day 1 ela sessions - standards institute · day 1 ela sessions the foundation for success in...
TRANSCRIPT
3Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
CollegeandCareerAnchorStandardsforReading............................................................................4
ELAReadingStandards6-12..............................................................................................................5
Let’sTakePoe…..............................................................................................................................10
QualitativeMeasures:Literature....................................................................................................11
QualitativeMeasures:Informational..............................................................................................12
FromAChristmasCarolCharlesDickens.........................................................................................13ReadersandTaskConsiderations....................................................................................................14
AdvancingOurStudents’LanguageandLiteracy.............................................................................15
KnowingWhatYouAreSeeing:HungerGames...............................................................................18AcademicVocabulary.....................................................................................................................19
CollegeandCareerReadinessAnchorStandardsforSpeakingandListening...................................21
Excerptfrom“EveryLittleHurricane”byShermanAlexie...............................................................22
From“EveryLittleHurricane”PART2.............................................................................................25
KnowingWhatYouAreSeeing:TheLottery....................................................................................26PullingitAllTogether.....................................................................................................................27
QualitativeDimensionsofTextComplexity....................................................................................28
10Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
Let’sTakePoe….
And,%here%and%there,%in%groves%about%this%grass,%like%wildernesses%of%dreams,%sprang%up%fantas8c%trees,%whose%tall%slender%stems%stood%not%upright,%but%slanted%gracefully%towards%the%light%that%peered%at%noon;day%into%the%centre%of%the%valley.%Their%bark%was%speckled%with%the%vivid%alternate%splendor%of%ebony%and%silver,%and%was%smoother%than%all%save%the%cheeks%of%Eleonora;%so,%that%but%for%the%brilliant%green%of%the%huge%leaves%that%spread%from%their%summits%in%long,%tremulous%lines,%dallying%with%the%Zephyrs,%one%might%have%fancied%them%giant%serpents%of%Syria%doing%homage%to%their%Sovereign%the%Sun.%%
! ! !from%Eleonora%by%Edgar%Allen%Poe!%
Let’s%take%Poe,%for%example…%
12Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
QualitativeMeasures:Informational
CCSS
Gra
de B
ands
Stim
ulus
Titl
eSt
imul
us A
utho
rLe
xile
SRRM
M
2-3
420-
820
0.36
-5.6
23.
53-6
.13
Lexi
le4-
574
0-10
103.
97-8
.40
5.42
-7.9
2So
urce
Rat
er6-
892
5-11
855.
85-1
0.87
7.04
-9.5
7
Rea
ding
Mat
urity
Met
ric9-
1010
50-1
335
8.41
-12.
268.
41-1
0.81
11-C
CR11
85-1
385
9.62
-13.
479.
57-1
2.00
Crit
eria
Very
Com
plex
Mar
k ( if
pre
sent
)M
oder
atel
y C
ompl
exM
ark
( if p
rese
nt)
Rea
dily
Acc
essi
ble
Mar
k ( if
pre
sent
)
MEA
NIN
G
Mul
tiple
leve
ls o
f mea
ning
that
may
be
diffi
cult
to id
entif
y, s
epar
ate,
and
inte
rpre
t; th
eme
is
impl
icit,
sub
tle, o
r am
bigu
ous
and
may
be
reve
aled
ove
r the
ent
irety
of t
he te
xt
Mul
tiple
leve
ls o
f mea
ning
that
are
rela
tivel
y ea
sy
to id
entif
y; th
eme
is c
lear
but
may
be
conv
eyed
w
ith s
ome
subt
lety
One
leve
l of m
eani
ng; t
hem
e is
obv
ious
and
re
veal
ed e
arly
in th
e te
xt
TEXT
STR
UC
TUR
E
Pro
se o
r poe
try in
clud
es m
ore
intri
cate
el
emen
ts s
uch
as s
ubpl
ots,
shi
fts in
poi
nt-o
f-vi
ew, s
hifts
in ti
me,
or n
on-s
tand
ard
text
st
ruct
ures
Pro
se in
clud
es tw
o or
mor
e st
oryl
ines
or h
as a
plo
t th
at is
som
ewha
t diff
icul
t to
pred
ict (
e.g.
; in
the
case
of a
non
-line
ar p
lot);
poe
try h
as s
ome
impl
icit
or u
npre
dict
able
stru
ctur
al e
lem
ents
Pro
se o
r poe
try is
org
aniz
ed c
lear
ly a
nd/o
r ch
rono
logi
cally
; the
eve
nts
in a
pro
se w
ork
are
easy
to p
redi
ct b
ecau
se th
e pl
ot is
line
ar; p
oetry
ha
s ex
plic
it an
d pr
edic
tabl
e st
ruct
ural
ele
men
ts
LAN
GU
AGE
FEAT
UR
ES
Lang
uage
is g
ener
ally
com
plex
, with
abs
tract
, iro
nic,
and
/or f
igur
ativ
e la
ngua
ge, a
nd re
gula
rly
incl
udes
arc
haic
, unf
amili
ar, a
nd a
cade
mic
w
ords
; tex
t use
s a
varie
ty o
f sen
tenc
e st
ruct
ures
, inc
ludi
ng c
ompl
ex s
ente
nces
with
su
bord
inat
e ph
rase
s an
d cl
ause
s
Lang
uage
is o
ften
expl
icit
and
liter
al b
ut in
clud
es
acad
emic
, arc
haic
, or o
ther
wor
ds w
ith c
ompl
ex
mea
ning
(e.g
; fig
urat
ive
lang
uage
); te
xt u
ses
a va
riety
of s
ente
nce
stru
ctur
es
Lang
uage
is e
xplic
it an
d lit
eral
, with
mos
tly
cont
empo
rary
and
fam
iliar
voc
abul
ary;
text
use
s m
ostly
sim
ple
sent
ence
s
KN
OW
LED
GE
DEM
AND
S
The
text
exp
lore
s co
mpl
ex, s
ophi
stic
ated
, or
abst
ract
them
es; t
ext i
s de
pend
ent o
n al
lusi
ons
to o
ther
text
s or
cul
tura
l ele
men
ts; a
llusi
ons
or
refe
renc
es h
ave
no c
onte
xt a
nd re
quire
in
fere
nce
and
eval
uatio
n
The
text
exp
lore
s se
vera
l the
mes
; tex
t mak
es fe
w
refe
renc
es o
r allu
sion
s to
oth
er te
xts
or c
ultu
ral
elem
ents
; the
mea
ning
of r
efer
ence
s or
allu
sion
s m
ay b
e pa
rtial
ly e
xpla
ined
in c
onte
xt
The
text
exp
lore
s a
sing
le th
eme;
if th
ere
are
any
refe
renc
es o
r allu
sion
s, th
ey a
re fu
lly
expl
aine
d in
the
text
USE
OF
GR
APH
ICS
(Opt
iona
l)
Whe
n gr
aphi
cs a
re p
rese
nt, t
he c
onne
ctio
n be
twee
n th
e te
xt a
nd g
raph
ics
is s
ubtle
and
re
quire
s in
terp
reta
tion
Gra
phic
s su
ppor
t int
erpr
etat
ion
of s
elec
ted
parts
of
the
corr
espo
ndin
g w
ritte
n te
xt; t
hey
may
intro
duce
so
me
new
and
rele
vant
info
rmat
ion
Gra
phic
s su
ppor
t and
ass
ist i
n in
terp
retin
g te
xt
by d
irect
ly re
pres
entin
g im
porta
nt c
once
pts
from
th
e co
rres
pond
ing
writ
ten
text
AUD
IO S
TIM
ULU
S(O
ptio
nal)
Spo
ken
lang
uage
is a
cade
mic
, abs
tract
, and
/ or
arc
haic
, and
the
dial
ogue
est
ablis
hes
mea
ning
that
is o
ften
impl
icit;
the
cont
ent
seld
om o
verla
ps w
ith th
e co
nten
t in
the
text
w
ith w
hich
it is
pai
red,
and
the
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
the
two
text
s is
sub
tle a
nd in
trica
te
Spo
ken
lang
uage
incl
udes
som
e ar
chai
c an
d ac
adem
ic v
ocab
ular
y, a
nd th
e di
alog
ue
esta
blis
hes
mea
ning
that
is s
omet
imes
impl
icit;
the
cont
ent i
ntro
duce
s so
me
idea
s no
t pre
sent
in th
e te
xt w
ith w
hich
it is
pai
red
Spo
ken
lang
uage
is s
impl
e, c
onve
rsat
iona
l, an
d/or
fam
iliar
, and
the
dial
ogue
est
ablis
hes
mea
ning
that
is h
ighl
y ex
plic
it, s
traig
htfo
rwar
d,
and
easy
to u
nder
stan
d; th
e co
nten
t bea
rs a
cl
ear r
elat
ions
hip
to c
onte
nt in
the
text
with
w
hich
it is
pai
red
and
may
eve
n re
peat
the
sam
e la
ngua
ge
VISU
AL/V
IDEO
STI
MU
LUS
(Opt
iona
l)
The
visu
al p
rese
ntat
ion
is e
ssen
tial f
or g
aini
ng
a de
eper
und
erst
andi
ng o
f the
text
with
whi
ch it
is
pai
red;
it m
ay p
rovi
de a
dditi
onal
info
rmat
ion
not o
ther
wis
e co
nvey
ed in
the
text
The
visu
al p
rese
ntat
ion
is m
ainl
y su
pple
men
tal t
o un
ders
tand
ing
the
text
with
whi
ch it
is p
aire
d; it
is
fairl
y ea
sy to
und
erst
and
but n
ot e
ntire
ly p
redi
ctab
le
The
visu
al p
rese
ntat
ion
is e
asy
to u
nder
stan
d; it
en
gage
s th
e re
ader
mor
e th
an it
enh
ance
s un
ders
tand
ing
of th
e te
xt w
ith w
hich
it is
pai
red
Gra
de L
evel
Com
plex
ity L
evel
Not
es
Lite
rary
Com
plex
ity A
naly
sis
Wor
kshe
et
Qua
litat
ive
Anal
ysis
: rub
ric to
ana
lyze
text
com
plex
ity a
nd p
lace
a te
xt w
ithin
a s
peci
fic g
rade
Qua
ntita
tive
Anal
ysis
: Com
pute
r-ba
sed
quan
titat
ive
tool
s us
ed to
ana
lyze
text
com
plex
ity a
nd re
com
men
d pl
acem
ent o
f a te
xt w
ithin
a g
rade
ban
d.
Text
-Ana
lysi
s Too
ls
*Tex
ts su
ch a
s poe
try,
dra
ma,
tran
scrip
ts, a
nd th
ose
depi
ctin
g st
ep-
by-s
tep
proc
esse
s will
be
assig
ned
a gr
ade
leve
l bas
ed o
n a
qual
itativ
e ev
alua
tion
NO
TES
Brie
fly e
xpla
in re
com
men
ded
plac
emen
t bas
ed o
n yo
ur c
onsi
dera
tion
of th
e Q
uant
itativ
e an
d Q
ualit
ativ
e re
sults
reco
rded
abo
ve.
Fina
l Pla
cem
ent R
ecom
men
datio
n
13Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
FromAChristmasCarolCharlesDickens
Marleywasdead:tobeginwith.Thereisnodoubtwhateveraboutthat.Theregisterofhis
burialwassignedbytheclergyman,theclerk,theundertaker,andthechiefmourner.Scrooge
signedit.AndScrooge'snamewasgoodupon'Change,foranythinghechosetoputhishand
to.
OldMarleywasasdeadasadoor-nail.
Mind!Idon'tmeantosaythatIknow,ofmyownknowledge,whatthereisparticularlydead
aboutadoor-nail.Imighthavebeeninclined,myself,toregardacoffin-nailasthedeadest
pieceofironmongeryinthetrade.Butthewisdomofourancestorsisinthesimile;andmy
unhallowedhandsshallnotdisturbit,ortheCountry'sdonefor.Youwillthereforepermitme
torepeat,emphatically,thatMarleywasasdeadasadoor-nail.
Scroogeknewhewasdead?Ofcoursehedid.Howcoulditbeotherwise?Scroogeandhewere
partnersforIdon'tknowhowmanyyears.Scroogewashissoleexecutor,hissole
administrator,hissoleassign,hissoleresiduarylegatee,hissolefriend,andsolemourner.And
evenScroogewasnotsodreadfullycutupbythesadevent,butthathewasanexcellentman
ofbusinessontheverydayofthefuneral,andsolemnizeditwithanundoubtedbargain.The
mentionofMarley'sfuneralbringsmebacktothepointIstartedfrom.Thereisnodoubtthat
Marleywasdead.Thismustbedistinctlyunderstood,ornothingwonderfulcancomeofthe
storyIamgoingtorelate.IfwewerenotperfectlyconvincedthatHamlet'sFatherdiedbefore
theplaybegan,therewouldbenothingmoreremarkableinhistakingastrollatnight,inan
easterlywind,uponhisownramparts,thantherewouldbeinanyothermiddle-aged
gentlemanrashlyturningoutafterdarkinabreezyspot--saySaintPaul'sChurchyardfor
instance--literallytoastonishhisson'sweakmind.
15Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
AdvancingOurStudents’LanguageandLiteracy
AMERICAN EDUCATOR | WINTER 2010–2011 3
Advancing Our Students’ Language and Literacy
The Challenge of Complex Texts
By Marilyn Jager Adams
“Few Changes on SAT Posted by Class of 2010.”1 “Scores on SAT College Entrance Test Hold Steady.”2 “Class of 2008 Matches ’07 on the SAT.”3 Year by year, point by point, it is hard to see the
real news in these headlines. The real news is not that the SAT scores have held steady. The real news is that the SAT scores haven’t increased. The SAT scores of our college-bound students
have been languishing not for one or two years, but for a long time. Several decades ago, scores were much higher.
The SAT score decline began in 1962, nearly 50 years ago. From 1962 to 1980, math scores fell 36 points to 492 while verbal scores fell 54 points to 502. Since 1980, the math scores have been gradu-ally climbing back and are now at 516. Fluctuations aside, the verbal scores remain unchanged, even today stuck at 502.
If I were writing the headline for the next newspaper story on the SATs, here’s what you’d see: “Seniors and Their SAT Scores Sabotaged by Low-Level Textbooks.” And if the copyeditor would let me, I’d add an exclamation point! The literacy level of our sec-ondary students is languishing because the kids are not reading what they need to be reading. This is a strong claim. Let me lay out the evidence and argument so you can judge for yourself.
Not Just the SAT ScoresTo be sure, whether scores on the SAT exams truly reflect relevant or important intellectual or academic proficiencies remains a topic of discussion.4 Yet, the SATs are not the only indication that
Marilyn Jager Adams is a research professor in the Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences Department of Brown University and former chief scientist for Soliloquy Learning Inc. She is the author of numerous scholarly papers and several books, including two landmark works: Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print and Phonemic Awareness in Young Children. This article is adapted with permission of the Guilford Press from “The Challenge of Advanced Texts: The Interde-pendence of Reading and Learning,” which Adams wrote for Reading More, Reading Better, edited by Elfrieda H. Hiebert, copyright 2009 by Guilford Press. IL
LUST
RATI
ON
S BY
NEN
AD
JA
KES
EVIC
18Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
KnowingWhatYouAreSeeing:HungerGames
CCSS.ELA-LIT.RL.9-10.1Citestrongandthoroughtextualevidencetosupportanalysisofwhatthetextsaysexplicitlyaswellas
inferencesdrawnfromthetext.
CCSS.ELA-LIT.RL.9-10.2Determineathemeorcentralideaofatextandanalyzeindetailitsdevelopmentoverthecourseofthe
text,includinghowitemergesandisshapedandrefinedbyspecificdetails;provideanobjectivesummaryofthetext.
Look-fors Notes/Evidence
Studentscitestrongandthorough
evidencetosupporttheir
assertions
Studentsanalyzeindetailhowa
themedevelopsoverthecourseof
text
Studentsanalyzehowthetheme
isshapedandrefinedthroughthe
text
Teacherexpectsevidenceand
precisionfromstudentsand
probesresponsesaccordingly
Questionsreturnstudentstothe
text
Studentscitespecificevidence
fromtext(s)tosupportanalysis,
inferences,andclaimsorallyand
inwriting
Studentsuseevidencetobuildon
eachother’sobservationsor
insightsduringdiscussionor
collaboration
22Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
Excerptfrom“EveryLittleHurricane”byShermanAlexie
Althoughitwaswinter,thenearestoceanfourhundredmilesaway,andtheTribal
Weathermanasleepbecauseofboredom,ahurricanedroppedfromtheskyin1976andfellso
hardontheSpokaneIndianReservationthatitknockedVictorfrombedandhislatest
nightmare.
ItwasJanuaryandVictorwasnineyearsold.Hewassleepinginhisbedroominthebasement
oftheHUDhousewhenithappened.Hismotherandfatherwereupstairs,hostingthelargest
NewYear’sEvepartyintribalhistory,whenthewindsincreasedandfirsttreefell.
“Goddamnit,”oneIndianyelledatanotherastheargumentbegan.“Youain’tshit,youdamn
apple!”
ThetwoIndiansragedacrosstheroomateachother.Onewastallandheavy,theotherwas
short,muscular.High-pressureandlow-pressurefronts.
ThemusicwassoloudthatVictorcouldbarelyhearthevoicesasthetwoIndiansescalatedthe
argumentintoafistfight.Soontherewerenovoicestobeheard,onlygutturalnoisesthat
couldhavebeencursesorwoodbreaking.Thenthemusicstoppedsosuddenlythatthesilence
frightenedVictor.
“Whatthefuck’sgoingon?”Victor’sfatheryelled,hisvoicecomingquicklyandwithforce.It
shookthewallsofthehouse.
“AdolphandArnoldarefightingagain,”Victor’smothersaid.AdolphandArnoldwereher
brothers,Victor’suncles.Theyalwaysfought.Hadbeenfightingsincetheverybeginning.
“Well,tellthemtogettheirgoddamnassesoutofmyhouse,”Victor’sfatheryelledagain,his
decibellevelrisingtomeetthetensioninthehouse.
“Theyalreadyleft,”Victor’smothersaid.“They’refightingoutintheyard.”
Victorheardthisandrantohiswindow.Hecouldseehisunclessluggingeachotherwithsuch
forcethattheyhadtobeinlove.Strangerswouldneverwanttohurteachotherthatbadly.
Butitwasstrangelyquiet,likeVictorwaswatchingatelevisionshowwiththevolumeturnedall
thewaydown.Hecouldhearthepartyupstairsmovetothewindows,stepontothefront
porchtowatchthebattle.
23Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
Duringotherhurricanesbroadcastonthenews,Victorhadseencrazypeopletiethemselvesto
treesonthebeach.Thosepeoplewantedtofeeltheforceofthehurricanefirsthand,wantedit
tobelikeanamusementride,butthethinropeswerebrokenandthepeoplewerebroken.
Sometimesthetreesthemselveswerepulledfromthegroundandboththetreesandthe
peopletiedtothetreeswerecarriedaway.
FromLoneRangerandTontoFistfightinHeaven,byShermanAlexiePublishedbyPerennial/AtlanticMonthlyPress,1993Thisexcerptisusedforprofessionaldevelopmentpurposesonly.ISBN978-0-06-097624-8
24Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
From“EveryLittleHurricane”PART1
Noteanddiscusswithtablepartners:1. Whatweatherwordsandphrasesdoestheauthoruse?
2. Alexieusestheparadoxoffightingataparty,twoseeminglyincompatibleeventsthat
nonethelessoccur.Whatotherexamplesofparadoxappearintheexcerpt,andwhy
mightthatbe?
3. Whichcharacterdoyoumostresemble?Why?
4. Howdoestheauthorusethestormmetaphor?
5. WhataboutthesilencefrightensVictor?
6. Summarizetheexcerptanditsuseofsymbolismandparadoxtoillustrateatheme.
25Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
From“EveryLittleHurricane”PART2
Noteanddiscusswithtablepartners:1. Whereandwhendoesthestorytakeplace?
2. Whathappensinthefirstsentence?Whatdowelearninthefirstsentence?Whatcan
weinferinthefirstsentence?
3. Whatdoweknowaboutthestorm?
4. Whatdoweknowwithcertaintyabouttheargument?Whatcanweinferaboutthe
argument?
5. Whatistheeffectoflines22-23?("Hecould…hurteachotherthatbadly.")
6. Whywouldtheauthorincludetheinformationabouthowpeoplebehaveinhurricanes?
26Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
KnowingWhatYouAreSeeing:TheLottery
CCSS.ELA-LIT.RL.9-10.1Citestrongandthoroughtextualevidencetosupportanalysisofwhatthetextsaysexplicitlyaswellas
inferencesdrawnfromthetext.
CCSS.ELA-LIT.RL.9-10.2Determineathemeorcentralideaofatextandanalyzeindetailitsdevelopmentoverthecourseofthe
text,includinghowitemergesandisshapedandrefinedbyspecificdetails;provideanobjectivesummaryofthetext.
LookFors Notes/Evidence
Studentscitestrongandthorough
evidencetosupporttheirassertions
Studentsanalyzeindetailhowatheme
developsoverthecourseoftext
Studentsanalyzehowthethemeis
shapedandrefinedthroughthetext
Teacherexpectsevidenceandprecision
fromstudentsandprobesresponses
accordingly
Questionsreturnstudentstothetext
Studentscitespecificevidencefrom
text(s)tosupportanalysis,inferences,
andclaimsorallyandinwriting
Studentsuseevidencetobuildoneach
other’sobservationsorinsightsduring
discussionorcollaboration
27
Session1:TheFoundationGrades6-12
PullingitAllTogether
Note/Identifythefollowingasyouviewthevideo:
Comparethecomplexityofthetextsanddiscoursewithfocuson:
Evidenceofthe
Shiftsandthe
Standards
Student
engagement
Questions
attendingto
specificwordsand
sentenceswithin
thetext
Questions
returningstudent
tothetextto
build
understanding
Studentcitation
ofspecific
evidencefrom
texttosupport
theirpositions
Whataresome
opportunitiesfor
improvement?