cutting edge geochemistry detects organic … limit of one part-per-trillion (ppt) now proven to be...

1
Surficial soil surveys analyzed for inorganic elements have proven to be a useful predictive geochemistry in determining the location of deeply buried exploration targets. Organic components have also been sited as a potentially useful geochemical tool. In the last ten years, our research has been conducted to study and improve upon the use of organic compounds as a geochemical exploration tool. Bacteria that leach and metabolize compounds from mineral deposits or petroleum plays at depth eventually release hydrocarbons that migrate to the surface. Surficial samples such as soil, sediments, peat, humus, etc., act as collectors of these hydrocarbons. Past researchers have used very volatile compounds in the C1 to C4 carbon series range, and have also hypothesized the use of heavier hydrocarbons. Our research has resulted in a geochemistry, defined as (SGH), which extracts the organic compounds absorbed on the surface of B-Horizon soil samples specifically for the heavier organic compounds in the C5 to C17 carbon series range. These compounds may migrate from depth in a volatile form but are not gaseous at ambient temperature and pressure. The SGH technique analyzes each sample for over 160 specific hydrocarbons at a detection limit of one part-per-trillion (ppt) now proven to be the remnants of these bacterial actions. The data was reviewed forensically resulting in specific combinations and ratios of the hydrocarbons monitored which defined different organic signatures found to be directly related to the target. The surficial geochromatographic dispersion of these organic compounds has also been researched and found to be able to vector to the location of buried exploration targets. SGH is thus a dual purpose deep penetrating predictive geochemistry that both locates and identifies the type of target that may be present. The SGH geochemical signature has been demonstrated at successfully locating mineral targets at depths of up to 700 metres and has identified targets of Uranium, Gold, SEDEX, VMS, Nickel, Copper, Kimberlite formations and Petroleum plays from actual surveys. Soil Gas Hydrocarbons Overview Case Studies Several deposit types (lode Au, magmatic Cu-Ni, porphry Cu, skarn Cu, U, VMS, diamond) and environments (glaciated to arid) have been the subject of SGH survey studies. SGH is a dual purpose method that can locate a buried target as well as identify the type of target present. A pattern recognition approach to the data has resulted in defining specific SGH signatures for various types of targets. The SGH signatures in surveys over , , , , and as well as targets have been extensively studied. Gold Nickel VMS SEDEX Uranium Copper Kimberlite Pipe What does an SGH signature look like? Pattern in red is the mineral signature MGS Ruttan This SGH sample signature contains a “visible” portion of the buried VMS target signature. soil Consistent SGH target signatures. Similar signatures are in the as in these VMS rock specimen samples from different locations and of various ages. ore SGH target, different location Another SGH sample signature that contains a “visible” portion of the buried VMS target signature. soil Noranda - Gilmour 0 10 20 30 kCounts 0 10 20 30 kCounts 0 10 20 30 kCounts 0 10 20 30 kCounts file6103.ms file6104.ms file6124.ms file6125.ms "Modern " Zn-Cu Deposit #3 "Modern " Zn-Cu Deposit #6 "Pre-Cambrian " Zn-Cu Deposit Kidd-Creek "Pre-Cambrian " Zn-Cu Deposit Mattabi Mattabi Kidd-Creek Black Smoker Black Smoker FORENSIC PATTERN RECOGNITION APPROACH Suspect 1 has DNA matching the sperm residue found on the victim. Forensic DNA identification is considered a certainty based on this pattern recognition. As a Forensic-type of identification, SGH provides high confidence by using 162 parameters for pattern recognition. SGH has a different signature for VMS (shown in red) than that of a kimberlite (shown in yellow). Background Cutting Edge Geochemistry Detects Organic Signatures in Surficial Samples Originating from Bacterial-Mineral Interactions to Locate and Identify Deeply Buried Exploration Targets Ore or Kimberlite Pockets of bacterial colonies Accumulating vertical movement around outside of target Bacterial remnant movements Surface SGH Halo Samples Sutherland – Nov-06 B-Horizon SGH class signature x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x REDUCTION ZONE OXIDATION ZONE OXIDATION ZONE x REDOX Cell - SGH Response SGH located and identified the Kimberlite Pipe. It was later revealed that there was excellent correlation to the geophysical magnetic anomaly. Kimberlite Case Study Shear Minerals Raw Data Plot WMC: Diana - Gold Ore Body Location Mineralization Deposit Cover and Thickness Sample Spacing : 30km southeast of Kambalda, Australia - hyperarid environment : paleochannel gold mineralization (1 Mt @ 2.5 g/t) : consists of a series of stacked flat-lying structures host to the mineralization : consolidated dune sands with a poor developed B-horizon : 25m over mineralization, 50m over background, 100m between sample lines Kimberlite Case Study Diadem has made these SGH findings public Kimberlite Pipe No. 105 Parry Peninsula Kimberlite Field Location of drill-confirmed diamondiferous kimberlite SGH signature predicts kimberlite pipe under Bright Lake, Manitoba Lake bottom sediments were taken with an Eckman dredge sampler from a canoe, depth > 4 metres Uranium Case Study Definitive anomaly for Uranium deposit in Nevada Possible roll-front type uranium Excellent correlation with Radon gas survey Dale Sutherland [email protected] Dale Sutherland [email protected] Activation Laboratories Ltd. 1336 Sandhill Drive Ancaster, Ontario L9G 4V5 Phone: (905) 648-9611 Fax: (905) 648-9613 [email protected] www.actlabs.com Activation Laboratories Ltd. 1336 Sandhill Drive Ancaster, Ontario L9G 4V5 Phone: (905) 648-9611 Fax: (905) 648-9613 [email protected] www.actlabs.com With permission from Harold Westdahl

Upload: nguyendung

Post on 24-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Surficial soil surveys analyzed for inorganic elements have proven to be a usefulpredictive geochemistry in determining the location of deeply buried explorationtargets. Organic components have also been sited as a potentially usefulgeochemical tool. In the last ten years, our research has been conducted to studyand improve upon the use of organic compounds as a geochemical explorationtool.

Bacteria that leach and metabolize compounds from mineral deposits orpetroleum plays at depth eventually release hydrocarbons that migrate to thesurface. Surficial samples such as soil, sediments, peat, humus, etc., act ascollectors of these hydrocarbons. Past researchers have used very volatilecompounds in the C1 to C4 carbon series range, and have also hypothesized theuse of heavier hydrocarbons. Our research has resulted in a geochemistry,defined as (SGH), which extracts the organiccompounds absorbed on the surface of B-Horizon soil samples specifically for theheavier organic compounds in the C5 to C17 carbon series range. Thesecompounds may migrate from depth in a volatile form but are not gaseous atambient temperature and pressure.

The SGH technique analyzes each sample for over 160 specific hydrocarbons at adetection limit of one part-per-trillion (ppt) now proven to be the remnants of thesebacterial actions. The data was reviewed forensically resulting in specificcombinations and ratios of the hydrocarbons monitored which defined differentorganic signatures found to be directly related to the target. The surficialgeochromatographic dispersion of these organic compounds has also beenresearched and found to be able to vector to the location of buried explorationtargets. SGH is thus a dual purpose deep penetrating predictive geochemistrythat both locates and identifies the type of target that may be present.

The SGH geochemical signature has been demonstrated at successfully locatingmineral targets at depths of up to 700 metres and has identified targets of Uranium,Gold, SEDEX, VMS, Nickel, Copper, Kimberlite formations and Petroleum playsfrom actual surveys.

Soil Gas Hydrocarbons

Overview Case Studies

Several deposit types (lode Au, magmatic Cu-Ni, porphry Cu, skarn Cu, U, VMS,diamond) and environments (glaciated to arid) have been the subject of SGHsurvey studies.

SGH is a dual purpose method that can locate a buried target as well as identify the type of targetpresent. A pattern recognition approach to the data has resulted in defining specific SGHsignatures for various types of targets. The SGH signatures in surveys over , , ,

, and as well as targets have been extensively studied.Gold Nickel VMS

SEDEX Uranium Copper Kimberlite Pipe

What does an SGH signature look like?

Pattern in red is the

mineral signature

MGS Ruttan

This SGH sample signature contains a“visible” portion of the buried VMS targetsignature.

soil

Consistent SGH target signatures.

Similar signatures are in the as in theseVMS rock specimen samples from differentlocations and of various ages.

ore

SGH target, different location

Another SGH sample signature thatcontains a “visible” portion of the buriedVMS target signature.

soil

Noranda - Gilmour

0

10

20

30

kCounts

0

10

20

30

kCounts

0

10

20

30

kCounts

0

10

20

30

kCounts

file6103.ms

file6104.ms

file6124.ms

file6125.ms

"Modern " Zn-Cu Deposit#3

"Modern " Zn-Cu Deposit

#6

"Pre-Cambrian " Zn-Cu DepositKidd-Creek

"Pre-Cambrian " Zn-Cu DepositMattabi

0

10

20

30

kCounts

0

10

20

30

kCounts

0

10

20

30

kCounts

0

10

20

30

kCounts

file6103.ms

file6104.ms

file6124.ms

file6125.ms

"Modern " Zn-Cu Deposit#3

"Modern " Zn-Cu Deposit

#6

"Pre-Cambrian " Zn-Cu DepositKidd-Creek

"Pre-Cambrian " Zn-Cu DepositMattabi

Mattabi

Kidd-Creek

Black Smoker

Black Smoker

FORENSIC PATTERN RECOGNITION APPROACH

Suspect 1 has DNAmatching the sperm

residue foundon the victim.

Forensic DNAidentification isconsidered a

certainty basedon this pattern

recognition.

As a Forensic-typeof identification,

SGH provides highconfidence by using162 parameters forpattern recognition.

SGH has a differentsignature for VMS

(shown in red) thanthat of a kimberlite(shown in yellow).

Background

Cutting Edge Geochemistry Detects Organic Signatures in Surficial Samples Originating fromBacterial-Mineral Interactions to Locate and Identify Deeply Buried Exploration Targets

Ore or Kimberlite

Pockets of

bacterial

colonies

Accumulating vertical

movement around

outside of target

Bacterial

remnant

movements

Surface

SGH Halo

Samples

Sutherland – Nov-06

B-Horizon

SGH class

signature

x x x x xx x x xx x x x x x xx xxxxx x x x x x

REDUCTION

ZONEOXIDATION

ZONEOXIDATION

ZONE

x

REDOX Cell - SGH Response

SGH located and identifiedthe Kimberlite Pipe. It was

later revealed that there wasexcellent correlation to the

geophysical magnetic anomaly.

Kimberlite Case StudyShear Minerals

Raw Data Plot

WMC: Diana - Gold

Ore Body

LocationMineralizationDepositCover and ThicknessSample Spacing

: 30km southeast of Kambalda, Australia - hyperarid environment: paleochannel gold mineralization (1 Mt @ 2.5 g/t)

: consists of a series of stacked flat-lying structures host to the mineralization: consolidated dune sands with a poor developed B-horizon

: 25m over mineralization, 50m over background, 100m between sample lines

Kimberlite Case Study

Diadem has made theseSGH findings public

Kimberlite Pipe No. 105Parry Peninsula Kimberlite Field

Location of drill-confirmeddiamondiferous kimberlite

SGH signature predictskimberlite pipe under

Bright Lake, Manitoba

Lake bottom sedimentswere taken with an Eckman

dredge sampler from acanoe, depth

> 4 metres

Uranium Case Study

Definitive anomaly for Uranium deposit in NevadaPossible roll-front type uraniumExcellent correlation with Radon gas survey

Dale [email protected]

Dale [email protected]

Activation Laboratories Ltd.1336 Sandhill DriveAncaster, Ontario

L9G 4V5Phone: (905) 648-9611

Fax: (905) [email protected]

www.actlabs.com

Activation Laboratories Ltd.1336 Sandhill DriveAncaster, Ontario

L9G 4V5Phone: (905) 648-9611

Fax: (905) [email protected]

www.actlabs.com

With permission fromHarold Westdahl