cultural heritage in regional networks regnet trial service and recommendations – d11
TRANSCRIPT
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworksCultural Heritage in REGional NETworks
REGNETREGNETTrial Service and
Recommendations – D11
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
2
Methodology(1/3)Methodology(1/3)
Usability Testing2 validation phases
Different document types
Technical Response CycleResponses to validation phase 1
Bi-directional way of communication
Behavioural ObservationsValuable input for SWOT
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
3Methodology (2/3)Methodology (2/3)
Results collection
Demonstration & Marketing
Reference & methodology
CSC Strategy
Content-techn. generation
Feedback
Reporting & documentation
Course and scheduling
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
4
Methodology(3/3)Methodology(3/3)
Focus on
General appearance
Overall Performance – Functionalities
Metrics
SWOT analysis
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
5
General AppearanceGeneral Appearance
Portal
17%
67%
17%
Data Entry
8%
33%
58%
E-Procurement
14%
14%
29%
43%
E-Shop
13%
25%
50%
13%
Auction
33%
50%
17%
Reference: validation phase 1
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
6
PerformancePerformance
Portal
17%
17%
33%
33%
Data Entry
10%10%
50%
20%
10%
E-Procurement
25%
50%
25%
E-Shop
33%
17%
50%
Auction
40%
20%
40%
Reference: validation phase 1
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
7
Web Statistics(1/2)Web Statistics(1/2)
NOVEMBER
FEBRUARY
+300%+230%
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
8
Web Statistics (2/2)Web Statistics (2/2)
Content ProvidersData Bases
Reference:February 2003
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
9
SWOT Analysis- (SW 1/2)SWOT Analysis- (SW 1/2)
Reference: week 8 2003
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
10
SWOT Analysis- (SW 2/2)SWOT Analysis- (SW 2/2)
Innovation (8.33)Internationalisation /Regionalisation (7.83)Benefits/Costs(7.67)Functionality (7.34)User friendliness (5.33)Reliability (5.33)User support (4.67)
Reference: week 8 2003
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
11
SWOT Analysis - (OT 1/2)SWOT Analysis - (OT 1/2)
Reference: week 8 2003
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
12
SWOT Analysis- (OT 2/2)SWOT Analysis- (OT 2/2)
Boosting small & medium CH institutions (8.33)Cult. tourism, visits (7.67)Spending on cultural items (7.33)
Increasing Internet Usage (7.00)Wireless Technologies (WAP, PDA…)(6.67)Investment in Pieces of Art (6.00)The “haves” and the “have-nots” (4.00)
Following all the opportunities (3.67)
Trust in Internet payment procedures (2.33)
Competitors (2.33)
Reference: week 8 2003
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
13
REGNET-Conclusions (1/2)REGNET-Conclusions (1/2)
1. The whole REGNET system and approach proved to be very valid and usable in the CH domain.
2. All basic issues and structures for a full internationalisation level are realised.
3. The System contains solutions covering a broad range of functionalities needed in a CH environment. The market potential of the individual modules varies.
4. The REGNET platform provides integration capabilities for the individual modules. Further streamlining possible.
5. User Support is addressed.
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
14
REGNET-Conclusions (2/2)REGNET-Conclusions (2/2)
6. A lot of innovations are included.
7. Tools are competitive, especially when combined with others. Awareness of niche market players is necessary.
8. REGNET shows evidence to address the CH domain. A more distinctive character is envisaged.
9. Cultural Heritage Institutions will benefit of lower total cost of ownership (TCO) through the Cultural Service Centres (CSC)
10. Increased spending on Cultural offers and goods will boost the business opportunities for CSCs and its members.
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
15
REGNET- Recommendations (1/2)REGNET- Recommendations (1/2)
1. Continue establishing the CSC concept
2. Continue the use of Open Source Technologies
3. Promote the “brand” as much as possible
4. Go for cross-disciplinary partnerships
5. Explore new opportunities (a.o. knowledge engineering)
27 March 2003 REGNET Final Project Review
16REGNET- Recommendations REGNET- Recommendations (2/2)(2/2)
6. Have a close watch on interoperability issues.
7. Focus on further development of the modules.
8. Take care of the usability/support aspects of the tools
9. Prioritarise tool offerings
10. Make different business scenarios