dearth of policy innovation

16
Dearth of Policy Innovation I Prosper Yao Tsikata, Msc.; M.A.; M.S.; Ph.D. Student

Upload: prosper-tsikata

Post on 14-Jun-2015

312 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Dearth of Policy InnovationI

Prosper Yao Tsikata, Msc.; M.A.; M.S.; Ph.D. Student

Page 2: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Little Investment, Big Returns

• Ghana spends US$128 million on road accidents annually, 1.6% of the country’s GDP

• 16,000 people are killed and 15,000 seriously injured in these accidents

• Evidentially, accident rates are on the ascendancy in Ghana

Page 3: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Deaths from Accidents

1994 1998 20070

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Page 4: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Why Accidents are Persistently High

• Over-speeding • Overloading • Non-observation of traffic rules • Lack of effective and continued law

enforcement • Non-standardized method of issuing

driving licenses and testing • Alcohol and drug use

Page 5: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Alteration of Seats

Page 6: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Environment Danger

Page 7: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Lack of space to Pull out victims

Page 8: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Imminent Danger on Vehicles

Page 9: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Enforcement Failures

Page 10: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Enforcement in other Jurisdictions

• In 2009, the city of Chicago raised US$64 million from 376 cameras at 187 red light intersections

Page 11: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Application of Speed Cameras

Page 12: Dearth of Policy Innovation

How it works

Page 13: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Police Traffic Patrol

Page 14: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Personal Experience

• Paid US$820.00 in three months• Attended Court once in

Maryland• That made me to become extra

careful or cautious on the road to avoid the fines and withdrawal of my license

Page 15: Dearth of Policy Innovation

Position on this Issue

• If it costs the Ghanaian Economy US$128 million or 1.6% of her GDP annually, it means inaction in reforming and implementing surveillance and prevention is a choice.

• Just 10% of the US$128 million can improve surveillance and prevention

Page 16: Dearth of Policy Innovation

End

•Q & A