cssar

42
1 CSSAR Center for Space science and Applied Research Chinese academy of Sciences FAC in magnetotail observed by Clust er J. K. Shi (1), Z. W. Cheng (1), T. L. Zhang (2), M. Dunlop (3), Z. X. Liu (1) A. Fazakerley (4), E. Lucek (5), H. R´eme (6), M. Taylor(7), I. Dandouras (6) (1) CSSAR / CAS, China (2) Space Research Institute, AAS, Austria (3) SSTD, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK. (4) MSSL, UCL, UK (5) Imperial College London, UK (6) Univ. of Toulouse, UPS, CESR, and CNRS, France (7) ESTEC/ESA, The Netherlands

Upload: vala

Post on 04-Jan-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

CSSAR. Center for Space science and Applied Research Chinese academy of Sciences. FAC in m agnetotail observed by Cluster J. K. Shi (1), Z. W. Cheng (1), T. L. Zhang (2), M. Dunlop (3), Z. X. Liu (1) A. Fazakerley (4), E. Lucek (5), H. R´eme (6), M. Taylor(7), I. Dandouras (6) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CSSAR

1

CSSAR Center for Space science and Applied ResearchChinese academy of Sciences

FAC in magnetotail observed by Cluster

J. K. Shi (1), Z. W. Cheng (1), T. L. Zhang (2), M. Dunlop (3), Z. X. Liu (1)

A. Fazakerley (4), E. Lucek (5), H. R´eme (6), M. Taylor(7), I. Dandouras (6)

(1) CSSAR / CAS, China

(2) Space Research Institute, AAS, Austria

(3) SSTD, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK.

(4) MSSL, UCL, UK

(5) Imperial College London, UK

(6) Univ. of Toulouse, UPS, CESR, and CNRS, France

(7) ESTEC/ESA, The Netherlands

19th Cluster Workshop, Romania, May, 2010

Page 2: CSSAR

2

Outline

1. Introduction

2. Principle and Method

3. FAC properties

3.1 FAC’s asymmetry

3.2 FAC’s distribution function

3.3 Relationship between FAC and

geo-magnetic activity

3.4 FAC in storm times

4. Summary

Page 3: CSSAR

3

1. Introduction

M-I Coupling is important to understand dynamics in the Geo-

space. It concerns:

• Up-flowing ions

• Precipitation particles

• FAC

• Field aligned electric

field

• Wave and instability,

and so on

Page 4: CSSAR

4

FACs flowing between magnetosphere and ionosphere

A Sketch map of the FACs going into polar region and out from polar region

FACs flow Into and out of the ionosphere

Page 5: CSSAR

5

Cluster 4-ponit measurement have an advantage to provide data for the study of FACs

ClusterTC-2

Page 6: CSSAR

6

• Before Cluster, the authors used By from one or two satellite to estimate the FAC. It may ambiguous because time and space variations can not be fully distinguished.

• With Cluster 4-point magnetic measurement, the "Curlometer Technique" was propsed to calculate the current

--- Vallat et.al. [2005] studied the current density in the ring current region.

--- Draper et. al. [2005] studied FACs in the PSBL associated with periods of reconnection.

--- Snekvik et. al. [2007] studied FAC at the dawn flank of a burst bulk flow in the outer central plasma sheet --- Forsyth et. al. [2008] determined that the current density of the FACs in a substorm is about 5 nAkm−2.

Page 7: CSSAR

7

In this study, we use magnetic field data from the Cluster 4-point

measurement to study FACs in Plasma Sheet Boundary Layer

(PSBL)

To research FACs with Cluster data in the

PSBL

Lobe

PlasmaSheet

Lobe

• The data from 4 satellites

• The data were obtained in 2001

Page 8: CSSAR

8

2. Principle and Method

Page 9: CSSAR

9

The current was calculated with the so called “Curlometer Technique” with the 4-point data through Ampere’s law:

The tetrahedron consisted by the four-spacecraft Cluster mission

BBQ

In integral form:

B

BJJ

||

Using the 4-point data :

The FACs:

The data quality:

and we take Q< 0.3

BJ

0

A C

dlBdsJ

0

),,( 0

4

1zyx JJJ

BJBkB

)(

rrr

rrk

BkB

4

1

Page 10: CSSAR

10

4 second data to be used to calculated the FAC in the PSBLs

Page 11: CSSAR

11

FAC cases selection:

and time separation > 10 minuteskmpTj /3||

Fig. 1b, FAC cases selected according to Bxy, FAC density and interval. All cases A, B, C, and D lie in the PSBLs because Bxy > 15 nT, but the case C should not be selected because the current density is less than 3 pT / km and the interval of the case C and D is less than 10 minutes.

Bxy > 15 nT

Page 12: CSSAR

12

Jx

B

y

B

x

Earthward and Tailward FACs

Page 13: CSSAR

13

Fig. 2 FAC distribution on the Bx–By plane (left panel) that shows the FAC cases were only selected in the plasmasheet boundary layers, and the calculated FAC density distribution for all the cases (right panel) that shows FAC have a larger range of density values in the north hemisphere

There are 172 FAC cases selected for this study:

Page 14: CSSAR

14

3. FAC properties

3.1 FAC’s asymmetry

Page 15: CSSAR

15

Projection of FACs in X-Y plane

• Red: Earthward, Blue: Tailward

• Arrow Length: Density

Fig.3 FAC cases on the X-Y plane in the GSM system. It shows the FACs’s:• Dawn-Dusk asymmetry• Earthward –tailward asymmetry.

Page 16: CSSAR

16

(a) (b)Fig. 4 FAC distribution versus YGSM, gray and black colour mark the Earthward and tailward FACs respectively, (a) for the FAC cases number distribution and, (b) for the FAC fractional occurrence.

Dawn-Dusk asymmetry, Tailward-Earthward asymmetryShi et. al., 2006, 2009

Page 17: CSSAR

17

• The positions of FACs in magnetotail are likely to connect both to the

inner R1 current system and to currents at the poleward boundary.

• It is also possible that, in tail reconnection, a NENL may be either

Earthward or tailward of the Cluster location.

• In order to consider the R1 current system more directly, we use Bz to

filter out any reconnection driven currents, which arise from a NENL

located Earthward of the spacecraft.

• Bz > 0, field lines connecting to the Earth. Bz<0, not.

• 146 cases whose with condition Bz>0 were selected for the analysis.

Page 18: CSSAR

18

North-South asymmetryShi et.al.,JGR, 2010

Page 19: CSSAR

19

Page 20: CSSAR

20

Fig. 6a The footprints of the mapping of the FACs along the field line to the polar region. The left panel is for the northern hemisphere and the right panel is for the south hemisphere, respectively. The FAC cases in this figure exclude those with the condition Bz<0.

Page 21: CSSAR

21

Fig.6b FAC footprint distribution versus latitude in the two hemispheres corresponding to Fig 6a, The left panel is for the northern hemisphere and the right panel is for the southern hemisphere, respectively. The FAC cases in this figure, of course, exclude those with the condition Bz<0.

Page 22: CSSAR

22

3.2 FAC’s distribution function

Page 23: CSSAR

23

Page 24: CSSAR

24

Page 25: CSSAR

25

2

1

0.0289exp[ (( 3.747) /1.89) ] ( 5.3, 2.4)( )

0 ( )

JF J

others

2

0.1408exp(0.4208 ) ( 10, 5.3)( )

0 ( )

JF J

others

FT(J) = F1(J) + F2(J) (Cheng and Shi et.al., 2008)

(4)

Page 26: CSSAR

26

2

3

0.03334exp[ (( 3.38) /1.712) ] (2.1,4.9)( )

0 ( )

JF J

others

4

0.2585exp( 0.5798 ) (4.9, 10)( )

0 ( )

JF J

others

FT(J) = F3(J) + F4(J) (Cheng and Shi et.al., 2008)

Page 27: CSSAR

27

FACs occurance also appeared two peaks at PSBL on Aug.17, 2001

  

Peaks: Tailward, -7pT/km; Earthward, 12pT/km

Page 28: CSSAR

28

3.3 Relationship between FAC and geo-magnetic

activity

Page 29: CSSAR

29

Fig.2. Normalized frequency of FACs cases as a function hourly geomagnetic activity level (They were defined by Kp). The number of cases in each geomagnetic activity level bin, which is indicate above the bar, is normalized by total hours when Kp was in each geomagnetic activity level during the period of crossing.

Page 30: CSSAR

30

Fig.3. The FACs density as a function of Kp. The curve shows the FACs average density variation.

Page 31: CSSAR

31

Fig.4. The density of field-aligned currents as a function of AE index.

Page 32: CSSAR

32

3.4 FAC in storm time

Page 33: CSSAR

33

► Only two cases were found for this research

(Cheng and Shi et.al., 2007)

* Case 1: on Aug. 17, 2001

Sudden storm commencement to main phase

* Case 2: on Oct.1, 2001

Main phase and recovery phase

► In the each case, Cluster just crosses the plasma sheet which is

with two sheet-lobe boundary lays.

► FAC sample selection

kmpTj /3||

Separation is more than 5 min.

Page 34: CSSAR

34

 

(1) The storm starting on August 17, 2001 

Gray area, 0745-1815, Cluster crossing

Page 35: CSSAR

35

AugAug..17, 200117, 2001 (( sudden commencement and main phase)

FACs versus AE ( including Earthward and Tailward)

Page 36: CSSAR

36

Earthward FACs versus AE AugAug..17, 200117, 2001 (( sudden commencement and main phase)

Page 37: CSSAR

37

Tailward FACs versus versus AE

AugAug..17, 200117, 2001 (( sudden commencement and main phase)

Page 38: CSSAR

38

(2) The storm starting on Oct. 1, 2001

Gray area, 0700-2400, Cluster crossing

Page 39: CSSAR

39

Oct. 1Oct. 1, 2001, 2001(( later later main phase and recovery phase)FACs versus AE ( including Earthward and Tailward)

Page 40: CSSAR

40

It seems as in the storm time,

• In SC, FAC havs an inversed variation with AE

• In the main phase, FAC has same variation with AE

• In the recovery phase, FAC has no relation with AE

This is only from two csaes and need to be further studied.

Page 41: CSSAR

41

SummaryThe FACs in PSBL was studied by analyzing the data from Cluster 4-point measurement in 2001. The results are:

►FACs not only have earth-tailward asymmetry, dawn-dusk assymmetry, but also north-south hemisphere asymmetry

► FACs distribution function consits of a Gauss distribution and a exponent distribution.

► No storm time, FACs variation is consistant with Kp not AE.

►In storm time: in SC, FACs inversed to AE, in main phase, FACs' variation is consitant with AE in recovery phase, FAC's has nothing to do with AE

Page 42: CSSAR

42

CSSAR Center for Space science and Applied ResearchChinese academy of Sciences