d7.1 design of a monitoring framework for …zeroplus.org/pdf/zero plus_d7.1.pdf · interoperable...

Achieving near Zero and Positive Energy Settlements in Europe using

Advanced Energy Technology H2020 - 678407

D7.1 DESIGN OF A MONITORING FRAMEWORK FOR

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT DURING OPERATION

Author: K.Gobakis – TUC

Contributing authors: D. Kolokotsa, K. Kalaitzakis – TUC

D7.1 Design of a monitoring framework for performance assessment during operation

of 35

Deliverable nature: Other Dissemination level: Public Contractual delivery date: September 2016 Delivery date: October 2016 Version: 2.0 Number of pages: 32 Keywords: Monitoring platform, design Lead beneficiary 7 – TUC Participating beneficiaries: 1 – UoA

2 – TUM 3 – BGU

4 – UNIPG 5 – OBU 6 – CYI 8 – ABB

9 – ANERDGY 10 – FIBRAN 11 – ARCA 12 – ECO

13 – OPAC38 14 – VASSILIOU 15 – CONTEDIL

16 - JRHT


of 35

History of changes Version Date Change Page 1.0 30.09.2016 Initial release - 2.0 10.10.2016 Revised version after comments -


of 35

Executive Summary The aim of this report is to outline the main functionalities of the ZERO Plus Web-

GIS monitoring platform.

In order to support the next generation of multi-process big data and service

oriented computing, a Web-GIS platform is being developed for the gathering and

sharing of the collected data from all the case studies so that the information

flows are easily managed and interpreted, by means of spatial thematic maps

related to specific levels of information within the case studies.

An alpha version of the Web GIS platform is developed up to the date of

preparation of the present report including the key monitoring features of the

ZERO PLUS project. The next step is to develop a beta version that will

incorporate all necessary calculations that will be performed for the energy and

environmental impact assessment.


of 35

Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 4

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 5

List of figures .................................................................................................................. 6

List of tables.................................................................................................................... 7

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 8

2. Monitoring and Data Acquisition ......................................................................... 10

3. Description of the Cloud Server ............................................................................ 12

4. Description of the Communication system ............................................................ 17

5. Navigation of the Web-GIS ZERO PLUS Platform ................................................ 18

6. Required measurements per case study .............................................................. 29

7. References .......................................................................................................... 35


of 35

List of figures Figure 1: Overall layout of the Web-GIS monitoring platform ............................................ 9 Figure 2: The Data Base schema .................................................................................. 13 Figure 3: The spatial database visualisation .................................................................. 14 Figure 4: Detailed structure of the Cloud Server ............................................................ 16 Figure 5: Communication protocols overview................................................................. 17 Figure 6. The Login Page .............................................................................................. 18 Figure 7: Case studies located on map .......................................................................... 19 Figure 8. The layout of the Web GIS platform ................................................................ 20 Figure 9 : The four levels of Web GIS for each ZERO PLUS case study ........................ 21 Figure 10: 3D model of settlement and settlement level dashboard................................ 21 Figure 11: Key performance indicators for the case study .............................................. 22 Figure 12: Information for settlement energy production ................................................ 23 Figure 13: Selection of the settlement’s building to provide building’s energy production technologies.................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 14: Building’s energy production technologies (gauges) ...................................... 24 Figure 15: Building’s energy production technologies (charts) ........................................ 24 Figure 16: Energy consumption for outdoor lighting, etc. in settlement level ................... 25 Figure 17: Energy consumption for a selected building .................................................. 25 Figure 18: Energy consumption for selected building (charts) ........................................ 26 Figure 19: Meteorological conditions in settlement level (first half) ................................. 26 Figure 20: Indoor environmental quality measurements for selected building (gauges) .. 27 Figure 21: Indoor environmental quality measurements for selected building (graphs) ... 27 Figure 22: Historical data for settlement level measurements ........................................ 28 Figure 23 : Button selection to return to map of case studie ........................................... 28


of 35

List of tables Table 1. Sensor measurement table ID ......................................................................... 10 Table 2 Measurements for the France case study ......................................................... 29 Table 3. Measurements for the Italy case study ............................................................. 30 Table 4. Measurements for the UK case study .............................................................. 32 Table 5. Measurements for the Cyprus case study ........................................................ 33


of 35

1. Introduction The monitoring and evaluation of the settlements’ performance is an essential part of the ZERO-PLUS project. To this end a monitoring and performance analysis platform is created.

The aim of the present report is to analyse the characteristics and architecture of the Web GIS Platform that supports the following activities:

Assessment of the performance of the involved systems and technologies and also the global energy and environmental performance of the ZERO PLUS settlements.

In depth analysis of the results of the monitoring and generation of proper technical information for future feasibility analyses and design.

Development of the ZERO PLUS monitoring platform based upon the monitoring protocols for the energy production technologies and subsystems developed for building and for settlement level.

In order to support the next generation of multi-process big data and service oriented computing, a Web-GIS platform is being developed for the gathering and sharing of the collected data from all the case studies so that the information flows are easily managed and interpreted, by means of spatial thematic maps related to specific levels of information within the case studies. Smart interoperable sensor networks installed in the four case studies’ buildings, districts and energy subsystems will formulate the physical layer of the monitoring platform. The Web-GIS platform is designed in the following levels for each case study:

Level 1: Indoor Environmental Quality of Buildings’ Users. This includes thermal comfort (assessed by Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Percentage of People Dissatisfied (PDD) indices), visual comfort and indoor air quality.

Level 2: Energy demand profiles for buildings and district (public lighting). The measured energy demand and consumption profiles are collected in this level.

Level 3: Energy production technologies monitoring level. In this level the energy flows within the energy production subsystems for each case study will be monitored. The electrical and thermal parameters of each technology will be gathered and analysed.

Level 4: The Case Studies Integrated Resources Management Level and Dashboard. The design of this level will be such as to allow the monitoring of the overall district/case study following smart grid’s configurations. The specific level allows the effective management of energy demand and production profiles in order to achieve the ZERO-PLUS objectives.


of 35

The overall layout of the monitoring platform is depicted in Figure 1 and is comprised of:

The monitoring devices and data acquisition units at building and at settlement level. In Figure 1 they are represented with the case studies’ flags.

The Cloud Server which incorporates: o The database for storing the monitoring data of each settlement. o The spatial database for the geographical data of each settlement. o The GeoServer for displaying the geographical data. o The Application Server which communicates the data to the end

user and the Front End of the ZERO PLUS monitoring platform. The Communication system between the data acquisition units and the

Cloud Server.

Measuring Devices

Data Collector

IP Connection

Future zero energy settlements

Measuring Devices

Data Collector

IP Connection

Measuring Devices

Data Collector

IP Connection

Measuring Devices

Data Collector

IP Connection

Cloud Server

Front End

Database

Application Server

Spatial Database

Backend services

End User

Figure 1: Overall layout of the Web-GIS monitoring platform

The Web-GIS platform is presented in detail in the next sections.


of 35

2. Monitoring and Data Acquisition A large amount of data will be generated in each settlement. A common

description and reference of the data collected from the settlements must be

given in order to reduce the complexity of the Web-GIS platform. A detailed list of

all measurements and the related Level of Web-GIS platform are tabulated in

Table 1. The list includes the measurements for the indoor environment of the

settlement’s buildings, the energy consumption of the buildings, the energy

production technologies and subsystems either integrated into the buildings or at

district level, as well as the external meteorological conditions.

Table 1. Sensor measurement table ID

ID Level Description Measurement

unit 1 1 Space temperature °C 2 1 Space relative humidity % 3 1 Space CO2 level ppm 4 1 Space occupancy 0/1 5 1 Space Illumination Lux 6 2 Space equipment electric power W 7 2 Space equipment electric energy consumption Wh 8 2 Space light electric power W 9 2 Space light electric consumption Wh

10 2 Space HVAC electric power W 11 2 Space HVAC electric consumption Wh 12 3 WindRail PV electric power W 13 3 WindRail PV electric energy production Wh 14 3 WindRail Wind turbine electric power W 15 3 WindRail Wind turbine electric energy production Wh 16 3 FAE electric energy power W 17 3 FAE electric energy production Wh 18 3 FAE thermal power W 19 3 FAE thermal energy production Wh 20 3 SB-Skin electric power W 21 3 SB-Skin electric energy produced Wh 22 2 Building equipment electric power W 23 2 Building equipment electric consumption Wh 24 2 Building light electric power W 25 2 Building light electric consumption Wh


of 35

ID Level Description Measurement

unit 26 2 Building HVAC electric power W 27 2 Building HVAC electric consumption Wh 28 2 External light electric power W 29 2 External light electric consumption Wh 30 2 Building thermal energy consumption Wh 31 2 Building oil consumption m3 32 2 Building gas consumption m3 33 2 Building electric power (consumption) W 34 2 Building electric consumption Wh 35 2 Building electric power (production) W 36 2 Building electric production Wh 37 2 Building power W 38 2 Building energy consumption Wh 39 2 Building energy production Wh 40 2 Settlement outdoor light power W 41 2 Settlement outdoor light electric consumption Wh 42 2 Settlement buildings electric power W 43 2 Settlement buildings electric energy consumption Wh 44 2 Settlement building thermal power W 45 2 Settlement building thermal energy consumption Wh 46 3 Settlement PV power W 47 3 Settlement PV electric energy production Wh 48 3 Settlement Wind turbine power W 49 3 Settlement Wind turbine electric energy production Wh 50 2 Settlement total electric power (consumption) W 51 2 Settlement total electric power (production) W 52 2 Settlement total thermal energy production Wh 53 2 Settlement total energy production Wh 54 2 Settlement total energy consumption Wh 55 1,2 Outdoor air temperature °C 56 1,2 Relative humidity % 57 1,2 Wind speed m/s 58 1,2 Wind direction Degrees 59 1,2 Rain mm 60 1,2 Global radiation on horizontal surface W/m2

The local data acquisition (DAQ) unit in each settlement should have the ability to interconnect to the various sensors using various protocols (wire or wireless) in


of 35

order to measure all the required measurements. Also, DAQs must have the ability to transfer the measurements via Internet IP connectivity. The communication between the settlements’ DAQs and the Web-GIS platform is described in Section 4.

3. Description of the Cloud Server The Cloud Server is the heart of the Web-GIS monitoring platform and supports the data management, as well as the security and visualisation of the ZERO PLUS system. The operating system of the Cloud Server is Linux, distribution Debian [1], due to the following characteristics:

It is open-source software. It supports the latest release of various open source programs and libraries. It inherits security features.

The Cloud Server is comprised of the parts described in the following paragraphs and depicted in Figure 1.

3.1 The database for storing the monitoring data of each settlement

The database that stores the measurements data (see Table 1) should fulfil the

following requirements:

Variability of user access levels to ensure security of the data.

Ability to store different data objects as files, floats, photos, maps, etc.

Interconnection with several software and programming languages, such as

Java, C, JavaScript, PHP, etc.

Various database management systems are available and ready to use for any

specific application. PostgreSQL is selected to support the data storage of the

ZERO PLUS Web-GIS monitoring platform [2].

Three different user account types are anticipated for accessing the data stored in the database to ensure the platform’s security:

Account type 1: Administrator. This account has full access to all functionalities.

Account type 2: Internal account. This allows the communication of the Cloud Server with the Data Acquisition Units.

Account type 3: Internal account. This allows for the communication of the database with the Application Server.


of 35

The database schema and the various database entities’ relations are depicted in

Figure 2. The various entities include building and settlement level information for

all monitored parameters tabulated in Table 1.

Figure 2: The Data Base schema

3.2 The spatial database for the geographical data of each settlement

The spatial database includes the following data:

Geographical data extracted from the OpenStreet Map Project [2]. 3D models of the four ZERO PLUS buildings and energy production

technologies.

The specific feature supports the visualisation and spatial distribution of the ZERO PLUS measurements in geographical maps (see Figure 3).


of 35

Figure 3: The spatial database visualisation

3.3 The GeoServer for displaying the geographical data The GeoServer is introduced to manage the spatial data stored in the spatial database and provides the final image visualised by the end user [3](see Figure 3). The GeoServer should:

Support various types of spatial data format (vector, raster, KML, ESRI Shapefile, GeoJSON datasets).

Implement the various services required for the visualisation such as the Web Map Service, the Web Coverage Service and the Web Processing Service.

Support a web-based interface for its own configuration.

Provide editing facility for all types of geospatial data.

The following geospatial data servers were examined and tested for the needs of the ZERO PLUS monitoring platform:

GeoServer

MapGuide Open Source

Mapnik

MapServer

Most of the aforementioned servers cover partially the ZERO PLUS requirements apart from GeoServer which covers all the ZERO PLUS specifications. For that reason, the specific geospatial data server has been selected for the ZERO PLUS application.


of 35

3.4 The Application Server The Application Server communicates the data to the end user via the Front End of the ZERO PLUS monitoring platform. It is comprised of the parts described in the following paragraphs.

3.4.1 The Front End of the ZERO PLUS monitoring platform The Front End is designed to allow the visualisation of the ZERO PLUS monitoring data using any web-browser, such as Internet Explorer 9 and higher, Firefox Mozilla, Google Chrome, etc. Therefore, the data visualisation does not require any installation of extra software.

The Front End should:

Require low memory and computational power.

Support various types of spatial data formats (GeoJSON, Web Map Service, ESRI Shapefile).

Support complex 3D models with small size files.

The following Front Ends were examined and tested for the needs of the ZERO PLUS monitoring platform:

Geomajas

OpenLayers

Leafletjs

GIScene.js

Leafletjs

Turfjs

OpenLayers – Cesium

Finally, the libraries OpenLayers – Cesium are chosen as the more efficient option.

3.4.2 Data visualization The data visualisation feature supports all various chart types, i.e. Basic line with data label, time series, Spline graph, Area graph, Stacked and grouped column, Pie chart, Gauges, Heat maps, etc.

The following three visualisation libraries were tested for the ZERO PLUS data chart types:

D3’s

Fusioncharts

Highcharts


of 35

Highcharts are selected as the most efficient library for the ZERO PLUS [4].

All the above is depicted in Figure 4 where all different hardware and software

tools and technologies for the Cloud Server are interconnected.

Figure 4: Detailed structure of the Cloud Server


of 35

4. Description of the Communication system The communication system must comply with specific standards in order to ensure the interconnection of the settlements’ components and technologies (via the DAQs) with the ZERO PLUS Web-GIS monitoring platform. An overview of the communication system is illustrated in Figure 5. The communication system consists of:

The communication protocol between the DAQ and the Cloud Server.

The communication protocol between the Front End and the end user.

The communication protocols between the various parts of the Cloud Server.

The interconnection between the DAQ and the Cloud Server is based on Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol which ensures data privacy and safety. The implementation of the TLS protocol is based on the HTTPS protocol as depicted in Figure 5.

All the measurements gathered by the local DAQs must be transmitted to the Web-GIS monitoring platform following one of the next services:

1) Using the web services provided by the local DAQ. 2) Using Machine2Machine (M2M) communication by the local DAQ to the

Web-GIS monitoring platform 3) Implementing the developed Application Programming Interface (API) by

the local DAQs.

In order to use any of the above services the transition channel must be encrypted in order to ensure the anonymity and privacy of the settlements’ users.

Figure 5: Communication protocols overview

The communication protocol between the Front End and the end user is performed via Internet using secure transfer protocols. The various end user categories have specific privileges for security purposes:

1. Administrator: access to all available data form all settlements and capability to modify the database.


of 35

2. Researchers: will have only read access to all available data from all settlements.

3. Building owners: The building users have access to their own building data.

4. Public account: access only to average values without specifying the building owners’ details.

The communication between the various parts of the Cloud Server is implemented using their APIs and services.

5. Navigation of the Web-GIS ZERO PLUS Platform The Web-GIS monitoring platform opens through any web browser with a Login Page (see Figure 6). Then after putting the users ‘credentials the user is moved to the map of Europe where the ZERO PLUS settlements are pinpointed (see Figure 7).

Figure 6. The Login Page


of 35

Figure 7: Case studies located on map

The structure of the Web-GIS platform is illustrated in Figure 8 where all four levels exist for each case study (Figure 9).

By clicking on the ZERO PLUS logo in Figure 7 the case study area for each case study opens.

The first view of each case study is its dashboard (Level 4) where three tabs are available (Figure 10):

General information which includes some initial details of the case study (Figure 10).

Key performance indicators which are indicatively depicted in Figure 11. Detailed information which will be explained in detail later in this section. Historical data to be seen by the researchers explained in detail later in

this section.


of 35

Figure 8. The layout of the Web GIS platform


of 35

Figure 9 : The four levels of Web GIS for each ZERO PLUS case study

Figure 10: 3D model of settlement and settlement level dashboard

Level 4: The Web-GIS Dashboard

Level 3: Energy Production

Technologies

Level 2: Energy demand profiles for buildings

and districts

Level 1: Indoor Environmental

Quality of Users


of 35

Figure 11: Key performance indicators for the case study

By clicking on the ‘Detailed information’ tab four subtabs are opened:

The energy production for energy technologies installed on buildings and at settlement level (Level 3, see Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15)

The energy consumption of the buildings and the settlement (Level 2, see Figure 16, Figure 17, Figure 18)

The meteorological conditions for each settlement (Figure 19) Indoor environmental quality (Level 1 see Error! Reference source not

found., Figure 20, Figure 21)


of 35

Figure 12: Information for settlement energy production

Figure 13: Selection of the settlement’s building to provide building’s energy production technologies


of 35

Figure 14: Building energy production technologies (gauges)

Figure 15: Building energy production technologies (charts)


of 35

Figure 16: Energy consumption for outdoor lighting, etc. at settlement level

Figure 17: Energy consumption for a selected building


of 35

Figure 18: Energy consumption for a selected building (charts)

Figure 19: Meteorological conditions at settlement level


of 35

Figure 20: Indoor environmental quality measurements for a selected building (gauges)

Figure 21: Indoor environmental quality measurements for a selected building (graphs)

The user can access the historical data for all measurement at settlement level from the beginning of the monitoring period (the monitoring period has not started yet as the settlements are still at implementation phase) by clicking on the fourth tab ‘Historical data’. The user can select by means of cursors the desired data period, Figure 22. The selected data can be exported in different formats like xls, jpg, etc.

The user can return to the case studies map by clicking on the globe button (Figure 23).


of 35

Figure 22: Historical data for settlement level measurements

Figure 23 : Button selection to return to the map of the case studies


of 35

6. Required measurements per case study Due to the geographical spread of the different settlements of the project (from

Cyprus to the UK), different energy production and energy conservation

technologies have been selected for each location. The following measurements

are required in each case study based on the installed technologies.

6.1 Case study: France Table 2 Measurements for the France case study

No Measurement name Units Range Resolution Accuracy

(±) 1 Space temperature °C 0 -50 0.1 0.5°C 2 Space relative humidity % 10-90 1 10.00% 3 Space CO2 level ppm 0-2000 20 40 ppm 4 Space occupancy 0/1 0-1 5 Space Illumination Lux 0-500 0.2 0.5lux 6 Building equipment electric power W 0-25000 0.1 0.10%

7 Building equipment electric

consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

8 Building light electric power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%

9 Building light electric

consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

10 Building HVAC electric power W 0-25000 0.1 0.10%

11 Building HVAC electric

consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

12 WindRail PV electric power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%

13 WindRail PV electric energy

production Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

14 WindRail Wind turbine electric

power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%

15 WindRail Wind turbine electric

energy production Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

16 FAE electric energy power W 0-1000 0.1 0.10%

17 FAE electric energy production Wh 0 -999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


of 35


(±) 18 FAE thermal power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%

19 FAE thermal energy production Wh 0 -999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

20 SBSkin electric power W 0-1000 0.1 0.10%

21 SBSkin electric energy produced Wh 0 -999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

22 External light electric power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%

23 External light electric

consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

24 Building district heating Wh 0 -999,999

MWh 1 0.10%

25 Settlement outdoor light power W 0-10000 0.1 0.10%

26 Settlement outdoor light electric

consumption Wh

0 -999,999 MWh

1 0.1Wh

27 Outdoor air temperature °C -40 - 64 0.1 1 28 Relative humidity % 1-100 1 4.00% 29 Wind Speed m/s 1-50 0.4 5.00% 30 Wind direction deg 0 – 360 1 3deg 31 Rain mm 0 -950 0.2 5.00% 32 Global radiation W/m2 0-2000 50 10.00%

6.2 Case study Italy Table 3. Measurements for the Italy case study


(±) 1 Space temperature °C 0 -50 0.1 0.5°C 2 Space relative humidity % 10-90 1 10.00% 3 Space CO2 level ppm 0-2000 20 40 ppm 4 Space occupancy 0/1 0-1 5 Space Illumination Lux 0-500 0.2 0.5lux

6 Building equipment

electric power W 0-25000 0.1 0.10%


electric consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


of 35


(±)


power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%


consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


power W 0-25000 0.1 0.10%


consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

12 WindRail PV electric

power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%

13 WindRail PV electric energy production

Wh 0 -

99,999,999 MWh

1 0.1Wh

14 WindRail Wind turbine



electric energy production Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

16 Building PV electric power W 0-500000 /

0-50000 0.1 0.10%

17 Building PV electric energy produced

Wh 0 -999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%


consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

20 Building oil consumption

(cumulative) m3 0 -5 0.01 10.00%

21 Building gas consumption m3 0-10 0.01 10.00%

22 Settlement outdoor light

power W 0-10000 0.1 0.10%



0 -999,999 MWh

1 0.1Wh

24 Outdoor air temperature °C -40 - 64 0.1 1 25 Relative humidity % 1-100 1 4.00% 26 Wind Speed m/s 1-50 0.4 5.00%


of 35


(±) 27 Wind direction deg 0 – 360 1 3deg 28 Rain mm 0 -950 0.2 5.00% 29 Global radiation W/m2 0-2000 50 10.00%

6.3 Case study: UK Table 4. Measurements for the UK case study







0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%


consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


power W 0-25000 0.1 0.10%


consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

12 WindRail PV electric

power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%

13 WindRail PV electric energy production

Wh 0 -

99,999,999 MWh

1 0.1Wh




electric energy production Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


of 35

16 Building PV electric power W 0-500000 /

0-50000 0.1 0.10%

17 Building PV electric energy produced

Wh 0 -999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%


consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

20 Building oil consumption

(cumulative) m3 0 -5 0.01 10.00%

21 Building gas consumption m3 0-10 0.01 10.00%


power W 0-10000 0.1 0.10%



0 -999,999 MWh

1 0.1Wh

24 Outdoor air temperature °C -40 - 64 0.1 1 25 Relative humidity % 1-100 1 4.00% 26 Wind Speed m/s 1-50 0.4 5.00% 27 Wind direction deg 0 – 360 1 3deg 28 Rain mm 0 -950 0.2 5.00% 29 Global radiation W/m2 0-2000 50 10.00%

6.4 Case study: Cyprus Table 5. Measurements for the Cyprus case study







0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%


consumption Wh 0 -

99,999,999 1 0.1Wh


of 35

MWh


power W 0-25000 0.1 0.10%


consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

12 FAE electric energy

power W 0-1000 0.1 0.10%

13 FAE electric energy

production Wh 0 -999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh 14 FAE thermal power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%

15 FAE thermal energy

production Wh 0 -999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


power W 0-2000 0.1 0.10%


consumption Wh

0 -99,999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh


power W 0-10000 0.1 0.10%


electric consumption Wh 0 -999,999

MWh 1 0.1Wh

20 Outdoor air temperature °C -40 - 64 0.1 1

21 Relative humidity % 1-100 1 4.00% 22 Wind Speed m/s 1-50 0.4 5.00% 23 Wind direction deg 0 – 360 1 3deg 24 Rain mm 0 -950 0.2 5.00% 25 Global radiation W/m2 0-2000 50 10.00%


of 35

7. References

[1] B. McCarty, Learning Debian GNU-Linux, no. September. 1999.

[2] M. Haklay and P. Weber, “OpenStreet map: User-generated street maps,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 12–18, 2008.

[3] S. Giannecchini, “GeoServer: The open source geospatial server,” GEO: connexion, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 44–46, 2013.

[4] O. Eltayeby, D. John, P. Patel, and S. Simmerman, “Comparative case study between D3 & Highcharts on Lustre metadata visualization,” in IEEE Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization 2013, LDAV 2013 - Proceedings, 2013, pp. 127–128.

d7.1 design of a monitoring framework for …zeroplus.org/pdf/zero plus_d7.1.pdf · interoperable...

Documents