decision making: fundamentals and systems michael a. mazzocco aapex february, 2011

29
Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A. Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011 Mazzocco - DRAFT

Upload: hea

Post on 13-Feb-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A. Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011. Overview. Two - 1:15 minute sessions Part 1. Analyzing and Making Decisions – Some Fundamentals Part Deux . Organizing for Effective Decisions. My Observations. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Mazzocco - DRAFT

Decision Making:Fundamentals and Systems

Michael A. Mazzocco

AAPEXFebruary, 2011

Page 2: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Overview

• Two - 1:15 minute sessions

• Part 1. Analyzing and Making Decisions – Some Fundamentals

• Part Deux. Organizing for Effective Decisions

Page 3: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

My Observations

Seeds of motivation

Can’t possibly cover all aspects in part of an afternoon

What drove me to call Danny about decisions

Page 4: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

My Observations

1. Decisions often made prior to analysis[ fire, aim, ready ? ]

Very popular in simplistic LEEDERship culture.

“vision” “purpose”

What drove me to call Danny about decisions

Page 5: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

My Observations

1. Decisions often made prior to analysis– Analyze this so I don’t look stupid … – This is what I want to do,

• What are the holes in my argument and how do I fix them?

– This is what I want to do,• How bad can certain parts get (price, yield, expenses)

AND I‘m still OK?

What drove me to call Danny about decisions

Page 6: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

My Observations

2. Analysis of decisions frequently uses wrong information– Incorporating extraneous considerations– Overlooking critical factors

3. Decision criteria not specified

4. Inaccurate data– That California plant – cost per lb. – Complete cost?– Raw or finished?

What drove me to call Danny about decisions

Page 7: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Make A Decision Description

• What is the purpose of the analysis ?• What is the desired outcome of the

analysis ?– Comfort?

– Value? Magnitude?

– Support?

– Understanding?

– A choice among alternatives?

What are you trying to decide?

Page 8: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Make A Decision Description

• What are you trying to accomplish?– Change? Size? Revenue Throughput

Costs (Inventory? Operating Expenses?)

– Sustained Operations?• Employee retention? • peas:carrots land allocation?

– Asset Service?• Rent, lease; size; new, used?

– Risk reduction?

– Say it out loud …

What are you trying to decide?

Page 9: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Decision Focus and Criteria

• Strategic Direction?• Dispense and move on?

• Color of carpet in the board room … ?

• Short to Mid range operating profit plan?– Inputs/production methods

• (twin row? Early wean?)– Output choice

• (corn:beans:cotton)– Input/output

• (fertilize the pastures?)

What are you trying to decide?

Page 10: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Criteria dictates appropriate tool• When in doubt, look it up or ask !

• Example: Partial budget

– “Make A Business Case for your idea.”

– Include only CHANGES– items that will change by implementing change

Page 11: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Partial Budget LayoutAnnual Revenues and Expenses

Positive Impacts Negative Impacts

Increased Revenues Decreased Revenues

-- $$ -- $$

-- $$ -- $$

Decreased Costs Increased Costs

-- $$ -- $$

-- $$ -- $$

Total Positive Impacts Total Negative Impacts

Net Impact

Could be lots of detail and many rows

Page 12: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Cognitive Interference

• Escalating Commitment• (M&A examples)

• Measuring Others’ Pain• (M&A examples)

• Cognitive Bias and Framing• In-session example

Many Categories. Here are a few.

Page 13: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Decision Making Incorporating Risk

• How many cattle to feed? Weather affects cost and availability of feed.

Make a payoff matrix

Feed Production Probability  Low Fair Good High Expected  0.10 0.25 0.35 0.30 ValueAlternative Outcome  

8,000 $150,000 $170,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,500 10,000 $0 $120,000 $220,000 $270,000 $188,000 12,000 ($100,000) $0 $250,000 $350,000 $182,500

• TWELVE budgets [forecasts] [scenarios] [ ]• Four possible [weather] outcomes• WHICH ROW OF OUTCOMES WILL YOU SELECT ? What is decision criteria ?

Page 14: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Decision Making Incorporating risk

• How many cattle to feed? Weather affects cost and availability of feed.

Make a payoff matrix

• WHICH ROW OF OUTCOMES WILL YOU SELECT ? What is decision criteria ?• Highest Expected Value? • What is expected value of a coin flip?• How many “pulls of the lever” do you get?

Feed Production Probability  Low Fair Good High Expected  0.10 0.25 0.35 0.30 ValueAlternative Outcome  

8,000 $150,000 $170,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,500 10,000 $0 $120,000 $220,000 $270,000 $188,000 12,000 ($100,000) $0 $250,000 $350,000 $182,500

Page 15: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Decision Making Incorporating risk

• How many cattle to feed? Weather affects cost and availability of feed.

Make a payoff matrix

• WHICH ROW OF OUTCOMES WILL YOU SELECT ? What is decision criteria ?

• Can you afford no income? Negative income?

Feed Production Probability  Low Fair Good High Expected  0.10 0.25 0.35 0.30 ValueAlternative Outcome  

8,000 $150,000 $170,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,500 10,000 $0 $120,000 $220,000 $270,000 $188,000 12,000 ($100,000) $0 $250,000 $350,000 $182,500

Page 16: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Decision Making Incorporating risk

• How many cattle to feed? Weather affects cost and availability of feed.

Make a payoff matrix

• WHICH ROW OF OUTCOMES WILL YOU SELECT ? What is decision criteria ?

• Can you afford to chance high income?

Feed Production Probability  Low Fair Good High Expected  0.10 0.25 0.35 0.30 ValueAlternative Outcome  

8,000 $150,000 $170,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,500 10,000 $0 $120,000 $220,000 $270,000 $188,000 12,000 ($100,000) $0 $250,000 $350,000 $182,500

Page 17: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Decision Making Incorporating risk

• How many cattle to feed? Weather affects cost and availability of feed.

Make a payoff matrix

• WHICH ROW OF OUTCOMES WILL YOU SELECT ? What is decision criteria ?

• Or do you need a minimum income level?

Feed Production Probability  Low Fair Good High Expected  0.10 0.25 0.35 0.30 ValueAlternative Outcome  

8,000 $150,000 $170,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,500 10,000 $0 $120,000 $220,000 $270,000 $188,000 12,000 ($100,000) $0 $250,000 $350,000 $182,500

Page 18: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Decision Making Incorporating risk

• How many cattle to feed? Weather affects cost and availability of feed.

Make a payoff matrix

Feed Production Probability  Low Fair Good High Expected  0.10 0.25 0.35 0.30 ValueAlternative Outcome  

8,000 $150,000 $170,000 $180,000 $200,000 $180,500 10,000 $0 $120,000 $220,000 $270,000 $188,000 12,000 ($100,000) $0 $250,000 $350,000 $182,500

• All three choices are correct, depending upon your decision criteria !

Page 19: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Part II. Effective Decision Organizations

Experience of many pathologies• “Don’t do anything until I tell you what to do next.”• Bottleneck of all decisions going through one point.• Failure to have a timeline

– “Let’s schedule a follow up.”• Criteria uncertain• Critical decisions at wrong place• Bad execution

Improve Performance (Bain)

Page 20: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Symptoms of Bad Decision Structure

• Take too long• Made by wrong people, wrong part of

organization with wrong information• Turn out badly / Not made well.• Re-debated, Re-examined.• Bad execution• Pain of inconsistency

Improve Performance (Bain)

Page 21: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Decision Effectiveness

1. Quality – Right decisions. Right approach.2. Speed – Relative, not absolute.3. Yield – Turning decisions into action.

4. Effort – The appropriate amount.– Drag on 3 above if too much or too little.

Measures of organizational decision making (Bain)

Page 22: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Decision Effectiveness

1. What? – decisions need to be made and executed?2. Who? – will play key roles?

• Maker• Recommender• Information gatherer

3. How? – will the decision be made and executed?• Criteria• Analytical technique

4. When? – will the decision be made and executed?• Timeline

Structuring decisions for impact (Bain)

Page 23: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

What?

1. Critical decisions• Large value at stake• Made / re-made frequently,

adding up to large value

2. Clarity• Frame• Unbundling

Structuring decisions for impact (Bain)

Page 24: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Who?

1. RAPID • Recommend – the analyst• Agree – Who is “signing off” on recommendation?

» Agreeers are not necessarily the decision maker.

• Perform – Who will implement and execute?• Input – Judgment and information providers• Decide – One person

2. Actually, order is: R – I – A – D - P

Structuring decisions for impact (Bain)

Page 25: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

How?

Structured Decision Approach• Agreement on criteria and technique

– Impacts Effort, Quality, and Speed• All the relevant facts• More than one REAL alternative

– Kissinger example: Three concocted alternatives.1. Outcome is Surrender to Soviets2. Outcome is Thermonuclear War3. Outcome is … What the team wanted to do all along

• Establish steps and sequence• Decision is NOT the same as discussion of choices

Structuring decisions for impact (Bain)

Page 26: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

When?

Be Explicit

• Clear, specific timetable• Impacts yield, speed

Structuring decisions for impact (Bain)

Page 27: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Organizational Plumbing and Wiring

• Common vocabulary– What is “margin?”

• Location of decisions:– Not all the same– Wayne Beck: “empowered.”

• Understanding roles;• Using appropriate resources• Capturing input and analyses

Structuring decisions for impact (Bain)

Page 28: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

What Else?

Questions? Comments?

Page 29: Decision Making: Fundamentals and Systems Michael A.  Mazzocco AAPEX February, 2011

Contact Information

Mike [email protected] http://www.verdantpartners.com/consult.phpPhone: +1 (217) 359-8470 x8817Fax: +1 (217) 359-8870 2504 Galen Drive, Suite 103Champaign, IL 61821-7048 USA

References