6

Hold No.1:

Tank top & hoppers were slightly rusted with scales at some locals.

7

Hold No.1:

Tank top & hoppers were slightly rusted with scales at some locals.

Some positions of tank top were being slightly moisture.

8

Hold No.1:

Generally viewing to Tank top

Generally viewing to Ceiling

9

Hold No.2:

Generally viewing to Tank top

Generally viewing to hold

10

Hold No.2:

Tank top & hoppers were slightly rusted with scales at some locals.

11

Hold No.2:

Tank top & man holes were slightly rusted with scales at some locals

12

Hold No.3:

Generally viewing to Tank top

13

Hold No.3:

Tank top & man-holes were slightly rusted with scales at some locals.

14

Hold No.3:

Tank top was slightly rusted with scales at some locals

15

Hold No.4:

Generally viewing to Tank top

Generally viewing to Hold

16

Hold No.4:

Tank top & man-holes were slightly rusted with scales at some locals.

17

Hold No.4:

Tank top was slightly rusted at some locals

18

Taken the sweeping cargo samples at Ship’s holds (on the tank top)

Sample of Hold No.1

Sample of Hold No.2

19

Sample of Hold No.3

Sample of Hold No.4

20

Taken the sweeping cargo samples at holds (on the tank top)

22

The alleged cargo were stored in Hai Phong Port’s Warehouse

23

The alleged cargo were stored in Hai Phong Port’s Warehouse

24

Taken and opened randomly at the entire of positions of sweeping cargo of 203.70 mts to determine on

the extent of damage and taking samples

25

Taken and opened randomly at the entire of positions of sweeping cargo of 203.70 mts to determine on

the extent of damage and taking samples

26

Mixed all of goods before sampling

27

Sampled

28

Samples

29

Condition of the alleged damaged sweeping cargo at port warehouse

31

III. THE ADJUSTED ON LOSS/DAMAGE & COMPENSATION

This is based on Ship-owner, The Cargo Insurance & "Buyer/ Receiver” have considered on the

settlement of this case.

The seller is not responsible for this matter.

IV. OPINION

Basing on the official results of our inspection, and refer to the relative document, we are of the

opinion that the damages to the above mentioned cargo happened in the ship’s holds during the

discharge at Hai Phong port, Vietnam due to the following causes:

• The sweep ing cargoes were s l ight ly s ta ined at due to Ho ld s s l i gh t ru s t ed .

• Dunnage materials were not applied for segregation of the cargo from ship’s holds

construction.

FOR AGRICULTURE - INDUSTRY - MARINE INSPECTION GROUP

Dr. Capt. Nguyen Te Nhan / General Director