deductive argument

32
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT

Upload: lyre

Post on 14-Feb-2016

65 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Deductive argument. Let’s Review. Induction vs. deduction. Induction : inference of a generalized conclusion from particular instances  Deduction : inference in which the conclusion about particulars follows necessarily from general or universal premises. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Deductive argument

DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT

Page 2: Deductive argument

LET’S REVIEW.

Page 3: Deductive argument

Induction: inference of a generalized conclusion from particular instances 

Deduction: inference in which the conclusion about particulars follows necessarily from general or universal premises

INDUCTION VS. DEDUCTION

Page 4: Deductive argument

NOTE #1:YOU ARE GOING TO

HATE TODAY’S LESSON.

Page 5: Deductive argument

NOTE #2:DON’T WORRY

ABOUT NAMES. JUST TRY TO THINK WITH

VENN DIAGRAMS.

Page 6: Deductive argument

PART I:VENN DIAGRAMS

WITH OVERLAP

Page 7: Deductive argument

FIRST WE DRAW THE VENN DIAGRAM.

Page 8: Deductive argument

All p are q.All q are r.Therefore all p are r.

All Boston folk are from Massachusetts.All Massachusetts folk are from America.All Boston folk are from America.

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM

Page 9: Deductive argument

If p, then q.If q, then r.Therefore, if p, then r.

If Sam is from Boston, then he is from Massachusetts.

If he is from Massachusetts, then he is from America.

Therefore, if Sam is from Boston, then he is from America.

HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM

Page 10: Deductive argument

They’re basically the same.

WHAT’S THE RELATIONSHIP?

Page 11: Deductive argument

NEXT WE FIND OUT WHERE WE ARE IN

THE VENN DIAGRAM.

Page 12: Deductive argument

If p, then q.P.Therefore q.

If it is a dog, then it is a mammal.It is a dog.Therefore it is a mammal.

MODUS PONENDO PONENS

Page 13: Deductive argument

If p, then q.Not q.Therefore p.

If it is a dog, then it is a mammal.It is not a mammal.Therefore it is not a dog.

MODUS TOLLENDO TOLLENS (CONTRAPOSITIVE)

Page 14: Deductive argument

FALLACY TEST!!!

Page 15: Deductive argument

If p, then q.Q.Therefore p.

If it is a dog, then it is a mammal.It is a mammal.Therefore it is a dog.

What if it’s a bear? Bears are mammals.

CONVERSE FALLACY(AFFIRMING THE CONSEQUENT)

Page 16: Deductive argument

If p, then q.Not p.Therefore not q.

If it is a dog, then it is a mammal.It is not a dog.Therefore it is not a mammal.

What if it’s a bear? Bears are mammals.

INVERSE FALLACY(DENYING THE ANTECEDENT)

Page 17: Deductive argument

FINALLY WE PUT IT ALL TOGETHER.

Page 18: Deductive argument

If p, then q.If q, then r.Therefore, if p, then r.P.Therefore r.

If it is a dog, then it is a mammal.If it is a mammal, then it is an animal.Therefore, if it is a dog, then it is an animal.It is a dog.Therefore it is an animal.

PUT IT ALL TOGETHER!

Page 19: Deductive argument

PART II:VENN DIAGRAMS

WITHOUT OVERLAP

Page 20: Deductive argument

NOTE #3:EACH OF THESE

ARGUMENTS HAS A CONTRAPOSITIVE

VERSION. BUT WE’RE GOING TO FOCUS ON

THE POSITIVE.

Page 21: Deductive argument

FIRST WE DRAW THE VENN DIAGRAM.

Page 22: Deductive argument

Either p or q. If p, then r. If q, then s.Therefore either r or s.

Abdulhaye’s first language is either Darija or Tashlhit. If Abdulhaye’s first language is Darija, then he is

Arab. If Abdulhaye’s first language is Tashlhit, then he is

Tamazight.Therefore Abdulhaye is either Arab or Tamazight.

[CONSTRUCTIVE] DILEMMA

Page 23: Deductive argument

LET’S CREATE SOME DILEMMAS!

Page 24: Deductive argument

NEXT WE FIND OUT WHERE WE ARE IN

THE VENN DIAGRAM.

Page 25: Deductive argument

Either p or q.Not p.Therefore q.

Abdulhaye’s first language is either Darija or Tashlhit. It is not Darija.Therefore it is Tashlhit.

MODUS TOLLENDO PONENS(DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM)

Page 26: Deductive argument

FINALLY WE PUT IT ALL TOGETHER.

Page 27: Deductive argument

Either p or q. If p, then r. If q, then s.Therefore either r or s.Not p.Therefore q.

Either we legalize prostitution or we keep it i llegal. If we legalize prostitution, we would be breaking Islamic

law! If we keep prostitution illegal, we maintain our Islamic

values.Therefore either we break Islamic law or we remain Islamic.Let’s not break Islamic law by legalizing prostitution.Therefore let’s remain Islamic by keeping it illegal.

PUT IT ALL TOGETHER!

Page 28: Deductive argument

NOTE #4:BE WARY OF FALSE

DILEMMAS AND “REDUCTIONS TO

THE ABSURD.”

Page 29: Deductive argument

REWORK YOUR DILEMMAS

Page 30: Deductive argument

USING BOTH TYPES OF ARGUMENT AT

THE SAME TIME

Page 31: Deductive argument

Homework.

READ CHAPTER 5 IN THE DEBATER’S

GUIDE.

FOR TOMORROW, PROVE USING DEDUCTION...

Page 32: Deductive argument

1. Prove by creating your own hypothetical syllogism and modus ponendo ponens: It is wrong for a man to have more than one wife.

2. Prove by creating your own dilemma and modus tollendo ponens: Morocco should be friends with North Korea.

3. Draw Venn diagrams for your arguments in (1) and (2).4. What is wrong with this argument?... If the government

cuts taxes, then the economy will improve. The economy improved. Therefore the government cut taxes

5. If the government invests in education, then more Moroccans have access to education. Does this mean that government investment causes the increase in access?

6. Make an analogy between the human body and human society.

HOMEWORK