critical design review - spacegrant.colorado.edu 2013/teams...• be sure to place all these files,...

89
2013 CDR GASP Critical Design Review Johns Hopkins and University of Maryland Brianna Brassard, Marie Hepfer, Nick Lybarger, Chris Mogni, Krysti Papadopoulos, Lauren Powers, Corrie Russell, Kristy Weber, Mazi Wallace 11/12/2012 1

Upload: buituong

Post on 20-Jun-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

2013 CDR

GASP Critical Design Review

Johns Hopkins and University of Maryland Brianna Brassard, Marie Hepfer, Nick Lybarger, Chris Mogni, Krysti Papadopoulos,

Lauren Powers, Corrie Russell, Kristy Weber, Mazi Wallace

11/12/2012

1

2013 CDR

CDR Delieverables

•  In addition to this presentation, each school must include the following by December 10th

•  Mechanical drawings in pdf format •  Electrical schematics in pdf format •  Signed copies of the Power and Telemetry ICDs in pdf

format •  Completed Power Budget in xls format •  Completed Pin Assignments in xls format •  Completed Timer Event matrix in xls format •  Be sure to place all these files, including ppt

presentation in your DropBox Pony Express folder by COB on December 10, 2012

2

2013 CDR

Purpose of CDR

•  Confirm that: –  Design is mature enough to move into the

fabrication phase –  Final analysis on systems that weren’t prototyped or

needed further analysis is complete and accurate –  Results of prototyping suggest the system will meet

project requirements –  Manufacturing plan is in place –  Testing plan is in place and sufficient to ensure

system functionality and performance in-flight –  Project meets requirements of RockSat-X user’s

guide –  The project is on track to be completed on time and

within budget

3

2013 CDR

CDR Presentation Outline

4

• Section 1: Mission Overview • Section 2: Design Description • Section 3: Subsystem Design • Section 4: Prototyping/Analysis • Section 5: Manufacturing Plan • Section 6: Testing Plan • Section 7: User Guide Compliance • Section 8: Project Management Plan

2013 CDR

1.0 Mission Overview Name of Presenter

5

2013 PDR

Mission Overview: Mission Statement

• Primary Objective I: Measure Electron Density in the E region (90-120km) • Primary Objective II: Test water-tight dust collection mechanism. Dust will be collected with SiO2 aerogel samples. • Secondary Objective I: Use sensors to capture data about the flight

8

2013 PDR

Mission Overview: Mission Statement

• Who will this benefit/what will your data be used for?

– Increase understanding of electron density of E-region – Test novel technique for measuring electron density of E-region – Container provides preliminary test for future JHU team experiments with Aerogels

10

2013 PDR

Mission Overview: Theory and Concepts

• Ionosphere is dispersive • Therefore, EM waves travelling along same path at different frequencies travel at different velocities • Dual frequency GPS signals return from satellite at different times • This is called a phase difference • Phase difference ~ TEC

– TEC: Total Electron Content • Electron density profile calculated by relation:

N(x, y, z, t) ~ dTEC/dt

13

GPS

2013 PDR

Mission Overview: Theory and Concepts

• What other research has been performed in the past? – Dual Frequency GPS flown on many previous space missions – Electron density measured by interferometry, radio occultations, etc in past

• Measurement by phase differences with DF-GPS is a novel technique

14

2013 PDR

Mission Overview: Theory and Concepts

• Aerogels have been used on the Star Dust mission to collect interstellar particles • Possibility of studying particle composition and other properties of upper atmosphere using aerogels • Sounding rocket missions with aerogels have been unsuccessful due to water contamination • Small quantities of water will dissolve aerogels • Proper containment and collection system necessary for any successful scientific mission • We will use SiO2 aerogels with density in the range of 90-100 kg/m^3

15

Aerogels

2013 PDR

Mission Overview: Theory and Concepts

• Research on dust collection in space has been ongoing since the 1960s • Recent papers have documented how aerogels can be used to collect dust particles

• Must put aerogel into the streamline to capture particles head on • Streamline is the curve in which the particle velocity vectors are tangent to the rocket

• See the dropbox for examples of research papers relevant to our aerogel research

2013 CDR

Mission Requirements (Level 0)

• O1: Record frequency phase shifts in the E-region using a Dual Frequency GPS

• O2: Derive an electron density profile from the phase shifts

• O3: Use aerogels to collect dust particles • O4: House aerogels in a water-tight

container • O5: Use sensors to monitor flight

12

2013 CDR

Mission Requirements (O1 Levels 1 and 2)

•  O1.R1: GASP shall fly a dual frequency GPS –  O1.R1.SR1: The GPS shall be unlocked for space flight –  O1.R1.SR2: GASP team shall adhere to all ITAR restrictions

•  O1.R2: GASP shall fly a dual frequency antenna –  O1.R2.SR2: A mechanism for communicating with satellites

prior to exposure to the atmosphere shall be implemented •  O1.R3: GASP shall build a housing for the GPS which

will: –  Prevent outgassing –  Prevent anyone from seeing the ITAR restricted hardware

•  O1.R4: GASP shall provide its own power and power control for the GPS

13

2013 CDR

Mission Requirements (O2 Levels 1 and 2)

• O2.R1: GASP shall record phase shifts – GASP shall store data on its internal

memory and shall pass data through the RS-232 port

• O2.R2: GASP shall use mathematical relations to derive TEC and electron density from phase shifts

14

2013 CDR

Mission Requirements (O3 Levels 1 and 2)

• O3.R1: The linear actuator should expose the aerogel to the streamline

• O3.R2: The linear actuator should retract the aerogel back into container

15

2013 CDR

Mission Requirements (O4 Levels 1 and 2)

• O4.R1: The aerogel housing shall mechanically seal

• O4.R2: The housing shall provide an external mechanism to keep the telescoping arm in the container post collection

• O4.R3: The housing should prevent water from contaminating the aerogel sample

16

2013 CDR

Success Criteria:

– Minimum Success: • The GPS collects and records phase shift data • The sensors, which will have flown, provide detailed

information about the flight – Comprehensive Success:

• The GPS communicates with at least one satellite throughout the entire flight

• The aerogel is exposed to the atmosphere • The aerogel is retracted back into its housing • The housing protects the aerogel from water

exposure

17

2013 PDR

Mission Overview: Expected Results

11

• GPS: • Expect to measure TECs • The TECs will be used to derive an E-

region profile • Aerogel mission:

• Expect to return aerogel container with sensor readings

2013 PDR

Mission Overview: Expected Results

11

• GPS: • TEC vs. Altitude plot is being redone for an altitude range of 50-200km • We will provide an updated plot when this is completed • Old plot is given on the next page as an example

2013 PDR

2013 PDR

Mission Overview: Concept of Operations

• Receiver should power up five minutes before flight • Receiver should begin recording at point A • Receiver should stop recording at chute deploy • The Aerogel actuated gate valve should open at point B and close at point C • Linear actuator pushes aerogel outside of vacuum chamber and return aerogel to chamber between points B and C • See ConOps on next slide for definitions of point B, point C, and chute deploy

21

2013 CDR

Concept of Operations – Timed Events Matrix

22

2013 PDR

ConOps

t ≈ ?

Altitude: ?

Event A

•  Side blown off; GPS begins recording

t ≈ 15 min

Splash Down

t ≈ 1.7 min

Altitude: 95 km

Event B

•  LA exposes aerogel

-G switch triggered

-All systems on

-GPS begins to track location

t = 0 min

t ≈ 4.0 min

Altitude: 95 km

Event C

•  Aerogel sample retracted into housing

•  External door seals aerogel in housing

Apogee

t ≈ 2.8 min

Altitude: ≈115 km

End of Orion Burn

t ≈ 0.6 min

Altitude: 52 km

Altitude

t ≈ 5.5 min

Chute Deploys

2013 CDR

2.0 Design Description Name of Presenter

24

2013 CDR

Actions from PDR

25

•  Aerogel density •  Aerogel safety •  TEC graph •  Rework functional block diagram •  Wallops antenna

2013 CDR

Changes Since PDR

26

• Two meetings at APL to discuss CDR and designs

• Redesigned aerogel project • Added sensors to the project • Analyzed GPS housing; in the process of

analyzing aerogel project through finite element analysis

Changes Since PDR

27  

ñ GPS Subsystem Themal Vac Housing Designed New Antenna Chosen (includes L2)

ñ Payload integration subsystem designed

ñ These changes do not affect our objectives

Func(onal  Block  Diagram  

Humidity  Sensor     Aerogel  

Motor  

Mechanical Elements: GPS Insulation

29

CerMax™ Extreme High Temperature Ceramic Fiber Paper will be used to insulate the GPS chamber. •  Capable of withstanding temperatures up to

2300 ⁰F •  Will be used to keep GPS below working

temperature of 131 ⁰F  

FlameShield™ Liquid Gel Adhesive/Sealant will be used to seal the casing of the GPS chamber. •  Capable of withstanding temperatures up to

2000 ⁰F •  Used to seal the chamber for waterproofing,

sealant needs to also withstand high temperatures

Mechanical Elements: GPS Casing

30

!

!

"

"

#

#

$

$

% %

& &

' '

( (

)*++,-!--./-!-

(0%12

'*+'3+(

4%

5/6

%770.8+(

99:;<<;: !"=>="?!"

(16-2.

@AB;CDEF<DG;<H

,I,J+

)IK+

')'%J+

0+8

LM""

!M>>

#M>$

M!#

LM!?M$"

M!#

"M$N

MO?

Mechanical Elements: GPS Case Port Holes

31

!

!

"

"

#

#

$

$

% %

& &

' '

( (

)*++,-!--./-!-

(0%12

'*+'3+(

4%

5/6

%770.8+(

99:;<<;: !"=>="?!"

(16-2.

@A<BC;<DBE:FGH

,I,J+

)IK+

')'%J+

0+8

#L>$

!L>>

L#?

L!?

L!#LMML>M

L""

LM#

Mechanical Design Elements – Aerogel Payload

32

• Aluminum will be used for outer casing, truss structure, door, and aerogel array.

• Stress/strain analysis to be done in very near future using SolidWorks

!

!

"

"

#

#

$

$

% %

& &

' '

( (

)*++,-!--./-!-

(0%12

'*+'3+(

4%

5/6

%770.8+(

99:;<<;: !"=>="?!"

(16-2.

@AB;CDEF<DG;<H

,I,J+

)IK+

')'%J+

0+8

LM""

!M>>

#M>$

M!#

LM!?M$"

M!#

"M$N

MO?

Aerogel  Payload  

Aerogel  Payload  

Aerogel  Array  and  Arm  

Aerogel  Array  and  Arm  

Electrical Design Elements

37  

Power Switching: ñ GSE-1 line converted to usable voltage (5-7.5V)

– GPS • On/Off conditional on GSE-1 line present.

– Payload Control/Aerogel Sybsystem • When GSE-1 signal given, piezoelectric sensor

senses for launch vibrations. • When launch occurs, circuit completes and

systems on. SR latch used so if GSE off after launch, subsystem still on.

Electrical Design Elements

38  

Sensor SEN-09196 BMP085 RHT03 GP2Y0A21YK

FirgelliL12

Type Piezo-Electric Sensor

Pressure and Temperature Sensor

Humidity Sensor Proximity Sensor

Linear Actuator Position State

Purpose Detects when launch initialiazes

Determine if and when skin has been edjected

Determine if water has entered the vacuum sealed chamber upon splashdown

Determine if and when skin has been edjected

Provide feed back on state of linear actuator

Location Payload Control System

Payload Control Unit

Aerogel Subsystem Vacuum Chamber

Payload Control Unit

Aerogel Subsystem

Voltage None required 3.3V 3.3V 3.3V 5V and Vref

Potential Cause of Failure

Launch vibrations not detected

Pressure leak but Skin not ejected

Subsystem omponent outgasing may be seen

IR from Sun may affect sensor

Connection Failure through Hbridge and breakout

Electrical Design Elements

39  

Pressure Sensor-Arduino interface

Electrical Design Elements

40  

Proximity Sensor-Arduino interface

Electrical Design Elements

41  

Humidity Sensor-Arduino interface

Electrical Design Elements

42  

Linear Actuator-Arduino interface

Software Design Elements

43  

Begin  collec(ng  data  from  sensors  

Rocket  casing  off?  

Extend  linear  actuator  

Reached  95  km?  

Data  from  proximity  sensor  

Al(metry  data  from  pressure  sensor  

Al(metry  data  from  pressure  sensor  

Reached  95  km?  

No  

Yes  

No  

No  

Yes  

Yes  

Retract  linear  

actuator  

Arduino Pro

2013 CDR

De-Scopes and Off-Ramps

44

• All portions of our project are low risk; no off-ramps planned in case of budget/time constraints

• All objectives from PDR presentation remain feasible

2013 CDR

3.0 GPS Subsystem Design Name of Presenter

45

GPS Subsystem Design

46  

grandpmr.com  

Power –  Subsystem independently powered by Li-ion 7.2V 1.37 Ah battery –  Up to 10 hrs runtime –  Small voltage from Power Control System acts like an on/off switch

Data –  ITAR Restricted

Mechanical and Electrical Interfaces –  Reciever interfaces with Power, Antenna (TNC Female) and Rocket (RS232)

Weight –  435g (reciever) + 150g (antenna) = 585g total for Subsystem

Critical Technology Used –  GPS reciever: ITAR Restricted –  Dual feed omnidirectiona Antenna: Antcom G5

Current Issues –  Must develop waterproof and insulated housing for reciever

2013 CDR

3.0 Aerogel Design Name of Presenter

47

Aerogel Subsystems

Aerogel Experiment

Mechanical Subsystems

Linear Actuator

Electrical Subsystem

Subsystem Design: Aerogels

Press. & Hum.

Sensors

Arduino

Motor Microprocessor

Subsystem Design: Linear Actuator

49

hPp://www.firgelli.com/Uploads/ID2IMAGE1314766540.  

Power –  Activated by MCU and motor microprocessor

to extend and bring aerogel back into chamber

–  6-12 VDC Mechanical and Electrical Interfaces

–  LA interfaces directly to the VC, EPS, and aerogel

Weight –  ~84 g

Critical Technology Used –  Responsible for exposing aerogel directly to

space environment Current Issues

–  Need to finalize selection , potential LA is the Firgelli L16 with 140mm stroke length

hPp://www.ultramo(on.com/images/pv_bug1.jpg  

Subsystem Design: Aerogel Experiment

50

Data –  Aerogel acts a storage mechanism for particles

being studied –  Further analysis after retrieval will verify results

of experiment Mechanical and Electrical Interfaces

–  Aerogel sample is directly interfaced with the LA Weight

–  ~0.00075g Critical Technology Used

–  LA Current Issues

–  Must make sure aerogel array will be able to withstand vibrations and be able to prevent damage or contamination to aerogel

Subsystem Design: Aerogel Electrical Subsystem

51

Power –  Subsystem powers motors which are

actuated during the duration of the aerogel experiment and takes data from sensors

–  5VDC input Data

–  An Arduino will be programmed to send the proper signal to motor microprocessor in order to extend and retract arm with aerogel array

Mechanical and Electrical Interfaces –  Interfaces with EPS, LA, sensors, and

Rocket Critical Technology Used

–  Rocket interface, LA, sensors Current Issues

–  Must make sure that algorithm of Arduino will be executed properly

hPps://dlnmh9ip6v2uc.cloudfront.net/images/products/1/0/9/1/5/10915-­‐01.jpg  

Subsystem Design: Aerogel Electrical Subsystem

52

Power –  Sensors have input of 3.3V provided by Arduino

Data –  An RHT03 humidity sensor will be used to verify

success of experiment (water contamination) –  A BMP085 pressure sensor will allow for payload to

recognize its location based on atmospheric pressure, in order to extend and retract arm and also the verify experiment success after splashdown

Mechanical and Electrical Interfaces –  Interfaces with EPS, Aerogel chamber, and Rocket

Critical Technology Used –  Aerogel Chamber, Arduino

Current Issues –  Must make sure that sensors will be integrated

properly into payload

hPp://www.adafruit.com/index.php?main_page=popup_image&pID=391  

hPps://dlnmh9ip6v2uc.cloudfront.net/images/products/1/0/1/6/7/10167-­‐01.jpg  

Subsystem Design: Aerogel Electrical Subsystem

53

Power –  Subsystem powers motors which are

actuated during the duration of the aerogel experiment

–  Input of 6-12VDC Data

–  A Firgelli Linear Actuator Control Board interfaced to Arduino will be used to verify arm position along with speed and direction motor will be run at

Mechanical and Electrical Interfaces –  Interfaces with EPS, LA, and Arduino

Critical Technology Used –  LA, Arduino

Current Issues –  Must make sure that Control Board is

properly integrated between Arduino and LA

hPp://www.firgelli.com/Uploads/ID2IMAGE1314766661.  

2013 CDR

Organizational Chart

54

Project Manager Marie Hepfer

Lead System Engineer + Aerogel

Science Chris Mogni

Organization JHU EPS Department

Faculty Advisor Darren Waugh

Organization JHU APL

Mentors Ethan Miller

Jonnathan Fenske

Aerogel Science Nick Lybarger

GPS Team Lead Krysti Papadopoulos

Aerogel Build Lead Lauren Powers

Lead Aerogel Engineer

Kristy Webber

GPS Aerospace Engineer

Brianna Brassard Aerogel Aerospace Engineer

Mazi Wallace

Systems Engineer + Lead Electrical

Engineer Corrie Russell

2013 CDR

4.0 Prototyping/Analysis Name of Presenter

55

2013 CDR

Analysis Results

56

• Finite Element Analysis is being conducted in Solid Works for the aerogel project

• Thermal analysis on GPS housing provided on next slide

57

Temperature  Effects  on  GPS  Casing  

δ = α(ΔΤ)(L)

δ =

δ =

(12.9*10-­‐6/°F)(500°F-­‐68.1°F)(6.2205in)  

0.0347in  

Highest  Reentry  Temperature:  500°F  Average  Lowest  Temperature  for  Wallops,  VA  in  August*:  68.1°F  Longest  Casing  Dimension:  6.2205  in  

*Need  max  change  in  length  due  to  temperature  so  pick  average  low  temperature  for  Wallops,  VA.  Also  Why  the  longest  casing  dimension  is  chosen  for  calcula(on.  

2013 CDR

Prototyping Results

58

• Prototyping will take place during our Winter Session in January

• See next slide for prototyping plan

 Date Test Risks  Mi(gated/Func(onality  Tested

Jan Sea  Level  Test Electrical  func(onality.  Power-­‐up  in  (mely  fashion,  satellites  tracked,  and  loca(on  cross  verified  with  other  GPS,  i.e.  iPhone.  Data  stores  in  memory.  

Jan Antenna  Test Antenna  truly  omni-­‐direc(onal.  Diagrams  of  maximum  field  of  view  created.  Verify  that  Antenna  will  work  inside  housing  material.

Jan-­‐Feb TEC  inferring  test Dual  frequency  capability  verified.  TEC  algorithm  developed  and  referenced  with  heritage  data.

Jan-­‐Feb  Waterproof  test Develop  and  test  casing  tested  for  waterproofing.

Feb-­‐Mar Thermo-­‐Vac  test Rocket  and  space  environment  simulated.  Casing  Internal  temperature  within  -­‐30  C  and  +55  C

Feb-­‐Mar Flight  Simula(on Data  collected  at  various  al(tudes  and  loca(ons  (with  weather  balloon).  Simula(on  solware  used.

Mar-­‐Apr Integrated  Shock  Test

Flight's  Gees,  linear  velocity,  and  rota(on  simulated.    GPS  works  at  real    (me  kinema(c  accuracy.  

Apr Project  Integra(on Fits  into  payload  board.  Test  with  other  systems.

Test/Prototyping Plan GPS

2013 CDR

Detailed Mass Budget

60

Subsystem Weight (g) GPS and antenna 585

AGV 1300

LA 1500

AS .00075

Total 3385 = 3.385 kg

Detailed Power Budget

61  

Subsystem   Voltage  (V)   Max  Current  (A)  

Start  Time  (min)  

Time  On  (min)   WaPs     Ah  

GPS   7.2   1.37   T  -­‐  5   20   9.86   0.274  

Linear  Actuator   12.0   0.65   T  -­‐  5   20   7.80   0.130  

Arduino  Pro   5.0   0.56   T  -­‐  5   20   2.80   0.112  

 Total*     –   2.58    –    –   20.46   0.52  

 Total  Power  Capacity   1.00  

 Over/Under   0.48  

#  of  Flights  Margin   1.9  

*We  will  be  using  external  power  sources  for  all  subsystems,  so  our  power  usage  should  not  contribute  to  the  total  power  usage  for  our  deck.  

Wallops Interfacing: Power

62  

Power Pin Function Intended Use 1 GSE 1 Provide 5 minute lead time to launch

2 Timer Event 1 (R-A) (no current use)

3 Timer Event 2 (R-B) (no current use)

4 Timer Event 3 (NR-1) (reserved for WV)

5 GND GND

6 GND GND

7 GND GND

8 GND GND

9 GSE 2 (reserved for WV)

10 Timer Event 4 (NR-2) (reserved for WV)

11 Timer Event 5 (NR-3) (reserved for WV)

12 GND (reserved for WV)

13 GND (reserved for WV)

14 GND (reserved for WV)

15 GND (reserved for WV)

Wallops Interfacing: Telemetry

63  

Telemetry Function Intended Use Telemetry Function Intended Use 1 Analog 1 Data from sensors 20 Parallel Bit 7 (no current use)

2 Analog 2 Data from sensors 21 Parallel Bit 8 (no current use)

3 Analog 3 Data from sensors 22 Parallel Bit 9 (reserved for WV)

4 Analog 4 Data from sensors 23 Parallel Bit 10 (reserved for WV)

5 Analog 5 Data from sensors 24 Parallel Bit 11 (reserved for WV)

6 Analog 6 (reserved for WV) 25 Parallel Bit 12 (reserved for WV)

7 Analog 7 (reserved for WV) 26 Parallel Bit 13 (reserved for WV)

8 Analog 8 (reserved for WV) 27 Parallel Bit 14 (reserved for WV)

9 Analog 9 (reserved for WV) 28 Parallel Bit 15 (reserved for WV)

10 Analog 10 (reserved for WV) 29 Parallel Bit 16 (LSB) (reserved for WV)

11 Parallel Bit 1 (MSB) (no current use) 30 Parallel Read Strobe (no current use)

12 Parallel Bit 2 (no current use) 31 N/C N/C

13 Parallel Bit 3 (no current use) 32 RS-232 Data (TP1) Transfer data from GPS

14 Parallel Bit 4 (no current use) 33 RS-232 GND (TP2) GND for RS-232 Data

15 Parallel Bit 5 (no current use) 34 N/C N/C

16 Parallel Bit 6 (no current use) 35 N/C N/C

17 N/C N/C 36 Ground (reserved for WV)

18 Ground GND 37 Ground (reserved for WV)

19 Ground GND

2013 CDR

5.0 Manufacturing Plan Name of Presenter

64

2013 CDR

Mechanical Elements

65

• We are manufacturing everything except for the linear actuator

• Post-CDR: Buy Parts • Jan 2013: Building (at UMD and APL) • Feb 2013: Testing

2013 CDR

Electrical Elements

66

• Manufacturing/Soldering to be done • Payload Control Unit (sensors and Microprocessor must be procured) • Power Block(converter components must be procured)

• Plan/Schedule • Power Block: Design (Jan), PCB/Soldering (Feb) • Payload Control Unit: Design (Jan), PCB/Soldering (Feb) • Integration into Aerogel Subsystem (Mar)

2013 CDR

Software Elements

67

• Microprocessor code must be written and blocs must be integrated

• Bloc Dependency Previously Mentioned • Software tested as Payload Control Unit

designed

2013 CDR

6.0 Testing Plan Name of Presenter

68

2013 CDR

Electrical Testing

69

Subsystem Test Overview When

GPS Output GPS Verify Baud and bitrate of GPS output. Jan

GPS Power/Comm

GPS Verify power port acts like a switch. Verify batteries/antenna will last flight duration.

Jan

Power Block Power Block Verify converter works. Jan/Feb

Piezo-Switch Payload Control Subsystem

Verify vibration to voltage relationship. Determine threshold for launch.Verify latch works and is consistent.

Feb

Demodulator Payload Control System

Verify Microprocessor can communicate with Analog and Digital pins. Check Baud/data rate.

Feb

Sensors/LA feedback

Payload Control/Aerogel

Verify sensor calibration and sequencing. Optimal LA feedback setting should be selected.

Jan-Feb

2013 CDR

Electrical Testing

70

•  High Voltage Component: Potential the Piezoelectric Sensor

(+- 90V) but only upon very high vibrations. Will buffer with voltage follower or other method.

•  Internally Powered Components will be tested during sample runtime missions for battery depletion –  GPS Subsystem –  Aerogel Subsystem –  Microprocessor/Sensors

•  Only inhibit for Wallops testing is facility to charge batteries

2013 CDR

Software Testing

71

Most of the software is needed for electrical design of sensor interfaces and LA movement (no Software for GPS subsystem)

Code written/tested independantly as each sensor/subsystem is designed and developed. (Jan-Feb)

Integrated code developed and tested with mission sequence

in mind during the sensor integration phase.(Feb-Mar) Software for post-flight data testing will also be in the

works. (Mar-July)

System Level Testing

72

• Integration of GPS and Aerogel components to function as a cohesive unit. • Tests will performed to simulate sensor outputs and deployment mechanisms. •  Thermal Vacuum Chamber testing will be used to verify and ensure that the desired mechanical, electrical, and structural tasks will perform in flight temperature conditions.

System Level Testing Timeline

73

• Testing will occur throughout the build process and during the months proceeding the launch.

•  December: Design Completion • January–February: Initial testing of sensors and structural components during building process. • February–April: Integration testing of GPS and Aerogel unit. Thermal vacuum chamber testing. • April–May: Software Testing • May–July: Final Systems and Integration Testing

• Possibility for an addition Thermal Vacuum Chamber Test and Drop Test.

Mechanical Testing

74

• Verify payload is within the weight requirement and fits within the capsule constraints. • Perform vibrations testing of integrated payload.

•  Approximate Testing Date: March 2013 •  Thermal Vacuum Chamber testing will verify that the structure can withstand the temperature changed during flight.

• Approximate Testing Date: March 2013

Structural Testing

75

• Use Solidworks drawing software to perform stress and strain analysis on the aerogel compartment structure.

• Approximate Testing Date: January 2013 • Conduct a Smoke Test to verify that the system is waterproof and can withstand the landing environment.

• Approximate Test Date: February 2013 •  Perform a Drop Test to confirm that the payload can withstand impact forces.

• Approximate Testing Date: March/April 2013

Mechanical Deployment Testing

76

•  Testing for the deployment system will include: •  Confirm that the linear actuator moves in and out of the vacuum-sealed container without failures or hesitations.

• Door opening and closing mechanism: • Verify that the container door opens and closes properly and completely without gaps in the connection area.

• O-ring testing: • Perform a submersion test to confirm that the O-ring seal is tight and no water will get into the container.

Electrical Testing: Aerogel

77

•  Verification of working sensors: pressure and humidity sensors. •  Allow sensors to run while testing the

linear actuator. •  Sensor readings should show that the

linear actuator is functioning as desired. •  Test Arduino Pro and all other components to

confirm that they have the correct voltages. •  Verify circuitry is correct and complete.  

Test Date for all Electrics: January – early February 2013

Internally Powered Components

78

•  The following components on the integrated payload will be internally powered. • GPS • Arduino Pro • Motor for Linear Actuator

 

Software Testing: Aerogel

79

•  Test Arduino outside of the system to verify that it functions properly and produces the desired information •  Algorithm testing •  Approximate Test Dates: January and February 2013

•  Confirm that the motor and the sensors are communicating. •  Sensors should produce accurate and

consistent data for each task performed. •  Approximate Testing Date: March and April 2013

•  Simulation Testing for system operation verification. •  Approximate Testing Date: April and May 2013

2013 CDR

7.0 User Guide Compliance Name of Presenter

80

User Guide Compliance

81  

Requirement   Status/Reason  (if  needed)  

Center  of  gravity  in  1"  plane  of  plate?  

Max  Height  <  12"   <  5.5’’  (sharing  with  WV)    

Within  Keep-­‐Out      

Using  <  10  A/D  Lines   <  5  A/D  Line  (sharing  with  WV)    

Using/Understand  Parallel  Line   Currently  not  using  

Using/Understand  Asynchronous  Line   9200  Baud  

Using  X  GSE  Line(s)   1  (per  requirement)  

Using  X  Redundant  Power  Lines   Currently  not  using  

Using  X  Non-­‐Redundant  Power  Lines   Will  not  use  

Using  <  1  Ah   External  power  sources  

Using  <=  28  V   <  28  V  (will  not  have  to  conformal  coat)  

2013 CDR

Sharing Logistics

82

•  We are sharing with West Virginia University –  Project: Unknown

•  Plan for collaboration –  The JHU team has put together a forum to help our

team communicate; we have invited WVU to our collaboration forum

–  We will share designs via the forum; we would like to share a dropbox folder for designs

•  We have not met with the sharing team •  POC: Alex Bouvy ([email protected])

2013 CDR

8.0 Project Management Plan Name of Presenter

83

2013 CDR

Schedule

84

Item Date Submit proposals 14-Dec

Order Parts As soon as we have money

Contruction Begins January 7th

GPS Thermal Casing Finished by January 11th

Vacuum Box Finished by January 18th

Vacuum Box Linear Actuator integration Finished January 25th

Entire Assembly Finished February 8th

Testing

GPS Programming Testing Starts January 7th

GPS Casing Testing Starts January 14th

Aerogel Vacuum Box Testing Starts January 28th

Entire Assembly Testing Starts February 11

2013 CDR

RockSat-X Schedule

85

12/11/2012 Critical Design Review (CDR) Teleconference 12/15/2012 Post CDR Action Item Generation 1/18/2013 Final Down Select—Flights Awarded TBA Wallops DR 01/28/2013 Post CDR Action Item Review 02/18/2013 First Installment Due 02/18/2013 Individual Subsystem Testing Reports Due 02/19/2013 Individual Subsystem Testing Reports Teleconference 02/25/2013 Experiment Decks and Connectors Sent To Customers 03/18/2013 Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Due 03/19/2012 Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Teleconference 04/08/2013 Final Installment Due 04/15/2013 First DITL Test Report Due 04/16/2012 DITL 1 Teleconferences 05/06/2013 Weekly Teleconferences Begin 05/13/2013 Weekly Teleconference 1 05/13/2013 Second DITL Test Report Due 05/14/2013 Weekly Teleconference 2 (2nd DITL Presentations) 05/20/2013 Weekly Teleconference 3 05/27/2013 Weekly Teleconference 4 (Travel Logistics) 06/03/2013 Integration Readiness Review Packages (IRR) Due 06/04/2013 Integration Readiness Review Telecons with Wallops 06/18/2013 GSE Checkouts At Refuge 06/19>24/2013

Testing and Environmental With Wallops 07/01/2013 Weekly Teleconferences Resume 07/22/2013 Launch Readiness Review Packages (LRR) Due 07/23/2013

Launch Readiness Review Telecons with Wallops 08/01/2013 GSE Checkouts at Refuge Inn 08/02>07/2013 Final Integration at Wallops 08/08/2013 LAUNCH 08/09/2013 Contingency Launch

2013 CDR

Budget

86

- Aerogel Project: ~$1,000 -  GPS Project: ~$300 -  Spare Parts: ~$200 -  Travel: ~$5,000 -  Deposit: $2,000 -  Other RockSat-X Costs: $12,000 -  Margin of Error: 10% -  Initial Deposit Paid -  SSL Providing Funds for Aerogel -  Maryland Space Consortium Providing Funds for RockSat-X Costs -  APL Providing Materials for GPS

2013 CDR

Team Availability Matrix

87

2013 CDR

Contact Matrix

88

2013 CDR

Mission Accomplished

89