1

Daniel Sheehan’s

New Paradigm Institute

Defining and Exploring Our Worldviews

The Implications of Extraterrestrial Consciousness

Embracing the Arrival of the COSMIC HUMAN

2

The Octave of Worldviews and the Philosophical, Theoretical

and Public Policy Implications of Extraterrestrial Contact

Short Summary for This Document

Octave of Worldviews – Daniel Sheehan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MLsQQxc-n0

Brief Biography – Daniel Sheehan

Daniel P. Sheehan is a Harvard College-trained American Government & Foreign Policy

Scholar, a Harvard Law School-trained Constitutional Trial Attorney and Appellate Attorney

and a Harvard Divinity School-trained expert in the field of Comparative Social Ethics &

Alternative Worldviews.

Over the last forty years, as an attorney, public speaker and university educator, Mr. Sheehan

has helped to expose injustice, protect fundamental rights and elucidate a compelling vision

for the future for our human family in many fields.

In no field has his work in these three areas been more important or more appreciated than in

the controversial …yet highly-important…field of Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence and its

related field of the UFO Phenomenon.

Attorney Sheehan’s passion and dedication to this specific issue…despite all of the “raised

eyebrows” that his interest in this field has occasioned on the part of his professional

colleagues in both the legal field and his role as a university educator…have placed Daniel

Sheehan at the forefront of some of the most important legal studies and forums in this unique

and important field of human endeavor.

Mr. Sheehan is a forty-five-year member of the State and Federal Bar Associations of the

State of New York and of the District of Columbia and he has been admitted to practice

before the Courts of 28 States.

Source: Contact in the Desert, http://contactinthedesert.com/danielsheehan

Key Excerpt from Daniel Sheehan’s Biography from His Website

3

Dan also served as Legal Counsel to Dr. John Mack, the Chair of the Department of Clinical

Psychology at Harvard Medical School in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Dr. Mack was a

Pulitzer-Prize winning biographer who, utilizing the scientific methods of medical

psychology, conducted extensive research into the phenomenon of alien abduction. In 1994,

the Dean of The Harvard Medical School called Dr. Mack before a special hand-picked

Faculty Committee and ordered Dr. Mack to "defend" his publication of his book Abduction:

Human Encounters with Aliens. A clear violation of his free speech rights and his status as a

long-tenured Professor at harvard University—as well as a highly-respected clinician—Dan

suucessfully represented Dr. Mack before this committee, and secured his right to academic

freedom.

Dan's work for - and the, later, with - Dr. Mack was not the first time Dan had come into

contact with the issue of the potential of Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence. In 1977, Dan served as

a "Special Counsel" to the United States Library of Congress' investigation into the existence

of extraterrestrial intelligence that had been expressly requested by then President Jimmy

Carter. Following this work Dan was invited to present a THree-hour, closed-door seminar on

the Theological Implications of Our Contact With Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence to top 50

scientists assigned to The SETI Project (the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) at

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Given these experiences, Dan was in a unique position to

handle legal issues surrounding the extraterrestrial intelligence debate.

In 2001, Dan was invited to serve as General Counsel to The Disclosure Project, which

coordinated the sworn testimony—before staff members of the United States Congress—by

former U.S. Military Officers, Federal Aviation Administration officials, and NASA

employees attesting to their own direct personal knowledge of Government information

confirming the UFO phenomenon and the belief on the part of important agencies of our

government in the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence. Dan also served as General

Counsel to the Institute for Cooperation in Space, a U.S. citizens group dedicated to banning

space-based weapons and the development of any weapons intended for offensive use against

potential extraterrestrial civilizations. Dan has, since that time, been invited, on numerous

occasions, a speak on "The Philosophical and Theological Implications of the Human

Discovery of Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence at the International UFO Congress and at The

Mutual UFO Network.

More recently, Dan's work has focused on identifying and cultivating non-dialectical,

cooperative models for change. After arriving in Californai, Dan served as the Director of the

New Paradigm Project at Mikhail Gorbachev's State of the World Forum. There he joined

world leaders in examining the obstacles to a new era of sustainable economic and social

organization and development. Through the Romero Institute, Dan is currently working to

establish the New Paradigm Academy, a year-long program that will give young leaders of

the Millennial Generation the tools they need to effectively address global challenges. The

New paradigm Academy will house The Worldview Institute, a think-tank that will utilize an

understanding of human worldviews to apply to the resolution of global political and policy

problems.

4

Source: Daniel Sheehan Biography, http://danielpsheehan.com/about/biography

Videos by Daniel Sheehan

On the New Paradigm Institute DANNY SHEEHAN - Kosta Makreas - Disclosure, ET & UFO Contact - New Paradigm

Institute, Dec 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwJF7oVfT5o

DANNY SHEEHAN - COSMIC HUMANITY - NEW PARADIGM INSTITUTE, Oct. 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_nIgWT8VIA

Daniel Sheehan: Understanding Worldview Paradigms, May 2009

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpkNuyHCbuA

On Extraterrestrial Issues

Daniel Sheehan on his UFO Thesis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjyRvuJGqVo

Daniel Sheehan at the Citizens’ Hearings on Disclosure:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qk4JbKpD5v4

Robert Perala interviews Daniel Sheehan for Contact in the Desert

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nH6jA3E1uKM

Daniel Sheehan on RT:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RDcppBr4rg

Daniel Sheehan’s Youtube Channel Daniel Sheehan’s youtube channel

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnrShHXCboC6fNzFFTOCCog/playlists

5

Full Text of the Entire Website - New Paradigm Institute

1. Thesis

It is the belief of the New Paradigm Institute that the Pathway to World Peace is the transition

of adherents to the eight specific Worldviews from their present, often unconscious,

adherence to the Ten Key Component Beliefs of the “Lower” Manifestation of a given

worldview to their voluntary ascendance to an adherence to the Ten Key Component Beliefs

of the “Higher” Manifestation of the same worldview – NOT along the coercive path of

attempting to convert adherents to one of the eight worldviews to a different worldview… let

alone to ONE single unitary “Worldview.”

Along this path, peaceful cooperation between and among adherents to the “Higher”

Manifestation of each of the Eight Alternative Worldviews can be effectuated, generating

institutions of cooperation and constructive living among communities and civilizations based

upon all eight different Worldviews.

It is the present belief of The New Paradigm Institute that this “pathway” exists through the

“gateway” of The Divine Feminine within the Mode of Spiritual Expression which is generic

to each of the eight individual Worldviews.

We find our planet confronted with the imminent consequences of massive Global Warming,

threatening, within our lifetimes, to inundate literally hundreds of millions of square miles of

our global coastlands with salt water, thereby destroying literally hundreds of trillions of

dollars of business and personal property and the homes of hundreds of millions of people,

thereby generating millions of human refugees. This phenomenon will also result in the

contamination of one-quarter of our planet’s available, potable drinking water that is

contained in coastal, underground fresh water aquifers. It will also melt (and thereby cast into

the sea) a second one-quarter of our planet’s presently-available, potable drinking water that

is presently contained in the one-mile-deep polar glacial ice-fields that extend one thousand

miles from the North and South Poles of our planet toward our Equator, thereby not only

eliminating a full one-third of the then-still-remaining potable drinking water available to our

human family but also dramatically altering the salination-level of our oceans, thereby,

altering the under-sea currents which directly effect our global climate-patterns as well as

destroying the plankton in the sea which constitute the very base of the sensitive “food-chain”

in our seas. On top of all this, there are dozens if not hundreds of nuclear power plants along

coastlines throughout the world that will be compromised as the sea level rises and storms

become more severe.

We also presently find our nation more deeply in debt to other nations – and to the

international banking industry – than at any time in our nation’s history …while, at the same

time, spending the largest annual military budgets in our nation’s history, with the lowest

percentage levels of income taxes being paid by the wealthiest 5% of our population and our

6

corporations since the point in time immediately preceding the 1929 collapse of our entire

global economy.

And, as a direct result of the foreign policies and military policies embraced and pursued by

the American Administrations of George H.W Bush and George W. Bush at the very end of

The Cold War, we find ourselves, as Americans, confronted by the most deeply-felt and

aggressively-demonstrated degree of “Anti-Americanism” on the part of members of the

radical Islamic Fundamentalist religious community in our entire history, manifesting itself in

the form of the generation of multiple Islamic “terrorist” cells presently organizing and

arming themselves to launch paramilitary attacks against our nation here at home and against

our nation’s citizens and “interests” not only throughout the entire Middle East but, indeed,

everywhere across on the entire planet. These “terrorist” threats, in turn, threaten the stability

and reliability of our supply of petroleum….which, amazingly perhaps, remains, even today,

our almost exclusive source of domestic energy.

So, one should be VERY interested in precisely what criteria we, as members of the American

Electorate, are going to employ in making our “choices” from among the various Official

Candidates for the House and Senate who will present themselves to us for each of the seats in

our Congress- and then precisely what criteria we will employ in choosing between the two

Final Candidates offered to us by the two Major Political parties to serve as our

representative?

However, the vast majority of the members of our American Electorate do not, to any

meaningful degree, understand the differences between the “Principles, Policies and

Programs” that are likely to be espoused by a Candidate whom one might accurately identify

as “Liberal” and the “Principles, Policies and Programs” that are likely to be espoused by a

Candidate whom one could accurately identify as “Conservative.” Nor do we really

understand the “differences” between the “Principles, Policies and Programs” that are likely

to be espoused by either of two such “Liberal” or “Conservative” Candidates and the

Principles, Policies and Programs that are likely to be espoused by a Candidate who adheres

to the more-recently-encountered “Neo-Conservative” Worldview …or of the “Progressive”

Worldview. Indeed, we aware totally unaware of the fact that there exist EIGHT entirely

distinct human “Worldviews” from amongst which one can logically choose in determining

what the “Principles, Policies and Programs” will be that one wishes to adopt, here in the 21st

Century, by means of which to address – and, hopefully, to remedy – these, and the other,

“national” … and “global”… public policy problems that will confront us over the next ten-

year period…and on through our 21st Century.

Very few Americans can tell which of these alternative “Worldviews” any particular

Candidate for public office actually espouses…IF ANY…in attempting to make our “choice”

between them – because virtually EVERY Official Candidate does the very best that he or she

can to convince the members of whichever audience he or she is speaking to at any given

moment that that Candidate adheres to that “Worldview”- that is the “Worldview” that is

shared by the majority of the members of THAT particular audience to which he or she is

speaking at the time. In short, virtually ALL Candidates for modern American political office

7

attempt to conceal his or her true “Worldview” from potential voters…or, even worse, he or

she insists that he or she does NOT even HAVE ANY specific “Worldview” at all….so as to

avoid being characterized as being “Ideological.” He or she always insists, instead, that he or

she will simply always simply “strive to do what is the ‘right’ thing to do in every situation.”

So, just “TRUST Me!” So, just decide whether you LIKE me…and whether you think that I

am LIKE you. Don’t worry about the fact that you often can’t tell WHAT my ‘position’ is ON

ANYTHING.”

Such a “reality” hardly recommends such a person to hold the most important political

positions in our community, a position in which he or she will be presented with repeated

situations in which he or she will have to make almost immediate – and potentially world-

altering – decisions. For, without such a “Worldview”, what criteria might such a person

resort to in making such important – and potentially world-altering – decisions?

To remedy this serious “public policy problem”: that so few of the members of our American

Electorate are adequately well-informed as to the precise nature – and “range” – of the

“Principles, Policies and Programs” from amongst which we must choose in order to

effectively address – and hopefully to solve – the many complex and serious problems that

confront us, as American voters, here at the beginning of our 21st Century.

Attorney Daniel Sheehan, a Harvard College-trained Political Scientist; a Harvard Law

School-trained Constitutional Legal Scholar and a Harvard Divinity School-trained

Comparative Social Ethicist, in the pages of the New Paradigm Institute, will set forth the

TEN “Key Categorical Beliefs” that go into making up each of the EIGHT Classic

“Worldviews” that compete daily, in our everyday world, for our conscious (but more-often

un-conscious) “loyalty.”

These are:

“Cosmology” (or theory as to the origins of and the presently-functioning operative physical

principles of our physical universe);

“Teleology” (or theory as to the “direction” [if any] in which our physical universe is

“unfolding” …and what its ultimate “destination” is);

“Ontology” (or theory as to the source and nature of “Consciousness” …and how it “evolved”

out of apparently “inert and impersonal matter”);

“Epistemology” (or theory as to what the “means” are which we have at our disposal, as

human beings, by means of which we can possibly come to “know” the “answer” to such

“cosmic” questions as these);

“Mode of Ethical Reasoning” (or methodology be means of which we determine what is

“Right” and what is “Wrong”, what is “Good” and what is “Bad” – or even what is “Better”

and what is “Best” from among apparent “options” presented to us by our universe);

8

“Philosophy” (which is generated by the composite of specific “Answers” that one determines

for oneself to these previous half-dozen “Cosmic Questions”);

“Political Philosophy” (or theory as to how we, as human beings, “ought” to go about

collectively deciding how to decide what the Principles, Policies and Programs are pursuant to

which we should make our collective “community” decisions governing how we live

together…and what the comparative degree of importance is that we should attribute to “The

Collective” or “The Individual”);

“Theory of Human Psychology” (or theory as to how our individual human Mind “works” in

conjunction with “The outside world.”);

“Mode of Spiritual Expression” (or “Theological” and/or “Meta-Physical” theory pursuant to

which we as human beings might comport ourselves “in the face of The Mystery” which is

The Universe and/or its “Source”); and

Its ultimate “Social Form” (or particular “form and structure” that Adherents to each such

“Worldview” believe ought to be put into place, through the “authority” of The Collective

Community, in which we, as human beings, should live together in our human communities.)

Urged by a growing number of the participants in President Gorbachev’s State of The World

Forum to set forth his personal insights gained from his almost four-decades of direct personal

experience and public service as the person who initiated and supervised more than one dozen

of the most famous private public interest investigations of his Era into matters which are of

central importance to most members of his Generation, Daniel Sheehan was given a private

grant in the Spring of 2006 by a generous benefactress which allowed him to take time

necessary from his busy schedule of public trials, public speaking engagements and radio and

television interviews to set down the details of the most important insights of his past forty

years of legal and public policy experience and to make these details available to the other

members of his Post World War II Generation, and to the members of his sons’ “Millennial

Generation” who need to know these facts, now more than ever – because their Generation

must now become the new Full-Partners of The Baby Boom Generation in taking up the

challenge of fulfilling the too-long-delayed promises of Western Civilization made to the

people of the world.

The Post World War II “Idealist” Generation – must take immediate concrete steps that will

enable us to succeed, within our lifetimes, to return the leaders of our Western Civilization to

the utilization of an up-dated, or “modernized”, Natural Law Mode of Ethical Reasoning to

arrive at our collective global public policy-making decisions… before the now-immediately-

looming global thermonuclear war “simply occurs” between China and The United States –

leaving us all wondering, in those last dark, final moments of human life on our planet,

whether there was ever a way…for even for one bright and shining moment…when this

ultimate tragic end to our entire human experiment might possibly have been avoided.

9

The successful discernment, identification and public articulation of such an up-dated and

“modernized” Natural Law Worldview is, then, the ultimate strategic objective of this work.

However, in the spirit of full disclosure… and to encourage an equally complete and open

communication on the part of others in their response to the important subjects addressed in

this work, let it be said, at the outset, that Daniel Sheehan believes that there exist eight

entirely separate and distinct “Human Worldviews” from the perspective of any one of which

the present national and international crisis that presently confronts our world, here in the post

Cold War era, might be perceived and evaluated – with complete integrity.

It is our belief that:

1.) The largest and best-educated Generation in the history of our human family (the so-

called “Baby Boom Generation born during the 21-year period between November of 1942

and November of 1963) IS INDEED a classical “IDEALIST” GENERATION as such a

Generation is identified and described by Strauss and Howe in their 1991 work;

2.) The second largest – and hopefully the newly-best-educated – Generation in the entire

history of our human family (the so-called “Millennial” Generation) born in the final 25-year

period of The 20th Century between 1975 and the Year 2000, will be a classical “CIVIC

GENERATION as is identified and described by Strauss and Howe in their work;

3.) The essential “issues” around which The IDEALIST Generation and The CIVIC

Generation of the 21st Century (“Cycle”) will coalesce will, indeed, be essentially

“SPIRITUAL”. This means: Cosmology; Teleology; Ontology; Epistemology; Mode of

Ethical Analysis and Mode of Spiritual Expression;

4.) The 10-year period between 1965 and 1975 in the United States constituted a classical

“Spiritual Awakening” as identified and described by Strauss and Howe;

5.) It is extremely likely that there is going to occur within the United States (and within

Western Civilization in general) a “SECULAR CRISIS” of absolutely “strategic proportions”

in the next few decades – which will result from the failure on the part of the “Civic

Generation” of the 20th Century “Cycle” to adequately “reconstruct” the social, political and

economic institutional structures of the United States and Western Civilization (following the

“Secular Crisis” of the 20th Century “Cycle” which occurred between 1929 and 1942) to

adequately inculcate within them the essential “Spiritual” Principles enunciated by the

“IDEALIST” Generation of the 20th Century “Cycle” (i.e. THE PROGRESSIVE

GENERATION of The Chautauqua Movement) and as a result of the resistance on the part of

this same “Civic Generation” to agree to “amend” these post World War II institutions to

attempt to inculcate within these reconstructed institutions these same “Spiritual” Principles

when called upon to have done so by the “Idealist Generation” of the 21st Century “Cycle”

between 1965 and 1975 during the “Social Movement” identified as “The Sixties”;

6.) That this “21st century Secular Crisis” is going to take the form of either:

10

a.) A resurgence of a radical nativist movement in the United States (such as we experienced

between 1890 and 1929 during “The Gilded Era” led ideologically by neo- Hegelianists and

Neo-Darwinists) which will evolve into a Fascist State such as that experienced in Germany

in the post 1929 events IF the “Neo-Cons” of the nature of Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and

others remain in political power in the United States… which will result in another worldwide

collapse in upon itself of the global Capitalist economic structure and another “World War”

against the global imperialist Fascist State (this time it being the United States instead of

Germany).

OR

b.) The establishment of a new “Northern Industrial Alliance” between “The G-8” Nations of

NAFTA and the GATT Nations of Europe with RUSSIA against CHINA…which will result

in a major thermonuclear “showdown” between China and “The West (and Russia) before

2050;

7.) That both of these foreseeable alternative “crisis” scenarios can be effectively addressed

by:

(a) Establishing the “alliance” between the Baby Boom Generation 21st Century Cycle

“Idealists” Generation activists and the Millennialist Generation 21st Century Cycle “Civic

Generation” activists (which Strauss and Howe have identified as having been successfully

established in each of the preceding five 100-year historical “cycles” studied in Western

Civilization);

(b) Identifying a common set of Spiritual Beliefs (i.e. pertaining to: Cosmology; Teleology;

Ontology; Epistemology; Mode of Ethical Reasoning and Mode of Spiritual Expression)

which can be commonly adopted with complete integrity by at least a plurality of the 82

million members of the American Baby Boom Generation and by at least a plurality of the 75

million members of the American Millennial Generation;

(c) Devising and putting into concrete operation a massive grassroots public education and

grassroots Congressional District-by-District public organizing and mobilization project

which can effectively “tender” these specific beliefs to this plurality of American citizens and

“mobilize” this plurality of American citizens to freely choose and adopt these specific

beliefs; and

(d) Providing to the American People a Political Party Apparatus that will “translate” this

specific set of “spiritual” beliefs into concrete Principles, Public Policy Proposals and Public

and Private Programs which will effectively translate these “spiritual values” into the public

policy of first the United States, then of Western Civilization as a whole.

It is our further belief that:

The “deductive” structural conclusions of the sociological studies undertaken by Harvard

University’s long-time Chairman of its Department of Sociology, Dr. Talcott Parsons, and his

student Dr. Ralph Potter, the long-time Chairman of The Department of Comparative Ethics

at Harvard University – as these conclusions have been explained and supplemented by

11

Daniel Peter Sheehan in his 2005 work entitled: PARADIGM POLITICS: The Clash of

Worldviews and The Remaking of The American Political Order at The End of The Cold War

– are in fact correct.

SPECIFICALLY, this means that:

It is our further belief that:

8.) There exist EIGHT distinct human “Worldviews” pursuant to which adherents to each of

these distinct Worldviews hold a distinctly integrated set of beliefs pertaining to: Cosmology;

Teleology; Ontology; Epistemology and a resultant Philosophy: which, in turn, generate a

specific: Political Philosophy; Theory of Human Psychology; Mode of Ethical Reasoning;

Mode of Spiritual Expression and Social Form;

9.) These eight distinct human Worldviews derive directly from the fact that members of

our human species possess, as an integral function of our human anatomy (within the specific

“octave” range of vibrational frequency within which our solar system/galaxy arises) eight

distinct biological “energy centers” within and immediately above our human body…that, in

turn, generate eight distinct “energy fields” which surround our physical bodies, each of a

different vibrational frequency (each “energy field” of which vibrates in sympathetic

resonance with the specific vibrational frequency of the corresponding “energy center” from

which this “energy field” originates) and

10.) Each individual human being directly experiences “Reality” prism-ed through the

distinct complex of the eight contiguous differing energy fields which surround his or her

body;

It is our further belief that:

The subjective structural conclusions of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the 20th Century Jesuit

Paleontologist are also factually correct. SPECIFICALLY, this means that:

11.) There exists objectively a biologically pre-determined “ideal”:

a.) frequency at which each of the eight human biological “energy centers” in the human body

should vibrate;

b.) rate of “rotation” at which each of these eight distinct “energy centers” within each human

body should rotate; and

c.) angle to the ecliptic at which each of these eight distinct “energy centers” within each

human body should incline

Which, we believe, would result in each such human being, within whom each of these three

ideal conditions obtained, being an “ideal” human being who would be able to experience

“Reality” in an entirely “objective” manner.

12

However:

We believe further that:

12.) Our human species is presently at a point at which virtually every human being presently

dwelling on our Earth is in a state of only partial evolution toward an ideal “OMEGA

POINT” of human evolution at which each of we human beings will have fully evolved eight

distinct physical senses (one correlating to each of our eight distinct human “energy centers”)

by means of which eight distinct human physical senses each of us will be able to fully

experience Reality as it “objectively” is;

13.) That there exists CO-TERMINUS WITH the physical confines of our Universe a

functioning HOLOGRAPHIC PHENOMENON which is naturally drawing up into

Holographic Harmony with The Master Hologram of The Universe each and every sub-

structure of this Hologram (of which we, as human beings, are one such sub-structure.)

We, therefore, believe, further, that:

14.) There is a natural evolutionary teleology functioning entirely physically within our

physical Universe pursuant to which we, as a physical species, will inevitably and

progressively evolve toward that “Omega Point” at which each and every individual human

being will be perfected … So long as we do not physically destroy ourselves…and our planet

…before we naturally reach this “Perusia.”

However:

15.) There are a number of specific physical exercises and physical practices which can be

consciously undertaken by individual human beings during their natural lifetimes which, if

assiduously practiced can – and will – accelerate that individual’s otherwise entirely natural

biophysical state…so that one

(a) increases one’s Sixth Sense of “Intuition” (“Pure Reason”),

(b) gives one access de novo to one’s SEVENTH FACILITY of direct experiential access to

THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS

from which our physical Universe emanated … and

(c) gains one direct access to one’s EIGHT FACULTY … by means of which one begins to

experience life as HOMO DIVINIS.

We believe, further, that:

16.) We, as human beings, are distinguished from previous stages of biological evolution on

our planet, by our evolution of a sixth physical sense (over and above all of our five

traditional physical senses of: touch, taste, smell, hearing and seeing), this being:

13

INTELLECTUS (or self-conscious linear thought.) But we believe that there have existed, in

the past – and presently exist among us – individual human beings who are biological

harbingers of a NEW SEVENTH PHYSICAL SENSE – which is a biological physical sense

by means of which these extra-ordinary individual human beings are able to directly

physically experience the holographic BONDING PHENOMENON which constitutes the

MATRIX of the physical Universe…thus providing these individuals direct access to “NON-

local” knowledge (both spacial and temporal) of the full contours of REALITY.

These beings we call “PROPHETS” and their insights and pronouncements (and their

extraordinary physical deeds) are the basis of the Seven Major Human Modes of Spiritual

Expression.

We believe that:

17.) The bio-physically-based Worldview that entails the knowledge of this REALITY is

THE SIXTH PARADIGM WORLDVIEW, which is the Worldview of INTUITION.

We believe that:

Which “miracles” are also the “product” of the fact that all eight of their “energy centers” are

functioning at their “perfect-ed” vibrational frequency, rate of physical rotation and angle of

inclination.

18.) There exist TWO ADDITIONAL potential human “senses” or “faculties”…these being:

A new biological “faculty” by means of which each individual human being can potentially

directly experientially access union with THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF

UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS out of which our physical Universe emanated,

and

One other new biological faculty – the nature of which we do yet know… because this

experience is the experience of a new faculty that is the first “faculty” of the next species into

which we are evolving after we reach “perfection” as members of the species homo sapien

sapien… a species which we identify as HOMO DIVINIS which exists in another “octave” of

harmonic vibrational frequency ONE FULL OCTAVE HIGHER than the “octave” within

which our REALITY physically “manifests”.

2. Crain Brinton & Humanity’s most Important Insight

In April of 1968, when I was a First-Year law student at Harvard Law School, after

graduating from Harvard College the year before, at the very height of the Vietnam War

protests on college campuses across our nation, Professor Crain Brinton, the forty-year

Chairman of Harvard University’s Department of Intellectual History, publicly announced his

14

intention to retire at the end of that academic year. He concurrently announced that he was

going to reveal to the “Ten Thousand Men of Harvard”, in his final public lecture that year,

“the most important single human idea which he had ever encountered” in his over fifty years

of research in the field of Intellectual History while at at Harvard University.

On the assigned day of his final lecture, several hundred undergraduates, graduate school

students from across the campus and alumni from around the world (who traveled from the far

corners of the world to attend this much-hailed event) crowded into Lowell Hall to which

Professor Brinton’s Final Lecture had been moved in order to accommodate the expected

overflow crowd of attendees.

Taking the lectern, he looked out across the prestigious crowd which had gathered to hear his

message. He began by reminiscing about the many hundreds of Harvard College graduates

who, long after having graduated from Harvard College and departing from Cambridge for

the far corners of the world, had taken the time to write to him to thank him for having

exposed them, during their undergraduate years at Harvard College, to “The Great Ideas of

Man.”

He then turned to the task which brought him before that esteemed crowd on that sunlit

springtime morning in 1968:

“You have come from far away, and near, to hear my account of what I have concluded to be

“The Most Important Single Human Idea” that I have ever encountered in my over fifty years

of research in the field of Human Intellectual History here at Harvard. Surprisingly, it has not

been difficult for me to make this determination.

While many thought that the answer would be “Human Freedom”, or “Democracy” or even

“Human Equality” or some such other well-deserving human idea, the answer is, in fact, as

follows:

A hush fell across the waiting crowd. Five hundred faces looked up in anticipation, most of

which he had seen before, across the many years, when they were much younger, but no less

eager to learn.

“It is my belief, after all these years, that the greatest and most important single idea which

has occurred to the human mind in the entire recorded history of our species and which

stands, therefore, above all others, as the most cherished and the most esteemed idea of

humankind is this:

He turned solemn and looked up from his notes out into the faces arrayed below and said:

“The greatest minds among our human family, from the earliest recoded history, down to this

very day, have recognized the fact that we, today, stand on the very brink of a new step in the

15

biological evolution of our human species… a step which will differentiate us, as a species,

from homo sapiens as much as homo sapiens were distinguished from homo erectus – and

“That this step in our biological evolution will take the form of the evolution of a new and

additional biological faculty… a biological ‘faculty’ – just like ‘seeing’ or ‘hearing’ … but

this new faculty will enable us to directly, physiologically experience – just as we experience

the physical phenomena of light and sound – the physical phenomenon which bonds together

every single ultimately non-divisible unit of matter in the entire physical universe into one,

single, harmonious WHOLE.

“And, that, by means of this unique, new physical experience, we – each one of us, as

individual human beings… no matter what our race, no matter what our gender, no matter

what our place of national origin or our individual religious belief – will be able to directly

and experientially know what particular human conduct – both individual and collective – is

either in direct physical ‘harmony with’ or is in direct physical ‘dis-harmony to’ the

NATURAL ORDER OF THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.

“And I am personally convinced that this historical event in all of the history of humankind is

coming to fruition within this very Generation.”

He paused. And he looked down upon the young men of The Post World War II “Baby

Boom” Generation who were gathered before him as his undergraduate class and he said:

“And THIS is why I believe that so many of you, in your Generation, have refused to go fight

in this unjust and illegal war.”

With this, the entire crowd of Harvard men rose to their feet as one and broke into

spontaneous applause and cheering. Crain Brinton smiled and bowed to his students. He then

closed his notes, turned and silently left the lectern. He died within one month of his

retirement, never having written a word of what he had concluded, never having made another

public statement about this.

But his words live on, in the minds of those hundreds of Harvard College graduates who were

privileged, on that Spring day in 1968, to have been present for that famous lecture…and in

the writings and speeches of “the greatest minds among our species” down through the years.

There has been no more paradigmatic a statement of “The Progressive Worldview” that I have

ever read or heard.

The unique time, the unique place, the unique audience, the unique speaker and the unique

historical setting in which this statement was made all contribute to making this statement a

very significant piece of evidence in the growing body of evidence which is gradually

establishing the fact that the Moment has arrived, within our very lifetimes, when this Next

Step in the political evolution of our Western Culture is immediately at hand.

16

It is truly an Idea Whose Time Has Come, now… after all of these long…long years of

waiting in our civilization.

Crain Brinton’s talk helped inspire and shape the work contained in this website, read on to

learn more.

17

3. Worldviews This page looks at broad-brush characteristics of the seven major worldviews currently embraced by humanity. The upper half of the chart

represents the “higher” manifestations of the worldviews, the bottom half represents the “lower” manifestation. The people and ideas referenced

here represent the logical conclusions you would naturally come to as a subscriber to a particular worldview, not necessarily meaning that they

represent that worldview as a whole.

7th Paradigm

Left

Systematists

6th Paradigm

Left Marginalists

5th Paradigm

Left Middle

Marginalists

4th Paradigm

Middle

Marginalists

3rd Paradigm

Right Middle

Marginalists

2nd Paradigm

Right

Marginalists

1st Paradigm

Right

Systematists

World

Religion Mysticism

Bhuddism, Intuitive

Monism

Islam

Christianity

Judaism

Taoism

Animism

Religious

Manifestation Mystical Deism

Theosophy,

Anthroposophy,

Great White

Brotherhood

Pythagorian,

Platonism, Sufism

Trinitarian,

Christianity

Kabalism

Shaolian, Taoism

Animist

Shamanism, Pan

Psychism

Modern

Exponent

Nelson Mandela,

Desmond Tutu,

Dom Holder

Vaclav Havel,

Gorbachov

Jimmy Carter

Social Order Utopian

Progressive

Idealistic

Moderationism

Conservationism

Reactive

Authoritative

18

Intuitonism

Political Style

Political

Theory

Gaiaism

Philosophy

Rudolph Steiner

Karl Popper

Bertran Russel

Mode of

Ethical

Reasoning

Teleology

Deepak Chopra,

Charan Kalsa,

Conscious

Evolutionism

Psychology

Stan Grof

Epistemology Teresa di Avila

Evelyn Underhill

Ontology

Ken Wilber

Physics

E. Shroediger

Cosmology

David Bohm

19

Faculty Soul

ESP

Know

Hear

Smell

Taste

Touch

Musical Key B

A

G

F

E

D

C

Verb Am

Will

Communicate

Love

Think

Feel

Act

Chakras Crown Chakra

Brow Chakra

Throat Chakra

Heart Chakra

Solar Plexus

Chakra

Sacral Chakra

Root Chakra

Function Being

Intuition

Communication

Love

Power Assertion

Procreation

Survival

Form of

Matter Spirit

Quantum

Subatomic

Atomic

Gaseous

Liquid

Solid

Body Divine

Monadic

Atomic

Buddhic

Mental

Astral

Physical

Scope Galactic

Interplanetary

Planetary

Continentalist

Nationalistic

Racial

Tribal

Cosmology William Stroeger

Keppler

Pythagoras

Steven Hawking

Galileo,

Copernicus

Eternal

Oscillation

Entropy

Physics

Einstein

Newton

20

Ontology John Paul II

Mme. Blavatsky

Plato

Aristotle

Descartes

Johann Fichte

Daniel Dennett

Epistemology Theology

Philo

Thomas Aquinas

Emanuel Kant

David Hume

Lucretius

Epicurius

Psychology

Jung

Freud

Teleology

Teilhard de

Chardin,

Escatology

Max Plank

John Locke

Scientific Logical

Perfectionism

Kierkegard

Hegel

Charles Darwin,

Daniel Dennett

Mode of

Ethical

Reasoning Hans Kueng

Stoicism

John Rawles

John Stuart Mill,

Jeremy Bentham

Jean Paul Sartre

Nietzsche

Self-Interest

Philosophy Deism

Monism

Platonism

Aristotelianism

Existentialism

Dialectical

Materialism

Materialism

Political

Theory Theocracy

Stoic Natural Law

Social Democrats

Democrats

Republicans

Adam Smith, Karl

Marx

Thomas Hobbes

Political Style Theocratic

Progressive

Liberal

Moderate

Conservative

Reactionary

Totalitarian

Social Order

Medieval

Royalism

Senatorial City-

Stateism,

Alexandrian

Philosopher King

Representative

Bicameral

Parliamentarian

Democracy

Secular

Monarchism

State Capitalism,

Communism

Facism

21

Modern

Exponent Bryan Hehr

Vaclav Havel

Z. Brzezinsky

Mario Cuomo

Samuel

Huntington

Henry Kissinger

Richard Perl

Religious

Manifestation

Medieval

Catholicism

Occult Theosophy

Pythagorian

Platonism

Medieval

Scholastic

Catholicism,

Scientific

Positivism

British

Angelicanism

State Calvinism

Tribal Voodoism

22

3.1. What makes a worldview?

It is commonly understood that there exist questions in philosophy and physics that are

beyond the scope of our limited human senses and intellect. However, we all come to our own

conclusions to create a self-consistent and complete view of the universe and our place in it.

The way that we answer these “unanswerable” questions (i.e. How did the universe come into

being? How did life evolve and our consciousness develop?) has a large effect on how we live

our lives and make every day decisions. Recognizing and categorizing these answers allows

us to see the thought processes that resulted in an action or decision. Being aware of other

people’s sometimes vastly different worldviews then allows us to communicate more

effectively and hopefully will lead to more effective decision making as a society.

Pillar Beliefs

The pillar beliefs, or “ultimate facts” are answers to questions we cannot objectively answer

given our five senses and the faculty of reason and logic. All reasonable people will come to

conclusions on questions such as “how did the universe begin?” and “how did human

consciousness arise?” However, as a whole, humanity comes up with a wide and colorful

spectrum of answers to these questions that then inform our everyday decisions and actions.

Defining and categorizing these questions and the spectrum of answers they produce can then

give us great insight into the decisions of others and help communication between people with

vastly different ways of looking at the world. We analyze the pillar beliefs by looking at the

answers to four sets of existential questions:

The Cosmological Question:

How did our physical universe first come into being, and what are the physical laws that

govern its past, present, and future functioning?

The Teleological Question:

Is there a specific direction in which our physical universe is unfolding, and if there is,

what is the role of our human species, if any, in this unfolding?

The Ontological Question:

How did sentient consciousness come into being (especially human consciousness)?

The Epistemological Question:

What are the means by which we as human beings are capable of discerning the “facts”

that constitute the answer to ultimate cosmic questions such as these?

Mode of Ethical Reasoning

The methodology be means of which we determine what is “Right” and what is “Wrong”,

what is “Good” and what is “Bad” – or even what is “Better” and what is “Best” from among

apparent “options” presented to us by our universe.

23

Philosophy

Generated by the composite of specific “Answers” that one determines for oneself to these

previous “Cosmic Questions.”

Political Philosophy: Theory as to how we, as human beings, “ought” to go about

collectively deciding how to decide what the Principles, Policies and Programs are pursuant to

which we should make our collective “community” decisions governing how we live

together…and what the comparative degree of importance is hat we should attribute to “The

Collective” or “The Individual.”

Social Order: The particular “form and structure” that Adherents to each such “Worldview”

believe ought to be put into place, through the “authority” of The Collective Community, in

which we, as human beings, should live together in our human communities.

Theory of Human Psychology: Theory as to how our individual human Mind “works” in

conjunction with “The outside world.”

Mode of Spiritual Expression: “Theological” and/or “Meta-Physical” theory pursuant to

which we as human beings might comport ourselves “in the face of The Mystery” which is

The Universe and/or its “Source.”

The vast majority of the members of our American Electorate do not, to any meaningful

degree, understand the “differences” between the “Principles, Policies and Programs” that are

likely to be espoused by someone identified as “Liberal” and the “Principles, Policies and

Programs” that are likely to be espoused by someone we identify as “Conservative.”

Beyond the political left and right, there exist seven entirely distinct “Worldviews” from

amongst which we can possibly choose in determining what the “Principles, Policies and

Programs” will be that we wish to adopt, here in the 21st Century, by means of which to

address – and, hopefully, to remedy – national and global public policy problems that will

confront us in the 21st Century.

Finally – and perhaps most-importantly – very few Americans can tell which of these

alternative “Worldviews” any particular person – for example the Candidate for The Office of

President –actually adheres to…IF ANY…in attempting to make our “choice” among and

then between them – because virtually EVERY Official Candidate does the very best that he

or she can to convince the members of whichever audience he or she is speaking to at any

given moment that that Candidate adheres to that “Worldview” that is the “Worldview” that is

shared by the members of THAT particular audience to which he or she is speaking at the

time. In short, virtually ALL Candidates for the modern American Presidency attempt to

conceal his or her true “Worldview” fro potential voters…or, even worse, he or she insists

that he or she does NOT even HAVE anyspecific “Worldview.”

24

Such a “reality” hardly recommends such a person to hold the most powerful political

position in human history, a position in which he or she will be presented with repeated

situations in which he or she will have to make almost immediate – and potentially world-

altering – decisions.

For, without such a “Worldview”, what criteria will such a person employ in making such

important – and potentially world-altering – decisions?

3.2. Modes of Ethical Reasoning We define a mode of ethical reasoning as the resultant strategy one adopts as a result of their

understanding of the universe and their place in it. This strategy, or methodology is the

means by which we determine what is “Right” and what is “Wrong”, what is “Good” and

what is “Bad” – or even what is “Better” and what is “Best” from among apparent options

presented to us by our universe.

1st paradigm

Since each individual has nothing more than his or her own five physical senses by means of

which to physically perceive “Reality” and only his or her own personal degree of Intellectual

Acuity by means of which to organize into some strictly relative pattern of meaning these

otherwise disparate pieces of purely physical data, each individual will perceive Reality itself

in accordance with his or her our best… selfish… interests.

Ultimately, the only “meaningful” comparable ethical referent is THE DEGREE TO WHICH

EACH INDIVIDUAL PERSON IS ABLE TO MAXIMIZE HIS OR HER OWN PERSONAL

PLEASURE AND TO MINIMIZE HIS OR HER OWN PHYSICAL PAIN.

There is no absolute or objective “TRUTH.” There is no “RIGHT.” There is no “WRONG”.

There is simply the exercise of RAW POWER the power to declare what ought to be

CONSIDERED to be “the facts” in any given situation. And it is perfectly understandable –

indeed RIGHT – that each individual person attempt to physically or intellectually compel

every other individual to recognize his or her Reality, the “Reality” that identifies his or her

Maximum Physical Pleasure and his or her Minimum Physical Pain, as THE Paramount

VALUE in the entire Universe.

THEREFORE:

When faced with a given PUBLIC POLICY or COMMUNITY problem, it is perfectly

predictable – and, indeed, “RIGHT” – that each individual person would – and should –

attempt to “exploit” that particular public problem to MAXIMIZE HIS OR HER OWN

PERSONAL PHYSICAL PLEASURE and to MINIMIZE HIS OR HER OWN PERSONAL

PHYSICAL PAIN.

25

Therefore, when confronted with a range of alternative “choices” that might be made as to

WHAT one ought do to in response to a given “Public Policy Problem,” one merely selects

that specific choice that one believes (based upon one’s own best physical data processed

through one’s own intelligence) generates the greatest degree of short-term physical pleasure

to ONE’S OWN SELF and that generates the least degree of short-term physical pain to

ONE’S OWN SELF (or, by simple physical extension, the choice that generates the greatest

degree of physical pleasure and the least possible degree of physical pain to ONE’S OWN

immediate biological family members.)

The adoption of this specific Mode of Ethical Reasoning is the straight-forward rational

product of there being no other referent for “Right” or “Wrong” that we, as rational human

beings, are capable of physically EXPERIENCING through our only five physical senses.

And, of course, one’s experience is expressly limited to one’s biological or physical

experiences that place an absolute limit on the efficacy of attempting to rally individual

human beings to some more abstract, NON physical ethical referent. There simply is no other

such referent. There is certainly no “Cosmic” referent by means of which any individual

human being is personally capable of directly physically experiencing The Cosmos itself.

Since nothing holds REALITY together in any predictable, reliable system in accordance with

which one can reliably say that any act is either “Right” or “Wrong”, I will get “MINE” and I

will seek to generate an immediate sense of physical security around ME and around MY

IMMEDIATE BIOLOGICAL EXTENSIONS. This is the ONLY true referent for “Right”

and “Wrong” that I can directly experience through my five senses.

Thus only Might makes “Right.” Indeed, Might makes REALITY itself. For there IS no other

REALITY on which we can depend.

2nd paradigm

As a result of this specific Epistemological Belief on the part of Adherents to The Second

Paradigm Worldview, Adherents to this Second Paradigm Worldview believe that, while

every person is capable of articulating his or her own thesis as to what is “Real” and what is

“True” and is, therefore, capable of asserting his or her thesis as to what “The Facts” are

pertaining to any given matter, this thesis will then take its place “in the market place of

ideas” – AND, since this thesis is only relative, other persons (having a different

“perspective” based upon their different life experiences and different location in relationship

to the facts) will generate an ANTI-thesis (asserting that “The Facts” are different than those

asserted by the proponent of the thesis).

As a result of the “dynamic” generated by the bi-polar expanding and contracting of the

physical Universe, this thesis and this ANTI-thesis will struggle in contention with one

another “in the market place of ideas” – and, consisting only of relative truth, each will burn

26

away that portion of the other’s thesis which is NOT “true,” generating a “SYN-thesis” made

up of the more truthful portion of each thesis. This synthesis will then become the new

operative THESIS which will take the field in the market place of ideas asserting its

contention as to what “The Facts” are pertaining to the matter at hand.

It must be understood that “TRUTH” will NEVER be known to any degree of absolute

certainty by simple human beings. However, through this dialectical process of struggle

between sequential thesis and anti-thesis and then into synthesis and a new “Thesis” and new

Anti-thesis, our human family will struggle TOWARD the “truth” concerning “The Facts”.

The above-described dialectical process characterized by struggle between a relative thesis

and an opposing relative Anti-thesis is The Mode of Ethical Reasoning through which human

beings will progress toward the “Right.” “Right” is NOT to be obtained through the mere

imposition of an arbitrary assertion of “Fact” by the most powerful (as occurs pursuant to the

First Paradigm Worldview) but, rather, through legitimate struggle, pursuant to which the

strictly relatively superior thesis will prevail, leading our human family toward relative truth.

This Mode of Ethical Reasoning is the utilization of “The Dialectical Method.”

Thus, given the perpetual Oscillating Cosmology of the physical Universe and the strictly

Pre-Determined Teleology of the physical Universe, the only realistic Mode of Ethical

Reasoning that could logically be adopted by an Adherent to The Second Paradigm

“Dialectical” Worldview would be to yield to the physical tropism of “jumping on board” one

“SIDE” or the other “SIDE” of whatever dialectic one is physically cast into by the physical

Universe or which is physically presented to one by the physical Universe.

Thus Adherents to The Second Paradigm Worldview are intensely Fatalistic. That is, they

accept, indeed actively and enthusiastically embrace, whatever the local dialectic happens to

be into which he or she is born. Indeed, they utterly internalize the bona fides of their local

community’s dialectic and become champions of the specific “SIDE”on to which they were

born.

This is, indeed, the very mechanism of their “Mode of Ethical Reasoning.” Thus, any and all

choices are governed by the simple principle of “Which action best ‘serves’ MYside in the

dialectical struggle in which my family, my community or my tribe is engaged with ‘The

Ultimate OTHER” ?

3rd paradigm

Because of this unique Epistemological Belief on the part of Adherents to The Third

Paradigm Worldview, Adherents to this Worldview employ an equally unique “Mode of

Ethical Reasoning.” The Mode of Ethical Reasoning employed by Adherents to The Second

Paradigm Worldview is a rigidly dialectical Mode of Ethical Reasoning and from the Mode

of Ethical Reasoning of Adherents to The First Paradigm Worldview who employ a consistent

Mode of Ethical Reasoning which, when faced with a number of alternative action choices by

means of which to respond to a given problem, will always choose that action which merely

27

maximizes that person’s personal degree of short-term physical pleasure and/or minimizes

that person’s personal degree of immediate physical pain.

This unique “Mode of Ethical Reasoning” employed by the Adherents to The Third Paradigm

“Right Middle-Marginalist” Worldview is this:

Adherents to The Third Paradigm “Right Middle-Marginalist” Worldview, when confronted

with a number of optional actions from amongst which to choose by means of which to

respond to a given problem will first: Choose which “REALITY” they can rationally project

out into the future to be probable and potentially true and they then choose to engage in, or

choose to endorse as “better,” that particular action which will maximize that REALITY

(which he or she has chosen to make “REAL”) as though THAT “Reality” were REAL.

This is an “Existential” Mode of Ethical Reasoning…or a Mode of Ethical Reasoning which

is directed toward making The World into The World which the Adherent to The Third

Paradigm Worldview can rationally “project” as being potentially EXISTENT.

4th paradigm

When faced with a number of alternative “choices” from amongst which to select, an

Adherent to the Middle-Marginalist position will always select that choice which generates

“the greatest good for the greatest number”, the classical “Utilitarian” choice. They are thus

not ideological. They are pragmatic …almost mathematic in their ethical decision-making.

They do not attach metaphysical values to data. They are strictly “rational.” They are the

“Mentants” of Frank Herbert’s DUNE. They are the “Dr. Spocks” of Gene Rodenberry’s

STAR TREK.

5th paradigm

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview exercise all of the purely scientific criteria of

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview in gathering their data, but, since they hold the

Epistemological Belief that we, as human beings, have direct experiential access to the very

real “Realm of The Ideal Forms,” Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview supplement

their data derived from their exercise of Scientific Logical Positivism with an exercise of

Intuition … causing them to modify their otherwise purely Majoritarian Utilitarian Mode of

Ethical Reasoning with an Intuitive supplement. This “Intuitive supplement” causes

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview to select options which, while these choices do

generate “the greatest good for the greatest number” these choices also at the same time

generate “at least something for the very least well off. This Fifth Paradigm “Liberal” Mode

of Ethical Reasoning is discussed, in detail, by Professor John Rawls in his famous work

entitled A Theory of Justice published, in 1972, by Harvard University Press.

28

Professor Rawls attributes the adoption of this specific “Mode of Ethical Reasoning” by

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm “Liberal” Worldview to the influence upon otherwise rigid

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview of The Sixth Paradigm “Intuitionist”

Worldview.

However, the adoption of the Fifth Paradigm Mode of Ethical Reasoning which attributes

merely a supplemental importance to the data obtained via the human Intuitive faculty is the

product of an entirely distinct “Cosmology”, “Teleology”, “Ontology” and “Epistemology”

on the part of Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview. They attribute a merely

supplemental role to this data NOT as a merely Utilitarian judgment, but, instead, experience

the human “Faculty of Intuition” as merely supplemental to their otherwise strictly

Intellectual Faculty.

This is because their ONTOLOGICAL Belief informs Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm

Worldview that we, as human beings, are capable ONLY of imitating the “Ideal”

Consciousness of The Cosmos, NOT of Being AT ONE WITH the Consciousness of The

Cosmos. For this reason, Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm are willing to place ONLY a

supplemental degree of reliance upon the data obtained via this imitation of “Ideal”

Consciousness.

One will recall that Plato, the ultimate Philosopher of The Fifth Paradigm, places the “Ideal”

human observer in the position, in his “Allegory of The Cave” (in his Republic), ONLY in-

between the Fire and the REAL “Players”, thereby being uniquely capable of recognizing that

the “Shadows” cast by the Fire upon the wall of the cave are only shadows. But even this

“Ideal” observer is not the real Player. Therefore, pursuant to the Ontology of The Fifth

Paradigm, even the “Ideal” human observer is ONLY capable of “imitating” the conduct of

the REAL Player. So, such an “Ideal” participant in Reality is ONLY an imitator (an “Actor”)

and is NOT entitled to have the ABSOLUTE confidence in his judgments which a “REAL

PLAYER” would have. He is only somewhere in-between a shadow and a “Real Player.” So,

he should act “in moderation” on the basis of his perception of “The Ideal.”

Thus, for the Adherent to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview, the Intuitional experience

functions, properly, solely as a supplement to his otherwise entirely reason-based scientific

judgments… NOT because an Adherent to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview is nothing more

than a more practical utilitarian (as Professor Parsons’ asserts) but because he holds a

profound Ontological Belief that his Faculty of Reason holds him forever separate and apart

from the fully-engulfing Intuitive Experience which would allow (or compel) him to give to

this Intuitive Experience the truly Central role in his or her decision-making process.

Functioning as true Utilitarians, Professor Rawls argues, in “A Theory of Justice,” that some

Adherents to the Fourth Paradigm Scientific Logical Positivist Worldview take into full

account the potential bone fides of the Sixth Paradigm Intuitionists assertions that they, as

human beings, are capable of directly experiencing an other dimension of Reality which

generate bona fide data and, therefore, according to Professor Rawls, some Adherents to The

Fourth Paradigm Worldview simply add in the data obtained by the Adherents to The Sixth

29

Paradigm Worldview to the data obtained from their strictly “Scientific Logical Positivist”

sources as Fourth Paradigm Adherents generating a “Hybrid” (as distinct from a genuinely

generic) Fifth, “Liberal” Worldview. However, according to Professor Rawls, Adherents to

The Fifth Paradigm Worlsview do NOT attribute central importance to this Sixth Paradigm

Intuitive data. They treat this Sixth Paradigm data as simply supplemental to the data they

have garnered via their Scientific Logical Positivist Epistemology.

6th paradigm

The distinctive aspect of the Mode of Ethical Reasoning of the Sixth Paradigm “Radical

Monist” Worldview is that they believe that this FACULTY OF INTUITION (experienced

through the Seventh Chakra) should play a CENTRAL ROLE in each individual human

being’s “Normative decision-making” or as their “Mode of Ethical Reasoning.”

Substantively, Adherents to the Left-Marginalist Worldview believe that, when faced with a

range of choices to address a given public policy problem, one should choose the form of

human conduct which is most harmonious with the NATURAL LAWS of the physical

Universe. The method(s) which one goes about determining what form of human conduct is,

or is NOT “harmonious with” NATURAL LAW (and what forms of conduct are expressly

“dis-harmonious” to NATURAL LAW) are determined by the utilization of the various

Methods of Determining “The Facts.”

However, the central means which should be employed in making this specific decision is to

resort to one’s own personal Intuition.

HOWEVER, Once this factual determination has been made by each individual who is a

member of the community which will be directly effected by the public policy choice chosen,

Adherents to the Left-Marginalist Worldview insist that a specific procedural process must

then be employed by means of which “The Community” ought to determine which choice

among the several available will be chosen. And the utilization of this specific procedure by

means of which to make such an inherently community choice is INTEGRAL to the “MODE

of Ethical Reasoning” which is advocated by Left- Marginalists.

The proceedure is this:

Every person who is going to be directly or indirectly effected by the public policy choice

which is being made on behalf of the Community must be informed concerning all of the

component elements pertaining to the decision, then be afforded an adequate time period prior

to his or her having to render this decision to educate himself or herself as to what he or she

will need to know to make a fully-prepared choice concerning the matter. Thirdly, every such

person must be given a fair opportunity to express his or her views on the matter and to

attempt to persuade others that his or her view should be adopted by the Community. And

then, finally, every such person who is going to be directly effected by the decision made

must be given the opportunity to VOTE on which specific public policy choice is going to be

chosen by the community.

30

This is referred to as a SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC decision-making process. (This process does

NOT require that all such votes be unanimous. Such votes may fairly be determined by a

specific, previously-agreed-upon percentage of the total votes cast or of the total eligible

voting members of the community. This may be a simple majority of one-half plus one; a

plurality; a two-thirds majority, a three-fourths majority – or whatever percentage is deemed

fair by a prior agreement reached by the community prior to the undertaking of this vote).

The need to undertake this process for every major public policy choice effecting each

member of the community is the product of a substantive NATURAL LAW PRINCIPLE. So,

to Adherents of the Left-Marginalist Worldview, the utilization of this process is a Natural

Law substantive value in and of itself. In effect, this value dictates that there are instances in

which it is ethically preferable to have NO decision made to address a given public policy

problem which will be enforced upon the individuals in the community (if no single

alternative choice available generates the support of a specific percentage of the community

members) rather than to have a clear choice made which might well solve that specific public

policy problem at issue, but which is actively opposed by (or is not affirmatively accepted by)

a high percentage of the members of the community effected.

Thus, there are two equally-important aspects of the distinctive Mode of Ethical Reasoning

which is believed in by Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview. The first, which is

substantive, is that a “Natural Law Ethic” be employed (and that each individual utilize, as the

central means by which he or she determines whether a given option is harmonious or dis-

harmonious with Natural Law, the Faculty of INTUITION.) The second, which is procedural,

is that the procedure employed by the community to make its collective decision be Social

Democratic (as defined above).

7th paradigm

Every decision made by a systematic Adherent to the Left- Systematist Worldview is made

pursuant to an adherent’s effort to discern THE WILL OF GOD pertaining to that

decision - that is: to determine (through an exercise of ALL of the “methods of determining

the facts” [including one of, or both of, the modalities of “prayer’ identified therein]) what

particular choice, from among those which are available to the adherent, is most consistent

with the “WILL” of The Infinite and Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness which

enfolded into being the entire physical Universe, which entirely pervades every

micro-milli-meter of this material Universe at every moment, and to which each such

adherent owes his or her very continuing life at that very moment - so as to comport his

“perfecting” of the Human Family…and which It has intended since the micro-milli-second at

which It “enfolded into being” this physical Universe.

31

8th paradigm

Adherents to The Eight Paradigm Worldview believe that, once one has “perfected” the

vibrational frequency of each of ALL EIGHT of the human Chakras which are located within

one’s own physical body, one should direct one’s physical body (and all of one’s material and

NON-“material” vibrational fields) to the task of “maintaining”…or to “re-integrating” into

“symphonic harmony” with one another all of the “disparate” (but would be “integrated”)

“multiples” of CONSCIOUSNESS which one finds occurring within the specific time period

of the physically – incarnated life into which one finds oneself “born” into this physical

Universe. These “multiples” of CONSCIOUSNESS are supposed to be vibrating “in

symphonic harmony” with one another as “stepped” whole-number multiples within ONE

OCTAVE of the ONE fundamental “wave length” of THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF OUR

COSMOS which is occurring within our physical Universe.

Therefore, Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview believe that the ONLY truly ethical

human conduct is conduct which is directed to the task of either bringing into perfect

“symphonic harmony” ALL Eight of the Chakras within one’s own human body or (that

having been already achieved) directing all of one’s conscious attention to the task of

“maintaining” …or “re-integrating” into “symphonic harmony” with one another all of the

disparate “multiples” of Consciousness which one finds occurring in one’s world during one’s

lifetime.

The Eighth Paradigm Cosmology necessarily implies that our physical Universe is filled with

Intelligent, Sentient Life. The Latin root of the word “Intelligence” is “intellectus,” the ability

to distinguish the difference between. Intrinsic to The Eighth Paradigm Cosmology,

“Intelligent” Life exists within each different (i.e. “differentiated”) band of vibrational

frequencies, indeed, such “Intelligent Life” is the Conscious “organizer” of “experience”

within each such “band” of vibrational frequencies. Thus, there being other Sentient,

Intelligent Life Forms within our galaxy which have developed technological means of

entering the “band” of vibrational frequencies in which WE abide is entirely foreseeable,

indeed likely.

Therefore, the fact that we, as human beings, have been encountering “other” mysterious Life

Forms… which seem to come into our World from somewhere else is entirely compatible

with the Cosmological assumptions of The Eighth Paradigm. And it is also entirely

compatible with the Cosmological assumptions of The Eighth Paradigm that these other

Beings would display abilities significantly different from the physical abilities which we

human beings are physically capable of performing, trapped as we are within the simple three

(or four) dimensions of our limited physical experience.

32

3.3. The First Paradigm Worldview

Adherents to The First Paradigm Worldview believe that our physical universe began, in a

single moment, with a single Big Bang, that all physical matter was created during this Big

Bang and that the sum total of the matter that was then created is spreading out in an

expanding spatial framework.

Adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe that this Big Bang occurred

approximately 14 billion years ago, and that our physical universe is made up of a fixed and

finite number of ultimately-irreducible integers of matter, each one of which was created at

the moment of the Big Bang event.

Adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe that every single complex combination of

matter is disintegrating into its smaller constituent, ultimately-indivisible, units of matter.

Adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe, further, that each and every ultimately-

irreducible integer of matter in our entire physical universe is, at the same time, repelling

itself out and away from every other such ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in our entire

physical universe.

Adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe that this contemporaneously-occurring

expansion and disintegration of all matter within our physical universe has been going on

since the very earliest stage of our physical universe, and that this contemporaneously-

occurring expansion and disintegration will continue to go on up to the point in time at which

every single ultimately-irreducible integer of such matter that exists in the entire physical

universe will stand separate and apart from each and every other such ultimately-irreducible

integer of matter in the entire physical universe.

Crucially, adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe that our entire physical universe

will ultimately disintegrate into nothingness, and that our physical universe will continue to

expand out and away for all of eternity thereafter.

Adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe that this continued expansion will occur

because there is not enough physical matter in the physical universe to cause the eventual

collapse of the universe into a singularity—a reverse Big Bang. The direct physical attraction

that every ultimately-irreducible integer of matter has for each and every other ultimately-

irreducible integer of is not strong enough to overcome the expansion of the universe. Current

data and analysis tells us the expansion of the universe is accelerating.

Because of the belief that there does not exist enough physical matter in our universe to

generate an adequate amount of physical internal attraction to overcome the force that has

been placed upon each integer of matter by the 14 billion years of expansion and

disintegration that each such unit of matter will have undergone, adherents to the First

Paradigm Worldview believe that our physical universe is absolutely irretrievably destined to

its ultimate physical disintegration into absolute nothingness.

33

Adherents to this First Paradigm Worldview adhere to an ontological belief that human

consciousness is nothing more than a randomly-occurring, accidental physical

epiphenomenon of the interplay of physical matter and energy.

This ontological belief of adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview is articulated most

eloquently and most persuasively by Daniel Dennett in his popular work

entitledConsciousness Explained and again in his work entitled Darwin’s Dangerous Idea.

The epistemology and theory of human psychology that adherents of the First Paradigm

Worldview believe in is strictly sensory and materialist. That is, adherents to the First

Paradigm Worldview hold the epistemological belief that we, as human beings, have access to

no greater truth than that which we can experientially see, touch, taste, hear, or smell through

our five physical senses, which together, communicate the total composite of raw materialist

data that we can directly personally physically experience.

Adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe that our human mind functions as nothing

more than the mechanical, random interplay of physical material interacting within our human

brain, generating physical forces that are totally determined by the random interaction of

physical atoms. This specific theory of epistemology and human psychology has been

thoroughly and thoughtfully articulated by Thomas Hobbes.

In its lower manifestation, the First Paradigm Worldview generates the mode of ethical

reasoning of simple “dog-eat-dog” individualistic self-striving and domination that was

championed by Machiavelli’s The Prince in 1513.

In its higher manifestation, the First Paradigm Worldview generates the mode of ethical

reasoning of Epicurus from 310 B.C., being the mode of ethical reasoning pursuant to

advocating for one to engage in moderation (insonomia), through the voluntary suppression of

the desire for excess pleasure by observing the traditional virtues of justice, temperance,

courage, beauty, friendship, knowledge, etc., each of which was to be undertaken in

moderation for the purpose of assuring to oneself the “good life.” Whereas, the “good life” is

one’s personal life experience that is “sure and secure in a world of uncertainty,” thus being

the only rational course of life.

Because of these combined cosmological, teleological, ontological, and epistemological

beliefs on the part of adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview, adherents, in its lower

manifestation, espouse an essentially pessimistic philosophy, exemplified by Thomas Hobbes.

In its higher manifestation, the First Paradigm Worldview manifests itself in Epicureanism.

The mode of spiritual expression for adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview is strictly

materialist. It only allows for the physical manipulation of the raw physical forces of our

world and universe as a direct function of the chaotic universe by certain shamanically-skilled

and trained individuals.

34

In its lower manifestation, this First Paradigm mode of spiritual expression manifests itself in

the form of shamanism and magic (sometimes in a bad way, for example, as Voodoo, and

sometimes in a good way, for example, in the form of the white magic” performed by

animists and practitioners of Wicca). In its higher manifestation, the First Paradigm mode of

spiritual expression manifests itself in the form of panpsychism, espoused by many of the

most preeminent thinkers in western civilization, including Giordano Bruno, G.W. Liebniz,

Arthur Schopenhauer, W.K. Clifford, F.C.S. Schiller, and Alfred North Whitehead. The

higher manifestation of this First Paradigm Worldview is sometimes expressed in the form of

a belief in Gaia, the panpsychic conscious being that is our planet Earth.

In its political philosophy, the First Paradigm Worldview manifests itself in its lower

manifestation in the form of authoritarian autocracy, such as that practiced by barbarian

autocrats, such as Attila The Hun and Genghis Khan in Ancient Asia. In its higher

manifestation, the First Paradigm Worldview expresses itself in the political philosophy of

authoritative monarchy or benevolent despotism, such as the mythical medieval Saxon

kingdom of Camelot by King Arthur and the Knights of his famous Roundtable, in the

indigenous regimes of the Iroquois Confederacy, of King Quetzalcoatl of the Incas in

Teotihuacan, and by King Huitzilopochtli of the Aztecs in Tenochtitlan.

The Paradigmatic Exemplification of The Lower Manifestation of The First Paradigm

Worldview

Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan

The Paradigmatic Exemplification of The Higher Manifestation of The First Paradigm

Worldview

The Great White Roots of Peace (The Iriquois Confederacy), Camelot of King Arthur

[1] For a full explication of this purely materialist explanation of consciousness, see

Consciousness Explained by Daniel Dennett. See also Darwin’s Dangerous Idea by Daniel

Dennett.

PILLARS OF BELIEF:

3.3.1 The Cosmological Question

How did our physical universe first come into being, and what are the physical laws that

govern its past, present, and future functioning?

The physical universe came into being in one blinding flash that we refer to as the Big Bang.

There is no way for us, as human beings, to tell how or why the physical universe came into

being by means of this Big Bang, or what was going on before the physical universe came

into its physical being, since all we have at our disposal to determine these things are personal

experiences of our five physical senses and our common sense, which only experience things

that have a physical manifestation.

35

The physical universe in which we find ourselves embedded appears, to our five senses and

common sense, to be nothing more than a chaotic collection of a finite number of ultimately

irreducible integers of physical matter. Each such ultimately irreducible integer of physical

matter within this random collection of irreducible units of matter is moving out and away

from every other unit of matter.

Thus, each and every one of these single units of matter that is bonded together with one or

more units of matter to form a combination of matter that is larger than a single quantum field

(units such as a muon, neutron, proton, atom, rock, tree, animal, human being, planet, star,

galaxy, galaxy cluster, or any other combination of matter) is in the active process of

disintegrating into a finite number of ultimately irreducible, individuated quantum fields of

physical matter.

The Big Bang was not a simple explosion that erupted from a physical point at the center of a

physical sphere that was later to constitute our physical universe. Rather, this Big Bang was

the instantaneous manifestation of a physical force that caused every single ultimately

irreducible integer of physical matter in the entire physical universe (i.e., every single such

quantum field) to emit an instantaneous force of repulsion out and away from every other

such quantum field at the exact same instant, thus constituting a universal and center-less

explosion.

The momentum or impetus imparted upon every single ultimately irreducible integer of

matter in the physical universe by this initial Big Bang continues to manifest itself at this very

instant in the expansion of every single quantum field within our physical universe moving

out and away from every other quantum field.

A second force continues to manifest itself at this very instant in the constant atomic

breakdown of each and every element of physical matter in our physical universe into its

ultimately irreducible sub-particles of matter (i.e., into its sub-component constituent quantum

fields) to exponentially multiply the rate of expansion of our universe. When the impetus or

momentum that was imparted upon each of these ultimately irreducible integers of matter at

the moment the Big Bang occurred is spent, every single ultimately irreducible integer of

matter in the entire physical universe will stand separate and apart from every other one.

There will become a point at which each ultimately-irreducible integer of a physical matter’s

quantum field is far enough away from each other quantum field in the universe that they no

longer affect each other in any meaningful way. These ultimately-irreducible integers will

then continue to move out and away from each other so much so that the universe returns to

being empty, void, and in a state of complete nothingness.

That is, there will be nothing in the entire physical universe except each separate, individual,

and ultimately-irreducible quantum field of physical matter standing apart from each other

and continuing to move out and away from each other into infinity.

36

Therefore, the only reality that exists is material reality, and all reality exists only within the

confines of our physical universe. Outside of our physical universe can only be

conceptualized as an infinite and eternal abyss with nothing in it, not even a single quantum

field of physical matter. Such nothingness spreads out and away from the physical confines of

our universe infinitely and eternally.

3.3.2. The Teleological Question

Is there a specific direction in which our physical universe is unfolding, and if there is,

what is the role of our human species, if any, in this unfolding?

Our physical universe is heading inevitably and inextricably toward a state of nothingness.

There is, therefore, no point, no objective, and no ultimate referent for meaning in our

physical universe—there is no meaning, in any ultimate sense, to the physical existence of our

universe.

The universe simply is and, one day, it simply will not be, at least in the form of anything

other than an infinitely-expanding number of effectively unconnected individuated quantum

fields of physical matter, each one having no being other than an entirely unconscious, rock-

like, physical being.

We human beings are merely one of the many, completely arbitrary and random physical

confluences of mass and energy. In turn, mass and energy are nothing more than two differing

compositions and densities of randomly-occurring quantum fields that we arbitrarily and

artificially distinguish along a straight-line continuum, ranging from one single quantum field

to the total collective that we call the physical universe.

Like all inanimate and animate material things that occur in our universe completely

randomly, our creation was nothing more than a purely random event (as has been described

accurately by Charles Darwin and Daniel Dennett in On the Origin of Species and

Consciousness Explained respectively).

There is no internally-driven or externally-driven phenomenon within our material universe

that constitutes a rational referent in relationship to the progression of the human species in

any specific teleological direction (e.g., from good to better). Any such postulate is nothing

more than wishful thinking, a mere projection of our own myopic self-centered wish for self-

importance among the billions of non-life forms and other life forms that exist randomly

within our physical universe.

Human beings, like all other life forms observed on our planet, have always been and always

will be self-centered, self-seeking, self-interested, untrustworthy, and entitled to no special

consideration by the universe. Since our coming down out of the trees in our earlier form, we,

as a species, have been and will inevitably remain territorial, predatory, carnivorous,

murderous, and selfish. As a result, life, including human life, is meaningless, barbarous,

cruel, and short.

37

3.3.3. The Ontological Question

How did sentient consciousness come into being (especially human consciousness)?

Consciousness is nothing more than an arbitrary and meaningless physical epiphenomenon or

function of the specific random interplay of mass and energy of which we and other life forms

are made up. It is merely a kind of physical energy field that just happens to be self-

referential. This specific physical phenomenon is no more unique or important than

phototropism, gravity, light, or the development of chlorophyll—to which we, as human

beings, attach no great cosmic import. We attach special importance to this phenomenon of

consciousness merely because we believe that we have more of it than other sentient beings,

thus making us as a species unique in the universe. This, however, is nothing more than self-

centered solipsism—starting out by positing the ultimate premise of the superiority of

consciousness in us, and then, purportedly discovering its uniqueness and importance within

nature.

3.3.4. The Epistemological Question

What are the means by which we as human beings are capable of discerning the facts

that constitute the answer to ultimate cosmic questions such as these?

As human beings, we have nothing more than our five physical senses, to perceive reality, and

our physical intellect, to physically organize this sensorial data intake into physical patterns.

This epistemological conclusion is reality. All else is, once again, wishful thinking on our part

as human beings.

Therefore, reality looks or feels different to each one of us, depending entirely upon what

individuals physically perceive through their five physical senses. Some people have superior

physical senses, superior physical strength, or a superior intellectual faculty.

The best manner one can use to determine the facts (or “reality”) is recognizing the physical

and mental superiority of those that are most fit and placing that individual person who

possesses the most superior physical strength and the highest degree of intellectual acuity in a

position of authority. One then only needs adopt whatever that superior individual says as

one’s own reality.

In a more modern setting, in order to determine what the facts are or what ultimate reality is,

one need only to go to the authority in the field and adopt what they assert to be fact. This

authority is the leader, the chief, or the head of state.

Pursuant to this mode of ethical reasoning, there is a hierarchy of authority, from the lowest to

the highest, ideally with one supreme individual at the apex of authority capable of resolving

all confusion. Those individuals who demonstrate the power to impose their will over all

others will conquer, govern others, and become the leaders, who, in turn, will exercise the

authority to declare what is fact.

38

3.3.5. Mode of Ethical Reasoning

Since each individual has nothing more than his or her own five physical senses to physically

perceive reality and only his or her own personal degree of intellectual acuity to organize

these otherwise disparate pieces of physical data into some strictly relative pattern of

meaning, each individual will perceive reality in accordance with his or her best, selfish

interests.

Ultimately, the only meaningful, comparable ethical referent is the degree to which each

individual person is able to maximize his or her own personal pleasure and minimize his or

her own physical pain.

There is no absolute or objective truth. There is no right. There is no wrong. There is simply

the exercise of raw power to declare what ought to be considered to be the facts in any given

situation. And, it is perfectly understandable—indeed right—that each individual attempt to

physically or intellectually compel every other individual to recognize his or her reality, the

reality that identifies his or her maximum physical pleasure and his or her minimum physical

pain, as the paramount value in the entire universe.

Therefore, when faced with a given public policy or community problem, it is predictable—

and, indeed, right—that each individual would and should attempt to exploit that particular

public problem to maximize his or her own physical pleasure and minimize his or her own

physical pain.

Therefore, when confronted with a range of alternative choices that might be made as to what

one ought do to respond to a given public policy problem, one merely selects that specific

choice (based upon one’s best physical data processed through one’s intelligence) that one

believes generates the greatest degree of short-term physical pleasure to one’s self and that

generates the least degree of short-term physical pain to one’s self or, by simple physical

extension, the choice that generates the greatest degree of physical pleasure and the least

possible degree of physical pain to one’s immediate biological family members.

The adoption of this specific mode of ethical reasoning is the straightforward, rational

product, which lacks another referent for right or wrong that we, as rational human beings, are

capable of physically experiencing through our five physical senses.

And, of course, one’s experience is expressly limited to one’s physical experiences that places

an absolute limit on the efficacy of the attempts to rally individual human beings to some

more abstract, nonphysical ethical referent. There simply is no other such physically-

experiencable referent. There is certainly no cosmic referent by means of which any

individual human being is capable of directly physically experiencing the cosmos.

Since nothing holds reality together in any predictable, reliable system in accordance with

which one can reliably say that any act is either right or wrong, I will get mine and I will seek

to generate an immediate sense of physical security around me and around my immediate

39

biological extensions. This is the only true referent for right and wrong that I can directly

experience through my five senses.

Thus, only “might makes right.” Indeed, might makes reality itself, for there is no other reality

upon which we can depend.

3.4. The Second Paradigm Worldview

Located one full step to the left of the right-systemist position along Professor Parsons’

Sociological Bar Graph, one encounters the right-marginalist position. Persons who occupy

the right-marginalist position on Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph uniformly

espouse right-marginalist positions on all public policy issues.

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview hold the cosmological belief that our universe

has always existed, but that it undertakes a new cycle of its perpetually-oscillating existence

as the result of the manifestation, within a previously homogeneous void of two singularities

(i.e., two distinctive points of voltage differential), one positive and the other negative.

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that, immediately following the

manifestation of these two distinct points of voltage differential within the otherwise

homogeneous void, a wave function of energy, in the amount of one electron volt unit, flows

between these two distinct points.

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that this wave function of energy

generates a field of discontinuity surrounding its linear pathway through the void. This field

then collapses into the first particle of mass. This first mass generates an even greater field of

discontinuity that surrounds it within the otherwise perfectly homogeneous void. This greater

field of discontinuity then collapses into a second particle of mass. Adherents to the Second

Paradigm Worldview believe that this event replicates itself in an exponentially accelerating

fashion. These first electrons then interact with the first protons to generate a field of

discontinuity around the two particles. These two particles then bond together to form the first

atom, an atom of hydrogen, with one proton and one electron. This process repeats itself until

there are a large number of hydrogen atoms in the void. A smaller amount of helium and trace

amounts of lithium are also created in the initial cosmic furnace.

Adherents to the First and Second Paradigm Worldviews believe that every single more

complex combination of matter (more complex than the smallest, ultimately-indivisible unit

of matter), are ultimately disintegrating into their smaller constituent, ultimately-indivisible

units of matter.

Further, adherents to the First and Second Paradigm Worldviews believe that each and every

ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in our physical universe is, at the same time, repelling

itself out and away from every other ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in our physical

universe.

40

While adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe that this expansion and

disintegration of all matter in the physical universe will continue to go on forever, causing it

to ultimately disintegrate into nothingness. Crucially, adherents to the Second Paradigm

Worldview believe that the expansion of the physical universe will come to a stop. It will

cease to expand, stopping our physical universe from ultimately disintegrating into

nothingness for the rest of eternity. Instead, adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview

believe that, after it stops expanding, the physical universe will stand in a state of equipoise

for one brief moment before it begins to collapse upon itself, reintegrating itself back into

particles of mass (electrons, protons, neutrons, compounds, mixtures, all the way back into

planets, stars, solar systems, star clusters, galaxies, nebulae, etc.).

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that the physical universe’s stopping

and collapsing back into physical matter will occur because they believe that there exists

enough physical matter so that the phenomenon of the direct physical attraction of every

single ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in our universe to every other such integer of

matter will be strong enough to hold our physical universe together. Because of this specific

belief, adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that our physical universe is

irretrievably destined to go through a perpetual physical expansion and contraction.

Importantly, adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that this inevitable

contraction of our physical universe will again, inevitably, result in a unique moment in the

timeline of our physical universe at which every ultimately-irreducible integer of matter will

be in direct physical contact with each and every other ultimately-irreducible integer of

matter, thus constituting a single, super-dense singularity in the otherwise entirely

homogeneous void. At this precise point in time, adherents to the Second Paradigm

Worldview believe that this entire process will begin again, starting with a singularity and

carrying itself on through another cycle of expansion and collapse.

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview hold the cosmological belief that the expansion

and contraction of the physical universe has been going on eternally and will continue to go

on eternally. Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview have the ontological belief that

human consciousness is an absolutely inevitable, natural, and essential function of the

dialectical interplay between the expansive and contractive forces in our physical universe—

between mass and energy. Pursuant to this ontological belief, adherents to the Second

Paradigm Worldview hold the belief that consciousness and human life manifest within each

cycle of the physical universe.

The epistemology and theory of human psychology generated by the Second Paradigm

Worldview is sensory and instinctive. That is, adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview

hold the belief that we, as human beings, have access to a greater truth than that which we can

experientially obtain from the total composite of data that we physically experience through

our five senses because we have the added ability, through an exercise of our instinct, to

discern the existence of a basic dialectical pattern within the data and we can project this

dialectical pattern beyond the confines of our five physical senses to ascertain the fact that a

basic dialectical dynamic underlies all physical reality.

41

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview hold the belief that the functioning of our

instincts is a material activity, but it is capable of discerning the existence of more than a mere

random function of the random interplay of purely physical forces in a random universe.

Instead, they believe that we are able, through the exercise of our instinct, to ascertain the

existence of this dialectical pattern that underlies and supersedes the otherwise merely

apparent chaos of an otherwise entirely random universe. This instinctive discernment enables

adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview to know that there exists a dialectical choice

between two available options at each and every juncture of human decision, thereby

providing to us with a psychology of choice—a much more satisfactory psychological state of

mind than being mere flotsam of random consciousness in an otherwise entirely chaotic

physical universe.

In its lower manifestation, the Second Paradigm Worldview generates the mode of ethical

reasoning of rigid dialectical competition between equal and opposite forces. This generates

Hegelian dialectical reasoning. In its higher manifestation, the Second Paradigm Worldview

generates the mode of ethical reasoning of Lao Tzu, the author of theTao Te Ching (The Way

and Its Virtue). This is the way of the Tao, the binary dance between only apparent opposites

that are, in fact, simply two aspects of a single, intimately interrelated reality.

Because of these combined cosmological, teleological, ontological, and ethical beliefs on the

part of adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview, the lower manifestation of the Second

Paradigm Worldview generates the philosophy of Hegelian dialectics of simple head-to-head

confrontation, competition, winning and losing in direct interpersonal competition between

equal and opposite forces. This philosophy was championed in the Greek city-state of Sparta

and, in modern times, by both capitalism and communism.

In its higher manifestation, the Second Paradigm Worldview generates the mode of ethical

reasoning of Taoism—the constructive binary dialogue advocated by Lao Tzu. This is the

philosophy that underlies the mythical mountain community of Shangri-La.

The mode of spiritual expression of adherents to the Second Paradigm in its lower

manifestation is fundamentalist and antagonistic. This worldview is manifested in

Manichaeism and other religions that emphasize the absolute centrality of the struggle of the

flesh of the material world against the spirit of the transcendent world, the struggle of one’s

own good god against the evil god of one’s neighbor, the struggle of righteousness against

sinfulness, the struggle of light against dark. In its higher manifestation, the mode of spiritual

expression of the Second Paradigm Worldview is Taoism.

In its social form, the Second Paradigm Worldview manifests itself in the form of the Spartan

warrior society, such as that of the Ancient societies of Sparta, the Vikings, and in the 20th

century, it was reflected in Nazi Germany in its lower manifestation. In its higher

manifestation, the Second Paradigm Worldview has expressed itself in the social form of

Shangri-La, the mythical, high-mountain, reclusive, idyllic village community in the

Himalayan Mountains governed by a Taoist Monk and immortalized in the first paperback

book printed in the English language, The Lost Horizon.

42

[1] Though this process needs to progress through the phases of generating first, nutrinos,

meuons, leptons, quarks, etc.

[2] Thus, so long as one knew the precise amount and angle of force which was physically

directed upon each specific ultimately-irreducible quantum field in the entire physical

universe at any given milli-microsecond, one could predict to an absolute degree of certainty

what action was going to take place in the very next milli-microsecond because this next

action would be totally and completely predetermined by the purely physical forces of the

universe. Indeed, every single action from the beginning of time (within that specific cycle of

the physical universe) could be predicted if one knew all of the physical forces imposed upon

every ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in the physical universe at the milli-

microsecond of the Big Bang which started that cycle of the universe.

[3] This specific meaning will be discussed below under the topic of a mode of ethical

reasoning.

[4] An issue, which shall be discussed below as a tenant of other worldviews

[5] The Latin root of origin of which is Intellectus: the ability to distinguish the difference

between

[6] This is, of course, the most very basic issue with which philosophers from Aristotle to

Watts discuss in their work.

PILLARS OF BELIEF:

3.4.1. The Cosmological Question

How did our physical universe first come into being, and what are the physical laws that

govern its past, present, and future functioning?

Adherents to the Second Paradigm, Right-Marginalist Worldview believe that the physical

universe suddenly burst into being at the time of the Big Bang (as do adherents to the First

Paradigm Worldview). They also believe, like the adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview,

that every confluence of ultimatelyirreducible integers of matter in the physical universe is

disintegrating into its constituent component parts, moving outandaway from one another.

However, adherents of the Second Paradigm Worldview differentiate themselves in a

fundamental, indeed categorical, way from adherents of the First Paradigm Worldview.

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that the sum total of the finite number

of ultimatelyirreducible integers of matter is adequately large enough for the sum total of the

force of attraction that exists between this finite number of integers of matter to be great

enough to hold these integers in union, thus, not allowing this finite number of

ultimatelyirreducible integers of matter to continue outandaway from one another and the

locus of the Big Bang into nothingness.

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview adhere to a cosmological belief in which there

exists a large enough number of ultimately-irreducible integers of matter in the physical

universe to generate an adequate degree of attraction between these integers of matter to come

to a full stop in their previous journey out-and-away from one another so as to cause these

43

integers of matter and to remain in a state of perfect stasis for a brief moment. The universe

will then begin contracting due to gravity, and eventually come back to singularity—a reverse

Big Bang.

At that moment at which every ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in the physical

universe is in immediate direct physical contact with every other ultimately-irreducible

integer of matter, the polarity (direction of the attraction) possessed by each ultimately-

irreducible integer of matter will switch from negative (attracting) to positive (repelling).

Then, each and every ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in the physical universe will

immediately repel each and every other ultimately–irreducible integer of matter. In that

moment, the Big Bang will repeat itself.

As a result of this process, adherents to this Second Paradigm Worldview believe that the

physical universe oscillates between a state of absolute mass and a state of absolute energy

(repeatedly entering into an entirely inchoate state immediately after reaching each state of

total energy) eternally, generating two generations of stars, galaxies, planets, atoms, and

people during every two-stroke cycle of the universe. This is the oscillating cosmos

cosmology, distinct from the entropic (dissipating) cosmology of the First Paradigm

Worldview.

3.4.2. The Teleological Question

Is there a specific direction in which our physical universe is unfolding? If there is, what

is the role of our human species, if any, in this unfolding?

While the adherents of the First Paradigm Worldview believe that the human species is

basically barbaric, territorial, predatory, carnivorous, and selfish (as long as each individual

being remains entirely unguided by any referent at all within his or her direct physical

experience), adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that a specific teleology

manifests itself within each generation of mass and energy generated within each cycle of our

universe. This teleology is the directional disintegration of mass into energy and the

directional integration of energy into mass (depending upon which specific direction one finds

oneself in: either an expanding or collapsing teleology within a given cycle of the universe).

Thus, adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview hold the belief that an individual human

being is able to detect a specific teleology operating on the grand scale of the universe,

moving from a contracted state to an expanded state (i.e. toward energy, during an expansive

generation of the universe), or from an expanded (energy) state to a contracted (massive)

state, depending upon which of the two alternative directions of the universe one is in the

midst of within one given cycle of the universe.

However, the teleological belief of adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview is complete

determinism. That is, adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that every action

in the entire history of any given cycle (every action that takes place during the period of time

demarked by one full expansion, starting with a Big Bang, passing through one full expansion

and then collapsing back into one full contraction up to the moment preceding the switching

44

of the polarity within that contracted universe) of the physical universe is totally and

completely determined by the physical laws of matter.[2]

3.4.3. The Ontological Question

How did sentient consciousness come into being (especially human consciousness)?

Pursuant to this worldview, the manifestation of consciousness occurs as an entirely

predictable and naturally-occurring function of the physical universe twice during every two-

phase cycle of the oscillation of the universe. Thus, according to the ontological belief of

adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview, the manifestation of consciousness is not a

random event. It is, indeed, an entirely predictable organic event within each cycle of the

universe.

To adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview, there needs to be no question of why, as in,

“Why is this repeated event of consciousness is occurring?” It simply does, but it does so

predictably and in accordance with a specific pattern. Indeed, it is this discerned pattern of the

occurrence and recurrence of consciousness—of human consciousness within the cycles of

the physical universe (like the cycle of the seasons on Earth)—which provides meaning in the

universe.

Thereby, adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview differ in their most profound beliefs

from adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview, not only as to their cosmological belief, but

also as to their ontological belief.

Thus, the arising of consciousness within the repeated cycling of the physical universe is right

in the sense that it is correct or meaningful given the pattern which is supposed to unfold

during each phase of the physical universe.

3.4.4. The Epistemological Question

What are the means by which we as human beings are capable of discerning the facts

that constitute the answer to ultimate cosmic questions such as these?

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that a human being is capable of

discerning (beneath and behind the otherwise inherently chaotic and entirely random

cosmology, which adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview actually perceive) a dialectical

order to the physical universe—an oscillation between opposites, which lends meaning to

human life.[3]

While adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview experience no single unitive

phenomenon which functions within our physical universe to bond every

ultimatelyirreducible integer of matter into a one single harmonious whole[4], adherents to the

Second Paradigm Worldview do hold a belief that each human being, through the function of

the mind (i.e., the exercise of our human intellect[5]), can come to know that the physical

universe oscillates between these two alternative physical states.

This is, indeed, an intellectual extrapolation of the most basic of all human experiences: The

experience of the separateness of each individuated human psyche from the rest of the

45

physical universe.[5] This experience of alienation from the ultimate otherness of the rest of

the physical universe is, indeed, the opposite of the experience of self-consciousness. Intrinsic

to the experience of one’s self, as separate and apart from the rest of the physical universe, is

the experience of the otherness of the physical universe from one’s self. The evolution of our

faculty of the intellect (i.e., the ability to distinguish) is the very source of our self-

consciousness.

If we project this most-deeply and most-intimately experience of all human experiences,

which is at the very core of our being, out onto the physical universe, we can experience—at

the very core of our intellect—the fact that our physical universe oscillates in this exact

manner—from a state of absolute energy to a state of absolute mass and back again. Working

intellectually from this core insight, adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview (led by

Hegel) have come to the epistemological conclusion that there is an additional faculty by

means of which each human being is able to experience the physical universe so as to derive

this essential additional data about the universe, which differentiates adherents of the Second

Paradigm Worldview from adherents of the First Paradigm Worldview as to their

epistemological belief, as well as their cosmological and their ontological beliefs.

3.4.5. Mode of Ethical Reasoning

As a result of this specific epistemological belief on the part of adherents to the Second

Paradigm Worldview, adherents believe that, while every person is capable of articulating his

or her own thesis as to what is real and true and is, therefore, capable of asserting his or her

thesis as to what the facts are pertaining to any given matter, this thesis will then take its place

in the market place of ideas and, since this thesis is only relative, other persons (having a

different perspective based upon their different life experiences and different location in

relationship to the facts) will generate an antithesis, asserting that the facts are different than

those asserted by the proponent of the thesis.

As a result of the dynamic generated by the bipolar expansion and contraction of the physical

universe, this thesis and antithesis will struggle in contention with one another and, being only

relatively or partially true, each will burn away that portion of the other’s thesis which is not

true, generating a synthesis made up of the more truthful portion of each thesis. This synthesis

will then become the new operative thesis, which will take the field in the market place of

ideas, asserting its contention as to what the facts are pertaining to the matter at hand.

It must be understood that truth will never be known to any degree of absolute certainty by

simple human beings. However, through this dialectical process of struggle between

sequential theses and antitheses, converting into synthesis and a new thesis and antithesis, our

human family will struggle toward the truth concerning facts.

The above-described dialectical process, characterized by the struggle between a relative

thesis and an opposing antithesis, is the mode of ethical reasoning through which human

46

beings will progress toward that which is right. Right is not to be obtained through the mere

imposition of an arbitrary assertion of fact by the most powerful—as occurs pursuant to the

First Paradigm Worldview—but rather, through legitimate struggle, pursuant to which the

relatively superior thesis will prevail, leading our human family toward relative truth. This

mode of ethical reasoning is the utilization of the dialectical method

Thus, given the perpetually oscillating cosmology and the predetermined teleology of the

physical universe, the only realistic mode of ethical reasoning that could logically be adopted

by one who adheres to the dialectical Second Paradigm Worldview would be to yield to the

physical tropism of joining one side or the other of whatever dialectic one is physically cast

into by the physical universe or which is physically presented to one by the physical universe.

Thus, adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview are intensely fatalistic. That is, they

accept, indeed, they actively and enthusiastically embrace, whatever the local dialectic

happens to be at their time of birth. Indeed, they internalize the bona fides of their local

community’s dialectic and become champions of the specific opinion they were born into.

This is, indeed, the very mechanism of their mode of ethical reasoning. Thus, any and all

choices are governed by the simple principle: Which action best serves my side in the

dialectical struggle in which my family, my community, or my tribe is engaged with the

ultimate other?

3.5. The Third Paradigm Worldview

Adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview hold the cosmological belief that our universe

has always existed. However, adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview believe that the

specific physical form that our physical universe will take on, in any given cycle of its

physical manifestation, is the result of the three-way interplay among energy, mass, and mind.

Adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview therefore believe that consciousness, energy, and

mass are eternal.

Like adherents to the First and Second Paradigm Worldviews, adherents to the Third

Paradigm Worldview recognize that all matter that becomes physically manifested at the

beginning of time (within each cycle of the universe) is expanding out and away from every

other piece of matter. Adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview (along with the First and

Second Paradigm Worldviews) also believe that every complex combination of matter that is

more complex than the smallest, and, therefore, ultimately indivisible unit of matter, is also

disintegrating into their smaller constituent, ultimately-indivisible units of matter.

Furthermore, as with adherents to the First and Second Paradigm Worldviews, adherents to

the Third Paradigm Worldview believe that each and every ultimately-irreducible integer of

matter in our physical universe is, at the same time, repelling itself out and away from every

other such ultimately-irreducible integer of matter. However, while adherents to the First

Paradigm Worldview believe that this expansion and disintegration of all matter in our

physical universe will inevitably continue to go on forever until our universe disintegrates into

47

nothingness; and adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that, at the moment in

time at which every single ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in the entire physical

universe stands separate and apart from every other such integer of matter in our entire

physical universe, the expansion of our physical universe will inevitably stop expanding out

and away from the original manifestation of matter, stopping our physical universe from

ultimately disintegrating into nothingness and that, after stopping its expansion and

disintegration, our physical universe will stand in a state of equipoise and inevitably begin to

collapse back in upon itself, thereupon reconstituting itself back into singularities, waves of

energy, particles of mass, etc., all the way back into planets, stars, solar systems, star clusters,

galaxies, nebulae, etc.; very crucially, adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview believe

that neither of these two alternatively-proposed realities are inevitable or predetermined facts.

Instead, adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview believe that whether our physical

universe will expand forever out into nothingness or ultimately stop and collapse back in upon

itself, creating a new cycle of physical existence is strictly the function of an existential

choice that must be made every day by each human being by either lending the power of our

minds directly to holding our physical universe together through an exercise of our existential

hope followed by our existential actions taken in accordance with that existential hope, or by

lending the power of our minds directly to the ultimate disintegration of our physical universe

through embracing despair and engaging in individual and collective human conduct every

day, giving effect to such despair.

Adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview adhere to the ontological belief that human

consciousness is an absolute preexisting partner in the eternal interplay between mass and

energy in our physical universe. However, adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview do not

attribute any metaphysical or psychic power to this activity on the part of our human mind.

Rather, adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview believe that human actions, taken as a

result of existential, intellectual decisions made within our mind in the aggregate, can affect

the material universe, but only through strictly rational and physical actions to physically

effect our existential choices.

Martin Heidegger has clearly articulated this ontological belief on the part of adherents to the

Third Paradigm Worldview in such works as Being and Time (1930) and theIntroduction to

Metaphysics (1953).

The epistemology and theory of human psychology generated by the Third Paradigm

Worldview is strictly sensory and intellectual. That is, adherents to the Third Paradigm

Worldview hold the epistemological belief that human beings have access to a greater truth

than that which we can experientially obtain from the total composite of raw materialist data

directly physically experienced through our own five senses because they believe that human

beings have an additional ability, through the exercise of our human mind (intellect), to

discern patterns within the data that we can then physically discern through the exercise of our

five senses, and which we can then project to intellectually determine a range of possible

alternative realities that constitute real data pertaining to the real world that lies beyond the

direct reach of our five physical senses.

48

Indeed, adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview hold the belief that the function of the

human mind, while, indeed, an entirely material activity, is more than a random function of

the interplay of physical forces in a random universe. They believe, instead, that human

beings are capable, through the exercise of our mind, to make existential choices governing

our moment-to-moment conduct, and that our existential conduct can constructively alter the

otherwise strictly predetermined dialectical or chaotic pattern. Our physical universe would

then radiate from each juncture of individual human decision, thereby providing to us an

existential psychology—a much more satisfying psychological state of mind than being either

mere flotsam of random consciousness in an entirely chaotic physical universe, as adherents

to the First Paradigm Worldview believe us to be, or as mere slaves to an entirely physically

predetermined, eternally-repeating, dialectical existence, as adherents to the Second Paradigm

Worldview believe us to be. This existential psychology is most clearly explained by Swiss

psychologist Ludwig Binswanger in a school of psychology known as Daseinsanalyse,

described in The Foundations and Cognition of Human Existence (1942).

In its lower manifestation, the Third Paradigm Worldview generates the existential mode of

ethical reasoning of John-Paul Sartre. Pursuant to this mode of ethical reasoning, a human

being, faced with the otherwise entirely meaningless world of chaos of the First Worldview or

with the only slightly less meaningless world of a rigid, materialistic, pre-determined,

perpetually recycling, dialectical reality, one basically makes a heroic choice of choosing to

engage in the form of human conduct that one would choose if human life were of supreme

value. This philosophy of existentialism dictates that human beings, invested with intellect

(intellectus—the ability to distinguish the difference between), are capable of choosing to act

as if they possessed free will (the ability to act differently from a form of action that is

imposed upon us by the otherwise predetermined physical laws of the universe).

This philosophy is, at the same time, both heroic and foolish because existentialism is rooted

in an absolute conviction that human beings have no ability to know what absolute reality is.

We are therefore necessarily without any absolute referent in accordance with which to make

absolutely certain normative (norm-driven) choices or judgments. Thus, according to this

philosophy, all judgments made by inherently ignorant human beings must be ultimately

arbitrary. However, rather than have such choices be meaningless as well as arbitrary,

adherents to the lower manifestation of the Third Paradigm Worldview make choices as if

each individual human life were of absolute value and possessing free will (see, e.g. Being

and Nothingness (1956) and Existentialism and Humanism (1948).

The mode of spiritual expression of adherents to the lower manifestation of the Third

Paradigm is Judaism, projecting Yahweh God onto reality as an existential function of the

mind.

In its social form, the Third Paradigm Worldview manifests itself, in its lower manifestation,

in the form of the nation state, such as the nation state of Israel, the nation state of The United

States, or the nation state of Sweden.

49

In its higher manifestation, the Third Paradigm Worldview generates the mode of ethical

reasoning of Immanuel Kant. Pursuant to Kant’s higher Third Paradigm mode of ethical

reasoning, one will be able to:

Discern, through an exercise of one’s mind, the arithmetic, geometric, exponential, or

algorithmic pattern that exists within the physical data that one experientially perceives

directly through the exercise of one’s five physical senses.

Project this pattern out into a realm of intellectually-perceived potential realities, beyond

the reach of one’s five physical senses. By this means, one ascertains the structure of

several potential, alternative, existential realities, each of which could logically flow

directly from this pattern discerned through the mind.

Make an existential choice to comport one’s personal conduct in accordance with one

(among several) of the projected realities, which action comports with one of the

intellectually-possible realities.

Existentially engage in that chosen form of conduct so as to impose upon an otherwise

chaotic or materially predetermined recycling world, one’s mindful, meaningful order and

direction (see e.g., Kant’s Phenomenology of Mind: The Science of The Experience of

Consciousness, 1807, and Naturrecht und Staatswissenshaft im Grundrisse, 1821).

Furthermore, the higher manifestation of the Third Paradigm Worldview is characterized by:

A denial of the ability of an individual to be able to obtain access to ultimate reality

through any combination of his or her five physical senses or through any act of sensuous

intuition

The rejection of any sharp division between faith and knowledge or between imagination

and understanding

The championing of the exercise of mind as the means by which one is able to discern

patterns within the physical data obtained from the universe through an exercise of one’s

five physical senses, and by means of which one is able to project these patterns out into a

realm not directly accessible to our five physical senses so as to be able to intellectually

intuit reality beyond that which could be directly experientially accessed through our five

senses

The belief that human beings can, through our actions, guided by mind, impose a direct

effect upon an otherwise chaotic or dialectically predetermined physical universe

The mode of spiritual expression of adherents to the higher manifestation of the Third

Paradigm is Hebrew Cabalism.

In its higher manifestation, the Third Paradigm Worldview has expressed itself in the social

form of Zion, the mythical nation state governed by the wise King Solomon and a Council of

Cabalists.

50

[1] That is research conducted by undertaking an analysis of the disparate data gathered in the

field, and then discerning a developing pattern which that raw data generates.

[2] See below a discussion of how this pure speculative reason functions as an additional

epistemological source of human knowledge acquired from a source beyond the physical

sense experience at pp. 149-150.

[3] We will discuss this epistemological assumption of the adherents to the Third Paradigm

Worldview under the topic of epistemology.

[4] See the above discussion of cosmology for Immanuel Kant’s description of this unique

faculty of mind.

PILLARS OF BELIEF:

3.5.1. The Cosmological Question

How did our physical universe first come into being, and what are the physical laws that

govern its past, present, and future functioning?

Adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe that we live in an inherently chaotic and

entirely random (and therefore meaningless) universe. Adherents to the Second Paradigm

Worldview believe that we live in a perpetually oscillating universe in which all actions are

totally predetermined by purely mechanical physical forces. This oscillating dialectic dynamic

of the second paradigm lends a clear mechanical dialectical dynamic which constitutes at least

some meaning or direction in which one can act, though only in response to some purely

physical predetermined tropism, to an otherwise entirely chaotic and meaningless universe. In

contrast, adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview hold the cosmological belief that an

individual, through the exercise of mind, is able to modify the otherwise rigidly-absolute

mechanical dialectical cosmology of the Second Paradigm Worldview, and the otherwise

entirely chaotic cosmology of the First Paradigm Worldview.

Adherents to the Third Paradigm (Right Middle-Marginalist) Worldview hold the

cosmological belief that, through an exercise of mind, each individual human being can

existentially escape from this predetermined or utterly chaotic physical universe, although the

purely physical universe always exists outside of the human mind. The exercise of the human

mind in such a way enables each human being to make choices as though he or she were free.

According to Immanuel Kant, while unavoidably and unalterably conditioned by his or her

physically predetermined talents, specific cultural conditioning, unique personal experiences,

and uniquely conditioned perspective on reality, each human being still possesses some

degree of human freedom from these preconditions to enable each such person to choose

relatively freely between alternative choices, even if those choices are limited by one’s

culture, historical time period, and experiences.

The nature of this peculiar degree of freedom is discussed by Kant in his Critique of Judgment

in which he argues (somewhat unconvincingly to some) that an individual human being is

capable of making comparative discernments between what he terms comparative magnum

51

and absolute magnum, the former being capable of being discerned through a sensible

experience, but the latter being capable of being discerned through a concept of pure reason,

which conducts the notion of nature to “a supersensible substrate (which lies at its basis and

also at the basis of our faculty of thought). As this, however, is great beyond all standards of

sense, it makes us judge as sublime not so much the object, as our own state of mind in the

estimation of it.” (Kant, § 26)

At one point, Kant warns his followers to beware of supposing that the absolute and even the

comparative better is nothing more than an idea which might more effectively direct and

regulate our purely rational search for empirical knowledge. However, at another point in the

Preface of the Critique of Practical Reason (1788), Kant asserts that he succeeded in showing

that the reality of an unconditioned cause—hence a source of human freedom—could be

proved by means of an apodictic law of practical reason, thereby constituting the keystone of

an entire edifice of a system of pure (though speculative) reason.[2]

While subject to objection—even rejection—by adherents to other worldviews, this postulate

categorically distinguishes the cosmology of adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview

from the cosmology of adherents to the First and Second Paradigm Worldviews.

3.5.2. The Teleological Question

Is there a specific direction in which our physical universe is unfolding? If there is, what

is the role of our human species, if any, in this unfolding?

The unique cosmological belief of adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview generates an

equally unique teleological belief. Looking out upon the otherwise chaotic or purely random

universe of the First Paradigm and the physically predetermined universe of the Second

Paradigm, adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview look over these two different concepts

and tell themselves that, while we as human beings possess no biological means of which we

can, to an absolute degree of certainty[3], sense what reality is absolutely true, we are capable

of choosing (by an exercise of our unique mind[4]) which reality we can mathematically

project as being potentially real. In addition, we are then capable of existentially choosing to

comport our human conduct in accordance with the projected reality rather than remaining a

mere unwilling object, subject to the purely mechanical, predetermined mandates of the

physical universe (either in the form of the chaotic mandates of the universe of the First

Paradigm or in the form of the mechanically, predetermined dialectical mandate of the the

Second Paradigm.)

Through such an act of the assertion of our existential mind, adherents to the Third Paradigm

Worldview believe that we can assert a certain degree of existential human freedom—

although, since it is impossible to escape from our preconditioned state of physical

experience, we must make these choices existentially—knowing that we cannot ever get

outside of our physical conditioning to know, to an absolute certainty, what is actually the

truth.

52

The insertion of this added factor of human freedom and choice on the part of adherents to the

Third Paradigm Worldview adds a new dimension of direction to the physical universe, thus,

changing its otherwise chaotic or dialectical and predetermined teleology.

The teleological belief of the Third Paradigm Worldview—our ability to choose a consistent,

rationally-projected reality enables us to live as though our projected (chosen) reality were

true—is distinguished from the teleological beliefs the First and Second Worldviews.

3.5.3. The Ontological Question

How did sentient consciousness come into being (especially human consciousness)?

Adherents to the First Paradigm Worldview believe that consciousness is a randomly-

occurring, material epiphenomenon of the entirely chaotic interplay between mass and energy

in a chaotic material universe.

Adherents to the Second Paradigm Worldview believe that consciousness is an entirely

predetermined mechanical function of the mechanically-determined physical expansion and

physical contraction of the universe, like physical sparks thrown up by the mechanical

grinding together of two metal balls.

Adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview, on the other hand, believe that because they are

capable of accessing a dimension of realty through pure reason, which was not created by the

physical universe, but was instead, created by the mind that there exists a dimension of reality

which has no material existence, but does exist although we have no access while in our

material incarnation, except through mind and then, only as a non-material concept. Since the

human mind appears to have been generated by the physical interaction between purely

physical mass and purely physical energy, it is reasonable to conclude, as a function of pure

reason, that this field of mind (to which we have access purely as a concept through pure

reason) was also generated by the purely physical interaction of all of the mass and energy in

the entire physical universe which has no physical location but is generated by the physical

universe—like our mind is generated by our brain.

However, this phenomenon is not physical. It is not part of the cosmology of adherents of the

Third Paradigm. It is, instead, a concept of the mind of our human family, which we know to

be true through pure reason alone, but to which we have no intellectual or physical access in

our material (conditioned) state as human beings. Thus, this super mind is an ontological not a

cosmological phenomenon.

3.5.4. The Epistemological Question

What are the means by which we as human beings are capable of discerning the “facts”

that constitute the answer to ultimate cosmic questions such as these?

Believing in the power of mind as the foundation of some degree of free will, adherents to the

Third Paradigm Worldview believe that human beings have developed the ability to

53

determine facts beyond the reach of five physical senses—not through access to some as of

yet scientifically unidentified sixth biological human physical sense, nor through some direct

access to a spiritual being beyond the boundaries of the physical universe to which we have

no access in our conditioned material state—but instead through the power of our rational

mind or intellect.

One such exercise of our human intellectual mind is mathematics, by means of which human

beings are capable of, first, discerning patterns, which exist within the material plane we have

direct physical access to through our five physical senses. Secondly, in identifying the

mathematical formula, which exists within this observed physical pattern. Lastly,

arithmetically extrapolating the formula that is mentally beyond our material physical senses

so we can, thereby, determine, through an exercise of mind, additional dimensions of reality,

which exists beyond the capability of our direct physical senses, which, in fact, need no

material existence.

Adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview believe that human beings can do this same

thing in the area of human ideas, specifically, intellectually discerning the pattern within a

given human idea, and then, by intellectually projecting or extrapolating that idea beyond the

realm in which we can presently directly experience it. Again, through the exercise of mind,

we can access realms of knowledge that we could not otherwise access were we to remain

bound to the physical three-dimensional world through our five physical senses.

Drawing upon data obtained from within such a realm of mind, adherents to the Third

Paradigm Worldview hold the epistemological belief that human beings are capable of

making intellectual choices, which would not be otherwise available through the materially-

determined physical world of our five physical senses.

The ability of our species to impose choices upon the otherwise physically predetermined

world, choices made based upon data discerned from within an intellectually-accessed realm,

which exists beyond the three-dimensional world, constitutes an additional epistemological

source of data which is available to adherents to the Third Paradigm Worldview on the basis

of which they can make their choices in the physical world.

This is, therefore, a distinctive epistemological belief of adherents to the Third Paradigm

Worldview.

3.5.5 Mode of Ethical Reasoning

Because of this unique epistemological belief on the part of the Third Paradigm Worldview,

adherents employ an equally unique mode of ethical reasoning. The mode of ethical reasoning

of the Second Paradigm Worldview is rigidly dialectical, and the mode of ethical reasoning of

the First Paradigm Worldview, employing a consistent mode of ethical reasoning, which,

when faced with a number of alternative action choices to respond to a given problem, will

always choose the action which merely maximizes the personal degree of short-term physical

pleasure and/or minimizes the personal degree of immediate physical pain.

54

The unique mode of ethical reasoning of the Third Paradigm (Right Middle-Marginalist)

Worldview is that, when confronted with a number of optional actions to respond to a given

problem will, first, choose which reality they can rationally project into the future to be

potentially (arithmetically) true, and they then choose to engage in, or endorse as better, that

particular action which will maximize that reality as though that reality were real.

This is an existential mode of ethical reasoning or mode of ethical reasoning that is directed

toward making the world into one in which the adherent to the Third Paradigm Worldview

can rationally project as being potentially existent.

3.6. The Fourth Paradigm Worldview Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological belief that our physical

universe might have begun as the result of the Big Bang, as is believed by adherents to The

First Paradigm Worldview. On the other hand, adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview

believe that our physical universe might have begun as a result of the manifestation of two

“singularities” within the theretofore entirely homogeneous “Void,” as is believed by

adherents to The Second Paradigm Worldview – and that all of the other incremental steps

might have occurred just as they are believed to have occurred by adherents to The Second

Paradigm Worldview, strictly as a matter of pure physical forces. Adherents to The Fourth

Paradigm Worldview also believe that our physical universe might have begun as it is

believed to have begun by adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview, as a function of the

inter-play of “Energy”, “Mass” and “Mind.”

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview believe, simply, that the three conclusions

about the historical origin of the Universe which are firmly held by adherents to The First

Paradigm Worldview, The Second Paradigm Worldview and The Third Paradigm Worldview

constitute three merely different hypothesis as to how our physical universe might have

originated. However, adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview are strict empiricists, so

they are, therefore, willing to positively affirm only those portions of any one of these (or

other) hypothesis as can be positively confirmed through the compilation and analysis of

physical data which they can measure, weigh, taste, touch, smell, see or hear (though

adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview DO allow their five physical “senses” to be

“magnified” or “extended” through mechanical technology). Adherents to The Fourth

Paradigm Worldview are willing solely to hypothesize as to further aspects of any thesis

beyond the limited physical data which can be confirmed by physical means. And they will

remain open to altering their hypothesis as to how the physical universe came into being to

accord with their future acquisition of any further measurable data. For adherents to The

Fourth Paradigm Worldview are “Scientific Logical Positivists.” Their “Reality” is made up

only of “facts” which they can “prove.” And they deem as having been “proved” only those

“facts” which can be confirmed through means of physical measurement.

Thus, the Cosmology of adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview is a purely physical

Cosmology. Indeed, nothing else is deemed to exist.

55

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview, like adherents to The First Paradigm

Worldview, like adherents to The Second Paradigm Worldview and like adherents to The

Third Paradigm Worldview, recognize that all “matter” which was created at “The Beginning

of Time” (whether this be a de novo “beginning” or simply the beginning of a newcycle of the

universe) is expanding, and they, too, believe that every combination of matter more complex

than the smallest unit of “matter,” are disintegrating (into their smaller constituent, ultimately

NON-divisible units of matter.) And adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview believe,

further, as do adherents to The First, Second and Third Paradigm Worldviews, that every

ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in our physical universe is, at the same time, repelling

itself out and away from every other such integer of matter in our physical universe. They

believe that all three of these phenomena are taking place – because they can observe and

measure all three of these physical phenomena.

However, while adherents to The First Paradigm Worldview believe that this

contemporaneously-occurring expansion and dis-integration of all matter in our physical

universe has been going on since the very beginning of our physical universe, and that this

contemporaneously-occurring expansion and disintegration will continue to go on forever

causing our physical universe, inevitably to dis-integrate into nothingness; while adherents to

The Second Paradigm Worldview believe that this expansion of our physical universe will

STOP and then begin to collapse back in upon itself, thereupon reconstituting itself back into

complex combinations (waves of energy; particles ofmass etc. re-form planets; stars; solar

systems; star clusters; “galaxies”; “nebulae” etc.) and while adherents to The Third Paradigm

Worldview believe that neither of these two alternative options is a pre-determined fact but,

rather, that whether our physical universe will expand forever or will ultimately stop and

collapse back in upon itself is the function of an existential choice which is being made every

day by individual human beings by our either lending the power of our mind to the holding of

the universetogether through an exercise of our existential hope combined with our existential

actions taken in accordance with that hope, or our lending the power of our mind to the

ultimate disintegration of our universe through our embracing of despair and our then

engaging in conduct every day that gives this despair effect – adherents to The Fourth

Paradigm Worldview believe that any one of these three alternative hypotheses might well be

true – OR that some fourth hypothesis might just as easily be true depending entirely upon

what the most up-to-date physical data is confirms to be “true.”

In the broad field of Cosmology, adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview, therefore,

HAVE NO PRESENT FIXED BELIEF. They simply view the present amount ofphysically

confirmed data which our human family has in our collective possession to be statistically

insufficient to enable our human family to come to any fixed conclusion as to how our

physical universe came into being. The state the Cosmological belief of adherents to The

Fourth Paradigm Worldview is the result of two causes. The first is that, confined by the

present state of our scientific technology, we simply have not yet been physically able to

project our sight, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching or “measuring” undertaken by means

of our five physical senses out to the very farthest edge of the expanding universe so as to

experience the physical data which contains the secrets of the physical process which gave

rise to the origin of our physical universe. The second is that, there is a distinct possibility (i.e.

56

there is a credible specific hypothesis to the effect that) that our physical universe might

possibly have originated from some kind of entirely NON-physical (NON-material) process.

If this “Hypothesis B” turns out to be the case, then the scientific technology which is

employed by adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview – (technology which is designed

to ascertain and measure ONLY material or physical phenomena) – will have no means of

discerning, measuring, or otherwise physically detecting any NON-physical data pertaining

to, or bearing witness to the phenomena of creation until such phenomena generates one or

more physically measurable qualities (in the form of energy or mass). Therefore, the earliest

data which could discerned by adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview would be only

after its manifestation into matter has already happened. Thus, the process of the creation of

matter itself would remain a total mystery to adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview,

effectively invisible, because it exists out beyond thephysical discernment and measurement

of the technological devices developed and fielded by adherents to The Fourth Paradigm

Worldview.

Thus, if “Hypothesis B” proves to be the case, then adherents to The Fourth Paradigm

Worldview will never be able to scientifically confirm this fact. They will be able to say

nothing more than: “At one moment, nothing was there. And, the very next moment, there “it”

was (or is.) Anything more would have to remain forever a merehypothesis or a mere

intellectual surmise.

Such a Cosmological Belief would then, of course, bear a great deal of resemblance to the

Cosmological Belief that is adhered to by adherents to The First Paradigm Worldview called

the Big Bang. For that matter, this is the same Cosmological Belief that is adhered to by

adherents to The Second Paradigm Worldview – with the only slight modification that

adherents to The Second Paradigm Worldview adhere to the Cosmological Belief that, rather

than the Big Bang originating simply from nothing, it was “The First Singularity” which

simply manifested from nothing (from some NON-material dimension) and then a second

singularity (again, from the same NON-material dimension). Then, “The First Unit of Matter”

(a WAVE FUNCTION OF ENERGY consisting of one electron volt unit) simply

MANIFESTED into Material being, again, out of nothing, and so on. Nor, for that matter, do

adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview maintain that the human “MIND” is the source

of the first unit of physical “matter.” Adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview maintain,

rather, that “Mind” is a mere “Co-Partner” with “energy” and “mass” after the human

“MIND” comes into existence. Adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview simply believe

that “energy” and “mass” have ALWAYS EXISTED (in the “form” of an ever-oscillating

Universe, “oscillating” back and forth between a state of Absolute Energy and Absolute

Mass.) It simply has no “beginning.”

While adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview adhere to some aspects of the

Teleological beliefs adhered to by adherents to The First, Second and Third Paradigm

Worldviews pertaining to the laws pursuant to which physical matter within our universe

functions in between its origin and the “Moment of Ultimate Expansion,” adherents to The

Fourth Paradigm Worldview adhere to NO SPECIFIC TELEOLOGICAL BELIEF AS TO

WHETHER OUR PHYSICAL UNIVERSE IS GOING TO GO ON EXPANDING

57

FOREVER INTO NOTHINGNESS OR WHETHER IT IS GOING TO COLLAPSE BACK

IN UPON ITSELF, RECREATING THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE. Adherents to The Fourth

Paradigm Worldview maintain that our human family simply does not yet have enough of the

necessary pertinent physical data on the basis of which to make such a factual determination.

As to the Ontological Belief of adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview, adherents

believe that consciousness and human life manifest themselves within the processes of the

physical universe – but they have no present set of physical data which enables them to

determine exactly how sentient consciousness came into being out of NON- sentient matter.

So, once again, adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview possess no fixed or determined

Ontological Belief. They merely have various hypotheses.

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview – because of their lack of any specific Belief in

the fields of Cosmology, Teleology and Ontology are identified almost exclusively by the

Master Identifier of their Epistemology.

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview hold the Epistemological Belief that the only

means which are at our disposal, as human beings, by means of which we can determine

TRUTH are:

(A) the exercise of our five physical senses (reinforced by technology) and

(B) the application of our “intellect” to the physical data experientially perceived by means of

our five physical senses which has been directly given by actual physicalobjects.

Thus, like adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview, adherents to The Fourth Paradigm

explicitly agree that one can intellectually hypothesize as to possible aspects of Reality which

lie out beyond the present actual experience of our five physical senses reinforced by

technology, (even to the point of being able to project certain probableaspects of this

“Ultimate Reality”). However, unlike adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview, adherents

to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview come to NO conclusions, or even set beliefs, pertaining to

any aspect of “Reality” which has not yet been actually seen, smelled, touched, tasted, heard,

measured or weighed.

In this regard, adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview are similar to adherents to The

Third Paradigm Worldview. However, whereas, due to an overwhelming “cosmic frustration”

(or “Cosmic Angst”), adherents to The Third Paradigm Existential Worldview choose to seize

upon one specific intellectually – projected Reality as THE Reality which they wish to bring

into being (by means of their existential choice and action) and they then act on that specific

projected Reality as if it were established to be TRUE, adherents to The Fourth Paradigm

Scientific Logical Positivist Worldview refrain from seizing upon any one specific Reality

and merely project a variety of possible“hypotheses.”

When compelled to act upon an element of Reality which remains still beyond their having

measured it, adherents to the Fourth Paradigm Worldview will act in accordance with the

58

specific hypothesis which possesses the highest probability projection of being true. This is

done through the application of a process which they identify as Bayh’s Theorem. [1]

To the degree to which adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview strictly adhere to their

refusal to come to any explicit conclusion of fact beyond data which has been already seen,

heard, touched, smelled or tasted, this Epistemological Belief has come to be regarded as the

Master Identifier Belief of The Fourth Paradigm Worldview.

Thus, while adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview are quite rarely wrong because

they come to hold specific empirical beliefs on such a limited portion of Reality, adherents to

The Fourth Paradigm, conversely, often miss out on very important aspects of “Reality”…

simply because so many important aspects of genuine “Reality” presently lie out beyond

empirical physical verification, due to the insufficiencies of our present state of technology.

In its “Lower” Manifestation, the Fourth Paradigm Worldview generates the “Mode of Ethical

Reasoning” of elite Intellectual Majoritarian Utilitarianism. This is a process by means of

which a choice is made between alternative options available by a majority of those

individuals who are deemed to possess an adequately “high” level of intellectual capacity –

and the “choice” which is usually made pursuant to this Mode of Ethical Reasoning is that

choice which generates the greatest good for that intellectual “majority” (which is often

[though not always] viewed, by these elite, as providing some ancillary “utilitarian” trickle

down “benefit” to those who are intellectually-disqualified from participating in the decision-

making process.)

In its “Higher” Manifestation, the Fourth Paradigm Worldview generates the “Mode of

Ethical Reasoning” of “Majoritarian Utilitarianism” which was espoused by John Stewart

Mill. Pursuant to this “Mode of Ethical Reasoning”, every “choice” to be made is made by all

of the individuals who are going to be effected by that choice, and the “choice” which is made

pursuant to this Mode of Ethical Reasoning is that choice which will generate the greatest

good for the greatest number of those individuals who are directly effected by that choice.

Because of these combined Cosmological, “Teleological and Ontological beliefs on the part

of adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview, adherents to The Fourth Paradigm

Worldview adhere to the Philosophy of “Scientific Logical Positivism”, a Philosophy

exemplified, in its “Lower” Manifestation by ARISTOTLE.

In its “Higher” Manifestation, this Fourth Paradigm Worldview generates the philosophy of

“The Golden Rule” of “Brotherly Love” (“Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do

Unto You”) espoused by The Christian Social Teachings. This is viewed as being the truly

Utilitarian Salvation Dynamic of the human family, the dynamic of Heart-Felt Human

Affection.

59

The “Mode of Spiritual Expression” of adherents to The Fourth Paradigm is Christian. In its

“Lower” Manifestation, The Fourth Paradigm Worldview manifests itself in the Mode of

Spiritual Expression of “Medieval Catholic Logical Scholasticism.” In its “Higher”

Manifestation, The Fourth Paradigm Worldview manifests itself in the Mode of Spiritual

Expression of Thomas Aquinas in his latter days of life (Jesus & Marian Christian

Egalitarianism.)

In its “Social Form”, The Fourth Paradigm Worldview “manifests” itself, in its “Lower”

Manifestation, in the form of “Continental Federation”, such as The Christian Democratic

European Union. In its “Higher” Manifestation, The Fourth Paradigm Worldview manifests

itself in the “Social Form” of Continental Christian Social Democracy.

Many have accused Adherents to the Middle-Marginalist Worldview (located at the exact

physical “center” of Professor Talcott Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph) of simply adopting a

neutral (or “Agnostic”) position on each of the FOUR COSMIC QUESTIONS OF

ULTIMATE FACT – and of then adopting a “Mode of Ethical Reasoning” which

simplymechanically averages the positions taken by all of the other Worldviews, and

thereupon simply back engineering a mechanically reductionist lowest common

denominatorposition as an answer to each of these Four Comic Questions.

However, it is the position of Professor Parsons that Adherents to the Middle-Marginalist

position along his Sociological Bar Graph have done something MORE…and at the same

time LESS… than simply averaging out the lowest common denominator resulting from an

analysis of the answers provided to these Four Questions by the Adherents to the two

Systemic and the two Marginalist Worldviews.

Rather, Professor Parsons asserts that Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Middle Marginalist

Worldview have generated their own answers to these Four Basic Questions. These

“Answers” are, however, only Provisional Answers.

THE “PARADIGMATIC” EXEMPLIFICATION OF THE “LOWER”

MANIFESTATION OF THE FOURTH PARADIGM WORLDVIEW

MIDEAVAL SCHOLASTIC CATHOLIC CULTURE

THE “PARADIGMATIC” EXEMPLIFICATION OF THE “HIGHER”

MANIFESTATION OF THE FOURTH PARADIGM WORLDVIEW

ARISTOTLEAN GREEK CULTURE

[1] (Set forth Bahy’s Theorem.)

[2] At the present moment, this “position” seems to be that: There are numerous locations

within the physically- perceivable physical Universe where “matter” is dis-appearing into

60

“Black Holes” (into the inside of which our presently-technologically-augmented five

physical human senses cannot gain access. And there are a number of locations within our

presently-physically-perceivable physical Universe where “matter” seems to be “coming into

physical existence. And, thirdly, we have mathematically determined that there must exist a

HUGE quantity of “Dark Matter” (or “Anti-Matter”) within our physical Universe. But, at

present we cannot physically see, measure orweigh enough physical “Matter” within our

physical Universe to convince ourselves that our physical Universe is going to stop expanding

and dis-“integrating”. So, at present, we tentatively believe that our physical Universe is

heading toward “chaos.” (So, for the moment, we “in the Middle” will support those who

believe in the First Paradigm Worldview.)

[3] This specific “Mode of Ethical Reasoning” is set forth under the rubric of The Fourth

Paradigm “Mode of Ethical Reasoning.”

PILLARS OF BELIEF:

3.6.1. The Cosmological Question

How did our physical universe first come into being, and what are the physical laws that

govern its past, present, and future functioning?

While often publicly professing to believe in the classical Theist Cosmology because it is the

useful (utilitarian) thing to do in a culture in which the majority of people espouse this belief,

adherents to the MIDDLE-MARGINALIST position along Professor Parsons’ Sociological

Bar graph do not really believe in such an “Emanationist” Cosmology in which:

(A) Every point of “space” outside of the physical boundaries of our physical universe is filled

by an infinite & eternal sea of undifferentiated Consciousness;

(B) This Consciousness also pervades every unit of “matter” within the physical Universe;

(C) The infinite & eternal sea of undifferentiated consciousness can alter our universe’s

natural laws of physical science in response to “prayers”; and

(D) Every single human being is capable of achieving direct conscious access to the infinite &

eternal sea of undifferentiated consciousness through the act of “prayer.”

However, they are not certain that something like this is NOT going on - even if they cannot

rationally determine what the “something” is.

Conversely, Adherents of the MIDDLE-Marginalist position are NOT entirely convinced that

every single ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in the physical Universe is simply

expanding out-and-away from every other such integer of matter in the Universe into ultimate

nothingness resulting in there being no meaning whatsoever to any act other than insofar as

that act generates the most immediate short-term material physical gratification of the

biological needs of one’s own personal self and one’s own immediate family.

61

However, Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview suspect that this might be true –

even if they do not wish to admit this to themselves – or to the public.

Therefore, Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Middle-Marginalist Worldview do not stand

with those who take (what the Middle-Marginalists perceive to be) such “IDEOLOGICAL”,

or “Extreme”, positions on these Four Cosmic Questions of Ultimate Fact and adopt, in

practice, a merely provisional position on the “Cosmological” Question as to the existence of,

or non-existence of this “Infinite & Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness” which is

the source of the physical Universe – as well as refraining from taking any fixed position as to

the Answer to any of the other three Cosmic Questions which might provide them with a

consistent “Worldview.”

INSTEAD OF believing in, or attempting to comport their conduct in accordance with, any

specific “Cosmological” Belief – Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm “Middle-Marginalist”

Worldview operationally adopt whatever THEORY is PRESENTLY supported by the latest

scientific data ascertained solely by our five human senses (amplified or enhanced by our

human technology) and then processed though our human intellect. This conduct generates a

position on the issue of Cosmology which is fundamentally different from simply averaging

the data provided by the Cosmological Answers espoused by the two Systemic Worldviews

and the two Marginalist Worldviews.

Thus, Adherents to The Middle Marginalist Worldview believe in a Cosmology which is the

product of the data gathered solely through an exercise of their five commonly-acknowledged

physical senses and extrapolated by their Intellect. However, such intellectual extrapolation

generates a model of what the physical is beyond that which they can actually see, touch,

taste, feel or smell (enhanced by technology). So, Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm

Worldview do NOT take any position other than an entirely theoretical position as to the

Cosmology of our physical Universe beyond that portion of the Universe which has been

“proven” by scientifically – verifiable means (meaning that data which can be confirmed by

our five human biological senses enhanced by scientifically accepted means of physical

technology).

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm relegate all study outside the known universe to theoretical

sciences. This position on the part of Adherents to the MIDDLE- Marginalist position along

Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph causes Adherents to this Middle-Marginalist

Worldview to be comparatively UNGROUNDED, un-linked to any truly Cosmic referent ,

thus, very much without any over-arching consistent moral and ethical framework.

3.6.2. The Teleological Question

Is there a specific direction in which our physical universe is unfolding, and if there is,

what is the role of our human species, if any, in this unfolding?

Adherents of the Middle-Marginalist position are not wedded to the Right-Systemist position

that human beings are essentially the same as we have been for hundreds of thousands of

62

years: territorial, predatory, selfish, violent, untrustworthy, etc and that our species is

essentially unalterable in this regard.

Nor, however, do Adherents to The Middle Marginalist Worldview believe in the Left-

Systemist position that there is some natural phenomenon at work from outside of the

physical Universe which is operating within the physical Universe which will naturally evolve

our human species into a more and more “perfect” status, both biologically or ethically.

Adherents to this Middle-Marginalist position DO, however, believe that individual human

beings can, through the exercise of their intellect, improve the lot into which they were born –

so long as one does not form any firm beliefs based strictly upon intellectually – projected

theories beyond those which can be confirmed through direct observation by means of one’s

five physical human senses.

Thus, Adherents of this position are vigorous in their advocacy of education and the making

educational opportunities available to ALL persons - regardless of those persons’ race, ethnic

background, class or place of national origin. But, this educational opportunity must train

persons who receive such education to restrain their beliefs strictly to those which are rational

and scientifically verified. This, indeed, is an absolutely essential aspect of the education to

which Fourth Paradigm Worldview Adherents believe that every person should be entitled…

indeed, should be legally-compelled to be subjected to… in order to make the world a strictly

rational place.

Pursuant to such an education, Adherents to The Middle Marginalist Worldview believe that

we, as human beings, can influence the teleology of our physical Universe by inserting our

rational conduct into the physical Universe to alter the otherwise natural physical events of

the Universe which are otherwise governed by the physical laws of science. The criteria to

determine what human action we will insert into the otherwise natural “Teleology” of the

physical Universe are, by an Adherent to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview, strictly rational

actions in accordance with the Mode of Ethical Reasoning which is generated by a strictly

rational judgment.[3]

3.6.3. The Ontological Question

How did sentient consciousness come into being (especially human consciousness)?

Aristotle represents the Philosopher of The Fourth Paradigm Worldview. Aristotle’s

discussion of perception overlaps with two contemporary debates about consciousness: the

first over whether consciousness is an intrinsic feature of mental states or a higher-order

manifestation of which we are merely vessels; the second concerning the qualitative nature of

experience. In both cases, Aristotle’s views cut down the middle of an apparent dichotomy, in

a way that does justice to each set of intuitions, while avoiding their attendant difficulties.

With regard to the first issue he argues that consciousness is both intrinsic and higher-order,

due to its reflexive nature. This, in turn, has consequences for the second issue, where again

Aristotle seeks out the middle ground. He is committed against qualia in any strong sense of

63

the term. Yet he also holds that the phenomenal quality of experience is not exhausted by its

representational content.

3.6.4. The Epistemological Question

What are the means by which we as human beings are capable of discerning the “facts”

that constitute the answer to ultimate cosmic questions such as these?

Adherents of the Middle-Marginalist position, like persons who are located on the right side

of Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph are dis-inclined to believe that there is any

method by means of which we, as human beings, can determine any Absolute Truth.

However, unlike the Adherents of the Right-Systemist and Right- Marginalist positions on the

Bar Graph, Adherents of the Middle- Marginalist position will NOT maintain that THERE IS

NO TRUTH OR REALITY (which would mean that we are free to conduct ourselves as

though there were NO TRUTH or that we are free simply to blindly give ourselves over to

some purely mechanical dialectic.)

Like persons who are located on the left side of Professor Parsons’ Bar graph, Adherents of

the Middle-Marginalist position along the Bar Graph are inclined to go searching for THE

Truth (with an expectation that “IT” exists out there somewhere). Thus, Adherents of the

Middle-Marginalists position along the Bar Graph endorse the utilitarian tactic of a dialectical

methodology for searching out the Truth (more accurately, perhaps, “groping toward” the

truth). However, Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview do not grant to this

dialectical process an end-game ULTIMATE value (as do Right-Marginialist Dialecticians).

Instead, Adherents to the Middle-Marginalist position on the Bar Graph remain ready and

willing to adjust the truth generated by an attachment to the outcome of a purely dialectical

process to accord with new physically-verifiable scientific data. In the meantime, Adherents

to this Fourth Paradigm Middle Marginalist Worldview are always willing accept a less-than-

perfect “truth” to accommodate the pragmatic needs of the moment at which “truth” needs to

be determined.

In order to determine this presently-operative Truth, Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm

Worldview engage in the intellectual process of “Scientific Logical Positivism” to determine

“The Facts.” They systematically gather scientific data, then subject this data to their human

intellect, discerning patterns within this data. They then project out (arithmetically,

geometrically, algorithmically and through calculus) this data to determine how these strictly

physical patterns might project themselves out into the physical realm beyond the parameters

in which we, as human beings, can presently physically discern the presence of these physical

phenomena.

BUT, Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Scientific Logical Positivist Worldview confine this

intellectual extrapolation strictly to the realm of theory, and they confine their beliefs strictly

to that portion of the totality of Reality to which they can gain direct physical access through

their five physical biological senses (enhanced by scientifically-verified technology.) Because

of this, Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview explicitly and expressly acknowledge

64

that they do NOT “know” everything. Indeed, they expressly acknowledge that, even that

which they profess to “know” is strictly provisional… that is subject to change. All

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview stand ready to amend what they “know” by

adjusting their knowledge to accommodate new discoveries made through the process of

Scientific Logical Positivist physical research.

Thus, Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview are consistently tentative about their

beliefs, causing every one of their existent Physical World beliefs to be contingent upon the

acquisition of new data and causing every one of their Cosmic Beliefs to be strictly

theoretical.

3.6.5. Mode of Ethical Reasoning

When faced with a number of choices from amongst which to select, an Adherent to the

Middle-Marginalist position will always select that choice which generates “the greatest good

for the greatest number,” the classical Utilitarian choice. They are not ideological. They are

pragmatic … almost mathematic in their ethical decision-making.

They do not attach metaphysical values to data. They are strictly rational. They are the

Mentants of Frank Herbert’s DUNE. They are the Dr. Spocks of Gene Rodenberry’s STAR

TREK.

3.7. The Fifth Paradigm Worldview

The defining and distinguishing belief of the “Liberal” Fifth Paradigm Worldview is the fact

that The Liberal Worldview is the first of the “Worldviews” (moving from the “Right” to the

“Left” along Professor Talcott Parson’s Sociological Bar Graph) which actually

acknowledges thebona fides of the “Intuitive” human experience. However, Adherents to the

merely “Liberal” Worldview grant to this “Intuitive” Experience nothing more than a merely

ancillary – or supplemental – role in the ethical decision-making process of our human family.

This belief in the bona fides of the “Intuitive” human experience as a legitimate category of

experience is the distinctive feature of the Epistemological Belief system of adherents to the

“Liberal” Worldview which distinguishes the Epistemological Belief from the

Epistemological Beliefs of the Adherents to all of the Worldviews which exist from the

Center to the Right extreme end of Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph. This

Epistemological Belief is a function of the determination on the part of all Adherents to The

Fifth Paradigm Worldview that there does exist a bona fide “Intuitive” human experience

which gives an individual human being genuine access to an objective dimension of

“Reality”, so as to legitimatize the inclusion of the data ascertained by means of this

“Intuitive” Experience as one to be taken into account when making all of one’s personal and

public ethical decisions.

The locus of the Fifth Paradigm “Left Middle-Marginalist” “Liberal” Worldview, along

the linear Worldview “Spectrum”, is then, the “dividing line” between “materialists”

and “spiritual” human beings.

65

However, Adherents to the “Liberal” Worldview refuse to allow the “data” accessed by

means of this “Intuitive” Experience of a human being to play a dominant … role in their

decision-making process. Such data is allowed to play merely an ancillary or supplemental

role as compared to the role which is allowed to be played by the “data” obtained through the

“materialist” process of “Scientific Logical-Positivism” (the “Mode of Ethical Reasoning” of

The Fourth Paradigm Scientific Rationalists.)

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold a Cosmological Belief which is similar to

the the Third Paradigm Worldview Cosmology. Like adherents to The Third Paradigm

Worldview, adherents to Then Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the “Cosmological” belief

that, while our physical universe is made up of real physical “matter”, this matter takes on its

FORM of specific physical manifestation as a result of the three-way inter-action among

“Energy”, “Mass” and “MIND.”

However, while adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview attribute to the human MIND

only the ability of the “Intellect”, adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview attribute a

specific metaphysical capacity to the human MIND. It is NOT a metaphysical capacity which

is able to directly effect matter (which is a distinctive belief of adherents to The Sixth

Paradigm Worldview). However, adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe that

we, as human beings, have direct metaphysical access to a unique dimension of “Reality”

which is an intimate part of their Cosmological Belief.

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview, like adherents to The First, Second, and Third

Paradigm Worldviews, recognize that all matter which comes into physical manifestation at

The Beginning of Time is dis-integrating into their smaller constituent, ultimately NON-

divisible units of matter.

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe, further, that each and every such

ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in our physical universe is, at the same time,repelling

itself out and away from every other such ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in our

physical universe.

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological Belief that there exists, in

a NON-contiguous dimension (the NON-material substance of which vibrates at a frequency

which is an “octave” higher in its rate of physical vibration than actual material “wave

functions” of physical energy and material “particles” vibrate within ourphysical world of

four “dimensions”) and that it is up and out of this “Quantum Realm” that our physical

universe “manifests.”

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the further Cosmological Belief that what it

is that determines the form our physical universe will “manifest” on this physical plane up

and out of this “Quantum Realm” is the function of two inter-acting phenomena. The first is

the “Ideal Form” in which all of the aspects of the Universeexist within this NON-contiguous

DIMENSION. And the second is the degree to which a given creative human mind can

“access”, or conceive of, the sum total of the specific items which exists within this dimension

as close as possible to their “Ideal” form and then “create” this specific “ideal” item here, in

66

our physical world of four dimensionswith his or her physical actions having been guided by

his or her “vision” of this item in its “Ideal” form in the “Quantum Realm” (or “The Realm

of The Forms”) of this Fifth Dimension of Reality.

While this Belief is, at base, an Epistemological belief (pertaining to how one, as a human

being, comes “to know” certain aspects of Reality), there is a specific Cosmological

dimension to this Belief as well, because adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the

Cosmological Belief that our physical universe is drawn up into physical manifestation, out of

this Fifth Dimension “Quantum Realm”, as the beginning of a new cycle of the physical

universe in a form which directly manifests THE IDEAL UNIVERSE WHICH EXISTS IN

THE FIFTH DIMENSION to the exact degree to which that “IDEAL” was “grasped”,

believed in, AND MANIFESTED THROUGH THE MECHANICAL ACTIVITIES of the

total mass of human beings who lived in the four-dimensional physical world during the

previous “cycle” of the physical universe. Thus, adherents to The Fifth Paradigm

Worldview believe that the “new” Universe (which “begins” with each new “cycle”) gets to

“begin” where the “old” Universe “left off.” This is a very distinctive and idealistic

Cosmology.

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview, like adherents to The Third Paradigm

Worldview, adhere to an Ontological Belief that Human Consciousness is an absolute

eternally-existing PARTNER (with “Energy” and “Mass”) in the eternal inter-action between

the “Positive” and the “Negative” forces in the physical universe and between “Mass” and

“Energy.” However, adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview do not attribute any

metaphysical or psychic power to our human Mind to be able to directlyeffect physical matter.

Rather, adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe that our individual and collective

human actions taken as a result of decisions made through an act of our human Mind guided

by our metaphysical perception of “Ideal” forms which actually exist in the Fifth Dimension,

taken in their aggregate, can effect the “material” universe – but only through our strictly

“normal” physical activities.

The “Epistemology” and “Theory of Human Psychology” which are generated by The Fifth

Paradigm Worldview are strictly “Sensory” and “Metaphysical” – but are “metaphysical” only

with regard to our perception, NOT with regard to our ability to directly effect physical

matter. That is, adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the “Epistemological”

Belief that we, as human beings, have “direct metaphysical perceptual “access to” a greater

“Truth” than that which we might otherwise obtain merely from a compilation the total

composite of raw materialist data which we can directly experience through our own personal

FIVE physical senses – because adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe that, as

human beings, we have the ability, through the exercise of our HUMAN FACULTY OF

INTUITION, to directly metaphysically discern, out beyond the confines of our the personal

experience of our five physical senses, real “data” pertaining to the “IDEAL WORLD”

which actually exists in a Fifth Dimension of Reality.

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the Psychological Belief that the

functioning of our human “Mind” is more than a mere material activity. It is a metaphysical

67

activity as well, since our “Mind” possesses a “faculty” of “INTUITION” as well as

“INTELLECT.” They believe that we, as human beings, are, therefore, capable, through the

exercise of our “faculty” of “INTUITION”, to make metaphysical judgments guiding our

moment-to-moment conduct and that our metaphysically-“guided” conduct can

constructively alter the otherwise strictly pre-determined dialectical or chaotic “pattern” in

which our physical universe would otherwise occur at each juncture of human decision

(though these constructive alterations can be undertaken only by traditional mechanical means

by our actions on the strictly physical plane). However, this additional “meta-physical”

capacity of discernment provided us with an “Intuitional Psychology ”, a much more

satisfactory psychological state of mind than our being simply

(A) a mere “flotsam” of “random” consciousness in an entirely chaotic physical universe

(pursuant to The First Paradigm Worldview),

(B) a mere slave to an entirely physically pre-determined, eternally-repeating, dialectical

existence (as is the belief of adherents to The Second Paradigm Worldview)

(C) a mere “Intellect” which has no “greater” access to aspects of Reality which exist “out

beyond” the reach of the direct physical experience of our mere five physical senses than that

that which we can “calculate” through our “Intellect” by intellectually discerning “patterns”

within the physical data obtained through the direct experience of our five physical senses and

then “projecting” these “patterns”(intellectually) “out beyond” the immediate physical reach

of our five senses (even our “reach” amplified by technology).

Instead, adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview adhere to a “Theory of Human

Psychology” pursuant to which we are

(D) “Intuitional” Beings, possessing a metaphysical faculty of “Intuition” by means of which

we, as individual human beings, can directly access an additional dimension of “REALITY”

itself which contains the “data of an “Ideal” Reality which we can then metaphysically

decide to “construct”, here within our four-dimensional world of space and time.

However, unlike adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview who believe that this additional

faculty of “Intuition” should play a central role in our human “Mode of Ethical Reasoning”,

adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe that the direct experience which we, as

human beings, experience by means of this additional faculty of “Intuition’ should be

relegated to a merely “supplemental” role in contributing to our “epistemology.” This is the

key belief of adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview which distinguishes them from the

adherents to ALL “Worldviews” to their “Right” (all of whom believe that there is NO

“epistemological” means which we have at our physical disposal, as human beings, by means

of which we can acquire direct “access to” Absolute Reality.) This “Belief” on the part of

adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview to the effect that this human faculty of Intuition

should play only a supplemental role in one’s determination of facts distinguishes the Fifth

Paradigm Worldview from all “Worldviews” to their “Left,” all of whom believe that we have

68

direct experiential access to Absolute Reality. And that the “Absolute Reality” to which we

have directexperiential access as human beings (either through an exercise of our Intuition as

adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview or through an exercise of our Spiritual Facility

as adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview) should be given absolute

CENTRALITY in the process of our making determinations of FACT and in our “Mode of

Ethical Reasoning.”

Because of these combined “Cosmological”, “Teleological”, “Ontological”,

“Epistemological” and “Psychological” beliefs on the part of adherents to The Fifth Paradigm

Worldview, adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview adhere to a “Philosophy” which is

“Idealistic.”

In its “Lower” Manifestation, the Fifth Paradigm Worldview generates the “Mode of Ethical

Reasoning” of Plato, this being the IDEALISTIC Mode of Ethical Reasoning. Pursuant to

this Mode of Ethical Reasoning, one merely supplements one’s “Intellectual” projection of the

“patterns” discerned within the physical data obtained by means of one’s five physical senses

by the additional means of a purely “Intuitional” experience by means of which one

intuitionally accesses THE REALM OF THE FORMS, which is an actual “dimension” of

Reality – though it is not physically contiguous to the four-dimensional physical Reality in

which we dwell. In this “REALM” resides TRUE “Reality”, in its IDEAL and PERFECT

form. Utilizing this “Ideal Form” as one’s “model”, one then undertakes to replicate here,

within our four-dimensional material world, that “Ideal” form.

In its “Higher” Manifestation, The Fifth Paradigm Worldview generates the “Philosophy” of

“Theosophy” of Alice Bailey, Anne Bessant and Helen Blavatsky. The “Mode ofSpiritual

Expression” of adherents to The Fifth Paradigm is, in its “Lower” Manifestation, Hindu. In its

“Higher” Manifestation, it is Fakir.

In its “Social Form”, The Fifth Paradigm Worldview “manifests” itself, in its “Lower”

Manifestation, in the form of PLATO’S REUBLIC, in the Greek City State of ATHENS or in

Alexander The Great’s 331 B.C. City of Alexandria in Egypt. In its “Higher” Manifestation,

The Fifth Paradigm Worldview manifests itself in the “Social Form” of The Hindu “Raj.”

[1] When two of these otherwise “inchoate” (i.e. un-“manifest”) Quantum Fields “manifest”

themselves (or “differentiate” themselves) within the otherwise entirely UN-“manifest” AND

UN-“differentiated” FINITE “FIELD” OF “CONSCIOUSNESS” in the “form” of a

“SINGULARITY” (i.e. a mere “voltage differential”), there suddenly “occurs”flowing

“between” these two suddenly “existent” points a single “wave function” of “Energy.” This

single “wave function” of “Energy” is the first “unit” of “Matter” in the Universe. This is an

“Electron Volt Unit.”

69

[2] Pursuant this Belief, Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview engage in a “Mode of

Spiritual Expression” which holds the belief that, while the Physical Cosmos (being itself a

confluence of “Mass” and “Energy”) does possess “Consciousness” of ITself (in the same

way that we, as human beings – being a confluence of “Mass” and “Energy” – possess

“Consciousness”), the Consciousnes of The Cosmos remains “separate” from our

Consciousness…while, at the same time, constituting an “IDEAL” Consciousness which we,

as human beings, can bring our Consciousness into “alignment with” by IMATATING this

“IDEAL” Consciousness…like all Ideal” forms within the Realm of The Forms.

[3] Functioning as true “Utilitarians”, Professor Rawls argues, in his A Theory of Justice, that

some Adherents to the strictly “practical” Fourth Paradigm “Scientific Logical Positivist”

Worldview “take into full account” the potential bone fides of the Sixth Paradigm

“Intuitionists” assertions that they, as human beings, are capable of “directly experiencing” an

other dimension of Reality which generate bona fide data and, therefore, according to

Professor Rawls, some Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview simply add in the data

obtained by the Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview to the data obtained from their

strictly “Scientific Logical Positivist” sources as Fourth Paradigm Adherents generating a

“Hybrid” (as distinct from a genuinely generic) Fifth, “Liberal” Worldview. However,

according to Professor Rawls, Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worlsview do NOT attribute

“central” importance to this Sixth Paradigm “intuitive” data. They treat this Sixth Paradigm

data as simply “supplemental” to the data they have garnered via their Scientific Logical

Positivist “Epistemology.”

[4] One will recall that Plato, the ultimate “Philosopher” of The Fifth Paradigm, places the

“Ideal” human observer in the position, in his “Allegory of The Cave” (in his Republic),

ONLY in “between” the Fire and the REAL “Players”, thereby being uniquely capable of

recognizing that the “Shadows” cast by the Fire upon the wall of the caveare only shadows.

But even this “Ideal” observer is NOT “THE” REAL Player. Therefore, pursuant to

the“Ontology” of The Fifth Paradigm, even the “Ideal” human observer is ONLY capable of

“imitating” the conduct of the REAL Player. So, such an “Ideal” particpant in Reality is

ONLY an “imatator” (an “Actor”) and is NOT entitled to have the ABSOLUTE confidence in

his judgments which a REAL “PLAYER” would have. He is only somewhere “in between” a

“Shadow” and a REAL “Player.” So, he should act “in moderation” on the basis of his

perception of “The Ideal.”

PILLARS OF BELIEF:

3.7.1. The Cosmological Question

How did our physical universe first come into being, and what are the physical laws that

govern its past, present, and future functioning?

Plato is the undisputed Philosopher of the Fifth Paradigm Liberal Worldview. Thus we must

look to Plato for an articulation of the Cosmology of The Fifth Paradigm.

The most significant aspect of Plato’s Cosmology (which distinguishes his Cosmology from

the Cosmology of The Fourth Paradigm Worldview articulated by Aristotle) and from each of

70

the other Worldviews discussed to this point is Plato’s insistence that there exist two distinct

and NON-“Contiguous” realms of REALITY.

While Adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview projected out an intellectually potential

Realm of Reality and then chose to conduct their human conduct as thoughTHAT potential

Reality were true (thereby existentially making THAT Reality TRUE) and while Adherents to

The Fourth Paradigm Worldview projected out a mathematically probable realm of Reality

which probably exists out beyond our present physical capacity to access this realm of Reality

through our five presently acknowledged physical human senses but then choose to confine

their human conduct strictly to the physical world which they “know” for certain – that is to

the world which they are able to confirm scientifically. Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm

Worldview hold an Epistemological Belief which sets them apart from Adherents to ALL of

the Worldviews from the center of Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph to its extreme

right which causes Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview to hold a fifth categorically

distinct cosmology.

This unique Epistemological belief will be discussed in detail immediately below. However,

for purposes of introducing the unique “Cosmology” of Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm

Worldview, it will be necessary to simply introduce this Epistemological Belief here.

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the Epistemological Belief that we, as a

human species, possess a SIXTH SENSE. This is a Sixth biological human sense – like

“seeing”, “hearing”, “touch”, “taste” and “smell” – by means of which each human being is

capable of directly experiencing the physical phenomenon which bonds together every

irreducible “integer” of matter (i.e. every single inchoate quantum field) in the entire physical

Universe to every other such inchoate quantum field. In other words, Adherents to The Fifth

Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological Belief that there exists within the physical

Universe a REAL phenomenon which is not material (that is, which has no “mass” and also is

not any form of “energy”) which bonds together – INTO ONE SINGLE UNITARY MONAD

– every single solitary individual “Inchoate Quantum Field” of “Matter in the entire physical

Universe.

This NON – material phenomenon, Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe to be

“CONSCIOUSNESS.”

In other words, Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological Belief

that the physical Universe is made up of TWO essentially distinct phenomena. One is a finite

number of Inchoate Quantum Fields (which manifest in the form of a singularity within the

otherwise entirely undifferentiated FINITE “FIELD” OF CONSCIOUSNESS which

constitutes the “Netter” of the physical Universe. These “Inchoate Quantum Fields” generate

“Energy” and “Matter.”[1]) The interplay of “Energy” and “Matter” make up one of TWO

essentially distinct phenomena which make our Universe. The other is the entirely

undifferentiated FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS which constitutes the “Netter” of the

physical Universe.

71

Pursuant to the Cosmological Belief of Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview, one

Realm of REALITY is the Material Realm of physical matter. This is the three-dimensional

Physical World…which is made up of physical manifestations of “Matter”…which make up

all of “material” reality.

The second Realm of Reality is the “Realm of Consciousness” – an entirely NON-material

Realm…but a Realm which exists just as REAL as the Material “Realm” of Reality. To

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview however, this is NOT the merely intellectually –

projected potential reality of the Third Paradigm Existential Worldview. NOR is this

Cosmology of The Fifth Paradigm Worldview merely the Intellectually – Projected,

Theoretically – Real Cosmology of The Fourth Paradigm “Scientific Logical Positivist”

Worldview. This second, NON-material “Realm of Consciousness” is REAL. It EXISTS! It

is, therefore, directly accessible.

This Realm, Plato argues, is just as “real” as is the material realm in which every person

plays out his or her day-to-day life of eating, sleeping, working, reproducing and walking

around. Indeed, Plato goes so far as to assert that this “Realm of the Forms” is, in a very real

way, MORE REAL than the simply material world (comparing the material world to a mere

“shadow play” cast upon the wall of a cave by the “REAL” actors and dancers…who exist

in…indeed who find their very source of “being” in this other REALM OF THE FORMS.)

This ancient Greek idea insisted upon by Plato in his Republic indeed foreshadows the

discovery, some 2,300 years later, by Max Planck, Louis de Broglie, Werner Heisenberg and

Neils Borr of the non-material “Inchoate Quantum Field” out of which all “material” objects

“manifest.”

3.7.2. The Teleological Question

Is there a specific direction in which our physical universe is unfolding, and if there is,

what is the role of our human species, if any, in this unfolding?

Since Adherents to the Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe that this other NON – Material

Realm actually exists AND since Adherents to this Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe that we

human beings Epistemologically possess an explicit biological faculty by means of which we

can directly acquire real knowledge from this other realm, Adherents to this Fifth Paradigm

Worldview hold the “Teleological” Belief that all human conduct CAN, through the exercise

of GOOD CONSCIOUS HUMAN JUDGMENT, be BROUGHT INTO CONSCIOUS

ALIGNMENT WITH THE IMPLICATE ORDER WHICH ACTUALLY RESIDES IN

THIS OTHER REALM AS AN IDEALLY STRUCTURED PHYSICAL REALITY.

This ideally structured Reality abides in this physically-real “Realm of The Ideal Forms” to

which adequately well-informed individual human beings can acquire access through

adequate training – and can, then, govern their conduct in accordance with the knowledge of

the IDEAL “FORM” garnered from The Realm of The Forms –and can govern others in

accordance with this special knowledge to draw our human culture, more and more, into

72

complete alignment with the structure of the “Ideal Forms” which abide in The Realm of The

Forms.

This elite-governed activity, then, constitutes the teleological dynamic by means of which our

human world will, step-by-step, be drawn into alignment with The Ideal… while these TWO

distinct Worlds shall forever remain separate and distinct.

3.7.3. The Ontological Question

How did sentient consciousness come into being (especially human consciousness)?

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the Ontological Belief that, while human

Consciousness is the product of a purely physical interaction between “Mass” and

“Energy”… human consciousness has the real ability (NOT just potential and NOT just

theoretical) to become EXACTLY LIKE the IDEAL CONSCIOUSNESS which abides

within the other Realm of The Ideal Forms which must, however, remain forever separate and

distinct from the Material Realm.

Thus, while Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the Ontological Belief that

human Consciousness IS one and the same WITH the Consciousness which exists as the

cosmological Bonding Phenomenon (or “Netter”) of the entire physical Universe (therefore

there being no “essential” difference between the “Consciousness” of The Cosmos and human

“Consciousness”, since there is only ONE radically “Monistic” Reality), Adherents to The

Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold an essentially dualistic Ontology believing that, while human

beings can imitate the Ideal Consciousness of The Cosmos, human beings can NOT share

directly IN the Consciousness of The Cosmos.[2]

3.7.4. The Epistemological Question

What are the means by which we as human beings are capable of discerning the “facts”

that constitute the answer to ultimate cosmic questions such as these?

As indicated above, it is the unique Epistemological Belief of Adherents to The Fifth

Paradigm Worldview which distinguishes Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm

Worldviewcategorically from the Adherents to ALL of the “Worldviews” from the center of

Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph to the extreme right of this Bar Graph. For NONE

of the Adherents from the center to the extreme right of Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar

Graph believe that we, as human beings, possess any means by which we can obtain “access”

to Absolute Reality itself.

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview hold the Epistemological Belief that human

beings have access to genuine NON – material Realm of Reality which actually Existsto

which we, as human beings, can gain access to definitively REAL data which enables us to

make ABSOLUTE decisions about Reality (as compared to merely relative “good” decisions

[Second Paradigm decisions], potentially “good” decisions (Third Paradigm decisions] or

73

theoretically “good” decisions [Fourth Paradigm decisions]). This is the truly distinguishing

characteristic of The Fifth Paradigm “Epistemology.” It is also the characteristic of The Fifth

Paradigm Worldview which causes Adherents to ALL of the “other” Worldviews to the right

of this Worldview to view Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview as “Fuzzy-Headed”,

“un-grounded” (in physical Reality) and at the same time “self-righteous.”

3.7.5. Mode of Ethical Reasoning

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview exercise all of the purely “Scientific” criteria of

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview in gathering their data, but, since they hold the

Epistemological Belief that we, as human beings, have direct experiential access to the very

real “Realm of The Ideal Forms,” Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview supplement

their data derived from their exercise of “Scientific Logical Positivism” with an exercise of

“Intuition,” causing them to modify their otherwise purely “Majoritarian Utilitarian” Mode of

Ethical Reasoning with an “Intuitive” supplement. This “Intuitive supplement” causes

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview to select options which, while these choices do

generate the greatest good for the greatest number, these choices also at the same time

generate at least something for the least well off. This Fifth Paradigm “Liberal” Mode of

Ethical Reasoning is discussed, in detail, by Professor John Rawls in his famous work entitled

A Theory of Justice published, in 1972, by Harvard University Press.

Professor Rawls attributes the adoption of this specific “Mode of Ethical Reasoning” by

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm “Liberal” Worldview to the influence upon otherwise rigid

Adherents to The Fourth Paradigm Worldview of the “Mode of Ethical Reasoning” adhered to

by Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm “Intuitionist” Worldview.[3] In fact, the adoption of the

Fifth Paradigm Mode of Ethical Reasoning which attributes merely a supplemental

importance to the data obtained via the human “Intuitive” faculty is the product of an entirely

distinct Cosmology, Teleology, Ontology and Epistemology on the part of Adherents to The

Fifth Paradigm Worldview. They attribute a merelysupplemental role to this data NOT as a

Utilitartian judgment, but, instead, because Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview, as

distinct from The Sixth Paradigm experience the human “Faculty of Intuition,” as merely

supplemental to their otherwise strictly Intellectual Faculty.

This is because their ONTOLOGICAL Belief informs The Fifth Paradigm Worldview that

we, as human beings, are capable ONLY of imitating the “Ideal Consciousness of The

Cosmos”, NOT of Being AT ONE WITH the Consciousness of The Cosmos. For this reason,

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm are willing to place ONLY a supplemental degree of

reliance upon the data obtained via this imitation of “Ideal” Consciousness.[4]

One will recall that Plato, the ultimate “Philosopher” of The Fifth Paradigm, places the

“Ideal” human observer in the position, in his “Allegory of The Cave” (in his Republic), in

between the Fire and the REAL “Players”, thereby being uniquely capable of recognizing that

the shadows cast by the fire upon the wall of the cave are only shadows. But even this “Ideal”

observer is NOT “THE” REAL Player. Therefore, pursuant to the Ontology of The Fifth

Paradigm, even the “Ideal” human observer is ONLY capable of imitating the conduct of the

REAL Player.

74

So, such an “Ideal” participant in Reality is ONLY an imitator and NOT entitled to have the

ABSOLUTE confidence in his judgments which a REAL “PLAYER” would have. He is only

somewhere in between a “Shadow” and a REAL “Player.” So, he should act in moderation on

the basis of his perception of “The Ideal.” Thus, for the Adherent to The Fifth Paradigm

Worldview, the “Intuitional” experience functions solely as a supplement to his otherwise

entirely reason-based “scientific” judgments … NOT because an Adherent to The Fifth

Paradigm Worldview is nothing more than a more practical Utilitarian (as Professor Parsons’

asserts) but because he holds a profound Ontological Belief that his Faculty of Reason holds

him forever separate and apart from the fully-engulfing Intuitive Experience which would

allow (or compel) him to give to this “Intuitive Experience” the truly “Central” role in his or

her decision-making process.

3.8. The Sixth Paradigm Worldview One will remember that Dr. John Rawls, the long-time Chairman of the Department of

Philosophy of Harvard University, identified the Intuitionist School of Justice as the source of

the philosophy which functioned to caveat the otherwise strictly Utilitarian School of Justice

within Western Civilization to generate a School of Justice which Dr. Rawls believed to be

the Liberal School of Justice. However, even Professor Rawls, one of Western Culture’s true

philosophical giants of recent history, was unable to identify in meaningfully clear and

concise terms why this Intuitionist School of Justice was not, itself, an adequately-preeminent

School of Thought as to enable IT (in its own right) to be the source of an integrated ethic

which ever rose to a status capable of governing Western Civilization.

Indeed, from direct personal interviews with Professor Rawls, it is clear that, while Professor

Rawls appeared to comprehend the fact that it was some form of Intuitive experience which

constituted the core source of the authority to the Intuitionist School of Justice, Dr. Rawls, as

an Adherent to the Fourth Paradigm philosophy of Scientific Logical Positivism, was not

willing to credit the intuitive experience with being an adequately legitimate category of

human experience to be cited as the key phenomenon when discussing The Intuitionist School

of Justice.

While located next to the Left-Systemist Worldview on Professor Talcott Parsons’

Sociological Bar Graph, Adherents to the Left-Marginalists Worldview do NOT assert a

COSMOLOGICAL belief in the existence of an Infinite and Eternal Sea of Un-differentiated

Consciousness existing out beyond the physical parameters of our Physical Universe as the

Source of our Physical Universe – as do Adherents to The Left- Systemists Worldview.

The Answer which Adherents to the Left-Marginalist Worldview provide to the

EPISTEMOLOGICAL Question is the Key belief which MOST IMPORTANTLY

distinguishes Adherents to the Left-Marginalist Worldview from the Adherents to all of the

Worldviews located to the right of Middle Marginalists (who reside at The Center of the

Sociological Bar Graph.)

75

For, starting with the Left-MIDDLE-Marginalist Liberals, Adherents to the three Worldviews

which are located on the Left half of Dr. Talcott Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph all hold a

unique Epistemological Belief that: There exists a biological human faculty which is

operative within each member of our human species which to a greater or lesser degree merits

being granted a direct and active role in one’s Mode of Ethical Reasoning and decision-

making.[2]

However, the answers given by the Adherents to the Left-Marginalist position (to the

Cosmological Question and the Epistemological Question) generate a different Answer to

both of the other two Cosmic Questions, the answers to the four of which determine the

position to be taken by an Adherent to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview on public policy

issues.

This difference in the answers provided by Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview to

these FOUR QUESTIONS OF ULTIMATE FACT is of ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL

IMPORTANCE to our present undertaking - because these differences generate the

fundamental difference between the public policy positions which will be taken by Adherents

to the Left-Marginalist Position and the positions which will be taken on these same public

policy issues by Adherents to each of the other Worldviews.

The major reason why the public policy positions taken by Adherents to the Left- Marginalist

Worldview will be different from the public policy positions which will be taken by the

Adherents to the Left-Systemist Worldview is that the public policy positions of the Left--

Marginalists Worldview will be clearly CONSTITUTIONAL when they are openly proposed

and advocated - IN A CONSTITUTIONALLY- MANDATED SECULAR LEGISLATIVE

SETTING (such as obtains in the United States) – while the Public Policy positions which are

taken by Adherents to the Seventh Paradigm (Theistic) Worldview are totally dependent upon

one’s believing in the existence of an Infinite Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness as the

Source of The Physical Universe AND as the Source of the NORMATIVE VALUES upon

which one predicates one’s public policy choices.

The utilization of such a predicate for the public policy choices which one makes as a public

official (and, therefore, as an Agent of The State) can be argued – and, indeed, will be argued

by many – to violate the Establishment of Religion Clause of our American Constitution, the

clause which is set forth as the very first provision of the very First Amendment to our

American Constitution. This clause expressly prohibits our Federal Legislature from making

any law respecting an establishment of (state) religion.[3]

What, therefore, are the answers the Sixth Paradigm Worldview provides to the COSMIC

QUESTIONS OF ULTIMATE FACT upon which the platform of the Sixth Paradigm

Worldview rests which distinguish this Worldview from the potentially un-Constitutional

Theistic Seventh Paradigm Worldview?

76

And do these answers constitutionally distinguish the Principles, the Public Policies and the

Public and Private Programs which are generated by this Sixth Paradigm Worldview from

answers which are provided to these same FOUR COSMIC QUESTIONS by Adherents to the

Seventh Paradigm Theist Worldview which are constitutionally questionable?

Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological belief that our Physical

Universe has always existed – just as do Adherents to The Second, Third and Fifth Paradigm

Worldview – and in the same manner that Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview

hold the Cosmological Belief that THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF

UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS which emanated our Physical Universe into

material existence has always existed.

Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological Believe that our Physical

Universe expands and contracts, just like the heart of a Living Being, expanding out from a

state of Absolute Mass into a state of Absolute Energy and then back into a state of Absolute

Mass and then back out again into a state of Absolute Energy – just as do Adherents to The

Second Paradigm Worldview and Adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview.

However, whereas Adherents to The Second Paradigm Worldview hold the Teleological

Believe that we, as human beings, can have absolutely no effect whatsoever upon the

otherwise entirely materially predetermined course of events which will take place within

each oscillation of our Physical Universe (all of which are simply re-enacted, over and over

again, throughout all of Eternity in strict accordance with the entirely pre-determined and

unalterable mechanical laws of physics);

whereas Adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview hold the Teleological Belief that we, as

human beings, can effect the otherwise entirely materially physically pre-determined events

which are going to occur strictly in accordance with the physically pre-determined physical

laws of our Universe by exercising our Intellect (which Adherents to The Third Paradigm

Worldview believe, as a function of their Epistemological Belief, we possess as the only

additional means which we possess beyond our five physical senses through which can

discern Reality and then make the existential choice to alter the otherwise pre-determined

patterns by means of directly applying physical forces at our disposal to the matter in the

Universe through mechanical means);

and whereas Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe that we are capable,

through the exercise of our faculty of INTUITION, to make metaphysical judgments guiding

our every-day conduct and that our conduct can constructively alter the otherwise pre-

determined dialectical or chaotic pattern our Physical Universe would be in at each juncture

of human decision, but that these constructive alterations can be undertaken only by means of

traditional purely mechanical means by our actions undertaken on the strictly physical and

mechanical plane; Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the Epistemological

Belief that we, as human beings, possess not only the faculty of meta-physical discernment, or

Intuition (over and above our five physical senses of sight, touch, smell, hearing and taste);

they believe, additionally that we, as human beings, can directly and experientially discern the

77

physical phenomenon which bonds together every single ultimately-irreducible integer of

matter in the entire Physical Universe into one, single, harmonic – indeed holographic –

entity. This is categorically different than the objective metaphysical source of data to which

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe our human Intuition is effectively

directed. Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe that the source of data toward

which their faculty of Human Intuition is directed is a set of Ideal Forms of potential material

objects which exists within a Fifth Dimension of Reality (i.e. in The Realm of The Forms)

which Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview believe exists just outside of our four-

dimensional world but which is not contiguous to our four-dimensional world.

Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe, categorically differently, that the source

of data into which one directs the exercise of one’s faculty of Human Intuition is the Unified

Field which consists of a physical phenomenon similar to the phenomena of gravity or

magnetism (just as the phenomena of light and sound are directly experientially accessible to

we human beings through our faculties of sight and hearing.) The Unified Field within which

this bonding phenomenon exists and functions is believed by Adherents to The Sixth

Paradigm Worldview to be directly contiguous to our four-dimensional world. Indeed, this

physical phenomenon is believed by Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview to pervade

our entire four-dimensional world, holding it together. It is, indeed, the “glue” of our four-

dimensional world.

However, Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe that this Unified Field also

contains substantive data constituting information about every single other ultimately-

irreducible integer of matter in the entire physical universe, data which we human beings are

capable of directly experience by means of our Intuitive faculty.

Moreover, in addition to adhering to this critical Epistemological Belief, Adherents to The

Sixth Paradigm Worldview adhere to the Teleological Belief that, through the exercise of this

same unique additional human physical faculty of Intuition, we human beings are capable of

directly physically effecting every inchoate quantum field of incipient matter which will

manifest itself up and out of the Inchoate Quantum Realm in the form of energy or mass –

thereby enabling every individual human being to potentially directly physically alter

“Reality” by means of his or her intentional direction of human intention toward said inchoate

quantum fields.

THIS is an absolutely unique Teleological feature of The Sixth Paradigm Worldview[1].

Further, in the same manner in which Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the

belief that we human beings, as individuated confluences of mass and energy, manifest

consciousness, they hold the Ontological Belief that our Monistic Physical Universe is itself

conscious. In effect, Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe that thoroughly

pervading the total of mass and energy which together make up THE MONAD which is our

Physical Universe, there exists an entirely non-material field of totally UN-differentiated

CONSCIOUSNESS.

78

However, unlike Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview (who hold the Ontological

Belief that there exists [and always has existed] an INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF

UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS out beyond the physical parameters of our

Physical Universe – extending out and away from the exterior physical boundary of our

Physical Universe into an entirely open-ended INFINITY (and which SEA OF

UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS, Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Theistic

Worldview believe emanated into physical existence our entire Physical Universe).

Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the Ontological Belief that there exists an

entirely FINITE Field of Consciousness which thoroughly pervades the FINITE collective of

mass and energy which constitutes our Physical Universe – and that out and beyond the

totally FINITE physical boundary of our Physical Universe there exists absolutely nothing at

all other than totally empty space, i.e. “The Void.”

Thus Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe that Mass, Energy and

Consciousness exist as a finite TRINITY, if you will, abiding within “THE VOID” of Space.

The Epistemology and Theory of Human Psychology which is generated by this Sixth

Paradigm Worldview is, thus, intensely Sensory, Intuitive and Effective. That is, Adherents

to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the belief that we, as human beings, have access to

Absolute Truth, a completely holistic Truth, much greater than that which we could ever

possibly obtain solely and exclusively from the mechanical compilation of the total composite

of raw materialist data that we might be able to directly personally physically experience

through our generally accepted five physical senses, and also much greater than we could ever

possibly simply calculate algorithmically through the application of our Intellect to the raw

data obtained by our simple Five Physical Senses.

While Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe, as do Adherents to The Third,

Fourth and Fifth Paradigm Worldviews, that we, as human beings, possess the ability, through

the exercise of our human MIND (i.e. our Intellect), to ascertain patterns within the data

which we can physically access – which patterns we can then project out beyond the confines

to which our five physical senses are confined in order to conceive of possible manifestations

of Reality which lie beyond the experiential reach of our five physical senses – but which bear

a specific relationship to the ultimately Real World, Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm

Worldview believe additionally that we, as human beings, have direct physical access to

Absolute Truth (which Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview deem to be the sum total

of all of the present manifestations of all of the existent inchoate and choate quantum fields

which exists within the physical parameters of THE MONAD which is our Physical

Universe)… to which we each have direct, physical access through the exercise of our

additional physical faculty of Intuition.

Thus, the Cosmology of an Adherent to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview is a FINITE physical

configuration of the explicitly finite number of inchoate and choate quantum fields which

exist at this moment – and which have always existed (each of which possesses, at every

moment, the potential of manifesting into a wave of energy or a particle of mass) the sum

total of which quantum fields always co-exist within a spherical Field of Consciousness

79

(while Consciousness holds this finite number of quantum fields into one, unified holographic

MONAD) and which Unified Field of Consciousness therefore constitutes the Netter of the

Reality which physically manifests itself within this physical holographic MONAD, and

which Consciousness contains within it The Implicate Order of All Reality.

In its Lower Manifestation, the Sixth Paradigm Worldview generates a Mode of Ethical

Reasoning which inveterately seeks absolute physical harmony within the Physical Universe.

This is the Mode of Ethical Reasoning pursuant to which an individual human being, when

faced with a choice among a range of alternative forms of human conduct, will choose that

specific form of human conduct which, both individually and collectively, will generate the

highest possible degree of physical harmony within The Natural Order of Being within THE

HOLOGRAPHIC MONAD of our Physical Universe. This harmony is discerned primarily

through one’s direct intuitional experience of the harmonic tone which exists within the

interplay of all of the vibrational frequencies which are intrinsic to each and every collective

of mass, energy and consciousness which exist in the entire Physical Universe and the

exercise, in the midst of this experience of this harmonic tone, of one’s intuitive sense of what

action on one’s part perfectly harmonizes with that harmonic tone which is generated by the

sum total of all of the vibrational frequencies in our Physical Universe.

In its Higher Manifestation, the Sixth Paradigm Worldview generates the Mode of Ethical

Reasoning pursuant to which each individual human being directly accesses THE

CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE COSMOS itself and melds one’s seemingly individuated

Consciousness into THE UNISTIC CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE COSMOS and then acts out

of this UNISTIC Consciousness. This Mode of Ethical Reasoning is not so much physical

(even to the degree of being able to intuitively discern the physically harmonious action

which one must take in any given circumstance), but is, rather, “MONIC”, in the sense that

one’s action flows, instead, directly from the Monistic Consciousness of The Cosmos itself.

The Lower Manifestation of the Sixth Paradigm Worldview generates the Philosophy of

Pythagoras.

In its Higher Manifestation, The Sixth Paradigm Worldview generates the Philosophy of

Epimenides of Ancient Greece – or Theravadin Buddhism of Asanga who established, in the

Fourth Century B.C. the Yogacara School of Philosophy (World Religions, p. 141) and of

Mahayana Buddhism of Nararjuana who established, in the Second Century A.D. the

Madhyamika School of Philosophy (World Religions, p.140.)

The Mode of Spiritual Expression of Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm is, in its Lower

Manifestation, therefore Pythagorean or Epimenidean. In its “Higher” Manifestation it is Zen

Buddhist.

The Social Form in which The Sixth Paradigm Worldview manifests itself, in its Lower

Manifestation, is the form of The Ancient Greek Pythagorean Community, such as those

which were actually established in ancient Greece between 530 B.C. 470 B.C. and the

paradigmatic Sixth Paradigm Community known as “ATLANTIS.”

80

In its Higher Manifestation, The Sixth Paradigm Worldview has expressed itself in the Social

Form of Tibet.

[1] While adherents to The First Paradigm Worldview believe that “Shamans” are capable of

“accessing” certain subtle physical forces which reside in nature and “directing” those forces

to influence physical events within our four-dimensional world, adherents to The Sixth

Paradigm Worldview hold the belief that each and every human beingpossesses the

metaphysical capability to reach into the very heart of “inchoate” Reality itself and alter the

next moment of physical Reality itself in accordance with that individual human being’s

WILL.

[2] It is simply the degree of “centrality” which this “faculty” should play in one’s ethical

decision-making that differentiates the specific “Mode of Ethical Reasoning” on each of these

“Left-of-Center” Worldviews one from the other. Fifth Paradigm Adherents maintain that its

role should be “marginal” (so as to merely “caveat” one’s otherwise strictly “rational” Fourth

Paradigm “Scientifically-Logically-Positive” Mode of Ethical Reasoning.) Seventh Paradigm

Adherents maintain that its role should be effectively “exclusive” (allowing the data obtained

from this “other realm” to govern all of one’s “ethical” decisions.) And Sixth Paradigm

Adherents maintain that the role of this “Intuitive” faculty should be “central” to one’s ethical

decision-making, though NOT “exclusive.”

[3] More sophisticated Constitutional Scholars would argue (quite persuasively) that

predicating mere legislative proposals to our Federal Legislature which are predicated upon

“data” secured by Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm from “Prayer” would NOT transgress

the principle prohibiting the “establishment” of religion by our Federal Government so long

as any mere “proposal” made by such Adherents was put to a completely open and

democratic vote on its substantive merits as a “secularly”-effective manner of addressing a

specific “secular” public policy problem. However, the “opponents” to any such “proposal”

would, almost certainly, assert that the legislative enactment of any “public” proposal which

was itself “predicated upon” data purportedly secured through “prayer” would constitute “a

law respecting an establishment of religion” thereby generating a perfectly “good faith”

substantial public controversy over any such public policy proposal.

[4] See, e.g. “A New Perspective On Reality”, pp.5-14; “The Enfolding-Unfolding Universe:

A Conversation Wirh David Bohm, by Renee Weber; pp. 44-105; “Reflections On The

Holographic Paradigm” by Kenneth Dychtwald,

1. 105-113; and “The Holographic Model, The Holistic Paradigm, Information Theory and

Consciousness” by John R. Battista, pp. 143-150.

3.8.1 The Cosmological Question

How did our physical universe first come into being, and what are the physical laws that

govern its past, present, and future functioning?

Adherents to the Left-Marginalist position along Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph

are not THEISTS - as are Adherents to the Left-Systemist Worldview. That is; they do not

assert an affirmative Belief that there exists an Infinite & Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated

Consciousness which enfolds into being our Physical Universe and which inputs into our

81

Physical Universe the normative data in accordance with which we, as human beings, ought

to comport our ethical judgments and conduct.

However, neither are Adherents to the Left-Marginalist Worldview ATHEISTS - as are Right

Systemists, who affirmatively believe and declare that there exists no such Infinite and

Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness outside of (or inside of) the Physical Universe

which lends any coherent meaning to the Universe.

Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological Belief that our Physical

Universe is holographic. This means that Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview

believe that every single inchoate quantum field of potential matter which exists within the

physical universe contains within it the identifying data which determines THE ENTIRE

CONTENT & STRUCTURE OF THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE … that is: that our Physical

Universe is indeed a fractal macro-function of the content and internal structure of each

inchoate quantum field within our Physical Universe. Also, Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm

Worldview believe that each inchoate quantum field within our Physical Universe is a fractal

micro-function of our physical Universe.

What this means is that Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Left-Marginalist Worldview believe

that ALL OF THE DATA (or information) WHICH IS NECESSARY TO MANIFEST THE

ENTIRE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE IS CONTAINED WITHIN EVERY INCHOATE

QUANTUM FIELD which exists within the physical boundaries of our Universe …i.e. that

data does not need to come from outside our Physical Universe.

Dr. Juan Maldacena of Harvard University first conjectured such a relationship between each

inchoate quantum field in our universe and our Physical Universe itself in 1997. His

hypothesis was later affirmed by Dr. Edward Witten of the Institute for Advanced Study in

Princeton, N.J. and still later by Dr. Steven S. Gubser, Dr. Igor R. Klebanov and Dr.

Alexander M. Polyakov of Princeton University.

This holographic correspondence between each inchoate quantum field and every larger

manifestation of quantum reality in our Physical Universe exists on ever-larger material

planes (including the entire Physical Universe) where individual planes of existence are

designated as space-times with a variety of different dimensions… including the largest of all

possible space-times, the space-time which constitutes our entire Physical Universe. See,

Scientific American, Volume 289, Number 2 “Information in The Holographic Universe”, by

Jacob D. Bekenstein, pp. 59-65.

The most recent modern explication of this specific Cosmological Belief of the Sixth

Paradigm Worldview is referred to as “The Holographic Paradigm.” A number of works

explaining this “New Paradigm” are set forth in a work entitled “The Holographic Paradigm:

Exploring The Leading Edge of Science” edited by Kenneth Wilber and published by

Shambala Press in Boston in 1985.[4])

82

This specific Cosmological Belief is explained, in detail, in the cover story article published

in Scientific American Magazine in August of 2003. This article is entitled “Are You A

Hologram? Modern Quantum Physics Says The Entire Universe Might Be.” Vol.289,

Scientific American, Number 2, August, 2003, pp. 58-65.

Pursuant to this specific Cosmological Belief, Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview

believe that our Physical Universe is made up of a finite number of ultimately-irreducible

integers of matter and that these integers are bound together into a single, unitive Universe (or

MONAD) by an explicit physical bonding phenomenon (like magnetism or gravity) which

functions as a wave-like phenomenon (just as do light waves and sound waves which were,

also, at one time, not directly discernable by the un-evolved forms of life which existed here

on our Earth billions of years ago.) Through the medium of this specific physical bonding

phenomenon, Adherents to this Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe that each such

ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in our Physical Universe is directly bonded with each

and every single other such integer in the entire physical Universe.

This ultimately-irreducible integer of matter is an “inchoate” Quantum Field which does NOT

exist in any specific material form (as “matter.”) However, this bonding phenomenon

manifests itself to us (in a form which is physically discernable to us, given our limited state

of technological development) when such an otherwise un-manifest Quantum Field manifests

itself in the form of a wave function of flow along a differential existing between any two

such inchoate quantum fields. Thus, Cosmologically, Adherents to the Left- Marginalist

position along Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph are MON-ISTS, indeed, they are

RADICAL MONISTS.

3.8.2. The Teleological Question

Is there a specific direction in which our physical universe is unfolding, and if there is,

what is the role of our human species, if any, in this unfolding?

Adherents to the Left-Marginalist position believe that every member of our Human Species

possesses a latent biological faculty which is directly analogous to our faculty of sight or

hearing which is evolving TELEOLOGICALLY (that is: progressively, one small step at a

time in a measurable direction into the future).

Adherents to the Left-Marginalist Worldview believe that the positively-progressing direction

of the evolution of this biological faculty which is latent within each and every human being

is a direct physical function of the data which resides within each and every ultimately

irreducible inchoate quantum field located within our Physical Universe (this Teleological

Belief is a direct function of the Cosmological Belief of this Sixth Paradigm Worldview). It is

this data, this universal information, which drives the evolution upward into a more and more

complex and integrated form of life, taking a new evolutionary step in the positive

development of human life, pursuant to a set of NATURAL LAWS which are purely

PHYSICAL in their nature, (though not yet fully comprehended and not yet fully explicated

by our still limited human scientific community.)

83

Through the physical exercise of this faculty, every human being will, eventually, become

physically capable of experientially discerning (just as they now see the physical phenomenon

of light waves or hear the physical phenomenon of sound waves.) the “waves” which are

generated by each such inchoate quantum field, which taken collectively, make up a single

unified field which constitutes the unistic phenomenon which bonds every irreducible integer

of matter in our entire Physical Universe into one, single harmonious relationship with every

other such integer of matter in the entire Universe. This collective of inchoate and choate

quantum fields forms one MONISTIC UNITY.

VERY IMPORTANTLY, Adherents of the Left- Marginalist position believe that the

physical existence of this latent biological faculty within our human species has been

adequately discovered by our human family – through an exercise of the basic scientific tests

of trial and error and through direct physical experience – so that we realize that this specific

latent biological faculty can be CONSCIOUSLY accessed by every individual human being;

can be CONSCIOUSLY made the central focus of one’s entire conscious experience; and can,

thereby, be CONSCIOUSLY strengthened through exercise (just as one can is able to

consciously increase one’s ability to hear or to see) - if one directs ALL of one’s conscious

attention to the physical experience and to exercising this physical faculty. The strengthening

of this specific new faculty can be achieved, Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview

explain, by means of several very widely known physical exercises. These physical exercises

include: MEDITATION; FASTING; CELIBACY; YOGA EXERCISES; THE

SELF-INFLICTION AND RISING ABOVE OF CERTAIN PHYSICAL PAIN; THE

INGESTION OF CERTAIN NATURAL HERBS AND PLANTS and other activities.

Through the conscious undertaking of these specific exercises to consciously strengthen this

specific biological faculty, Adherents to this Left-Marginalist position believe that each

human being can strengthen this specific latent human faculty to the point at which each

person can personally accelerate this development to the point at which he or she can directly

physically discern the physical phenomenon which bonds every unit of matter in the entire

Physical Universe into a single unitive entity - and, thereby, enable such an individual to be in

direct experiential contact with the harmonizing phenomenon of the Universe in accordance

with which harmony, or in discordance to which, every such human being can judge the right-

ness or the wrong-ness of any given human action, by experientially determining whether that

conduct is harmonious with or – disharmonious to this Universal Physical Harmonious

Phenomenon.

EQUALLY IMPORTANTLY, Adherents to this Sixth Paradigm position believe that General

Principles of Human Conduct and even Specific Forms of Human Conduct - both

INDIVIDUAL and COLLECTIVE - can be identified as being harmonious with or

disharmonious to this Universal Harmonizing Phenomenon. And, they believe that if human

beings can be voluntarily persuaded to comport their conduct - both individual and

collective - in accordance with these General Principles of Human Conduct and with these

Specific Forms of Human Conduct, and by a greater and greater number of individual human

beings, it will itself physically accelerate the arrival of the point in time at which our entire

84

human family will make, together, a quantum leap, evolutionarily, to the next step of human

biological evolution toward which the natural laws of our Physical Universe are drawing us.

Thus, the Adherents of the Left-Marginalist position see the conscious identification and

voluntary compliance on the part of members of our human family with the principles of

natural law to be the method or practice by means of which our human family can - and

ought - to use our natural faculty of the INTELLECT to become FULLY CONSCIOUS

PARTNERS and PARTICIPANTS in our own physical biological human evolution to the

next step in our biological evolution from Homo Sapiens (Thinking Man) to Homo Divinis

(Discerning, or Divining Man). Indeed, this is THE ULTIMATE GREAT IDEA which

Professor Crain Brinton accepted to be known and understood by the greatest mind in

Western Civilization, as being latent within all human beings at the Conclusion of his 50-year

teaching career at Harvard University in April of 1968.

One of the most thorough recent explications of this Sixth Paradigm Belief has been

undertaken by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the French Jesuit and Paleontologist in his 1959

work entitled The Phenomenon of Man.

3.8.3. The Ontological Question

How did sentient consciousness come into being (especially human consciousness)?

Our human species is an integral material (i.e. Mass and Energy- composed) phenomenon

which has NATURALLY occurred within our physical Universe as a direct consequence of

the functioning of the NATURAL LAWS of our Universe pursuant to which, and in

accordance with which (as we can observe through our physical senses and our rational

intellect) the mass and energy within our physical Universe always function.

However, according to the Ontological Belief of Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm

Worldview, there resides within each and every ultimately-irreducible inchoate quantum field

within our Universe a specific datum which physically generates within each human being

seven Energy Fields and immediately above the head of each human being an eighth energy

field. These energy fields are identified in the Sanskrit language as Chakras.

Each of these eight distinct Human Chakras has a specific size and a specific shape. The

energy out of which each such Chakra is made up vibrates at a specific datum-determined

frequency of vibration. Each such Chakra also spins, within our human body, at a specific,

datum-determined rate of rotation. Each such Chakra is tilted to the ecliptic to a specific,

datum-determined degree. And each such Chakra generates an egg-shaped subtle-energy

envelope around our human body which vibrates in sympathetic resonance with the specific

vibrational frequency of the Chakra which generates that energy field.

When each of these eight Chakras is: vibrating at the exact frequency rate which is designated

by the datum which resides within each inchoate quantum field in the Universe (constituting

that ideal information) and when each of these eight Chakras is rotating at the exact rate of

physical rotation which is designated for that specific Chakra by the datum which resides

within each inchoate quantum field in the Universe, and when each of these eight Chakras is

85

tipped at the exact degree of physical tilt to the ecliptic which is designated by the datum

which resides within each inchoate quantum field in the Universe constituting that ideal

information – then the Eighth Chakra Energy Envelope which surrounds the physical human

body which contains those eight specific Chakras will vibrate at a frequency which will be in

direct sympathetic resonance with the specific frequency at which THE BONDING

PHENOMENON OF THE ENTIRE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE vibrates thereby causing that

human body to function exactly like a classical Crystal Radio Receiver, sending from the

Eighth Energy Envelop surrounding that human body a set of energy vibrations which draw

the energy vibrations of each of the other seven Energy Envelops up into perfect sympathetic

vibration with that Eighth Chakra frequency.

These sympathetically vibrating eight Subtle-Energy Fields surrounding that physical body

will then cause each of the respective seven other Chakras within that physical body to vibrate

at the ideal frequency of that Specific Chakra (originally directed by the datum governing that

Chakra which is is contained within each inchoate quantum field.) This will result in that

human body being surrounded in a holographic field which the human brain will read (since

the human brain functions like a holographic field recorder). This experience occurring inside

the human brain within that human body will cause that human being to directly experience a

direct link into the Unified Field which bonds the entire physical Universe together into one,

unified harmonic (indeed Holographic) entity.

Therefore, according to the Ontological Belief of Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Left-

Marginalist Worldview, the Consciousness of each one of us and of our of our entire Human

Species is a NATURAL LAW FUNCTION of the Cosmology which is obtained within our

Physical Universe - which is, therefore, in a sense, a purely MECHANICAL phenomenon.

3.8.4. The Epistemological Question

What are the means by which we as human beings are capable of discerning the facts

that constitute the answer to ultimate cosmic questions such as these?

As RADICAL MONISTS, Adherents of the Left-Marginalist Worldview are operationally

certain that we, as human beings, are capable of learning TRUTH - and NOT just some

relative, partial truth – but ULTIMATE TRUTH – if we are willing to utilize ALL of our

human resources by means of which to discern the Facts. This would include the employment

of one’s entire personal Intellect; all of one’s academic or scholastic learning which one is

able to obtain from the secular academic world; via the consultation of academic experts in

the specific field of study in which the Facts which are desired arise; State authorities

charged, by the Government of the collective community, with obtaining and evaluating data

concerning various factual issues; credible persons with first-hand knowledge of the Facts (if

this is applicable) and direct personal investigation through the application of all scientific

methods of ascertaining the Facts;

BUT ALSO, ACCORDING TO ADHERENTS TO THE SIXTH PARADIGM LEFT-

MARGINALIST WORLDVIEW, by recourse to persons who have developed their latent

86

biological faculty of discernment to an adequate degree by means of which to access The

Unified Field constituted by the Unitive Phenomenon of The Universe… which Adherents to

this Left-Marginalist Worldview believe contains, in some retrievable or discernable form,

ALL OF THE DATA CONTAINED IN THE ENTIRE PHYSICAL COSMOS (present, past

AND FUTURE); AND very importantly, by recourse to THEIR OWN latent faculty of

discernment (in the form of their own INTUITION). It is, indeed, this specific unique

Epistemological Belief of Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview which many identify

as the distinguishing characteristic of Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm. Adherents to The

Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the Epistemological Belief that we, as human beings, possess

seven biological senses (NOT just the five which Adherents to the four center & right of

center Worldviews believe we possess.)

Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview hold the “Epistemological” Belief that we, as

human beings, possess one biological sense for each Chakra which exists inside our human

body. Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe that each such human Chakra

generates a specific vibrational frequency within our human body which is an integral

multiple of the Chakra which resides immediately below that Chakra (from the base of our

spine… all the way to the Eighth Chakra which exists above our material body, at the high-

point of the reach of one’s own arm). Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe

that each of these seven internal Chakras generates an egg-shaped vibrational envelope

around our body and that each of these seven egg-shaped, Chakra-generated envelopes fits

inside the envelope which is generated by the next step higher frequency generated by the

Chakra immediately above that Chakra. Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe

that an Eighth Chakra exists at the apex of the seven concentric vibrational energy-field

“eggs” which enclose our entire physical body, thus existing outside of our physical material

body.

Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe that these seven vibrational envelopes

which surround our human body functioning together generate an OVER TONE which sets

up an EIGHTH vibrational FIELD around the entire set of seven envelopes. And that this

octave set of vibrational fields (each one of the eight frequencies of which is a whole number

multiple of the vibrational frequency of the field which is immediately inside it) together

constitute an OCTAVE SET, the vibrational phenomenon of which actually precipitates our

whole BEING up out of the “Quantum Foam” which vibrates one octave higher than the rate

of vibrational frequency of the Eighth Field of vibration which is generated as an over tone of

the seven inter-acting vibrational envelopes formed by the seven fields which are generated

by the functioning of the Chakras within our body.

Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview believe that we, as human beings, can

experience a unique biological experience by directing our Conscious human attention

directly into each one of the discrete vibrational fields which are generated by each Chakra

and/or by directing our conscious attention directly into each of the discrete vibrational

envelopes which surrounds our human body. The unique experience when we direct our

conscious attention into these discrete vibrational fields within our body and immediately

87

surrounding our physical body is, in fact, (according to Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm

Worldview,) one of our human senses. These are:

“Touch” (within the vibrational field generated by our FIRST CHAKRA);

“Taste” (within the vibrational field generated by our SECOND CHAKRA);

“Smell” (within the vibrational field generated by our THIRD CHAKRA);

“Sight” (within the vibrational field generated by our FOURTH CHAKRA);

“Hearing” (within the vibrational field generated by our FIFTH CHAKRA);

“INTELLECTUAL” PERCEPTION (i.e. the ability to distinguish the difference

between [our SELF and other things, and between one thing and another thing] thus

generating our experience of SELF Consciousness and within the VERY SAME

experience generating our experience of apparent separateness from all of the rest of

“Reality out there”) within the vibrational field generated by our SIXTH CHAKRA; and

“DIRECT UNITIVE EXPERIENCE OF THE ENTIRE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE”

(within the vibrational field generated by our SEVENTH CHAKRA).

Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview take no position as to a human being’s ability to

obtain DIRECT EXPERIENTIAL ACCESS TO ANY INFINITE & ETERNAL SEA OF

TOTALLY UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS.

Thus, it is the Epistemological Belief of Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview that we,

as human beings, possess seven separate and distinct experiential sources by means of which

we can gather and then integrate data from within our physical Universe to discern patterns

manifesting within this sensory data AND BY MEANS OF WHICH WE CAN

(INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY) FUNCTION AS A FIRST CAUSATIVE

SOURCE OF CHANGE WITHIN OUR PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.

3.8.5. Mode of Ethical Reasoning

The distinctive aspect of the Mode of Ethical Reasoning of the Sixth Paradigm Radical

Monist Worldview is that they believe that this FACULTY OF INTUITION (experienced

through the Seventh Chakra) should play a CENTRAL ROLE in each individual human

being’s Normative decision-making or as their Mode of Ethical Reasoning.

Substantively, Adherents to the Left-Marginalist Worldview believe that, when faced with a

range of alternative choices by means of which to address a given public policy problem, one

should choose the form of human conduct which is most harmonious with the NATURAL

LAWS of the physical Universe. The methods by means of which one goes about determining

exactly what specific form of human conduct is harmonious with NATURAL LAW (and what

forms of conduct are expressly dis-harmonious to NATURAL LAW) are determined by the

utilization of the various Methods of Determining The Facts which are set forth above.

However, the central means which should be employed in making this specific decision is to

resort to one’s own personal Intuition.

88

HOWEVER, Once this factual determination has been made by each individual who is a

member of the community which will be directly effected by the public policy choice chosen,

Adherents to the Left-Marginalist Worldview insist that a specific procedural process must

then be employed by means of which the Community ought to determine which choice among

the several available will be chosen. And the utilization of this specific procedure by means of

which to make such an inherently community choice is integral to the Mode of Ethical

Reasoning which is advocated by Left- Marginalists.

The procedure is this:

Every person who is going to be directly or indirectly effected by the public policy choice

which is being made on behalf of the Community must be informed concerning all of the

component elements pertaining to the decision, then be afforded an adequate time period prior

to his or her having to render this decision to educate himself or herself as to what he or she

will need to know to make a fully-prepared choice concerning the matter. Thirdly, every such

person must be given a fair opportunity to express his or her views on the matter and to

attempt to persuade others that his or her view should be adopted by the Community. And

then, finally, every such person who is going to be directly effected by the decision made

must be given the opportunity to vote on which specific public policy choice is going to be

chosen by the community.

This is referred to as a SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC decision-making process. (This process does

NOT require that all such votes be unanimous. Such votes may fairly be determined by a

specific, previously–agreed-upon percentage of the total votes cast or of the total eligible

voting members of the community. This may be a simple majority of one-half plus one; a

plurality; a two-thirds majority, a three-fourths majority – or whatever percentage is deemed

fair by a prior agreement reached by the community prior to the undertaking of this vote).

The need to undertake this process by means of which to make every major public policy

choice effecting each member of the community is the product of a substantive NATURAL

LAW PRINCIPLE itself. So, to Adherents of the Left-Marginalist Worldview, the utilization

of this process is a Natural Law value in and of itself. In effect, this value dictates that there

are instances in which it is ethically preferable to have NO decision made by means of which

to address a given public policy problem which will be enforced by the community upon the

individuals in the community (if no single alternative choice available generates the support

of a specific percentage of the community members) rather than to have a clear choice made

which might solve that specific public policy problem at issue but which is actively opposed

by [or is not affirmatively accepted by] an unacceptably-high percentage of the members of

the community effected.

Thus, there are two equally-important aspects of the distinctive Mode of Ethical Reasoning

which is believed in by Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm Worldview. The first, which is

substantive, is that a Natural Law Ethic be employed (and that each individual utilize, as the

central means by which he or she determines whether a given option is harmonious with

89

Natural Law, that individual person’s Faculty of INTUITION.) The second, which is

procedural, is that the procedure employed by the community to make its collective decision

be Social Democratic (as defined above).

3.9. The Seventh Paradigm Worldview Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological belief that our

physical universe began as the intentional emanation into physical manifestation from and by

the Infinite and Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness.

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological belief that this single

intentional act on the part of the Infinite and Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness

resulted in the manifestation, within the theretofore Infinite and Eternal Sea of

Undifferentiated Consciousness, of first one, and then two singularities (i.e. two distinct

points of dis-equilibrium), one “positive” and the other “negative.”

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview believe that, immediately following the

manifestation of these two points of voltage differential within the otherwise entirely

homogeneous Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness, there flowed between these points a

wave of energy. This wave of energy set up a field of dis-continuity in the vicinity around its

pathway through theSea of Undifferentiated Consciousness. This field then collapsed into the

first particle of mass. This first mass constituted an even greater discontinuity within the

otherwise perfectly homogeneous Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness, thereby generating

around itself an even greater field of discontinuity. This greater field of discontinuity

thereupon collapsed into a second particle.

This process repeated itself, over and over again, until there existed a large number of sub-

atomic particles which eventually condensed into hydrogen (and some helium and lithium)

atoms in the Infinite and Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness.

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview, like adherents to The First Paradigm

Worldview recognize that every complex combination of matter is ultimately disintegrating

into their smaller constituent, ultimately non-divisible units of matter).

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview believe, further, as do adherents to The First

Paradigm Worldview, that each such ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in our physical

universe is, at the same time, repelling itself out and away from every other such ultimately-

irreducible integer of matter in our physical universe.

However, while adherents to The First Paradigm Worldview believe that this

contemporaneously-occurring expansion and disintegration of all matter in our physical

universe has been going on since very early in our physical universe, and that this will

continue to go on up to the point in time at which every single ultimately-irreducible integer

of matter in the entire physical universe (of which adherents to The First Paradigm

90

Worldview believe there exist only a fixed and finite number which were created at the instant

of the original “Big Bang”) will stand separate and apart from each and every other such

ultimately-irreducible integer of matter in the entire physical universe;

while adherents to The Second Paradigm Worldview believe that, at that precise point in time,

the expansion of our physical universe will STOP expanding out and away from the original

locus of the Big Bang, stopping our physical universe from ultimately disintegrating into

nothingness for all the rest of eternity, and believe that, after stopping its theretofore X

billion-year expansion, our physical universe will stand in a state of equilibrium for a brief

moment and it will then begin to collapse back in upon itself , thereupon re-constituting itself

back into singularities; waves of energy; particles of mass, all the way back into planets; stars;

solar systems; star clusters; galaxies etc.;

while adherents to The Third Paradigm Worldview believe that neither of these two

alternative options is a predetermined fact but, rather, believe that whether our physical

universe will expand forever or will ultimately stop and collapse back in upon itself is the

function of an existential choice which is being made every day by individual human beings

by their either lending the power of their mind to the holding of the universe together through

an exercise of their existential hope followed up by their actions taken in accordance with that

hope or their lending the power of their mind to the ultimate disintegration of our universe

through their embracing of despair and their engaging in conduct every day that puts their

despair into action; and adherents to the Fourth Paradigm Worldview believe that any one of

these three alternative hypotheses might well be true – and that some fourth hypothesis might

just as well be true depending entirely upon what the most up-to-date physical data confirms

to be true,

adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview believe that the ultimate destiny of our

physical universe is escatological – that is, that our physical universe is unfolding toward a

single end, this being THE ESCATON.

This Teleological Belief of adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview is best articulated

by Catholic Jesuit Priest Teilhard de Chardin in his work entitled “The Phenomenon of Man.”

Pursuant to this Teleological Belief, adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview believe

that the individuated nodes of Consciousness which are transformed from the Infinite and

Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness through the conditioned state of a singularity

(or an “inchoate quantum field”) into physical units (in the form of “energy” or “mass”) rise

into more and more complex entities of combined mass, energy and consciousness until such

complex collectives become, first, minimal consciousness, then SELF-Conscious collectives,

then SELF-Conscious and conscious (at the same time) of The Infinite and Eternal Sea of

Undifferentiated Consciousness from which they came (and of which they are still a mere

manifestation), then finally, SELF-conscious, conscious of the Infinite and Eternal Sea of

Undifferentiated Consciousness, and capable (at the same time) of one-to-one UNITIVE

91

CONSCIOUSNESS WITH The Infinite and Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated

Consciousness.[2]

This Worldview entails a belief in a type of reincarnation of a single individuated nodule of

Consciousness from an initial primitive degree of consciousness into more and more complex

(i.e. more-and-more highly conscious) confluences of mass, energy and consciousness until

such point that our Earth (our Solar System?, our Galaxy?, our Universe?) is inhabited by

Sentient Beings, a critical mass of which have all reached a state of consciousness at which

the individual members of this species are capable of manifesting material objects out of pure

consciousness – and, thereby, directly effecting physical reality by means of their conscious

attention.

This conscious intentionality, pursuant to this Seventh Paradigm Worldview, plays a direct

role in the Teleology of the physical universe.

Pursuant to the Teleological Belief of adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview, if a

sufficient number (i.e. a “critical mass”) of these sentient species have reached the point in

their biological evolution such that individual members are able to directly effect the physical

matter of the universe through the intentional direction of their consciousness and, at that

point, heed the WILL OF THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF

UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS that each such Being:

(A) Love THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL with whole mind, with whole heart and with

whole soul;

(B) Love each and every other Being as THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL loves each such

Being; and

(C) Seek to do the will of THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL in all things, then this love will

supply the added bonding force in the physical universe such that the physical universe will

not expand out and away forever, but will, once it reaches the state of Absolute Energy (into

which the physical universe will eventually expand) , instead will be drawn back into forming

a physical universe of harmony, beauty, love, happiness and abundance in sympathetic

resonance with the love vibrations sent out into the physical universe by members of this

(these) species during the time of their physical existence within the universe.

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview adhere to an Ontological Belief that Human

Consciousness is in fact an intimate emanation of THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF

UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS which existed before the emanation of

Consciousness into matter.

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview hold the Epistemological Belief that we, as

human beings, have access to a greater truth than that which we can experientially obtain

from raw materialist data which we can directly physically experience through our own

personal five physical senses of touch, taste, smell, sight and hearing. This is because we not

only have the ability, through the exercise of our human mind, to discern patterns within the

92

data which we can then project out beyond the confines of our five physical senses to

ascertain a more complete (i.e. more “perfect”) possible Reality. This projection constitutes

data pertaining to reality which is beyond the reach of our five physical senses and which

reveals more than a mere random function of the inter-play of purely physical forces in a

random universe, indeed more than just a mere dialectical pattern which underlies – and

supersedes – the otherwise apparent chaos of the random universe, so as to present us the

dialectical choice between two available options at each juncture of human decision, thereby

providing us a psychology of choice, a much more satisfactory psychological state of mind

than being mere flotsam of random consciousness in an entirely chaotic physical universe –

and, indeed, more than just a simple physical unity among all of the physical units of matter

within the physical universe. Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview hold the

Epistemological Belief that we, as human beings, have access to total truth by opening the self

in prayer to the very INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF UNDIFFERENTIATED

CONSCIOUSNESS from which we came into this physical universe and within which we

still remain in perfect union.

In its Higher Manifestation, the Seventh Paradigm Worldview generates the Mode of Ethical

Reasoning of The Mystics. Pursuant to this Mode of Ethical Reasoning, one seeks, through

prayer, to know The Will of The Infinite and Eternal and then one, as an empty vessel,

undertakes to act as a mere agent of The Infinite and Eternal Consciousness.

Because of these combined Cosmological, Teleological and Ontological beliefs on the part of

adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview, adherents to The Seventh Paradigm

Worldview adhere to an essentially Theist Philosophy.

The Lower Manifestation of the Seventh Paradigm Worldview generates the Philosophy of

Theism such as that which was championed in Zoroastrian Arabia.

The Higher Manifestation of the Seventh Paradigm Worldview generates the Philosophy of

Theism such as that which was championed in Sufism.

In its Lower Manifestation, The Seventh Paradigm Worldview generates the Mode of Ethical

Reasoning of “Adherence to the Religious Rules of a Divine Order” such as is advocated by.

In its Higher Manifestation, The Seventh Paradigm Worldview generates the Mode of Ethical

Reasoning of “The Discernment of The Will of Allah”, espoused by Sufism.

The Mode of Spiritual Expression of adherents to The Seventh Paradigm is Theism. This

Worldview is manifested in ZOROASTRIANISM and in SUFISM and other religions which

believe in the existence of an “I – Thou” relationship between an individuated Being in

Mystical Unity with THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF UNDIFFERENTIATED

CONSCIOUSNESS (the “I”) and THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF

UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS itself (the “Thou.”)

93

In its Social Form, The Seventh Paradigm Worldview manifests itself, in its Lower

Manifestation, in the form of a THEOCRACY.

In its Higher Manifestation, The Seventh Paradigm Worldview expresses itself in the Social

Form of a THEISTIC UTOPIA.

[1] Though this “process” may need to progress through the “phases” of generating, first,

“nutrinos”; “meuons”; “leptons”; “quarks” etc.

[2] At this point in their “evolution”, such complex “entities” will be capable of “manifesting”

material objects of their own choice out of pure consciousness (just like the original

INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS “created”

THEM out of pure consciousness.) The arriving at this point in “evolution” will, of course,

“confront” such “entities” with “THE ‘LUCIFERIAN’ TEMPTATION” (i.e. the “temptation”

to confuse their-“selves” with THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF

UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS of which they are, in fact, a mere

manifestation.) If, at that critical moment when these complex “entities” have arrived at the

moment in their “evolution” at which they realize that they can “manifest” material objects of

their own out of pure consciousness, a complex “entity” remembers to express “AWE and

WONDER” at her or his state of existence and engages in the act of “AWE and WORSHIP”

of THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL SEA OF UNDEIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS

and then “opens her or his -“self” to the flow of the ‘will’ of THE INFINITE AND

ETERNAL” as the “referent” in accordance with which she or he chooses toexercise her or

his new-found power to manifest material objects out of pure consciousness, then such

“entities”, upon their death in the material universe, will manifestin a beautiful, harmonious,

happy and abundant world (of their own manifestation) – known as PARADISE. They will,

therefore, be “released from” the physical universe. IF, on the other hand, at that specific

moment, others of these complex “entities” forget to recognize THE ININITE AND

ETERNAL as the “referent” in accordance with which said “entities” should make their

“choices as to WHAT“manifestations” to manifest out of pure consciousness, they will

have succumbed to “The Luciferian Temptation.” At the point of their death in the physical

universe, those complex “entities” who succumbed to “The Luciferian Temptation” will

“manifest” back into a new “cycle” of the physical universe…a universe of their own

collective making. Such Beings will be able to enter into the “Paradise” of the making of

those who did “submit” their will to the will of THE INFINITE AND ETERNAL only when

they too have done so during the next “cycle” of the universe.

[3] See the discussion of the “Teleological” Belief of Adherents of The Seventh Paradigm

(“Theistic”) Worldview below at pp. .

[4] i.e. within the period of “Time” between the generation of the original initial “singularity”

within the previously totally “un-differentiated” SEA of Infinite & Eternal Consciousness and

the initial “incarnation” of the first “nodual” of previously un-differentiated Consciousness

into the very first unit of physical “Matter” (i.e. into the very first “choate” quantum field)

94

[5] And to, thereby, come to learn true “compassion” for the plight of “Lucifer” and his

“Fallen” fellow “Angelic Beings” (who “followed” Lucifer in “The Fall” into “Separateness”

from Eternal Undifferentiated Consciousness) and to, thereafter chose to “forgive” them their

“trespass” and to “welcome them back” through our action of un-conditioned Love toward

them, finally knowing what it is that they experienced.

[6] Each of which will be discussed below under the topic of the “Epistemological” Belief of

each such Worldview.

PILLARS OF BELIEF:

3.9.1. The Cosmological Question

How did our physical universe first come into being, and what are the physical laws that

govern its past, present, and future functioning?

With regard to the functioning of the physical Universe, Adherents to the Left-Systemist

position on Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph, like Adherents to the Right-Systemist

position believe that our physical Universe began in a blinding flash of the Big Bang at which

point all matter in the Universe began to expand out-and-away from every other such

ultimately-irreducible integer of matter, and that this expansion of the Universe will continue

until the impetus imposed upon all matter by this Cosmic event is spent.

However, Left-Systemist Adherents believe that our physical Universe originally issued forth

from an Infinite and Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated CONSCIOUSNESS. This Infinite and

Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness simply IS. And it always has been existing.

In this regard, the Cosmological Belief of Adherents to the Seventh Paradigm Worldview

differs from the Cosmological Belief the First Paradigm Worldview, which holds NO such

specific Belief about the initial Source of the physical Universe. And this Cosmological Belief

of Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm (“Theistic”) Worldview differs from the Cosmological

Belief of Adherents to The Second Paradigm (“Dialectical”) Worldview in that Adherents to

The Second Paradigm Worldview hold the Cosmological Belief that the physical Universe

has always existed.

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm (“Theistic”) Worldview hold the Cosmological Belief

that the physical Universe was created at a specific point by The Infinite & Eternal Sea of

Undifferentiated Consciousness and that the physical Universe will exist for a finite amount

of time, just once, from its creation (or “Emanation”) by The Infinite & Eternal Sea of

Undifferentiated Consciousness until “The Purusia” (a point marked not by some physically

preordained event but, instead, a point marked by the achievement of a specific Theological

event… the achievement by our human species (or our progeny) of “Perfect Consciousness”

and (at that point) either our success or our failure in some Cosmic Test which is the ultimate

purpose of the Creation of the physical Universe (and our human species) by The Infinite &

Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness.[3]

95

This is a Cosmological Belief which differs fundamentally from the Cosmological Beliefs of

both Adherents to The First Paradigm Worldview and Adherents to The Second Paradigm

Worldview.

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Worldview believe that the original pre-cursor unit of

“matter” evolved out of an initial discontinuity (or singularity) in the sea of eternal

Undifferentiated Consciousness. In this singularity, the Infinite and Eternal Sea of Un-

differentiated Consciousness is, therefore, BEING. But it is not a noun. It is, rather, a non-

transitive verb of “being.” Most importantly, however, this BEING is not a function of the

physical inter-play of Mass and Energy which makes up the physical Universe.

Rather, the physical Universe is a function of this CONSCIOUSNESS. Indeed, according to

the Cosmology of The Seventh Paradigm Worldview, this CONSCIOUSNESS enfolded into

being the physical Universe, in the form of the original dis-continuity which pre-existed the

“BIG BANG”. Pursuant to the process which was discussed in the First Paradigm

Cosmology, Adherents to this Seventh Paradigm Worldview believe that this original dis-

continuity evolved into the original unit of matter, and this unit of matter contained within it

all of the sum total of all “Matter” in the Universe (compacted down into a state of Absolute

Mass).

This CONSCIOUSNESS exists outside of the physical Universe. But the physical Universe

is, indeed, made up of Consciousness, merely manifest in a different form, i.e. matter.

This CONSCIOUSNESS is infinite in volume, filling all space beyond the physical

boundaries of the physical Universe (whether the physical Universe is manifesting itself, at

any given point in time, in its Ultimately- Expanded form of Absolute Energy, in its

Ultimately- Contracted form of Absolute Mass - or in any of its many interim forms of

MIXED-Mass and Energy).

This “CONSCIOUSNESS” of The Cosmos (which is not actually of The Universe at

all - because it preceded, indeed, pre-existed the physical Universe) stands above and outside

of “Time,” merely observing all “Time”.

Adherents to the Left-Systemist position along Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph

are, then, “THEISTS.”

Very importantly, such Theists believe that this INFINITE SEA OF UNDIFFERENTIATED

CONSCIOUSNESS is capable of Physically INTERVENING in the material Universe - to set

aside, or to temporarily abridge, the functioning of the natural laws of physics which

otherwise operate automatically within the Universe.

One need only request The Deity to so intervene on one’s behalf. The most thorough recent

explication of this “Emanationist” Cosmological Belief has been set forth by Professor Robert

Boehm in his work entitled The Implicate Order.

96

3.9.2. The Teleological Question

Is there a specific direction in which our physical universe is unfolding, and if there is,

what is the role of our human species, if any, in this unfolding?

The human species stands in a unique relationship to the Universe - and to The Infinite Sea of

Undifferentiated Consciousness from which the physical Universe was enfolded into being.

Indeed, all of “history” is simply the unfolding of the consciousness of the human family into

unity with The Infinite Consciousness of The Universe.

Thus, the very reason for the Universe is to provide a medium within which the human

species can draw itself into the state of “perfection” which will manifest itself at the point in

history at which a critical mass of the human family reach the self-conscious state of knowing

that our self-consciousness is ONE WITH THE INFINITE CONSCIOUSNESS. The

Left-Systemists are, indeed, the Ultimate Champions of the idea of “The Perfectibility of The

Species in God”. Indeed, it is the arrival at this point in history which will mark the ONLY

true “End of History.”

Indeed, while The Infinite and Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness is not a “human

being”, it is “BEING” and, from outside Itself, It would be perceived as A“BEING” (i.e. a

NOUN) even though it is only a VERB. However, perceived as a Noun, this Infinite and

Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness (or “BEING”) intends that our Human Species

perfect ourselves. As if It wills it. Whereas, in actuality, It merely causes this to occur.

The question occurs as to The Direction this Consciousness into Matter Process is taking.

This question of purpose, in the classical Theological Worldview, translates into the following

Myth. The question is; What does this ‘Myth’ mean?

First, The Myth:

It is asserted, within the Teleological Belief System of the Classical Theist, that The Infinite

& Eternal Sea of Un-Differentiated Consciousness, i.e. “The Godhead”; i.e. “The ONE

‘Thing’ That Is NOT a ‘Thing’ Among Other ‘Things’ ”; “The Unbegotten Being” generated

the initial singularity so that BEING might experience infinite & eternal Unitive Being “More

Abundantly.”

The only way to do this was to experience differentiation (along with its intrinsic anxiety and

tension) so that, after the differentiation, Infinite & Eternal Being would be capable of

experiencing more than in its original Infinite and Eternal configuration.

However, as a remnant of that original experience of differentiation, the Infinite & Eternal

Un-differentiated Consciousness generated the present Physical Universe, along with Sentient

Beings. This experience is The Creation of THE BEING OF LIGHT (Lucifer) a

differentiated BEING which possessed total Free Will from The Infinite & Eternal BEING,

and who fell prey to THE TEMPTATION to exercise the ability of Infinite Being (to manifest

whatever form of physical “reality” said Being wished to manifest) BUT WITHOUT

PAYING HEED TO the fact that said Infinite Being was, in fact, “Created Being” (Created

by Infinite & Eternal BEING) indeed, without acknowledging that said Infinite Being ought

97

to exercise its Infinite Power of Manifestation only in accordance with The Will of THE

INFINITE & ETERNAL BEING, as an act of complete Free Will (as the perfectly

appropriate response to the “Awe & Worship”) to which INFINITE & ETERNAL BEING

was entitled as a matter of Cosmic harmony.

So, when the “Created” failed to recognize, through “Awe & Worship”, that it should exercise

even its perfect FREE WILL in full accord with THE WILL of INFINITE & ETERNAL

CONSCIOUSNESS, said “Created” was banished forever from the presence of INFINITE &

ETERNAL CONSCIOUSNESS.

However – even though the “Created” could never, through its own action redeem itself,

INFINITE & ETERNAL CONSCIOUSNESS chose to try it one more time, again generating

a singularity in THE FIELD of INFINITE & ETERNAL CONSCIOUSNESS, and allowing

this second “Created Being” to have access to the same temptation and, by experiencing this

same temptation and overcoming it, have an opportunity to know compassion through the

original “Created” and, through the second “Created Being’s” demonstration of love and

compassion toward all of those who know the temptation of true evil, and succumb to it,

including toward the original “Created” grant to the original “Created” the forgiveness of

which IT had not been originally capable.

THIS, then, is the purpose of The Creation (or the Teleological objective) of the Universe,

according to the Left-Systemist Worldview.

Now, what does this Myth mean? What it means is this:

Adherents to the Classical Theist Worldview believe that temporally[4], and prior to the

initial physical incarnation of previously Infinite and Eternal Consciousness into the very first

unit of physical matter (i.e. into the very first “Choate” quantum field which condensed out of

the “quantum foam” of The Infinite & Eternal Sea of Un-Differentiated Consciousness into

the very first “Singularity”), the Infinite & Eternal Sea of undifferentiated Consciousness had

previously generated a differentiation of consciousness which had NO physical dimension

whatsoever, but which did have some degree of separateness from the original Infinite &

Eternal SEA of previously Totally Undifferentiated Consciousness. This was LUCIFER.

This Initial Being was capable of creating other Beings, which it did, in the form called

“Angelic Beings.” This Initial Being (which existed only in a non-physical dimension prior to

the creation of our physical Universe) became so enamored of its ability to create other

“Beings” and phenomena that this “Initial Being” actually began to perceive its self as not

dependent upon The Infinite & Eternal SEA of Previously-Undifferentiated BEING (i.e.

Undifferentiated Consciousness). This perception on the part of this Initial Being caused a

cleft – or separation – to occur between The Infinite & Eternal Sea of Previously-Totally

Undifferentiated Consciousness and this Initial Being. Experiencing this cleft, this Initial

Being had the choice of turning back toward Infinite & Eternal Undifferentiated

Consciousness (thereby yielding itself back to Infinite & Eternal Un-Differentiated

Consciousness) through the act of “AWE & WORSHIP” and thereby losing its “SELF,” or

98

choosing to turn away from Infinite & Eternal Undifferentiated Consciousness, re edifying its

“SELF” as separate and apart from Infinite & Eternal Undifferentiated Consciousness. This

was done simply by withholding the conscious act of “AWE & WORSHIP” from Infinite &

Eternal Undifferentiated Consciousness (which remained with, indeed within, the Initial

Being – even while it was able to experience being a separate & distinct Consciousness.)

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Theist Worldview hold the Teleological Belief that this

Initial Being chose the second course of action because it became enamored in being able to

create manifestations out of “Consciousness,” not of the experience of Being “separate and

apart.”

This is “THE GREAT LUCIFERIAN TEMPTATION, according to the Belief system of

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Theist Worldview. It is the will to power, the attachment

to wanting to be GOD… i.e. loosing one’s immediate experience of “AWE & WORSHIP” of

Infinite & Eternal Undifferentiated Consciousness while still being in an actual state of de

facto “separateness.” And nothing will threaten to bring on this state of loosing one’s direct

and immediate experience of “AWE & WORSHIP” of Infinite & Eternal Undifferentiated

Consciousness quite like the act of creating actual manifestations out of Consciousness (i.e.

directly out of the “Quantum Foam” of The Infinite & Eternal SEA of Undifferentiated

Consciousness.)

And this is the next step in biological evolution which our human species homo sapiens is on

the very brink of entering upon, as we reach into the very heart of matter in our quest to

explore the Quantum Field. This quest is a search for a source of power, and the source of

“Infinite BEING.” Or, more to the point, seeking the source of “Infinite Being” to re-

experience the original LUCIFERIAN TEMPTATION and this time succeed where Lucifer

and his followers originally failed[5] by overcoming the temptation.

This will be accomplished by being able to love every other human being and every other

sentient Being, no matter how evil (or “Fallen”) they appear to be (i.e. how attached they

appear to be to asserting their power over created reality) because we can continue to perceive

within them Infinite & Eternal BEING no matter how masked this BEING is from us in our

apparently separate state.

Or we, as homo sapiens, may fail – as The Initial Being and its followers failed… casting

ourselves into eternal separateness… by physically destroying ourselves through an errant

attempt to direct the technology through which we access this realm of the “Quantum Foam”

toward physical destruction of some “Ultimate Other” or, perhaps, even through an errant

attempt to direct this technology toward a creative act (of creating material manifestations out

of the realm of the Inchoate Quantum Field into material reality… and become so enamored

of our power that we create the source of our own destruction in a manner which separates our

Consciousness from The Infinite & Eternal Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness… thus

causing us, as The Infinite & Eternal’s Second Creation, not only to fail in our intended

mission (of potentially redeeming the Being of Light and its fallen followers) but to join the

99

fallen in a self-created eternal state of separateness from Infinite & Eternal Undifferentiated

Consciousness.

The most thorough recent explication of this Theistic evolutionary Teleological Belief has

been set forth by the Jesuit paleontologist Teilhard de Chardin in the following work: The

Phenomenon of Man (Harper, New York, 1959);

3.9.3. The Ontological Question

How did sentient consciousness come into being (especially human consciousness)?

As one can foretell from the above discussion of the Cosmological and Teleological Beliefs of

Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Theistic Worldview, the Cosmic Question as to how

human consciousness came into being is answered in the Seventh Paradigm Worldview by the

belief that each manifestation of human consciousness is, indeed, a node of the Infinite &

Eternal Sea of previously Undifferentiated Consciousness… which, Itself, has always existed.

The dynamic by means of which these apparently separate nodes of human consciousness

came into separate materially incarnated physical being is explained by the answer to the

Teleological Question.

The ultimate source of human consciousness is explained by the answer to the Cosmological

Question governing the source of the physical Universe. Human Consciousness, like the

physical Universe in which we presently find human consciousness incarnated, is made up of

a temporarily differentiated portion of the original Infinite & Eternal Sea of previously

Undifferentiated Consciousness. But IT has always existed… even though said consciousness

has not always possessed a physical manifestation.

This, then, is the answer which Adherents to The Seventh Paradigm Theistic Worldview

provide to the Ontological Question as to the source of human consciousness.

3.9.4. The Epistemological Question

What are the means by which we as human beings are capable of discerning the facts

that constitute the answer to ultimate cosmic questions such as these?

Adherents to the Left-Systemist position along Professor Parsons’ Sociological Bar Graph

(The Seventh Paradigm Theistic Worldview) believe in the utilization of every means which

is available to the human being by means of which to determine the facts, truth and reality.

This would include one’s own individual experience through all five of the traditional

physical human senses acknowledged by Adherents to The First Paradigm Worldview; the

core Intellectual insight recognized by Adherents to The Second Paradigm Worldview as an

additional source of factual data; the four additional Epistemological means recognized by

Adherents to the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Paradigm Worldviews [6], and also the

phenomenon of personal and collective recourse to prayer to gain access to the truth. This

practice of prayer takes the form of personally asking The Infinite and Eternal Sea of

Undifferentiated Consciousness to communicate what the facts are.

100

A second form which this practice of prayer takes is the undertaking of a very special practice

of Adherents of the Left-Systemist position of engaging in a conscious effort of allowing the

boundaries of their individuated consciousness to “dissolve away” and to, thereby open

themselves to the Unitive Consciousness of The Infinite and Eternal Sea [which these

adherents believe pervades not only the infinite reaches of Space outside of the physical

parameters of the physical Universe, but which is also located within every point of the

manifest material Universe as well - therefore being always and everywhere present and

available as a source of factual knowledge of the data relating to all material things and events

within the Universe – as well as outside the physical Universe.

It is this additional access to purely factual data pertaining to the internal events and goings on

inside and outside of the physical Universe that the adherents of the Left-Systemist position

bring to the task of determining the facts which sets them apart, categorically, from others

engaged in this same inquiry.

3.9.5. Mode of Ethical Reasoning

Every decision made by a systematic Adherent to the Left- Systemist Worldview is made

pursuant to an adherent’s effort to discern the will of God pertaining to that decision - that is:

to determine (through an exercise of all methods of determining the facts [including one or

both of the modalities of prayer identified therein] ) what particular choice, from among those

which are available to the adherent, is most consistent with the will of the Infinite and Eternal

Sea of Undifferentiated Consciousness which enfolded into being the entire physical

Universe, which entirely pervades every point of this material Universe at every moment, and

to which each such adherent owes his or her very continuing life - so as to comport his

perfecting of the Human Family… and which It has intended since the moment at which It

enfolded into being this physical Universe.

3.10. The Eighth Paradigm Worldview This worldview is not yet fully realized by our human family, although there are examples

throughout history of individuals attaining it, people who we think of as prophets, messiahs.

Some of the ideas behind this Eighth Paradigm Worldview are explored further at Open Skies

Ministries (http://openskiesministry.org).

The Eighth Paradigm Cosmology necessarily implies that our physical Universe is filled with

Intelligent, Sentient Life. The Latin root of the word “Intelligence” is intellectus, the ability to

distinguish the difference between. Intrinsic to The Eighth Paradigm Cosmology, Intelligent

Life existswithin each band of vibrational frequencies, indeed, such Intelligent Life is the

Conscious organizer of experience within each such band of vibrational frequencies. Thus, for

there to be other Sentient, Intelligent Life Forms within our galaxy – who/which have

developed technological means of entering the band of vibrational frequencies in which WE

abide is entirely foreseeable, indeed likely.

101

Therefore, the fact that we, as human beings, have been encountering other mysterious Life

Forms…which seem to come into our world fromsomewhere else is entirely compatible with

the Cosmological assumptions of The Eighth Paradigm. And it is also entirely compatible

with the Cosmological assumptions of The Eight Paradigm that these other Beings would

display abilities significantly different from the physical abilities which we human beings are

physically capable of performing, “trapped” as we are within the simple three dimensions of

our limited physical experience.

[1] As to why this first singularity (or initial voltage differential) occurred within the

theretofore otherwise Infinite And Eternal SEA OF UNDIFFERENTIATED

CONSCIOUSNESS is the ultimate Teleological Question… or Question of Purpose and

Ultimate Direction of Manifest Reality. (The ONLY sound answer for this question I have

been able to discern is this: That this original dis-equilibrium was initiated by The Infinite &

Eternal Sea of Un-Differentiated CONSCIOUSNESS because the ONLY WAY to improve

upon the theretofore eternal and theretofore monolithic experience of ABSOLUTE &

ETERNAL BLISS was to generate a temporary dis-equilibrium (the negative experience of

which would have generated an increased dimension of “BLISS” to the prior State of

ABSOLUTE & ETERNAL BLISS which had preceded that temporary negative experience.

This is an extra- Cosmic explanation of the “purpose of evil” (disequilibrium or

imperfection).

[2] until which point in time ALL of one’s human time and attention should be spent and

directed toward the task of “perfecting” the vibrational frequency of ALL EIGHT of the

Chakras located within one’s own physical body.

[3] which is, in turn, an OVER TONE projected into our physical Cosmos of The

Fundamental Frequency of the single Wave Length phenomenon which originally

occurredbetween the first two SINGULARITIES (or voltage differentials) within the original

(Eternal and Infinite) Sea of Originally Entirely Un-Differentiated CONSCIOUSNESS.

PILLARS OF BELIEF:

3.10.1. The Cosmological Question

How did our physical universe first come into being, and what are the physical laws that

govern its past, present, and future functioning?

Among the very minuscule number of individual human beings who have ever gained access

to The Eighth Paradigm of human experience among the 12 Billion human beings who have

lived over the past millions of years, these few Fully Realized human beings have come to

realize that the physical universe which we “see”, “touch”, “taste”, “smell” and “hear” is fully

and completely subject to “Intention.”

This means that such Fully Realized human beings can alter the Natural Laws of our physical

Universe. Such Fully Realized human beings can manifest physical mass out of simple

Energy Fields. They can turn one element of physical matter into a different element of

physical matter. They can levitate; They can walk on water; They can change water into

102

wine; They can manifest bread & fish; They can heal the sick simply by touching them.

Indeed, they can raise the dead to life.

BUT, there have been only a very few of these Fully Realized Beings. But they have existed.

And one or more probably exist in the world today. Said few Fully Realized human beings

can move their conscious energy between the Eighth Paradigm vibrational frequency within

our octave of Being and the first “vibrational frequency” of thenext octave of Being which

exists within our physical Universe.

Thus the COSMOLOGY known to these few Fully Realized human Beings is a Cosmology

within which there exist multiple vibrational fields (each field of which is made up of an

“octave” of frequencies) which can be discerned [i.e. directly experienced] by living Sentient

Beings who exist within that field via experiences which are analogous to “seeing”, “hearing”,

“smelling”, “touching” and “tasting” but which are different than “seeing”, “hearing”,

“smelling”, “touching” or “tasting.” And within these various fields (or spectrums) of

frequencies, there exist certain Sentient Beings who can speed up or slow down those

frequencies to cause them to manifest different experiences to theother Sentient Beings within

that field of vibrations.

This COSMOLOGY is a huge (indeed Cosmic) fugue of experience – NOT just Sound; NOT

just Light; NOT just Smell; NOT just tactile experience; NOT just Taste; NOT just differing

experiences of Consciousness… BUT ALL OF THESE EXPERIENCES… AND MANY,

MANY MORE. Within this COSMOLOGY, there are “Sentient Actors”, functioning on an

entire octave of “levels of Consciousness” all of whom directly effect the manifestations

which occur within these bands of frequency… some effecting said vibrations greatly and

consciously, some effecting said vibrations only minutely and with absolutely minimal

consciousness.

This is a COSMOLOGY of fantastic vibrational harmonies, of periodic and localized

vibrational cacophonies; of brilliant displays of beautiful colors, sounds, tastes, tactile

sensations, smells, experiences of consciousness and other experiences entirely unknown to

our human species…ALL of which are subject to varying degrees of control on the part of

Sentient Beings of differing degrees of concentrated Consciousness throughout the Universe.

These harmonies generate overtones and undertones of sound, light, smell, tactile sensation,

taste, and of Consciousness (therefore of BEINGS) and of theother experiences of which we

human beings are totally ignorant…these overtones and undertones of BEING(S) themselves

being capable of effecting the vibrational frequencies which they encounter…thereby

generating additional overtones and undertones of experience….including additional

overtones and undertones of other levels of BEING.

These fully realized human beings who have accessed this Eighth Paradigm of human

existence have ALL come to share the uniform COSMOLOGICAL BELIEF that the sum total

of ALL of the overtones and undertones of ALL of these experiences which are taking place

103

within our physical Universe generate (and are generated by) ONE HUGE ALL-

ENCOMPASSING OVERTONE OF CONSCIOUS BEING.

THIS is the COSMOLOGY of The Eighth Paradigm Worldview.

3.10.2. The Teleological Question

Is there a specific direction in which our physical universe is unfolding, and if there is,

what is the role of our human species, if any, in this unfolding?

It is the Teleological Belief…and teaching… of those few fully realized human beings who

have accessed this Eighth Paradigm of human existence that this fugue of CONSCIOUS

EXPERIENCE ALWAYS IS and that its Teleology is symphonic… that is: this “fugue of

Consciousness” progresses and regresses pursuant to principles which the fully realized

human beings have attempted to convey to we other less Conscious human beings through the

analogy of the principles of MUSIC. Symphonic music manifests the principles of the

teleology of the Universe.

The Teleology of the Eighth Paradigm Universe is also mathematical, that is, it is: algebraic,

geometric, algorithmic and calculus-like. It is also spectral. But it is ALWAYS BEING.

Therefore, its Teleology is a matter of perspective. From within each band of vibrational

frequency within the Universe, the Teleology of the Universe will appear differently…

depending entirely upon the vibrational frequency from within which one experiences it. But,

in its ultimate Teleology, the Universe of The Eighth Paradigm is harmonic and symphonic.

That is: It consists of wave-function sets, and the frequencies within that “set” are integral

whole-number multiples of the frequency of one fundamental wave length which is contained

within that “set.”

(See e.g. The Mysticism of Sound: The Cosmic Language by Hazrat Inayat Khan.)

3.10.3. The Ontological Question

How did sentient consciousness come into being (especially human consciousness)?

It follows from the Cosmological and Teleological Beliefs of Adherents to The Eighth

Paradigm Worldview that the Ontological Belief of Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm

Worldview is that Consciousness within our physical Universe is a direct harmonic and

symphonic OVER TONE wave function of the fundamental frequency of The Consciousness

of The Cosmos… and the “Fundamental Frequency” of The Consciousness of The Cosmos is

an overtone of The Fundamental Frequency of the single wavelength phenomenon which

occurred between the first two SINGULARITIES (or voltage differentials) which occurred

within the original (Eternal and Infinite) Sea of Entirely UN-differentiated

CONSCIOUSNESS.[1]

Thus, simply put, Human Consciousness occurs within our physical Cosmos because its

vibrational frequency is an integral whole-number multiple of the fundamental wave length of

CONSCIOUSNESS OF OUR COSMOS. This fundamental wavelength is, in turn, an

104

overtone projected into our physical Cosmos of the Fundamental Frequency of the single

Wave Length phenomenon which originally occurred between the first SINGULARITIES (or

voltage differentials) which occurred within the original (Eternal and Infinite) Sea of Entirely

Un-Differentiated CONSCIOUSNESS. But human consciousness is only one such whole-

number multiple of the fundamental wave length of CONSCIOUSNESS OF OUR COSMOS.

There are others. These others manifest as animals, plants, bacteria, molecules, atoms, all the

way down to “Inchoate Quantum Fields,” indeed within every naturally-occurring entity in

our physical Universe. Each entity is the manifestation of CONSCIOUSNESS in ONE of its

whole-number multiples of the ONE Fundamental Frequency.

3.10.4. The Epistemological Question

What are the means by which we as human beings are capable of discerning the “facts”

that constitute the answer to ultimate cosmic questions such as these?

Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview hold the Epistemological Belief that we, as

human beings, possess eight biological senses (not just the five which Adherents to the four

Center & Right of Center Worldviews believe we possess…and not just the six which

Adherents to The Fifth Paradigm Worldview and Adherents to The Sixth Paradigm

Worldview believe that human beings possess.)

Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview hold the Epistemological Belief that we, as

human beings, possess one biological sense for each Chakra which exists within our human

body. Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview believe that each such human Chakra

generates a specific vibrational frequency within our human body which is an integral whole-

number multiple of the Chakra which resides within our physical body immediately below

that Chakra (from the base of our spine upward in our human body… all the way to the

Eighth Chakra [which exists above our material body, at the high-point of the reach of one’s

arm.]) Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview believe that each of these seven internal

Chakras generates an egg-shaped “vibrational envelope” around our body and that these seven

egg-shaped, Chakra-generated “envelopes” fits inside the envelope which is generated by the

next higher frequency generated by the Chakra immediately above it. Adherents to The

Eighth Paradigm Worldview believe that an Eighth Chakra exists at the apex of the seven

concentric vibrational “eggs” which enclose our physical body, thus existing outside our

material body.

Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview believe that these seven egg-shaped

“vibrational envelopes” which surround our human body together generate an “OVER

TONE” which sets up an EIGHTH vibrational field around the seven envelopes.

Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview believe that this Octave Set of vibrational

fields (each of the eight vibrational frequencies is one whole-number multiple of the

vibrational frequency of the field which is immediately inside and below it) together

constitute an OCTAVE SET, the vibrational phenomenon of which actually precipitates our

105

whole BEING out of the “Quantum Foam” which vibrates at one integral whole-number

multiple rate of vibrational frequency above the rate of vibrational frequency of the Eighth

Field of vibration (which is generated as an OVER TONE of the seven inter-acting vibrational

frequencies which occur within the egg-shaped envelope formed around our physical body

generated by the functioning of the Chakras within our body).

Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview believe that we, as human beings, have access

to a unique biological experience by directing our Conscious human attention directly into

each one of the discrete vibrational fields which are generated by each Chakra within our

human body and/or by directing of conscious attention directly into each of the discrete

vibrational envelopes which surround our human body. The unique experience which we

access when we direct our conscious attention into each of these discrete vibrational fields

within our body and/or immediately surrounding our body is ONE of our human senses.

These are:

“Smell” (within the vibrational field generated by our FIRST CHAKRA);

“Taste” (within the vibrational field generated by our SECOND CHAKRA);

“Sight” (within the vibrational field generated by our THIRD CHAKRA);

“Touch” (within the vibrational field generated by our FOURTH CHAKRA);

“Hearing” (within the vibrational field generated by our FIFTH CHAKRA);

“INTUITION”: DIRECT UNITIVE EXPERIENCE OF THE ENTIRE PHYSICAL

UNIVERSE (within the vibrational field generated by our SIXTH CHAKRA); and

“INTELLECTUAL PERCEPTION” (i.e. the ability to distinguish the difference

between [our “SELF” and other “things” and between one “thing” and an “other” thing]

thus generating our experience of Self Consciousness and within the very same experience

generating an apparent separateness from all of the rest of “Reality” out there, within the

vibrational field generated by our SEVENTH CHAKRA);

“DIRECT UNDIFFERENTIATED EXPERIENTIAL ACCESS TO THE INFINITE

& ETERNAL SEA OF TOTALLY UN-DIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS –

and MANIFESTATION” (within the vibrational field generated by our EIGHTH

CHAKRA.)

Thus, it is the Epistemological Belief of Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview that

we, as human beings, possess eight separate and distinct experiential sources by means of

which we can gather, discriminate and then integrate data both inside and outside our physical

Universe by means of which we can discern patterns manifesting within this sensory data,

AND BY MEANS OF WHICH WE CAN (INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY)

FUNCTION AS A CAUSATIVE SOURCE OF CHANGE WITHIN OUR PHYSICAL

UNIVERSE.

3.10.5. Mode of Ethical Reasoning

Adherents to The Eight Paradigm Worldview believe that, once one has perfected the

vibrational frequency of each of the EIGHT human Chakras which are located within one’s

own physical body [2], one should direct one’s physical body (and all of one’s material and

106

non-material vibrational fields) to the task of maintaining… or to re-integrating into

symphonic harmony all of the disparate multiples of CONSCIOUSNESS occurring within the

specific time period of the physically incarnated Life into which one finds oneself born within

this physical Universe – because these multiples of CONSCIOUSNESS are supposed to be

vibrating in symphonic harmony with one another as stepped whole-number multiples within

ONE OCTAVE of the ONE fundamental wave length of THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF OUR

COSMOS which is occurring within our physical Universe.[3]

Therefore, Adherents to The Eighth Paradigm Worldview believe that the ONLY truly ethical

human conduct is conduct which is directed to the task of either bringing into perfect

symphonic harmony ALL Eight of the Chakras within one’s own human body or (that having

been already achieved) directing all of one’s conscious attention to the task of maintaining…

or re-integrating into symphonic harmony all of the disparate multiples of Consciousness

occurring in one’s world during one’s lifetime.

4. E.T. Consciousness

4.1. The Need for a New „Eighth Paradigm” Worldview

THE NEED FOR A NEW “EIGHTH PARADIGM” THEOLOGICAL WORLDVIEW

The theology of any given human worldview plays a central role as the purveyor of a set of

beliefs concerning what goes on outside of the physical parameters of our universe. These

beliefs coalesce into the pillar beliefs of any world view: cosmology, teleology, ontology, and

epistemology.

These pillar beliefs undergo a radical change as a direct result of the discovery of the fact that

we are not the only intelligent and technologically advanced species. Indeed we may well be

less evolved intellectually, technologically, and spiritually than other species in our own

galaxy.

The resulting mode of ethical reasoning that results from these pillar beliefs occasions the

development of new philosophical and theological systems. This new theology will,

necessarily, require a new ministry to spread the details of this new set of perspectives about

our species and our place in the galaxy and the wider universe.

We can expect all of the current traditional modes of spiritual practice will try to

accommodate this new post-contact reality. However, the radical transformation of all areas

of human endeavor and knowledge will require a new internally consistent theological

framework consistent with the Eighth Paradigm world view.

107

4.1.1. Current Theologies Cannot Be Adapted Well

The current traditional modes of spiritual practice, as institutions, will try to amend their

traditional theologies to try to include these radically new aspects of reality. However, the

new human culture that will be generated by the integration of the key aspects of these two

major alterations in our human reality in the 21st century into all of the disparate fields of

human knowledge calls for the formulation of a new and thoroughly self-consistent world

view with its own unique theology.

4.1.2. The Need to Start Now

In order to avoid having our human theologies swept aside or subsumed into an

extraterrestrial one, then we need to begin to develop the specifics of a new theology which

assumes that we are not necessarily the central focus of the unfolding of the cosmos.

4.1.3. Setting the Stage for Disclosure

Once we show political and religious leaders that there is a way to adjust our own secular and

spiritual worldviews to accommodate the scientific insights of quantum mechanics and other

intelligent life forms, we can create a climate for disclosure of the contact information they

may have. Without our initiative, these leaders will try to create a new worldview that saves

current institutions and their prerogatives.

4.1.4 Creating More Accountable Institutions

The creation of our own secular and spiritual post-contact worldview can give humans a

central position of importance and political leverage regarding communication with extra-

terrestrials. Without our initiative the information channels will continue to be controlled by

elites and used to protect their current status.

4.1.5. The Need for An Outreach Ministry

We need to establish an active outreach ministry which is organized and dedicated to

preparing the way for first contact or its announcement. This will minimize or at least cushion

the shock of this event on our political and religious structures and human culture. By

preparing for this inter-stellar encounter, we should decrease the need for any attempt to hide

or manipulate this event by those in a position to do so. In addition we hope to create an

environment that is not hostile so that there will be no attempt to stave off contact.

4.1.6. Readiness for Contact

Our work to develop and spread the Post-Contact Eighth Paradigm world view has the

possibility to show intelligent extra-terrestrial life forms that we are preparing for contact in a

way to reduce hostility and fear.

4.1.7. The Most Important Reason

The most important reason why we need a new post contact “Eighth Paradigm” worldview is

to motivate those who do believe that there is a very real spiritual dimension to reality to work

out the very best reasons why people should not lose faith in the cosmic role and importance

of the human species. This will be even more critical if we encounter intelligent life forms

which are significantly more evolved than we are.

108

4.1.8. A Cosmic Theology

In the unlikely event that the extra-terrestrials we encounter do not have a theology, we will

need a cosmic or non-homo sapiens centered theology to share with them. Otherwise we will

not have a theology to share with them which will have any relevance to them. Their lack of a

theology could lead humans to view this other species as inferior and to create a climate of

hostility with potentially violent repercussions.

4.1.9. A Good Thing to Do in Any Event

The creation and spread of a cosmic theology which is not focused exclusively on humans

will be a positive step forward for humanity. We can develop a better sense of what is true.

We can develop a notion human spirituality from a fresh perspective, freed from perspectives

and formulations of the distant past in which we are still largely ensnared.

Clearly, a wooden casting off of all such traditional antecedents would be unwise since we

could throw out “the baby with the bathwater.” Although, this is a task that will take a lot of

effort, the development of a theological construct which allows for and assumes the presence

of other intelligent life forms, it is a valuable undertaking in its own right regardless of when

we may encounter others from across the stars.

4.1.10. Improving Our Standing in the Cosmos

One of the best reasons for developing an Eighth Paradigm theology and spirituality is to

show other intelligent life forms, when we encounter them, that we have some level of

sophistication. In short, we can show, that we are not primitives and that we articulate a view

of the cosmos that includes other intelligent life forms.

4.1.11. The Role of the New Paradigm Institute

While it is understandable that, upon the first publicly confirmed contact with extra-

terrestrials, attention will turn immediately to the question of what steps will have to be

undertaken by governmental officials to responsibly respond to this extraordinary event.

Another portion of our human family will have to address the social, psychological,

philosophical and theological impact that this extraordinary event is going to have on our

planetary society in order to sway the governmental response in a positive direction. Indeed, it

is very possible that it will become necessary to have this latter popular response drive our

government’s response away from a direction than they might otherwise be inclined to

undertake pursuant to their own instincts.

4.1.12. Who Will Undertake This Task?

The public statement issued by The Catholic Church in October of 2009 provides some

grounds for hope that the institutional churches within our human culture might mobilize in

time to undertake this important service to our human family. However, the history of

churches and religious organizations over the centuries is not encouraging. Indeed, specific

overtures made to the institutional churches within the past two decades to begin to

responsibly plan for and prepare for this experience have not been well received. This raises

the distinct likelihood that our current religious institutions will not adequately prepare our

human family for first contact. They are unlikely to educate or mobilize their members and a

109

critical mass of humanity to take the steps necessary to influence military and political

institutions to handle first encounter in a more supple and intelligent manner

Therefore, some other, appropriately sophisticated, UFO-aware, philosophical and theological

human movement must provide both a stimulus and a vehicle for the necessary philosophical

and theological discussions. This discussion will have to be generated and undertaken among

our civilian population in order to provide the positive motive force that will be necessary to

stop our political and military institutions from reacting inappropriately to this inter-stellar

encounter.

Might not this service be most-responsibly provided by the International UFO Congress

Community?

4.2. Theological Implications

4.2.1. The Nature of Theological Questions in General

We define theological questions – in general – as questions which seek to acquire knowledge

about the most the most fundamental truths to explain what is going on – if anything – outside

or inside our physical universe that is beyond our perception. To answer these questions can

be done purely within philosophy. This is called metaphysics – the study of the underlying

principles that explain and give meaning to the physical world.

To deal with these questions from the standpoint of religious experience, spirituality, or a

formal religious belief system is theology. For our purposes here, I will gloss over the fine

points of these distinctions between metaphysics, the philosophy of God, and theology since

for most people the every day common sense world is divided into rational scientific or

philosophical questions and moral and theological questions.

Consequently, I am limiting my approach in this presentation to the enterprise of theology. I

am delimiting theology as our human endeavor to attempt to:

1. Acquire, categorize, analyze and evaluate the data that is acquired through the exercise of

an entirely separate and distinct sixth human sense- our faculty of intuition or spirituality

and then

2. Arrange, assemble and reflect upon this data again through the application to this

differently-derived data of our human intellect – which is our ability to distinguish

between one thing, concept or experience and another.

3. Using both the intuitive and intellectual faculties we can supplement an otherwise strictly

materially-derived mode of ethical reasoning.

4. Arrive at norms of collective conduct that are right from a strictly utilitarian perspective

and from an intuitionist perspective as well.

This approach allows us address the every day problems of life as well as profound cosmic

human questions rationally and intuitively.

110

4.2.2. The Principal Pre-Contact Questions Are

1. Origin:

If our material universe has not simply always been here and it somehow came into existence,

then was this creation event caused by some factor or some phenomenon that was or is not

simply some sub-component material aspect that has simply always been an internal

component of our physical universe? If the universe became materially manifest, what might

this non-material factor, or phenomenon be, that caused our universe to come into material

existence or manifestation?

The traditional Christian answer to this question is that God created everything that is and

holds it in existence. The Jewish, Christian, and Islamic traditions conceive of the Creator

God as personal. These three “religions of the Book” with their common Semitic Middle

Eastern origins present God in the mode of an autocratic desert patriarch or tribal potentate.

However, if in the process of learning more about life in the universe and encountering other

advanced life forms, what will happen to our notion of a paternalistic God who made creation

for us? What if we find that all or parts of the “mulitiverse” the infinite variety of universes

posited by string theory leads us to the conclusion that this perceived coming in and out of

existence is part of a “natural” process?

2. Origination Phenomenon

If our universe – the sum total of all detectable and inferential dark matter and energy – came

into existence by some phenomenon, what might possibly be the nature or qualities of such a

phenomenon?

Does this phenomenon have to be non-material in its nature since, by necessity, it must have

preceded all matter and energy? As we begin to incorporate more of early 20th century

physics based on quantum mechanics even the notion of “materiality” is giving way to

“packets” or quanta energy/matter. The concepts of dark matter/energy that can only be

inferred mathematically are also pushing the notion of what “materiality” is. If we meet an

advanced species, their concept or story related to the existence of the universe may be a

purely natural phenomenon or they may have a radically different set of constructs. However,

if we can push our cultural horizons to have a broader understanding of these questions, we

will have a better sense of our purpose and that of the multiverse.

3. Characteristics of the Originator

It seems then, that this originator phenomenon would not possess any of the qualities of a

noun at all since virtually all concrete nouns (other than abstract concepts or ideas) refer to

material things. This creative phenomenon therefore, possesses certain noun- making qualities

that are intrinsic to material or conceptual objects, such as: shape in terms of finite

boundaries, size – a finite quantity, and duration, a finite temporal existence.

In fact it is possible that such an originator phenomenon would have only the qualities of the

entirely non-transitive verb of being itself. As such it would not have any of the noun making

111

qualities or conditions at all such as: specific location; height, length, width, weight, finitude

or any other measurable features. In turn, this lack of or excess of three dimensions might

make this phenomenon incapable of being perceived by our senses or scientific constructs

which convey qualities or characteristics of objects in the four dimensions of space-time.

Consequently, this originator phenomenon may be beyond our detection because it is not

qualified or conditioned by such qualities. Perhaps, such being is entirely unconditioned,

infinite, and eternal, entirely un- differentiated consciousness itself.

4. Creator and Creation

If the universe came into existence or material manifestation by a non-material phenomenon

that is not some sub-component physical aspect of our material universe, then what might be

the relationship between the creator and creation?

5. Universe As Conscious and Always Existing

Is it possible that the confluence of the sum total of all of the matter / energy that makes up

our entire universe is self conscious in the same way that we are and that it has always

existed.

6. Self Consciousness and the Universe

Whether the universe has always existed or was “caused” to come into material existence at

some specific point, what relationship does my experience of consciousness have with the

universe and to whatever this creator / originator phenomenon there may be?

7. How Does One Know?

How can we know the answers to questions like these? Do really understand our experience

of reality by just using our intellect to focus the material data we can perceive? Is there a sixth

sense a different intuitive faculty that allows to grasp matters in their totality? Is there even a

seventh or spiritual sense or are the spiritual and the intuitive one and the same?

8. Purpose and Meaning

Is there any conceivable specific purpose why such an infinite and eternal, entirely

undifferentiated consciousness might generate an initial, unique locus of differentiation within

its undifferentiated and infinite being? – Was this locus of differentiation the singularity from

which our universe blossomed?

Assuming that the singularity was this locus of differentiation, why did the singularity come

about? What purpose can it have, if any? Can the unfolding of the universe disclose any hints

or ideas as to why it exists and what is the purpose of it unfolding?

If indeed there is a purpose does it also then tell us what all of this means for us an individuals

or nodes of consciousness separated from the undifferentiated consciousness?

In short, if there is no purpose or end is there any reference point by which we can evaluate

and set standards for our conduct to be in harmony with the universe or are we lost in a

meaningless universe?

112

Does this entirely undifferentiated consciousness choose to intervene, or break into, the

natural laws of the universe to enlighten individuals to understand the purpose and direction

of the universe and the norms of our conduct to be in harmony with it?

Is such an illuminating human experience potentially available to everyone through education

or simply by the recognition of what lifestyle practices would lead to such a special

experience?

9. Higher Consciousness as the End Point of Evolution

It is possible that our entire species is undergoing a purposeful evolution in with we will all

have this enlightenment faculty that will allow us to have immediate and direct access to this

special experience. This development would be analogous to the way in which sensory

faculties developed within earth’s life forms that gave them access to the vibratory

phenomena of light and sound. Indeed, there is also the possibility that this development of

our species is being driven by a bonding phenomenon of an infinite and eternal field of

mutual attraction that transcends our universe and extends infinitely out and away in formless

consciousness.

From this perspective we can actually see the universe a type of condensed or contracted

consciousness which is urrounded by a completely unified field of simple unconditioned

being which is conscious of everything.

10. Life after Death?

Would it be possible for me as a self conscious being to survive this individuated material

incarnation in this state of undifferentiated being outside energy /matter?

If this is possible – is there something that I might do to be able to access this state of non-

material being or will it be experienced by all humans eventually regardless of their individual

conduct in this material incarnation?

4.2.3. The Principal Post – Contact Theological Questions Are

1. Do these extra-terrestrials have any sense of theology or are they exclusively

intellectual in the sense that they grant no credence to or role or an intuitive or spiritual

faculty?

Intelligent sentient species are generated by the same infinite and eternal sea of entirely

undifferentiated consciousness. Consequently, extra-terrestrials as conscious beings are

generated as we are from undifferentiated consciousness and are in relationship with it. They

would also be self-conscious since this is a pre-condition for intellect which allows us to

distinguish ourselves from all other things.

Since the relationship between the individuated consciousness and the unitary consciousness

that exists out beyond the physical universe is the very subject matter of theology, it is

113

reasonable to assume that intelligent extra-terrestrials have a theology. In short, their

reflection on their relationship between the self and the source of consciousness constitutes

theological reflection.

Even though they are intelligent beings, it is possible that they might not give credence to

such a source of consciousness and might not have a theology. Like many humans they may a

purely secular or scientific perspective.

This would pose the greatest possible threat not only to our traditional human theological

institutions but, indeed, to our entire human theological enterprise as a whole. This crisis

could pose the danger that our ultimate quest is short circuited by purely secular answers. On

the other hand these secular answers could be seen as freeing us to investigate the deeper

problems of matter and the universe. In this case we would have to develop a field of

endeavor – a ministry – to help humans to adapt these secular answers to the questions of

meaning and purpose in their lives.

2. If they do not have our sense of theology have they developed purely secular or

scientific answers to questions about what lies beyond the space-time boundaries of the

universe? If so what influence does it have on our planet?

Their theology might confirm or contradict some of our various theologies. It might also

trump all of ours. If we adopted their theology it might cause us to adopt their moral, ethical,

and political systems. There are other possibilities. We might add their theology to our

collection. We could insist that our theology is superior. How we could come up with a

comparative ranking of theologies is not at all clear. Such a claim to superiority could be very

dangerous since conflicts over theological systems have been very destructive of human

society and progress.

3. If they do have a theology how will it affect our various theologies on earth?

Will we adopt their theological system and the philosophy and social organization

that derive from it?

Will we just add it to our collection as a new “earth” theology?

If we or some of us judge that our particular theology is superior to theirs, will it lead

to a religious conflict?

What quality or charism could justify such a position on our part?

What quality or charism would cause us to accept their theology as superior?

What if we shared the same desired quality and charism underlying our theologies?

If so, what effect would we have on each other’s theologies?

There will be a wide variety of beliefs and responses to these questions by members of both

civilizations. However, the principles of religious freedom and freedom of conscience will be

paramount. We will have to protect the right of humans and extra-terrestrials to practice their

faith as they see fit. All groups should be free to present their beliefs and to proselytize or

recruit members. Although either group may feel that that its belief system is preferable, they

may not compel anyone to adopt a belief system.

114

The review and study of alternative beliefs, religions, and theologies will be an important

undertaking. We may find that there are certain comparisons that may make one system seem

to be superior to others. However, this can lead to the dreaded human institution of theocracy.

Despite any preference or priority are philosophical and theological might indicate, the

secular state should never establish a religion whether human or extra-terrestrial on our planet

and others.

This brings us to the inevitable issue of what we understand to be the relationship between

biological evolution and spiritual consciousness. Some believe that consciousness is directly

related to one’s level of spirituality which is a function of progressive, teleological, biological

evolution. Within the Catholic Christian Tradition this belief is championed by persons such

as Jesuit paleontologist and theologian Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Meister Eckhart. In the

Hindu Spiritual Tradition this belief is championed by Sri Aurobindo and theosophists such as

Madame Helen Blavatski, Alice Bailey and Annie Besant. The theosophists suggest that

Human “Prophets” or “Adepts” such as: Jesus Christ; Moses; The Buddha; Lao Tsu;

Confucius; Mohammad and or Zoroaster are, indeed, biological mutations who are precursors

of the New Human who is biologically latent within our species and who will evolve into full

fruition over time teleologically as part of the purposeful unfolding of the universe.

If this is a correct assumption, then there is good reason to believe that there are literally tens

of thousand of planets within our galaxy which possess life. These life forms have been

evolving progressively pursuant to the same directional principle that we have. More than

likely, many of these societies are much older than we are given the age of their sections of

the galaxy. Their longer experience of this purpose driven evolution indicates the strong

possibility that they are more consciously evolved than our species.

On the other hand David Wilkerson, a Protestant theologian and physicist believes that

spiritual development of a human being has nothing to do with the state of biological

evolution. (Wilkerson is also a fellow of the British Astronomical Society.) Wilkerson’s

presents his views in his book Alone in the Universe? (1997). Theodore Peters is a professor

of Systematic Theology, at Pacific Lutheran Seminary. In his article “The Implications of the

Discovery of Extra-Terrestrial Life” Peters cites Wilkerson in his article “The Implication of

the Discovery of Extra-Terrestrial Life for Religion” (Royal Academy Philosophical

Transactions 2011). According to Peters, Wilkerson bases his position not on the natural,

progressive development of spiritual consciousness but on Biblical revelation.

“Christianity’s central claim is not based upon the principle of spiritual evolution which will

take us closer and closer to God as our knowledge increases. Christianity recognizes that our

fundamental need is not a super- religion, but a reconciliation which we cannot achieve for

ourselves. At the heart of the Christian faith is the belief in a divinely-initiated redemption, an

action of a gracious God on behalf of a fallen cosmos… This message of salvation coming

directly from God is something we can learn only from revelation it cannot be produced

through spiritual evolution.”

115

Wilkerson believes that revelation is possible even for extra-terrestrials whether they are more

or less biologically than we are.

In my view we must develop a new quantum physics based scientific understand of the truth

which underlies many of the spiritual truths that have been expressed as metaphors and myths.

By sorting through these beliefs we can focus on those that we want to preserve and present to

off world societies. We must also be willing to see the theological systems of extra-terrestrials

as an important part of their culture and include them in our own comparative studies of

religion. However, if their beliefs or principles contravene ours we must make every effort to

preserve ours on our planet and in our conduct on other worlds.

4. For many Christians one of the crucial questions is whether Jesus – in the form of a

human being has visited other planetary civilizations or became incarnate as a true

member of their species?

If the Christ has only manifested on Earth are other intelligent life forms “saved”.

Are humans the only ones saved by the death and resurrection of Jesus?

Does this question – as criticized by certain liberal Christian thinkers – actually show

the misconception of a metaphorical truth for a literal truth?

Since this type of salvation question derives from the explanation of Christian beliefs

in the contexts of Graeco-Roman, Medieval, and other cultures, shouldn’t there be a

priority to re-conceptualize these beliefs in a Post-Contact worldview if non-literalist

Christians are going to save their belief system?

Can we be open to the fact that another species has actually grasped the “truth”?

Conversely, are we willing to present our notion of the “truth” to an intelligent

species that does not have a notion of intuition or “spirituality” if we judge it to be a

better explanation?

When we ask the question of whether Jesus in human form became incarnate and brought

redemption to an off world society or whether his salvation is exclusive to humans because of

his death and resurrection on earth, we show this confusion of metaphorical and literal truth.

This question of salvation has two distinct subsets. The first is the Christian doctrine of

redemption in which Jesus dies to atone for our sins and reconciles us with the Father. The

second question is the actually meaning of the life of Jesus.

We need to deal with these questions in reverse order since one’s position on the second

question will define one’s position on the first.

The majority of the world’s religious population – approximately 66% – is not Christian.

Another 22% do not subscribe to a supernatural or religious dimension of life at all. Of the

one third of the population that is Christian, the person of Jesus is central to their beliefs.

However, the meaning and purpose of Jesus life on earth and his resurrected presence in

everyday life is capable of many different interpretations. Since the largest Christian

denomination is Roman Catholic (1.2 billion of 1.4 billion Chrisitians) with its standardized

116

teaching and belief formulas, we can say that most Christians adhere (at least nominally) to

the centrality of Jesus as Divine Savior. This is also true of other Christian denominations

since it is the central tenet of the faith.

There is a small minority of Catholic and other theologians who see the life and meaning of

Jesus in more metaphorical terms. This position meets stiff resistance since early Christian

teachers and formulators of the religion such as St. Paul specifically rejected non-literal

interpretations offered by the philosophers and mystery religions of the first century.

It is also worth noting that another 1.4 billion humans are followers of Islam. Moslems accept

Jesus as a minor prophet. The prophet Mohammed is the messenger of an utterly and

completely transcendent God. Attaining salvation – entry into heaven in the next life –

depends on adhering to the five central teachings or Pillars of Islam and observing the Islamic

moral code.

In this context it is interesting to note that a small minority of Christians have moved from a

literal understanding of the death and resurrection of Jesus to a symbolic or metaphorical one.

For some in this group, Jesus is the precursor of the fully evolved human. This goes against

the grain of orthodox Christian teaching which views Jesus as truly human and truly divine.

Wilkerson states the traditional consensus Christian view that Jesus as the Incarnate God,

Second Person of the Divine Trinity is God’s gracious act of reconciliation.

The question of God’s revelation to extra-terrestrials is a prime concern for Christians and

Moslems. It off world civilizations have not had the Savior or The Prophet, they can be seen

as tools of the devil and / or ripe missionary fields. A simple review of Christian and Islamic

expansion gives us a preview of their likely perspective on the spiritual welfare and status of

extra-terrestrials.

If we make the reasonable assumption that off world societies that are capable of interstellar

travel are older and therefore more evolved just due to the time interval, it seems highly likely

that they would have had some type of Christ figure or an actual incarnation. This is true if we

assume on the one hand that persons like Jesus represent a more advanced stage of our

evolution. On the other hand the redemption of other worlds could be explained by the

universality of God’s grace and mercy. However, a successful First Contact will require that

Christians and Moslems as well as other faith traditions deal with these possibilities now.

Much of the current language and concepts of present day Christianity are the result of the

synthesis and tumult of Roman Empire of the west combining with the great migratory

invasions of tribes from Eastern Europe and Central Asia. This synthesis is known as the

Middle Ages. In fact the pre-eminence of punishment and hell fire, the use of Aristotelian

logic, and the significance of numbers shows the great influence of Islam on European

Christianity in this medieval formulation.

Christians face a similar challenge in dealing with Asian religions and cultures and those of

indigenous people. The modern social justice ethic has led to a strong critique of missionary

117

activity as part of cultural and economic imperialism. Accommodating other cultures is more

of a challenge for those Christians whose only rule of faith is the literal interpretation of the

Bible. These smaller free churches do not have a hierarchical structure and they can be anti-

intellectual.

Christianity has now been through a strong demythologizing phase over the last fifty years.

This has led to a more metaphorical interpretation among some academic Christian elites.

More importantly, though, it has opened a key space to see belief formulations as pale

attempts to convey a deeper reality beyond the physical.

The Second Vatican Council (1961-1965) changed much of the medieval language and

practice of Catholicism to that of the mid-20th century. Clearly a Post Contact earth will

require similar adjustments and transformations. Protestant and Orthodox churches also made

similar, if less dramatic, changes. Turkey became a modern successful secular state in an

Islamic religious context.

The post-colonial encounter with Hinduism, Buddhism and contemporary neuroscience has

already lead to changes in the notions of sin and guilt. There has been a shift away, in

Christianity, from individual sin to the social structure of sin as oppression and exploitation.

1. Can we be open to the fact that another species has actually grasped the truth? Conversely,

are we willing to present our notion of the truth to an intelligent species that does not have a

notion of intuition or spirituality if we judge it to be a better explanation?

2. Doesn’t the increased likelihood of contact require us to work on a clearer understanding of

intuition and spirituality as distinctive beneficial human characteristics to be placed at the

service of other advanced intelligent life forms?

We must also prepare to present off world civilizations our faculty of intuition and use it to

develop our belief systems in the Post Contact world. In fact this has been a core theme in

Star Trek and other space sagas. The uniqueness of our species with a soul and a conscience

has been our trump card in these mythic encounters with more advanced and more power

beings.

If indeed, this turn out to be the case we should prepare and support humans with these

advanced gifts as our ambassadors. These would include men and women from Sufi,

Christian, Hindu, Jewish and other mystical adepts.

In fact, we should embark on a major effort to develop and use this sixth intuitive sense as

common medium of communication between ourselves and extra-terrestrials.

7. Is it possible for extra-terrestrial life forms to be “Angels” or “Demons” in the sense

that they are basically good or bad? Are they like us in terms of being good with moral

failings? Given the potential for vast numbers of advanced life forms, is it possible that

their cultures would cover a spectrum of values between malevolence and benevolence?

118

There can be a dialectical mindset in which we are tempted to see extra- terrestrial societies as

angelic or demonic. To the extent that they a rational beings, more than likely, they are like us

in terms of behaving well and behaving badly at times. Our best approach is to give these

societies the benefit of the doubt and to use the tool of cultural relativism to understand these

cultures in their own terms as opposed to ours.

The primary challenge to theology has to do with the fact that it is anthropocentric. It is

centered on the importance of humans to God and the dynamic of divine and human

interaction.

8. What aspect of our theological belief system will be most affected by encounter with

extra-terrestrials?

THIS is the prospect that I discussed in my article published in the Special Vatican UFO Issue

of OPEN MINDS Magazine entitled: “Catholic Dogma Faces E.T. “p. 77.

In this article, I presented several themes that have already been discussed in this monograph.

The key challenge for the Judaeo Chrisitian tradition is the challenge to the belief that the

creation was made for our species and that we have a unique central place in it. In fact,

Christians see the history of the solar system as an unfolding of “salvation history”. In this

context, humans renounce their centrality in the cosmos through disobedience and suffer the

consequences of this alienation: death, murder, war, starvation, and the whole panoply of

evils. Humanity is reconciled to God through the death and resurrection of God’s Word, Jesus

who is both truly human and divine.

Some have, indeed, already embarked upon the intellectual process of attempting to try to

transform ETs into the mythological pagan gods or into the position of the angelic beings in

the classical Catholic theology.

I believe, however, that all of these entirely-understandable and good-faith human efforts to

try to shoehorn these extra-terrestrials into the shoes of these mythological beings are destined

to achieve no happier an outcome than that which was experienced by each of the step sisters

of Cinderella in their vain effort to force their undeserving foot into the magical glass slipper.

We, must, I believe, instead, come to the true meaning of the phenomenon of our own human

spirituality and its mysterious, intimate relationship to the realm of consciousness (the Great

Ontological Mystery) in the broader context of quantum physics. This task is all the more

urgent as the probability of First Contact increases. If we are not to be relegated to an inferior

status by a more advanced off world civilization.

I am confident that extra-terrestrials, too, will have discovered the secret of that most

important faculty upon which the ultimate success or failure of our common mission together

will be our mutually shared faculty of intuition, our shared spiritual faculty that is rooted in

what we hope is our shared capacity to experience, in common the unity of all being.

119

If I am correct in this assumption that this Extra-Terrestrial Species has also learned this

important “Secret”, then the pathway to our true “Partnership” with them will be clear. It will

lie along the pathway which resides within each one us, in both of our species. For it is truly

the individual access which each one of us has to this intimate experience of unity, as a

member of our human species and as a member of an extra-terrestrial species whom we are in

the process of encountering, that constitutes the true gateway to the stars. Let us hope and,

yes, let us pray that this pathway will lead our human family home and that along this

pathway home we will encounter our extra-terrestrial partners on our way back to our

common home.

9. If other advanced life forms are more advanced in their notion of intuition and

spirituality, won’t that reduce our belief systems to mere primitive attempts to deal with

these questions?

IF this is true, it is possible that we may still possess a theologically important quality

according to even an entirely new, more-expanded, theology.

A. If so, what precisely is this unique or special quality?

B. How important, exactly is this quality to us even though it may be something we share with

a non-human species?

C. What might this new expanded theology be?

4.3. Philosophical Implications

4.3.1. The Nature of Philosophical Questions in General

Philosophical questions are directed to our human family’s most profound and fundamental

questions about the nature of our universe, our place in it, and why we exist at all.

1. How did this universe in which we find ourselves actually get here? Has it simply always

been here? Did it come into existence at one specific point in time in the past just as each

one of us did?

2. Will our universe and all of the wonderful things that we have achieved as a species simply

disappear one day in our future just as it began in one single moment or might it all simply

dissipate out into Infinity?

In short, such philosophical questions are directed toward our human family’s understanding

of the principles pursuant to which events are taking place and what the importance might be

(if any) of our human family within these unfolding events.

As we also noted in our 2010 opening discussion of this topic, the enterprise of philosophy is

our human family’s attempt to:

120

1. Acquire, categorize, analyze and evaluate the sensory data that is acquired by us Human

Beings through the exercise of our five, physical human senses as well as our experience

of intuition; then to

2. Arrange ideas, assemble thoughts and reflect upon this experience through the application

of our human intellect

3. Construct a sound and effective mode of ethical reasoning which we can

4. Apply to guide our human conduct both individual and collective, to address the individual

problems of life and

5. To try to answer the cosmic, profound, questions of life so that we as thinking, logical,

rational, and logical beings can

6. Rationally determine how best to comport our human conduct – both individual and

collective – in a manner that is right and to refrain from engaging in human conduct that is

wrong.

4.3.2. The Principal Pre- Contact Philosophical Questions and Pillars of Belief

1. The Cosmological Question:

WHEN and how did this entire material universe and all things that we see all around us

come to be? In short, why is it that there is something rather than nothing? Did all of these

material things come into existence at one single moment in time, in the past or is it

possible that all of this has simply always existed? What difference -if any – does the

answer to this question make?

2. The Teleological or Purpose Question:

However our material Universe came into physical being, is our universe physically

unfolding, or physically moving in some particular direction toward some specific,

ascertainable end or objective?

In short, is there any pre-ordained or pre-programmed purpose or end game toward which

our universe seems to be heading; are the consequences of this purpose operating in the

universe as natural laws?

3. The Ethical or Meaning / Purpose Question:

If there is such a specific end or objective toward which the universe is steadily and

progressively unfolding does that end or objective implicitly provide some kind of relative

meaning or purpose for the existence of the universe?

4. The Ontological or Being / Consciousness Question:

How did consciousness come into existence within this entire apparently strictly material

universe? More specifically, how did this consciousness which I experience myself come

into existence? What is the nature of this consciousness which distinguishes it from the rest

of the seemingly non-conscious or strictly material universe?

5. The Epistemological or Nature of Truth Question:

What are the means by which we, as human beings can possibly ascertain the knowledge

to answer these cosmic questions.

121

6. The Free Will Question:

Do animals or insects think or do they just do whatever comes naturally to them by pure

instinct alone by dint of some entirely unreflective DNA programming? In other words, are

animals and insects somehow physically programmed, simply mechanically, by nature to

act in all of the ways in which they act?

If so, are we human beings mere animals in this way as well? That is, am I and are you to

some degree simply biologically programmed by nature to act merely mechanically as all

other animals do?

On the other hand are we, to some degree -if any- capable of choosing to consciously

diverge from any such physical programming that we have received from nature?

7. Comparative Social Ethics:

If we are capable of freely choosing what conduct we will – or will not – engage in, then

what norms, standards, criteria or objective principles are we to choose to guide our

conduct? Pursuant to what criteria are we, in turn, to ascertain or discern these standards?

8. The Philosophical Endeavor:

Once we identify an effective and persuasive mode of ethical reasoning, the philosophical

endeavor is our effort to apply it to guide our individual lives on a daily basis.

9. Political Philosophy:

We engage in political philosophy when we apply this same specific mode of ethical

reasoning to guide our collective human decision making in areas which affect entire

communities regarding individual and group choices that confront us in the course of our

daily community living.

10. Theology vs. Philosophy:

When we attempt to answer these philosophical questions with regard to activities outside

of the physical parameters of our universe we are in the realm of theology.

4.3.3. The Principal Post – Contact Philosophical Questions

1. Since the discovery by our human family of the existence of technologically advanced

intelligent life forms what are the philosophical implications, in general, of this

transformational discovery? Specifically, what are the philosophical implications of

our discovery that we as a species are not necessarily at the apex of evolution in the

universe?

The discovery of advanced extra-terrestrial life forms dislocates humanity from the center

of the universe. It is analogous to Galileo’s discovery that the earth and other planets orbit

the sun.

122

2. Can we as a species accommodate this change philosophically the same way we

eventually adjusted to the notion that the earth and planets orbit the sun? Is there a

way to retain our assumed “privileged” states as a species?

While it is possible that extra-terrestrial species may be more advanced than we are in

certain ways, there is the possibility that our faculties of intuition and spirituality would

help us keep our preferred status. For examples, aliens who focused on reason at the

expense of emotion or aesthetic values wouldn’t meet our criteria as advanced in some

ways. Also, our encounter with other intelligent life forms may lead us to place less value

on intelligence as the hallmark of evolution if aliens have a low social IQ by our standards.

3. If the members of this newly discovered extra-terrestrial, intelligent species are more

biologically evolved than we are what effect has that had on them relative to us? Do

they still retain the basic survival, predatory, and dominance drives that we do or

have they gone beyond them in some way?

If they have evolved in a way in which they can transcend basic survival drives for

violence and domination, we may find ourselves having to deal with a greatly reduced

sense of our place in the universe. This will be particularly true if it appears that their

evolution is being directed to an end point of perfection in a purpose driven teleological

fashion. This situation of inferiority may be compounded by encounters with more than

one extra-terrestrial group with a higher state of emotional integration.

4. Even if other intelligent life forms are more evolved, is there something about our

intuition that is purpose driven (teleogical) which still gives us a unique superior

place in the universe? In other words does intuition replace intelligence as the key

indicator of evolutionary progress?

The short answer is yes. If we perceive and believe theologically in the power of grace as a

divine free gift that has been bestowed on our species, we can see our status in a different

light. Once again the primacy of intuition and spirituality may differentiate us from other

advanced species we may encounter. Others who take the opposite theological tack that we

can consciously increase our state of intuitive and spiritual function will focus more on the

possibility of human growth and achievement. In either case our status would not be

threatened by the discovery of other more advanced life forms since their participation in

consciousness and evolution is analogous to ours. As a more evolved species they would

be further along the development cycle but would share a common development dynamic

with us.

5. If the biological experience of the unitive Intuition of being is the next phase of

human evolution, will the extra-terrestrial species we encounter already have evolved

to this state? What are the implications if such beings do not show a higher state of

consciousness?

Craine Brinton marked the end of his 30 year tenure as Chair of the Department of

Intellectual History at Harvard University with a talk in May of 1968. His topic was the

single most important idea that he had encountered in his 50 year career as a scholar.

123

In brief, Professor Brinton said that just as the development of intellect caused our species

Homo sapiens sapiens to diverge from Homo erectus, the evolution of the faculty of

intuition would be the next transformation of our lineage.

“And it is by biologically experiencing this unitive experience that one comes to truly

know that everything is one…including each of us…with all that exists. And by means of

this direct, biological experience (like seeing, hearing or smelling), we can each

experientially come to know what specific form of human conduct – both individual and

collective is either harmonious with or disharmonious to the natural order of being.”

It may be that our unique contribution to other intelligent life forms may be our ability to

achieve higher states of consciousness – such as the biological experience of the unitive

intuition of being – as individuals now and perhaps as a universal trait in the future. In fact,

this is a common philosophical theme in the various forms of the Star Trek sagas. The

quest for such a faculty on a personal level is personified in the character of Data, an

android with amazing intellectual and physical capabilities who can conceive of this

faculty but does not experience it. This faculty allows us to experience the physical

phenomenon of the Unified Field which physically bonds together ever single, ultimately

non-divisible unit of mater in the entire universe into one integrated and harmonious

whole.

Through this unitive experience each of us will come to know what conduct is either

individually and collectively harmonious or disharmonious with natural order of being.

6. How would our encounter with an extra-terrestrial civilization change the context

and dynamic of our internal political, economic, and social disputes? Shouldn’t we be

recasting our relationships and institutions in preparation for this encounter?

“The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled

by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the

momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the

inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some

other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another,

how fervent their hatreds.” -Carl Sagan, astronomer and writer (1934-1996)

It is now clear that we, as a species, ought to be directing our immediate collective human

attention to the resolving these disputes which now appear to be petty in the context of a

broader galactic perspective. This will be essential if we as a species hope to convey to the

leadership of an extra-terrestrial civilization that we intend to retain certain absolutely

fundamental principles and values.

7. How will we explain to them our less than “stellar” qualities as a species without

creating distrust and defining ourselves as inferior primitives?

Our only real hope in this type of encounter is to present our strengths as well particularly

our sense of compassion. However, we need to strengthen and improve our species

through compassion and affection for all humans.

124

So, we should begin now.

8. Do they have philosophical questions and answers to such questions as to the physical

source and origin of the universe and its organizing phenomenon? Do these

philosophical answers lead to some type of ethical system? Would they try to impose

this system of values and behavior on us?

Professor Carl Johan Calleman of the University of Washington in The Purposeful

Universe: How Quantum Theory and Mayan Cosmology Explains the Origin and

Evolution of Life (2009) asserts that scientists are, just now, beginning to discover

evidence that there may well exist a physical vertical axis at the very center of our

universe. This may be the so-called yaxin or Tree of Life to which the ancient Mayan

culture attributed a personality whom they called Hunab-Ku.

Three perpendicular axes emerge from this physical vertical axis. The physical vibrations

which these axes send out create the three physical dimensions of length, breadth and

depth in the universe.

Such a fascinating idea may or may not be turn out to be true. However if it is true and an

extra-terrestrial civilization already has the same or a similar notion, they may expect or

even require that all intelligent beings adhere to these norms individually and collectively

in order to harmonize with this source.

This change would give the Sixth or Radical Monist worldview priority among all seven

human worldviews. In fact this discovery might eliminate the other human world views or

drive them underground.

9. If the extra-terrestrial civilization we encounter does not have such an absolute

source for its ethical system, what might their views be – if any?

The answer to this question is very important because it will determine whether:

A. Can we trust them to keep their promises?

B. Do they lie?

C. Do they kill other sentient beings?

D. Do they steal property, resources, or territory?

E. Do they engage in conduct all humans consider unethical?

There are ways in which we can determine the underlying value system or principles and

the way in which norms or standards are embodied in the ethical system. This is a complex

task. It can be done by looking for an internally self- consistent set of answers to four key

questions which are the underpinnings of any philosophical system. You may recognize

them since we have already discussed them.

125

A. The cosmological question – Why is there anything?

B. The teleological question – Is there a guiding purpose?

C. The ontological question – Why are we here?

D. The ethical question – What is right and wrong?

It is possible that extra-terrestrials we may encounter will not have definitive and verified

answers to these questions. If that is the case they may also have developed alternative

answers to each question. This would mean that they had also arrived at the same octave

alternative answer giving them an octave of extra- terrestrial worldviews. We would then

have a basis to relate to them.

10. What is the likelihood that such a species created homo sapiens or directed our

evolution?

This provocative thesis which is outside the scientific mainstream is advocated by Zecharia

Sitchen in his books Genesis Revisited and the Earth Chronicles. In this scenario, human

have mythologized our creators into gods. Similar speculations are put forth by Erich von

Daniken’s book In Search of Ancient Astronauts.

While this appears to be a theological question, it is not since we are speaking of creation

in a material and mechanical sense within the bounds of space-time. Even if humans are

the result of some type of technical process, it only moves the theological question to the

species responsible for our development. In other words, “Who created them?”

4.4. Public Policy Implications

4.4.1. The Principal PRE-Contact “Public Policy” Questions Are

1. Policy Making Process

What is the best “process” for making decisions which affect the community – given the fact

that there exist seven entirely different “Worldviews” which shape and mold personal and

group perceptions of issues, possible solutions, and evaluation criteria?

2. Personal Independence

What degree of independence and personal freedom should each person retain with regard to

her or his personal conduct and social conduct?

3. Personal Rights Safeguards

What agreed-upon community institutional safeguards ought to be established by the

community to safeguard this appropriate degree of personal independence and freedom?

4. Norms and Sanctions

126

What agreed-upon community institutional rules and structures ought are necessary to enforce

community adopted norms and rules?

5. Persuasion and Social Pressure

Over and above the formal laws that must be obeyed what measures should the individual be

encouraged to obey through social pressure and persuasion. What are the most effective

ethical ways to improve acceptance of these regulations?

6. Social Safety Net

What provision should be made for the basic necessities for survival and a life of dignity for

everyone over and above the purely private personal efforts on the part of each such

individual to provide for her or his own such personal needs and for the needs of her or his

own immediate family members?

7. Personal Physical Security

What provision should the community make for personal physical security for its members

against internal and external threats?

8. Personal Protection and Development Services

In addition to providing for physical protection what other services or protections should the

community afford its members? In addition to education, health care, sanitation, civil

infrastructure, housing, food, what other safeguards and programs should the community offer

its members?

9. Global Policy Coordination

What steps should the world community undertake to coordinate public policy in these areas?

Economics

Agriculture

Transportation

Water

Sanitation & Environmental Protection

Defense

Education & Self-Advancement

Medical Care; and

Recreation.

10. Planetary Governance

Should all of the individual communities on our planet be progressively subsumed into one

global collective community, as communication and transportation technologies become

advanced to the state of making this possible? Or are there specific practical advantages or

important values to be realized by having less massive communities maintained…or even

initiated such as “Bio-Regional” Communities.

127

4.4.2. The Principal Post – Contact Public Policy Questions Are

1. In the case that we should discover an extra-terrestrial civilization should we make

our presence known and the way in which we came across them?

This would not be a good idea until we have found out what level of intelligence they may

have and their possible reaction to us.

If we have picked up their radio or some other electronic emission from this Extra- Terrestrial

Species, then our presence may still remain a total secret from them. If this is the case, we

should keep it this way until we have undertaken a process by means of which our entire

human family can participate in the decision as to whether (or when) we should decide to

“communicate” with this extra-terrestrial species.

I, of course, would vote that we do contact them. However, others may disagree – even

violently – with this position. Since this issue is of such an absolutely extraordinarily

important nature, we should undertake every possible step to see to it that every Human Being

is provided an opportunity to vote on this permanent species altering decision.

If, on the other hand the specific means by which we have “discovered” the existence of this

extra-terrestrial species has compromised the secrecy of our existence. Then we should await

some kind of outreach from them while we undertake the above recommended decision-

making process as to whether or when we undertake to contact this new intelligent species.

Again, I would, of course, recommend that we reach out to them and communicate our

peaceful intentions taking the initiative to establish a positive relationship between our two

civilizations.

Other human beings may, of course, view such a course of action to be a demonstration of

weakness, opting, instead, to await the initiation of substantive contact from them. This would

allow us to evaluate the import and frequency of their communication to us, before we

commit ourselves to any specific disposition toward them.

This, of course, would be the very first worldview clash between adherents to different human

worldviews as to the policy that our human family should adopt toward the extra-terrestrials.

In order to avoid these clashes, we recommend that we undertake to make these policy

decisions now instead of waiting to make them under the duress of first contact.

2. Who should be informed of this discovery? Who should know that we have

established contact?

Top military officials only?

Key executive branch officials?

Top level elected domestic officials?

International allies?

Leaders of all nations?

Our view is that all of the above groups should be notified and briefed as soon as possible.

128

1. Shouldn’t we avoid making any contact with extra-terrestrials until we have

addressed the philosophical and theological questions that will be posed by this

encounter?

To withhold this information from the public is something that leaders of societies all around

the world believe is not only their prerogative but also their obligation to protect the people

from themselves

2. Should public officials disclose the discovery of an advanced extra-terrestrial society?

This is of course the most sensitive of all public policy questions dealing with first contact. In

fact many Americans believe that their government is withholding just such information and

has been doing so for many decades. This case has been made forcefully by Dr. Richard

Dolan in his two volume work: UFOs and the National Security State.

This decision against transparency appears to be inevitable due to the structure of

administrative agencies which exercise their power through dispensing and withholding

information.

Despite this probability, our Open Skies Ministry should actively support the! establishment

of United States Government Policy and an United NATIONS policy mandating transparency

to governments and the worldwide community.

3. Should we inform the general population?

This is a complex issue. Please see the following answers.

4. Should we withhold all information about first contact until we have evaluated

whatever military threat might be posed?

While such a Policy might, at first impression, seem to be logical, prudent and even

responsible, upon closer analysis, it will be revealed to be nothing more than a habit- response

fostered by a national security state mentality. Such a policy institutionalizes a mindset that is

explicitly contradictory to the very mindset that is uniformly espoused by virtually every

spiritual, ethical teaching known to our species.

Therefore, our open minds ministry should, I propose, actively espouse the establishment of a

United States Government and United Nations public policy affirmatively mandating the

public disclosure of any information establishing the existence of life on any other planet in

our universe within 24 hours of the confirmation of the credibility of this information.

5. What is the best way for us to reveal first contact to the public at large in order to

generate the best possible response?

This “Public Policy” Decision is, of course, the subject of intense discussion within The UFO

Community.

Some long-time, and trusted, members of our International UFO Congress Community such

as Randolph Koppang believe that they have come across very-persuasiveevidence that such a

public policy decision has already been made by the United States government. Some believe

129

that the government even before the Roswell crash in 1947 has been engaged in a program of

inoculating our society and culture by introducing data that they thin will help the public

overcome the shock of first contact. This is supposed to consist of phased revelation after

phased revelation through timed releases of factual information through good faith

investigators who believed that they were extracting this information from an unwilling

government

Others in our community are equally convinced that that a firm decision has been made by

our government to take every step that might be necessary (including the use of physical

violence) to keep this secret concealed from the public for as long as they possibly can. And

there is certainly evidence to support this thesis as well such as the public testimony of many

witnesses surrounding The Roswell Crash Investigation who assert that they were directly

threatened with physical violence if they did not remain silent about what they had seen

surrounding the removal of debris and bodies from the crashed saucer site on the Braswell

Ranch.

I propose that our Open Minds Ministry undertake to establish the public policy – both on the

part of our United States Government and on the part of the United Nations – that any and all

information about the existence of any and every potential Extra- Terrestrial form of

Intelligent Life be transmitted to public through official classes taught in every public school

in the world.

I also propose that we undertake to establish the policy on the part of every faith based

community to instruct all of their members as to the details that we come to know about any

extra-terrestrial species so as to have these teachings undertaken in a way to build an ever

growing community who will approach our relationship with these extra- terrestrials from the

perspective of “the better angels of our nature” rather than out of fear and mistrust.

6. Should we first establish some form of covert surveillance of this E.T. civilization to

assure ourselves that they are peaceful before we reveal its existence?

We should undertake every ethical method at our disposal to find out everything that we

possibly can about these extra-terrestrials. We should be overt, not covert.

7. Should we try to contact these extra-terrestrials?

8. Would it be ethical to attempt to use our discovery and the knowledge gained from it

to try to secure some advantage over other nations?

Absolutely not. This is the most important opportunity since the beginning of the nation state

system under the treaty of Westphalia in 1648 to start setting aside the dysfunctional aspects

of this intrinsically dangerous human institution.

9. Given the profound negative implication of public policy questions #7 and #8 above,

shouldn’t we consider establishing a new global joint institution to develop these

important policy positions in the common interest of people everywhere?

130

YES, and the make up of such an Institution must be very carefully analyzed and discussed so

as to receive a virtual consensus on its make-up. This should be done as soon as possible.

Should we conduct ourselves toward these extra-terrestrials in basically the same self

interested manner we deal with other human nation states? NO. This is precisely why such

activities should be undertaken by non governmental civilian organization. Ideally this

organization would be grounded in and motivated by genuinely spiritual values and

aspirations such as the Open Skies Ministry.

Should we trust or distrust extra-terrestrials more or less than we trust or distrust other

humans? We should handle these relations from the very highest principles. First Contact can

give our species a chance to start over again in the way we frame and conduct our

communications and establish relationships.

10. If the E.T. civilization is substantially more advanced than we are technologically,

what steps should we take to protect ourselves from the destructive effects that were

suffered by human societies when they encountered others with more advanced

technology?

This is a very challenging public policy issue. Our own history gives us reason for great pause

here on the threshold of encountering what may be an extra-terrestrial culture that is much

more advanced. This threatens to cause our entire distinctly human to be almost immediate

subsume by such an advanced culture which may be right here in our own galaxy.

Should we avoid making any contact with extra-terrestrials until we have addressed the

philosophical and theological questions that will be posed by this encounter? To withhold this

information from the public is something that leaders of societies all around the world believe

is not only their prerogative but also their obligation to protect the people from themselves.

Our view is that the public should be informed.

This challenge gives us all the more urgency for us to update and affirm our own culture as a

species to prepare us for the effects the First Encounter will have on our music, art, religion,

science, and technology. Our social norms will also be influenced regarding the structure of

ethical and political systems and interpersonal relationships including sexual mores.

Professor Samuel P. Huntington’s landmark work The Clash of Civilizations and the

Remaking of the World Order strongly advises any culture that finds itself on the brink of

encountering a more powerful culture should take every step to identify and strengthen its

most fundamental values, beliefs, spiritual practices, and other fundamental aspects of its own

culture.

Professor Huntington’s remarks were made in the context of the rising economic and political

strength of China and its potential influence on western culture. However, this advice is a

useful warning regarding the unintended consequences of First Contact.

131

Consequently, the Open Skies Ministry should encourage our human family to ascertain what

it is that beliefs and values we want to retain in the face of an encounter with a more

technologically inter-stellar advanced civilization. It is important to remember that we are not

supporting or advocating xenophobia – a fear and rejection of other cultures. By the same

token we should not adopt beliefs and values that are diametrically opposed to our own.

We may well be at that point in our history in which we have the opportunity and the

challenge affirm positive beliefs and values and to shed and discard others as we step out

together into the stars.

5. Sources The New Paradigm Institute: http://NewParadigmInstitute.org

See also:

Daniel P. Sheehan official website: http://DanielPSheehan.com

Youtube-channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnrShHXCboC6fNzFFTOCCog/playlists

Facebook-page: https://www.facebook.com/danielpetersheehan

Romero Institute: http://www.RomeroInstitute.org

Open Skies Ministry: http://openskiesministry.org