cso report

Upload: adieyal

Post on 08-Apr-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    1/39

    Southern Arican Regional Programme

    on Access to Medicines and Diagnostics

    CIVIL SOCIETY MEETING REPORT

    How can we work in partnership to improe access

    to Medicines & Diagnostics in Sothern Arica?

    21 22 March 2010, Nairobi, Kenya

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    2/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    2TABLE OF CONTENTS

    RECORD OF THE CONSuLTATION

    1. Establishing a common agenda to improve access in Southern Arica 3

    2. Objectives o the consultation 3

    3. Who was there 3

    4. The meeting proceedings 4

    5. Record o small group discussions & recommendations 4

    6. Dening potential Partnerships or Action PACTs 5

    7. Key points o consensus 6

    8. Actions or the next steps 6

    9. Conclusions 6

    ANNEXES

    A. Overview o SARPAM 7

    B. SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan 2007 2013: Summary 9

    C. Participants List 10

    D. Record o Open Agenda Discussions 11

    E. First Drat CSLed Partnership or Action PACT Framework 23

    F. The SARPAM Civil Society Reerence Group 25

    G. Maniesto For Civil Society Action on Access to Medicines in southern Arica 26

    H. Case Study: Partnership In Action 28

    I. Workshop Evaluation 38

    SARPAM Contact details

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    3/39

    SARPAMCSMEETINGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforA

    ctiononAccesstoMedicines&DiagnosticsinSouthernAfrica

    3RECORD OF THE CONSuLTATION

    Through initial emailbased discussions, regional

    and national CS representaties shared ideas on

    how the cold potentiall contribte towards

    improing access to medicines throgh more

    intensie ocs on the sothern Arica region.

    The subsequent consultation was called at short

    notice to take advantage o the act that a number

    o key Civil Society representatives would be

    in Nairobi or other meetings. This oered an

    opportunity or these individuals to engage in an

    intensive process to:

    MapouttheagendaforCivilSocietytoimprove

    access to medicines and diagnostics in southern

    Arica;

    Learn about SARPAM and the possible

    contributions it could make to the Access

    agenda;

    Interact with other CSOs working directly or

    indirectly on pharmaceutical and treatment

    access issues within the SADC region;

    DeneaCivil-SocietyledPartnershipforAction

    PACT in which each organizations potential

    contributions are mapped out;

    Engagewithaprocessforassessingthesupport

    that each organization needs to make their

    contributions as partners in the PACT;

    Learn a methodology for developing further

    Partnerships or Action.

    1. ESTABLISHING A COMMON AGENDA TO IMPROvE ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN SOuTHERN AFRICA

    3. WHO WAS THERE

    2. OBjECTIvES OF THE CONSuLTATION

    The Southern Arican Regional Programme on

    Access to Medicines & Diagnostics SARPAM is

    being designed through a process o consultation

    and inormationgathering during an inception

    phase that started in January 2010. During the

    period, Partnerships or Action PACTs are

    being explored to improe the aailabilit,

    aordabilit and qalit o essential medicines

    and diagnostics across the SADC region. These

    PACTs should support implementation o the SADC

    Pharmaceutical Business Plan to the end o 2013.

    SARPAM oers the potential to strengthen thecapacity o regional institutions and civil society

    to implement joint plans that will achieve agreed

    results through multistakeholder action across

    countries in the region.

    The Responsible Action Consortium managing

    SARPAM on behal o the U.K. Department

    or International Development acilitated this

    consultation or Civil Society in March 2010.

    The meeting started with an open agenda or

    participants to dene their own priorities to address

    the challenge: How can we work in partnership to

    improve access to medicines and diagnostics in the

    Southern Arica region?.

    Over 2 days, participants started the process o

    engaging with each other as Arican Civil Society

    to initiate a regionally ocused Civil Society Action

    Networkthat will ocus on what Civil Society in the

    SADC region can do to support implementation o

    the SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan.

    Strong commitments to action were made by those

    present to lead a Partnership or Action PACT

    that will promote greater transparency in the

    regional pharmaceutical marketplace and more

    eective sharing and use o pharmaceutical market

    inormation.

    A Reerence Group o Civil Society ocal persons

    was constituted to take this process urther with the

    SARPAM programme management team.

    The 25 participants Annex C represented a good crosssection o regional Civil Society Organizations CSO

    and Faith Based Organizations FBO working on dierent Access issues, including: advocacy and campaigns;

    legal and trade; research; service delivery; proessional standards and research.

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    4/39

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    5/39

    SARPAMCSMEETINGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforA

    ctiononAccesstoMedicines&DiagnosticsinSouthernAfrica

    5

    7. Qalit o Medicines

    Supportforregionalstandardsandaccredited

    quality control acilities.

    InvolvementofCS in pharmacovigilanceand

    raising prole o quality issues.

    8. Priate Sector Engagement

    CS platform can open debates on positive

    engagement o the private sector including

    participation in PACTs and other stakeholder

    opportunities e.g. MeTA

    CS advocate for increased Corporate Social

    Responsibility CSR at country levels

    9. Commnit Inolement

    Studyandidentifybestwaystoworkwithand

    support true community representation in the

    dierent countries Link with and build capacity of Community

    Based Organizations CBOs.

    Advocate for sustainable nancing of

    programmes that support communities e.g.

    the WHO community care giver plan

    10. Good Goernance

    Promotedrugsupplysystemsthatarerobustand transparent and have measurable

    indicators.

    CSOs can act as critical watchdogs and

    lobbyists.

    11. Hman Rights and Access to Medicines

    CSOscancarryoutevidence-basedadvocacy

    CSbestrategicinaligningtheircompetencies

    or maximum impact, including building

    capacity or operational research.

    On the second day, participants discussed possible

    intervention areas in which CSOs/FBOs could take

    more eective joint action with an intensied ocus

    on southern Arica. They made the case or a range

    o proposals or joint action through the PACT

    mechanism, including to:

    Establish a mechanism that will support pooled

    and bulk procurement initiatives or essential

    medicines. This would require: engagement o the

    SADC Secretariat to recognize the role o FBOs

    e.g. in service delivery; analysis o the reasons or

    failuresofcrossborderbulk/pooledprocurement

    attempts; and inclusion o FBOs in discussions on

    a SADC pooled procurement market survey.

    Strengthen the capacity o CSO/FBOs working

    on access in the region to eectively support

    implementation o SARPAM. Action areas

    proposed could include: increasing capacity

    of CSO/FBOs to handle medicines and access

    issues; providing oversight through proessional

    pharmacy networks/associations; harmonizing

    the CS actions; targeting the maximization o the

    utilization o the current TRIPS exibility to 2016

    as provided or in WTO agreement.

    Establish a collaboration platorm between SADC

    and regional CSO/FBOs. Action areas proposed

    could include: promotion o transparency and

    accountability by applying the MeTA principles;

    supporting at least 3 SADC countries to join MeTA

    by 2011; and the reestablishment o the SADC

    Pharmaceutical Task Force in which CSO are

    members.

    Establish a system or CS to continuously evaluate

    Pharmaceutical Supply Management. Actions areas

    could include: monitoring the supply chain as

    well as the prices and availability o medicines at

    acility level.

    Advocate or development, harmonization and

    implementation o treatment and diagnostic

    guidelines in Southern Arica.

    This process prodced consenss that the most

    sel immediate PACT that Ciil Societ shold

    lead is to promote greater transparenc in the

    regional pharmacetical marketplace and more

    eectie sharing and se o market inormation.

    Initial mapping o the PACT Framework or this

    identied the highest priority results that could be

    jointly pursued, the range o partners that could work

    together and some initial ideas o what each partner

    organization might be able to specically contribute

    towards achieving these results. This drat ramework

    ollows in Annex E.

    The group agreed that this ramework or the PACT

    would need to be worked up urther and the SARPAM

    programme management team was charged to

    complete this task in collaboration with a Civil Society

    Reerence Group see section 6 below.

    6. DEFINING POTENTIAL PARTNERSHIPS FOR ACTION (PACTS)

    RECORD OF THE CONSuLTATION continued

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    6/39

    SARPAMCSMEETINGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforA

    ctiononAccesstoMedicines&DiagnosticsinSouthernAfrica

    6

    Having the means to gather and disseminate

    inormation, hold discussions and share documents

    was considered a key requirement or successully

    implementing this PACT. Participants agreed to use

    o the Civil Society Action Network newsgroup and

    online collaboration site in the SARPAM InoHub.

    Use o short message service SMS was discussed as

    a possible way o keeping everyone in the network

    updated.

    Participants agreed to:

    1. Establish a regional Civil Society Reerence

    Group, to which the ollowing individuals were

    nomintated: Gichinga Ndirangu HAI; Donna

    Kusemererwa EPN; Tapiwanashe Kujinga

    PATAM; Franco Wandabwa ANECCA; and

    Tasangana Matika (Seatini/Equinet). Terms

    o Reerence or the group were discussed

    immediately ater the meeting and adopted by

    the Reerence Group members see Annex F.

    2. All CS and aithbased organizations committed

    to working through SARPAM should sign up to

    a Maniesto or Civil Society Action on Access to

    Medicines, based on principles o engagement that

    were developed by a subgroup o participants

    see Annex G.

    3. Send 2 CS representatives Franco Wandabwa

    and Cryson Miyoba to attend the Pharmaceutical

    Market Analysis Study Readiness Retreat in Cape

    Town.

    7. KEy POINTS OF CONSENSuS

    1. Complete the drating o a maniesto

    responsibility o the SARPAM secretariat CS

    Technical Lead and CS Coordinator that,ollowing consultation with the Reerence Group,

    should be sent to all meeting participants to

    present this to their organizations or signature.

    2. Preliminary report o the consultation to be sent

    to participants within a week o the meeting.

    3. CS Technical Lead to communicate with the

    participants and other CS who could not attend

    the meeting on the next steps to take orward the

    PACT.

    4. CS Reerence Group to consider and recommend

    how best to gather and disseminate inormation

    between the CS, including pilot testing the SMS

    methodology.

    5. The SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan and

    SARPAMs one page summary to be sent to

    all meeting participants by email SARPAMSecretariat.

    6. The PACT methodology to be written up and sent

    to all participants or use in their own meetings.

    7. SARPAM Secretariat, in collaboration with the

    Reerence Group, to complete the development

    o the agreed PACT.

    8. Assessments o what each Civil Society

    organizations capacity needs are to eectively

    contribute to the PACT will be carried out by the

    SARPAM Secretariat. This will result in Enabling

    Plans and resource requirements being scoped

    out and presented to DFID or Implementation

    Phase unding to be incorporated into the

    SARPAM Inception Report.

    8. ACTIONS FOR THE NEXT STEPS

    The objectives o the consultation were achieved. However, as not all regional CS representatives were able

    to attend, it will be important to share the report and to continue the conversations that were started. The

    enthusiasm needs to be kept through regular communication and interactions, led by the SARPAM Civil

    Society Lead Eva Ombaka, supported by a Civil Society Coordinator and in collaboration with the Civil Society

    Reerence Group.

    9. CONCLuSION

    RECORD OF THE CONSuLTATION continued

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    7/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    7ANNEX A | OVERVIEW OF SARPAM

    The Southern Arica Regional Programme on Access to Medicines and Diagnostics SARPAM launched in January

    2010. SARPAM is ounded on the belie that eective collective action and innovation will improve Access to

    Medicines across the regional economic community. Working with member state governments, civil society,

    regional institutions, international agencies, research networks and the private sector, SARPAM will support the

    good work being done through existing partnerships and initiatives, as well as identiy new Partnerships or Action

    that will achieve ambitious results.

    The programme oers new resources in the orm o targeted unding, technical assistance, partnership building

    and networking opportunities. As the primary sponsor o this new initiative, the UK Government hopes that

    SARPAM will develop into a platorm or collaboration and partnership that will attract a broad support base over

    the next 45 years. This will create signicant opportunities to substantially improve the marketplace or good

    quality essential medicines.

    SARPAM oers to support and strengthen the capacity o regional institutions to implement plans that will benet

    rom multicountry action. The SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan endorsed by regional Ministers o Health

    in 2007 is the leading example o this. Civil Society Organizations within the region will be supported to lead

    Partnerships or Action that have the potential to positively inuence the pharmaceutical market, including the

    demand or medicines and their rational use.

    A regional InoHub will be established to make transparent pharmaceutical market intelligence and evidence

    or policy accessible to all stakeholders in the region. SARPAM will be undertaking an intensive Pharmaceutical

    Sector Market Analysis during the rst 9 months o 2010 to provide a baseline data set. A regional Evidence or

    Action Network will be supported as part o the Global Access to Medicines Research Network to set the agenda

    or research and to make research ndings available as global public goods.

    The Responsible Action Consortium, led by Re-Action! (Southern Arica) has been contracted by DFID to manage

    implementation o SARPAM. This includes establishing a network o development proessionals to work with the UK

    government southern Arica regional team so that priorities on Access to Medicines within SADC can be more eectively

    responded to and local capacity can be built.

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    8/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    8ANNEX B | SADC PHARMACEUTICAL BUSINESS PLAN 2007 - 2013: SUMMARY4

    The Southern Arican Development Community SADC was ormally launched

    on 17th August 2002 under a Treaty, and consists o 14 Member States with an

    estimated total population o 200 million people. In its programmes and operations,

    SADC is guided by a clear mission statement, which is To promote sustainable and

    equitable economic growth and socioeconomic development through efcient

    productive systems, deeper cooperation and integration, good governance,

    and durable peace and security, so that the region emerges as a competitive and

    eective player in international relations and the world economy.

    SADC has identied the need to develop and implement a Pharmaceutical Programme in line with the SADC

    Health Protocol and the SADC Health Policy. The purpose o the programme is to enhance the capacities o

    Member States to eectively prevent and treat diseases that are o major concern to public health in the Region.The Programme mainly addresses issues that concern access to quality medicines in all Member States. The SADC

    Pharmaceutical Business Plan has been developed within the context o global, continental and regional policy

    rameworks, protocols and commitments. Based on a SWOT analysis, the Plan identies priority areas, objectives

    and major activities that will be implemented both at regional and national levels to improve access to quality and

    aordable essential medicines including Arican Traditional Medicines.

    The overall goal o the SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan is to ensure availability o essential medicines including

    Arican Traditional Medicines to reduce disease burden in the region. Its main objective is to improve sustainable

    availability and access to aordable, quality, sae, efcacious essential medicines including Arican Traditional

    Medicines. In order to achieve the overall goal and the main objective, the ollowing strategies will be pursued:

    i Harmonizing standard treatment guidelines and essential medicine lists;

    ii Rationalizing and maximizing the research and production capacity o local and regional pharmaceutical

    industry o generic essential medicines and Arican Traditional Medicines;

    iii Strengthening regulatory capacity, supply and distribution o basic pharmaceutical products through

    ensuring a ully unctional regulatory authority with an adequate enorcement inrastructure;

    iv Promoting joint procurement o therapeutically benecial medicines o acceptable saety, proven efcacy

    and quality to the people who need them most at aordable prices;

    v Establishing a regional databank o traditional medicine, medicinal plants and procedures in order to

    ensure their protection in accordance with regimes and related intellectual property rights governing

    genetic resources, plant varieties and biotechnology;

    vi Developing and retaining competent human resources or the pharmaceutical programme;

    vii Developing mechanisms to respond to emergency pharmaceutical needs o the region; and

    viii Facilitate the trade in pharmaceuticals within SADC.

    In line with the SADC Protocol on Health, the Implementation Plan or the Protocol and the SADC Health Policy

    Framework, the SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan will be coordinated and implemented through the approved

    SADC structure. The Business Plan has spelt out clear roles and responsibilities o all stakeholders that will

    4. Adapted rom SADC PHARMACEUTICAL BUSINESS PLAN, SADC SECRETARIAT, 27 JUNE 2007, p. 35.

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    9/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    9ANNEX B | SADC PHARMACEUTICAL BUSINESS PLAN 2007 - 2013: SUMMARY

    be involved in the implementation process. At the political level, the implementation o the Plan will be

    monitored through the established institutional ramework.

    The implementation o the Plan will require substantial resources including human, material and nancial rom

    dierent sources. The Plan is estimated to cost US$16 million. To ensure ownership and sustainability, Member

    States will be required to budget or implementation o some o the interventions that need ongoing nancial

    support. The SADC Secretariat will make all eorts to mobilize resources rom key stakeholders including

    International Cooperating Partners.

    A monitoring and evaluation ramework has been included in order to review activities during implementation

    process. The Secretariat will acilitate capacity building on monitoring and evaluation. Appropriate technical

    and nancial reports will be produced during and ater implementation o program specic activities outlined

    in the Pharmaceutical Business Plan.

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    10/39

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    11/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    11ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS

    TOPIC

    Ciil Societ Capacit bilding

    PARTICIPANTS

    Donna, Tapiwanashe, Aarti, Christa, Mike, Cryson

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    NeedinformationonSARPAMhowdoesSARPAMsupportcapacity?

    DiscussiononSARPAMsowecanbuyintothebiggerpicture

    Betterunderstandingofcapacity

    Linkages between organizations e.g. management systems (JSI), sharing information lessons, even

    opportunities or capacity building

    Addressallissues:governance,infrastructure

    CSrequirescapacitybuildingbutalsohascapacitytobuildinotherorganizationsincludinggoods

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Consider internal opportunities

    2. Involve CS in capacity building initiatives within the region as the actual implementers

    3. CS needs inormation on SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan PBP

    4. Review maniestos vis a vis denition o Civil Society ensure capture dierent groups

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    12/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    12ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS (continued

    TOPIC

    Commnit inolement in Access to Medicines

    PARTICIPANTS

    Redemptor, Mike, Aarti, Eva, Cryson, Nalishebo, Franco, Phillip, Donna

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    (DRC)organizethroughsocialinsurancesomemoney,makecontractswithhealthcentresandhospitals

    get treatment or a year

    Twoevaluations(June/December)communitiesareinvolved

    Communityparticipationis throughchiefs.Oneissuebroughtto theattentionisthatmedicineswere

    not ree. Issue is with representation through chies is like the government not true representation

    o community e.g. in DRC the Chie is civil servant. In Zambia, the Chie is part o the community, has

    headman who is responsible or smaller communities thereore true representation chie is community

    thereore is representative o CS

    Useofpublicforumsindierentcountriese.g.inKenyalocalCBOsusedtomobilizecommunitiesfor

    stockout campaign managed to get inormation rom the ground.

    CBOsneedassistancefortransportandastipendforlunch

    Traditionalhealersarealsoimportantwithregardtoruralsettings(SA).Sickpeoplegothererst.

    Communitycaregivers criticalformonitoringstockouts,toidentifypatientsinthehomeprovide

    basic services these are volunteers

    District/CommunityCliniccommitteeslinkcommunitytoformalhealthcaresystemsplayacritical

    role in some settings Political orces aect those that are made strong ater capacity building

    Useofcaregiversisdependentonthespecicpriorityofcountries.Needtobecarefule.g.SAcreateda

    monsterrecruit caregivers NGOs provide better package than government unhelpul competition

    thereore government and the NGO world need to agree

    FBOsaspartofcommunity

    Community caregiverprogramme isreceived/ recognizeddierently indierentcountries issueis

    controversial.SchemeworkedwellinWHO/UNsupportedareasalsoworkswellinspecicprogrammes

    which are supported by outside agencies.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Need to understand relationships or community mobilization in specic situations

    2. CBOs are a major ally build their capacity

    3. Provide capacity support to traditional healers regarding HIV symptoms, reerral systems get their

    integration create a platorm or engaging traditional healers. Look at linkages with CBO capacity

    building

    4. Recognition o the impact and role o community caregivers who are volunteers provide support and

    to integrate into the public health system

    5. Advocate to implement the community caregivers policy. Also consider unding mobilization that is part

    o the government or sustainability

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    13/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    13ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    Ciil Societ Networking

    PARTICIPANTS

    Tapiwanashe, Redemptor, Nalishebo, Orgenes, Phillip

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    1. Broadly there are a number o CSOs and networks that are working on access to medicine. Mapping

    exercise needed

    2. Regional networks identied are:

    PATAM

    HAI Arica

    ANECCA

    Enquinet

    EPN

    3. There are many others working at country level

    4. Need to identiy key issues or advocacy

    Stop Stockouts

    CEPA

    Anti Microbial Resistance AMR

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. ConductaCSO/networkmappingonATM

    2. Come up with an umbrella campaign on ATM

    3. Agree on various components or the campaign

    4. Identifyleadorganization/networksforeachcomponent

    5. DevelopacomprehensivemediastrategyforongoingCSO/networkcommunication

    6. Network consumer society organization in this region

    7. Ideal to have an umbrella campaign that encompasses the components and the SADC business plan

    and the member organizations can link up to it

    8. TheumbrellacampaigntohaveparticularcomponentsthatareledbyCSOs/networkswithcapacity

    and experience9. LeadCSOs/networkstoorganizecapacitydevelopmentinordertofulllSARPAMobjectives

    10.AcomprehensivemediastrategywillhelpmemberCSOs/networkstonetworkwithinthecampaign

    11. Setting up an email list, website and development o campaign materials

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    14/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    14ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    Qalit o Medicines

    PARTICIPANTS

    Nalishebo, Orgenes, Cesar, Redemptor, Joseph, Phillip, Titus

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    Qualityisastandardnotaconcept

    CSOstopromotetheavailabilityofqualityaordablemedicines

    Needtodevelopregionalstandards

    CSOstoassistinissuestodowithpharmaceuticalvigilance,counterfeitmedicineinimprovingquality

    Capacitybuildingofregulatorsauthorizedtodierentiatebetweengenericsandcounterfeits

    CSOstoworklikequalitywatchdogsindealingwithpharmaceuticalvigilanceissues

    AdvocatingforCSOstobeinvolvedintheprocurementprocesses

    Recognize,rewardandprotecttheachievementsoftheregionalpre-qualiedfactoriese.g.factoryin

    Uganda

    Anti-counterfeitActstobedevelopedbuttheseshouldnotaectaccess

    CSOstogivesupporttotheregionalaccreditedlaboratories

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Advocate or recognition, rewards and protection o the regional WHO accredited laboratories

    2. Support the concept o regional quality control laboratories, und and supervise

    3. Advocate or regional mini standards

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    15/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    15ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    Research & inormation on Access to Medicines

    PARTICIPANTS

    Aarti, Shaun, Franco, Albert, Eva, Christa, Joseph, Cesar

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    Whatdrivesevidenceisthequestionsweask.CouldwehaveaFAQestablishedasaknowledgebase?

    Whatdowemeanbyresearch?CompilinginformationandevidenceonAEM,Advocatingforsharing

    and transparency o inormation. Existence o correct inormation. As CS we should contribute to the

    existence o accurate inormation we can also do research operational, actionoriented, etc. Use CS to

    gather inormation to triangulate what already exists. e.g. L2 and L1 WHO surveys

    Weneedadatabase(openaccess)whichgrowsacrossthe region,alsointernationally.Getcollective

    evidence on what is going on.

    What ino do we collect and how to get into the database?

    How to create a community o users around it? How to get it out?

    EPN ismapping pharmaceutical personnel in various (SADC) countries. Use thismethodology and

    compare to public sector in SADC countries?

    DFIDissponsoringtheATMResearchNetwork.WhatrolecanCShaveinthisformalizednetwork?Could

    we inorm the agenda? Can we provide the relevant academic research questions? CS may be the subject

    o or may implement the research. CS can assist each other: networking, training, identiying research

    areas, getting unds or research etc.

    Informationforadvocacypurposesinformationforpolicypurposes.Knowwhattodowiththeresultsto

    impact ATM.

    Domesticatetheresearchtomakeitusefulforcountrycontext

    RoleofCSindisseminationofresearchndingsEvidencebriefsoronepagersordecisionbriefsetc.

    Based on research: here are the ndings and here are the recommendations signed by those involved.

    Use as basis or advocacy and decision making.

    ImportanttohavelinksbetweenacademicinstituteandCS.

    NationallevelpartnersonSARPAM:communications,links,dedicatedtime,etc.SARPAMevidencefor

    Action network exists ensure it is linked to the SARPAM CS network

    Usetheinternationalnetworksandtheirresources,funding,abilities,time,toanalyzedataandevidence

    AEM access to essential medicine

    L1, L2 Level 1, Level 2 Surveys ( WHO)

    FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Set up the SARPAM observatory to include a clearing house on inormation on research, data studies,

    reports,toolsinSADC(withaFAQcapability)

    2. MechanismtoestablishaCSlinkingfacilitytotheATMResearchNetwork

    3. CSdevelopone-pageevidence-baseddecisionpapers(foraction,dissemination,inuencepolicy,etc)

    that will become widely recognized as having scientic, political and civic support4. EnsuretheSARPAMEvidenceforActionnetworkiswelllinkedtotheSARPAMCSNetwork

    5. Advocate or transparency o inormation

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    16/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    16ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    Good Goernance

    PARTICIPANTS

    Titus, Michael, Tasangana, Cryson, Gichinga, JoAnne, Wilbert, Donna

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    What is good governance? We need denitions!

    Corruption

    Transparencyandaccountability

    Regulation

    Politicalenvironment

    Eciency/eectiveness

    Outcomes

    CONCLuSION

    CivilSocietyneedstoengageingoodgovernanceandcanplayanimportantroleasawatchdogand

    lobbyist

    STRATEGy

    Insistonrobustdrugsupplysystemsthatarewellplanned,needsbasedandevidencebased Ensurethattherearemeasureable(SMART)andrelevantindicatorsthatcivilsocietycanmonitor

    CSOthenshouldactasacriticalwatchdog

    Insistongreatertransparency,whichwillleadtomoreaccountability

    Theprocesswillreducevulnerabilityforcorruption,promotemoreandbetterregulation,leadingtomore

    efcient systems and better access to better medication

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Civil Society to involve itsel in governance o the supply chain

    2. CSOs to act as a critical watchdog in procurement, quality, price and availability

    3. Promote robust, transparent systems

    impacting the

    whole supplychain

    Selection

    ProcurementBudgets

    Price

    FinanceDistribution

    UseofDrugs

    Availability

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    17/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    17ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    Hman Rights & Access to Medicines

    PARTICIPANTS

    Rose, Cesar, Christa, Tapiwanashe, Wilbert

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    AssessingHumanRightsaccesstomedicineincountries

    Accesstolife

    Accesstomedicineasaright

    Everyonehastherighttohealthandmedicine

    Righttohealth

    Accesstomedicineandhumanrights

    SADCprotocolsandtoolstobeusedforadvocatingforaccesstomedicine

    Countryconstitutionsasastartingpointforadvocatingforaccesstomedicines

    RSAinequalitiesduetounequalopportunities,commercializationofhealth.Languageweuseand

    how we communicate very important

    Zimbabweneedourgovernmentstotakearights-basedapproachtohealthcareandneedingallthe

    people TAC in SA an example o a success story

    In-countrysystemsi.e.SADCtribunalnotbeingutilized

    Howlitigationhasbeenusedtoensureaccesstomedicineandlegislation

    Howcanweget2billionpeopleaccesstomedicinerighttohealthcare,includingrighttomedicine?

    Rightsandresponsibilitiesmakingessentialmedicinesapublicgoodinvolvementofprivatesector

    to consider medicines as public goods

    Governmentshavesignedadeclarationofhumanrights

    Thereisahierarchythatexistsintermsofholding

    Healthhumanrightsandaccesstomedicines

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Evidence based advocacy need to build capacity in operational research so that evidence is based

    to hold governments accountable

    2. Empowering users through capacity building3. Legal campaigns mobilize legal instruments

    4. Being strategic, aligning and harmonizing all our competencies together and having a common

    ground or our work

    5. Document the evidence properly so that it can be shared across

    6. Comparing the countries

    9. LeadCSOs/networkstoorganizecapacitydevelopmentinordertofulllSARPAMobjectives

    10. AcomprehensivemediastrategywillhelpmemberCSOs/networkstonetworkwithinthecampaign

    11. Setting up an email list, website and development o campaign materials

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    18/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    18ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    Partnerships within SARPAM

    PARTICIPANTS

    Donna, Cryson, Phillip, Tasangana, Shaun, Aarti, Mike, Orgenes, Eva, Tapiwanashe

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    Anunderstandingoftermpartnership

    Whoarepartners?

    Denethe termpartnershipsinmorecleartermswithregardtopartnershipswithSARPAMwhatare

    roles and the benets or partners?

    RecognizethereareotherplayersinvolvedinATMandweneedtoincludethemsothereiscollaboration,

    not competition

    DiscussionofkeyareasoftheSADCPharmaceuticalBusinessPlan

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Partnershipsareformal,structuredwithMoUsand/orCOMPACTS3

    2. Ensure CS is always involved in all PACTs. SARPAM to provide platorm or building partnerships, especially

    with governments.

    3. Establish regional network and Reerence Group rom CS.

    4. Establish a CSOled PACT.

    5. Recognize a list o principles or engagement with SARPAM.

    6. CS representatives to signup to a ormal commitment Maniesto.

    7. Write up rom this meeting or representatives to share with their organizations.

    8. SARPAM to provide overview o SADC PBP to wider group.

    3. MoU/Compacts:AnMoUistypicallyabilateralagreementwherethepartiescanseekexternalarbitrationifeitherpartydefaultsontheagreement,

    whereas a Compact is a multiparty agreement that needs to be enorced through mutual accountability.

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    19/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    19ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    Sppl Chain Management

    PARTICIPANTS

    Franco, Malishebo, Albert, Joseph, Cesar, Titus, Christa, Wilbert, Redemptor

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    Comparesupplychainsintheregion(countries)Similarities?Dierences?Bottlenecks?

    Whatarethebarriers?

    a No coordinated, national level policies poor implementation and procedures

    b Weak institutions PSM, quality assessment, CMS, NMRAs

    c Poor inrastructure to support medicine delivery roads, cold chain, storage

    d Weak stock management procedures

    e) Insucient/irrationalnancingforPSMactivities(prioritizing) Corruption

    Civilstrife(politicalenvironment,war)

    WhatistheroleofCS?CapacitybuildingonPSMissues?MandEofcoreindicators?

    StrengtheningsupplychainsofMissionDSOs&GovernmentCMSs

    UseofIT?

    Transparency/disclosureofinformationanddata(e.g.quantication,etc)

    ThinktankonPSM(regionallevel),sharinginformation/bestpractices

    PrioritysettingalongPSMe.g.selectionofEMs

    Pooled procurement quantication of needs, negotiations with suppliers (promote among

    countries at regional level. 3 studies done 4th study ongoing by Arica development Bank in

    SADC show it can be done. never implemented WHY? Possible reasons: Bureaucracies,

    Procurement kingdoms, No shared dollars, No harmonised NMRA, No exchange o inormation

    inormed buying

    WhatcouldCSdo?Campaignagainstbureaucracy!Implementtherecommendationsoftheabove

    studies

    Stockouts-

    Match disease patterns and stocks at any level

    Promote local production

    - DoweknowthemostappropriatePSMsystemtomeetrequirements/demands?Istherea

    success story No.!

    SAAB SA Access Barometer SSO Stop Stock Outs

    FBO Faith Based Organizations (mission) PSM Procurement Supply Management

    CMS Central Medicine Stores NMRA National Medicines Regulatory Authority

    DSO Drug Supply Organization

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. CS coalition umbrella regional establish the SARPAM Coalition

    2. M&E by CS o PSM e.g. SSO campaign extend to SADC SAAB report

    3. CS Policy Audit annual report card

    4. Study the barriers to implementation o the recommendations rom the PP studies and network

    among those organizations working on governance: META, HAI Arica, NEPAD, and AU?

    5. Involve/EngageCSintechnicalissues(withtechnicalsupportasnecessary)sharelessonsfrom

    FBOse.g.Quanticationmethods/exerciseatnationallevel

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    20/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    20ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    TRIPS and Trade

    PARTICIPANTS

    Franco, Albert, Tasangana, Wilbert

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    Compulsorylicensingtocountriestoprovidecountriespatentpoolnegotiations

    STATuS OF TRIPS

    Middleincomecountrieshavetobecompliantby2000whilelowincomecountrieshavetobeby

    2016. Arican countries are producing or are in the oreront o producing rst line. By 2016 LDCs will

    be needed to be aligned with TRIPS. German government supporting countries that want to go or

    complete licensing. Complete licensing is always point o patent laws. I old activists get involved it

    could be watered down.

    WhycountriesalwayssignandcomplainingHealthsystem/ministryisalwaysweakercomparedto

    the trade ministry.

    Activists have to be carefulwhen discussing issues ofTRIPS. Most countries areTRIPS compliant.

    Correct and right inormation need to be given.

    Need to have apaper (research) forthe14countries on the correct statein termsofcompliance.

    In Europe there is a lot o case studies by pharmaceuticals but there is a need or comprehensive

    inormation and acts rom Arica.

    Makelinkswithlegislators/seminarsonTRIPS.Needtohavemeetingwithhealthandtradecommittees

    at national and regional level. Need or inormation to be presented in a language or the lay people.

    T.Matika(Seatini/Equinet)willshareadocumentpresentedtoSADConTRIPS.

    PATENT POOL

    TherewasameetinginGermanyandtherewasanagreementaboutthefactthatinformationneeded

    to be claried about the process. Middle income and low income countries are already pressed to

    enter the patent pool. Need more inormation on issues o patent pool

    TRIPS

    Move and encourage countries like South Africa for the adaptation and implementation of the

    competition law. We need to analyze the scenario between now and 2016 to see how TRIPS roll out.

    A question which we must also ollow is to see what will happen in 2017. Analysis results need to beproduced so it can be presented to CS Organizations.

    RECOMMENDATIONS:

    1. Arican civil societies need to take up advocacy and be a watchdog o maximum exibilities and

    minimizing TRIPS + restrictions.

    2. Need foranoverviewstudy/ research amongthe14countrieson thecurrentstateofTRIPS and

    compliance(quick/rapidassessment).

    3. More inormation needed to be provided on patent pool and how it is going to work and what benets

    it provides to SARPAM beore moving orward.

    4. Meetings with regional policy bodies and countries on TRIPS where bries are provided.

    5. Brieng to health and trade ministry people on discussion o TRIPS.

    6. Patent ree essential medicines or SARPAM members should be pushed or by CSOs in the region.

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    21/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    21ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    Priate Sector Engagement

    PARTICIPANTS

    Shaun, Orgenes, Tasangana, Gichinga, Titus, Joseph

    MAIN POINTS DISCuSSED

    Denitionofprivatesectordiersindierentcountries(e.g.Privateforprot,Privatenotforprot).

    Privatesectorhasanimportantroletoplay,especiallyprivateprovidersofhealthservice.

    Alotofsuspicionofprivateforprot.Tendstobeexcludedfrompublicsectorinitiatives.

    Ecienciesandinnovationofprivatesector.Oftenmoreeectivegovernanceinprivatesector.

    Goodexamplesofprivatesectorinitiativese.g.Accesstomalariaproductsinitiative(AMP),ADDO

    accredited drug outlets MSH.

    Whatistheevidenceforlackofprivatesectoraccountabilityordelivery?

    Distinguish between prices of medication vs. cost of treatment. Private sector can be more cost

    eective.

    TrendistowardsNationalHealthInsurance,whichrequiresprivatesector.

    PrivatesectorhasnottakenfulladvantageofTRIPSprovisionsbecauseoflackofgovernmentsupport

    e.g. For comparison licensing. This impedes access.

    Insomecountriesthereisoverregulationoftheprivatesector.Controlvs.collaboration.

    Needpositiveengagement(ratherthannegativeengagement).

    Denetheproblemstobesolved/challengedforinnovativeresponse.

    Denerulesofengagementforethicalpractice.

    CScanlobbymultinationalstodomoreanddelivermoresocialbenet.

    Normaltenderingprocessdoesnotallowforblendedvalueoers(includingsocialcontribution).

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    1. Invite private sector in all SARPAM Partnerships or Action.

    2. Assess to what extent private companies have taken advantage o TRIPS or better use o TRIPS

    exibilities?

    3. CSO Platorm or open debate and positive engagement on role o private sector with government

    acilitation4. Play an honest broker role in a 3 party orum with Government and MNCs. Possible link to MeTA.

    5. Advocate or delegated corporate social responsibility by MNCs to country level.

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    22/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    22ANNEX D | RECORD OF OPEN AGENDA DISCUSSIONS continued

    TOPIC

    Drat Maniesto or Ciil Societ Action on Access to Medicines in Sothern Arica

    (Developed through a meeting o: Gichinga, Shaun, Eva, Phillip, Titus)

    PuRPOSE

    A document that denes how we collaborate, as CSOs, in the context o SARPAM. Obligations, responsibilities

    o CSOs and o SARPAM and commits partner to SARPAM

    PRINCIPLES

    Participateinpartnershipsforactionwherecontributionswilladdvalue

    Commitment to thepurposeandobjectivesof SARPAM (plusprinciples)of SADC pharmaceutical

    business plan.

    Sharinginformationandresourcestoassistothers(growtogether)opencollaboration

    Activeparticipation

    Acceptingandaccountabilitycontributionsfromeveryone

    Allowleadershipoftheorganization/swiththebestcompositiononspecicissues

    Mutualrespectandrecognitionofrolesandcontributions,sharedbenets

    OBLIGATIONS

    Participateintheplatform(CSActionNetwork).Openconsultation

    Inviteinparticipatingbyotherregionalandnationalstakeholders

    Allowcontributionbyalltoacommonagenda

    SignuptothecommitmenttoeachPACTthattheorganizationparticipatesin.

    RESPONSIBILITIES

    Sharedresponsibility

    Acceptabilityagainstagreedcommitments

    Workwithinnationallegalframeworks

    Consultmembers

    ELIGIBILITy

    RegionalCSOoraliateofaregionalCSO(butnotbeexclusive)

    AgreecriteriasuchasworkingonATM,membershipbase,fundingsource,etc

    RECOMMENDATIONS:

    1. Use MeTA denition o CSO

    2. Establishadvisory/ReferenceGrouptoco-ordinate

    3. Include statement o recognition o reason or CSO participation in maniest

    4. Drat maniesto taken back to organizations by meeting representatives

    5. Signatories will be listed as partners o SARPAM

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    23/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    23

    RES

    uLTS

    (To-BeAchieved)

    ANECA

    EPN

    FIP

    HAIAFRICA

    META

    P

    ATAM

    SEATINI

    (EQuINET)

    TAC

    a

    Imp

    roved

    Regional

    Organization

    o

    CS

    Internal

    Organization

    Weca

    nassistwith

    theor

    ganizationo

    SARPA

    Masavibrant

    s

    tructure

    b

    Inormation

    Sorces

    Identifed

    Provide

    inormationonthe

    competenciesthat

    areavailablewithin

    themembership

    So

    meoour

    me

    mbersare

    invo

    lvedinATM

    wo

    rkandcan

    prov

    idebaseline

    inormation

    SEATINIcanidentiy

    inormation

    (existing)on

    essentialdrugslist

    andmarketpricing

    including

    availability

    c

    D

    ata

    Collection

    Workthroughour

    technicalteamto

    carryoutdata

    gathering/research

    atregionallevel

    withemphasis

    onPeadiatric

    medicines

    EP

    Ncan

    provid

    erelevant

    inorm

    ationrom

    then

    etworkto

    supportsetupo

    monito

    ringsystem

    Su

    pervise

    nation

    allevelsur-

    vey,manager

    ordatacollection

    3prospective

    METAcountries

    unitedorMETA

    GlobalForum

    London

    29June-1July

    So

    meoour

    countrymembers

    cancollectdataas

    they

    arealready

    workingonthat

    SEATINIcan

    collectdatarelated

    essentialdrugslist

    andmarket

    pricingincluding

    availability

    d

    Inormation

    Sh

    aring

    EPNcansupport

    Datacollectionrom

    membercountries

    specif

    callyrom

    FBO

    sector

    SADCcountries

    andCSOmeetat

    ZambiaForum

    1stweekJune

    Wecansharethe

    inor

    mationthat

    PATAMhasbased

    on

    ongoing

    a

    ctivities

    SEATINIcanshare

    inormationon

    essentialdrugslist

    Sha

    reevidence

    orca

    sestudiesvia

    M

    SF/ARASA

    e

    Advocac

    based

    onIno

    Spearheada

    regionaladvocacy

    campaignonaccess

    tomedicinesin

    SADCregion

    Beingamember-

    shiporganization

    withm

    embersin

    anumb

    eroSADC

    countriesEPNcan

    provideinormation

    onPSM/supply

    syste

    msinthe

    countries

    N

    etwork

    sto

    ck-outs,

    ca

    mpaign

    pa

    rtnersin

    SADC

    PATAM

    s7strengths

    liesinadvocacy

    SEATINIcancarry

    outadvocacy

    workthrough

    Parliamentary

    Portolio

    Committees

    Regional

    mo

    bilisationin

    a

    ddressing

    advo

    cacygapson

    stock-out,drug

    p

    ricesand

    a

    vailability

    (TAC/??)

    ANNEX E | FIRST DRAFT CS-Led PARTNERSHIP FOR ACTION (PACT) FRAMEWORK

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    24/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    24

    RES

    uLTS

    (To-BeAchieved)

    ANECA

    EPN

    FIP

    HAIAFRICA

    META

    P

    ATAM

    SEATINI

    (EQuINET)

    TAC

    Tra

    ining

    Buildcapacityo

    ANECCAmembers

    onpaediatric

    ormulationsand

    medicines

    1.Auditoexisting

    technical

    personnel

    2.Inormation

    sharingthrough

    member

    organization.

    3.Examinationo

    levelotraining

    onaccessmatter.

    4.Advocacyon

    thoseintraining

    onaccessmatter.

    5.Examine

    relevanceo

    existingtraining

    toaccessissues

    Trainin

    g

    1.Age

    nda

    2.Met

    hods

    3.Tools

    4.Training

    Materials

    5.Prov

    ideTrainer

    PA

    TAMcan

    help

    withpolicy

    develo

    pmentaswe

    havem

    emberswith

    techn

    icalcapacity

    g

    Polic

    Development

    Usecurrentand

    availableevidence

    todevelop/review

    policieson

    medicines

    Policy/strategy

    development

    Pushorpolicy

    review/develop-

    mentviaARASA

    h

    Stakeholder

    Enga

    gement

    i

    Dissemination

    j

    RegionalData-

    bases/InoHb

    ANNEX E | FIRST DRAFT CS-Led PARTNERSHIP FOR ACTION (PACT) FRAMEWORK

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    25/39

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    26/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    26ANNEX G

    FOR CIVIL SOCIETY ACTION ON ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN SOUTHERN AFRICA

    PREAMBLE

    The Southern Arica Regional Programme on Access to Medicines and Diagnostics SARPAM provides an

    opportunity to make a critical dierence to peoples lives within the Southern Arican Development Community

    SADC region and to encourage and support change that will address the complex issues relating to access

    to medicines and diagnostics. One o the key outputs o the programme is an increased voice and inuence o

    civil society reected in policies on access to medicines and diagnostics in Southern Arica.

    Experience rom the Medicines Transparency Alliance MeTA countries has shown that Civil Society CS has

    a vital role in keeping pharmaceutical companies, health proessionals and government civil servants and

    organizations transparent, honest and accountable and CS organizations, along with the private sector and

    governments as equal partners, are key actors to jointly seek solutions.

    We, representing the Ciil Societ with interest in increasing access to medicines in the Sothern Arica

    region are signatories to this maniesto as ollows:

    PuRPOSE:

    This document denes how we, the partaking civil society and aith based organizations CSOs and FBOs

    collaborate, in the context o SARPAM. It species the intent, obligations, responsibilities and expectations o

    SARPAM and our commitments as partners in SARPAM.

    COMMITMENTS:

    We commit to:

    Participateinpartnershipsor action PACT where our contributions will add value SupportthepurposeandactivelyparticipateinpursuitoftheobjectivesofSARPAMandtheprinciplesof

    the SADC Pharmaceutical Business Plan.

    Shareinformation,expertise and resources,and fosteropencollaborationand consultation inorder to

    assist each other towards mutual growth and success.

    BeaccountabletoourCSpartnersonissuesthatwecommittocarryout.

    AllowthepartnerCSorganization(s)withthebestexperienceandmostappropriatemandatetoleadothers

    when working jointly on specic issues.

    Mutuallyrespectandrecognizerolesandcontributionsofeachpartnertoacommonagendaandtoshare

    benets.

    Participatein theplatform,Civil Society ActionNetwork,by contributing ideas, comments, advice and

    documents as may be appropriate or requested.

    Inviteandsupporttheparticipationofotherregionalstakeholdersinordertoincreasecapacitytoachieve

    our objectives

    SignupandadheretothecommitmenttoeachPACTthatourorganization(s)participatesin.

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    27/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    27

    RESPONSIBILITIES:

    We accept shared responsibility, acceptability and accountability against these agreed commitments. We

    urther accept to work within national legal rameworks and to consult members regularly.

    ELIGIBILITy:

    We commit to the acknowledgement o diersit, broad representation and inclsiit. Thereore

    initation or signatories are extended bt not limited to:

    EstablishedandrecognizedregionalCSOsandFBOsoraliatesofsuchorganizations.

    Anyorganizationwhichmeetsminimumcriteriaformembershipsuchasworkingonorinterestinaccess

    to medicines ATM, membership base, unding source, etc.

    EXPECTATIONS

    We expect the Responsible Action Consortim managing the Sothern Arica Regional Programme to:

    UseMeTAdenitionofCivilSocietyinthisrelationship.

    FacilitatetheworkoftheReferenceGroupthathasbeenestablishedbytheCS.

    SupporttheCSinimplementingtheagreedprogrammeofworkasmaybenecessary.

    Facilitaterelationship-buildingbetweentheCSandtheSADCsecretariat,governments,privatesector,

    donors and other partners committed to increasing access to medicines in the region.

    KeepanaccuraterecordofsignatoriestothismanifestoandtolistthemaspartnersofSARPAM

    Name and Stamp o CS Organization Responsible Action Consortium Stamp

    Signature Signature

    Date Date

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    28/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    28ANNEX H | CASE STUDY: PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION

    PuRPOSE

    The purpose o this case study is to illustrate how the PACT approach was applied to achieve the ollowing

    purpose:

    TO FORGE A CIvIL SOCIETy PARTNERSHIP TO IMPROvE ACCESS TO MEDICINES INSOuTHERN AFRICA

    A key principle o the PACT approach is that the participants take ownership o the PACT content and

    conversations. Although there is a ramework that the PACT ollows, the agenda, the conversations and

    agreements are incubated and driven by the participants. The ollowing diagram illustrates the process:

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    PREPARING THE

    ENvIRONMENT

    INTRODuCING THE

    APPROACHArrival Opening

    Reection ClosingExercise

    Purpose

    Proposals oraction

    PACTMatrix

    Agreementon results& partners

    Denitiono PACTs

    How?

    Summary Clariy nextsteps

    ClosingExercise

    Finalreections byparticipants

    Marketplaceo topics

    List openagenda

    discussiontopics

    List openagenda

    discussiontopics

    Relate to

    SARPAM and

    SADC PBP

    DEFINING THE OPEN

    AGENDA

    PACT

    CONvERSATIONS

    RE-FOCuS AGENDA

    FOR 2ND SESSION

    REvIEW

    PROGRESS

    PACT

    CONvERSATIONS

    PLANNING

    FOR ACTION

    DEFINE RESuLTS AND

    PARTNER CONTRIBuTIONSS

    CLOSE

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    29/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    29ANNEX H | CASE STUDY: PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION continued

    THE SCENE

    A large meeting room and in the centre a circle o empty chairs.

    On the periphery, ve tables each with seating or 10 people, a rereshment station and a stationery

    desk.

    On the walls, some posters and a banner bearing the SARPAM logo with the words: How can

    we work in partnership to improve access to medicines in southern Arica?

    When participants arrive, they move in and seat themselves at random in the main seating area.

    The Civil Society Technical Lead, SARPAM members and

    head o the civil society programme, briey welcomes

    everyone to the workshop, describing it as the rst step

    in a process that aims to change the situation or the

    people o southern Arica through improved access

    to essential medicines. The SARPAM director and

    the acilitator rom ReAction!, the lead company in a

    consortium responsible or implementing SARPAM, areintroduced.

    In a short introduction to SARPAM, the SARPAM Director

    covers DFIDs central role in SARPAM, explaining the

    thinking behind the ninemonth inception phase or

    SARPAM a pregnancy that we hope will deliver a live

    born child and the dual nature o SARPAM working

    with the SADC Secretariat and SADC member states on

    the one hand, and with civil society structures on the

    other. The Director emphasises the regional nature o

    SARPAM and how this mandate could be taken up byCSOs. The rules o the game are not ocusing at the

    individual country level.

    The workshop acilitator takes the lead and highlights

    the central question: How can we work in partnership

    to improve access to medicines in southern Arica? She

    gestures to a blank wall and says: This is our agenda or

    the next two days . . . this is your journey, your process

    and you set the agenda.

    1

    2

    PREPARING THE ENvIRONMENT

    INTRODuCING THE APPROACH

    Poster describing the purpose o the meeting

    Facilitator illustrating the agenda

    Facilitator beginning the open space

    acilitation process

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    30/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    30

    Ticket to ride . . . openness, choice, new beginnings.

    The acilitator gives each person in the circle a ticket or

    the twoday journey a card containing an afrmation

    in the rst person. My intuition is powerul, I have thereedom to choose, I let go o the past. Participants are

    invited to read out the message on the ticket.

    With the mood set, the acilitator outlines the our principles o the workshop:

    Showupandchoosetobepresent.

    Beopentotheoutcomenotattachedtoit.

    Payattentiontowhathasheartandmeaning.

    Tellthetruthwithoutblameorjudgment.

    Thefacilitatorrequestseveryparticipanttoidentifyanyissuesoropportunitiesthats/hewouldlike

    to discuss during the course o the workshop, to write each item on an individual sheet o A4 paper

    and to put his or her name on it.

    A RuSH OF IDEAS

    Participants duly take sheets o paper, write down their subjects, and read them out loudly.

    Iminterestedin the supply chain howdowegetdrugsoutof the storeroomsand into

    communities.

    Myinterestissharingadvocacystrategiesforaccesstoessentialmedicines.

    Iproposetalkingaboutacoalitiontoinuencepolicyontheaordabilityofmedicines.

    IminterestedinTRIPSandmedicinesandtheimpactoffreetradeagreements.

    . . . and so on.

    They then stick their suggestions on the blank wall

    indicated earlier which now carries a sign reading

    Community Notice Board.

    The acilitator explains that each one o thesesubjects will be the ocus o a meeting, which will

    be chaired and run by the originator o the topic.

    Participants can sign up or any meeting they are

    interested in.

    Two laws or participation in meetings are explained to the group:

    The LawoftheBumbleBeeandtheButterywhichsanctionspeople ittingdiscussion

    between groups to pollinate or add value.

    TheLawoftheTwoFeetwhichencouragesparticipantstomoveoutofadiscussiongroup

    where they are not engaged and join another.

    Posters describing the workshop principles

    A rush o ideas rom the participants

    3 CONSTRuCTING THE AGENDA

    ANNEX H | CASE STUDY: PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION continued

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    31/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    31ANNEX H | CASE STUDY: PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION continued

    Everyone goes to inspect the Community Notice Board,

    with a view to merge topics or add new ones where there

    are gaps. Participants begin to identiy common ground

    between their own proposals and those o others. They

    move individual sheets o paper so that clusters or lists o

    related topics emerge and in this way, meeting themes

    are dened.

    10 CENTRAL DISCuSSION THEMES EMERGE:

    Capacitybuilding

    NetworkingamongCSOs(Partnershipislater

    extracted as a dierent topic

    TRIPSandtradeissues

    Good governance and research (Research is

    later dened as a separate topic

    Supplychain

    Medicinesquality

    Communityinvolvement

    Privatesectorengagement.

    The agenda is now nalised and trading or time and venue begins. With the groups permission, the

    acilitator helps rationalise the process o allocating time slots and meeting venues.

    Four time slots are carved out or meetings, with between two and our meetings running at the same

    time.

    For the remainder o the rst day and the rst hour on Day 2, the meetings on participants sel

    selected themes continue. Each group is chaired by an individual who proposed one o the original

    topics that was collapsed into the theme. Main discussion points and recommendations are captured

    on a standard reporting orm. These orms are posted on the Community Notice Board and, romtime to time, the acilitator reminds participants to consult the board to see what other groups have

    debated and concluded.

    The groups are very stable and participants intensely involved. The meetings are small enough or

    everyone to have a say and hardly anyone makes use o the Law o the Two Feet.

    The Community Notice Board

    Trading or time and venue begins

    4 PACT CONvERSATIONS

    Engaging the issues . . . and each other

    Participants engage in discussion at meetings around sel-selected themes

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    32/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    32

    The rst day concludes with a game a modied version o charades and reection on the day. Asked

    to describe their experiences, participants venture:

    Itwasdierent.

    Fast.

    Wesaidatthebeginningthiswouldtakeustwoweeks.Ittookusoneday.

    At the beginning therewasmoreopportunity for our voiceto beheard.Thistimewe felt the

    workshop was owned by us.

    Peoplefelt alittlebitmoreinformationwasneededaboutSARPAM.Whoweareandwhatwill

    happen when we leave this room.

    The acilitator comments on how things appeared through her lens:

    Theagenda-settingwasextremelyrapidandamazinglyrich.

    Peoplewereintenselyengagedindiscussion;almostnousewasmadeoftheLawoftheTwoFeet.

    The acilitator touches on aspects o a number o discussions and mentions that the meeting on

    partnership had come up with the idea o a maniesto that would be the oundation o the civil

    society CS partnership within SARPAM.

    A discussion on how the process should unold, ollows. Participants express a need to ocus and move

    towards an action plan:

    IhavefearswecouldbeasinactiveastheSADCPharmaceuticalBusinessPlan.

    Weneedabitmorestructure,alittlebetterideaofwherethedestinationlies.

    The acilitator conrms that most o Session 2 will be devoted mostly to prioritisation and action

    planning.

    A game o charades and reections toconclude Day 1

    The acilitator reects on the learning rom theday rom her lens

    5 REvIEW PROGRESS

    ANNEX H | CASE STUDY: PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION continued

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    33/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    33ANNEX H | CASE STUDY: PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION continued

    6

    7

    8

    RE-FOCuS AGENDA FOR 2ND SESSION

    The Facilitator opens the next session. She creates a space or participants to reect on the previoussession and give eedback on their thoughts or the progress o this session.

    Ater that, seated in the central circle, they receive a

    detailed outline o SARPAM which DFID has initiated and

    unded as a partnership venture, not a new entity. The

    inormal presentation covers the broad objectives o the

    programme, the specic work o the inception phase, the

    rationale or the inception phase, the main players in the

    Responsible Action Consortium, the budget allocation by

    DFID, and the respective collaborations with civil society,

    the SADC Secretariat, and governments in the region.

    Participants gather in three discussion groups to complete the PACT meeting schedule rom Session 1.

    The participants response is positive, captured in the comment: I want to suggest we look at ourselves

    as the drivers o this agenda. We must own the platorm.

    The acilitator invites participants to examine the

    recommendations o the various meetings posted on

    the walls and to rame those that appeal most to them

    as proposals or joint action. This proposal can be an

    individual or joint eort, but the proposers should

    canvas support or the idea. Every participant has ten

    votes represented by red stickerdots which they can

    use as they like to indicate support or various proposals.

    Some participants are active in canvassing support or their proposals while others simply pastethem on the notice board and hope the ideas will speak or themselves. Ater all proposals have been

    pasted up the process o discussing their merits begins.

    The SARPAM Director chairs this session, where necessary providing inormation about how the

    proposal relates to other actions that SARPAM will undertake in the inception phase.

    PACT CONvERSATIONS

    PLANNING FOR ACTION

    SARPAM Director outlines the partnership

    venture

    Support or various proposals indicates by redstickers or votes

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    34/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    34

    A TASTE OF THE PROPOSALS

    DevelopaframeworkforcollaborativeworkwithSADC(becauseitismoreproductivetobeatthe

    table than to shout rom the sidelines.

    Conductahumanresourcesmappingexercise,focusingonpharmacists.

    Advocatefortheharmonisationofdiagnosticprocessesandtreatmentguidelinesforselectedhealth

    conditions.

    Establishasystemforcivilsocietydatacollectionandwatch-doggingofprices,supplychainsand

    availability o medicines in acilities.

    As the discussion proceeds, some proposals are combined

    and others are eliminated. The wording o some o the

    rontrunners is changed to make proposals more inclusive

    and suited to the dierent cultures o various civil society

    groupings.

    In the end, the rst CS Partnership or Action is dened as

    ollows:

    To establish a joint civil society system or gathering inormation on pricing o selected medicines,

    supply chain eectiveness and availability o these medicines at acility level.

    The Director indicates that this will strengthen one o the main deliverables o SARPAM during the

    inception stage: an analysis o pharmaceutical markets across the SADC region.

    ACTIvITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

    At this point a giant matrix on the wall behind the

    chairperson becomes the ocus o attention. Participants

    are asked to:

    Completethelefthandcolumnbyproposingcategories

    o key activities needed or the partnership project

    that they have adopted. These are then put into time

    sequence.

    Identifyappropriateorganizations inside and outside

    the room who could be valuable contributors to this

    partnership or action PACT, and spread these across

    the top row.

    Each o the activities and potential partner organizations is

    written on a large Postit note and slotted into the matrix

    in the relevant cell. Each organization is given a dierent

    colour code.

    Those organizations in the room are then asked to outline more specically what they mightbe able to contribute in terms o the various categories o activity. These details are written on Postit

    notes in the organizations colour and posted into the relevant cell on the matrix.

    Participants identiy proposals or joint action

    Matrix on the wall to denote key activities andresponsibilities

    Participants discussing contributions to thefrst CS partnership

    9 DEFINE RESuLTS AND PARTNER CONTRIBuTIONSS

    ANNEX H | CASE STUDY: PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION continued

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    35/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    35

    The eect is illustrated below. An organization that posts a note under training, or example, might say:

    Produce training materials and supply trainers.

    The column or organizations not represented at the workshop, obviously, remains blank and their

    commitments will be established at a later stage.

    Activities EPN HAI Patam Aneca Seatini etc . . .

    Internal organization

    Identiy existing ino

    Data collection

    Inormation sharing

    Advocacy

    Training

    Policy development

    The matrix has eectively become the oundation o a plan o action and two months o planning have,

    indeed, been accomplished in two days.

    The CS Technical Lead acilitates the closing discussion

    and directs attention to three key tasks:

    Organising the partner organizations so that theprocess can move orward.

    Framingthepurposeandobjectivesofthepartnership

    in language that is clear and acceptable to all.

    Creatingchannelsforcontinuedcommunication.

    ORGANIzING THE CS PACT

    The CS Technical Lead appeals to the group or assistance with organizing the partnership internally. A

    task team is created with our key regional organizations HAI Arica, EPN, Patam and Aneca identied

    as its core members. Each organization will determine who will represent it.

    It is urther agreed that one person rom these organizations or one o their member organizations will

    representtheCSPACTatameetinginCapeTownon29/30MarchwherethebroaderSARPAMmarket

    analysis process will be discussed in detail.

    FRAMING THE PACTS PuRPOSE AND MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES

    Apart rom attending to the objectives o the CS Pact, the task team would consider and strengthen

    the recommendations o the workshop group on partnerships. They would revise, complete and

    circulate the drat maniesto or PACT members, a document intended to be mutually binding

    among partners.

    CS Technical Lead acilitates closing discussion

    10 CLOSE

    ANNEX H | CASE STUDY: PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION continued

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    36/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    36

    COMMuNICATION

    Participants suggest that SARPAM needs a dedicated, wellunctioning website as a channel or communication.

    The SARPAM Director explains the acility o the Frontline SMS system which will eventually be tollree orusers. Participants with mobile phones that are unctional in Kenya are invited to register immediately on the

    SMS system.

    CLARIFy NEXT STEPS

    IMMEDIATE NEXT STEPS

    Thetaskteamwillmeetsoon.

    Thedraftmanifestoandstatementofresponsibilitieswillbecirculatedtoallparticipantstogetherwitha

    summary o the meeting.

    Eachparticipantshouldmeetwithhis/herorganizationtodiscussitscommitments tothePACTand

    prepare a detailed description o the role it could play within the planning ramework developed. TheSARPAMsecretariatwilltalkone-on-onewitheachorganizationtoestablishresourcerequirements

    in the inception phase and beyond.

    CLOSING EXERCISE

    Completing the pictre

    The acilitator resumes acilitation and invites everyone to reect on the twoday experience and the amount

    ofworkachieved.Sheaskseachparticipanttotakethejigsawpieces/hewasgivenatthestartofthedayand

    to help build a puzzle on the table in the middle o the circle.

    The jigsaw gradually takes shape and resembles the SARPAM banner: How can we work in partnership to

    improve access to medicines in southern Arica?

    Asked to comment on the jigsaw, people note there are pieces missing, and its a bit uneven and insecure,

    but the image and the words are quite recognisable. As they speak they realise this is a metaphor or the

    partnershipbuilding and projectplanning process they have just undertaken.

    In a nal symbolic act, individuals close the circle by shaking hands with the person on either side.

    Closing Jigsaw game The puzzle takes shape

    ANNEX H | CASE STUDY: PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION continued

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    37/39

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    38/39

    SARPAMCSMEETI

    NGREPORT|CivilSocietyPartnershipforActiononAccesstoMedicines&Diagnosticsin

    SouthernAfrica

    38ANNEX I | WORKSHOP EVALUATION

    CSO Workshop: 2122 March 2010How can we as Ciil Societ improe Access to Medicines in Sothern Arica?

    WORKS

    HOP

    WAyFORWARD

    FACILITIES

    1 2 3 4

    1. Understanding o purpose 2 6

    2. Achievement o workshop objective 1 10 6

    3. Methodology and approach 1 7 11

    4. Facilitation process and support 8 11

    5. Level o participation o all delegates 1 5 13

    6. Handling o questions and concerns 2 9 8

    7. Building o relationships and networks 12 7

    GENERAL REFLECTIONS AND SuGGESTIONS FOR FuTuRE CSO WORKSHOPS:

    Good keep it up. Ensure that we all have the necessary background ino needed to be more resourceul in terms o partici

    pation e.g. ino about SARPAM, your expectations and why you need CSO engagement should have beenclear upront.

    I like the open agenda as a concept but or a group with no real connection beore hand I think a bit morestructure would have helped.

    Advance planning. InitiallyIfearedthenoagendaapproachbutnowIappreciateit.Thankyou!

    Involve more networks The workshop achieved a lot in two days the achievements exceeded my expectations. A new methodology thereore may take time to get ully knowledgeable. Perhaps an understanding o the key aims, expected results and the methodology. Also need more clarity

    at the beginning

    8. Clarity on individual role and accountability 4 11 4

    9. Idea o uture communication through sms technology 1 2 11 5

    GENERAL REFLECTIONS AND COMMENTS ON AGREED WAy FORWARD:

    I liked the idea o participants coming up with the agenda. It looks realistic. I hope we shall adhere to it. It was a good beginning. Obviously it sets the basis or moving orward. More clarity needed but that is

    within sight. Notfullysatisedwiththeaction/pactareaagreedbutwillsupportit.

    Need or better clarity on dierence between individual role and tting into a bigger picture. Very good because cellphones are now available everywhere. Better more use o emails or record keeping purposes. Lesser use o SMS. Acceptable, can be improved.

    Will become more clear as next steps report, communications evolve

    9. Workshop venue and resources 6 13

    10. Accommodation and meals 8 10

    11. Travel logistics and arrangements 3 11 3

    GENERAL REFLECTIONS AND COMMENTS:

    Great organization. Well organized, good approach, results have been achieved rom nothing no agenda. Good start. SARPAM must sustain the interest, share ino and ensure that the momentum is not lost. The methodology and vision or the meeting was quite interesting and opened more opportunities o

    ownership. Good.

    The methodology and the principles o this workshop need to be tried elsewhere in Arica. Great meeting, the approach was completely innovative but idea in allowing participants to see the

    agenda. Keep it up Sharon and Shaun. This was a really great. Good venture. This has proved that an agenda put up by participants enable them. To discuss broadly and in deep the

    contents, since they are issues being encountered daily

    SCORE KEy:

    1 POOR; 2 SATISFACTORY; 3 GOOD; 4 EXCELLENT

  • 8/7/2019 CSO Report

    39/39