decision making styles

5
Double Loop Development Decision-making styles Followers (36%) Risk-averse Worried about making the wrong choice Make decisions on the basis of how they made similar decisions in the past or on how others they trust have made decisions. Generally cautious More aware of cost-effectiveness than some others. Focus on proven methods. Unlikely to decide in favour of something entirely untried but like idea of innovation. May repeatedly challenge your position Only agree to something if seen it elsewhere first. How to influence Demonstrate where others have succeeded with similar decisions. Provide the evidence. Avoid selling yourself unless you have a proven track record Look for previous decision the person has taken (or people they trust) which support what you want and refer to those. Focus on cases studies, Use references & testimonials Present more evidence in support of your favoured option than alternatives Responds best to: Reason Coalition Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HT e-mail: [email protected] Tel: 0131 208 2701

Upload: thistleblake

Post on 24-May-2015

579 views

Category:

Business


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Handout from Influencing Skills Workshop - Hillary Robertson

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Decision Making Styles

Double Loop Development

Decision-making styles

Followers (36%) Risk-averse Worried about making the wrong choice Make decisions on the basis of how they made similar decisions in

the past or on how others they trust have made decisions. Generally cautious More aware of cost-effectiveness than some others. Focus on proven methods. Unlikely to decide in favour of something entirely untried but like

idea of innovation. May repeatedly challenge your position Only agree to something if seen it elsewhere first.

How to influence Demonstrate where others have succeeded with similar decisions. Provide the evidence. Avoid selling yourself unless you have a proven track record Look for previous decision the person has taken (or people they

trust) which support what you want and refer to those. Focus on cases studies, Use references & testimonials Present more evidence in support of your favoured option than

alternatives

Responds best to: Reason Coalition

Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HTe-mail: [email protected]

Tel: 0131 208 2701

Page 2: Decision Making Styles

Double Loop Development

Charismatics (25%)

Like new ideas Enthusiastic & captivating Talkative Dominant Short attention span Methodical decision-makers Can process large amounts of information quickly Influenced by visual interpretations Can get really enthusiastic about a new idea Will not make a decision unless facts support Make decisions on the basis of balanced information Take responsibility for decisions

How to influence Focus on results Demonstrate evidence Impress with your intelligence Keep arguments simple and straightforward Use visual aids Be up-front about possible problems/risks

Responds best to: Reason – but be sure to start with most critical info Coalition or higher authority – influenced by other senior

people/people they respect

Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HTe-mail: [email protected]

Tel: 0131 208 2701

Page 3: Decision Making Styles

Double Loop Development

Sceptics (19%) Very strong personality Suspicious of new data Especially suspicious of anything that challenges their view Trust people like themselves Can seem aggressive and combative Usually take charge Can be rebellious Demanding of both time & energy Regularly disagree with espoused views or the status quo Quite self-absorbed and act primarily on feelings Almost always tell you what they think

How to influence Credibility is vital. If you don’t have enough find some Enlist support of someone sceptic trusts

Responds best to: Friendliness – building up a relationship so that they trust your

judgement Coalition or higher authority – gaining an endorsement or enlisting

help/support from someone the sceptic trusts

Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HTe-mail: [email protected]

Tel: 0131 208 2701

Page 4: Decision Making Styles

Double Loop Development

Thinkers (11%) Can be the hardest group to influence. Strongly risk-averse Slow to reach a decision Set considerable store by arguments backed up by firm data Like quantitative & comparative data Usually academic, intelligent, cerebral Logical Guard emotions Voracious readers Choose words carefully Always try to anticipate change Play to win

How to influence Have as much information ready as possible eg Cost-benefits Surveys Option appraisals Explain position from all perspectives Address counter arguments Explain carefully how you arrive at your conclusions Be open about any concerns/risks Appeal to thinker’s intelligence

Responds best to Reason

Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HTe-mail: [email protected]

Tel: 0131 208 2701

Page 5: Decision Making Styles

Double Loop Development

Controllers (9%) Usually strong personalities Sometimes overbearing Seen as logical, unemotional Dislike ambiguity and uncertainty Driven by own fears and insecurities Only see things from own perspective Given to snap judgements May discuss decision with others but rarely listens Focused on facts and analyse arguments carefully Pay attention to the fine detail as a way of covering up their fears Open to fact or evidence-based reasoning. Controlling is more important that innovating Try to avoid being held accountable

How to influence Argument must be structured & linear Credibility is vital An expert should present info Avoid pushing your point of view too hard Provide all the information required and let the controller come to

their own decision Be prepared to wait

Responds to Reason Friendliness

Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HTe-mail: [email protected]

Tel: 0131 208 2701