daftar pustaka - eprints.ums.ac.ideprints.ums.ac.id/11271/10/daft.pustaka.lamp..pdfjurnal ekonomi,...

15
DAFTAR PUSTAKA Acker, Joan. 1990. Hierarchies Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organiation. Gender and Society. 4 (2) : 139-157. Aranya, et. al. 1981. An Examination of Professional Commitment in Public Accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society. 6 (4): 271-280. Arens, Alvin A. dan James K. Loebbecke. 1996. Auditing, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Dermantoto, Argyo. 2004. Perempuan dan Pasar Kerja, Analisis Mengenai Keterlibatan Perempuan dalam Pasar Kerja. Dilema. 17 (2): 66-79. Djarwanto, Ps. 2001. Statistik Nonparametrik Edisi 3. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Dwiatmadja, C. dan Y.M. Kusumaningrum. 2000. Potret Perempuan Pekerja di Masa krisis Ekonomi. Telaah Bisnis. 1 (2): 123-132. Gitosudarmo, Indriyo dan I Nyoman Sudit. 2000. Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Giyartiningrum, Rr. Eko. 2003. Perbedaan Gaya Kepemimpinan dalam Perspektif Gender. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi. 1 (2): 103-113. Glover, David and Cora Caplan. 2000. Genders. London: Routledge. Goh, Swee C. 1991. Sex Differences in Perceptions of Interpersonal Style, Career Emphasis, Supervisory Mentoring Behavior, and Job Satisfaction. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 24 (11/12): 701-710. Handoko, T. Hani. 1995. Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE. http://www.akuntanpublik.org . IAI-KAP. 2001. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik Per 1 Januari 2001. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Ikhsan, Arfan dan Muh. Ishak. 2005. Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Indriantoro, Nur dan Bambang Supomo. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Jusup, Al. Haryono. 2001. Auditing. Yogyakarta: Bagian Penerbitan STIE YKPN.

Upload: hadan

Post on 03-Aug-2019

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Acker, Joan. 1990. Hierarchies Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organiation. Gender and Society. 4 (2) : 139-157.

Aranya, et. al. 1981. An Examination of Professional Commitment in Public Accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society. 6 (4): 271-280.

Arens, Alvin A. dan James K. Loebbecke. 1996. Auditing, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Dermantoto, Argyo. 2004. Perempuan dan Pasar Kerja, Analisis Mengenai Keterlibatan Perempuan dalam Pasar Kerja. Dilema. 17 (2): 66-79.

Djarwanto, Ps. 2001. Statistik Nonparametrik Edisi 3. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Dwiatmadja, C. dan Y.M. Kusumaningrum. 2000. Potret Perempuan Pekerja di Masa krisis Ekonomi. Telaah Bisnis. 1 (2): 123-132.

Gitosudarmo, Indriyo dan I Nyoman Sudit. 2000. Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Giyartiningrum, Rr. Eko. 2003. Perbedaan Gaya Kepemimpinan dalam Perspektif Gender. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi. 1 (2): 103-113.

Glover, David and Cora Caplan. 2000. Genders. London: Routledge.

Goh, Swee C. 1991. Sex Differences in Perceptions of Interpersonal Style, Career Emphasis, Supervisory Mentoring Behavior, and Job Satisfaction. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 24 (11/12): 701-710.

Handoko, T. Hani. 1995. Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

http://www.akuntanpublik.org.

IAI-KAP. 2001. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik Per 1 Januari 2001. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Ikhsan, Arfan dan Muh. Ishak. 2005. Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Indriantoro, Nur dan Bambang Supomo. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Jusup, Al. Haryono. 2001. Auditing. Yogyakarta: Bagian Penerbitan STIE YKPN.

Kreitner, Robert dan Angele Kinicki. 2003. Pengantar Organisasi Buku 1. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Kumadji, S. dkk. 2004. Pemberdayaan Perempuan dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. 16 (1): 35-46.

Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2003. Metode Riset untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Kuntari, Yeni dan Indra Wijaya Kusuma. 2001. Pengalaman Organisasi, Evaluasi terhadap Kinerja dan Hasil Karir pada Kantor Akuntansi Publik: Pengujian Pengaruh Gender. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia. 1 (16): 74-87.

Kusumawardani. 2005. Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi dan Komitmen Profesional terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Auditor (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntansi Publik di Eks-Karisidenen Surakarta). Skripsi FE UMS.

Kussudyarsana.2006. Komputer Statistik. Lab. Manajemen FE UMS.

Kwelju, Junus. 2004. Pengaruh Motivasi, Perilaku Pemimpin, dan Kesempatan Pengembangan Karir terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Ekonomi UNMER. 8 (3): 501-516.

Luthans, F. 1995. Organization Behavior. Mc. Graw-Hill International Editions.

Mansfield, Phyllis Kernaff et.al. 1991. The Job Climate for Women In Traditionally Mole Blue-Collar Occupations. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 25 (1/2): 63-79.

Mulyadi. 2002. Auditing. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Mulyadi dan Puradiredja. 1998. Auditing. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Murgai, Sarla R. 1991. Attitudes Toward Women as Managers in Library and Information Science. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 24 (11/12): 681-700.

Nasruddin, Umar. 1999. Argumen Kesetaraan Jender: Perspektif Al Qur'an. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Nasution, S. 1996. Metode Research: Penelitian Ilmiah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan dkk. 2002. Statistik Terapan untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

PPA FE UMS. 2006. Modul Pelatihan Analisis Statistik dengan SPSS. Lab. Akuntansi FE UMS.

Prawirosentono, Suyadi. 1999. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan: Kiat membangun Organisasi Kompetitif Menjelang Perdagangan Bebas Dunia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Reksohadiprodjo, S. 1990. Manajemen Strategi. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Roos, Patricia A. 1985. Gender and Work: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Societies. New York: State University of New York Press.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi 10, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.

Sahrah, Alimatus. 2004. Persepsi terhadap Kepemimpinan Perempuan. Anima. 19(3): 222-233.

Salim, Peter. 1979. The Scribne-Bantam English Dictionary. Jakarta: Modern English Press.

Trisnaningsih, Sri. 2004. Perbedaan Kinerja Auditor Dilihat dari Segi Gender. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia. 7 (1): 108-123.

Yash. 2003. Transeksualisme: Sebuah Studi Kasus Perkembangan Transseksual Perempuan ke Laki-laki. Semarang: CV. Aini.

Data Master Komitmen Organisasional

28/02/2007 13:31:05 1/1

ko1 ko2 ko3 ko4 ko5 ko6 ko7 ko8 ko9 ko10 ko11 ko121 2 2 3 2 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 42 2 3 4 3 3 4 2 3 3 3 3 33 2 2 3 2 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 34 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 25 2 2 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 36 3 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 37 4 4 3 2 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 48 2 2 3 2 4 3 4 3 3 4 2 29 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2

10 2 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 411 3 2 3 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 312 2 2 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 313 2 2 4 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 414 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 315 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 316 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 317 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 2 2 218 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 219 2 2 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 420 3 3 4 2 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 2

Data Master Komitmen Profesional

28/02/2007 13:31:54 1/2

kp1 kp2 kp3 kp4 kp5 kp6 kp7 kp8 kp9 kp10 kp11 kp12 kp131 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 22 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 33 2 2 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 44 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 45 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 36 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 3 3 4 4 4 37 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 48 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 39 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4

10 3 3 3 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 411 5 5 5 3 3 5 4 5 3 4 3 3 412 4 4 4 4 5 3 2 3 4 4 4 4 313 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 414 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 315 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 416 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 317 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 418 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 419 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 220 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Data Master Komitmen Profesional

28/02/2007 13:31:54 2/2

kp14 kp15 kp16 kp17 kp181 3 2 4 4 42 4 3 2 3 43 4 4 4 4 44 4 4 4 3 45 2 2 2 2 26 3 3 3 3 47 4 2 3 4 48 3 3 4 4 49 4 4 3 3 3

10 4 2 3 4 411 4 4 4 4 312 3 3 4 4 413 4 3 4 4 414 4 3 4 4 415 4 3 2 3 416 2 3 4 4 417 4 3 3 4 418 4 3 3 4 419 3 2 1 2 320 4 3 3 4 4

Data Master Motivasi

28/02/2007 13:35:36 1/1

m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8 m9 m101 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 42 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 43 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 44 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 45 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 46 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 47 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 48 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 49 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 5

10 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 411 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 312 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 413 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 414 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 415 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 416 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 417 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 418 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 419 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 320 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4

Data Master Kepuasan Kerja

28/02/2007 13:36:08 1/1

kk1 kk2 kk3 kk41 3 3 3 32 3 4 3 23 2 4 3 34 4 4 3 45 4 4 4 46 5 5 3 57 4 4 4 48 4 4 3 39 3 4 4 4

10 4 4 4 411 4 4 4 412 3 4 3 313 4 4 3 214 2 3 3 315 3 3 3 216 2 3 3 317 4 4 3 318 3 3 3 319 3 3 3 320 4 4 3 3

Reliability

****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******

R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)

Mean Std Dev Cases

1. KO1 2.6000 .9947 20.0 2. KO2 2.6000 1.0463 20.0 3. KO3 3.1500 .9881 20.0 4. KO4 2.2500 .5501 20.0 5. KO5 3.2500 .9665 20.0 6. KO6 3.4500 .6863 20.0 7. KO7 3.3500 1.0400 20.0 8. KO8 3.3500 .8127 20.0 9. KO9 3.2500 .6387 20.0 10. KO10 3.1000 .7881 20.0 11. KO11 2.9500 .8256 20.0 12. KO12 2.9500 .7592 20.0

N ofStatistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables SCALE 36.2500 49.6711 7.0478 12

Item-total Statistics

Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted

KO1 33.6500 42.7658 .4547 .8992KO2 33.6500 39.9237 .6544 .8878KO3 33.1000 39.5684 .7342 .8826KO4 34.0000 45.6842 .4954 .8955KO5 33.0000 39.2632 .7821 .8797KO6 32.8000 42.2737 .7761 .8833KO7 32.9000 38.4105 .7896 .8790KO8 32.9000 41.9895 .6666 .8868KO9 33.0000 44.4211 .5688 .8923KO10 33.1500 44.1342 .4695 .8962KO11 33.3000 43.5895 .4954 .8952KO12 33.3000 43.4842 .5604 .8920

Reliability Coefficients

N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 12

Alpha = .8977

Page 1

Reliability ****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******

R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)

Mean Std Dev Cases

1. KP1 3.2000 .8335 20.0 2. KP2 3.6000 .8826 20.0 3. KP3 3.6000 .7539 20.0 4. KP4 3.7000 .4702 20.0 5. KP5 3.6000 .8208 20.0 6. KP6 3.5500 .6048 20.0 7. KP7 3.5500 .7592 20.0 8. KP8 3.6000 .6806 20.0 9. KP9 3.8000 .4104 20.0 10. KP10 3.7000 .6569 20.0 11. KP11 3.6500 .5871 20.0 12. KP12 3.6000 .5982 20.0 13. KP13 3.4500 .6863 20.0 14. KP14 3.5500 .6863 20.0 15. KP15 2.9500 .6863 20.0 16. KP16 3.2000 .8944 20.0 17. KP17 3.5500 .6863 20.0 18. KP18 3.7500 .5501 20.0

N ofStatistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables SCALE 63.6000 56.3579 7.5072 18

R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)

Item-total Statistics

Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted

KP1 60.4000 48.8842 .5816 .8900KP2 60.0000 49.7895 .4648 .8949KP3 60.0000 48.8421 .6593 .8871KP4 59.9000 52.8316 .4836 .8934KP5 60.0000 48.8421 .5964 .8894KP6 60.0500 52.0500 .4517 .8938KP7 60.0500 50.8921 .4514 .8943KP8 60.0000 50.3158 .5778 .8900KP9 59.8000 53.4316 .4597 .8942KP10 59.9000 50.3053 .6032 .8893KP11 59.9500 51.7342 .5066 .8923KP12 60.0000 50.8421 .6046 .8896KP13 60.1500 50.3447 .5690 .8903KP14 60.0500 50.6816 .5327 .8914KP15 60.6500 50.1342 .5919 .8896KP16 60.4000 49.0947 .5156 .8930KP17 60.0500 49.6289 .6471 .8878KP18 59.8500 51.7132 .5488 .8914

Page 1

Reliability Coefficients

N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 18

Alpha = .8967

Page 2

Reliability ****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******

R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)

Mean Std Dev Cases

1. M1 3.7500 .4443 20.0 2. M2 3.4000 .5982 20.0 3. M3 3.7000 .4702 20.0 4. M4 3.9000 .5525 20.0 5. M5 3.4000 .5982 20.0 6. M6 3.6000 .5026 20.0 7. M7 3.3500 .5871 20.0 8. M8 3.6500 .4894 20.0 9. M9 3.9000 .3078 20.0 10. M10 3.9500 .3940 20.0

N ofStatistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables SCALE 36.6000 10.6737 3.2671 10

Item-total Statistics

Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted

M1 32.8500 8.9763 .5635 .8331M2 33.2000 8.3789 .5592 .8339M3 32.9000 8.9368 .5392 .8348M4 32.7000 8.5368 .5673 .8323M5 33.2000 8.5895 .4923 .8410M6 33.0000 8.8421 .5282 .8357M7 33.2500 8.6184 .4962 .8402M8 32.9500 8.5763 .6482 .8250M9 32.7000 9.2737 .6963 .8300M10 32.6500 9.1868 .5575 .8346

Reliability Coefficients

N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 10

Alpha = .8481

Page 1

Reliability ****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******

R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)

Mean Std Dev Cases

1. KK1 3.4000 .8208 20.0 2. KK2 3.7500 .5501 20.0 3. KK3 3.2500 .4443 20.0 4. KK4 3.2500 .7864 20.0

N ofStatistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables SCALE 13.6500 4.2395 2.0590 4

Item-total Statistics

Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted

KK1 10.2500 2.0921 .6207 .6981KK2 9.9000 2.7263 .6663 .6805KK3 10.4000 3.3053 .4561 .7763KK4 10.4000 2.1474 .6394 .6801

Reliability Coefficients

N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 4

Alpha = .7697

Page 1

Mann-Whitney Test :

Ranks

7 13.14 92.0013 9.08 118.0020

7 9.86 69.0013 10.85 141.0020

7 10.07 70.5013 10.73 139.5020

7 6.00 42.0013 12.92 168.0020

AuditorWanitaPriaTotalWanitaPriaTotalWanitaPriaTotalWanitaPriaTotal

KO

KP

M

KK

N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

Test Statisticsb

27.000 41.000 42.500 14.000118.000 69.000 70.500 42.000

-1.500 -.360 -.240 -2.535.134 .719 .810 .011

.157a

.757a

.817a

.011a

Mann-Whitney UWilcoxon WZAsymp. Sig. (2-tailed)Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailedSig.)]

KO KP M KK

Not corrected for ties.a.

Grouping Variable: Auditorb.