decision support systems

52
Decision Support Systems Sistem Penunjang Keputusan

Upload: eagan-wolf

Post on 13-Mar-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Decision Support Systems. Sistem Penunjang Keputusan. Decision Making. Whom do we intend to support? In what capacity? In what context?. Decision Making. Managerial Activity (Chapter 1) Objectives -- After studying this chapter, you should be able to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Decision Support Systems

Decision Support Systems

Sistem Penunjang Keputusan

Page 2: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Whom do we intend to support?• In what capacity?• In what context?

Page 3: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making

Managerial Activity (Chapter 1)• Objectives -- After studying this chapter, you

should be able to– Effectively converse with managers about what they

do and understand what you would do as a manager.– Describe the general nature of organizations that

you may someday manage.– Cite the four major resources of organizations and

explain what managers do with them.

Page 4: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making

– Identify the various functions or roles that describe the work a manager performs.

– Explain relationships that exist among management, knowledge, decision making, and technology.

• Relevance– DSS as element of managerial activity– Managerial activity as guiding metaphor for DSS

designs

Page 5: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• What does a manager do?

– To have impact on managerial practice, we must answer various questions (Mintzberg 1980)

• What kinds of activities does manager perform?• What kinds of information does manager process?• What are distinguishing characteristics of managerial

work?• What is of interest about media used, activities preferred,

flow of activities, use of time, pressures of job, etc.?

Page 6: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• What basic roles can be inferred from study of activities?• What variations exist among managerial jobs and why?• To what extent is management a science and a manager’s

work repetitive, systematic, predictable?

– More fundamentally, what is it that is managed?• An Organization

– small ----- large– private ----- public ----- governmental– informal ----- formal– temporary ----- permanent

Page 7: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• But what exactly is an organization?

– A system (1)– of resources (2)– structured by (3)– power centers to (4)– achieve some purpose (5)– within some environment (6)

Page 8: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• System

– open system (J. Miller 1972)• affects and is affected by surroundings

– accepts inputs and produces outputs• Resources

– three categories (Miner 1978)• monetary, material, human

– inputs as resources

Page 9: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– difficulties with this view?

• I/0 relationships are 1:1• Missing resource

– fourth type of resource• existing within an organization (asset)• can be input to organization• also output by organization• Knowledge

Page 10: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Structure

– at any moment, resources are configured in some nonrandom manner: current state

– some structural aspects are relatively static, while others are very dynamic

– roles are an important structuring mechanism (Biddle and Thomas 1966)

• division of labor• labor-capital substitution

Page 11: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Power Centers

– wielders of authority (i.e., managers)– a major task of management (Miner 1978)

• “attract, select, and allocate resources” (i.e., structure resources)

– differentiate based on scope of authority– different organization designs result from alternative

distributions of power

Page 12: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Purpose

– managers work to bring system to state consistent with purpose/goals

– possibility of dysfunction• Environment

– changing state of environment --- change in org. state to maintain consistency with purpose/goals

– organization can affect environment

Page 13: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– Managerial functions (Fayol 1916)

• Planning: establish forecasts; formulate outline of things to be done and methods for execution with respect to organization purpose

• Organizing: configuring the organization’s resources (esp. human: selection, role assignment, education, evaluation of managers)

• Command: issuing instructions of specific and general natures to cause activities to happen (i.e., sending directive messages to humans)

• Coordination: interrelating/harmonizing activities in the organization

• Control: verifying proper implementation of plans

Page 14: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Extensions (Urwick 1943)

– Forecasting: separate from planning– Investigation: synonymous with research (resulting

in acquisition of knowledge)– Communicating (e.g., reporting)

• Alternative conception (Barnard 1968)– Providing a system of communication by establishing

and staffing managerial roles– Securing efforts by eliciting desired role behavior– Formulating purpose by specifying what work to do

Page 15: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– Notes:

• Functional approach to characterizing what a manager does

– based on interpretation of personal experience– suggests “management support systems”– criticized (e.g., by Mintzberg (1980) as labeling our

areas of ignorance, describing vague objectives, indicating what we need to explain

– no mention of decision making or knowledge

Page 16: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– Managerial roles (Mintzberg 1980)

• Derived from empirical studies of managerial work• Ten interrelated roles performed by all managers fall into

three categories Interpersonal roles derive from authority, status

1. Figurehead - obliged to perform routine duties of social, ceremonial, or legal nature

2. Leader - motivates/activates subordinates, including staffing, training, promoting, probing

3. Liaison - maintains network of contacts in environment for trading information and services

Page 17: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making Informational roles derive from access to information that

interpersonal roles provide4. Monitor - seeks and acquires information to have

understanding of organization and its environment5. Disseminator - transmits information (from

subordinates, outsiders, self) to others in organization6. Spokesman - transmits information to outsiders (PR)

Decisional roles derive from authority and information7. Entrepreneur - searches organization and environment

for opportunities and initiates/devises controlled change in organization

8. Disturbance Handler - initiates/devises corrective action when org. faces unexpected disturbance

Page 18: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making9. Resource Allocator - allocates resources, in effect

determining where organization will expend its efforts (i.e., determining org. strategy)

10. Negotiator - represents organization in negotiations with others

Note: Emphasis on communicating, information, decision making

Page 19: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• A working perspective

– A manager is an entity having the power to structure some monetary, material, human, and knowledge resources existing in an organization, with the intent of pursuing some purpose of the organization with respect to its environment

– An organization’s managers transform its resources from one state to another, in the interest of conforming to its purpose within a changing environment

Page 20: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– An organization’s managers can acquire resources from

the environment and release resources to the environment

– All activities of a manager involve• decision making • communication • A manager can make decisions about plans, organization,

commands, coordination, control. Similarly, a manager can communicate with respect to each of these.

– Both decision making and communication are based on the ability to handle knowledge

(acquiring, storing, recalling, using, deriving, distributing)

Page 21: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– In communicating, the manager transmits/receives

knowledge. The communication process is concerned with message passing and implies the existence of some language

– In making a decision, the manager manufactures knowledge: a description of what to do with resources, a description of a future state. The manufacturing process draws on knowledge: descriptions of what is, what is desired, what is expected

Page 22: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– How can computers support a manager’s decision

making?• implies communication• orientation toward particular kinds of decisions?• different types of support for different decisions, decision

makers, decision contexts• need for general understanding of decision making

Page 23: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making Decisions (Chapter 2)

• Objectives -- After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

– Explain what a decision is and what it means to make a decision.

– Distinguish among various decision contexts that you might encounter as a manager.

– Recognize the different types of decisions that managers make.

– Classify a given decision as either structured, semi-structured, or unstructured.

Page 24: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– Converse about decision support needs and

characteristics for various decision contexts and decision types that managers face.

• What is a decision?– A choice

• about: “course of action” (Simon 1960; Costello & Zalkind 1963; Fishburn 1964; Churchman 1968) “strategy of action” (Fishburn 1964) leading “to a certain desired objective” (Churchman 1968)

Page 25: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– A piece of knowledge indicating the nature of an

action commitment• Decision may be descriptive knowledge

“Spend $10,000 on advertising in 3rd quarter”• Decision may be a piece of procedural knowledge

“First do A, then do B twice, and if the response is satisfactory, then proceed with C”

• Decision making: activity of manufacturing a new piece of knowledge expressing commitment to some course of action

– A knowledge-intensive activity– Alters the state of knowledge

Page 26: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Contexts in which decisions are manufactured

influence nature of decision making– Management level

Anthony taxonomy (Anthony 1965)• A decision is made in the context of

– Strategic planning about overall objectives and policies

– Management control to assure resources acquired/used in effective/efficient way

– Operational control to assure that specific tasks are carried out effectively/efficiently by operating personnel

Page 27: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Forms a continuum

– Top ----- Middle ----- Lower Management– Organization ----- Department ----- Line

• Support needs can differ depending on the level

– Maturity• A decision is made in the context of

– Established situation, suggesting considerable knowledge about (e.g., experience with) the current state of the world and the history of past encounters

– Emergent situation, suggesting knowledge scarcity• Continuum

Page 28: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– Concurrency

• Multiple decisions simultaneously in process– for an individual– for an organization

• Coordination of dependencies• Scheduling concurrent manufacturing processes

– Organization design• Centralization vs decentralization• Generalists (many roles) vs specialists ( few roles)• Hierarchic vs flat authority structures

Page 29: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Types of Decisions

– Influence nature of decision making– Classify in terms of:– Management level

• strategic planning vs management control vs operational control

– Management function (POCCC)– Functional areas

Page 30: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– Structuredness (Simon 1960)

• Refers to how routine, repetitive the mfg. process isStructured UnstructuredEstablished Situation Emergent SituationProgrammable Decision Creative DecisionSituation Fully Understood Situation UnclearRoutine One-shotSpecialized Mfg. Processes General Processes

– Negotiation• Unilateral decisions• Negotiated decisions

Page 31: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making Decision Maker (Chapter 3)

• Objectives -- After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

– Compare and contrast four major kinds of decision makers that you are likely to encounter in an organization.

– Describe the phases you would go through in a decision-making process.

– Explain the relationship between problem solving and decision making.

Page 32: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making

– Identify common strategies that are used in guiding decision-making processing.

– Describe limitations that managers encounter in making decisions.

– Discuss decision support needs and characteristics for various kinds of decision makers and decision-making strategies.

• What is the nature of the entity that manufactures a decision?

Page 33: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making

• This influences the manufacturing process• Individual

– Person• May vary in terms of training, experience, cognitive

styles, intelligence, knowledge (Miner 1978)• Common traits

– Can accept messages stated in some language– Possesses a reservoir of knowledge

Page 34: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– Computer

• Factory automation• Robotics• Structured, Programmable Decisions in established,

operational control contexts

– Distributed, Multiperson• Decision made by group/committee

– No formal structure of authority– Effects (Miner 1978; Steiner and Miner 1977) - inhibitory effect on production of ideas in face-to-face meetings

Page 35: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making - brings new knowledge, viewpoints to bear - often takes longer

- risky shift (tend to take greater risks) - group think (tend over time to develop strong norms that may prevent paying adequate attention to realities - blind spots)– Brainstorming (Summers & White 1976) - members produce ideas, circulate them, without criticism vs usual mix of production and critics

Page 36: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making - perception that expert present has inhibitory effect, esp. if all are conceived as experts (Collaros and Anderson 1969)– may be better for some types of decisions than for

others • Decision shared with subordinates (Heller 1976)

– participants differ in terms of authority, specialties– facilitated by following conditions - high quality decision needed - manager lacks needed knowledge - decision is unstructured

Page 37: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making - implementation of decision may require subordinate acceptance - there is some question about securing that acceptance - subordinate commitment to organization’s goals - minimal conflict among subordinates– pattern/mechanism of this distribution decision

making depends on organization design - hierarchic - market

Page 38: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making Decision Process (Chapter 3)

- to understand decision support possibilities, we need a conception of the process that results in a decision- we then ask what aspects of decision making are amendable to computer-based support

Page 39: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Phases (Simon 1960)

– Intelligence• collecting, organizing knowledge• alertness to occasions for decision

– Design• identification, examination of possible courses of action• evaluation of expected outcomes for these

– Choice• applies authority to make selection, in face of

internal/external pressures

Page 40: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– May not occur in strict, uninterrupted sequence

• concurrency of phases• loops• each phase may initiate subactivities

Page 41: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Problem solving

– Activity directed toward satisfying some sensed need (Costello & Zalkind 1963)

– “emphasizes thought process that precedes terminal choice” (Ebert & Mitchell 1975)

– Making a decision involves the solving of problems• what problems?• in what sequence?For structured decisions, answers well-knownFor unstructured decisions, they are not -- require exploration, ingenuity, dead ends

Page 42: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Decision-Making Strategy

decision-making process colored by strategy used to choose

– Optimizing: select course of action with highest payoff/utility

• must estimate costs/benefits of every viable alternative• very costly in time, effort, money to collect/examine

volumes of knowledge• no way to adequately combine all factors into a utility

measure (Miller and Starr 1969)• more prescriptive than descriptive

Page 43: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– Satisficing: select course of action “good enough”

to meet minimal set of requirements (Simon 1976)• all alternatives are not considered• consistent with limited ability to foresee consequences

and limited time, effort, money to make decision• alternatives considered sequentially• differences from optimizing (can be hybrids)

– S: small set of requirements, all of which met O: possibly large set of requirements, “best” set chosen

Page 44: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– S: sequentially test each alternative as generated O: consider as many “good” alternatives as possible– S: test alternative in a haphazard order O: repeatedly reexamine “best” alternatives– S: test is not a cut off point and equal importance O: additive, assessment of utility

– Elimination-by-aspects (Tversky 1972)• narrowing process, eliminating alternatives that fail with

respect to 1 aspect, then another, etc.• if run out of aspects, introduce another

Page 45: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• could run out of alternatives, or eliminate one that is

“overall” superior to others in all but a single aspect• variants - ascribe weights to aspects

– Incrementalism (Lindblom 1959, 1965)• “muddling through” or “putting out fires”• successive comparisons of alternatives to current course, to

find ways of removing shortcomings of present approach

– Mixed scanning (Etzioni 1967)• scanning: search, collection, processing, evaluating,

weighing of information• importance of decision determines degree of scanning and

choice approach

Page 46: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• for major decisions

– list alternatives– briefly consider all, rejecting those with “crippling

objection”– iterate with the remainder in greater detail until one

alternative remains• for minor ensuing decisions

– incremental satisficing

Page 47: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• Knowledge Management Perspective

May be structured --- unstructuredMay involve intelligence, design, choiceMay entail problem reductionMay employ any of several decision strategiesBut in all cases, knowledge is raw material, work in

process, finished good of decision making.

Page 48: Decision Support Systems

Decision MakingAs raw material, knowledge is either possessed bydecision maker or invoked by decision makerProblems faced in making a decision involve theprocessing knowledge

• Need for Decision Support– Cognitive limits

• human capacity for processing contents of immediate memory limited to about 7 variables

Page 49: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making• long term memory capacity apparently small relative to

growing volumes of relevant knowledge• problems of forgetting, erroneous recall• information inundation can be as debilitating as

information scarcity– stress– error– ignoring too much

• problems of erroneous, infeasible processing

Page 50: Decision Support Systems

Decision Support– Economic limits

• humans are expensive• increasing their number of compensate for cognitive

limits, can become economically prohibitive

– Temporal limits• decision may be required in a time frame that puts severe

pressure on a decision maker• given limits in human processing speed, the decision

maker may be forced to use unwanted strategy

Page 51: Decision Support Systems

Decision Support– Competitive strategy implications

• Nature of support– Systems that solve problems involved in decision

making– Systems that facilitate/extend knowledge management

capabilities– Systems that coordinate distributed decision making– Systems that offer advice, expectations, facts, analyses,

etc.– Above are interactive in nature

Page 52: Decision Support Systems

Decision Making– May range from supporting structured to

unstructured decision processes– May play a stimulative role

• Source of support– Human– Computer (metaphor)