleforeach

ofthedetectorsub-systems.

At specific Technical Board meetings, other members of the collaboration may be invited to bringadditional expertise. For all major decisions, the Technical Coordinator will appoint three internalcollaboration“referees”,withnodirectconflictofinterest,toprovideindependentadvice.Oneoftheserefereeswillbeaskedtoconsidertheimplicationsofanydecisionsonthesciencereachoftheexperiment.AgendaoftheTechnicalBoardmeetingswillevolveovertime:

• DuringtheperiodofdetectordesignandproductionoftheTechnicalDesignReports:



o InstitutionalConsortiawill be formed to construct theDUNEdetector sub-systems,asdescribedinSection0.Initially,thefocusoftheInstitutionalConsortiawillbeonfinalizingthe detector sub-system designs. Technical Boardmeetings will be used to evaluatedesigndecisionswithpotentialimpactsondetectorperformance.Anyrecommendationsregardingtechnicaldesignchoiceswiththepotentialforsignificantlyimpactingphysicsperformance,cost,and/orschedulewillbeforwardedtotheDUNEExecutiveBoard.

o TechnicalBoardmeetingswillbeusedtoensurethattheinterfacesbetweenthedifferentdetectorsub-systemsarewellunderstoodanddocumented.

o TechnicalBoardmeetingswillprovide the forumforneeded interactionsbetween theConsortiaLeadershipTeams.

• Duringtheperiodofdetectorconstruction(post-TDR):

o TechnicalBoardmeetingswillbeusedtomonitorthestatusoftheoverallconstructioneffortandattempttoidentifyissuesastheyoccur.Whenissuesarise,strategieswillbedevelopedforaddressingthem.Incaseswherethereareissuesthatrequireadditionalresources (financial and/or personnel), beyond those available at the time, TechnicalCoordinationwillmakeaformalreporttotheDUNEExecutiveBoard.

o TheTechnicalBoardwillensurethatanyinterfaceissuesareaddressed.

3.7.2 Project Board Meetings TheTechnicalCoordinatorwillalsocallregular(usuallymonthly)ProjectBoardmeetings.ProjectBoardmeetingsaretheprimaryforumfordiscussionsonissuesrelatedtoeffectivemanagementoftheoverallproject.The Project Board serves as the primary project change control board for change requests. Changerequestswithschedule/costimpactsbelowpre-determinedthresholds,asdefinedintheDUNEchangecontroldocumentation,willappearas“starred”itemsinTechnicalCoordinationreportstotheExecutiveBoard.ChangerequeststhateitherimpactinterfaceswiththeLBNFproject,oraffecttheDUNEsciencerequirements, or require modifications of MOUs with one or more contributing funding agency arediscussedwithinProjectBoardmeetingsbutrequirehigher-levelapprovalsstartingwiththeExecutiveBoard.AttendeesofProjectBoardmeetingsinclude:

• TheDUNETechnicalCoordinator(Chair).• TheDeputyTechnicalCoordinator(ifappointed).• TheLBNF/DUNESystemsEngineer.• TheLeadDUNEMechanicalEngineer.• TheLeadDUNEElectricalEngineer.• AdditionalmembersoftheCentralEngineeringTeam.• TheEnvironment,Safety,andHealth(ES&H)Manager.



• TheQualityAssurance(QA)Manager.• ProjectControlsSupportPersonnel.• The Consortium Technical Leads from the institutional consortia responsible for each of the

detectorsub-systems(ConsortiumLeadersmayattendjointlyorinlieuofTechnicalLeads).AgendaoftheProjectBoardmeetingswillevolveovertime:

• DuringtheperiodofdetectordesignandproductionoftheTechnicalDesignReports:o ProjectBoardmeetingswillbeusedtoensurethatthescopeofeachconsortiumisfully

documentedandthatresponsibilitieshavebeenassignedtotheparticipatinginstitutions.o ProjectBoardmeetingswillbeusedtoreviewthestatusoftheoveralldesigneffortand

monitorconsortiaprogresstowardsproductionoftheTechnicalDesignReports.o ProjectBoardmeetingswillbeusedtodevelopanddocumentaglobalriskregistryalong

withidentifiedmitigationstrategies.

• Duringtheperiodofdetectorconstruction(post-TDR):o During this stage, thedetector designwill comeunder formal change control. Project

Boardmeetingswill be the forum for discussing potential change requests. In caseswherechangeshavepotentialsignificantimpactsonphysicsperformance,cost,and/orschedule, Technical Coordination will make recommendations to the DUNE ExecutiveBoardforapproval.

o Project Boardmeetingswill be used tomonitor the status of theoverall constructioneffort.

o ProjectBoardmeetingswillbeusedtoregularlyreviewriskscontainedwiththeglobalriskregistryandmanagethemasappropriate.

3.8 DUNE Resource Board TheDUNEResourceBoardischairedbytheRCandhasamembershipthatincludesasinglerepresentativefromeachgroupofcollaboratinginstituteswhosefinancialsupportforparticipatinginDUNEoriginatesfromadistinct,independentfundingsource.AResourceBoardmemberisnominatedtotheRCbytherespectivegroupoftheinstitutionssupportedbytherelevantfundingagency.TheRCwillcontactthefundingagencyforconfirmation.Inthecasewhereasinglenationhasmultiplefundingagencies,ifitisagreedbytheseagencies,asinglepersoncanactastheResourceBoardmemberforthisnation.TheResourceBoarddiscussesissuesrelatedtocollaborationresourcessuchascontributionstoprojectcommonfundsanddivisionsofprojectresponsibilitiesamongthecollaboratinginstitutes.TheResourceBoardisalsoresponsibleforvettingproposedprojectchangerequestspriortotheirsubmissiontotheResourcesReviewBoardforapproval.ResourceBoardMembershipisrestrictedto:

• TheResourceCoordinator(Chair).



• TheResourceBoardmembers.• TheCo-Spokespersons(exofficio).• TheTechnicalCoordinator(exofficio).

Inspecificcases,theRCmayinviteothercollaboratorstoattendportionsofindividualResourceBoardsmeetingtoprovideexpertinputoncertaintopics.

3.9 DUNE Project Management at the National Level TheDUNEconstructionprojectwill comprisemultipleprojectswith independent fundingstreams.Forexample,therewillbeaDOEDUNE-USconstructionprojectresponsiblefortheDOEscope.Similarly,therewillbeconstructionprojectsfundedthroughotheragencies.Low-levelprojectmanagement,forexamplemaintainingresource-loadedschedules,willtypicallybeimplementedatthenationallevel.Whilstthelow-levelprojectmanagementwillbetheresponsibilityoftheindividualnationscontributingtotheconstruction,itisnecessaryfortheseparateprojectstobeincorporatedintooneoverallproject.NationalcontributionstotheconstructionoftheDUNEdetectorswillbedefinedwithintheoverallWBSmaintained by Technical Coordination, see Section 0. Similarly, Technical Coordination will track theoverallschedulethroughdetailedmilestones.Itistheresponsibilityofthenationalprojectmanagementteamstoprovideregularreports(statusupdates)toTechnicalCoordinationthroughtheTechnicalLeadsofthedetectorconstructionconsortia,seeSection3.10.

3.10 Detector Construction Consortia The construction of the DUNE detectors will be executed by consortia of institutions that take onresponsibilityforthedeliveryofdetectorsub-systems.TheseconsortiawillreplacethevariousdetectorWorkingGroupsthatwereputinplaceintheformativestageofthecollaboration.Forexample,theSingle-PhaseFarDetectorAPAconsortiumreplacestheFarDetectorAPAWorkingGroup.Each consortium will elect/select its leadership and will define the roles and responsibilities of theparticipating institutions in the sub-system design/construction. It is hoped that, with the aid of thecollaborationmanagement,thenationalgroupingswithintheconsortiawillbeableapproachtherelevantfunding agencieswith specific funding proposals for the detector construction-phase, such that likelyfunding lines can be established in or before 2019. Consortia membership will remain open and isexpectedtoexpandasnewinstitutionsjointhecollaboration.TheDUNEdetectorsub-systemconsortiaareself-managinginternationalgroupsofinstitutions,operatingwithintheDUNEcollaborationaccordingtothefollowingrules:

• Each consortium will form a Consortium Board (CB) with one representative from eachparticipating institution. The CBs will manage the internal organization of the consortium,including:theelection/selectionoftheConsortiumLeaderandTechnicalLead;theassignmentof



institutional responsibilities; and the assignment of roles/responsibilities for new consortiummembersaddedaftertheinitialconsortiumorganization.

• TheconsortiumwillelectitsownConsortiumLeader.TheConsortiumLeaderisresponsibleforthesub-systemdeliverablesandrepresents theconsortiumtotheoverallDUNEcollaboration.TheConsortiumLeaderisalsoresponsiblefortheeffectivemanagementoftheconsortium.Itisexpected that the Consortium Leader will be a university faculty member or equivalent in alaboratory.

• The consortium will select a Technical Lead to act as the overall project manager for theconsortium.TheTechnicalLeadactsastheinterfacetoTechnicalCoordinationandisresponsiblefor monitoring/reporting progress against the agreed schedule. The Technical Lead is alsoresponsibleformaintainingconsortiuminterfacedocumentationandprocessingchangecontrolrequeststhroughtheProjectBoard.TheTechnicalLeadreportstotheoverallConsortiumLeader.

• The consortium is responsible for assigning a provisional division of responsibilities for thedetectorsub-systemamongsttheparticipatinginstitutions.Thisdivisionofresponsibilitiesmustaccount for the resources that are likely to be available. The internally agreed division ofresponsibilitiesmustbepresentedanddiscussed intheTechnicalBoardmeetings, fromwhichformalrecommendationswillbeforwardedtotheDUNEExecutiveBoardforapproval.

• Ifmorethanonenationiscontributingtothedetectorsub-system,theconsortiumwillimplementaconsortiumProjectManagementBoard (PMB) thatwillmeetmonthly. Ifonlyonenation isparticipatingtheroleof thePMB isadoptedbytheprojectmanagementteamat thenationallevel. The PMB is chaired by the Technical Lead and includes the project leads from theparticipatingcountries.ThePMBaimstomaintaintightcommunicationbetweenthecountriesparticipatingintheconsortiumconstructionactivity.

• Theconsortiumisresponsiblefordefiningadetailedbreakdownofdeliverables/responsibilitiesthatwillbeincludedintheoverallDUNEcollaborationWorkBreakdownStructure(WBS)heldbyTechnicalCoordination.

• Theconsortium is responsible forprovidingsufficient scientific support for simulation/analysisactivities directly related to establishing that DUNE detector designs meet the scientificrequirementsoftheexperiment(anessentialpartofthedetectorTDRs).

• The consortium is responsible for producing detailed MoUs that define the consortium'sinstitutional/national deliverables. The scope of the MoUs needs to be agreed between theconsortiumandtheDUNEResourceCoordinator.

3.10.1 Consortia Project Management Boards Forthecaseswherethemembershipofaconsortiumisspreadacrossmorethanonecountry/fundingsource,theconsortiumwillberequiredtoimplementaninternationalProjectManagementBoard(PMB).ProjectManagementBoardMembershipisrestrictedto:

• TheConsortiumLeader(Chair).• TheTechnicalLeadoftheconsortium(DeputyChair).• TheleadProjectManagersfromeachparticipatingnation.



• TheDUNETechnicalCoordinator• TheDeputyTechnicalCoordinator(ifappointed).

TheroleofthePMBistoensuregoodcommunicationbetweentheprojectmanagementteamsfromthedifferentparticipatingnations;itisnotadecision-makingbody.

3.10.2 DUNE Far Detector Consortia ThefirstDUNEconsortiahavebeenformedtoplanandcarryoutconstructionoftheDUNEFarDetectorsub-systems. Atotalofnineconsortia,threeeachfocusingondistinctsub-systemsforthesingle-anddual-phasedesignsandanadditionalthreefocusingongenericsub-systems(DAQ,HVandSlowControls)forbothdesignshavebeenformedinitially.Theactivitiesoftheconsortiaarecoordinatedandmonitoredthrough theTechnicalCoordinationorganizationheadedby theTechnicalCoordinator,as indicated inFigure3.

Figure3:OrganizationoftheFarDetectordesignandconstructionactivities.

Insummary,constructionofthecomponentsfortheDUNEFarDetectordesignswillbetheresponsibilityofthefollowingdetectorsub-systemconsortia:

• Anode Plane Assemblies (APAs): responsible for the final design and construction of the FarDetectorAPAs,basedontheexistingdesign(Single-Phaseonly).

• Single-PhaseTPCElectronics:responsiblefortheelectronicreadoutofthedetectorfromthefrontendtothewarminterface.

• Single-PhasePhotonDetectionSystem(PDS):responsibleforthedesignandconstructionoftheFarDetectorphotondetectionsystem,includingelectronicsreadout.

• DataAcquisition (DAQ): responsible for the design and construction of the Far Detector DAQsystem,fromwarminterfacetoofflinestorage.Jointconsortiumforsingle-phaseanddual-phasedesigns.

• HighVoltageSystem(FieldCage,CathodeplaneandHVFeedthrough):responsibleforthefinaldesignandconstructionofthehigh-voltagesystemfortheFarDetector,basedontheexistingdesign.Jointconsortiumforthesingle-phaseanddual-phasedesigns.

• SlowControlsandCryogenicInstrumentation(SC):responsibleforthedesignandconstructionoftheFarDetectorSlowControlssystemandfortheassociatedcryogenic instrumentation. Jointconsortiumforthesingle-phaseanddual-phasedesigns.

TechnicalCoordinator

TechnicalCoordination

SPAPA SPTPCElectronics

SPPhotonSystem DAQ HVSystem Slow

Controls DPCRP DPTPCElectronics

DPPhotonSystem



• ChargeReadoutPlanes(CRPs):responsibleforthefinaldesignandconstructionofthedual-phaseFarDetectorCRPs.

• Dual-PhaseTPCElectronics:responsiblefortheelectronicreadoutofthedetectorfromthefrontendtothewarminterface.

• Dual-phasePhotonDetectionSystem(PDS):responsibleforthedesignandconstructionoftheFarDetectorphotondetectionsystem,includingelectronicsreadout.

Itispossiblethatadditionalfardetectorconsortiawillbeformedatalaterdatetotakeresponsibilityforadditional(smaller)systemssuchasalasercalibrationsystemiftheyaredeterminedtobeneeded.AproposedchangetothenumberoffardetectorconsortiawouldbereviewedandapprovedbytheDUNEExecutiveBoard.



4 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF DUNE WORKING GROUPS

4.1 Computing Group The Computing group takes responsibility for the central computing activities of the collaboration,includingsoftwaremanagementandproduction.Incontrast,theresponsibilityforthedevelopmentofsoftware (reconstruction and analysis) is distributed across the relevant physics working groups. Forexample, the development of LAr-TPC reconstruction software for the long-baseline (LBL) neutrinooscillationstudieswilltakeplacewithintheLBLgroupunderPhysicsCoordination.ThetwoComputingCoordinatorsleadtheComputingGroup.TheactivitiesoftheComputingGroupareorganizedintosixdistinctareasasindicatedinFigure4.

Figure4:TheorganizationalstructureoftheDUNEComputingGroup.

4.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities of the DUNE Computing Coordinators To provide effective management of the DUNE computing resources at the host laboratory, oneComputingCoordinatorwillbeaFermilabemployeeandwillactasthemainlinktothehostlaboratoryComputingSector.Theother(external)ComputingCoordinatorwillactasthemainlinktothescientificcollaboration.ThehostlaboratoryComputingCoordinatorisresponsiblefor:

• ProvidingtheprimeliaisonwithFermilab’sComputingSector(SCDandCoreComputing);• RepresentingtheDUNEcomputinggroupontheFermilab/CERN/DUNEInterfaceGroup;• ReportingtothecollaborationmanagementontheavailabilitytoDUNEofFermilabcomputing

resources and monitoring whether the resources are commensurate with the needs of thecollaboration;

• PlanningtheusageofthecomputingresourcesatFermilab;• Providing top-level management of the activities of the Software Management, Data

Management,ProductionandDatabaseteams;• WorkingtogetherwiththeexternalComputingCoordinatortoeffectivelymanagethecomputing

activitieswithintheDUNEcollaboration;

ThesecondComputingCoordinatorisresponsiblefor:• ProvidingtheprimeliaisonwiththeDUNEscientificcollaborationinrelationtoComputing;

ComputingCoordinators

Fermilab/CERN/DUNEInterfaceGroup

SoftwareManagement

Team

DataManagementTeam

ProductionTeam

DatabaseTeam

CollaborativeToolsTeam



• Working togetherwith the host-laboratory Computing Coordinator to effectivelymanage thecomputingactivitieswithintheDUNEcollaboration;

• Providing the interfacebetweenthecollaborationand theCollaborativeTools teamtoensurethattheneedsofthecollaborationarebeingeffectivelyaddressed.

ThetwoComputingCoordinatesarejointlyresponsiblefor:

• Nomination of the leaders of the various Computing teams, in consultation with the Co-Spokespersons.

4.1.2 Fermilab/CERN/DUNE Interface Group TheDUNEComputingCoordinator(hostlaboratory)chairstheFermilab/CERN/DUNEInterfaceGroup.ItismadeupofarepresentativefromeachoftheFermilabComputingSectorandCERNITDivision,aswellasa representative fromtheprotoDUNEdetectorgroups (protoDUNE-SPandprotoDUNE-DP)and theCERNNeutrinoPlatform. The InterfaceGroupwillmeet at least thanoncepermonth,withmeetingsorganizedbythechair.Additionalexpertsfromthecollaboration,CERNIT,FermilabComputingSectorandotherorganizationsmaybeaskedtoattendedandparticipateasrequired.TheresponsibilityoftheInterfaceGroupistoaddresssoftwareandcomputingissuesthatdefineorspanthe boundaries between the host laboratories, detectors or detector subsystems. These topicsmayinclude computing, software interfaces, data management and distribution paths, as well as otherscientific computing oriented topics. This body is the official DUNE conduit for communicationswithCERN-IT.

4.1.3 Software, Data and Production Management Teams ThreeseparatemanagementteamsareresponsibleforthecentralDUNEcomputingactivities.Eachgrouphasanidentifiedconvener.Inadditiontoanyinternalgroupmeetings,thesegroupscometogetheratabi-weekly“CoreAnalysisComputing”meeting.

4.1.3.1 SoftwareManagementTeam TheSoftwareManagementGrouphastheresponsibilityofmanagingallofthecode/softwarethatisdevelopedbyorsupportstheDUNEexperiment,including:

• CollectionanddisseminationofDUNEsoftware.• Generalreleasemanagement.• ProvisionofofficialcodereleasesforallMCproductionanddataprocessing.• Codedistribution.• Providingtheinterfacetoexternalsoftwarecollaborations(GEANT,GENIEandLArSoft).

4.1.3.2 DataManagementTeam The DUNE experiment will accumulate a large inventory of data from protoDUNE, DUNE and MCsimulation. TheDataManagementGroupisresponsiblefortheorganizationanddistributionofthese



data.Itisalsoresponsibleforprovidingthecatalogs,interfaces,andneededtomeettheneedsoftheexperiment.Inparticular,thedatamanagementgroupwillberesponsiblefor:

• Archivingofalldata(includingMonteCarlo)fromDUNE(includingtheprotoDUNEs).• Understanding and resolving issues related to the transport of the data between host

laboratories, following the policies/protocols defined by the CERN/FNAL Computing Interfacegroup.

• Disseminationofthisdatatocollaboratinginstitutions.• Data-handling system(s) and ensuring that data can be accessed/disseminated to siteswhere

analysisisperformed.

4.1.3.3 ProductionTeam The Production team is responsible for all large-scale DUNE Monte Carlo campaigns (includingprotoDUNEs)andforthecentralprocessingandreconstructionofdata.Ithasresponsibilityfor:

• Planningandgenerationofschedulesforlarge-scaleproductioncampaignsandreportingthesetohigher-levelmanagementthroughtheComputingCoordinator.

• Runningproductioncampaigns(MCordataprocessing).• Documentingproductionoutputandpresenting theDUNEcollaborationwithofficialdatasets,

analysisntuplesandotherofficialdataproducts(includingcalibrationconstants).• Maintenanceandcurationofdatasetssuchthattheycanberegeneratedorre-runatalaterdate

forreproducibilityorvaliditystudies.

4.1.4 Databases Group TheDUNEexperimentwill requireanumberofdatabases related to theconstruction,calibrationandoperationsofthedetectors.Theformationofaspecificgroupisintendedtoavoidtheproliferationofadhocsolutionsacrossthecollaboration.Centralizingtheseactivitiesisintendedtoprovidearoutetolong-termmaintainability.Thedatabasegroupwillberesponsiblefor:

• Coordinatingrequestsfromthecollaborationfordatabaseresources.• Managingthespecificationsrelatingtothesedatabases(i.e.scalabilityoraccessibility)andfor

ensuringthatprovidedsolutionsmeetthesespecifications.• Providingtheexperimentwiththeinterfacesand/ortoolstopopulatethedatabasesandforany

associateddocumentationormonitoringthatisneededfortheiroperation.• Updating,asneeded,thedatabaseinfrastructureordesignstomeettheneedsoftheexperiment.

Thecollaborationasawholewillbeencouragedtoengageintheseactivities.

4.1.5 Collaborative Tools Group Charge TheCollaborativeToolsgroupwill specifyandmaintaingeneral collaboration tools, its responsibilitiesinclude:

• IdentifyingpossiblesoftwaresolutionstomeettheneedsforDUNEcollaborativetools;• MaintainingandprovidingsupportfortheDUNEdocumentdatabase.• Maintainingthemeetingagendatoolsandthestorageofpresentationmaterials.• MaintainingtheCollaborationmemberdatabase.



• ManagingDUNEpublicandinternalwebpages.• Providingtoolsforrunningelectionsasrequested.• Providingtoolstomanagepaperdraftsandtheeditorialprocess.

This group interfaces with many areas of the Collaboration, including collaboration members, theInstitutionalBoardandtheExecutiveCommittee.

4.2 Physics ThePhysicsgrouptakesresponsibilityfordevelopinganddemonstratingthephysicsprogramofDUNE.Thisworkincludessoftwareresponsibilitiesincludingthedevelopmentandmaintenanceofsimulation,reconstruction,andanalysistoolsforDUNEFDandNDphysicsmeasurements.Near-andmedium-termactivitieswithinthePhysicsworkinggroupswillculminateinthecompletionoftheDUNETechnicalDesignReport(TDR),includingasubstantialPhysicsVolumeoftheTDRthatdescribesthephysicsprogramofDUNEandrobustlydemonstratestheprojectedsensitivities.ThecontentoftheTDR Physics Volume will be provided by the Physics groups and will include thorough and detaileddescriptionsofthe:

• Physicsmotivationsandcurrenttheoreticalandexperimentallandscape.• Generalmeasurementtechniquesbeingapplied.• Specificanalysismethodologiesandalgorithmstobeused.• Relevant backgrounds and systematic uncertainties, how these are mitigated, and robust

estimatesoftheirmagnitudes.• UnderlyingMonteCarlosimulations,particularlyanyaspectsspecifictoDUNE.• Projectedphysicssensitivities.

InadditiontoprovidingthecontentofthePhysicsVolume,thePhysicsgroupswillalsoprovidesupportingphysics studies, tables, and figureswhere required for other volumes of the TDR (e.g., in support ofdetectordesignchoices).ThePhysics organization chart is shown inFigure5. Theworking groups aredesignedaround specificphysicsmeasurements.Cross-groupengagementisrequiredinallcases,anditistheresponsibilityofthePhysicsCoordinatorandDeputyPhysicsCoordinatortoensurethatsucheffortsareco-developedandproceedingefficiently.

Figure5:OrganizationstructureofDUNEPhysicsgroups.

PhysicsCoordinator+Deputy

FarDetectorSim/Reco

WG

LongBaselineWG

Low-E/SNBWG

HighE/NDKWG

BSM/ExoticsWG

NearDetectorPhysicsWG



4.2.1 Roles and Responsibilities of the Physics Coordinator/Deputy ThePhysicsCoordinatorisresponsiblefor:

• PlanningthephysicsrelatedactivitiesofDUNE.• Monitoringtheprogressofthephysicsworkinggroupsagainstagreedmilestones.• Maintaininganuptodatelistofuncoveredtopics.• ReportingprogresstotheLBNCandotherreviewcommittees.• Nominationoftheleadersofthevariousphysicsworkinggroupconveners.Nominationswillbe

madeinconsultationwiththeDeputyPhysicsCoordinatorandtheCo-Spokespersons.TheDeputyPhysicsCoordinatorisresponsiblefor:

• SupportingthePhysicsCoordinatorinhis/herroles.

4.2.2 FD Simulation and Reconstruction Working Group TheFarDetectorSimulationandReconstructionWorkingGroupisresponsibleforthecoresimulationandreconstructioncodeoftheDUNEcollaboration(includingthebasecodeforprotoDUNEs).ItisresponsibleforthefollowingaspectsoftheDUNEMonteCarlosimulation:

• DevelopmentandmaintenanceoftheFDandprotoDUNEMonteCarlosimulationsoftware.• EnsuringFDsimulationsoftwarerunsefficiently.• DevelopmentandmaintenanceofaFastMCforusebyPhysicsWGs.• Supporting PhysicsWGswith group-specific simulation initiatives and required interfaces (for

example,low-energyneutrinocrosssectioncode).• ClosecoordinationwithProtoDUNE“Analysis”group(s)onsimulationtasks.

Italsohasresponsibilityforlow-levelreconstruction(forbothDUNEandprotoDUNE):

• DevelopmentandmaintenanceofTPCandphotondetectorsignalprocessingandhitfinding;• Relatedbaseclasses,interfacesandtools;• Eventbuildingandclustering;• ClosecoordinationwiththeProtoDUNE“Analysis”group(s)toensurethatthenecessarytoolsare

available.Inaddition,thereareseveralareasofhigh-levelreconstructionandanalysissupportthatfallunderthisgroup:

• Corereconstructionsoftwaredesign(baseclasses,uniformityofinput/output).• ForumforgeneralreconstructionR&DnotyetintegratedintospecificPhysicsWGs.• CognizanceofreconstructionalgorithmeffortstakingplaceinPhysicsandProtoDUNEWGs.• MaintenanceofcodeforgeneratingofflinentuplefilesforPhysicsWGs.

4.2.3 Software and support activities common to all Physics Working Groups ThefollowingresponsibilitiesapplytoallofthephysicsgroupslistedbelowandarenotrepeatedlaterineachPhysicsWorkingGroupsubsection.ThePhysicsWorkingGroupsareresponsibleforanalysis-specificsoftwaretoolsandforsupportingtheneedsofdetectordesigngroups:



• Developmentofhigh-levelreconstructionalgorithmsasrequiredbyeachgroup’sspecificneeds,for example, track reconstruction, shower reconstruction, energy estimation, and particleidentification.

• Development of software as required for the group’s specific signal fitting, backgroundestimation,systematicuncertaintyestimation,andsensitivitycalculationneeds.

• Development of group-specific physics process simulation as appropriate. Close coordinationwithSimulationsandPhysicsCoordinationteam,withagoalofintegratingtheseeffortsintothebroaderFDSimulationandReconstructiongroupasappropriate.

• ProvidingsupportandinputtoDetectorandBeamgroupsasitrelatestophysicssensitivitystudiesandtheimpactofdesignchoices(forexample,DAQ,photondetector,electronics).

4.2.4 Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillations Physics Working Group TheLong-Baseline(LBL)NeutrinoOscillationsPhysicsWorkingGroupisresponsiblefordevelopingDUNE’sbeam-basedthree-flavorneutrinosectorphysicsmeasurements.Activitiestowardthisinclude,butarenotlimitedto:

• Developingalgorithmsforneutrinoflavoridentificationandenergyestimation.• Understanding the impact of, and mitigating, sources of systematic uncertainties for the

oscillationparametermeasurements.CoordinationwithotherDUNEworkinggroupsisrequired,facilitatedbythePhysicsCoordinatorandworkinggroupleaders.

• Developing fitting engines and signal extraction techniques for oscillation parametermeasurements,towardstatisticalsensitivityandsystematicuncertaintymitigation.

• SupportingtheNearDetectorConceptStudy.

4.2.5 High-Energy Neutrinos and Nucleon Decay Physics Working Group The High-Energy and Nucleon Decay Physics Working Group is responsible for developing DUNE’smeasurementsrelatedtoatmosphericneutrinosandbaryonnumberviolationandnucleondecay,mostnotablyprotondecay.ItisresponsibleforsupportingtheneedsofDUNEphysicsmeasurementswherecosmogenicbackgroundsarerelevant(forexample,protondecay).

4.2.6 Supernova Neutrino and Low-Energy Physics Working Group TheSupernovaNeutrinoandLow-EnergyPhysicsWorkingGroup is responsible fordevelopingDUNE’smeasurementsofsupernovaburstneutrinosandotherlow-energyneutrinosignatures.

4.2.7 Beyond the Standard Model Physics Working Group TheBeyondtheStandardModel(BSM)PhysicsWorkingGroupisresponsiblefordevelopingawiderangeofphysicsmeasurementsmadepossiblewiththeLBNF/DUNEexperimentalsetup.ThisincludesbothNDandFDsignatures.TheBSMgroupisnotthesoleforumforBSMmeasurementsinDUNEandthedivisionofresponsibilitiesisdescribedbelow.

• ProtondecayandotherbaryonnumberviolationsignaturesaretheresponsibilityoftheNucleonDecaygroupandarenotpartofthescopeoftheBSMgroup.



• BSMsearchesusingsupernovaburstneutrinosaretheresponsibilityoftheSupernovaNeutrinoandLow-EnergyPhysicsgroupandarenotpartofthescopeoftheBSMgroup.

• Newphysics thatmayappear as amodification to long-baseline flavoroscillations, suchNon-StandardInteractions(NSI), is largelytheresponsibilityoftheBSMgroup. TheBSMgroupwilldevelopthetheoreticalscopeofsuchmeasurements,estimatesensitivities,andprovidesoftwaretools unique to these signatures (for example, calculations of expected fluxes for particularmodelsandmodelparameters).TheLBLgroupwillnonethelessdevelopmanytoolsforstandardoscillationsthatareimmediatelyapplicabletotheseBSMmeasurements,andthesewillbelargelyadoptedbytheBSMgroup.ThePhysicsCoordinatorandtheworkinggroupleaderswillensurethatsuchtoolsaredevelopedwithpotentialBSMapplicationsinmind.

• NewphysicssignaturesintheNDarelargelytheresponsibilityoftheBSMgroup(forexample,short-baselineneutrinooscillationsandbeam-relateddarkmattersearches).TheBSMgroupwilldevelopthetheoreticalscopeofsuchmeasurements,estimatesensitivities,andprovidesoftwaretoolsuniquetothesesignatures.TheNDPhysicsgroupwillnonethelessdevelopmanytoolsforits own needs that are immediately applicable to these BSM measurements. The PhysicsCoordinator and the working group leaders will ensure that such tools are developed withpotentialBSMapplicationsinmind.

4.2.8 Near Detector Physics Working Group TheNearDetectorPhysicsWorkingGrouphasarangeofresponsibilitiesrelatedtoneutrinoscatteringphysicsandthesupportofotherphysicsgroups.

• AdvancingNDsimulationandreconstructionasdescribedbelow.• DevelopingtechniquesforfluxuncertaintyreductionthroughNDneutrinomeasurements.• Developing ND event selections and samples in support of long-baseline oscillation

measurements,inparticulartowardmitigationofcrosssectionsystematicuncertaintiesinthosemeasurements.ThePhysicsCoordinatorandrelevantworkinggroupleaderswillfacilitatecross-groupcoordination.

• SupportingtheDUNENearDetectorConceptStudy(seeSection4.6).Thisincludesquantitativeandqualitativeinputderivedfrompastdataandpastexperimentaldesigns,inadditiontoDUNE-specificsimulationsandrelatedstudies.

4.2.8.1 NearDetectorSimulationandReconstructionSub-group

TheNDSimulationandReconstructionsub-grouphasthefollowingresponsibilities:• Development of the ND simulation software, including detector geometries,materials, active

elements,electronics,andphysicslists.• Maintenanceandadvancementofneutrino-nucleusscatteringsimulation,asrequiredbyDUNE

Physicsgroups.• DevelopmentofNDreconstructionalgorithms.• EnsuringNDsimulationandreconstructionsoftwarerunsefficiently (memoryusage,runtime,

storagerequirements).



4.3 Beam Interfaces Working Group TheultimateDUNE sensitivitieswill dependon thedesignof the LBNFneutrinobeamline. TheDUNEcollaborationisresponsibleforprovidingthescientificguidanceonthedesignofthefinalsystem,withtheaimof commencing1.2MWbeamoperationwith anoptimizedneutrinobeamline configuration.WithintheDUNEcollaboration,theBeamInterfacesGroupprovidestheconnectiontotheLBNFbeamlineactivities.TheBIGroupisresponsibleformaintainingthescientificrequirementsfortheneutrinobeamandwillcoordinatetheDUNECollaborationactivitiesrelatedtotheneutrinobeam.

Figure6:TheorganizationalstructureoftheABIWorkingGroup.

4.3.1 BI Coordinators TheBeamInterfaceGroupisledbytwoCo-Coordinators,responsiblefor:

• Determiningthescientificrequirementsfortheneutrinobeam.• Coordinating the collaboration studies to address specific scientific questions as raisedby the

DUNEorLBNFmanagement.• LiaisingwiththeLBNFengineeringdesignteamtoensurethefinalengineeringdesignsmeetthe

physicsrequirementsofLBNF/DUNE.• CoordinatingthecollaborationworkonthescientificrequirementsanddesignofLBNFbeamline.• Liaising with the Long-Baseline Oscillation physics WG on questions relating to the scientific

requirementsforthebeam.• Coordinating with the Long Baseline Physics, Phenomenology and BSM working groups to

investigateadditionalconfigurationsoftheneutrinobeamtoexpandtheDUNEphysicssensitivitytobeyondthestandardthree-flavorneutrinooscillationmodel.

• ProvidinganaccuratepredictionoftheneutrinofluxattheDUNENearandFardetectorsandtheestimate of the systematic uncertainties of the neutrino flux prediction and the near to farextrapolation.

• Definingthescientificrequirementsforthedesignofthemonitorsforthesecondaryhadronandmuonbeams.

• LiaisingwiththeNearDetectorPhysicsWGonquestionsrelatingtothemonitoringoftheneutrinoflux.

• ReportingissuesrelatedtotheLBNFbeamtotheDUNECo-Spokespersons.• ConveningBIWGmeetings.• AttendingtheEFIGmeetings,asrequested.

ABICoordinator+Deputy

BeamSimulation

NeutrinoFluxPredictionandSystematic

Uncertainties

SecondaryBeamMonitors



4.3.2 Beam Simulation Group TheBeamSimulationGroupisresponsiblefortheimplementationofthebeamlineMCsimulationusingthe detailed geometry of the LBNF neutrino beamline produced by the LBNF technical design teamincludingthefocusingelements,andthesimulationoftheneutrinobeamfluxatthenearandfardetector.The simulation groupworkswith the LBNF engineering design team to ensure the latest engineeringdesignsareproperlyimplementedinthesimulationandprovidefeedbackasthetotheengineeringteamandBIGroupasthedesignevolves.TheGroupisresponsibleforthemaintenanceofthesoftwarecodeand for keepinga recordof thedifferent versionsof theneutrinobeamline simulation, as thedesignevolves,orasdifferenttuningconfigurationsarebeingconsidered.

4.3.3 Neutrino Flux Prediction and Systematic Uncertainties The Neutrino Flux Prediction and Systematic Uncertainties Group is responsible for the accuratepredictionoftheneutrinofluxatboththeNearDetectorandtheFarDetector,utilizingwheneverpossibletheavailablehadron-productionmeasurementsforthetuningoftheneutrinobeamlinesimulation.TheGroupwillsetmechanicaltolerancesandalignmentrequirementsforthetarget,thefocusingelementsand the decay volume of the neutrino beamline and will provide an estimate of the systematicuncertaintiesoftheneutrinoflux.

4.3.4 Secondary Beam Monitors TheSecondaryBeamMonitorsGroupisresponsibleforthedefinitionoftherequirementsandthedesignofthemonitorsforthesecondaryhadronandmuonbeams.TheGroupwillsupporttheLBNFbeamlineproject in thedefinitionofabeam-basedalignmentprogramof theneutrinobeamlineelements.TheGroupwillstudypossibleancillarymeasurementsforthecharacterizationofthesecondaryhadronbeamdownstreamofthehornsystem.

4.4 ProtoDUNE-SP ProtoDUNE-SP is a central part of the DUNE collaboration’s detector prototyping effort. It will startoperating at CERN in 2018. It is managed within the DUNE collaboration by three ProtoDUNE-SPcoordinators who report to the overall DUNE collaboration management. ProtoDUNE-SP is a largedetectoreffortinitsownrightanditsorganizationalstructure,showninFigure7,isbasedaroundgroups,primarilybasedatCERN.

ProtoDUNE-SPCoordinators

DetectorConstruction

DetectorIntegration,TestingandInstallation

(DITI)

CryogenicsandArgon

Instrumentation

Cosmic-RayMuonTagger PD-SP

ComputingLiaiason

DataReconstructionandAnalysis

WG

PromptProcessing DAQGroup JointSP/DP

Groups

BeamInstrumentation HVDelivery

SlowControls CryogenicSystems



Figure7:OrganizationalstructureofprotoDUNE-SPgroups.

4.4.1 ProtoDUNE-SP Coordinators Three Co-Coordinators lead protoDUNE-SP. The ProtoDUNE-SP Construction Coordinator acts as thedirectorfortheconstructionofthedetectorcomponents.TheothertwoCo-Coordinatorsareresponsiblefortheinstallation,commissioningandoperationofthedetectoratCERN.AtleastoneoftheprotoDUNE-SPcoordinatorswillberesidentatCERN.TheProtoDUNE-SPConstructionCoordinatorisresponsiblefor:

• Leading the ProtoDUNE-SP Detector Construction Group, which provides the top-levelmanagementoftheconstructionactivitieswithintheinstitutionsparticipatingintheconstructionofprotoDUNE-SP.

• MonitoringthattheproductionandQA/QCprocessesattheproductionsites.• ReportingprogressontheconstructionactivitiestotheDUNEInternationalProjectOffice.• Advising the collaboration management (through the DUNE Technical Coordinator) on any

technicalissuesthatariseduringtheconstruction.TheothertwoProtoDUNE-SPCo-Coordinatorsareresponsiblefor:

• Leading the protoDUNE-SP detector installation, integration and commissioning activities atCERN.

• Communicating the personnel and other resource needs for the protoDUNE-SP installation,integrationandcommissioningtotheDUNETechnicalCoordinator.

• ManagingthecommissioningoftheprotoDUNE-SPdetector.• ManagingtheprotoDUNE-SPscientificactivities.• Makingrecommendationsfortheappointmentsofthecoordinators/convenersoftheprotoDUNE

groupsshowninFigure7.TherecommendationswillbemadeinconsultationwiththeDUNECo-Spokespersons.

• Appointingtheteamleadersthattakeonspecificresponsibilitieswithinthesegroups;• ReportingprogressonprotoDUNE-SPtotheCERNSPSC;• LiaisingwiththeprotoDUNE-DPco-coordinators,toensuretheexploitationofthesynergiesthat

existbetweenthetwoprotoDUNEactivities.

4.4.2 Detector Construction Group The ProtoDUNE-SP Construction Group reports to the ProtoDUNE-SP Construction Coordinator. TheConstructionGroupisresponsibleforthedesign,procurement,fabricationandQA/QCoftheProtoDUNE-SPdetectorelementsthatwillbeinstalledinsidethecryostat.Theseinclude:

• TheDetectorSupportStructure.• AnodePlaneAssemblies.• APAcoldreadoutelectronics.• PhotonDetectorModules(plusreadout).• TheCathodePlane,FieldCagemodulesandconnectionsforhighvoltage.



ThewarmInterfaceelectronicsandsignal feedthroughsarealsotheresponsibilityof theConstructionGroup.TheConstructionGroupisresponsibleforthedeliveryoftheabovedetectorcomponentstoCERNwheretheywillbereceivedandinstalledbytheDITIGroup.

4.4.3 Detector Integration, Testing and Installation (DITI) Group TheDITIgroupisresponsiblefortheplanning,organizationandexecutionatCERNofallactivitiescoveringreception and QC testing of all elements of the TPC, their integration into functional units includingelectronicswhere appropriate, final testing, installation of the complete TPC inside the cryostat, anddeliveryofallauxiliarysystemsfortheoperationoftheexperiment.TheDITIcoordinatorisbasedatCERNandreportsdirectlytotheoverallprotoDUNE-SPcoordinators.TheDITImembershipismadeupofthededicatedteams:

• Installationteam.• Integrationandtest.• Electricalsystemsandcabling.• ComputingInfrastructure.• Groundingandshielding.• Safety(GLIMOS,CERNstaffasperlaboratoryregulations).• APAcommissioning.• HV/CPA/FCcommissioning.• BeamPlugcommissioning.• PhotonDetectionCommissioning.• PhotonElectronicsCommissioning.• ColdElectronicscommissioning.

TheleadersforeachitemorganizetheirpresenceatCERNfortherelevantperiodsoftime,theiron-sitestaff,andtheplanofwork.TheybringinexpertiseintheirareaincludingfromtheconstructionofeachTPCelement.TheDITIgroupwillprovide,togetherwiththeDAQgroup,theplanandleadershipforthecommissioninganddatatakingperiods.

4.4.4 Cryogenics and Argon Instrumentation Group Two co-coordinators, one of whom will be resident at CERN from summer 2017, lead the DetectorInstrumentation Group. The Cryogenics and Argon Instrumentation group comprises distinct teamsresponsiblefortheindividualdetectors/devices:

• Liquidargonpuritymonitors.• GaseousargonpurityanalyzersforH2O,O2,N2tracedetectioningaseousargon.• Temperaturetomeasuretheverticalprofilewithintheliquidargonvolume.• Cryogeniccameraarraytostreamrealtimeimagesoftheinsideofthecryostat.• Pressure,temperatureandlevelmeterprobes.

Inaddition,adedicatedteamliaiseswiththeSlowControlGrouptointegratethereadout,datarecordinganddisplayofthemonitoringsystems.



4.4.5 Cosmic-Ray Muon Tagger Group Twoco-coordinatorsleadtheCosmicMuonTaggerGroupwithspecificresponsibilitiesfordetectoranddetector read-out and electronics. The CMT group is responsible of transportation of the existingscintillatorpaddlestoCERN,assemblyinverticalarrays,installationattheEHN1,integrationintheDAQsystemandcommissioning/operation.Dedicatedsmallteams,partoftheWG,arededicatedto:

• Mechanicalarrangementandinstallation.• Read-outelectronicsandconnectionwithDAQsystem.• CommissioningandoperationofthedetectoratCERN.

4.4.6 ProtoDUNE-SP Computing Liaison TheProtoDUNE-SPComputingLiaisonreportstotheProtoDUNE-SPCoordinatorsandisresponsibleforensuringthatthecomputinginterestsofProtoDUNE-SParerepresentedon:

• TheFermilab/CERN/DUNEinterfacegroup,wherethePD-SPComputingLiaisonisoneofthefivemembersofthisgroup.

• TheCentralProductionGroupwithinDUNEComputing.• TheDataManagementGroupwithinDUNEComputing.

Inaddition, thePD-SPComputing liaison isamemberof the“ProtoDUNE-SPDataReconstructionandAnalysisGroup”andisrequiredtoattendthesemeetingstoremainuptodatewithalltechnicaldetails,datavolumes,expected/necessaryresourcesfortheplannedactivities.Thecomputing liaisonwillalsoprovideguidancetotheprotoDUNE-SPcoordinatorsonthePromptProcessingpath.

4.4.7 Data Reconstruction and Analysis (DRA) Working Group Three co-coordinators, who report directly to the overall protoDUNE-SP coordinators, lead the DRAGROUP.Theco-coordinatorsareresponsibleforplanningandoperationsofthegroup,withoneofthecoordinatorstakingthespecificresponsibilityforleadingthecalibrationactivitiesofProtoDUNE-SP.TheyDRAcoordinatorsprovideadviceandproposalstotheprotoDUNE-SPcoordinatorsonallrelevantmatters,includinginternalorganisation,meetings,andworkshops.TheDRAco-coordinatorswillbeworkcloselywiththeco-coordinatorsoftheDAQgroupinordertoidentifythenecessarycontactandcommunicationchannelsandindividualssoastomakethedatahandlingandprocessingchainseamlessandefficient(e.g.formats,packing-unpackingtools,integritychecks).TheDRAgroupisresponsibleforthehigh-levelalgorithmsusedtoprocesstheprotoDUNE-SPonEOSandall aspects of the analysis programme, leading to the physics and detector performance output fromprotoDUNE-SP.TheresponsibilityfortheDUNE/protoDUNE-SPsimulationandlow-levelreconstructionlieswiththe“SimulationandReconstructionGroup”underPhysicscoordination.TheDRAgroupisalsoresponsibleforthedevelopmentofreconstructiontoolsthatareneededforspecificanalyses,similartothedivisionofresponsibilitieswithinthePhysicsGroups.TheDRAgroupisresponsibleforthedeliveryofthe PD-SP specific aspects, such as the simulation and reconstruction of the cosmic-ray taggers,integration of the beam simulation and the simulation/overlay of cosmic-ray muon and beam halobackgrounds.



TheDRAcoordinatorswillidentify:

• MembersoftheWGtaskedtoleadeachofmainearlyanalysisactivities.• AmemberoftheWGwhotakesresponsibilityfortheintegrationofthePD-SPspecificsimulation

intotheoverallMCeffort.

4.4.8 Prompt Processing (PP) Group ThePromptProcessinggroupisresponsibleforthedesign,implementationandmaintenanceofasystemwhichwillrunanoffline-likereconstructionpathonasub-sampleofdatainsemi-realtime(latencyoffewhours)toaugmenttheonlinemonitoringperformedwithintheDAQsystem.ThePPgroupwillhavetwoco-leaderswhowillreporttotheProtoDUNE-SPcoordinatorsandwillliaisewiththeDAQandDRAgroupleaders. Thepromptprocessingpath shouldnot imposeanyadditional constraintsoneither theDAQsystemorontheprotoDUNE-SPreconstructionsoftware.ThePPgroupischargedtodevelopthefacilityinfrastructureandsoftwaretodeliverfunctionalitydefinedbytheProtoDUNE-SPleadership.Thegroupischargedtodeliveraworkingsystemforthestartofdatataking,whichwillallowtheextractionofalimitednumberofkeydetectorperformanceparameters.Tooptimiseresources,thePromptProcessingpathwilldrawheavilyonexistingjobmanagementsystems,LArSoftandotherrelevantDUNEofflinesoftware.The fraction of events sampled and level of reconstruction sophistication will be optimised for thecomputing resourcesavailable.TheprotoDUNE-SPcoordinatorswilldefine theprecise scopeofwork.However,itwasagreedthatthepromptprocessingshouldbebasedon:

• Alatencyofapproximatelyonehour.• InputdatafromEOS.• TheassumptionisthatthepromptprocessingwillusetheCERNTier-0,withtheNeutrinoPlatform

cluster being a possible alternative provided it incurs no overhead in additional resources(financialorpersonnel).

4.4.9 DAQ Group Twoco-coordinators,whoreportdirectlytotheoverallprotoDUNE-SPcoordinators,leadtheProtoDUNE-SPDAQgroup.Theco-coordinatorsareresponsibleforplanningandoperationsofthegrouptowardsthedesign,delivery,testing,commissioningandoperationofthefullDAQsystem.TheDAQscopecoversallaspects of data handling between, and including, the output of theWIB/SSP and the dedicated datastorage in theDAQ system, fromwhich the datawill be transferred to EOS. TheDAQ systemand itselementshavebeendesignedtohandleanacquisitionrateof25Hzassumingafactoroffour loss-lessdatacompression.TheDAQco-coordinatorsmaintaintheinternalmilestonesofthegroup,inaccordancewiththehigh-levelprotoDUNE-SPschedule.TheDAQcoordinatorsprovideadviceandproposalstotheprotoDUNE-SPcoordinatorsonallrelevantmatters,includinginternalorganisation,meetings,workshops,and demonstrator systems. The co-coordinators are responsible for representing the DAQ group in



reviewsand followingupon theiroutcomes.Themainactivitieswithin theDAQGroup,eachunderadesignatedlead,are:

• TPCreadoutusingtheRCE(baselinesolution)toreadoutthefulldetector.• TPC readout using FELIX (development solution), to be implemented on one APA when its

functionalityisfullydemonstrated.• PhotonDetectorReadout.• RunControlandSystemsMonitoringframeworkandtools.• DataQualityMonitoring.• TriggersystemusingBeamInstrumentationdetectorsandtheMuonMonitors.• Timingsystem.

4.4.10 Joint Single-Phase/Dual-Phase Groups There are several groupswhose activities apply tobothprotoDUNE-SP andprotoDUNE-DP, describedbelow.ThesegroupsreporttoboththeprotoDUNE-SPandprotoDUNE-DPcoordinators.

4.4.10.1 BeamConfigurationandInstrumentationGroup

TheBeamConfigurationandInstrumentationGroupworksinclosecollaborationwithCERNEN-EAgroupwhodesignanddeliverthebeamlines.Itisresponsiblefortheensuringthatthetertiarycharged-particlebeamdelivered to theprotoDUNEdetectors is suitable for the scientificgoalsand that thebeam-lineinstrumentationprovidestheappropriatelevelofmonitoring.Threeco-conveners,jointlyappointedbytheSPandDPcoordinators,leadtheBeamConfigurationandInstrumentationGroup.OneconveneractsasmainliaisontotheactivitiesoftheCERNEN-EAgroup(beam-linelayoutandthebeaminstrumentationelements provided by CERN. The other two conveners provide the liaison to the protoDUNE-SP andprotoDUNE-DP coordinators to ensure effective communication with regards of the needs of theexperiment.

4.4.10.2 HVDeliveryGroupTwoco-conveners,respectivelyrepresentingtheDPandSPprotoDUNEdetectors,leadtheHVDeliveryGroup. The objective of the group is the development, procurement and implementation of the HVsystemsforthetwoprotoDUNEdetectors,withtheaimofdeployingacommondesign.TheHVDeliverygroupisresponsiblefortheHVchain:HVpowersupply;HVcables;HVfeed-thoughandtheHVmonitoringsystem.ThisisassumedtobeidenticalforprotoDUNESPandDP.

4.4.10.3 SlowControlsGroupThreeco-conveners,representingrespectivelyprotoDUNE-SP,protoDUNE-DPandCERN, leadtheSlowControlsGroup. The scope of the SlowControls group includes the design, procurement, fabrication,testing, and delivery of a comprehensive detectormonitoring, control and safety system, based on acommon architecture for protoDUNE-SP and protoDUNE-DP. The protoDUNE-SP and protoDUNE-DPgroupsare responsible for thedevices installedandcabled inside thecryostat, thesensorsneeded tomonitorthecryostatanditscontent.CERNisresponsiblefortheimplementationofthecontrolsystem



elementsoutsidethecryostat (hardware,firmwareandsoftware), includingthehigh-voltageand low-voltagepowersuppliesnecessaryforthedetectoroperation.

4.4.10.4 CryogenicSystemsandInstrumentation

TheCryogenicSystemsand InstrumentationGroup is responsible for theprotoDUNEdetector-specificelementsofthecryogenicsystemsandinstrumentationandforliaisingcloselywiththeCryogenicSystemsteamprovidedbytheCERNNeutrinoPlatform.

4.5 ProtoDUNE-DP ProtoDUNE-DP is a central part of the DUNE collaboration’s detector prototyping effort. It will startoperating at CERN in 2018. It is managed within the DUNE collaboration by two ProtoDUNE-DPcoordinators who report to the overall DUNE collaboration management. ProtoDUNE-DP is a largedetectoreffortinitsownrightanditsorganizationalstructureisbuiltaroundgroups,primarilybasedatCERN.TheorganizationofprotoDUNE-DP(originallyWA105)pre-datestheformationoftheDUNEcollaboration.WA105isrecognizedasaCERNexperiment,whichincorporatesprotoDUNE-DP(the6x6x6m3dual-phasedemonstrator)anda3x1x1m3pilotdetector.ThiscombinedeffortisledbytheWA105SpokespersonandWA105hasretainedanInstitutionalBoardofallparticipatinginstitutions.Nevertheless,all institutionsparticipatinginprotoDUNE-DParemembersoftheDUNEcollaborationandtheprotoDUNE-DPactivitiesaremanagedwithintheDUNEcollaborationorganizationalstructure.

4.5.1 ProtoDUNE-DP Coordinators TwoCo-CoordinatorsleadprotoDUNE-DP.OneoftheCo-CoordinatorschairstheprotoDUNE-DPTechnicalBoard,whichisresponsibleforthedetectorconstructionactivities.TheotherCo-CoordinatorchairstheScientificBoard,whichisresponsiblefortheresponsibleforthescientificfollowupoftheprotoDUNE-DPactivities.TheProtoDUNE-DPCo-Coordinator(TechnicalBoardChair)isresponsiblefor:

• Leading the ProtoDUNE-DP Detector Construction Group, which provides the top-levelmanagementoftheconstructionactivitieswithintheinstitutionsparticipatingintheconstructionofprotoDUNE-DP.

• MonitoringthattheproductionandQA/QCprocessesattheproductionsites.• ReportingprogressontheconstructionactivitiestotheDUNEInternationalProjectOffice.• Advising the collaboration management (through the DUNE Technical Coordinator) on any

technicalissuesthatariseduringtheconstruction.• LeadingtheprotoDUNE-DPdetectorinstallation,integrationandcommissioningactivities.• Communicating the personnel and other resource needs for the protoDUNE-DP installation,

integrationandcommissioningtotheDUNETechnicalCoordinator.• ManagingthecommissioningoftheprotoDUNE-DPdetector.



• ReportingtechnicalprogressonprotoDUNE-DPtotheCERNSPSC;• LiaisingwiththeprotoDUNE-SPco-coordinators,toensuretheexploitationofthesynergiesthat

existbetweenthetwoprotoDUNEactivities.TheProtoDUNE-DPCo-Coordinator(ScientificBoardChair)isresponsiblefor:

• ManagingtheprotoDUNE-DPscientificactivities.• ReportingscientificprogressonprotoDUNE-DPtotheCERNSPSC;• LiaisingwiththeprotoDUNE-SPco-coordinators,toensuretheexploitationofthesynergiesthat

existbetweenthetwoprotoDUNEactivities.

4.5.2 6x6x6 EHN1 Integration Group The6x6x6EHN1IntegrationGroupisresponsibleformanagingtheprotoDUNE-DPdetectorinstallationandintegrationactivitiesinEHN1.

4.5.3 3x1x1 Operations Group The3x1x1m3dual-phasepilotdetectorwillcommenceoperationsearlyin2017.The3x1x1OperationsGroup is responsible for managing the commissioning and data taking of the 3x1x1 pilot detector,includingtheorganizationofshifts.

4.5.4 Joint Dual-Phase/Single-Phase Groups ThereareseveralgroupswhoseactivitiesapplytobothprotoDUNE-SPandprotoDUNE-DP.Thesegroupsreport to both the protoDUNE-SP and protoDUNE-DP coordinators. The joint groups are described inSection4.4.10.

4.6 Near Detector Concept Study TheNearDetectorWorkingGroupwassetuptocoordinatethecollaborationneardetectoreffortsfortheDOECD-1-Rreview,basedontheexistingFine-GrainedTrackerconceptdevelopedinthecontextofLBNE.In2017thecollaborationmanagementlaunchedtheNearDetectorConceptStudywiththegoalofconvergingon an agreedDUNE collaboration concept for thenear detector. To reflect this change inemphasis, theNearDetectorWorkingGrouphasbeen replacedby theNearDetectorConcept Study,whichwillbeledbythetwoNearDetectorCoordinators.TheoriginalgoaloftheNearDetectorConceptStudyistoreachcollaborationagreementonaproposedconceptfortheDUNENearDetectorbytheendof2017.ThisdeadlinehasnowbeenextendedtoMay2018.ThiscouldbetheexistingFine-GrainedTrackerconcept,aLiquidArgonTPC,asystembasedaroundhigh-pressuregaseousargonTPC,orahybridsystem.TheNearDetectorConceptStudywillencompassmembersoftheDUNEcollaborationwithaninterestintheNearDetector.ThefocusoftheNearDetectorConceptStudyisonthedesignofthedetector.The final choice of the DUNE Near Detector concept will account for the technical and scientificarguments, but will also be driven by the interests of the collaboration and the likely availability of



resources(whichcouldbetiedtothetechnologychoice).Theagreementofconstructionresponsibilitieswilldevelopintime,buttoproceedwithanewconcept,thereshouldbeaplausiblefundingmodel.Thestudywillnotconsiderindetailthenearsitefacilityinfrastructure.TheforeseentimelinefortheNearDetectorConceptStudyis:

• Feb2017:CallforexpressionsofinterestintheNDConceptStudy.• Mar2017:three-dayDUNENDWorkshop(27th–29thMarch)atFermilab.• May2017collaborationmeeting:agreeontwo/threeoptionsforfurtherconsideration.• Jun2017:three-dayDUNENDworkshoptoreviewanddocumentthepros/consofeachoption

andtoconsiderthepossiblefundingmodel.• Nov2017:two-dayDUNENDworkshoptoreviewprogressanddocumentnextsteps.• Mar2018:three-dayDUNENDworkshoptoreviewprogressandconsiderrecommendations.• May2018:agreementonasingleproposedconceptfortheDUNENearDetector.

AttheendofthistimeacallforExpressionsofInterestintheNearDetectorconstructionwillbemadeandtheNearDetectorConceptStudywillbereplacedbyanewlyformedNearDetectorTechnicalBoard.TheplanfortheperiodOctober2017–May2018isdescribedindune-doc-5831.

4.6.1 Updated Charge to the Near Detector Concept Study Thechargeforthestudyisto:

• DevelopaproposalfortheDUNEneardetectorconceptbyMay2018.Thestudyshould:

• EnsurethattheproposedneardetectorconceptmeetstherequirementsoftheprimaryscientificgoalsofDUNE.

• AssumeasingleneardetectorhallofasimilarsizetotheCD-1-Rdesign,locatedatadistanceofbetween360mand575mfromthetarget.

• Presentaplausible fundingmodel for theproposedconcept,basedonthe interestsand likelycontributionstothedetectorconstructionfromtheinternationalcollaboration.

• FocussolelyonthedesignoftheNearDetector;thescopeofthestudydoesnotextendtothedesignoftheLBNFnearsitefacility.

4.6.2 Roles and Responsibilities of the Near Detector Coordinators Twoco-coordinators leadtheNearDetectorConceptStudy.Theyareresponsible forcoordinatingtheactivitiesoftheNearDetectorConceptStudyaccordingtothetimelineoutlinedabove.Specifically,theyareresponsiblefor:

• OrganizationoftheNearDetectorConceptworkshops.• Steeringtheprocessofinitiallyagreeingtwoorthreepossibleconceptsforfurtherstudy.• Liaisingwith theNearDetector physicsworking group conveners to ensure that the detector

conceptdiscussionsarealignedwiththephysicsgoalsofDUNE.• LiaisingwiththePhysicsCoordinatorsandLongBaselineNeutrinoOscillationsgroupconveners

toensurethatthetoolsneededtosupportthestudyaredevelopedonanappropriatetimescale.



• WorkingwiththeCo-SpokespersonstoincreasetheengagementfrompotentialnewinstitutionswithaninterestintheDUNENearDetectorconstruction.

• SteeringtheprocessofconvergingonasingleproposedNearDetectorconceptbyMay2018.• CollectinganyquestionsrelatingtothefacilityandforwardingthemtotheCo-Spokespersonsfor

considerationeitherbyLBNForwithintheEFIG.TheNearDetectorConceptStudy leaderswillmakerecommendations (onbehalfof thegroup)totheDUNEEC,whichwilltakethefinaldecisions.

DUNEAppointments


5 DUNE APPOINTMENTS ThissectionliststhecurrentholdersofallDUNEelectedandappointedcollaborationpositions.Italsoliststheappointmentprocedureand theendof thecurrentperiodof tenure. Inmakingappointments tocollaboration position, DUNE is committed to promoting diversity and inclusion at all levels of thecollaboration:

• InconsiderationofallappointmentstoDUNEcollaborationpositions,DUNEexercisesastrictnon-discriminationpolicy.

• Thepromotionofdiversity,genderbalanceandregionalbalancewillbetakenintoconsiderationincaseswheretherearetwoormoreequallymeritoriouscandidates.

5.1 Management Team Co-Spokespersons

StefanSöldner-Rembold,UniversityofManchester (March2020)EdBlucher,UniversityofChicago (March2019)

Co-Spokespersons are elected by the collaboration according to the rules set out in the DUNECollaborationGovernanceDocumentandapprovedbythehostlaboratoryDirector.Appointmentsarefortwoyears,renewable(byelection)foramaximumoftwoterms.TechnicalCoordinator

EricJames,FNAL (April2018)JointlyappointedbytheCo-Spokespersonsandhost laboratoryDirector.Theappointment isreviewedevery twoyearsby theCo-Spokespersonsandhost laboratoryDirector,with theexpectation that theappointmentsareusuallycontinued.ResourceCoordinator

AmiDave,FNAL (April2018)JointlyappointedbytheCo-Spokespersonsandhost laboratoryDirector.Theappointment isreviewedevery twoyearsby theCo-Spokespersonsandhost laboratoryDirector,with theexpectation that theappointmentsareusuallycontinued.

5.2 Institutional Board Chair and Deputy IBChair

RobertWilson,ColoradoStateUniversity (January2019)ElectedbytheInstitutionalBoardforatwo-yearterm.Thereisnolimitonthenumberofterms.IBViceChair(optionalposition)

LisaWhiteheadKoerner,UniversityofHouston (January2019)ProposedbytheIBchairandapprovedbytheIB.ThetermisthesameasthatoftheIBChair.

DUNEAppointments


5.3 Co-Spokespersons Advisory Group TBD

5.4 Far Detector Consortia Leadership ProposedbytheCo-SpokespersonsandapprovedbytheExecutiveCommittee.

5.4.1 APA Consortium ConsortiumLeader

StefanSöldner-Rembold,UniversityofManchester (September2019)TechnicalLead

AlbertoMarchionni,FNAL (September2019)

5.4.2 Single-Phase TPC Electronics ConsortiumLeader

DavidChristian,FNAL (September2019)TechnicalLead

MarcoVerzocchi,FNAL (September2019)

5.4.3 Single-Phase Photon Detection System ConsortiumLeader

EttoreSegreto,UniversityofCampinas (September2019)TechnicalLead

DaveWarner,ColoradoStateUniversity (September2019)

5.4.4 DAQ ConsortiumLeader

DaveNewbold,UniversityofBristol (September2019)TechnicalLead

GeorgiaKaragiori,ColumbiaUniversity (September2019)

5.4.5 HV System (Field Cage, Cathode Planes, HV Feedthrough) ConsortiumLeader

FrancescoPietropaolo,CERN (September2019)TechnicalLead

BoYu,BNL (September2019)

DUNEAppointments


5.4.6 Slow Controls and Cryogenic Instrumentation ConsortiumLeader

SowjanyaGollapinni,UniversityofTennesseeatKnoxville (September2019)TechnicalLead

AnselmoCervera,Valencia (September2019)

5.4.7 CRP Consortium ConsortiumLeader(Interim)

DominiqueDuchesneau,LAPP (May2018)TechnicalLead

TBD

5.4.8 Dual-Phase TPC Electronics Consortium ConsortiumLeader

DarioAutiero,IPNL (September2019)TechnicalLead

TakuyaHasegawa,KEK (September2019)

5.4.9 Dual-Phase Photon Detection System Consortium ConsortiumLeader

InesGilBotella,CIEMAT (September2019)TechnicalLead

DominiqueDuchesneau,LAPP (September2019)

5.5 DUNE Coordination Roles

5.5.1 Computing ComputingCoordinator(HostLaboratory) AndrewNorman,FNAL (September2018)ComputingCoordinator(External)

HeidiSchellman,OregonStateUniversity (September2019) ProposedbytheCo-SpokespersonsandapprovedbytheExecutiveBoard.Thetermisfortwoyears.TomaintainastrongconnectionwiththeFermilabComputingSector,oneoftheComputingCoordinatorswillbeaFermilabemployee.Toprovidecontinuity,theexpectationisthatthehostlaboratoryComputingCoordinatorusuallywillbere-appointedattheendofhis/hertwo-yeartenure.TheexternalComputingCoordinatorisappointedforatwo-yearperiodandusuallywillnotbeaFermilabemployee.

DUNEAppointments


5.5.2 Physics PhysicsCoordinator

RyanPatterson,Caltech (September2018)DeputyPhysicsCoordinator

ElizabethWorcester,BNL (September2019)ProposedbytheCo-SpokespersonsandapprovedbytheExecutiveBoard.Thetermisfortwoyears(oneasDeputyPhysicsCoordinator,followedbyoneasPhysicsCoordinator).

5.5.3 Beam Interface BIGroupCo-Coordinators LauraFields(FNAL) (September2019)

ZarkoPavlovic(FNAL) (September2019)ProposedbytheCo-SpokespersonsandapprovedbytheExecutiveBoard.Thetermisfortwoyears.

5.5.4 Near Detector NearDetectorCoordinator(s) Kam-BiuLuk,UCBerkeley (September2018) AlfonsWeber,UniversityofOxfordandSTFC-RAL (September2018)Proposedby theCo-SpokespersonsandTechnicalCoordinator.Approvedby theExecutiveBoard.Thetermisfortwoyears.AtthetimewhentheNearDetectorconsortiaareinplace,thisrolewillceasetoexist.

5.5.5 ProtoDUNE-DP ProtoDUNE-DPCoordinators

DarioAutiero,IPNLLyon (September2018)TakuyaHasagawa,KEK (September2018)DominicDuchesneau,LAPP (September2018)

Proposedby theCo-SpokespersonsandTechnicalCoordinator.Approvedby theExecutiveBoard.Thetermisfortwoyears(renewable).

ProtoDUNE-DPComputingLiaison ElisabettaPennacchio,IPNL (September2018)ProposedbytheProtoDUNE-DPCoordinators.ApprovedbytheExecutiveBoard.Thetermisfortwoyears.

5.5.6 ProtoDUNE-SP ProtoDUNE-SPCoordinators FlavioCavanna,FNAL (September2018) GinaRameika,FNAL (September2018)

DUNEAppointments


ChristosTouramanis,UniversityofLiverpool (September2018)Proposedby theCo-SpokespersonsandTechnicalCoordinator.Approvedby theExecutiveBoard.Thetermisfortwoyears(renewable).ProtoDUNE-SPComputingLiaison RuthPordes,FNAL (September2018)ProposedbytheProtoDUNE-SPCoordinators.ApprovedbytheExecutiveBoard.Thetermisfortwoyears.

5.6 DUNE Working Groups Conveners/CoordinatorsofDUNEworkinggroupsareappointedfortwoyears(renewable).

5.6.1 Computing The conveners of the Computing working groups are proposed by the Computing Coordinators inconsultation with the Co-Spokespersons. The DUNE Executive Board approves appointments. TheorganizationofDUNEcomputingwasrevisedinJanuary2017andtheworkinggroupleadershiprolesarecurrentlybeingconsidered.SoftwareManagementTeamLeader ThomasJunk,FNAL (September2019) DavidAdams,BNL (September2019)

ChristophAlt,ETHZurich (September2019)

DataManagementTeamLeader SteveTimm,FNAL (September2019) AdamAurisano,Cincinnatti (September2019)ProductionTeamLeader AnnaMazzacane,FNAL (September2019) IvanFuric,UniversityofFlorida (September2019)DatabaseTeamLeader JonathanPaley,FNAL (September2019) CharlesLane,Drexel (September2019)CollaborativeToolsTeamLeader ElaineBerman,FNAL (September2019)

DUNEAppointments


5.6.2 Physics TheconvenersoftheComputingworkinggroupsareproposedbythePhysicsCoordinatorandDeputyCoordinator, in consultation with the Co-Spokespersons. The DUNE Executive Board approvesappointments.FarDetectorSimulation/Reconstruction AlexHimmel,FNAL (September2018) ChrisBackhouse,UCL (September2019)TingjunYang,FNAL (September2019)Long-BaselineNeutrinoOscillations MattBass,BNL (September2019) MaylySanchez,IowaStateUniversity (September2019)

DanCherdack,ColoradoStateUniversity(FittingMachinery) (September2019)Low-EnergyandSupernovaBurstNeutrinos KateScholberg,DukeUniversity (September2019) InesGilBotella,CIEMAT (September2019) AlexFriedland,SLAC(Phenomenology) (September2019)High-EnergyNeutrinosandNucleonDecay LisaWhiteheadKoerner,UniversityofHouston (September2019) GregPawloski,UniversityofMinnesota (September2019) VitalyKudryavtsev,UniversityofSheffield (September2019)BSM/Exotics JaehoonYu,UniversityofTexasArlington (September2019) AlexSousa,UniversityofCincinnati (September2019)NearDetectorPhysics SteveManly,UniversityofRochester (September2018) MikeKordosky,WilliamandMary (September2018)

5.6.3 ProtoDUNE-SP TheleadersoftheProtoDUNE-SPgroupsareproposedbytheProtoDUNE-SPCoordinatorsinconsultationwith the Technical Coordinator and Co-Spokespersons. The DUNE Executive Board approvesappointments.DetectorConstructionGroupCoordinator GinaRameika,FNAL (September2018)

DUNEAppointments


DetectorIntegration,TestingandInstallationCoordinator RobertoAcciarri,FNAL (September2018)CryogenicsandArgonInstrumentation StephenPordes,FNAL (September2018) AnselmoCervera,Valencia (September2018)Cosmic-RayMuonTaggerCoordinator EdBlucher,UniversityofChicago (September2018) JonathanLink,VirginiaTech. (September2018)DAQCoordinators KarolHennessy,UniversityofLiverpool (September2018) GiovannaLehmannMiotto,CERN (September2018)DataReconstructionandAnalysisCoordinators JoshKlein,UniversityofPennsylvania (September2018)

ThomasKutter,LouisianaStateUniversity (September2018) RobertSulej,FNAL/NCBJ (September2018)PromptProcessingCoordinators MaximPotekhin,BNL (September2018) BrettViren,BNL (September2018)

5.6.4 ProtoDUNE-DP TheleadersoftheProtoDUNE-DPgroupsareproposedbytheProtoDUNE-DPCoordinatorsinconsultationwith the Technical Coordinator and Co-Spokespersons. The DUNE Executive Board approvesappointments.6x6x6EHN1IntegrationGroup SebastienMurphy,ETHZ (September2018) DominqueDuchesneau,LAPP (September2018)3x1x1OperationsGroup LauraMolinaBueno,ETHZ (September2018) LauraManenti,UCL (September2018)

DUNEAppointments


5.6.5 Joint ProtoDUNE-SP/ProtoDUNE-DP TheProtoDUNE-SPandProtoDUNE-DPCoordinatorsproposetheleadersofthejointProtoDUNE-SP/-DPgroupsinconsultationwiththeTechnicalCoordinatorandCo-Spokespersons.TheDUNEExecutiveBoardapprovesappointments.BeamConfigurationandInstrumentationCoordinators YannisKaryotakis,LAPP (September2018) JonathanPaley,FNAL (September2018) PaolaSala,CERN (September2018)SlowControlsCoordinators AnselmoCervera,Valencia (September2018) GiovannaLehmannMiotto,CERN (September2018) YannRigaut,ETHZ (September2018)CryogenicSystemsandInstrumentation LauraManenti,UCL (September2018) DavidMontanari,FNAL (September2018) StephenPordes,FNAL (September2018)HVDelivery SarahLockwitz,FNAL (September2018) LauraMolinaBueno,ETHZ (September2018)

5.7 Technical Design Report Editorial Teams TheDUNETechnicalDesignReportswillbedeliveredin2019fortheLBNCreviewoftheinternationalDUNEproject.Ahigh-levelsummaryoftheTDRplansisgivenindune-doc-6062.

5.7.1 Central Editorial Team Editors TimBolton,KansasStateUniversity (September2019) SamZeller,FNAL (September2019)TechnicalEditor AnneHeavey,FNAL (September2019)

5.7.2 Volume Editors Volume1:ExecutiveSummary Co-spokespersons

DUNEAppointments


Volume2:Physics AlbertdeRoeck,CERN (September2019) JonUrheim,UniversityofIndiana (September2019)Volume3:Single-PhaseFarDetector:Overview TimBolton,KansasStateUniversity (September2019) SamZeller,FNAL (September2019)Volume3A:FD-SPAnodePlaneAssemblies

DavidSchmitz,UniversityofChicago (September2019)Volume3B:FD-SPHigh-VoltageSystem

RobPlunkett,FNAL (September2019)Volume3C:FD-SPTPCElectronics

MichaelMooney,ColoradoStateUniversity (September2019)Volume3D:FD-SPPhotonDetectionSystem

RobertWilson,ColoradoStateUniversity (September2019)Volume3E:FD-SPDAQ JimBrooke,UniversityofBristol (September2019) BrettViren,BNL (September2019)Volume3F:FD-SPSlowControlsandCryogenicInstrumentation

GlennHorton-Smith,KansasStateUniversity (September2019) CarmenPalormares,CIEMAT (September2019)Volume3G:FD-DPTechnicalCoordination,InstallationandIntegrationVolume4:Dual-PhaseFarDetector:Overview TimBolton,KansasStateUniversity (September2019) SamZeller,FNAL (September2019)Volume4A:FD-DPChargeReadoutPlanesVolume4B:FD-DPHigh-VoltageSystemVolume4C:FD-DPTPCElectronics

SlavicGalymov,IPNL (September2019)JamieDawson,APCParis (September2019)

Volume4D:FD-DPPhotonDetectionSystemBurakBilki,IowaUniversity (September2019)ClaraCuesta,CIEMAT (September2019)

Volume4E:FD-DPDAQ JimBrooke,UniversityofBristol (September2019) BrettViren,BNL (September2019)Volume4F:FD-DPSlowControlsandCryogenicInstrumentation

GlennHorton-Smith,KansasStateUniversity (September2019)CarmenPalormares,CIEMAT (September2019)

Volume4G:FD-DPTechnicalCoordination,InstallationandIntegration

DUNEAppointments


5.8 Active Task Forces TaskForcearefixed-durationeffortstaskforceswerecreatedinSeptember2015toadvancethreeareasconsideredtobeofhighpriorityfortheplannedTDR.Thesehavenowcompletedtheirwork.InAugust2017,theCalibrationTaskForcewasstoodup.ThetaskforcewilldeliveritsreportbyMarch2018(TBD).

5.8.1 Calibration Task Force Thechargeofthecalibrationtaskforceis:

• tounderstandanddocumenttherequirementsforthecalibrationofthefardetectorbasedonthephysicsneeds,forexampletheimpactontheoscillationphysicsprogram;

• todevelopthefardetectorcalibrationstrategythatwillbepresentedintheTDR,clarifyingtheassumptionsabouteachsourceofsystematicuncertaintyandhowitwillbeconstrained.

Inaddition,thecalibrationtaskforceischargedto:• makearecommendationonthecalibrationhardwarefortheTechnicalProposal(May2018).

TaskForceLeaders SowjanyaGollapinni,UniversityofTennesseeatKnoxville (September2019) KendallMahn,MichiganStateUniversity (September2019)TaskForceLeadersareappointedbytheCo-Spokespersons.

5.9 Other Committees

5.9.1 Authorship and Publications Board (APB) Chair TimBolton,KansasStateUniversity (September2019)DeputyChair

JohnLoSecco,NotreDame (September2018) TheChairandDeputyareappointedbytheCo-Spokespersons.Members(TBD)

JonUrheim,UniversityofIndiana (September2019)FrankFilthaut,RadboudUniversity (September2019)TakuyaHasegawa,KEK (September2019)InaSarcevic,UniversityofArizona (September2019)AlbertoGago,PUCP (September2019)

ThemembersarerecommendedbytheChairandconfirmedbytheExecutiveBoard.

5.9.2 Speakers Committee Chair

DUNEAppointments


ThomasPatzak,APC,Paris (September2019)DeputyChair JarekNowak,LancasterUniversity (September2019)TheChairandDeputyareappointedbytheCo-Spokespersons.Members

ErnestoKemp,TakuyaHasagawa,AlexSousa,AlessandraTonazzo,UmaSanker,JianmingBian,AlexHimmel,BobSvoboda,JasonStock(YoungDUNE),KeithGollwitzer(LBNF).

Ex-OfficioCo-Spokespersons,PhysicsCoordinatorandDeputy,ChairofAPBandDeputy

The(non-ex-officio)membersarerecommendedbytheChairandconfirmedbytheExecutiveBoard.

deep underground neutrino experiment management plan – v1 ... · deep underground neutrino...

Documents