critical missions… proven solutions compas comparison & awareness of situations dr jean-pierre...
TRANSCRIPT
Critical missions… proven solutions
COMPASCOMParison & Awareness
of Situations
Dr Jean-Pierre FAYEVizCOP WS, Toronto
14-17 September 2004
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 2
A Multi-Level COP Concept
French COP Concept
Integrate various picture from Tactical level up to strategical level
Command tool supporting Knowledge base, planning decision & C2 process
All relevant information: past, current and future
US COP Joint Vision 2020
Knowleged based process (Fires, ISR, Logistics & Manœuvre) for decision making
Not only CINC, CJTF, Component commander, but also real-time view of the battle space
A common vision of multi-level COP concept
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 3
Concept demonstration at JWID
The Joint Warfare Interoperability Demonstration (JWID) is a annual event that enables Command staff users to investigate C4I solution enhancing coalition interoperability.
JWID’01 French COP Objective
Integrate various picture from Tactical level up to strategical level
JWID’04 COMPAS demonstrator Objective
Command tool supporting Knowledge base, planning decision & C2 process
All relevant information: past, current and future
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 4
FR Distributed COP (JWID ’01)
LCC JFACCMCC
ACOM SCCOASICF
CJTF
SICA
Great Falls Kershaw
Hartsville
Beenettsville ElizabethtownLumberton
Dillon
CamdenBishopville
COLUMBIA
Sumter
Manning
Darlington
FLORENCE
Lake City
WhitevilleChadbourn
MullinsMarion
Tabor City
Loris
HemingwayMyrtle Beach
St. Matthews
Orangeburg
Moncks Corner
Summerville
Walterboro
Ridgeland
Beaufort
Kingstree
St. Stephens
CHARLESTON
Pawleys IslandGeorgetown
JOINT LECLERC TASK FORCE
XXXXX
AWACS1
I
7TH INFANTERY BATALION
II
1ST TRANSPORT COMPANY
I
CHARLES DE GAULLE
TF
AIR GROUP
EMERAUDE
509TH AIRBORNE BRIGADE
X
94TH ROCKET ARTILLERY BDE (SCUD)
X
KS DOCKSIDE
KS SMITH
KS WINSTON
DAY-5
L-3
L-4
L-6
L-7
L-8
M-10
M-11
M-15
M-18
M-19
DAY 5 : LAND ATTACK
Prospective PictureSituation Awareness
(mock-up)
Reference PictureEstablished by the CJTF
(SITOPS)
Initial PictureReal Time & Data Link
(FLEURUS)
Web Portal
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 5
JWID’04 COMPAS demonstration
ORBAT
TOPFAS
OP Plan
PLANNING
Op Plan
Current Situation(simulations)
Current Situation(simulations)
ReferenceCOP
COMPAS(Prospective)
DecisionalCOP
Current Situation(simulations)
Current Situation(simulations)
Current Situation(simulations)
Current Situation(simulations)
RawCOP
FilteringCJTF
FilteringCJTF
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 6
Demonstrated COMPAS Capabilities
OPLAN data base import from TOPFASOrdre of Battle (ORBAT)Task to Troop allocationOverlays (Areas of Responsibility, Course Of Action) Initial unit positions
Land & Maritime situation import OWNSITREP, ENSITREPNAVSITSUM, MARITSUMTest trials: NATO (LCC/J3, MCC), GE, IT, NO, RO, TU, US
Situation Awareness disseminationPlanned Course Of Action & Current Manoeuvre ComparisonHistorical MouvementCROP dissemination through Web portal
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 75
EUCOM/CTF Scenario ContextEUCOM/CTF Scenario Context
• Simulated USEUCOM Theater (SE Africa).
• Two hostile nations generate conventional subversion/invasion threat against two regional friendly nations.
• Hostile nations also plan/support/execute unconventional attacks inside the Continental US.
• Friendly nations ask, and receive, UN, US and NATO support to defend against hostile nations’ aggression.
• US-led CTF defends against regional aggression.
• USNORTHCOM and USEUCOM cooperate with mutual Intel and operations.
CTF
Tallobland
Caroline
Lumbia
Maykan
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 820
Day 4 (C+10): CTF ThemesDay 4 (C+10): CTF Themes
•Allies push I-95-corridor invading forces towards borders
•Allies initiate western attack up I-26 towards Columbia
•CFMCC flanks eastern Caroline forces with an amphibious attack
•Allies raid western Caroline Terrorist training camps
•CFACC provides CAS for forward land forces, interdicts Caroline and Maykan invading forces, strikes TBM hidesCCTF
Charles Ocean
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 9
French Course of ActionUsing TOPFAS
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 10
TOPFAS database replicationUsing COMPAS
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 11
AdatP-3 MessagesExchanges
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 12
ReferencePicture
Using TDS
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 13
CoA/CROP Comparison
Using COMPAS
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 14
HistoricalMouvements
Using COMPAS
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 15
Lesson Learned
OPLAN data base import from TOPFAS Need for CoA updates (Blue and Red Forces position and CoA updates) A gap exist between an OPLAN and a scenario for simulation Need for Task indicators
Lack of criteria of success Poor information to correlate with the CROP
Land & Maritime situation import Lack of unit identification in AdatP-3 message sent
Difficulty to establish a comprehensive situation awareness CoA reliability
Situation Awareness dissemination Easy Screen shot exchange Limited Data exchange for end-user exploitation
Operational interest for COMPAS Red CoA comprehension Support for CJTF CAX exercise (Current use)
9779PT0028 – 31/07/2002 16
Recommendations
Need for a set of indicators to control planning execution Based on AdatP-3 data set or C2IEDM Data Model
Design specifically for each task
Define task status symbology Exemple for targeting: type and status of target, existing document, …
CoA simulation requires appropriate scenario editor Scenario interpretation of operational tasks
ISTAR operations required a real-time COP Air & Ground Tracks,
Mission reassignment capabilities