debbie hart institute of social and economic research university of essex
DESCRIPTION
Happy Families? The association between parental life satisfaction and older children’s self-esteem. Debbie Hart Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Essex. Questions guiding research. What factors are associated with youth self –esteem? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Happy Families? The association between
parental life satisfaction and older children’s self-esteem
Debbie HartInstitute of Social and Economic
ResearchUniversity of Essex
Questions guiding research
• What factors are associated with youth self –esteem?
• Does the wellbeing of parents have an effect on youth self-esteem?
• Do relationships differ according to mother/father, sons/daughters?
• Does a relationship remain when a variety of other youth characteristics are taken into account?
Relevant literature• ‘Emotional contagion’ – transference of emotion
between individuals
• Evidence of emotional contagion between: - college roommates (Anderson,2003)- work colleagues (Totterdell et al, 1998)- married couples (Saxbe and Repetti, 2010)
- Short time period- Small samples- Diary methods
• Hannington et al (2010) found that parental depressive symptoms were associated with increased temperament problems in infants at follow up.
• Maternal depression has also been associated with insecure attachment (Downey and Coyne 1990, Martins and Gaffman 2000)
• Focus on more clinical problems• Focus predominantly on infants
Contagion hypothesis
Low parental life satisfaction
Observant learning Changes to parent-child relationship
More family conflict
Risks to self-esteem of child
Common stressor hypothesis
Common family stressor
Low parental satisfaction Low youth self esteem
• Can control for some family stressors• Would still suggest child’s vulnerability to family stress• Parent’s coping mechanisms may still impact upon
child
Reverse causation hypothesis
Low youth self esteem
Low parental life satisfaction
• Can introduce a lagged version of parental life satisfaction
• Control for lagged youth self esteem
Data and Measures• British Household Panel Survey, waves 4-17• Youth questionnaire, 11-15 year olds• Youth’s data matched with their parent’s data on
adult questionnaire
• Parental life satisfaction measure:• “How dissatisfied or satisfied are you with your life
overall?”• 1-7 scale, converted to dummy, low/high life
satisfaction
• Youth self-esteem measure:
• “Please say whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree that the following statements apply to yourself.– I feel I have a number of good qualities– I certainly feel useless at times– I am a likeable person– I am inclined to feel I am a failure– At times I feel I am no good at all
• 1-16 scale
OLS Regression – basic model
Mum low life satisfaction t-1 -0.720 ***
Dad low life satisfaction t-1 -0.398 **
N 3861
R squared 0.01
OLS Regression – with parental controls
Mum low satisfaction t-1 -0.705 * **
Dad low satisfaction t-1 -0.296Mum poorer health status -0.101 **
Dad poorer health status -0.328
Mum employed 0.401 **
Dad employed 0.033
Mum has degree 0.085
Dad has degree 0.079
N 2716
R squared 0.02
OLS Regression – full modelMum low satisfaction t-1 -0.460 ** Dad low satisfaction t-1 -0.098Mum poorer health status -0.116
Dad poorer health status -0.147
Mum employed 0.213 **
Dad employed 0.218
Mum has degree 0.113
Dad has degree 0.076
Youth self esteem t-1 0.431 ***
Age -0.040
Number of siblings 0.011
Female youth -0.634 ***Youth’s number of friends 0.026 **
Youth worries about bullying -0.409***
Youth happy at school 0.306 ***
Talks to mum about important things 0.262 **Talks to Dad about important things 0.070 **N 2462
R squared 0.36
Male youths Female youthsMum low satisfaction t-1 -0.548 ** -0.393**Dad low satisfaction t-1 -0.029 -0.155Mum poorer health status -0.034 0.222
Dad poorer health status -0.017 0.259
Mum employed 0.265 * 0.269
Dad employed 0.107 0.268
Mum has degree 0.238 0.015
Dad has degree 0.238 0.104
Youth self esteem t-1 0.413 *** 0.444 ***
Age -0.027 -0.041
Number of siblings 0.047 -0.022
Youth’s number of friends 0.022 ** 0.027 **Youth worries about bullying -0.416 *** -0.399***Youth happy at school 0.238 *** 0.385***
Talks to mum about important things 0.189 ** 0.306***
Talks to Dad about important things 0.080 0.095N 1266 1196
R squared 0.31 0.37
Summary of findings• Low maternal life satisfaction in the previous observation
associated with declined youth self-esteem in current observation
• Effect remains when a range of control variables are included in the model, although becomes smaller
• Paternal life satisfaction not related once additional controls added to model
• Association exists for both male and female youths
• Effect may be direct or related to a common stressor
• Effect not restricted to younger children
Conclusions and further directions• Within the family, frequent interactions take place and
considerable time is often spent together, it may therefore be the case that family member’s own states of wellbeing may influence each other’s.
• The importance of the family context for the child and their vulnerability to parental stress is suggested
• Support to parents will also likely benefit their child’s self-esteem
• Impact of different family types• Further work on causal relationships• Examine the role of specific family stressors• Alternative measures
Thank-you for listening
Debbie [email protected]