AMCS IN 3D ACCEPTANCE IN MANAGING LOSS AND

ANGER

POWER IS NOT TRANSACTIONAL: HOWEVER IT IS ABOUT BEING TRANSACTIONAL: ACCEPTANCE

WHICH ALLOWS THE OTHER TO BE; THEIR CHOICE WHICH IS YOUR POWER...

FOUNDATION PIECES IN SGP ETHOS:

A REVIEW 1/3

TO JUST EXIST IS BE NOTHING: MEANINGLESS.

HOWEVER, THERE MUST BE EXISTENCE BEFORE ESSENCE.

THE SUBJECTIVE INDIVIDUAL IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PIECE:

WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE HEGEL VS KIERKEGAARD CONFLICT WITH REGARDS TO THIS ATOMISTIC DILEMMA AS TO WHAT IS BASIC: THE STATE VS THE INDIVIDUAL: HEGEL’S HISTORICISM MAKES THIS CONFLICT MOOT. NOTE THE IMPORTANCE OF HISTORICAL FIGURES.

FOUNDATIONAL TO SGP

REVIEW 2/3

• EXISTANCE, BEING AND BECOMING:

• AVOIDING NOTHINGNESS: MEANINGLESSNESS OF SEPARATION:

• INTIMACY IN 5 ACTS IS THE ACTION PLAN TO CREATE INTIMATE SPACES TO OVERCOME LOSS AND SEPARATION.

• CONSCIOUS DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION IS ONTOLOGICAL.

• FROM MASTERY TO RATIONAL CHOICE, IT IS ALWAYS ABOUT CHOICE AND FREEDOM.

• CHOICE INFORMS ACTION, EVEN BAD CHOICES: IN ACTING WE BECOME: BEING AND BECOMING. HAVE MEANING. OVERCOME SEPARATION: RECOVERING INTIMACY FIRST AND THEN LOVE.

FOUNDATIONAL TO SGP

REVIEW 3/3

• THE HOUSE: IN THE LORD’S PRAYER

• THE HOUSE IS TRANSCENDANT AND UBIQUITOUS IN HUMAN HISTORY.

• RECOVERY FROM LOSS REQUIRES ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE TO BUILD THE HOUSE AND HAVING THE MORAL FORCE AND POWER TO CREATE THE AESTHETIC, MORAL AND ETHICAL SPACES IN THAT HOUSE, NOW A HOME TO RECOVER FROM LOSS: WE MUST BUILD A HOUSE AND THEN FIND THE COURAGE TO LIVE IN IT.

• LIVE IN THE HOUSE REQUIRES MANAGING CONFLICT: MANAGING THE FIRE IMPLICIT IN ALL RELATIONSHIPS: HEAT AND DESTRUCTIVENESS OF FIRE VS THE ILLUMINATING LIGHT OF FIRE.

• DISCURSIVE NOMINALIZATION: INTIMACY IN GETTING TO KNOW THE HOUSE AND NAMING AND LABELING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE HOUSE, NOW BECOMING A HOME. BARGAINING: ACCEPTANCE: PRACTICING: THEN RECOVERY.

The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.

He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me

beside the still waters.

He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of

righteousness for his name's sake.

Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I

will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they

comfort me.

Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine

enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.

Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my

life: and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever.

THE HOUSE, IN THE ETHOS OF THE SGP PROJECT, IS

AN IMPORTANT METAPHOR.

— Psalm 23:1-6

BARGAINING VS

ACCEPTANCE

BOTH CAN INFORM CHOICE PRIOR TO ACTION:

BARGAINING IS NECESSARY

• WE INCREASE KNOWLEDGE: (EMPATHY GENE)

• WE INCREASE OUR EXPERIENCES: DISCURSIVE

NOMINALIZATION GIVES US A CHANCE TO EXPLORE THE

HOME UNDER CONSTRUCTION: ABLE TO RECOGNIZE HARM

AND TO FEEL OR EXPERIENCE DISGUST, ALL INFORMING

CHOICE.

• WE INCREASE OUR UNDERSTANDING: (OF WHAT TO AVOID)

BARGAINING HAS DOWN SIDES

1. PARALYSIS OF ANALYSIS: LIMITS BEING AND BECOMING:

2. CONSTANTLY SEEKING TRUTH BY ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE UTILIZING ETIC SPEECH OF DISCURSIVE NOMINALIZAATION: ETIC SPEECH, UNLESS IT EVOLVES TO EIDOSTIC THEN EIDETIC SPEECH IS LIMITING AND MUST PROGRESS TO INVOLVE CULTURAL CONTEXTUALIZATION OF SPEECH AND THEN VISUALIZATION OF OUR EXPERIENCES TO FACILITATING EDITING AND MAKING SPEECH CONSTITUTIVE: THUS AVOIDING FAUX INTIMACY, TRUTHERISM, AND CONFIRMATIONAL BIAS, ALL WORKING AGAINST RECOVERY.

ACCEPTANCE

• STOICISM: START OF TRUE POWER. NOT ACTING ON (BY ACTING OUT ON) WITH THE REDUCED RELIANCE OR NEED FOR THE INTIMACY AS PROVIDED FOR, BY THE MASTER-SLAVE RELATIONSHIP.

• SKEPTICISM: FEELING YOUR OATS BUT ACCEPTING THE CONTOURS OF A RELATIONSHIP YOU DO NOT NEED AS MUCH, DUE TO YOUR INTERNAL GROWTH. NOW CREATING AND RELYING ON INTIMATE SPACES YOU NOW CAN PROVIDE FOR YOURSELF.

• ASKESIS OR SELFLESSNESS: IN THE UNHAPPY CONSCIOUSNESS: POWER OF ALLOWING THE OTHER TO BE. FACILITATING THEIR BEING. THERE CHOICE. REMOVING YOURSELF FROM THE EQUATION.

COSMOPOLITANISM

• ACCEPTANCE OF THE OTHER: INTIMACY IN 5 ACTS:

• RECOGNIZING THE SAMENESS IN DIVERSITY: ONENESS.

• XENIA: PHILLIA: AGAPE:

• POWER EVOLVES WHEREBY YOU ACCEPT THE OTHR AND THEIR BEING AND HAVING PURPOSE: ACCEPTING THEIR CHOICE IN BEING WHICH NOW ENHANCES YOUR POWER.

• COMPLICATIONS NEEDING TO BE MANAGED: 1. OBJECT USE AND 2. CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: METAPHOR: MANAGING THE FIRE.

MORAL DEVELOPMENT

• MORAL FORCE TO MORAL POWER: MANAGING THE FIRE IS IMPLICIT IN ALL RELATIONSHIPS. MORALITY INVOLVES AND REQUIRES RULES AND EXPECTATIONS WHICH GUIDES AND INFORMS CHOICE BEFORE ACTION.

• REQUIRES AND NEEDS THE CONSOLIDATION OF AESTHETIC INTIMACY LEADING TO PRIMARY NARCISSISM:

• INTIMACY IS ABOUT VALUE AND EMPATHY:

• YOUR SENSE OF VALUE, INFORMS YOUR CHOICE IN ACTING OR NOT:

• MANAGING OBJECT USE AND THE CREATIVE DESTRUCTION OF BEING AND BECOMING REQUIRES THE ELABORATION OF RULES AND EXPECTATIONS OF CONDUCT AND ACTION THEREBY REDUCING CONFLICT:

SUMMARY OF WORD CLOUD

1. MORAL FORCE TO MORAL POWER: RATIONAL CHOICE

2. AESTHETIC INTIMACY: PRIMARY NARCISSISM:

3. BARGAINING VS ACCEPTANCE: FORCE VS POWER

4. POWER UNTO DEATH AND PROSECUTORIAL ANXIETY

5. RELATIONSHIPS: DEPRSSIVE ANXIETY: INTIMACY

6. STOICISM: START OF REAL POWER: CHOICE: ACTION