csfb energy summit february 25, 2015 · csfb energy summit february 25, 2015. 2 forward‐looking...

32
1 CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015

Upload: others

Post on 12-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

1

CSFB Energy SummitFebruary 25, 2015

Page 2: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

2

Forward‐looking StatementsThis presentation contains projections and

other forward‐looking statements within the

meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities

Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the U.S.

Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These

projections and statements reflect the

Company’s current views with respect to

future events and financial performance. No

assurances can be given, however, that these

events will occur or that these projections will

be achieved, and actual results could differ

materially from those projected as a result of

certain factors. A discussion of these factors

is included in the Company’s periodic reports

filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange

Commission.

Contact:

Karen AciernoDirector – Investor [email protected]‐285‐4957

Mark BurfordVP – Capital Markets & Planning

Cimarex Energy Co.1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 3700Denver, CO 80203303‐295‐3995

Page 3: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

3

Corporate Profile

3

Shares outstanding………………..…87.7 MM Proved reserves3……………..…….. 3.1 Tcfe

Market cap1……………………...…….....….$10.1 B % Natural gas…………………….. 53%

Long-term debt 2……………...…………...………..$1.5 B % Proved developed……………………..…………….77%

Enterprise value……………………...…..$11.6 B R/P Ratio……………………..…………….13.7x

Stockholders' equity2………………….………..$4.5 B Production4

………………...…….. 950 MMcfe/d

Debt/Cap2……………………………...……..25%

Quarterly dividend of $0.16/share

1 Share price as of February 23, 20152 At December 31,20143 As of December 31, 20144 Fourth quarter 2014

Page 4: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

4

• Focused on idea generation and execution

• Diverse portfolio of assets provides flexibility

— Balanced commodity mix: Proved reserves are 53% natural gas— Regional optionality: Permian Basin and Mid‐Continent

• Strong balance sheet

— No bank debt— Sale of non‐core assets provides cash at year end— Debt/total capitalization: 25%

• Long‐term time horizon

Cimarex Value Proposition

4

Page 5: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

5

5

0.6x 0.6x0.7x

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

2012 2013 2014

Oil NGL Gas Net Debt/EBITDA

357

444

348

425705

869

0

250

500

750

1,000

2013 2014 2015E

Oil & NGL Natural Gas

+3‐8%895‐935

Daily Production(MMcfe)

Proved Reserves(Bcfe)

Solid Growth and Financial Discipline

2,2592,497

3,132+25%

Page 6: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

6

Realized Prices: $64.94/Bbl; $3.95/Mcf; $25.32/Bbl (NGL)

Product and Regional Diversity – 4Q 2014

RevenueMix Area

Daily Production: 950 MMcfe

Page 7: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

7

2015 E&D Investment PlanTotal Capital: $0.9‐$1.1 billion

$312 million$350 million

Drilling & Completion

Mid‐ContinentPermian

Drilling & Completion 76%

Drilling & Completion 76%

Page 8: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

8

• Multiple projects in multiple zones— Wolfcamp shale (oil & gas)— Bone Spring sands (oil)— Avalon Shale (oil window)

• 2015 Focus— Wolfcamp Long Laterals

• Culberson Wolfcamp A & D

— Reeves County acreage obligations

— White City Bone Spring

Permian Basin Region

Page 9: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

9

• ~235,000 net acres in the fairway

• Multiple Wolfcamp Targets— Culberson/White City Area

• 100,000+ net acres• Wolfcamp A, C & D• JDA with Chevron

— Reeves County • 80,000 net acres• Wolfcamp A & B/C

— Ward County• 38,000 net acres• Wolfcamp A & B/C

Delaware Basin Wolfcamp Fairway

Page 10: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

10

• 100,000+ net acres• 2013 main objectives— Drilling to hold acreage— Wolfcamp C & D

• Two rigs; ~20 wells• 41 wells to date; 30‐day

average IP of 6.5 MMcfe/d• Product mix of 45% gas;

26% oil; 29% NGL

— Upsize frac stages• First 20‐stage test has 30‐day

average IP of 8.4 MMcfe/d

— Testing Wolfcamp A — Experiment with long laterals— Stacked lateral test— Design downspacing pilot

• 100,000 net acres• 2015 focus on long laterals in

Wolfcamp A & D• Five new Wolfcamp D long

laterals have ave. 30‐day peak IP 2,236 BOE/d (26% oil; 45% gas)

• First Wolfcamp A long lateral has ave. 30‐day peak IP of 1,491 BOE/d (50% oil; 30 % gas)— 7,500 feet; 30‐stage completion— 25% uplift to 5,000 foot test

• Oil gathering by 4Q15— Fee‐based agreement — Improve realizations

• $25mm infrastructure spend in 2015

Culberson Focus Area Wolfcamp

Page 11: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

11

Shallow Decline of Upsized Fracs

(BOE/d)

Performance of Key Culberson County Wolfcamp Wells

1,365

2,450

1,500

2,500

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,00030‐day IP

Days 30‐60

Days 60‐90

90 day average1,0951,250

400

800

1,200

1,600

Wolfcamp D Wolfcamp A

Twenty Grand5,000 ft. lateral

First Year Cum:0.6 Bcf (wet gas)

135 Mbbls

Tim Tam5,000 ft. lateral

First Year Cum:1.0 Bcf (wet gas)

89 Mbbls

Gallant Fox10,000 ft. lateral

First Year Cum:2.1 Bcf (wet gas)

149 Mbbls

Page 12: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

12

Culberson County Focus Area: Wolfcamp D Type Curves

12

Lower well costs = partial offset to oil price declines

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0 12 24 36 48

Months

10,000 ft. lateral; 43 stages 5,000 ft. lateral; 20 stages

BOE/day

5,000 ft. Lateral 10,000 ft. LateralPrevious Go‐Forward Previous Go‐Forward

Well Cost ($MM) $9.0 $7.6 $13.5 $11.9BT IRR 32% 49% 56% 73%NPV10 ($MM) $4.3 $5.7 $12.2 $13.7

Assumptions: Oil ‐ $50/Bbl; Gas ‐ $3.00/Mcf; NGL ‐ $17.50/Bbl (full recovery)

Page 13: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

13

Sensitivity to Crude Oil Prices

13

Culberson County Wolfcamp D

Assumptions: $3.00 gas, NGLs 35% of oil, Full NGL recovery.

Before Tax IRR

52%

73%

99%

133%

33%

49%

68%

90%

$40 $50 $60 $70

Wolfcamp D ‐ 10,000 ft. lateral; 43 stages Wolfcamp D ‐ 5,000 ft. lateral; 20 stages

Realized Oil Price ($/Bbl)

IRR at strip dated 2/16/15

Page 14: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

14

Reeves County • Weather & pipeline issues cause

delays in reporting new long lateral results including fourth pilot

• 2015 focus on meeting acreage obligations— Spud eight wells; $70mm

• $5mm midstream investment in 2015

Ward County• Minimal lease expirations in

2015

Reeves & Ward Counties

14

Page 15: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

15

• Completion upsized to 15 stages from nine

• 64% increase in cum production over 180 days

• 90 locations identified• HPB acreage; infrastructure in

place

White City Second Bone Spring

64% Increase

Cumulative Production (MBOE/d)

Focus Area

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0 30 60 90 120 150 180

Upsized Completion (15 stages) Original Completion (9 stages)

Page 16: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

16

• E&D capex of $312mm • Cana Core capex of

~$179mm— Includes seven section infill

program

• 128,000 net prospective Woodford acres (86%HBP)

Mid‐Continent Highlights

Operated WellNon‐operated Well

Cana‐Woodford Activity Map

Golden Section

Hartz Section

2015 Infill

$8.2$7.0

$3

$4

$5

$6

$7

$8

$9

4Q14 2015E

‐15%

Cana‐Woodford Well Cost (MM)

Page 17: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

17

17

Upsized Fracs Show Sustained Production Strength

(MMcfe/d)Golden Section

Hartz Section

8.78.210.2

9.2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Golden Hartz

30‐day IP

Days 30‐60

Days 60‐90

90 day average

Page 18: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

18

• First six wells had average 30‐day peak IP of 10.2 MMcfe/d— Updip: 49% oil, 27% NGL, 24%

gas— Downdip: 16% oil, 30% NGL,

54% gas

• 115,000 net prospective Meramec acres— Results to‐date have de‐risked

70,000 net acres

Mid‐Continent: Meramec is an Exciting New Opportunity

Updip

Downdip

Page 19: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

19

Mid‐Continent Focus: Cana‐Woodford and Meramec

19

Culberson Area100,000 net acres

Reeves County80,000 net acres

Ward County38,000 net acres

IIndicates producing zone.

MMcfe/day

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 12 24 36 48

Months

Meramec ‐ 5,000 ft. lateral; 23 stages Woodford ‐ 5,000 ft. lateral; 23 stages (Row 4 infill well)

Cana Infill MeramecWell Cost ($MM) $7.0 $7.3BTAX IRR 39% 59%NPV10 ($MM) $5.4 $7.0Oil Yield (bbl/MMcf) 17 68

Assumptions: Oil ‐ $50/Bbl; Gas ‐ $3.00/Mcf; NGL ‐ $17.50/Bbl (full recovery)

Page 20: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

20

Mid‐Continent Economics: Cana‐Woodford & Meramec

20

Culberson Area100,000 net acres

Reeves County80,000 net acres

Ward County38,000 net acres

IIndicates producing zone.

40%

59%

78%

102%

31%

39%

49%

61%

$40 $50 $60 $70

Crude Oil ($/Bbl)*

Meramec ‐ 5,000 ft. lateral; 23 stages Woodford ‐ 5,000 ft. lateral; 23 stages (Row 4 infill well)

BTAX IRR

Economic Sensitivity to Crude Oil Prices

*Realized prices. Assumes $3.00 gas, NGLs 35% of Crude Oil

IRR at strip dated 2/16/15

Page 21: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

21

• Diverse portfolio with strong returns

—Multiple Delaware Basin opportunities — Cana‐Woodford infill & re‐delineation— Emerging Meramec play— Continuous generation of ideas

• Strong balance sheet

— Sale of non‐core assets provides cash at year end

• Near‐term focus on maintaining financial position

• Long track record of profitable growth

Well Positioned for 2015 and beyond

21

Page 22: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

22

Appendix

22

Page 23: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

23

23

MMcfe/day

Cana‐Woodford Production

161 156

184

215 229

216 217 226

255

310

406

384

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Q1 12 Q2 12 Q3 12 Q4 12 Q1 13 Q2 13 Q3 13 Q4 13 Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14

Gas NGL Oil

Page 24: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

24

24

Permian Production Growth

40 41

46 49

46

53

59

55 58

6668

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Q1 12 Q2 12 Q3 12 Q4 12 Q1 13 Q2 13 Q3 13 Q4 13 Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14

Oil NGL Gas

MBOE/day

Page 25: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

25

2015 Guidance

25

First Quarter Full‐YearProduction*Total Equivalent (Mmcfe/d) 920‐940 895‐935

% Liquids 52% 52%

Expenses ($/Mcfe):Production $1.07 ‐ $1.17Transportation, processing & other 0.58 ‐ 0.68

DD&A and ARO accretion* 2.55 ‐ 2.65

General and administrative 0.24 ‐ 0.28

Taxes other than income (% of oil and gas revenue)

5.3 ‐ 5.7%

*Excludes the impact of any ceiling test write‐downs

Capital Expenditures $0.9 ‐ $1.1 billion

2015 Production, Unit Expense and Capital Guidance

Page 26: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

26

• Invested $337mm in 2014 to drill 81 gross (44 net) wells

• Three areas■ New Mexico 2nd & 3rd Bone

Spring (Eddy & Lea Counties)• 23 operated wells in 2014• 30‐day average peak IP*: 962

BOE/d; 749 bo/d■ Texas 3rd Bone Spring (Ward

County)• 12 operated wells in 2014• 30‐day average peak IP*:

1,022 BOE/d (801 bo/d)■ Culberson County 2nd Bone

Spring• 16 operated wells in 2014• 30‐day average peak IP*:

1,018 BOE/d (594 bo/d)

*Two stream.

Bone Spring Play

.

Page 27: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

27

Thick, Multi‐pay Wolfcamp Section

27

Culberson Area100,000 net acres

Reeves County80,000 net acres

Ward County38,000 net acres

IIndicates producing zone.

Page 28: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

28

Culberson County Wolfcamp Pilots

28

Stacked Lateral Test• Wolfcamp C & D• Two wells• Producing/Evaluating

80‐acre Spacing Pilot• Wolfcamp D• Four wells• Producing/Evaluating

Page 29: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

29

29

80‐acre Spacing Pilot• Wolfcamp A• Four wells• Producing/Evaluating

Stacked/Staggered Spacing Pilot• Wolfcamp A• Six wells• Flowing Back

Reeves County Wolfcamp Pilots

Page 30: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

30

Upsized Wolfcamp Frac

Old Frac Design:

5,000‐foot lateral; 12 stages; 4mm lbs of sand

5,000‐foot lateral; 20 stages; 6mm lbs of sand

New Frac Design:

Page 31: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

31

Non‐GAAP Reconciliation

31

($ in Millions) 2012 2013 2014

Net income (loss) 354$ 565$ 507$

Income tax expense (benefit) 207 329 299

Interest expense, net of capitalized 14 23 37

DD&A and ARO accretion 527 624 816

EBITDA 1,102 1,541 1,659

Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

Page 32: CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015 · CSFB Energy Summit February 25, 2015. 2 Forward‐looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward‐looking statements

32

Non‐GAAP Reconciliation

32

2014 2013

Net cash provided by operating activities $ 1,619 $ 1,324

Change in operating assets

and liabilities 15 64

Adjusted cash flow from operations $ 1,634 $ 1,388

(in millions)

Twelve months

Ended December 31,

Debt/Cap Calculation

2014

Proved Reserves adds (Bcfe)

Revisions of previous estimates 104.9

Extensions & discoveries [C] 813.9

Purchase of reserves 133.6

Total adds [A] 1,052.4

Total capital $MM [B] 2,131$

All-sources F&D ($/Mcfe) [B]/[A] 2.02$

Drilling (excl. revisions) F&D ($/Mcfe) [B]/[C] 2.62$

Reconciliation of cash flow from operations

Finding & development (F&D) cost

2014

Long-term debt $ 1,500

Stockholders' Equity 4,501

Total capitalization $ 6,001

Long-term debt/total capitalization 25%

December 31,

(in millions)

Net Debt/EBITDA Calculation

Twelve months

Ended December 31,

2012 2013 2014

Long-term debt 750 924 1,500

Cash & cash equivalents 70 5 406

Net Debt 680 919 1,094

EBITDA 1,102 1,541 1,659

Net Debt/EBITDA 0.6x 0.6x 0.7x