Ð o À n mai linh institut de physique du globe de paris
DESCRIPTION
Étude in-situ des interactions hydromécaniques entre fluides et failles Application au laboratoire du rift de Corinthe. Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris. Fault slip. Fluid pressure Build-up. Fluid Pressure decrease. Fluid-fault interactions. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ÐOÀN Mai LinhInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Étude in-situ des interactions hydromécaniques
entre fluides et failles
Application au laboratoire du rift de Corinthe
![Page 2: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Fluid-fault interactions
Fault closed
Fluid pressureBuild-up
Fault slip
Fluid Pressuredecrease
Fault-valve mechanism (Sibson70)Example of fluid-fault hydromechanical coupling:
![Page 3: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Motivations
Lots of theory andlaboratory
works
But field data:• altered outcrops after slip• dynamical seismics indirect
After Matthai (1992)
![Page 4: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
I Presentation of the Gulf of Corinth and the DGLAB project
II Characterization of the hydraulic setting
III A peculiar kind of hydraulic transients: Events triggered by far earthquakes
I Presentation of the Gulf of Corinth and the DGLAB project
II Characterization of the hydraulic setting
III A peculiar kind of hydraulic transients: Events triggered by far earthquakes
Structure of the presentation
![Page 5: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Corinth Rift
From Jolivet (2005)
Greece
Complicated geodynamics
subduction
extension
Complexgeology
Pindos
Gavrovo-Tripolitza
shear zone
Rift of Corinth
![Page 6: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Corinth Rift
1.5cm/yr
Aigio fault
1-3cm of slip
After Koukouvelas (1998)
After Bernard (1997)
![Page 7: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Deep Geodynamic LABoratory
0.5±0.1MPa
0.9±0.1MPa
karst
South North
![Page 8: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Initial hydraulic knowledge of the Aigio fault
Impervious fault
• Difference in overpressure
K=0.9-2 10-18m²(Song,2004)
• Laboratory test on core samples
• Difference in mineralization
![Page 9: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Initial hydraulic knowledge of upper aquifer
Hydraulic tests by GFZ – July 2003
(Giurgea, 2004)
Dra
wdo
wn
[m]
Double porosity model
Bulk properties
Matrix properties
Results to be taken
with caution
![Page 10: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Initial hydraulic knowledge of the karst
Q~600m³/hk=1-1.5 10-5 m/s
No storativity
k
lnRr b
2 HPg
Q
Permanent regime Dupuit formula
![Page 11: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
AIG10 permanent sensors
![Page 12: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Pressure sensors
2 absolute pressure gauges- high precision- low precision1 relative pressure gauge- hydrophone
Log10
(Frequency [Hz])
Log
10(P
ress
ure
[MP
a])
Tides
![Page 13: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Structure of the presentation
I Presentation of the Gulf of Corinth and the DGLAB project
II Characterization of the hydraulic setting
III A peculiar kind of hydraulic transients: Events triggered by far earthquakes
![Page 14: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Quality of the pressure signalPressure
Pre
ssur
e (B
ar)
UT Time
Resolution better than 1%
The pressure is similar to that of the karst The karst dominates the measured pressure
![Page 15: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Strategy
Long-termfluctuations
Tidal calibration
ThermalRegime
Tidal calibration
How sensitive is the pressure signal to deformation ?
What are the dimensions
of the aquifers ?
How waterflows through the aquifers ?
![Page 16: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Tidal inversion
Triple origine
Earth Tide (Prediction ETERNA 3.3)
Aigion
Oceanic load (P. Bernard)
Trizonia
(Aigio)
Also
Barometric pressure (V. Léonardi)
Temeni
![Page 17: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Input: Theoretical tidal strain in Aigio
Input: Barometric pressure in Temeni
Input: Tide gage in Trizonia
Ouput: pressure in Aigio
Linear regression on the input data
Analysis of the tidal signal
![Page 18: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
dP=2.748 10-4 dhoc
– 1.784 10-4 dter No offset
Analysis of the tidal signal
![Page 19: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Barometric effectBad weather at the end of the year 2003
Observed pressure (detided) Atmospheric pressure
![Page 20: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Interpretation of the coefficients
Poroelastic model (large wavelengths)
P
ter
B K u
PPatm
B 1 u
3 1 u
P
ter
B K u
P
ter
B K u
B Ku=17±1GPa =0.3±0.1
B : Skempton coefficientK
u : Undrained bulk modulus
u : Undrained Poisson ratio
: Barometric efficiency
![Page 21: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Oceanic loadN SAig10Oceanic load
Loading profile at a depth of 700m induced by a unit load
Water flux
The oceanic load should induce a phase lag !
Distance to southern shore (m)
σ xx+σ zz
/2ρg
h
AIG10
![Page 22: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Influence of boundariesN SAig10Oceanic load
Aigiofault
Helikefault
Can the presence of impervious faults explainthis absence of phase lag ?
Analytical prediction of phase lag for a 1D aquifer with impervious boundaries
![Page 23: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Oceanic load
Map of semi-diurnal phase lag (°) for a semi-infinite ocean
L
x/L
Phase lag[-5 min 5min]
[-2.5° 2.5°]
L
x
N
S
L
x
N
![Page 24: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Is Aigio fault impervious at all depths ?
![Page 25: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Tidal information
Long-termfluctuations
Tidal calibration
Thermalregime
How sensitive is the pressure signal to deformation ?
What are the dimensions
of the aquifers ?
How waterflows through the aquifers ?
Poroelastic parameters → excellent « strain » sensor
Tidal calibration
Karst confinedin a NS direction.By Aigio fault ?
Storativity → Hydraulic
diffusivity
Tidal calibration
Long-termfluctuations
![Page 26: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Long-term dataPressure
Time
Pre
ssur
e (b
ar)
1 year
14 kPa
Flow betweenthe two previouslyindependent aquifers
Nosharpseasonal variations
![Page 27: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Analytical solutionAxisymmetric response for infinite aquifers
Pre
ssur
e (b
ar)
Time (day)
Axisymmetric analytical solutions Finite aquifers
Transients controlled by the radii of the aquifers and borehole radius
![Page 28: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Development of the FEM2.1D method
1. Finite Element Method 2D to describe flow
in upper and lower aquifers
Efficient Keep the characteristic distance of the well radius
2. Manual coupling at a well node (0.1D) Same pressure Mass conservation of fluid
![Page 29: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Dimensions of the aquifers ?
Can the decrease in pressure observed during the first 3 monthsprovide constraints on the dimensions of the aquifers ?
Try to find plausible configurations
Rectangular-shaped aquifers 4 unknownsHydraulic properties of the upper aquifer 1 unknown (storativity)
2 pieces of information to fit : amplitude and duration of the drop
![Page 30: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Dimensions of the aquifers ?
Time (days)
Pre
ssur
e (b
ar)
Upper aquifer: LNS=1000m LWE=200m
Lower aquifer: LNS=5000m LWE=?
Too small
Too slow
Pertinence ofThe homogeneous
Model for the karst ?
![Page 31: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Long-termfluctuations
Storativity → Hydraulic
diffusivity
Karst confinedin a NS
direction
Poroelastic parameters → excellent « strain » sensor
Long-term information
Tidal calibration
ThermalRegime
Tidal calibration
Long-termfluctuations
Thermalregime
Hydraulicdiffusivity
(Almost) no flow
Both aquifersare confined
![Page 32: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Thermal profile
Depth (m)
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
) 1 year after drilling
![Page 33: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Heat flow measurement
=
50±10 mW/m2~22°C/km
![Page 34: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
H > 400 m
ρ
ρ
pf
P
C
HTKgaR
24 CP aRaR
Relation Ttzt
from extrapolation ofThermal gradient
Karst convection
qb= 70mW/m² qb=100mW/m² qb=200mW/m²
770m
zt
Tt
Tmes
Fault vertical offset=150m
zt-770m <150m
H>600 m Gavrovo-Tripolitza nappe
![Page 35: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Thermal anomaly
Heat generated by fault slip does not explain this anomaly
Temperature (°C)30 30.2 30.4 30.6 30.8 31 31.4 31.6 31.831.2
700
710
740
Dep
th (
m)
720
730
But the introduction of thekarst convection does.
Karst in conduction
Karst in convection
500
1000
1500
Temperature (°C)3020100 40 50 60
![Page 36: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Hydraulicdiffusivity
(Almost) no flow
Long-termfluctuations
Poroelastic parameters → excellent « strain » sensor
Thermal information
Tidal calibration
Both aquifersare confined
Thermalregime
Tidal calibration
Hydraulicdiffusivity
Internal advection
Both aquifersare confined
Large vertical extension
Low heat flow50±10 mW/m²
![Page 37: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Structure of the presentation
I Presentation of the Gulf of Corinth and the DGLAB project
II Characterization of the hydraulic setting
III A peculiar kind of hydraulic transients: Events triggered by far earthquakes
![Page 38: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
A panel of hydraulic anomalies
~2minute-long
~2minute-long ~30minute-long
~10minute-long
Only associated withteleseismic transients
~200 events/yr
~100 events/yr~20 events/yr
2 events/yr
10-400 Pa
10-200 Pa
10-200 Pa
50-60 Pa
Time
Pre
ssur
e
![Page 39: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The Mw=7.8 Rat Island Earthquake
November, 17th 2003 06:43 UTC
Drop of 60 Pa(equivalent to 3.5nstr)
5min 30min
Much earlier than other publishedtriggered events
BKu~17GPa
determined from tidal analysis
![Page 40: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Review of triggered hydraulic anomalies
Distance to epicenter (km)
Mag
nitu
de
Strain<10-8
Strain>10-8
2003Rat Island
Event
After Montgomery and Manga (2003)
![Page 41: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Comparison with other local sensors
Anomalous drop on pressure data only
h<5nstr
Aigio
Trizonia
0 10km
Sacks-EvertsonStrainmeter
STS2broad-band
Seismometer(North component)
LF signal
![Page 42: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Validity of the pressure dataNyquist frequency
of the pressure sensor
Fre
quen
cy
Time
Good correlation of both sensors
P
h
Comparison of seismic oscillations of both «deformation» sensors
- Strainmeter- Pressure
![Page 43: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Response to a dislocation
Fault movement
Average of pressureanomaly
along the borehole
Poroelastic responseHETEROGENEOUS
along the borehole
One single wellhead value
![Page 44: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Response to a dislocation
yx
y
zx
Dip direction
Average of pressure along the borehole induced by a double-couple located at (x,y)
Map of Log10
(Pressure anomaly) for D×S=1m3
Distance from borehole
~ √hydraulic
trelaxation
D×S~1m3
S= slip areaD= relative displacement
M0=DS
<5000m3 (Trizonia data)
![Page 45: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
High-frequency hydrophone data
Pressure HydrophoneClose-up
Time
+0.000
07:15
07:05 07:10 07:15
Hydrophone
UTC Time 07:07:02
+0.100
07:1007:05
07:05 07:1507:10
![Page 46: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Angle of slip
yx
y
zx
Fault plane
Slickensides
Average of pressure along the borehole induced by a double-couple located at (x,y)
Map of Log10
(Pressure anomaly) for D*S=1m3
Not seen by pressure sensor D*S<0.1-1m3
![Page 47: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
The Mw=9 Sumatra event
Data acquisition problem Irregular sampling
P S
Pressurein Aigio
Strainin Trizonia
Below Nyquist frequency
December, 26th 2004 00:58 UTC
![Page 48: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Hydraulic characterisation of AIG10● We measure the pressure of the bottom karst
● Poroelastic response to both Earth tides and ocean load Sensitive “strain” sensor
● Aquifers are confined with almost no flow at the boundariesand internal convection within the karst
● Aigio fault is impervious at the intersection with the boreholebut is it the case below the Pindos nappe
● Low heat flow
Hydraulic characterisation of AIG10
It is now possible to model the wellhead pressure response to
fault movement within an homogeneous poroelastic framework
Conclusion
Hydraulic anomalies● A large set of hydraulic anomalies.● An anomalous hydraulic anomaly
dynamically triggered by S waves from a teleseism, with a concomitant local microseismic event
Hydraulic anomalies
The DGLAB project provides the opportunityto study
dynamic fluid-fault interactions
![Page 49: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Perspectives
Interpretation of the remaining hydraulic events
• But we monitor fluids around a fault rather than fluids inside a fault
• But no independent evaluation of fluid evolution and fault movement
Better knowledge of the surrounding seismicity Better interpretation of the hydrophone signal
Better understanding of the aquifer and its heterogeneities
![Page 50: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
PerspectivesExpected full instrumentation
0 m
700 m
750 m
870 m
1000 m
Hydrophone
Hydrophone
3C Seismometer
High-precisionpressure gage
High-precisionpressure gage
Installation of thewhole instrumentation
scheduled in March 2006
![Page 51: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Link between storativities
S = uniaxial storativity 11= 22=0, dσ33=0
S = unstrained storativity =0Sσ = strained storativity dσ=0
S S Sσ
S = (1-αB) Sσ
![Page 53: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
The AIG10 borehole
0.5±0.1MPa
0.9±0.1MPa
karst
![Page 54: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Age of the karst waterSimple optimistic model :
Čermák model
T>1000 yr(In accordance
with the absence of Tritium in water)
![Page 55: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
The lower aquifer is karstic
800
900
![Page 56: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Are the aquifers well confined ?
![Page 57: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Long-termfluctuations
All the three studies were necessary
Tidal calibration
Thermalregime
Tidal calibration
![Page 58: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Pressure sensors
2 absolute pressure gauges- high precision- low precision1 relative pressure gauge- hydrophone
Log10
(Frequency [Hz])
Log
10(P
ress
ure
[MP
a])
Tides
![Page 59: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Development of the FEM2.1D method
1. Finite Element Method 2D on each aquifer2. Manual coupling at a well node (0.1D)
Efficient Keep the characteristic distance of the well radius
Analytical axisymmetric solutions shows that the transitory regime
is partly controlled by the borehole radius
![Page 60: Ð O À N Mai Linh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081515/56812e25550346895d938915/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Conclusion
Hydraulic anomalies● A large set of hydraulic anomalies.
● A anomalous hydraulic anomaly dynamically triggered by S waves from a teleseism,
with concomitant a local seismic event
Borehole instrumentation provides tools to understand the triggering mechanism
Hydraulic characterisation of AIG10● We measure the pressure of the bottom karst
● Poroelastic response to both Earth tides and ocean load Sensitive “strain” sensor
● Aquifers are confined with almost no flow at the boundariesbut internal convection within the karst
● Aigio fault is impervious at the intersection with the boreholebut is it the case below ?
● Low heat flow and rigid block. Not a process zone.