day 2. programming for results. cpp matrice des résultats cpp hiérarchie des résultats –...
TRANSCRIPT
Day 2.Programming for results
CPF results matrix
CPF Results Hierarchy – definitions
1
CPF result Definition Remarks:
IMPACT
(Contribute)
Contribution that FAO is expected to make towards national priorities – long terms development changes
Derived from Gvt priorities/objectives
OUTCOME3-5
outcomes (Attribute)
Measurable uptake and use of FAOs outputs (products and services) within the CPF time frame. What changes do we see in individuals and organizations applying FAOs outputs…learning
Challenge: Find indicator to measure change and contribute to higher level indicators and is consistent with output/project indicators
OUTPUTS3 outputs = 1
outcome(Deliver)
Significant and measurable result/ deliverable of FAOs activities in the country
SMART RESULTS
Specific in terms of the nature and scope of achievements and changes sought, the target groups and geographical area etc.
(should also reflect only one and not multiple results in one single statement)
Measurable: measurable quantitatively and/or qualitatively; data will be available when needed within the time period
Achievable and time-bound in CPF period with the resources available
Relevant to national priorities and FAO’s mandate; substantial, necessary and sufficient
Matrice des résultatsRésultats du CPP Indicateurs, données
de référence et objectif
Moyens et sources de vérification
Hypothèses
Domaine prioritaire (2)Effet 1 (1)
Produit 1.a(5)
Produit 1.b
Résultat régional / organisationnel (4)
Effet de l’UNDAF(3)
Changements que nous observons chez les individus et les organisations qui utilisent
les produits de la FAO ?
Actions, projects et programme réalisés par la FAO dans le pays - Résultats significatifs et mesurables Permettent le suivi-
évaluation des résultats et des progrès accomplis dans l’exécution du CPP
Support d’information permettant de vérifier les indicateurs
Les conditions nécessaires qui doivent exister si l’on veut que les relations de cause à effet entre les niveaux de résultats fonctionnent
SMART
Results chain – country examples
Establishment of Land Information Service
Strengthened national capacity to generate land use data
Land distribution and management practices improved
Sustainable management of natural resources
Activities, Projects
CPF outputs
CPF outcome
CPF impact
SMART
KEY to success:National partners
create and use outputs
TIPs on formulating Capacity Development
outcomes and indicators at the level of
IndividualsOrganizations
Enabling environment
Capacity development OUTCOME statements should reflect
• HOW will outputs contribute to the intended changes of the key actors or in organizational practices in the national system.
• WHAT are the potential changes in the medium-term for the enabling environment, organizations or individual practices
• WHICH CAPACITIEs (individual, organizational, enabling environment) will need to be developed to allow the change
Individual level: CD outcomes and indicators
Outcome describes if individuals (e.g. farmers, local staff, food producers) are applying and using the knowledge acquired.
Indicators (examples):• N. of farmers (or fishermen) who
changed their practices, behavior• N. of staff following new standards• N. of food producers who apply
the new knowledge to increase food production
• Outcomes describes whether organizations are delivering their services, accomplishing their mandates or performing more efficiently.
• Indicators (examples):– Number of communities that can
develop an action plan– Number of extension units in the
country delivery their services effectively
– Improved management practices (e.g. M&E system)
– Improved information sharing among the organizations
Organizational level: CD outcomes and indicators
• Outcome: state whether the policy, legislative or institutional framework allow implementation of a change process.
• Indicators (examples): – New policies, plans and programes adopted– New policies and strategies implemented
Enabling environment: CD outcomes and indicators
HOW TO DEFINE CPF OUTPUTS AND OUTCOMES -
checklist
• Checklist: Six criteria for good result statementsGroup work: defining outcome and outputs
• How to define risks and assumptionsGroup work: defining risks and assumptions of CPF
Is the result defined on the right level (outputs - outcome)?
Is the result as clear as possible?
Does the result express only a single idea?
Does the result – to the extent possible - explicitly describe WHAT is the change and WHO is benefiting from the change?
Does the result express a change rather than a process?
Is the result as specific as possible?
CHECK-LIST A few criteria to assess/define CPF results*
CRITERION 1:
Is the CPF result defined on the right level (outputs vs. outcome)?
REMARK ON CAPACITY-BUILDING:
Someone has (improved) capacity to do something different or better- > CPF output, not outcome
Example: “Ministry of Environment has the capacity to monitor protected areas”
Example: “Government is better able to formulate gender-sensitive policies”
Someone actually does something different or better- > CPF outcome
Example: “Ministry of Environment effectively monitors protected areas”
Example: “Government formulates policies which are sensitive to gender”
similar logic applies to „having access to …“
CRITERION 2:
Does the CPF result express only a single idea?
“More and better skilled youth and women have decent job opportunities”
if more than a single idea is captured in a result (‘compound result’), it tends to:
distort the clear, logical linkages within the results chain makes monitoring and reporting more complex and
cumbersome can include different levels of results in one result statement
look out for dangerous phrases like ‘through’, ‘for’, ‘and’, ‘in order to’, ‘which contribute to’, ‘with a focus on’
-> consider revising and narrowing down to a single idea, or
-> consider splitting up into more than 1 result
CRITERION 6:
Is the CPF result as specific as possible?
ask the following
questions:
specify: Example
INITIAL OUTCOME:
More and better trained students graduate
By how much?
+ quantity Number of graduates increased from 50.000 to 145.000
What kind of change?
+ quality The number of graduates passing standard exams has increased from 50.000 to 145.000
By when? + time frame By 2016, the number of graduates passing standard exams has increased from 50.000 to 145.000
For whom? + target group
By 2016, the number of graduates from lower income families passing standard exams has increased from 50.000 to 145.000 in year three of project
Where? + location MORE SPECIFIC OUTCOME:By 2016, the number of graduates from lower income families passing standard exams in northern and north-eastern regions has increased from 50.000 to 145.000
CRITERION 6:
Is the CPF result as specific as possible?
ask the following
questions:
specify: Example
INITIAL CPF OUTCOME : Improved nutritional status of vulnerable groups
By how much? + quantity reduced from 9% to 7%
What kind of change?
+ quality acute malnutrition
By when? + time frame by 2016
For whom? + target group vulnerable groups = children under 5 with acute malnutrition
Where? + location in Northern Country Undafistan
MORE SPECIFIC UNDAF OUTCOME:By 2016, the proportion of children under 5 with acute malnutrition in Northern Undafistan has been reduced from 9% to 7%
Is the result defined on the right level (outputs - outcome)?
Is the result as clear as possible?
Does the result express only a single idea?
Does the result – to the extent possible - explicitly describe right-holders and duty-bearers?
Does the result express a change rather than a process?
Is the result as specific as possible?
CHECK-LIST Six criteria how to assess/define CPF results*
*or: SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time-Bound)
Example of CPF outcome and indicators:
Outcome 3.2: Policies, regulations and legal issues addressed to promote competitive agro-enterprise development among smallholder farmers and small and medium scale enterprises. (G01)
Indicators: • By 2015, GoN initiated policy reforms to help small producers to
increase value addition and participate in changing markets (Contribution to OR Indicator G01P2 /01)
• By 2015, No. programmes/ projects where policies, regulations, and laws relating to agribusiness are being enforced (Contribution to OR Indicator G01P2 /01)
38
Linkages between CPF and UNDAF
1
Ensure logical link between CPF and UNDAF results: • CPF impact coincides with UNDAF outcomes• CPF outcomes contribute to UNDAF outputs • CPF outputs are incorporated as activities in UNDAF action plan
Apply flexibly, ONE size may not fit all situations
Linkages between CPF and UNDAF results chain
CPF Results Matrix – Part B – Resource requirements
CPF priorities and results
Indicative resource requirements
Implementing partners
Resource partners
Total Available funding
RM gap National International
CPF priority 1…
Outcome 1
Output/ type of intervention
This is the basis for the
preparation of the RM strategy and action plan
Results matrix and Resource Mobilization
Results matrix and resource mobilization
CPF results matrix will help you:• Define the outcomes and outputs you
aim to engage resource partners on – who may fund a % of the CPF, or wish to see a project packaged around a particular CPF outcome
• The RM target will become clearer – make sure it is realistic!