data service center school choice application data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as...

21
1 Data Service Center School Choice Application Data for the 2016/2017 School Year These data show the number of applications submitted for the 2016/2017 school year. In other words, these applications were submitted starting in November 2015 for the following school year. Please note that a parent can (and typically does) submit multiple applications for one child. The application is structured so that if a parents applies to a school district that has multiple schools, that parent may select their 1 st , 2 nd and 3 rd choice. When applying to a charter school or a district with just one school at that grade level, they would create one application with only a first choice. These data include choice applications to all DE LEAs except Indian River, Smyrna, Lake Forest, Cape Henlopen, Laurel, Sussex Tech, Positive Outcomes and Thomas Edison Charter and those LEAs who accepted paper choice applications, but chose not to enter them into the DSC system. The table below depicts the number of choice application submitted by residents of each school district. For example, even though Smyrna school district does not utilize the DSC system, it still had 708 applications filed by Smyrna residents to schools that did utilize the online choice portal. (Further interpretation and guidance can be found on page 5). In summary, the data listed below indicates the number of applications submitted NOT the number of residents applying for choice. 24,957 applications were submitted (includes KN and standard applications) 18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District % of all applications Number of applications Christina 38.03% 9492 Red Clay Consolidated 21.52% 5370 Colonial 13.09% 3267 Appoquinimink 7.99% 1995 Brandywine 6.80% 1697 Capital 4.18% 1043 Smyrna 2.84% 708 Caesar Rodney 1.71% 427 Lake Forest 1.03% 258 Indian River 0.68% 170 Milford 0.65% 161 Cape Henlopen 0.56% 139 Seaford 0.54% 136 Laurel 0.18% 46 Woodbridge 0.16% 41 Delmar 0.02% 6

Upload: others

Post on 12-Apr-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

1

Data Service Center School Choice Application Data for the 2016/2017 School Year

These data show the number of applications submitted for the 2016/2017 school year. In other words, these applications were submitted starting in

November 2015 for the following school year. Please note that a parent can (and typically does) submit multiple applications for one child. The application is

structured so that if a parents applies to a school district that has multiple schools, that parent may select their 1st, 2nd and 3rd choice. When applying to a

charter school or a district with just one school at that grade level, they would create one application with only a first choice. These data include choice

applications to all DE LEAs except Indian River, Smyrna, Lake Forest, Cape Henlopen, Laurel, Sussex Tech, Positive Outcomes and Thomas Edison Charter and

those LEAs who accepted paper choice applications, but chose not to enter them into the DSC system. The table below depicts the number of choice

application submitted by residents of each school district. For example, even though Smyrna school district does not utilize the DSC system, it still had 708

applications filed by Smyrna residents to schools that did utilize the online choice portal. (Further interpretation and guidance can be found on page 5). In

summary, the data listed below indicates the number of applications submitted NOT the number of residents applying for choice.

24,957 applications were submitted (includes KN and standard applications)

18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district

By Resident/Feeder District:

District % of all applications Number of applications

Christina 38.03% 9492

Red Clay Consolidated 21.52% 5370

Colonial 13.09% 3267

Appoquinimink 7.99% 1995

Brandywine 6.80% 1697

Capital 4.18% 1043

Smyrna 2.84% 708

Caesar Rodney 1.71% 427

Lake Forest 1.03% 258

Indian River 0.68% 170

Milford 0.65% 161

Cape Henlopen 0.56% 139

Seaford 0.54% 136

Laurel 0.18% 46

Woodbridge 0.16% 41

Delmar 0.02% 6

Page 2: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

2

By Resident County:

County % of all applications Number of applications

New Castle 87.43% 21821

Kent 9.76% 2436

Sussex 2.80% 700

Page 3: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

3

Page 4: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

4

Page 5: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

5

Choice Applications by Feeder (Resident District)

The following 16 pages (pages 6 to 21) depict the number of of choice applications submitted to school districts and

charters that utilized the Data Service Center online system for the 2016-2017 school year. The choice applications are

organized with a page illustrating each of the districts of residence.

As a reminder, all Delaware districts and charters utilized the DSC online choice portal for the 2016-2017 school year

except for Indian River, Smyrna, Lake Forest, Cape Henlopen, Laurel, Sussex Tech, Positive Outcomes and Thomas Edison

Charter. For this reason, no counts are depicted for residents who applied to these schools. Note that these schools are

not available in the listing of schools on the right-hand side of each chart.

A page is devoted to each of the 16 traditional public school districts in Delaware. Each page shows the number of

applications submitted by residents of that particular school district. Additionally, the charts depict what school those

residents applied to. Please note that these charts indicate the total number of applications submitted. Residents may

apply to more than one school by submitting multiple applications. Therefore, it is important to remember that these

counts refer to the number of applications submitted and not the number of residents submitting applications.

As an example, please look at page 6. This page depicts the choice applications submitted via the DSC system by residents

of Appoquinimink School District. The pink box depicts the 949 choice applications submitted by Appoquinimink residents

who wished to choice into MOT charter school. The orange box depicts the 510 Appoquinimink residents who wished to

choice into another Appoquinimink school (through intradistrict choice). One resident who submitted a choice application

for both MOT Charter and another Appoquinimink school would account for one application in the pink box and one

application in the orange box.

Page 6: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

6

Page 7: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

7

Page 8: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

8

Page 9: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

9

Page 10: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

10

Page 11: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

11

Page 12: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

12

Page 13: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

13

Page 14: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

14

Page 15: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

15

Page 16: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

16

Page 17: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

17

Page 18: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

18

Page 19: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

19

Page 20: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

20

Page 21: Data Service Center School Choice Application Data …...18,856 (75.6%) were identified as “Complete” by the receiving school or district By Resident/Feeder District: District

21