dan preece dpm pgy-2. authors: blitz n, lee t, williams k, barkan h, didimenico l. journal of foot...

10
Journal Article Presentation: Early Weight Bearing After Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis Dan Preece DPM PGY-2

Upload: claude-mason

Post on 17-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

Journal Article Presentation:

Early Weight Bearing After Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis

Dan Preece DPM PGY-2

Page 2: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.

Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010.

Early Weight Bearing After Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis: A Multicenter Review of 80 Cases.

Page 3: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

Study Type: Retrospective, multicenter review of 80 patients. (80 feet in 76 pts)

Study Question: Effects of early weightbearing on fusion rates following arthrodesis of 1st met-cuneiform joint.

Early Weight Bearing After Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis

Page 4: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

Intro: Early studies used fixation of cat gut or a single screw which showed high levels of nonunions. 6 weeks of NWB became standard of care. However non of these studies were based on today’s fixation techniques.

Limited data has shown that early weight bearing yields very low percentages of non unions with current screw fixation techniques.

Page 5: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

◦ 76 patients, 80 feet from 2002-2007.

◦ Surgeries performed by two surgeons (Blitz, DiDemenico).

◦ Only surgeries that involved only the first ray were included (muscle-tendon balancing, austin, akin…).

◦ Pre and Post-Op radiographic angles taken (IM, Hallux Valgus angle, lateral metatarsal angle)

◦ Outcomes measured were: trabeculation across osteotomy, pain at surgical site on clinical exam.

Methods:

Page 6: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

◦ Fixation: Majority solid screws x 3, 11 pts only received 2

screws, 1 pt received 4.

Two screws in sagital plane perpendicular to osteotomy and lagged.

Third screw medial to lateral across 1-2nd met bases or into intermediate phalanx and not lagged.

Methods continued:

Page 7: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

◦ NWB in Jones dressing/splint or Cam walker x 2-3 weeks.

◦ After 1st post-op visit all placed in CAM walker, progression to full WB as tolerated.

◦ All pts were fully WB by 6 week visit.

Post-Op Protocol:

Page 8: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

Pre-Op HVA: 21 Post-Op HVA: 9

Pre-Op IMA: 13 Post-Op IMA: 6.6

Pre-Op LMA: 21.45 Post-Op LMA: 25.8

Days to partial WB: 15 Days to radiographic union: 44.5 Union Percentage: 100%

** all P values were .001 or smaller

Measures:

Page 9: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

Joint preparation approach made no difference. Curretage vs planar resection with sagittal saw. Presence or absence of subchondral plate.

2 vs 3 screw fixation had same outcomes.

Autogenous bone graft was used in all cases, either trephine or from exostectomy. No difference.

Obesity and smoking made no difference.

Discussion:

Page 10: Dan Preece DPM PGY-2.  Authors: Blitz N, Lee T, Williams K, Barkan H, DiDimenico L.  Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jul/Aug 2010

Data gathering stopped at time of clinical/radiographic fusion. This does not rule out the possibility of a non-union during the course of healing/rehab.

Unclear when weightbearing truly began between the 2nd and 6th week marks. Was advanced as tolerated. Possible that WB only began at week 5 and 6.

Criticisms: