dean l. fixsen michelle a. duda barbara sims pbs leadership forum 2009 integrated systems to support...
TRANSCRIPT
Dean L. Fixsen
Michelle A. Duda
Barbara Sims
PBS Leadership Forum 2009
Integrated Systems to Support Implementation
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Education Improvement
Innovative practices do not fare well in existing organizational structures and systems
© Fixsen & Blase, 2008
Performance Assessment
Coaching
Training
Selection
Systems Intervention
Facilitative Administration
Decision Support Data System
Adaptive
Technical
Integrated & Compensatory
Com
pete
ncy
Driv
ers
Com
pete
ncy
Driv
ers Organization D
rivers
Organization D
rivers
LeadershipLeadership
Use Innovations for Student Benefits Teachers & Staff
Graphics by Steve Goodman
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
1 for the State
All Students & Families
All Students & Families
Building Teachers and Staff
Building Teachers and Staff
Building Leadership and Implementation
Team
Building Leadership and Implementation
Team
“District” Leadership and Implementation
Teams
“District” Leadership and Implementation
Teams
How is Support Provided to
1,800 Schools, 100,000 Staff and 750,000
Students?
1 for every group of 30 Buildings (N = 60 District Teams)
1 for every 10 RITs(N = 1.5 State Teams)
1 for each School Building(N = 1,800 Building Teams)
Provide effective practices to educate and support students
Improved academic and behavior outcomes
Regional Implementation
Teams
Regional Implementation
Teams
State Transformation
Team
State Transformation
Team
StateDepartment of
Education Leadership
StateDepartment of
Education Leadership
1 for every group of 4 District Teams (N = 15 Regional Teams)
Graphics by Steve Goodman
Selection, TrainingCoaching, Evaluation Organization SupportsSystems Integration
Selection, TrainingCoaching, Evaluation Organization SupportsSystems Integration
Selection, TrainingCoaching, Evaluation Organization SupportsSystems Integration
Selection, TrainingCoaching, Evaluation Organization SupportsSystems Integration
© Fixsen & Blase, 2008
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Implementation Science
Impl. Team NO Impl. Team
Effective
NOT Effective
IMPLEMENTATION
INT
ER
VE
NT
ION
80%, 3 Yrs 14%, 17 Yrs
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Costs and Savings
Implementation Costs & Savings(Inflation Adjusted)
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
1 Yr Pre During PostYear 1
PostYear 2
PostYear 3
Ch
ang
e in
Bu
dg
et (
Per
cen
t)
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Do the Math
Teachers and Staff
School Team
District Team
Regional Team
State Transformation Team
Outcome = .33
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.80
State Management
Team
Implementation Team
InnovationTeachersStudents
Po
licy En
abled
P
ractice (PE
P)
Pra
ctic
e In
form
ed
Po
licy
(P
IP)
Sys
tem
C
han
ge
SIS
EP
Sys
tem
Ch
ang
e S
up
po
rt
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Making use of Science
• Letting it happeno Recipients are accountable
• Helping it happeno Recipients are accountable
• Making it happeno Implementation teams are accountable
Based on Greenhalgh, Robert, MacFarlane, Bate, & Kyriakidou, 2004
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Initiating and Managing Change
Implementation Team(s)General Definition: Core group of individuals, who represent implementation expertise drawn from the various EBPs in use in a State, and who are charged with guiding the overall implementation process
Benefits: Provides a focused and accountable structure to increase the likelihood that this effort will be sustained over time
Scope of the initiative determines the scope of authority and the need for linked Implementation Teams
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Implementation Team
• A group that knows your state initiatives very well (formal and practice knowledge)
• A group that knows how to implement innovations with fidelity and good effect
• A group that accumulates data & experiential knowledge -- more effective and efficient over time (information economics, K. Arrow)
State Management
Group
State Transformation
Team
Regional Implementation
Team
N = 50 – 200 Schools
First Regional Implementation
Team
N = 50 – 200 Schools
Regional Implementation
Team
N = 50 – 200 Schools
Regional Implementation
Team
N = 50 – 200 Schools
IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY FOR
SCALING UP EBPs
SIS
EP
Su
pp
ort
+ 2
FT
E
Too many overqualified
people
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Collaborative Efforts for
School Improvement
for All Students
Standards Aligned Curriculum
Evidenced-based Practices
Differentiation for Academic and
Behavior
SustainabilityFamily
3 Tiered Model of InterventionDistrict Leadership
Team Based Implementation
Universal Screening
Data-based Decision Making
Progress Monitoring
Common Core Concepts
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Common Core Elements
Leadership & Commitment
Family & Community Partners
Team Based Implementation
Data Based Decision Process
Evidence Based Practices
Professional Development & Coaching
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Non-Negotiables
Family involvement/drivenDistrict leadership team -- external and internal coach structureDirect teaching and pre-correctionsCommunication to entire staffGuided practice with feedbackReinforcementData based decision making with universal screener and progress monitoringProblem solving protocol with decision rulesDifferentiated Instruction
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Non-NegotiablesUnderstanding for ALL the three tiered model of support
Access and equity including LRE/EE students in their home school and least restrictive intervention/environment
Coaching: 7 norms, effective meetings, and data driven
Teaming/collaborating
Adaptations
Effective classroom teaching strategies
Teaming
Professional learning communities
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Integrated Systemfor Student Achievement
District System:
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Integrated System for Student Achievement
Develop a multi-tiered statewide system of school improvement making education more effective and more efficient
Support districts in the development of an infrastructure and processes necessary to implement and sustain evidence based practices
Work within the context of the District Improvement Plan, this support will include a focus on the core elements
SYSTEMS
PRACTICESDAT
A
SupportingStaff Behavior
SupportingStudent Behavior
OUTCOMES
Supporting Social Competence, Academic Achievement and Safety
SupportingDecisionMaking
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
District Leadership Team
Necessary
Superintendent (or designee)
Director of Curriculum & Instruction
Director of Special Education
Board Member
Family member (not a district employee)
Union representative
District Level Coach*
Encouraged
ROE
RESPRO
Community Partner
Principal
Data Manager
Special Ed Cooperative Representative
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Approach to Districts
Installation
District team membership
ISSA Agreement
3-6 meetings to address core concepts
Initial Implementation Development of Action Plan via District Improvement Plan
Using Timetable start building system
Problem Solve with District as roadblocks occur
Collect information about what policies/practices need changing
Work to resolve on regional/state/federal level
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
For More InformationState Implementation and Scaling up of Evidence-
based Practices (SISEP)
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, George Sugai
www.scalingup.org
“Resources” Tab
Concept paper
Annotated bibliography
Data on scaling up
Scaling up Briefs
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
For More InformationDean L. Fixsen, Ph.D.
919-966-3892
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D.
919-636-0843
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC
www.scalingup.org http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/
http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~nirn/resources/publications/Monograph/
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
For More Information
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
Download all or part of the monograph at:
http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~nirn/resources/detail.cfm?resourceID=31
Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2009
Thank YouWe thank the following for their support
Annie E. Casey Foundation (EBPs and cultural competence)
William T. Grant Foundation (implementation literature review)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (implementation strategies grants; NREPP reviews; SOC analyses of implementation; national implementation awards)
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (implementation research contract)
National Institute of Mental Health (research and training grants)
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (program development and evaluation grants
Office of Special Education Programs (Capacity Development Center contract)
Agency for Children and Families (Child Welfare Leadership Development contract)