cross cultural management 2 13

17
VS . NEGOTIATION Case 4 Group 9

Upload: universiti-utara-malaysia

Post on 30-Jan-2015

521 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cross cultural management 2 13

VS.

NEGOTIATION

Case 4Group 9

Page 2: Cross cultural management 2 13

The PRESENTER:

SALWA BINTI ZAIN 206512NABILAH BINTI HAMID 206337FOO CHUIN KHAI 205686 NG CHUN WON 206410

Page 3: Cross cultural management 2 13

INTRODUCTION

Page 4: Cross cultural management 2 13

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

1. Mr Stefan expect to have the meeting on that day he arrived but the marketing representatives informed that meeting was postponed two days later.

Page 5: Cross cultural management 2 13

2. although he already informed the representative that he is well prepared and ready for the meeting but the representative reluctant to informed on his behalf.

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

Page 6: Cross cultural management 2 13

3. During their first meeting , there still no outcome and agreements was made , and the Vice President suggest for another meeting for

the next day .

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

Page 7: Cross cultural management 2 13

COMPARISON BETWEEN US CULTURE AND MEXICO CULTURE

COMMUNICATION STYLE TIMES

UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE POWER DISTANCE

Page 8: Cross cultural management 2 13

COMMUNICATION STYLEUNITED STATES

Low-context culture.

Direct(explicit).

Straight forward so implies less chance of misunderstanding particularly.

Short-term relationship.

MEXICOHigh-context culture.

Indirect(implicit).

Non-verbal communication.

High commitment to long-term relationship.

Page 9: Cross cultural management 2 13

TIMESUNITED STATES

Monochronic.

very concerned about the time.

Thinking that taking time

to build relationship is waste of time and nothing meaningless.

Hasty, rushed and pushy.

MEXICO Polychronic.

Have manaña attitude (too relaxed and always delays doing things).

Take time to trust on relationship.

Lack a sufficient sense of urgency.

Page 10: Cross cultural management 2 13

UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCEUNITED STATES

Low uncertainty avoidance.

Risk taker.

Try to minimize rule as possible.

Comfortable with uncertainty.

MEXICO High uncertainty avoidance.

Risk avoidance.

Prefer formal rule.

Uncomfortable with uncertainty( want things clear, concise and consistent).

Page 11: Cross cultural management 2 13

POWER DISTANCE

UNITED STATES

Low power distance.

Can make their own decision.

Democratic.

MEXICO

High power distance.

Decisions finalized by top management.

Autocratic.

Page 12: Cross cultural management 2 13

INDIVIDUALISM VS COLLECTIVISMUNITED STATES

Individualism.

Making decision based on individuals needs.

Look after themselves only.

MEXICO

Collectivism

Decision-making based on what is best for group.

Long-term commitment to the member group.

Page 13: Cross cultural management 2 13

SUGGESTIONS

Stefan should follow the arrangement of the marketing representative of the Mexico who have the time orientation which is synchronic that starts the meeting two days later.

1.0 Stefan should understand the difference of time dimensions between USA and Mexico.

Page 14: Cross cultural management 2 13

2.0 Stefan should get to know more about the context cultures of Mexico which is different with his country.

Stefan should understand that Mexico is high context culture country and rest after the long trip and have a chance to see more of the local sights and enjoy their hospitality.

SUGGESTIONS

Page 15: Cross cultural management 2 13

3.0 Stefan should find a intermediary to smoothen the business.

 Third party who is origin from USA and currently stay in Mexico for a period of time can smoothen the business between Stefan and Mexican.

SUGGESTIONS

Page 16: Cross cultural management 2 13

CONCLUSION

• We need to recognize, understand and respect the cultural differences between countries to avoid misunderstanding

• Cultural differences are important to identify and to provide us with a sense of belonging

Page 17: Cross cultural management 2 13

THE END