critical thinking unit 1 question b burning times
DESCRIPTION
Part of a set of free teaching resources called "Encouraging Critical Thinking Online" by Meriel Patrick of Oxford University, written for the Intute Virtual Training SuiteTRANSCRIPT
Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
Unit 1
Checking Facts and
Gathering Opinions
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many
people died as a resultbull Find a selection of websites that
address this question
bull Record your search strategy and what you find on the worksheet
bull Comment on any notable features of the sites or answers you discover
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull The phrase refers to the persecution of people accused of witchcraft in the early modern period (ca 1450-1700)ndash A Google search for defineldquoBurning
Timesrdquo produces a range of definitions including this glossary
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull Howeverndash In England and America most people
convicted of witchcraft were hangedndash In Scotland and on the continent
burning was more common but victims were rarely burnt alive ndash they were usually executed by other means first
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull Many academics prefer to avoid the termndash Instead more neutral terms such as
lsquoearly modern persecution of witchesrsquo or lsquowitch huntsrsquo are preferred
ndash But the term is still in frequent use in the neo-Pagan community
How many people died as a result
bull Some popular estimates are as high as nine million
bull Most scholarly investigations put the figure at a few tens of thousandsndash Many websites reflect the scholarly
research but there are also sites which still give inflated figures
Example websites giving high estimates
bull The website Witch Prickers suggests ldquoa maximum estimate of 13 million dead and a minimum estimate of 4 millionrdquo
bull Wiccan Terms and Definitions and the Wiccan Dictionary both suggest nine million
Example websites giving lower estimates
bull Religious Toleranceorg suggests between 50000 and 100000
bull The article lsquoFalsehoods of the Burning Timesrsquo suggests 60000
bull Wicca For the Rest of Us suggests between 40000 and 100000
Compare and contrast
bull Look at the example sites and considerndash Other than in the figures they give
how do these sites differ
ndash Who wrote these sites What are their credentials
ndash Are sourcesreferences given
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many
people died as a resultbull Find a selection of websites that
address this question
bull Record your search strategy and what you find on the worksheet
bull Comment on any notable features of the sites or answers you discover
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull The phrase refers to the persecution of people accused of witchcraft in the early modern period (ca 1450-1700)ndash A Google search for defineldquoBurning
Timesrdquo produces a range of definitions including this glossary
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull Howeverndash In England and America most people
convicted of witchcraft were hangedndash In Scotland and on the continent
burning was more common but victims were rarely burnt alive ndash they were usually executed by other means first
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull Many academics prefer to avoid the termndash Instead more neutral terms such as
lsquoearly modern persecution of witchesrsquo or lsquowitch huntsrsquo are preferred
ndash But the term is still in frequent use in the neo-Pagan community
How many people died as a result
bull Some popular estimates are as high as nine million
bull Most scholarly investigations put the figure at a few tens of thousandsndash Many websites reflect the scholarly
research but there are also sites which still give inflated figures
Example websites giving high estimates
bull The website Witch Prickers suggests ldquoa maximum estimate of 13 million dead and a minimum estimate of 4 millionrdquo
bull Wiccan Terms and Definitions and the Wiccan Dictionary both suggest nine million
Example websites giving lower estimates
bull Religious Toleranceorg suggests between 50000 and 100000
bull The article lsquoFalsehoods of the Burning Timesrsquo suggests 60000
bull Wicca For the Rest of Us suggests between 40000 and 100000
Compare and contrast
bull Look at the example sites and considerndash Other than in the figures they give
how do these sites differ
ndash Who wrote these sites What are their credentials
ndash Are sourcesreferences given
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull The phrase refers to the persecution of people accused of witchcraft in the early modern period (ca 1450-1700)ndash A Google search for defineldquoBurning
Timesrdquo produces a range of definitions including this glossary
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull Howeverndash In England and America most people
convicted of witchcraft were hangedndash In Scotland and on the continent
burning was more common but victims were rarely burnt alive ndash they were usually executed by other means first
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull Many academics prefer to avoid the termndash Instead more neutral terms such as
lsquoearly modern persecution of witchesrsquo or lsquowitch huntsrsquo are preferred
ndash But the term is still in frequent use in the neo-Pagan community
How many people died as a result
bull Some popular estimates are as high as nine million
bull Most scholarly investigations put the figure at a few tens of thousandsndash Many websites reflect the scholarly
research but there are also sites which still give inflated figures
Example websites giving high estimates
bull The website Witch Prickers suggests ldquoa maximum estimate of 13 million dead and a minimum estimate of 4 millionrdquo
bull Wiccan Terms and Definitions and the Wiccan Dictionary both suggest nine million
Example websites giving lower estimates
bull Religious Toleranceorg suggests between 50000 and 100000
bull The article lsquoFalsehoods of the Burning Timesrsquo suggests 60000
bull Wicca For the Rest of Us suggests between 40000 and 100000
Compare and contrast
bull Look at the example sites and considerndash Other than in the figures they give
how do these sites differ
ndash Who wrote these sites What are their credentials
ndash Are sourcesreferences given
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull Howeverndash In England and America most people
convicted of witchcraft were hangedndash In Scotland and on the continent
burning was more common but victims were rarely burnt alive ndash they were usually executed by other means first
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull Many academics prefer to avoid the termndash Instead more neutral terms such as
lsquoearly modern persecution of witchesrsquo or lsquowitch huntsrsquo are preferred
ndash But the term is still in frequent use in the neo-Pagan community
How many people died as a result
bull Some popular estimates are as high as nine million
bull Most scholarly investigations put the figure at a few tens of thousandsndash Many websites reflect the scholarly
research but there are also sites which still give inflated figures
Example websites giving high estimates
bull The website Witch Prickers suggests ldquoa maximum estimate of 13 million dead and a minimum estimate of 4 millionrdquo
bull Wiccan Terms and Definitions and the Wiccan Dictionary both suggest nine million
Example websites giving lower estimates
bull Religious Toleranceorg suggests between 50000 and 100000
bull The article lsquoFalsehoods of the Burning Timesrsquo suggests 60000
bull Wicca For the Rest of Us suggests between 40000 and 100000
Compare and contrast
bull Look at the example sites and considerndash Other than in the figures they give
how do these sites differ
ndash Who wrote these sites What are their credentials
ndash Are sourcesreferences given
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
bull Many academics prefer to avoid the termndash Instead more neutral terms such as
lsquoearly modern persecution of witchesrsquo or lsquowitch huntsrsquo are preferred
ndash But the term is still in frequent use in the neo-Pagan community
How many people died as a result
bull Some popular estimates are as high as nine million
bull Most scholarly investigations put the figure at a few tens of thousandsndash Many websites reflect the scholarly
research but there are also sites which still give inflated figures
Example websites giving high estimates
bull The website Witch Prickers suggests ldquoa maximum estimate of 13 million dead and a minimum estimate of 4 millionrdquo
bull Wiccan Terms and Definitions and the Wiccan Dictionary both suggest nine million
Example websites giving lower estimates
bull Religious Toleranceorg suggests between 50000 and 100000
bull The article lsquoFalsehoods of the Burning Timesrsquo suggests 60000
bull Wicca For the Rest of Us suggests between 40000 and 100000
Compare and contrast
bull Look at the example sites and considerndash Other than in the figures they give
how do these sites differ
ndash Who wrote these sites What are their credentials
ndash Are sourcesreferences given
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
How many people died as a result
bull Some popular estimates are as high as nine million
bull Most scholarly investigations put the figure at a few tens of thousandsndash Many websites reflect the scholarly
research but there are also sites which still give inflated figures
Example websites giving high estimates
bull The website Witch Prickers suggests ldquoa maximum estimate of 13 million dead and a minimum estimate of 4 millionrdquo
bull Wiccan Terms and Definitions and the Wiccan Dictionary both suggest nine million
Example websites giving lower estimates
bull Religious Toleranceorg suggests between 50000 and 100000
bull The article lsquoFalsehoods of the Burning Timesrsquo suggests 60000
bull Wicca For the Rest of Us suggests between 40000 and 100000
Compare and contrast
bull Look at the example sites and considerndash Other than in the figures they give
how do these sites differ
ndash Who wrote these sites What are their credentials
ndash Are sourcesreferences given
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Example websites giving high estimates
bull The website Witch Prickers suggests ldquoa maximum estimate of 13 million dead and a minimum estimate of 4 millionrdquo
bull Wiccan Terms and Definitions and the Wiccan Dictionary both suggest nine million
Example websites giving lower estimates
bull Religious Toleranceorg suggests between 50000 and 100000
bull The article lsquoFalsehoods of the Burning Timesrsquo suggests 60000
bull Wicca For the Rest of Us suggests between 40000 and 100000
Compare and contrast
bull Look at the example sites and considerndash Other than in the figures they give
how do these sites differ
ndash Who wrote these sites What are their credentials
ndash Are sourcesreferences given
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Example websites giving lower estimates
bull Religious Toleranceorg suggests between 50000 and 100000
bull The article lsquoFalsehoods of the Burning Timesrsquo suggests 60000
bull Wicca For the Rest of Us suggests between 40000 and 100000
Compare and contrast
bull Look at the example sites and considerndash Other than in the figures they give
how do these sites differ
ndash Who wrote these sites What are their credentials
ndash Are sourcesreferences given
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Compare and contrast
bull Look at the example sites and considerndash Other than in the figures they give
how do these sites differ
ndash Who wrote these sites What are their credentials
ndash Are sourcesreferences given
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Compare and contrast
bull There is a significant difference in tonendash Articles quoting higher numbers often
use more emotive language
ndash Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched as attempts to set the record straight
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Compare and contrast
bull There may also be a marked difference in the picture paintedndash Sites giving higher numbers are more
likely to identify the victims as Pagans or followers of lsquothe Old Religionrsquo
ndash The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Compare and contrast
bull However sites giving lower estimates are not immune from errorndash For example Religious Toleranceorg
implies that alleged witches were routinely burned alive
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Compare and contrast
bull Sites with lower estimates more frequently give information about the authorndash From Religious Toleranceorg
ndash From Wicca For the Rest of Us
bull But this isnrsquot universally the case
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Compare and contrast
bull Sites on this topic are frequently written by people with a keen personal interest rather than an academic background in the area
bull The occasional source is listed but full references are rarely given
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Alternative search strategies
bull Search using terms favoured by academics ndash Phrases like ldquowitch huntrdquo and ldquo
witch crazerdquo produce slightly different results
ndash Some more academic sites ndash eg The Witch Hunts by Prof Brian A Pavlac ndash but still a fairly high proportion of non-scholarly material
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Alternative search strategies
bull Use more specific search termsndash Phrases like ldquowitch hunt scholarshiprdquo
or ldquowitch hunt scholarly researchrdquo produce some useful hits
ndash But not all the material is helpful some is irrelevant some only suited to in-depth research and some requires subscription
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Alternative search strategies
bull Consult a gatewayndash An academic gateway site such as
Intute offers hand-selected resourcesndash Searches give fewer results but
theyrsquore more likely to be what yoursquore looking for
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Alternative search strategies
bull Searching Intute for ldquoBurning Timesrdquo lsquowitch huntrsquo or lsquowitch crazersquo gives a small number of (mostly) relevant results
bull A description of each site aids the process of determining whatrsquos most useful
bull Also offered are additional features such as Limelight articles
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Alternative search strategies
bull The hits include Jenny Gibbonsrsquos informative essay lsquoRecent Developments in the Study of the Great European Witch Huntrsquo
bull Gives the authorrsquos credentials and mentions her sources (though still lacks detailed references)
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Summary - key things to note
bull Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
bull Itrsquos useful to consult a variety of sources
bull Checking where the information given is drawn from is also wise
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull There may be real uncertainty about the answer
bull Authorities may disagree
bull There may be multiple ways of interpreting a question
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
bull Some sources may be more up to date than others
bull Answers may vary in precision
bull Some sources may simply be wrong
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Who is the authorndash An individual or an institutionndash What are the authorrsquos credentials
bull Is this a scholarly resource or a more informal one
bull How up to date is this source
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of this sourcendash Does it include information I know to
be falsendash Does it contradict itself or use poor
reasoningndash Is it biased towards a particular view
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Questions to ask when assessing sources
bull Is the information provided confirmed by other sourcesndash Are references providedndash Do other websites agree (A major
advantage of the Web is that many sources can be compared quickly and easily)
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
Remember the three Ws
bull WHO wrote this site ndash Is the author a trustworthy source
bull WHEN was it written ndash Is it up to date
bull WHY was it writtenndash Does the author have an axe to grind
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-
This slideshow is part of
Encouraging Critical Thinking Onlinea set of free teaching resources
designed to develop studentsrsquo analytic abilities
using the Web as source material
For the full set please visit Intute Training
httpwwwintuteacuktraining
- Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo How many people died as a result
- When and what were the lsquoBurning Timesrsquo
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- How many people died as a result
- Example websites giving high estimates
- Example websites giving lower estimates
- Compare and contrast
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Alternative search strategies
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Summary - key things to note
- Why might we find conflicting answers to a question
- Slide 22
- Questions to ask when assessing sources
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Remember the three Ws
-