crossref: improving scholarly communications

114
Improving Scholarly Communication Kirsty Meddings, CrossRef [email protected] The First Congress of Asia Pacic Association of Medical Journal Editors 28th August 2011 Friday, 2 September 2011

Upload: crossref

Post on 12-May-2015

1.072 views

Category:

Technology


4 download

DESCRIPTION

A presentation to the First Congress of the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Editors, Seoul, 28th August 2011.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Improving Scholarly Communication

Kirsty Meddings, [email protected]

The First Congress of Asia Paci!c Association of Medical Journal Editors28th August 2011

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 2: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 3: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 4: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Photo: `R4cH3L on Flickr

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 5: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Diomidis Spinellis. 2003. The decay and failures of web references. Commun. ACM 46, 1 (January 2003), 71-77. DOI=10.1145/602421.602422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/602421.602422

Computer scientist Diomidis Spinellis “examined 4,224 URLs in 2,471 computer science articles… and discovered that nearly half of the references could not be accessed within

four years of the publication date. Links become inaccessible as time passes…”

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 6: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Established 1999

AAAS • Academic Press • American Institute of Physics • Association of Computing Machinery • Blackwell • Elsevier

• IEEE • Kluwer Academic • Nature Publishing Group • Oxford University Press • Springer • Wiley

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 7: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Easy, reliable navigation to scholarly content using DOIs

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 8: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

What is a DOI?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 9: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Digital

What is a DOI?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 10: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

DigitalObject

What is a DOI?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 11: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

DigitalObject Identi!er

What is a DOI?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 12: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

9

A DOI is alphanumeric

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 13: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

10

A DOI uniquely identifies content

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 14: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

A DOI provides a persistent and stable link to content

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 15: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Assig

ned

TO

mem

ber

Assigned BY

mem

ber

DOI Components

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 16: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

10.1098/rstl.1665.0001http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/1-22/rstl.1665.0001

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 17: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1665.0001

DOI Directory Pre!x Suffix

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 18: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1665.0001

DOI Directory Pre!x Suffix

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 19: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1665.0001

DOI Directory Pre!x Suffix

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 20: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1665.0001

DOI Directory Pre!x Suffix

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 21: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

User clicks on CrossRef DOI

reference link in Journal A

Tani, N., N. Tomaru, M. Araki, AND K. Ohba. 1996. Genetic diversity and differentiation in populations of Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila) in Japan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1454–1462.[CrossRef]

http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x26-162

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 22: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

User clicks on CrossRef DOI

reference link in Journal A

Tani, N., N. Tomaru, M. Araki, AND K. Ohba. 1996. Genetic diversity and differentiation in populations of Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila) in Japan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1454–1462.[CrossRef]

DOI directory returns

URL

http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x26-162

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 23: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

User clicks on CrossRef DOI

reference link in Journal A

Tani, N., N. Tomaru, M. Araki, AND K. Ohba. 1996. Genetic diversity and differentiation in populations of Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila) in Japan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1454–1462.[CrossRef]

DOI directory returns

URL

User accesses cited article in

Journal B

http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x26-162

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 24: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 25: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Blog Posts

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 26: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Books

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 27: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Enables persistent linking by assigning DOI pre!xes to its members maintaining a database of DOIs, associated

metadata and URLs

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 28: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

DOI = NISO Standard

CrossRef = DOI Registration Agency

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 29: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

DOI = NISO Standard

CrossRef = DOI Registration Agency

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 30: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

DOI = NISO Standard

CrossRef = DOI Registration Agency

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 31: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

provides an organizational foundation for widespread linking

Membership association for cooperative development of a digital linking infrastructure

Business model neutral

Commercial, societies, non-pro!ts, university presses, OA publishers. 66% non-pro!t

One agreement with CrossRef is a linking agreement with all other CrossRef participants

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 32: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Oxford, UK5 StaffBoston, USA

14 Staff

-16 person international Board of Directors-Working Groups & Committees

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 33: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

"CrossRef's goal is to be a trusted collaborative organization with broad

community connections; authoritative and innovative in support of a persistent,

sustainable infrastructure for scholarly communication."

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 34: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Why do publishers join?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 35: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Why do publishers join?

To get persistent IDs and links for their content

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 36: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Why do publishers join?

To get persistent IDs and links for their content

To drive more traffic to their content

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 37: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Why do publishers join?

To get persistent IDs and links for their content

To drive more traffic to their content

To turn their references into hyperlinks

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 38: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Why do publishers join?

To get persistent IDs and links for their content

To drive more traffic to their content

To turn their references into hyperlinks

To add Cited-by links (what cites this article?)

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 39: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Why do publishers join?

To get persistent IDs and links for their content

To drive more traffic to their content

To turn their references into hyperlinks

To add Cited-by links (what cites this article?)

To participate in new collaborative services

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 40: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

3,542 publishers and societies

48,200,000 content items with DOIs

24,870 journals

166,000 books

21,200 conference proceedings

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 41: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 42: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

0

9,400,000

18,800,000

28,200,000

37,600,000

47,000,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20102011

Content Growth

Total CrossRef DOIs

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 43: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Linking 5 centuries of content

Century # of DOIs deposited

17th 1,686

18th 4,200

19th 651,584

20th 20,804,031

21st 13,914,241

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 44: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Linking 5 centuries of content

Century # of DOIs deposited

17th 1,686

18th 4,200

19th 651,584

20th 20,804,031

21st 13,914,241

1665Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 45: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

45 - 55,000,000

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 46: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

CrossRef Member Obligations1.Deposit all current journal articles

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 47: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

CrossRef Member Obligations1.Deposit all current journal articles

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 48: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

CrossRef Member Obligations1.Deposit all current journal articles

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 49: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

CrossRef Member Obligations2. Update metadata and especially URLs

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 50: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

CrossRef Member Obligations3. Implement outbound reference linking

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 51: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

CrossRef Member Obligations4. Do not publicize CrossRef DOIs until links are live

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 52: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

CrossRef Member Obligations4. Resolve DOI con#icts

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 53: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

CrossRef Member Obligations6. Make plans for long term archiving

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 54: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

• Technical: two data centers, backups, disaster recovery plan

• IP and trademarks: ownership of IP of system software and a strong brand

• Sustainable org: good governance, sound business model (surpluses) and Cash Reserve Fund

How to ensure long-term persistence?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 55: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Creating DOIs for content

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 56: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Creating DOIs for content

DOI suffixes should be:

Short

Easily documented

Readily implemented

Opaque/Dumb

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 57: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Creating DOIs for content

DOI suffixes should be:

Short

Easily documented

Readily implemented

Opaque/Dumb

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980420)58:2/33.0.CO;2-N

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 58: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Creating DOIs for content

DOI suffixes should be:

Short

Easily documented

Readily implemented

Opaque/Dumb

10.1002/smj.376

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980420)58:2/33.0.CO;2-N

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 59: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

New DOI display GuidelinesAnnounced 2nd August 2011

doi:10.5555/12345678

http://dx.doi.org10.5555/12345678

change

to

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 60: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 61: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Bene"ts

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 62: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 63: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 64: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Content Negotiation for DOIs

All CrossRef Metadata available in machine-readable format

In accordance with linked data principles

No change for people following DOI links

Machines following DOI links can ask to receive XML metadata instead of the HTML page

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 65: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Fees: Annual Membership

Annual Publishing Revenue Annual Fee

< $1 million $275

$1 million-$5 million $550

$5 million-$10 million $1,650

$10 million-$25 million $3,900

$25 million-$50 million $8,300

$50 million-$100 million $14,000

$100 million-$200 million $22,000

$200 million-$500 million $33,000

>$500 million $50,000

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 66: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

One-Time Deposit Fees

Deposit Type Per-DOI Fee

Current records (2008-2010) $1.00

Book chapters and reference entries ≤ 250 per title $0.25

Book chapters and reference entries > 250 per title $0.15

Backfiles $0.15

Components, data records $.06

Journal Titles free

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 67: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

What is CrossRef Cited-by Linking?

A way to answer the question:“Who’s Citing You?”

• An optional reference linking service of CrossRef

• Additional navigation for your publication web site

• Demonstration to your readers the relevance of your content

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 68: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 69: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 70: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 71: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Cited-by Rules

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 72: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Cited-by Rules• Participation is optional

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 73: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Cited-by Rules• Participation is optional

• Members must deposit references from their current material in order to retrieve Cited-by links.

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 74: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Cited-by Rules• Participation is optional

• Members must deposit references from their current material in order to retrieve Cited-by links.

• Members (or Affiliates acting on their behalf ) can retrieve Cited-by links to display in Members’ primary content.

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 75: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Cited-by Rules• Participation is optional

• Members must deposit references from their current material in order to retrieve Cited-by links.

• Members (or Affiliates acting on their behalf ) can retrieve Cited-by links to display in Members’ primary content.

• Cited-by Linking is not available for secondary publishers.

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 76: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

• 225 publishers participating

• 8.7 million articles with references deposited

• 138 million Cited-by links

• 17.4 million articles with at least one Cited-by link

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 77: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 78: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Services

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 79: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Services

•Cross-publisher reference linking

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 80: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Services

•Cross-publisher reference linking

•Cross-publisher cited-by linking

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 81: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Services

•Cross-publisher reference linking

•Cross-publisher cited-by linking

•Cross-publisher plagiarism screening

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 82: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Services

•Cross-publisher reference linking

•Cross-publisher cited-by linking

•Cross-publisher plagiarism screening

•Cross-publisher content validation

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 83: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Cross-Publisher Plagiarism Screening

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 84: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

243 publishers

29.9 million content items indexed

57,000 titles

20,000+ manuscripts checked each month

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 85: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Documents Checked

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Aug-10

Sep-10

Oct-10

Nov-10

Dec-10

Jan-11

Feb-11

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 86: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 87: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Industry Problems

• The scholarly pre-publication process is largely invisible

• The common belief that the publisher’s job is done on publication of the “!nal” version

• A proliferation of versions of content online that are not stewarded

• Readers don’t know which copy to “trust”

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 88: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

erratumcorrigendum

updatesenhancements

withdrawalsretractions

new editionsFriday, 2 September 2011

Page 89: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

What is CrossMark?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 90: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

A logo that identi!es a publisher-maintained copy of a piece of content

What is CrossMark?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 91: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

A logo that identi!es a publisher-maintained copy of a piece of content

Clicking the logo tells you

What is CrossMark?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 92: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

A logo that identi!es a publisher-maintained copy of a piece of content

Clicking the logo tells you

Whether there have been any updates

What is CrossMark?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 93: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

A logo that identi!es a publisher-maintained copy of a piece of content

Clicking the logo tells you

Whether there have been any updates

If this copy is being maintained by the publisher

What is CrossMark?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 94: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

A logo that identi!es a publisher-maintained copy of a piece of content

Clicking the logo tells you

Whether there have been any updates

If this copy is being maintained by the publisher

Where the publisher-maintained version is

What is CrossMark?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 95: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

A logo that identi!es a publisher-maintained copy of a piece of content

Clicking the logo tells you

Whether there have been any updates

If this copy is being maintained by the publisher

Where the publisher-maintained version is

Other important publication record information

What is CrossMark?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 96: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 97: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 98: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 99: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 100: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 101: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 102: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 103: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 104: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 105: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

What kind of Publication Record information could be available?

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 106: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

What kind of Publication Record information could be available?

Funding disclosures

Con#ict of interest statements

Publication history (submission, revision and accepted dates)

Location of data deposits or registries

Peer review process used

CrossCheck plagiarism screening

License types

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 108: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Conclusions

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 109: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Conclusions

• CrossRef provides infrastructure to enable publishers to enhance their content and services

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 110: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Conclusions

• CrossRef provides infrastructure to enable publishers to enhance their content and services

• CrossRef services drive traffic to publishers content

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 111: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Conclusions

• CrossRef provides infrastructure to enable publishers to enhance their content and services

• CrossRef services drive traffic to publishers content

• CrossRef services enable publishers to highlight the value they add to content

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 112: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Final Thought

• No publisher is an island - collaboration and connection are the keys

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 113: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Thank YouKirsty Meddings

Product [email protected]

Friday, 2 September 2011

Page 114: CrossRef: Improving Scholarly Communications

Friday, 2 September 2011