d&c 051911 - m3s

5
_______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Report Information from ProQuest September 12 2011 16:19 _______________________________________________________________

Upload: monroeexposed

Post on 02-Mar-2015

28 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

_______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

Report Information from ProQuestSeptember 12 2011 16:19

_______________________________________________________________

Document 1 of 1

New York state probes $224 million Monroe County project Andreatta, David; Terreri, Jill. Rochester Democrat and Chronicle [Rochester, N.Y] 19 May 2011.

_______________________________________________________________ Find a copy

_______________________________________________________________ Abstract A Monroe County local development corporation and its primary contractor managing a $224 million

upgrade of the county's emergency communications system have been subpoenaed by state

Attorney General Eric Schneiderman for documentation about their formation and business practices.

_______________________________________________________________ Full Text A Monroe County local development corporation and its primary contractor managing a $224

million upgrade of the county's emergency communications system have been subpoenaed

by state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman for documentation about their formation and

business practices.

Meanwhile, state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli notified the county this week that its

relationship with the local development corporation, Monroe Security and Safety Systems,

also known as M3SLDC, would be audited.

The impending audit and subpoenas issued to M3SLDC and its contractor, Navitech

Services Corp., this week suggest a broad investigation into the makeup of the organization,

whose existence has been mired in controversy since its inception two years ago.

Another company, Harris Corp., whose winning bid for a subcontract to supply safety

equipment to first-responders was $11 million higher than a competing firm, also was

subpoenaed.

The local development corporation was established by the Republican-controlled County

Legislature in 2009 at the behest of County Executive Maggie Brooks, who said at the time

that it would be less costly for the county to upgrade its communications infrastructure by

contracting with an LDC than to do the job itself.

It was unclear precisely what aspects of M3SLDC's operations the state is seeking to

examine.

But charges previously leveled by critics of the organization, almost all of whom have been

Democratic county and state lawmakers, are that M3SLDC was created under false

pretenses, lacks transparency and that its procurement practices are rife with conflicts of

interest.

Spokespeople for the state's Attorney General and Comptroller offices declined to comment

on the state's investigation.

In separate telephone interviews, representatives of the county, the local development

corporation and Navitech acknowledged receiving the subpoenas and notification of the audit

this week.

They characterized the information sought by the attorney general as "routine" and said they

would cooperate.

None expressed concern about the demands, but all were at a loss to explain why the

organization was suddenly facing such intense scrutiny.

"I really don't know why we're being subpoenaed, but I know we're going to cooperate fully

with them," said Charles "Hank" Stuart, chairman of the M3SLDC board. "We try to run a

very transparent and open LDC."

Richard Bell, a partner at the law firm of Gates &Adams who manages the project for

M3SLDC, said most of the documentation sought has been aired at public meetings, is

subject to open-records laws and, in some cases, readily available on the local development

corporation's website.

"The information they're looking for is fairly routine," Bell said. "It is a very broad subpoena

and we'll deal with it. But again, this is almost exclusively public information."

The subpoenas gave the companies a deadline of May 31 to comply.

Steve Gleason, the chief operating officer of Navitech, said he is confident the inquiry would

turn up nothing of consequence.

"We don't have any basis whatsoever to be concerned about adverse findings," Gleason

said.

Local development corporations are private, nonprofit entities that can issue debt and borrow

money without the oversight of the government that created them, and they are not required

to comply with public procurement laws for competitive bidding, though many do.

They are also not subject to open-records laws, although the Brooks administration has said

county local development corporations would comply with open-records requests.

Most troubling to critics of M3SLDC's approach to the communications systems overhaul,

however, is the labyrinth of companies that appear to be carrying out the business.

For example, the county contracts with M3SLDC to manage and finance the project.

M3SLDC contracts with Navitech, a startup company, to oversee the upgrades. Navitech

contracts with another company called NaviChase, a subsidiary of LeChase Construction, to

hire subcontractors to perform the work.

The county is paying for the project through a 20-year contract with M3SLDC, yet none of the

contracts issued by Navitech or, subsequently, NaviChase, are subject to public review.

Ted O'Brien, the County Legislature's Democratic minority leader, welcomed the news of the

investigation.

"I hope that there isn't substantial wrongdoing uncovered here ... but if the legislature is not

going to be able to provide oversight here, it will be comforting to have state agencies looking

at what has transpired and making sure that what has been done has been done for a

legitimate purpose," O'Brien said.

The county has defended the arrangement as being in the best interest of the taxpayers and

in compliance with all applicable laws.

County spokesman Noah Lebowitz questioned Wednesday why the state attorney general

resorted to issuing subpoenas.

"The information (being sought) appears to be routine in nature," Lebowitz said.

"It's certainly puzzling that they chose to issue a subpoena instead of calling us and asking

for the documents."

Schneiderman is scheduled to address the Monroe County Bar Association in Rochester on

Friday.

[email protected]

[email protected]

ID_Code: A2201110105190331

_______________________________________________________________ Indexing (details)

Subjects Subpoenas, County executives, Public records

Title New York state probes $224 million Monroe County project

Authors Andreatta, David; Terreri, Jill

Publication title Rochester Democrat and Chronicle

Publication year 2011

Publication Date May 19, 2011

Year 2011

Section NEWS

Publisher Gannett Co., Inc.

Place of Publication Rochester, N.Y.

Country of publication United States

Source type Newspapers

Language of Publication English

Document type News

Subfile Subpoenas, County executives, Public records

ProQuest Document ID 867493508

Document URL http://ezproxy.drake.brockport.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.proqu

est.com/docview/867493508?accountid=26985

Copyright Copyright 2011 - Rochester Democrat and Chronicle NY - All Rights

Reserved

Last updated 2011-05-20

Database Rochester Democrat and Chronicle

<< Link to document in ProQuest

_______________________________________________________________ Contact ProQuest 2010 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. - Terms and Conditions