current activities in water management research and ... · processes, and approaches to carbon...
TRANSCRIPT
National EnergyTechnology Laboratory
Susan M. MaleyTechnology Manager for Crosscutting ResearchU.S. Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory
Water Management for Fossil Energy Systems
Current Activities in Water Management Research and Development
NETL Mission: Advance energy options to fuel our economy, strengthen our security, and
improve our environment
DOE Mission: Ensure America’s security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental, and nuclear challenges
through transformative science and technology solutions
Department Of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory
Why and what we do...• Utilize domestic resources for
abundant, low cost power
• Design, develop, and demonstrate highly efficient and environmentally benign power and fuel systems.
• Perform and manage research, development, and demonstration projects in the areas of resource utilization, equipment for energy conversion, separation processes, and approaches to carbon capture & storage.
Overview• Water
– Essential, Ubiquitous, & Pervasive• Water, Food/Land, & Energy
are connected• Water Management for Fossil
Energy Based Systems
•Data and Information•Program Planning•Prioritization of Effort•Working Together
• Government• Industry•R&D Organizations
Water Withdrawals and Consumptive UseThermo-electric Power Large User of Water, Relatively Small Consumer
Irrigation134,000
Fossil FuelPlants97,500
Nuclear34,400
Fossil FuelPlants 2,500
Nuclear800
Withdrawals (Mgal/day) Consumptive Use (Mgal/day)
Source:“Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 1995,” USGS Circular 1200, 1998
Other15,400
Irrigation81,300
Other75,000
Sankey DiagramsUseful accounting for Water-Energy Efforts
• Develop State based Sankey Diagrams• Water Energy Nexus Team, NETL, and LLNL• Improve and update data/inputs• Address gaps in water and energy
6
Sankey Diagram: Contiguous U.S
Water Balances Associated with Deep Gas
7
Project SummaryState Level Assessment
Strategy• Initially focus on water usage for
Appalachian Basin unconventional shale gas/oil extraction
• Identify best sources of water supply and disposition data by state (OH, PA, WV)
• Gather data and develop rationale for quantifying data inputs required for Sankey diagrams by state
• Develop methodology for updating as new data becomes available
Objective• Develop Sankey diagrams to
illustrate water usage in shale gas/oil extraction by state
Water Balance for520 MW Bituminous Coal-Fired Power Plant
Reference: NETL Power Plant Water Usage and Loss Study, May 2007
3,804,950 lb/hr
Boiler Feedwater
Steam
Condensate
Warm Water
Cool Water Steam Condenser
Evaporation & Drift
Blowdown WaterMake-up Water5,188 gpm 1,297 gpm
25 ºF Rise
187,600 gpm
520 MW
3,891 gpm
7,645 gpm
Generator
Turbine
Cooling Tower
Boiler
Flue Gas Stack928 gpm
Sankey Diagram: Pulverized Coal Plant 500 MW
W/ Cooling Tower
90% Potential Increase in Withdrawal
with CO2 Capture
SOA Environmental ControlsWith No CO2 Capture
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
4519
6019
6219
6419
6619
6819
7019
7219
7419
7619
7819
8019
8219
8419
8619
8819
9019
9219
9419
9619
9820
0020
0220
0420
0620
0820
1020
1220
1420
1620
1820
2020
2220
2420
2620
2820
3020
3220
3420
3620
3820
40
Annu
al E
nerg
y O
utlo
ok 2
014e
r N
et S
umm
er C
apac
ity A
dditi
ons (
GW)
GasCoalNuclear
Projected Power Generation DeploymentsExample 1: Business as Usual Case - Based on AEO 2014 early release
Ventyx Velocity Suite, EIA AEO 2014 er
Is this 138 GW of new capacity in 27 years going to increase water problems?
Gas = gas fired combined cycle and steam units
ForecastHistoric
Does not take out retired units NGCC used ~ 1/3 less water per MW than coal and nuclear steam units
Current Water Demands Do Not Appear Sustainable in Many Parts of the U.S.
National Resources Defense Council: http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/watersustainability/
EIA’s AEO 2014 shows that the most water constrained areas, FL and TX will see significant population growth and power plant builds by 2040
State
Percent of Counties At-
Risk for Water Shortage
Value of Crops Produced in At-Risk Counties
($000s)
Florida 96% 4,803,297
Texas 98% 5,333,981
2040 Builds9GW NGCC,4GW Nuclear
2040 Builds15GW NGCC
Low Water Footprint TechnologiesDistributed Generation Fuel Cell Impacts on CO2 Emissions and Water Use
8.7
5.3
22.3
13.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
Texas Florida
milli
on to
nnes
CO2/y
r or b
illion
gal w
ater
/yr
CO2 Emission Reduction, milliontonnes/yr
Water Savings, billion gal/yr
Assumptions- GW NGCC additions from 2025-2040 replaced with SOFC DG- Reduction and savings are for year 2040 - 85% CF for NGCC and SOFC
If EIA’s 2040 projected NGCC builds were replaced with a more efficient DG SOFC system there could be significant water and CO2 savings in water constrained areas.
Changes in Capacity Imply Changes in Water UseLife Cycle Water Use for Power Generation
22,785 22,785 7,595 7,595 46,188
-22,774 -22,774 -7,591 -7,591 -46,188
10-55 -31 5
21
425 494
898
360440
823
118191
380
144213
406
648
-34 2
-2,000
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Fleet Coal Fleet Coal Fleet NG Fleet NG Existing Fleet Coal SCPC SCPCCCS
Fleet Coal SCPC SCPCCCS
Fleet NG NGCC NGCCCCS
Fleet NG NGCC NGCCCCS
Existing GTSC GTSC
SurfaceCoal
Under-ground
Coal
Conv NG
UnconvNG
Nuclear SurfaceCoal
UndergroundCoal
Conv NG Unconv NG Nuclear Conv NG UnconvNG
Once Through Cooling Tower No Water Cooling
Wat
er U
se (g
al/M
Wh)
Withdrawal RMA Discharge RMA Withdrawal ECF Discharge ECF Net Consumption
Once-through cooling generally requires higher water withdrawal than
cooling towers, but results in lower water consumption
• Collaboration with Sandia National Laboratory– Build from prior work at SNL on water for
water states– Eastern states data will be merged with
existing western states data into aggregate database including detailed supporting metadata
• Develop a Water Altas– Build from data collection and estimation
efforts– Build tools/model to support analysis,
planning, and prioritization• Collaborate with Other DOE Offices and
Agencies• ARPA-e, USGS, USDA, Other
Improving Data and ModelsAppropriated Water
Unappropriated Groundwater
NETL’s History in Water Management
Clean,Affordable
Water
• Sponsored workshops focused on power plants and water with SNL
• Long-standing R&D programs in water related to coal, oil & natural gas development and use
• NETL has sponsored over 60 projects focused on water in both the coal and oil & gas programs since 2000
• R&D has included:– Thermoelectric water use/management– Systems, trends, and life-cycle analyses– Advanced treatment/detection technology– Produced water treatment and reuse– Unconventional oil and shale gas-water
interface– Geological carbon storage
NETL’s 2003 Electric Utility & Water Workshop
Thank YouQuestions
Office of Fossil Energywww.fe.doe.gov
NETLwww.netl.doe.gov
@NETL_News
Susan M. Maley304-285-1321
National Energy Technology Laboratory
Water Reuse and Recovery• ~81% power plants have municipal
wastewater available within 10 miles• Advanced treatment necessary, costs
$0.91 - $1.32 (in 2009$/kgal) vs. $0.74 for river withdrawal and the city water costs of $2.95 (in 2009$/kgal)
• Economics and availability make this water source second to river withdrawal and widely used
~81% power plants have municipal wastewater available within 10 miles
Advanced treatment necessary, costs $0.91 - $1.32 (in 2009$/kgal) vs. $0.74 for river withdrawal and the city water costs of $2.95 (in 2009$/kgal)
Economics and availability make this water source second to river withdrawal and widely used
Pilot-scale cooling towersUse of Treated Municipal Wastewater as Power PlantCooling System Makeup Water Carnegie Mellon University
Advanced Cooling Technology
Condensing Heat Exchangers
Steam
ColdWater
ColdWaterCold,
Strong,Desiccant
Cold,Weak
Desiccant
Hot, WeakDesiccant
Hot,Strong,
Desiccant
WaterVapor
RecoveredWater
Cold, WeakDesiccant
HeatExchanger
HeatExchanger
HeatExchanger
FlashDrum
AbsorberTower
Condensing Heat
Exchangers
Absorption with a Desiccant
EERC/GEA hybrid cooling