Towards a fundamental safe theory of composite Higgs and Dark Matter

Giacomo Cacciapaglia∗ and Shahram Vatani†Université de Lyon, F-69622 Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1,

Villeurbanne CNRS/IN2P3, UMR5822, Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon.

Teng Ma‡CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics,

Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.

Yongcheng Wu§Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Physics, Carleton University,

1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.

We present a novel paradigm that allows to define a composite theory at the EW scale that iswell defined all the way up to any energy by means of safety in the UV. The theory flows froma complete UV fixed point to an IR fixed point for the strong dynamics (which gives the desiredwalking) before generating a mass gap at the TeV scale. The model includes a composite Higgs,Dark Matter and partial compositeness for all SM fermions.

The ultra-violet (UV) behaviour is crucial for a quan-tum field theory (QFT) to be predictive and fundamentalup to high scales [1, 2]. The presence of fixed points inthe renormalisation group evolution of gauge and non-gauge couplings plays a central role in this. The primeexample is Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD), whichfeatures a free fixed point where the gauge coupling van-ishes in the UV [3, 4]. The possible existence of an in-teracting fixed point has been first proposed by S. Wein-berg in the context of quantum gravity [5], but prema-turely discarded for renormalisable QFTs. Until, F. San-nino and D. Litim [6] found a first example of perturba-tive interacting UV fixed point in a theory with scalarsand gauge-Yukawa couplings. Pure gauge theories withfermions have been obtained by employing resummationtechniques for large number of fermionic flavours [7–9].Recent progress can be found in Refs [10–13].

The least attractive feature of this class of asymptoti-cally safe theories is the presence of a large multiplicityof fermion matter fields, as it can be seen in the attemptsto build a safe extension of the Standard Model [16].Whilst this possibility is not ruled out experimentally,postulating the presence of tens of new massive fermionsat the multi-TeV scale for the sole purpose of changingthe UV behaviour of the theory contradicts the princi-ple of minimality 1. In this letter we want to point out aclass of theories where the presence of large multiplicitiesof heavy fermions is required for another crucial reason:the generation of masses for all Standard Model fermionsin models of composite Higgs with partial compositeness.In these models, minimality requires that there exists one

∗ g.cacciapaglia@ipnl.in2p3.fr† shahram.vatani@ens-lyon.fr‡ mat@itp.ac.cn§ ycwu@physics.carleton.ca1 Quantum gravity effects may also be able to drive the StandardModel interactions to a safe UV, see for instance Ref. [17].

composite operator for each chiral fermionic field in theStandard Model. To generate such a spectrum of opera-tors, an underlying theory needs to contain a large num-ber of preons, the fundamental degrees of freedom thatconstitute the composite objects. Furthermore, consid-erations related to the hierarchy problem lead to postu-lating fermionic preons.

A classification of underlying theories based on gauge-fermion interactions can be found in Ref. [18]. The mainconstraint on this model building effort is precisely therequirement that the theory shall remain confining atlow energies [19]. This limits the number of underlyingfermions to the ones responsible for giving mass to thetop quark only. This problem is absent in theories withscalar fields [20] at the price of reintroducing the hierar-chy problem related to elementary scalar masses. In anycase, these theories remain underlying descriptions of thecomposite Higgs dynamics of top partial compositeness,but far from being true UV completions. In fact, theorigin of the light fermion masses as well as the sourcefor the couplings generating the partial compositeness re-main absent. Our goal is therefore to take a decisive steptowards addressing these issues and being able to con-struct a genuine UV complete theory that can be trustedat arbitrarily high energies, at least up to the Planckscale. In this perspective, providing a Dark Matter can-didate becomes a key ingredient.

In this letter we present a new paradigm that allows todefine composite Higgs models with underlying fermionsup to arbitrary high energies. The large number offermions needed to give mass to all standard quarks andleptons drives the theory to a complete UV interactingfixed point. The fermions associated with the two lightgenerations are supposed to have a large mass, thus ex-plaining the lightness compared to the electroweak scale.Once integrated out, the remaining degrees of freedomdrive the confining gauge interaction towards an Infra-Red (IR) fixed point [21]. The resulting conformal win-

arX

iv:1

812.

0400

5v1

[he

p-ph

] 1

0 D

ec 2

018

2

ψ irrep coset pNGBs pNGB EW charges models GHC Lattice resultspseudo-real SU(4)/Sp(4) 5 2±1/2 ⊕ 10 M8-M9 Sp(4), SO(11) Sp(4)

real SU(5)/SO(5) 14 2±1/2 ⊕ 3±1 ⊕ 30 ⊕ 10 M1-M7 SU(4), Sp(4), SO(7), SO(9), SO(10) SU(4), Sp(4)complex SU(4)2/SU(4) 15 2× 2±1/2 ⊕ 30 M10-M12 SO(10), SU(4), SU(5) SU(3), SU(4)

⊕1±1 ⊕ 2× 10 MV SU(3)

TABLE I. Minimal cosets with a pNGB Higgs doublet arising from an underlying gauge-fermion theory. The fourth columnshows the SU(2)L irrep, with the hypercharge as subscript. The last three columns shows some properties of the explicit models,with the nomenclature M1-M12 from Ref. [14], and MV being the model from Ref. [15].

dow, similar in nature to walking Technicolor [22, 23], al-lows to further split the scale of the heavy fermions whereflavour effects also arise, from the condensation and elec-troweak scales. The exit from the IR fixed point can bedriven by integrating out a subset of the remaining lightfermions, leaving one of the models of Ref. [18] at lowscale. In this framework, fundamental scalar fields canalso be added in a natural way, as long as their massesare close to the mass of the heaviest fermions [24]. ADark Matter candidate can be easily included in thisclass of theories [25–27]. The new scenario we discusshere, therefore, allows to define composite models thatcan be as predictive as supersymmetric extensions of theStandard Model.

The letter is organised as follows: after summarisingin Section I the guiding principles behind the construc-tion of underlying theories for composite Higgs, in Sec-tion II we show results for one specific example that fea-tures a Dark Matter candidate. In Section III we presentthe phenomenology of the Dark Matter candidate, whichproves that the model is feasible, before offering our con-clusions.

I. CHOOSING THE MODEL

To define an underlying theory for composite Higgsmodels, we need to specify a confining hyper-colour (HC)gauge symmetry, GHC, and the irreducible representation(irrep) of the underlying fermions, ψi. Furthermore, theelectroweak (EW) quantum numbers of the ψi shouldbe suitably chosen such that a Higgs doublet arises asa pseudo-Nambu Goldstone boson (pNGB) after confine-ment and chiral symmetry breaking. The partial compos-iteness paradigm imposes a strong additional constraint:the presence of spin-1/2 bound states that mix with thestandard fermions.

Bound states of three ψ’s are possible for the funda-mental irrep of GHC = SU(3) [15], as long as some ofthe fermions also carry QCD charges in addition to theEW ones. Another possibility, proposed in Ref. [18], isto sequester QCD charges to a second class of under-lying fermions, χj , transforming under a different irrepof GHC. The benefit of this choice is that the breakingof the EW symmetry via vacuum misalignment in theψ-sector is decoupled from QCD, which should not bebroken. Furthermore, the spin-1/2 bound states that en-

ter partial compositeness arise as chimera baryons [28]made of both species of fermions, in the two alternativeforms

B = 〈ψψχ〉 or 〈ψχχ〉 . (1)

For each HC gauge group, the multiplicity of fermions,and their irreps, are limited by the requirement that thetheory remains asymptotically free, i.e. it confines at lowenergy, and outside the IR conformal window [29, 30], i.e.a mass gap is generated. Furthermore, the minimal num-ber of ψ’s is given by the requirement of having a Higgsdoublet in the coset, as listed in Table I, while the mini-mal χ sector needs to contain a QCD colour triplet andan anti-triplet in order to generate - at least - the topmass. This leaves only 12 feasible models [19] with mini-mal Higgs cosets, which we denote M1 to M12, followingRef. [14].

To define a genuine UV completion for these models,the issue of Dark Matter cannot be avoided. The simplestpossibility is that one of the additional pNGBs may bestable. The minimal case is offered by the SU(4)2/SU(4)cosets [25, 31]. As it was shown in Ref. [31], in the EWsector there is a unique Z2 parity that is conserved by thefermion condensate (if custodial symmetry is preserved)and by the EW gauging, as well as being anomaly free: itis defined in terms of charge conjugation in the ψ sectorplus a flavour rotation in the SU(4) space. If the topcouplings also respect this parity, the pNGB spectrumwill contain several odd scalars, in particular a doubletand a triplet of SU(2)L plus a neutral and a chargedsinglet. Such states mix, and the lightest neutral oneplays the role of Dark Mater candidate (see Ref. [31] formore details on the pNGB structure).

To extend the Dark Z2 parity in the case of partialcompositeness, we need to make sure that the compos-ite operator B that mixes with the top has well-definedtransformation properties and contains an even statewith the same quantum numbers as the top quark fields.As the Dark parity contains charge conjugation in theψ-sector (but not χ), it is crucial that the bound statecontains two ψ’s: this simple fact rules out the case withHC-charged scalars of Ref. [20]. Furthermore, the ψ-bilinear in B needs to be in a real irrep of GHC (rulingout M12 and MV, see Table I) and needs to contain bothchiralities (ruling out M11). We are therefore left withthe model M10, based on SO(10)HC, with the ψ in the

3

spinorial irrep and the χ in the fundamental. There areseveral choices for the wave function of the compositeoperators generating top partners that preserves the Z2

symmetry in this model. One of them is

Bql = 〈(ψlΓψcr)χcr〉 Btr = 〈(ψlΓψcr)χl〉, (2)

where the subscript l, r refer to the chirality, c indicatesthe charge conjugate and the brackets means Lorentzscalar. Both top partners will, therefore, transform asa bi-fundamental of SU(4) × SU(4), which decomposesinto a singlet and an adjoint of the unbroken SU(4).

We will now study how the model M10 can be UVcompleted to an asymptotically safe theory.

II. A FUNDAMENTAL THEORY WITH UVSAFETY

SO(10)HC SU(3)c SU(2)L U(1)Y massψL 16 1 2 0

∼ 0ψu,dR 16 1 1 ±1/2χ3u 10 3 1 2/3χ3d 10

3 1 −1/3 ∼ ΛHCχ3l 1 1 −1

χ1,2u

103 1 2/3

ΛFl � ΛHCχ1,2d 3 1 −1/3

χ1,2l 1 1 −1

TABLE II. Model M10 - all fermions are Dirac spinors.

The model M10 consists of 4 EW-charged ψ’s and aQCD-colour triplet of χ’s, as shown in the upper blockof Table II. These states characterise the composite statesbelow the condensation scale ΛHC, including the Higgs,Dark Matter and the top partners.

To complete the model, we will extend it by adding oneappropriate χ for each standard fermion that acquiresmass via the Higgs mechanism, as shown in Table II.We add the partners for the bottom quark and tau lep-ton at a scale close to ΛHC, i.e. 4 additional χ-flavours.This is enough to push the theory into the conformalwindow: right above the condensation scale, therefore,the strong sector flows into a conformal phase where thegauge coupling remains strong and slowly walking. Thisphase may ensure that the operators that mix to the lightgenerations acquire a largish anomalous dimension thatallows to sufficiently decouple the scale where they areintroduced. The χ fermions associated to the light gen-erations are, in fact, introduced at a scale ΛFl � ΛHC,where flavour effects are also generated. Above ΛFl, thenumber of fermions is such that the running of all gaugecouplings are not asymptotically free any more. We willfirst study how the theory may flow to a UV safe fixedpoint.

Following Ref. [32], for each gauge group we define anormalised coupling that takes into account the multi-

plicity of fermions f charged under it:

Ki ≡ NiTiαiπ

=αiπ

∑f

nfT (rf ) ; (3)

with i = 1, 2, 3, 10 labelling the 4 gauge groups, and we fixthe normalisation with the fundamental irreps, i.e. T1 =T10 = 1 and T2 = T3 = 1/2 (for U(1), replace T (rf ) →Y 2f ). The multiplicities Ni, different for each group, allow

us to define a large “Nf ” counting that we will use inthe expansion and resummation. We will assume thatformally they are all of the same order. For the UV-complete M10, we find:

N1 = 93 , N2 = 22 , N3 = 66 , N10 = 25 . (4)

The resummed evolution equations read

∂ lnKi

∂ lnµ≡ βi(Ki) =

2Ki

3

[1 +

∑n

1

Nnf

B(n)i

], (5)

with the first-order term equal to

B(1)i

Nf=

1

Ni

ci,iH1(Ki) +∑j 6=i

ci,jF1(Kj)

. (6)

(For the i = 1, the function H1(K1) should be replacedby F1(K1)). The coefficients read:

c1,1 = 19273348 , c1,2 = 3

44 , c1,3 = 21199 , c1,10 = 15 ;

c2,1 = 1186 , c2,2 = 3

2 , c2,3 = 211 , c2,10 = 9

5 ;c3,1 = 211

1116 , c3,2 = 944 , c3,3 = 8

3 , c3,10 = 545 ;

c10,1 = 331 , c10,2 = 3

11 , c10,3 = 811 , c10,10 = 9

2 .

(7)

The functions H1 and F1 are defined in Ref. [11]. Forour discussion, the key property is that the two functionshave a pole at negative values for K = 3 and K = 15/2respectively, while the resummation fails for coupling val-ues above the pole. This feature, thus, acts as a barrierfor the evolution of the respective coupling towards theUV. In other words, if the value of the coupling at thethreshold ΛFl is below the pole, the evolution towardsthe UV will stop at that value where the beta functionvanishes and the theory approaches a fixed point. Thecondition for the model to have a UV safe fixed point forall gauge couplings is that their value is below the pole,Ki < 3 for i 6= 1 and K1 < 15/2. Numerically, in M10this implies:

α1(ΛFl) . 0.25 , α2(ΛFl) . 0.86 ,

α3(ΛFl) . 0.28 , α10(ΛFl) . 0.38 . (8)

Satisfying the above constraints will provide an upperbound on ΛFl due to the fact that some of the gaugecouplings increase towards the UV above ΛHC. This isin particular true for the U(1) gauge coupling. On theother hand, an indirect lower bound derives from flavourphysics, which gives Λ & 105 TeV for generic flavour vi-olating effects.

4

Strong coupling regime

2

4

6

8

10

α1

α2

α3

α10

2 4 6 8 10 120.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

t = Log10 (μ/GeV)

α

FIG. 1. Renormalisation group running of the gauge couplings αi. The dashed lines show the effect of the large-Nf resummationabove ΛFl = 108.5 GeV. The upper panel shows a cartoon of the running at strong coupling. Note that α2 also runs towardsthe UV fixed point α2 = 0.86 (not shown in the plot).

In Fig. 1 we show the running of the 4 gauge couplingsabove the EW scale for the model in Table II and as-suming ΛHC = 10 TeV. In this example, it is the QCDcoupling α3 that first crosses the upper limit in Eq. (8)(shown by the thin horizontal lines) at 109 GeV, thusgiving an upper limit to the value of ΛFl. In dashes lineswe show how the running changes when we add the lightgeneration fermions at ΛFl = 108.5 GeV: we see that allcouplings run to the fixed UV fixed point (for SU(2) it isnot shown in the plot). The behaviour of α3 after U(1)saturates the asymptotic value is a numerical artefact,nevertheless it shows the impact of the U(1) running onthe other gauge couplings as a large F1(α1) will affect allthe β-functions in Eq. (6). This example illustrates thata completely UV-safe composite Higgs and Dark Mattermodel with partial compositeness is indeed feasible.

In the upper panel we illustrate the running of α10

in the strong coupling regime, which features a walkingregion between 104 and 107 GeV. This part of the plot,being non-perturbative, can only be confirmed by latticecalculations along the lines of Refs [28, 33–35].

III. DARK MATTER PHENOMENOLOGY

In this model, the pNGBs that are odd under the DarkMatter parity are a triplet of SU(2)L, the second Higgsdoublet and a charged and neutral singlet (forming atriplet of the custodial SU(2)R symmetry). Some of thecomposite fermions and vector mesons are also odd underthe Dark parity. However, since the pNGB potential isgenerated at loop order, it is natural to expect that thepNGBs are lighter than other resonances. Thus, it is thelightest odd pNGB that plays the role of Dark Mattercandidate [31].

The mass mixing is determined by the pNGB poten-

tial, which is generated by the EW gauge interactions,by a mass of the underlying fermions ψ, and by the par-tial compositeness couplings. The first two contributionshave already been computed in Ref. [31]. Since the UVcompletion is fermionic, the Weinberg sum rules are auto-matically satisfied and the Higgs potential from the EWgauge sector is finite. In the top sector, we impose themaximal symmetry [39] in order to keep Higgs potentialfrom top loops finite and calculable.

The nature of the lightest neutral stable scalar cru-cially depends on the mass difference between the twoψ’s, i.e. δ ≡ (mψL

−mψR)/(mψL

+ mψR). For δ < 0, it

mostly coincides with the SU(2)L triplet, while for δ > 0it has maximal overlap with the singlets. For δ ∼ 0,maximal mixing with the doublet is active. This mix-ing pattern determines the annihilation rates of the DarkMatter candidate, which is dominated by the final statesin two EW gauge bosons and two tops. The annihilationcross section is thus larger for δ < 0, leading to largerDark Matter masses.

To study a concrete example, we computed the top andgauge boson loop potential, and limited the parameterspace by fixing the value of the top (173 GeV) and Higgs(125 GeV) masses at the minimum of the potential. Wethen scanned the remaining parameter space and com-puted relic abundance and spin-independent cross sec-tion off nuclei by using the micrOMEGAs [40] package. InFig. 2 we show the results of our scan in the plane ofthe Dark Matter mass versus the cross section rescaledby the actual relic abundance. In this way, all points canbe compared to the Direct Detection exclusion, shown bythe solid black, blue and red lines. Points that saturatethe relic abundance lie on the green line. We see thatthe model can explain the Dark Matter abundance with-out being excluded for masses ranging from few hundredGeV (for δ > 0) to 1.5 ∼ 2 TeV (for δ < 0). We remark

5

FIG. 2. Direct detection constraints [36–38] for δ = 0.5 (left) and δ = −0.5 (right). The colour encodes the relic density foreach parameter points. The green curve saturates the measured relic density value, with points having warmer colour excludedby over-density.

that those masses have reasonable values compared tothe typical compositeness scale at the TeV.

IV. CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

We have presented a new paradigm that allows to de-fine composite Higgs models with partial compositenessfor the top quark up to arbitrarily high scales. This al-lows for the first time to endow composite models withpredictivity power. Based on gauge-fermion underlyingdescription of the low energy physics, we use the need fora large multiplicity of fermions, related to the large num-ber of fermions and generations in the standard model,to predict the presence of UV safe fixed points for thecomplete theory.

We apply this paradigm to a model that also features acomposite scalar Dark Matter candidate. We show thatthe gauge couplings, which include the coupling of theconfining SO(10)HC group, can develop a UV interactingfixed points while also allowing for an IR conformal win-dow and a sufficient hierarchy between the scale of flavourphysics generation and the EW scale. Furthermore, theresulting unique model predicts a Dark Matter candidatein a consistent mass ballpark, which can also saturate therelic abundance while evading direct detection bounds.

While opening a very promising road, this model isstill not a truly UV completion, as it does not include adynamical origin for the couplings between the standardfermions and the strong sector. Such four-fermion in-teractions may be generated by scalar mediators without

loosing naturalness, as long as the scalar masses are closeto the heaviest fermion masses in the theory. However,it has been observed that there is a tension between therunning of scalar quartics and U(1) gauge couplings [11].A possible solution to this issue is to unify the U(1) withany other gauge group in a non-abelian envelope [41].This also leaves open the possibility that the four-fermioninteractions are generated by vector mediators, à la Ex-tended Technicolor. We leave the investigation of thispoint for further work.

The results presented in this letter are a stepping stonetowards complete composite Higgs models, where the ori-gin of the standard fermion masses can be finally ad-dressed. Some crucial ingredients, like the presence of anIR window where large anomalous dimensions are gener-ated, need input from lattice calculations, possible as adetailed underlying model is on the table. The colliderphenomenology of composite models is also affected, asnon-minimal cosets are the norm in this scenario, thuspredicting additional charged and neutral light scalarsthat can be searched for at the LHC.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Y.Wu is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engi-neering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). T.M. issupported in part by project Y6Y2581B11 supported by2016 National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Tal-ents. G.C. and S.V. acknowledge partial support fromthe China-France LIA FCPPL and the Labex Lyon In-stitute of the Origins - LIO.

[1] K. G. Wilson, “Renormalization group and criticalphenomena. 1. Renormalization group and the Kadanoffscaling picture,”Phys. Rev. B4 (1971) 3174–3183.

[2] K. G. Wilson, “Renormalization group and criticalphenomena. 2. Phase space cell analysis of criticalbehavior,”Phys. Rev. B4 (1971) 3184–3205.

6

[3] D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Ultraviolet Behavior ofNonabelian Gauge Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973)1343–1346.

[4] H. D. Politzer, “Reliable Perturbative Results for StrongInteractions?,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1346–1349.

[5] S. Weinberg, “Ultraviolet divergences in quantumtheories of gravitation,” in General Relativity: AnEinstein Centenary Survey, pp. 790–831. 1980.

[6] D. F. Litim and F. Sannino, “Asymptotic safetyguaranteed,”JHEP 12 (2014) 178, [1406.2337].

[7] D. Espriu, A. Palanques-Mestre, P. Pascual andR. Tarrach, “The γ Function in the 1/Nf Expansion,”Z.Phys. C13 (1982) 153.

[8] A. Palanques-Mestre and P. Pascual, “The 1/Nf

Expansion of the γ and Beta Functions inQED,”Commun. Math. Phys. 95 (1984) 277.

[9] J. A. Gracey, “The QCD Beta function atO(1/N(f)),”Phys. Lett. B373 (1996) 178–184,[hep-ph/9602214].

[10] K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, “Gauge contribution tothe 1/Nf expansion of the Yukawa coupling betafunction,”JHEP 04 (2018) 027, [1712.06859].

[11] O. Antipin, N. A. Dondi, F. Sannino, A. E. Thomsenand Z.-W. Wang, “Gauge-Yukawa theories: Betafunctions at large Nf ,”Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 016003,[1803.09770].

[12] T. Alanne and S. Blasi, “The β-function for Yukawatheory at large Nf ,”JHEP 08 (2018) 081, [1806.06954].

[13] T. Alanne and S. Blasi, “The abelian gauge-Yukawaβ-functions at large Nf ,” 1808.03252.

[14] A. Belyaev, G. Cacciapaglia, H. Cai, G. Ferretti,T. Flacke, A. Parolini et al., “Di-boson signatures asStandard Candles for Partial Compositeness,”JHEP 01(2017) 094, [1610.06591].

[15] L. Vecchi, “A dangerous irrelevant UV-completion of thecomposite Higgs,”JHEP 02 (2017) 094, [1506.00623].

[16] G. M. Pelaggi, A. D. Plascencia, A. Salvio, F. Sannino,J. Smirnov and A. Strumia, “Asymptotically SafeStandard Model Extensions?,”Phys. Rev. D97 (2018)095013, [1708.00437].

[17] A. Eichhorn, “An asymptotically safe guide to quantumgravity and matter,” 1810.07615.

[18] G. Ferretti and D. Karateev, “Fermionic UVcompletions of Composite Higgs models,”JHEP 03(2014) 077, [1312.5330].

[19] G. Ferretti, “Gauge theories of Partial Compositeness:Scenarios for Run-II of the LHC,”JHEP 06 (2016) 107,[1604.06467].

[20] F. Sannino, A. Strumia, A. Tesi and E. Vigiani,“Fundamental partial compositeness,”JHEP 11 (2016)029, [1607.01659].

[21] T. Banks and A. Zaks, “On the Phase Structure ofVector-Like Gauge Theories with MasslessFermions,”Nucl. Phys. B196 (1982) 189–204.

[22] B. Holdom, “Raising the Sideways Scale,”Phys. Rev.D24 (1981) 1441.

[23] K. Yamawaki, M. Bando and K.-i. Matumoto, “ScaleInvariant Technicolor Model and a Technidilaton,”Phys.Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 1335.

[24] G. M. Pelaggi, F. Sannino, A. Strumia and E. Vigiani,“Naturalness of asymptotically safe Higgs,”Front.inPhys. 5 (2017) 49, [1701.01453].

[25] Y. Wu, T. Ma, B. Zhang and G. Cacciapaglia,“Composite Dark Matter and Higgs,”JHEP 11 (2017)058, [1703.06903].

[26] G. Ballesteros, A. Carmona and M. Chala, “ExceptionalComposite Dark Matter,”Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 468,[1704.07388].

[27] R. Balkin, M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni and A. Weiler,“Charged Composite Scalar Dark Matter,”JHEP 11(2017) 094, [1707.07685].

[28] V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, M. Golterman, D. C. Hackett,W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil et al., “Spectroscopy of SU(4)composite Higgs theory with two distinct fermionrepresentations,”Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 074505,[1710.00806].

[29] D. D. Dietrich and F. Sannino, “Conformal window ofSU(N) gauge theories with fermions in higherdimensional representations,”Phys. Rev. D75 (2007)085018, [hep-ph/0611341].

[30] F. Sannino, “Conformal Windows of SP(2N) and SO(N)Gauge Theories,”Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 096007,[0902.3494].

[31] T. Ma and G. Cacciapaglia, “Fundamental Composite2HDM: SU(N) with 4 flavours,”JHEP 03 (2016) 211,[1508.07014].

[32] O. Antipin and F. Sannino, “Conformal Window 2.0:The large Nf safe story,”Phys. Rev. D97 (2018)116007, [1709.02354].

[33] E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin,B. Lucini, M. Piai et al., “Sp(4) gauge theory on thelattice: towards SU(4)/Sp(4) composite Higgs (andbeyond),”JHEP 03 (2018) 185, [1712.04220].

[34] J.-W. Lee, Bennett, D. K. Hong, C. J. D. Lin,B. Lucini, M. Piai et al., “Progress in the latticesimulations of Sp(2N) gauge theories,”PoSLATTICE2018 (2018) 192, [1811.00276].

[35] O. Witzel, A. Hasenfratz and C. Rebbi, “CompositeHiggs from mass-split models,” in 13th Conference onthe Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics(CIPANP 2018) Palm Springs, California, USA, May29-June 3, 2018, 2018. 1810.01850.

[36] PandaX-II collaboration, X. Cui et al., “Dark MatterResults From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-IIExperiment,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181302,[1708.06917].

[37] LUX collaboration, D. S. Akerib et al., “Limits onspin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtainedfrom the complete LUX exposure,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(2017) 251302, [1705.03380].

[38] XENON collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “Dark MatterSearch Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure ofXENON1T,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302,[1805.12562].

[39] C. Csaki, T. Ma and J. Shu, “Maximally SymmetricComposite Higgs Models,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017)131803, [1702.00405].

[40] G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov,“micrOMEGAs3: A program for calculating darkmatter observables,”Comput. Phys. Commun. 185(2014) 960–985, [1305.0237].

[41] E. Molinaro, F. Sannino and Z. W. Wang, “SafePati-Salam,” 1807.03669.