dac work on multilateral aid emily bosch dac network on development evaluation 10 february 2010

12
DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Upload: sharon-richard

Post on 23-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

DAC Work on Multilateral Aid

Emily BoschDAC Network on Development

Evaluation10 February 2010

Page 2: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Multilateral Aid and the DAC

1. Aid Predictability: Forward Spending Survey

2. Division of Labour: Global Fragmentation & Concentration

3. Annual Multilateral Aid Report

Page 3: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Forward Spending Survey

• Only global survey on donors’ future aid

• Survey shows little sign of raised levels of ambition for 2010 targets, outlook for 2011 no more encouraging.

• Multilateral agencies account for most of increased allocations to LICs

Page 4: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Global Fragmentation & Concentration

• Bilateral and Multilateral donors

• Donor fragmentation across countries is increasing

• Allocation rules do not internalise aid from other donors

Page 5: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Non-significant donor relationships: Opportunities for concentration

Page 6: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Multilateral Trends

• +/- 30% share of multilateral ODA

• 2008: 82% ML aid to IDA, EC, UN, Global Fund

• Even greater concentration when non-core or funds channelled through multilaterals is included, special topic in 2010 report

Page 7: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Gross ODA provided by DAC members countries 1987 – 2008

20%

22%

24%

26%

28%

30%

32%

34%

36%

38%

40%

'87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08

Multilateral ODA as share of total ODA 1987-2008(disbursements )

(DAC Members, excluding EC and including Korea)

multilateral as share of gross ODA excluding bilateral debt relief (%)

multilateral as share of gross ODA (%)

Page 8: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Multilateral ODA disbursements by DAC member 2006 - 2008 annual average

(in USD billions, excluding debt relief)

Page 9: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Trends of Multilateral Aid Allocation

Page 10: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Total bilateral ODA = 116 bn

Bilateral, Non-core and Core Multilateral Aid in 2008 (Disbursements from DAC members in USD)

Multi-bi/non-core = 16 bn

Multilateral ODA = 36 bn

Bilateral ODA (excluding multi-bi) = 100 bn

Total use of multilateral organisations = 52 bn

Page 11: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

DAC countries

ODA recipients

IDA Regionalbanks

ECUN

agenciesOther multi

99 bn 54 bn 25 bn 37 bn

( ) Reflows (not including interest payments)

643 bn

100 bn 40 bn** 87 bn

(18 bn)

33 bn

(9 bn)

26 bn

Total multilateral inflows = 276 bn

Total flows to ODA recipients (bilateral aid + multialteral outflows) = 957 bn

( 9 bn)(4 bn) (1 bn)*

( 87 bn)

ODA Gross disbursements (core contributions) and reflows 1999-2008, cumulative (excluding debt relief)

Constant 2007 USD billionSource: DAC aggregated statistics

2 bn

* Reflows to IFAD. * Outflows based on proportion of UN agencies that report to the DAC

IDA

2 bn

Total ODA-eligible inflows = 61 bn; inflows to agencies reporting to the DAC = 36 bn

Page 12: DAC Work on Multilateral Aid Emily Bosch DAC Network on Development Evaluation 10 February 2010

Conclusions

• Objective of work is to provide evidence for more rational allocation of aid.

• Multilateral work so far looks more in-depth at how bilateral donors fund multilateral agencies.

To what extent does the perceived or real effectiveness of multilateral agencies affect the allocation of multilateral aid?