criminal law 1 jona notes
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
1/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 1
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Criminal Law – branch or division of law which defines crimes, treat of their nature, provides for their
punishment.
Crime – act committed or omitted in violation of a public law forbidding or commanding it.
Bill of Attainder - punishes an act without trial or due process.
Ex Post Facto – punishes an act in which there is no law at the time of commission.
Characteristics of Criminal Law.
1. General – Criminal Law is binding on all persons who live or sojourn in Philippine territory,
subject to certain exceptions.
General jurisdiction to punish persons for offenses committed within its territory,
regardless of the nationality of the offender. No foreigner enjoys extra-territorial right
to be exempted from the law and jurisdiction, with the exception of heads of states and
diplomatic representatives.
Civil courts have jurisdiction over murder cases committed by persons subject to
military law. Even in times of war, the civil courts have concurrent jurisdiction with the
military courts or general courts – martial over soldiers of the Philippine Army, providedthat in the place of the commission of the crime no hostilities are in progress and civil
courts are functioning.
A court-martial is a court, and the prosecution of an accused before it is a criminal, not
an administrative case, and therefore it would be, under certain conditions, a bar to
another prosecution of the accused for the same offense, because the latter would
place the accused in double jeopardy.
EO 68, establishing a National War Crimes Office and prescribing the rules and
regulations governing the trial of war criminals is valid and constitutional. The
promulgation of the EO 68 is an exercise by the President as his powers as Commander-
in-Chief of all our armed forces.
EXCEPTION:
Article 2, RPC : provisions of this Code shall be enforced within the Philippine Archipelago
“except as provided in the treaties and laws of preferential application”.
Article 14, New Civil Code: provides that penal laws and those of public security and safety
shall be obligatory upon all who live or sojourn in Philippine territory, subject to the
principles of public international law and to treaty stipulations.
Treaties or treaty stipulation – example, as an exception to the general application of our
criminal law, is the Bases Agreement between the Philippines and US – stipulating that the
Philippine consents that the US have the right to exercise jurisdiction over some offenses.
Law of preferential application – example is RA 75, in favor of diplomatic representatives
and their domestic servants. (Not applicable when the foreign country adversely affected
does not provide similar protection to our diplomatic representatives.)
*Warrants issued to be executed at the foreign embassies must pass through Department of
Foreign Affairs, if it not, then it will violate the public international law.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
2/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 2
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Persons exempt from the operation of our criminal laws by virtue of the principles of public
international law:
1.
Sovereigns and other chiefs of state.
2.
Ambassadors, ministers plenipotentiary, ministers residents and charges d’ affairs.
*Consuls, vice-consuls, and other commercial representatives of foreign nations are not
entitled to the privileges and immunities of an ambassador or minister, but are subject
to the laws and regulations of the country to which he is accredited.
Doctrine of Inviolability – embassy grounds in the Philippines are not extension of the
foreign country, it just enjoys immunity. The Philippines can still have jurisdiction over it.
2. Territorial – Criminal laws undertake to punish crimes committed within the Philippine
territory, subject to some exceptions.
Article 2, RPC : provisions of this Code shall be enforced within the Philippine Archipelago including
its atmosphere, its interior waters and maritime zone.
Article 1, 1987 Constitution: national territory comprises the Philippine Archipelago, with all theislands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has
sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial, and aerial domains, including its
territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The
waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their
breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines.
EXCEPTIONS: (ARTICLE 2, RPC)
Provisions in the RPC shall be enforced outside the jurisdiction of the Philippines against those
who:
1.
Should commit an offense while on a Philippine ship or airship;
2.
Should forge or counterfeit any coin or currency note of the Philippine or obligations andsecurities issued by the Government of the Philippines;
3.
Should be liable for acts connected with the introduction into the Philippines of the
obligations and securities mentioned in the preceding number;
4.
While being a public officers or employees, should commit an offense in the exercise of their
functions;
5.
Should commit any of the crimes against national security and the law of nations, defined in
Title One of Book Two of the RPC.
Reasons for such exceptions:
1 – Philippine vessel or airship is considered as an extension of Philippine territory.
2 & 3 - To protect the economic and financial stability of the country.
4 - Public officer is a representative of the Philippines, any crime committed by them will
result into humiliation of the country.
5- To protect the very existence of our country or government.
3. PROSPECTIVE – A penal law cannot make an act punishable in a manner in which it was not
punishable when committed.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
3/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 3
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Article 366, RPC: crimes are punished under the laws in force at the time of their commission.
EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROSPECTIVE APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL LAWS:
Whenever a new statute dealing with a crime establishes the conditions more lenient or
favorable to the accused, it can be given a retroactive effect. But this exception has no
application:
1.
Where the new law is expressly made inapplicable to pending actions or existing causes of
action.
2.
Where the offender is a habitual criminal under Rule 5, Article 62, RPC.
Different effects of repeal on penal law:
1.
If the repeal makes the penalty lighter in the new law, the new law shall be applied, except
when the offender is a habitual delinquent or when the new law is made not applicable to
pending action or existing causes of action.
2.
If the new law imposes a heavier penalty, the law in force at the time of the commission of
the offense shall be applied.
3.
If the new law totally repeals the existing law so that the act which was penalized under the
old law is no longer punishable, the crime is eliminated / obliterated.
Where the repeal is absolute, the offense ceases to be criminal. The accused must be acquitted.
But repeal of a penal law by its reenactment, even without a saving clause, would not destroy
criminal liability.
When the new law and the old law penalize the same offense, the offender can be tried under
the old law.
The court loses jurisdiction where the repealing law wholly fails to penalize the act defined and
penalized as an offense in the old law. The accused, charged with violations of the old law prior
to the repeal, cannot be legally prosecuted after such repeal.
ARTICLE 3.
Felony – acts and omissions punishable by law.
Elements of a felony:
A.
There must be an act or omission.
B.
Such act or omission must be punishable under RPC.
C.
Act if performed or omitted by means of dolo (with intent to harm other) or culpa (fault).
Act – any bodily movement tending to produce some effect in the external world, it being unnecessary
that the same be actually produced, as the possibility of its production is sufficient.
Nullum Crimen Nulla Poena Sine Lege – There is no crime when there is no law punishing it.
“Punished by law” – punished by RPC, and not by a special law.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
4/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 4
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Classification of felonies according to the means by which they are committed. (I and II belongs to
Art.3)
I.
Intentional felonies – act or omission of the offender is malicious.; act is performed with
deliberate intent; offender has the intention to cause harm or injury to another.
II.
Culpable felonies – injury caused by the offender is “unintentional, it being simply the incident
of another act performed without malice’.
III.
Crimes defined and penalized by special laws, includes crimes punished by municipal or city
ordinances. – Intent to commit the crime is not necessary.
Reason for punishing acts of negligence (culpa) - A man must use common sense, and exercise due
reflection in all his acts; it is his duty to be cautious, careful and prudent, if not from instinct, then
through fear of incurring punishment.
*A criminal act is presumed to be voluntary.
Three reasons why the act or omission in felonies must be voluntary.
1.
RPC continues to be based on the Classical Theory, according to which the basis of criminal
liability is human free will.
2.
Acts or omissions punished by law are always deemed voluntary, since man is a rational being. 3.
In felonies by dolo, act is performed with deliberate intent which must necessarily be voluntary;
and in felonies by culpa, the imprudence consists in voluntarily, but without malice, doing or
failing to do an act from which material injury results.
Requisites of felonies committed by DOLO or MALICE:
1.
Freedom – When a person acts without freedom, he is no longer a human being but a tool.
2.
Intelligence – Without this power, necessary to determine the morality of human acts, no crime
can exist.
3.
Intent – intent to commit the act with malice, being purely a mental process, is presumed and
the presumption arises from the proof of the commission of an unlawful act.
Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea – A crime is not committed if the mind of the person performing
to act complained be innocent. ; Act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intention were so.
Actus me invicte factus non est meus actus – An act done by me against my will is not my act.
Mistake of fact – misapprehension of fact on the part of the person who caused injury to another. He is
not criminally liable, because he did not act with criminal intent.
Requisites of Mistake of Fact as a Defense:
1.
Act done would have been lawful had the facts been as the accused believed them to be.
2.
The intention of the accused in performing the act should be lawful.
3.
Mistake must be without fault or carelessness on the part of the accused.
*In mistake of fact, act done by the accused would have constituted a justifying circumstance under
Article 11, an absolutory cause, and an involuntary act.
Ignorantia legis non excusat – ignorance of the law excuses no one from compliance therewith.
Ignorantia facti excusat – ignorance or mistake of fact relieves the accused from criminal liability.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
5/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 5
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Requisites of felonies committed by CULPA: (The mind of the accused is not criminal, however, his act is
wrongful.)
1.
Freedom
2.
Intelligence
3.
He is imprudent, negligent, or lacks foresight or skill, while doing the act or omitting to do the
act.
*Committing a suicide – is not a felony, any wrong acts resulting from suicide is and will not be
punishable under the law.
MALA IN SE - Wrongful from their nature. Acts are inherently immoral. Those so serious in their effects
on society as to call for almost unanimous condemnation of its members.
MALA PROHIBITA – Wrong merely because prohibited by statute. Acts made criminal by special laws.
Violations of mere rules of convenience designed to secure a more orderly regulation of the
affairs of society.
Intent – purpose to use a particular means to effect such result. Essential element of a crime. Desired
act of a person.
Discernment – mental ability to understand the morality of one’s act, as well as the consequences of
one’s unlawful act. Relates to the moral significance that a person ascribes to the said act (intent).
Motive – Reason behind the intent. Moving power which impels one to action for a definite result. Not
an essential element of a crime. Immaterial when the accused has been positively identified. However, if
evidence is merely circumstantial, proof of motive is essential. Established by the testimony of
witness(es) on the acts or statements of the accused before or immediately after the commission of an
offense.
ARTICLE 4. CRIMINAL LIABILITY.
Rationale: El que es causa de la causa es causa del mal causado – He who is the cause of the cause is
the cause of the evil caused.
Paragraph 1: By any person committing a felony (delito) although the wrongful act done be
different from that which he intended.
Requisites:
1.
Intentional felony has been committed.
2.
Wrong done to the aggrieved party to be the direct, natural, and logical consequence of the
felony committed by the offender.
No felony is committed when:
1. The act or omission is not punishable by RPC.
2. The act is covered by any of the justifying circumstance enumerated in Article 11.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
6/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 6
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Doctrines of committing a felony:
1.
Aberratio ictus – mistake in the blow; constitute a complex crime, there must be always 3
person present.
2.
Error in personae - mistake in the identity of the victim
3.
Praeter intentionem – injurious result is greater than that intended; a person even without the
intention to kill but had resulted to the death of the victim, the person is still liable for the said
death.
Any person who creates in another’s mind an immediate sense of danger, which causes the
latter to do something resulting in the latter’s injuries, is liable for the resulting injuries.
If a person against whom a criminal assault is directed reasonably believes himself to be in
danger of death or great bodily harm and in order to escape, impelled by the instinct of self-
preservation, the assailant is responsible for the death or injury arising from such act of the
defendant.
Wrong done must be the direct, natural, and logical consequence of felonious act. [Felony
committed must be the proximate cause of the resulting injury.]
Proximate cause- cause, which in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficientintervening cause, produces the injury, and without the result would not have occurred.
Natural – an occurrence in the ordinary course of human life or events.
Logical – there is a rational connection between the act of the accused and the resulting injury or
damage.
The felony committed is not the proximate cause of the resulting injury when:
1.
There is an active force (distinct act or fact absolutely foreign from the felonious act of the
accused), that intervened between the felony committed and the resulting injury.
2.
The resulting injury is due to the intentional act of the victim.
When death of the victim is presumed to be the natural consequence of the physical injury inflicted:1.
When the victim at the time of the physical injuries were inflicted was in normal health.
2.
Death may be expected from the physical injuries inflicted.
3.
Death ensued within a reasonable time.
IMPOSSIBLE CRIMES - commission of impossible crime is an indicative of criminal propensity or
tendency on the part of the offender. Punished in order to suppress such criminal propensity.
Requisites of Impossible Crimes:
1.
Act performed would be an offense against persons or property.
2.
Act was done with evil intent.
3.
Its accomplishment is inherently impossible, or that means employed is either inadequate or
ineffectual.
4.
Act performed should not constitute a violation of another provision of the RPC.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
7/32
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
8/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 8
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Essential element which distinguishes attempted from frustrated:
Frustrated : there is no intervention of a foreign cause between the beginning of the consummation of
the crime and the moment when all the acts have been performed which should have resulted
in the consummated crime.
Attempted: there is such intervention or he is stopped by some cause apart from his own voluntary
desistance, and the offender does not arrive at performing all of the acts which should have
produced the felony.
Subjective and Objective Phase:
If between these two points, the offender is stopped by any cause outside of his own voluntary
desistance, the subjective phase has not been passed and it is an attempt. If he is not so stopped but
continues until he performs the last act , it is frustrated, provided the crime is not produced. The acts
then of the offender reached the objective phase of the crime.
The offender has reached the objective phase in the frustrated felony; the offender has not
passed the subjective phase in an attempted felony.
Development of crime:
1.
Internal acts – mere ideas in the mind of a person; not punishable. 2.
External acts –
a.
Preparatory act – ordinarily not punishable, except as stated by the law.
b. Acts of execution – punishable under Penal Laws.
Determining the stages of acts of execution.
1.
Nature of Crime
2.
Elements constituting a felony
3.
Manner of committing the crime:
1.
Formal Crime – consummated in one instant or single act because between the thought
and the deed, there is no chain of acts that can be severed in any link. [Example –
slander : mere act of selling or acting as broker of marijuana and other prohibiteddrugs.]
2.
Crimes consummated by mere attempt or proposal or by overt act. [Example – flight to
enemy’s country, corruption of minors, treason.]
3.
Crimes requiring the intervention of 2 persons to commit them are consummated by
mere agreement. [Example – corruption of public officer : offer made of one party
constitute an attempted felony, if such offer was rejected]
4. Material crimes – there are 3 stages of execution [Example – homicide, rape]
5.
Felony by omission - omits to perform an act which the law requires to do.
*No crime of frustrated rape and frustrated theft.
Indeterminate offense – where the purpose of the offender in performing an act is not certain. Its
nature in relation to its objective is ambiguous.
*Acts susceptible for double interpretation must not and cannot furnish grounds by themselves for
attempted crime. The overt acts leading to the commission of the offense are not punishable except
when they are aimed directly at its execution, and therefore they must have an immediate and
necessary relation to the offense.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
9/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 9
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
ARTICLE 8. CONSPIRACY AND PROPOSAL TO COMMIT FELONY.
Conspiracy – when two or more persons come to an agreement concerning the commission of a felony
and decided to commit it. There must be unity of purpose and unity in the execution of the unlawful
objective.
Proposal - when the person who has decided to commit a felony proposes its execution to some other
person or persons.
*Unless there is a specific provision in RPC providing a penalty for conspiracy or proposal to commit a
felony, mere conspiracy or proposal is not a felony.
Two concepts of Conspiracy:
1.
Concept as a crime (felony) itself. – if there is a law providing punishment for mere conspiracy.
Example: treason, rebellion.
2.
Concept as a mode of incurring liability. – Conspiracy and proposal are merely preparatory acts,
will only constitute a crime if committed or consummated. Conspiracy is not a separate offense.
Two kinds of Conspiracy:
1.
Conspiracy by pre-agreement (Expressed Conspiracy) - proven by independent witness, that
the persons involved in conspiracy actually meet and conspire with each other.
2. Implied Conspiracy – individual acts are in unity with the acts and purpose of the other person
involved in the conspiracy. Direct proof is not essential to establish the conspiracy, and may be
inferred from the collective acts of the accused before, during, and after the commission of a
felony.
ARTICLE 9. FELONIES ACCORDING TO THEIR GRAVITY
Grave felonies - those which the law attaches the capital punishment or penalties which in any of their
periods are afflictive, in accordance with Article 25 (Penalties which may be imposed) of this Code.
Less grave felonies – those which the law punishes with penalties which in their maximum period are
correctional, in accordance with the above-mentioned article.
Light felonies - infractions of law for the commission of which the penalty is arresto menor or a fine not
exceeding 200pesos, or both.
Article 10. Offenses not subject to the provisions of this Code.
*First clause – Penal Code is not intended to supersede special penal laws.
*Second clause – soul of the article; Code shall be supplementary to special laws, unless otherwise
provided.
Special law - statute enacted by the Legislative branch, a penal law which punishes acts not defined and
penalized by the Penal Code.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
10/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 10
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
*Article 6, RPC, cannot be applied to offenses punished by special laws.
*Article 10 is not applicable to punish an accomplice under the special law. – If appellant is conceded to
have performed acts which would make of him an accomplice, it would nevertheless be impossible to
impose any penalty upon him because of the demonstrated inapplicability of the principles of the RPC
on accomplices.
*Suppletory effect of the RPC to special laws cannot be invoked when there is a legal impossibility of
application, either by express provision or by necessary implication.
CLASSIFICATION OF CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING CRIMINAL LIABILITY
I. JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCE – those where the act of a person is said to be in accordance with law, so
that such person is deemed not to have transgressed the law and Is free from both criminal and civil
liability, except in Par. 4 Art 11, where the civil liability is borne by the persons benefited by the act.
Basis: The law recognizes the non-existence of a crime by expressly stating in the opening sentence of
Article 11 that the person therein mentioned “do not incur criminal liability”. Burden of proof, as matter
of defense, is incumbent to the accused in order to avoid criminal liability.
Law on Self-defense: finds justification in the man’s natural instinct to protect, repel, and save
his person or rights from impeding danger or peril; based on the impulse of self-preservation.
Requisites of Self-defense:
1.
There is an unlawful aggression.
2.
Reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it. – It does not depend upon
the harm done but rests upon the imminent danger of such injury.
3.
Lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself.
Unlawful aggression - assault or at least threatened assault of an immediate and imminent kind.
It presupposes actual, sudden, and unexpected attack, or imminent danger thereof, and notmerely a threatening or intimidating attitude.
It must be: actual – danger must be present, and imminent – danger is at the point of
happening.
Reasonableness of the necessity depends upon the circumstances: Instinct of self
preservation. “Human nature does not act upon processes of formal reason but in obedience of
the instinct of self preservation”
1.
Necessity of the course of action taken.
a.
Place and occasion of the assault
b.
Darkness of the night and surprise which characterized the assault.
*A person defending himself cannot be expected to think clearly as to control his blow.
2.
Necessity of the means used.
a.
Nature and quality of the weapons
b.
Physical condition, character, and size of both parties
c.
Other circumstances considered
*Slap on the face is an unlawful aggression for the face represents a person and his dignity.
*Mere threatening or intimidating attitude, not preceded by an outward and material
aggression, is not an unlawful aggression.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
11/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 11
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Retaliation - the aggression that was begun by the injured party already ceased to exist when
the accused attacked him.
II. EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCE – those grounds for exemption from punishment because there is
wanting in the agent of then crime any of the conditions which make the act voluntary or negligent.
Based on the complete absence of intelligence, freedom or action, or intent, or on the absence of
negligence on the part of the accused. Burden of proof as a matter of defense must be proved by the
defendant.
Imbecile – one who, while advanced in age, has a mental development comparable to that of
children between two and seven years of age.
Periods of Criminal Responsibility
1.
Age of absolute irresponsibility – 15 years and below (infancy)
2.
Age of conditional responsibility - 15 years and 1 day to 18 years
3.
Age of full responsibility – 18 years or over (adolescence) to 70 (maturity)
4.
Age of mitigated responsibility – 15 years and 1 day to 18 years, offender acting with
discernment, and over 70 years.
RA 9344 – JUVENILE JUSTICE AND WELFARE ACT OF 2006
Diversion - alternative, child appropriate process of determining the responsibility and
treatment of a child in conflict with the law on the basis of his/her social, cultural, economic,
psychological, or educational background without resorting to formal court proceedings.
Diversion Program – program that the child in conflict with the law is required to undergo after
he/she is found responsible for an offense without resorting to formal court proceedings.
Intervention – series of activities which are designed to address issues that caused the child to
commit an offense. It may take form of an individualized treatment program which may includecounseling, skills, training, education, and other activities that will enhance his/her
psychological, emotional, and psycho-social well being.
Restorative Justice - principle which requires a process of resolving conflicts with the maximum
involvement of the victim, the offender, and the community.
Accident – something that happens outside the sway of our will, and although it comes about
through some act of our will, lies beyond the bounds of humanly foreseeable consequences.
Irresistible force – must consist of an extraneous force coming from a third person. Offender
uses violence or physical force to compel another person to commit a crime.
Uncontrollable fear – offender employs intimidation or threat in compelling another to commit
a crime.
Absolutory cause – where the act committed is a crime but for reasons of public policy and
sentiment, there is no penalty imposed.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
12/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 12
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Instigation – the instigator practically induces the would-be accused into the commission of the
offense and himself becomes a co-principal. Here, the accused must be acquitted.
Entrapment – ways and means are resorted to for the purposes of trapping and capturing the
lawbreaker in the execution of his criminal plan.
III. MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE – those which, if present in the commission of the crime, do not
entirely free the actor from criminal liability, but only serve to reduce the penalty; based on the
diminution of either freedom of action, intelligence, or intent, or on the lesser perversity of the
offender.
Ordinary Mitigating Circumstance – can be offset by any aggravating circumstance, if not, it
produces the effect of applying the penalty provided by law for the crime in its minimum
period.
Privileged Mitigating Circumstance - cannot be offset by an aggravating circumstance,
produces the effect of imposing upon the offender the penalty lower by one or two degrees
than that provided by the law for the crime.
Intention – an internal act, judged not only by the proportion of the means employed by him to
the evil produced by his act, but also by the fact that the blow was or was not aimed at a vital
part of the body.
Provocation - any unjust or improper conduct or act of the offended party, capable of exciting,
inciting, or irritating any one, must be sufficient and immediately preceding the act. It is made
directly to the person committing the felony / comes from the offended party.
Vindication - grave offense may be committed also against the offender’s relatives, vindication
of the grave offense may be proximate, and admits of an interval of time between the graveoffense done by the offended party and the commission of the crime of the accused. It concerns
the honor of a person, an offense which is more worthy of consideration than mere spite against
the one giving the provocation or threat.
Premeditation - execution of the criminal act must be preceded by calm thought and reflection
upon the resolution to carry out the criminal intent during the space of time sufficient to arrive
at a composed judgment. Must be based upon external acts and not presumed from mere lapse
of time
Voluntary surrender - offender had voluntarily surrendered himself to a person in authority or
his agents, or that he had voluntarily confessed his guilt before the court prior to the
presentation of the evidence for the prosecution.
*Although this circumstances are considered mitigating in the same subsection, when both are
present, they should have the effect of mitigating as two independent circumstances.
Requisites of Voluntary surrender:
Offender had not been actually arrested
Offender surrendered himself to a person in authority or to the latter’s agents
Surrender was voluntary.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
13/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 13
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Requisite of voluntariness: it must be spontaneous, that it shows the interest of the accused to
surrender unconditionally to the authorities, either because he acknowledged his guilt or he
wishes to save them the trouble and expenses necessarily incurred in his search and capture.
Requisites of plea of guilty:
o
Offender spontaneously confessed his guilt
o Confession of guilt was made in open court
o Confession of guilt was made prior to the presentation of the evidence for the prosecution
*Circumstances which are neither EXEMPTING or MITIGATING:
Mistake in the blow or aberration ictus
Mistake in the identity of the victim or error in personae
Entrapment of the accused
Performance of a righteous act.
IV.AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE – which, if attendant in the commission of a crime, serve to increase
the penalty without exceeding the maximum of the penalty provided by law for the offense.
Four Kinds of Aggravating Circumstance
1.
Generic – can generally apply to all crimes; to increase penalty to the maximum period; may be
compensated by mitigating circumstance
2. Specific - apply to particular crimes
3. Qualifying - those that changes the nature of the crime, places the author of the crime in a
situation as to deserve no other penalty than that specially provided by the law for the said
crime. It cannot be offset by a mitigating circumstance, and it must be alleged in the
information.
4. Inherent - those that must of necessity accompany the commission of crime. ( evident
premeditation is inherent in robbery, theft, estafa, adultery, concubinage)
Generic Specific
Par. 1 – advantage be taken by the offender of his
public position
Par. 3 – act be committed with insult or in
disregard of the respect due the offended party on
account of his rank, age, or sex
Par. 2 – Crime be committed in contempt of or
with insult to the public authorities
Par. 15 – advantage be taken of superior strength,
or means be employed to weaken the defense
Par. 3 – that it be committed in the dwelling of the
offended party, if the latter has not given
provocation
Par. 16 – act be committed with treachery
(aleviosa)
Par. 4 – the act be committed with abuse of
confidence or obvious ungratefulness
Par. 17 – means be employed or circumstances
brought about which add ignominy to the natural
effects of the act
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
14/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 14
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Par. 5 – the crime be committed in the palace of
the Chief Executive, or in his presence, or where
public authorities are engaged in the discharge of
their duties or in a place dedicated to religious
worship
Par. 21 – the wrong done in the commission of the
crime be deliberately augmented by causing other
wrong not necessary for its commission
Par. 6 – crime be committed in the nighttime, or in
an uninhabited place, or by a band, whenever such
circumstance may facilitate the commission of the
offense
Par. 9 – that the accused is a recidivist
Par. 10 – the offender has been previously
punished for an offense to which the law attaches
an equal or greater penalty or for two or more
crimes to which it attaches a lighter penalty
Par. 14 –that craft, fraud, or disguise be employed
Par. 18 –crime be committed after an unlawful
entry
Par. 19 –that as a means to the commission of a
crime a wall, roof, floor, door, or window be
broken
Par. 20 –crime be committed with the aid of
persons under 15 years of age
Recidivist – one, who at the time of the trial for one crime, shall have been previously convicted
by final judgment of another crime embraced in the same title of this Code.
Reiteracion or Habituality - it is necessary that the offender shall have served out his sentence
for the first offense, previous and subsequent offenses must not be embraced within the same
title of this Code.
Habitual delinquency - a person, within a period of ten years from the date of his release or last
conviction of the crimes of FLERTS (Falsification, Less serious physical injuries, Estafa, Robbery,
Theft, Serious physical injuries) is found guilty of the said crimes a third time or oftener. The
offender is a recidivist or one who has been previously punished for two or more offenses.
Four forms of repetition:
1.
Recidivism
2.
Reiteracion or habituality
3. Multi – recidivism or habitual delinquency : extraordinary aggravating circumstance
4.
Quasi – recidivism : special aggravating circumstance
Craft - use of intellectual trickery or cunning on the part of the accused. Employed as a scheme
in the execution of a plan. Act of the accused was done in order not to arouse suspicion of the
victim.
Fraud – insidious words or machinations used to directly induce the victim to act in a manner
which would enable the offender to carry out his design.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
15/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 15
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Disguise – resorting to any device to conceal identity.
Treachery - offended party was not given an opportunity to make a defense. There is treachery
when the offender commits any of the crimes against person, employing means, methods, or
forms in the execution thereof which tend to directly or specially insure its execution, without
risk to himself arising from the defense which the offended party might make. Deliberate,
sudden, and unexpected attack of the victim from behind, without any warning and without
giving him an opportunity to defend himself or repel the initial assault.
o Applies only to crimes against person
o
Means, methods, or forms need not insure accomplishment of crime – as the law says “to
insure its execution only”
o Mode of attack must be consciously adopted
Accused must make some preparations to kill the deceased
Mode of attack must be thought of by the offender
Characteristic and unmistakable manifestation of treachery: DELIBERATE, SUDDEN,
UNEXPECTED
Requisites of treachery:
At the time of the attack, the victim was not in a position to defend himself
Offender consciously adopted the particular means, method, or form of attack employed by
him.
*killing a child is characterized by treachery, since the weakness of the victim due to his tender
age results in the absence of any danger to the accused.
Ignominy - circumstance pertaining to the moral order, which adds disgrace to the material
injury caused by the crime. Applicable when the crime committed is against chastity. Means
employed must tend to make the effects of a crime more humiliating or to put the offended party to shame. Involves moral suffering. *Applicable when the crime committed is against
chastity.
Nighttime, Uninhabited place, Band
Nighttime - period of darkness beginning at the end of dusk and ending at dawn
*When the place of the crime is illuminated by light, nighttime is not aggravating
When aggravating
When it facilitated the commission of the crime
When especially sought for by the offender to insure the commission of the crime or for the
purpose of impunity
When offender took advantage thereof for the purpose of impunity
Uninhabited place - there are no houses at all, a place at a considerable distance from town
Band - more than three armed malefactors shall have acted together in the commission of the
offense
*it is considered aggravating in crimes against property and in robbery with homicide.
*it does not apply to crimes against chastity
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
16/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 16
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Cruelty
There is cruelty when: the culprit enjoys and delights in making his victim suffer slowly and
gradually, causing him unnecessary physical pain in the consummation of the criminal act;
prolonging the suffering of the victim; refers to physical suffering
Requisites of cruelty
o
The injury caused be deliberately increased by causing other wrong
o The other wrong be unnecessary for the execution of the purpose of the offender
*Number of wounds does not show cruelty.
*For it to be appreciated, wounds should be inflicted while the victim was still alive
*Applies only to crime against persons
V.ALTERNATIVE CIRCUMSTANCE - those which must be taken into consideration as an aggravating or
mitigating circumstance according to the nature and effects if the crime, and the other conditions
attending its commission.
Relationship -
o Mitigating circumstance in crimes against property
o
Aggravating circumstance in crimes against person in which the offended party is arelative of a higher degree than the offender, or when the offended party and the
offender are relatives of the same level.
o
Aggravating circumstance in crimes against chastity, regardless of whether the offender
is a relative of a higher or lower degree of the offended party.
Intoxication –
o Mitigating - if not habitual, or if not subsequent to the commission of the crime
o
Aggravating - if habitual, or if it is intentional.
Degree of instruction and education of the offender
o Mere illiteracy is not sufficient to constitute a mitigating circumstance. There must also
be lack of intelligence.
o
Not mitigating in crimes against property and chastity.o Aggravating when the offender availed himself or took advantage of it in committing the
crime.
PERSONS CRIMINALLY LIABLE FOR FELONIES
Active subject - the criminal; only natural persons can be the active subject because of the highly
personal nature of the criminal responsibility. He alone by his act can set in motion a cause or by his
inaction can make possible the completion of a developing modification in the external world.
o RPC requires that culprit should have acted with personal malice or negligence.
o
A juridical person cannot commit a crime in which a willful purpose or malicious intent isrequired.
o There is a substitution of deprivation of liberty for pecuniary penalties in case of
insolvency of the accused.
o
Other penalties consisting in imprisonment and other deprivation of liberty can be
executed only against individuals.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
17/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 17
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
*A corporation can act only through its officers, and a violation of the law committed by an officer, the
exercise of his duties, he answers criminally for his acts, and not the corporation to which he belongs.
Criminal actions are restricted or limited to the officials of the corporation and never directed against
the corporation.
Passive subject - the injured party.
*Dead and animals have no rights that may be injured; except in the crime of defamation, if the
imputation tends to blacken the memory of one who is dead.
Principals - Those who take a direct part in the execution of the act (principal by direct participation),
those who directly force or induce others to commit it (principal by inducement), and those who
cooperate in the execution of the offense by another act without which it would not have been
accomplished (principal by indispensable cooperation).
Accomplices - persons who, not being included in Article 17, cooperate in the execution of the offense
by previous or simultaneous acts.
Similarity between accomplice and conspirator: both know and agree with the criminal design
Difference between accomplice and conspirator:
o Conspirator –
1.
know the criminal intentions because they themselves have decided such course of
action.
2.
They decide that a crime should be committed.
3.
They are the authors of the crime.
o
Accomplice –
1.
came to know about the criminal intentions after the principals have reached the
decision, and only when they do agree to cooperate in its execution.
2.
They merely concur with the decision of the conspirators and cooperate in itsaccomplishment.
3.
Merely instruments who perform the acts not essential to the perpetration of the
offense.
4.
Does not enter into a conspiracy with the principal by direct participation, and its act is
not indispensable as on the case of the principal by cooperation.
Accomplice acquires knowledge of criminal design when:
a)
The principal informs the accomplice of the former’s criminal plan.
b)
When the accomplice saw the criminal acts of the principal.
Degree of cooperation of the accomplice:
Moral - through advice, encouragement, agreement
Material - through external acts
Accessories - Must have knowledge of the commission of the crime, and having knowledge, he took no
part subsequent to its commission. Took part after the commission of the crime.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
18/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 18
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Accessories distinguished from principals and accomplices
1.
Accessory does not take direct part or cooperate in, or induce, the commission of the crime
2.
Does not cooperate in the commission of the offense by acts either prior to or simultaneous
therewith.
3.
Participation of the accessory takes place after the commission of the crime.
Corpus delicti – “body of the crime”
Two parts of the corpus delicti:
- a crime was committed
-that there was the author of the crime
Article 16
The following are criminally liable for grave or less grave felonies:
o Principals
o Accomplices
o Accessories
The following are criminally liable for light felonies
o
Principals o Accomplices
Rules relative to light felonies:
1.
Light felonies are punishable only when they have been consummated.
2.
But when light felonies are committed against persons or property, they are punishable even if
they are only in the attempted or frustrated stage.
3.
Only principals and accomplices are liable for light felonies.
4.
Accessories are not liable for light felonies, even if they are committed against persons or
property.
Article 17. Principals
Principal by direct participation – those who take a direct part in the execution of the act.
o Requisites:
o They participated in the criminal resolution
o They carried out their plan and personally took part in its execution by acts which
directly tended to the same end.
Principal by induction – those who directly force or induce others to commit it. (autores por
induccion)
o Requisites:
o Inducement be made directly with the intention of procuring the commission of the
crime o Such inducement be the determining cause of the commission of the crime by the
material executor.
Two ways of becoming principal by induction
1.
By directly forcing another to commit a crime
-
Using irresistible force
-
Causing uncontrollable fear
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
19/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 19
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
2.
By directly inducing another to commit a crime
-
By giving price, or offering reward or promise
-
By using words of command
Principal by indispensable cooperation - who cooperated in the commission of the offense by
another act without which it would not have been accomplished.
o Requisites:
o
Participation in the criminal resolution, there is either anterior conspiracy or unity of
criminal purpose and intention immediately before the commission of the crime
charged
o Cooperation in the commission of the offense by performing another act, without which
it would not have been accomplished.
Collective criminal responsibility:
Principals by direct participation have collective criminal responsibility.
Principal by induction, except that who directly forced another to commit a crime, and principal by
direct participation have collective criminal responsibility.
Principal by indispensable cooperation has collective criminal responsibility with principal by directparticipation
Article 18. Accomplice- the persons who, not being included in Art. 17, cooperate in the execution of
the offense by previous or simultaneous acts.
*An accomplice does not enter into a conspiracy with the principal by direct participation. He does not
have a previous agreement with the principal to commit a crime. But he participates to a certain point in
the common criminal design.
Requisites:
That there be community of design (When the principal informs the accomplice of the former’s
criminal purpose or when the accomplice saw the criminal acts of the principal) – Absenceknowledge of the criminal purpose of the principal does not make one an accomplice.
He cooperates in the execution of the offense by previous or simultaneous acts, with the
intention of supplying material or moral aid in the execution of the crime in an efficacious ways
There is relation between the acts done by the principal and those attributed to the person
charged as accomplice.
Article 19. Accessories.
He does not participate in the criminal design, nor cooperate in the commission of the felony, but takes
part in three ways:
By profiting from the effects of the crimeConcealing the body, effects, instruments of the crime in order to prevents its discovery
Assisting in the escape or concealment of the principal of the crime, provided he acts with abuse
of his public functions or the principal is guilty of treason, parricide, murder, or an attempt to
take the life of the Chief Executive, or is known to be habitually guilty of some other crime.
*An accused cannot be held liable as accessory if the principal charged with murder died before the
trial.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
20/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 20
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
*Arraignment, trial and conviction of an accessory after the fact without the principal of the crime
having first been tried and convicted in the separate case is not proper and violates the legal system of
procedural orderliness.
PD 1612. ANTI-FENCING LAW OF 1979
Fencing - act of any person who, with intent to gain for himself or for another, shall buy, receive,
possess, keep, acquire, conceal, sell or dispose of, or shall buy and sell, or in any manner deal in any
article, item, object, or anything of value which he knows, or should have known to him, to have been
derived from the proceeds of the crime of robbery or theft.
Penalties:
o Prision mayor, if the value of the property involved is more than P12,000.00 but not exceeding
P22,000.00; adding 1year for each additional P10k, but not exceeding to 20years.
o Prision correccional in its medium to maximum period, more than P6k, but less than P12k
o Prision correccional, in its minimum to medium, more then P200, but less than P6k
o Arresto mayor, in its medium to prision correccional, over P50.00 but less than P200
o Arresto mayor in medium, over P5.00 but less than P50.00
o
Arresto mayor minimum, less than P5.00
PD 1829 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
*Any person who knowingly or willfully obstructs, impedes, frustrates, or delays the apprehension of
suspects and the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases.
Penalty: prision correccional in its maximum period, or a fine ranging from P1000 to P6000 pesos, or
both
Penalty – suffering inflicted by the State for the transgression of the law.
Theories justifying penalty:Prevention - to prevent or suppress the danger to the State arising from criminal acts
Self defense - as a measure of self defense to protect society from threat and wrong inflicted by
the criminal
Reformation – to correct or reform the offender
Exemplarity - to serve as an example to deter others from committing a crime
Justice - an act of retributive justice
Three-fold purpose of the penalty under this Code:
1.
Retribution – penalty is commensurate with the gravity of the offense
2.
Correction or Reformation - regulate the execution of penalties
3.
Social Defense - inflexible severity to recidivists and habitual delinquents.
Classes of Social Injury:
Social injury - produced by the disturbance and alarm which are the outcome of offense, can be
repaired through the imposition of corresponding penalty
Personal injury - suffered damage to his person, property, honor or chastity, can be repaired through
indemnity and it can be waived.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
21/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 21
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Classification of Penalties:
Principal penalties – expressly imposed by the court in the judgment of conviction
Accessory penalties - deemed included in the imposition of the principal penalties
Nature of penalties:
Deprivation of liberty - death, reclusion, prision , arresto
Restriction of liberty – destierro – not executed by confinement in a penal institution, however,
restricted to enter 25kilometers to 250 kilometers within the vicinity prescribed by the Court
Deprivation of rights - suspension, disqualification
Two types of pardon:
1.
Pardon of the offended party – does not extinguish criminal liability, must come before the
institution of the criminal prosecution.
2.
Pardon of the President – extinguish criminal liability in all crimes.
Two kinds of crime:
1. Public – against the State or country
2.
Private – against private party
Article 22. Retroactive application of penal law:
Penal Law must be favorable to the accused
Accused is not a habitual delinquent
Penal law does not prohibit retroactive application
Article 23. Effect of pardon by the offended party
-it does not extinguish criminal action, except as provided in art. 344
-there may be compromise upon civil liability, but such compromise shall not extinguish the publicaction for the imposition of the legal penalty
*In the crimes of seduction, abduction, rape or acts of lasciviousness, there shall be no criminal
prosecution if the offender has been expressly pardoned by the offended party, but the pardon must
come before the institution of the criminal prosecution. The only act that extinguishes the penal action
after the institution of criminal action is the marriage between the offender and the offended party.
Article 29. Preventive Imprisonment – detention of a person charged with a crime that is non-bailable
or even when the crime is bailable but the accused has no means to bail to attain temporary or
probational liberty.
Pre-Sentence Benefit:
o When the accused had undergone preventive imprisonment for a period equal to or more than
the possible maximum imprisonment of the offense charged to which he may be sentenced and
his case is not yet terminated, he shall be released immediately without prejudice to the
continuation of the trial or the proceeding of the appeal, if the same is under review.
o When maximum penalty to which the accused may be sentenced is destierro, he shall be
released after 30 days of preventive imprisonment.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
22/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 22
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
o Section 16, Rule 114 , Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure – when the accused had undergone
preventive imprisonment equal or more than the minimum possible imprisonment to be
charged, the accused may request for reduction of bail or release on recognizance (accused will
be released even without bail, but wil be under the supervision of a person or character with
good probity)
Post-Sentence Benefit:
o Full-time preventive imprisonment credited on the service of sentence / full deduction of the
preventive imprisonment from the sentence imposed upon the conditions:
1. Had voluntarily signified in writing that he will abide by the same disciplinary rules
imposed upon convicted prisoners
2.
When summoned for the execution of the sentence, he does not fail to surrender
voluntarily
3.
He is not a recidivist, or has not been convicted previously twice or more times of a
crime.
o Four-fifths preventive imprisonment credited on the service of the sentence if the prisoner does
not abide with the disciplinary rules.
Article 34. Civil Interdiction - It shall deprive the offender during the time of his sentence of the rights
of parental authority, or guardianship, either as to person or property of any ward, marital authority,
and the right to manage his property and of his rights to dispose such property by any act or any
conveyance inter vivos.
Deemed to be deprived in cases of principal penalty for:
- death penalty when not executed
- reclusion perpetua
- Reclusion temporal
Article 36. Pardon by the President – shall not work the restoration of the right to hold public office, orthe right of suffrage, unless such rights be expressly restored by the terms of the pardon. It shall not
exempt the culprit from payment of civil indemnity imposed upon him by the sentence.
Limitations: such pardon can only be exercised after the conviction, and does not extend to cases of
impeachment.
*When the principal penalty is remitted by pardon, only the effect of the principal penalty is
extinguished, but not the accessory penalties attached to it. When an absolute pardon is granted after
the term of imprisonment, it removes what is left of the consequences of conviction.
Article 38. Pecuniary Liabilities – in case the property of the offender should not be sufficient for thepayment of all his pecuniary liabilities, the same shall be met in the following order:
1.
Reparation of the damage caused
*No reparation of damages for crime of murder or homicide. Generally, also no
reparation of damage for crime of rape, however, if there are clothing torn, there may
be reparation of damages.
2.
Indemnification of consequential damages
3.
Fine
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
23/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 23
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
4.
Cost of proceedings
Article 39. Subsidiary Penalty – what is suffered by the convict who has no property with which to meet
the fine. It is not an accessory penalty; it is a penalty by itself.
If imposed is prision correctional or arresto and fine – must be expressly included in thesentence imposed upon the convict, otherwise cannot be imposed upon the convict. Subsidiary
imprisonment, not to exceed 1/3 of the term of sentence, and in no case shall continue for more
than one year.
Imposed id fine only – not exceed 6months if culprit is prosecuted for grave or less grave felony,
15 days if for light felony.
Imposed is higher than prision correccional – no subsidiary imprisonment
No confinement in penal institution, but of fixed duration – shall suffer the same deprivation as
those of the principal penalty. Computation follows: subsidiary imprisonment, not to exceed 1/3
of the term of sentence, and in no case shall continue for more than one year.
If financial circumstance of the convict shall improve, he shall still pay the fine. Culprit is not
relieved from paying the fine.
*Determination of the jurisdiction of the Court in criminal cases depends in the extent of the penalty
which the law imposes for the crime charged in the information or complaint. Subsidiary imprisonment
is not essential in the determination of the criminal jurisdiction of a court.
Article 48. Penalty for complex crimes - When a single act constitutes two or more grave or less grave
felonies, or when an offense is a necessary means for committing the other, the penalty for the most
serious crime shall be imposed, and the same must be applied in its maximum period.
Compound crime / Delito Compuesto – single act but constitute two or more offense which should be
grave or less grave felonies. [Art.1, paragraph 1, in case of aberration ictus.]
Principle of absorption of penalty – lesser penalty is absorbed by the more or most serious penalty.
Single impulse doctrine - if the act or acts complained of resulted from a single criminal impulse, it
constitutes a single offense, for if there is no absolute evidence as to the number of persons killed by
each and every one of the appellants, even if the Court is induced to hold each appellant responsible for
each and every death caused by him, it is impossible to carry the desire into effect. [People v. Lawas
(1955)]
*In case of use of armalite rifle, cannot be considered as complex crime, due to the advance mechanism
of the rifle. It will be determined by the number of bullets produced.
Complex crime [proper] / Delito Complejo – an act or felony is a necessary means for committing the
other.
Requisites: at least two offenses are committed, one or some of the offenses are necessary
means for committing the other, and both or all offenses must be punished under the same
statute.
*Light felonies can never be combined with grave or less grave felonies to constitute complex crime.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
24/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 24
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Special complex crime / Composite Crime – made up of more than one crime but under the law, it is
considered as a single indivisible crime. [Robbery with homicide, robbery with rape, and rape with
homicide]
Kinds of plurality of crimes:
1. Formal or ideal plurality – there is one criminal liability in this plurality. Different acts constitute
only one crime because all of the acts performed arioso from one criminal resolution (Delito
Continuado)
Continued or continuous crime / Delito Continuado - offender performs a series of acts violating one
and the same provision of the penal code which is committed at the same place and about the same
time for the same criminal intent or purpose, then these series of acts are taken as one count under the
law. Single offense consisting of several acts, those acts constitutes separate crime, but considering they
are violation of the same provision of the law committed almost at the same time, impelled by the same
criminal intent, only one penalty will be imposed.
*Can be applicable to Male in se (example, estafa). However, separate counts for Mala prohibita
(example, ten counts of violation of BP 22 – Bouncing Checks)
Continuing or Transitory Crime - used in criminal procedure to denote that a certain crime may be
prosecuted and tried not only before the court of the place where it was originally committed or began,
but also before the court of the place where the crime was continued.
2.
Real or material plurality – different crimes in law as well as in the conscience of the offender.
The offender shall be punished for each and every offense that he committed.
Article 49. Penalties to be imposed upon the principals when the crime committed is different from
that intended.
-applies only to cases of mistake of identity.
-lesser penalty is always to be impose, only that it shell be imposed in the maximum period.
-applies only when the intended crime and the crime committed are punished with different penalties.
-if the intended crime and the crime actually committed are punished with the same or equal
penalties, Art. 49 is not applicable.
Articles 50 -57.
Diagram of Application. Consummated Frustrated Attempted
Principals 0 1 2
Accomplices 1 2 3
Accessories 2 3 4
0 – represents the penalty prescribed by law in defining a crime, to be imposed on the principal in a
consummated offense
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
25/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 25
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
*the other figures represent the degrees to which the penalty must be lowered, to meet the different
situations anticipated by law
Exception: Article 60 – The provisions in Arts. 50 -57 shall not be applicable to a case in which the law
expressly prescribes the penalty provided for a frustrated, or attempted felony, or to be imposed upon
accomplices or accessories.
Bases for determination of the extent of penalty to be imposed under the Revised Penal Code:
1.
Stage reached by the crime (attempted, frustrated, consummated)
2.
Participation of the persons liable
3.
Aggravating or Mitigating circumstances attendant to the commission of the crime.
Degree - one entire penalty
Period – one of the three equal portion, called minimum, medium, maximum
Article 59. Penalty imposed upon impossible crimes
-
Arresto mayor or fine ranging from 200 to 500 pesos.
Basis for imposition of proper penalty: 1. Social danger, 2. Degree of criminality shown by the offender
*Art. 59 – limited to cases where the act performed would be grave or less grave felonies.
Article 64.
Outline of the rules:
No aggravating nor mitigating – medium period
Only mitigating – minimum
Only aggravating – maximum When there are 2 aggravating circumstances and no mitigating, penalty prescribed should be
imposed in its maximum.
o
Whatever may be the number and nature of the aggravating circumstance, the courts
may not impose a greater penalty than that prescribed by law in its maximum period.
*Mitigating circumstance must be ordinary, not privilege.
*Aggravating circumstance must be generic or specific, not qualifying or inherent.
*Qualifying Circumstance cannot be offset by a generic mitigating circumstance.
When mitigating and aggravating circumstances not considered in the imposition of the penalty:
1.
When penalty is single and indivisible (Indivisible penalties are: Death, Reclusion Perpetua,Public Censure)
2.
In felonies through negligence
3. Penalty to be imposed upon a Moro or other non-Christian inhabitants.
4. When penalty is only a fine imposed by an ordinance
5. When the penalties are prescribed by special law.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
26/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 26
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Privilege Mitigating Circumstances:
Article 68: Minority
Article 69: Incomplete Justifying/Exempting Circumstance
*Unlawful aggression must always be present; without it, the two other requisite cannot apply.
*Not all the requisite to justify/exempt, provided that the majority are present, offender is privilege to a
penalty lower or 2 degree lower than the penalty stated in the law
*If only two requisites are required, the presence of the first requisite is already a majority.
Article 89. Total extinction of criminal liability
1.
By death of the convict
2.
By service of sentence
3.
By amnesty
4.
By absolute pardon
5.
By prescription of the crime
6.
By prescription of penalty
7.
By marriage of the offended woman (Art. 344, RPC)
*Extinction of criminal liability does not necessarily mean that the civil liability is also extinguished.
Causes of extinction of criminal liability arise after the commission of the offense
Causes of justification or exemption from criminal liability arise from the circumstance existing before
the commission of the crime or at the moment of its commission.
Amnesty – sovereign act granting oblivion or general pardon for past acts, granted by a government
generally to a class of persons who are subject to trial and have not been convicted, usually of political
offenses.
*Amnesty wipes out all traces and vestiges of the crime, it does not extinguish the civil liability of theoffender.
Pardon – an act of grace proceeding from the power entrusted with the execution of laws which
exempts the individual on whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for the crime he
has committed.
Amnesty Pardon
Blanket pardon to classes of persons or
communities who may be guilty of political
offenses.
Includes any crime and is exercised individually by
the President.
May be exercised even before trial orinvestigation.
Exercised when the person is already convicted.
Looks backward and abolishes and puts into
oblivion the offense itself.
Looks forward and relieves the offender from the
consequences of an offense of which he has been
convicted.
Amnesty makes an ex-convict no longer a
recidivist; it obliterates the last vestige of the
crime.
Pardon does not alter the fact that the accused is a
recidivist; it produces the extinction only of the
personal effects of penalty.
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
27/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 27
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Proclamation of the President with the
concurrence of Congress, is a public act of which
the courts should take judicial notice.
A private act of the President, must be pleaded
and proved by the person pardoned.
Article 90. Prescription of crimes.
Prescription of the crime – loss or forfeiture of the right of the State to prosecute the offender after the
lapse of a certain time.
Punishment for the crime: Prescription of crime :
Death, reclusion perpetua, reclusion temporal 20 years
By other afflictive penalties (Prision mayor,
Perpetual or temporary absolute disqualification,
Perpetual or temporary special disqualification)
15 years
By correctional penalty, except arresto mayor
(Prision correccional, Suspension, Destierro)
10 years
By arresto mayor 5 years
Libel or other similar offenses 1 year
Oral defamation and slander by deed 6 months
Light offenses (Arresto menor, Public censure) 2 months
*Grave slander prescribes in 6 months. Simple slander prescribes in 2 months.
*Where the penalty fixed by law is a compound one, the highest penalty shall be made the basis of the
application of the rules contained therein.
Crimes punishable by Fine: Prescription of the crime:
Afflictive (exceeds 6,000 pesos) 15 years
Correctional ( does not exceed 6,000 pesos but isnot less than 200 pesos)
10 years
Light (less than 200 pesos) 2 months
Offenses punished under
special laws and municipal ordinances:
Prescription:
By fine, or by imprisonment for not more than 1
month
1 year
By imprisonment for more than 1 month, but less
than 2 years
4 years
By imprisonment for 2 years or more but lessthan 6 years
8 years
By imprisonment for 6 years or more 12 years
Offenses under Internal Revenue Law 5 years
Violations of Municipal Ordinances 2 months
Violations of the regulations or conditions of
certificate of convenience by the Public Service
2 months
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
28/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 28
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
Commission
*Prescription shall begin to run from the day of the commission of the violation of the law, and if the
same be not known at the time, from the discovery thereof and the institution of judicial proceedings
for its investigation and punishment.*Where an accused has been found to have committed a lesser offense includible within the offense
charged, he cannot be convicted of the lesser offense, if it has already been prescribed.
Outline of the provisions:
1.
Period of prescription commences to run from the day on which the crime is discovered by the
offended party, the authorities or their agents.
2.
It is interrupted by the filing of the complaint.
3.
It commences to run again when such proceedings terminate without the accused being
convicted or acquitted or are unjustifiably stopped for any reason not imputable to him.
4.
The term of prescription shall not run when the offender is absent from the Philippines.
*Prescriptive period of continuing crime, cannot begin to run because there could be no termination ofcontinuity and the crime does not end.
*The act of testifying falsely against the defendant does not constitute an actionable offense until the
principal case is finally decided.
*False Testimony in favor of the defendant, there is a specific penalty which does not depend on the
conviction or acquittal of the defendant.
Article 92. When and how penalties prescribed:
Prescription of the penalty – loss or forfeiture of the right of the government to execute the final
sentence after the lapse of a certain time.
Two conditions necessary in prescription of penalty:1.
That there be final judgment
2.
The period of time prescribed by law for its enforcement has elapsed.
Penalties imposed: Prescription of penalty
Death and reclusion perpetua 20 years
Other afflictive penalty (reclusion temporal,
absolute/special disqualification, prision mayor)
15 years
Correctional penalties, except arresto mayor
(prision correccional, suspension, destierro)
10 years
Arresto mayor 5 years
Light penalties (Arresto menor, public censure) 1 year
Article 93. Prescription of penalties.
Elements:
1.
Penalty imposed by final sentence;
2.
The convict evaded the service of the sentence by escaping during the term of his sentence;
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
29/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 29
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
3.
Convict who escaped from prison has not given himself up, or been captured, or gone to a
foreign country with which Philippines have no extradition treaty, or committed another crime;
4.
Penalty has prescribed, because of the lapse of the time from the date of the evasion of the
service of the sentence by the convict.
*Art. 93 applies only to those who are convicted by final judgment and are serving the sentence which
consists in deprivation of liberty.
*Period for prescription of penalties begins only when the convict evades service of sentence by
escaping during the term of his sentence.
*Acceptance of conditional pardon also interrupts the prescriptive period.
Article 94. Partial extinction of criminal liability
1.
By conditional pardon;
2.
By commutation of the sentence;
3.
For good conduct allowances which the culprit may earn while he is serving his sentence.
Conditional Pardon - when delivered and accepted is considered a contract between the sovereign
power of the executive and the convict that the former will release the latter upon compliance with thecondition.
Commutation of sentence – change in the decision of the court made by the President by reducing the
degree of the penalty inflicted upon the convict, or by decreasing the length of the imprisonment or the
amount of the fine.
When commutation is provided:
Convict sentenced to death is over 70 years old
When 8 justices of SC failed to reach a decision for the affirmance of the death penalty.
For good conduct allowances - a prisoner is entitled to special time allowance for loyalty. A deduction
of 1/5 period of his sentence is granted to a loyal prisoner.
Parole - consists in the suspension of the sentence of a convict after serving the minimum term of the
indeterminate penalty, without granting a pardon, prescribing the terms upon which the sentence shall
be suspended.
INDETERMINATE SENTENCE LAW (Act No. 413)
- applies only to penalty of imprisonment; there must be conviction through final judgment.
- does not apply to non-divisible penalties.
- application of ISLAW is mandatory where imprisonment would exceed one year.
Purpose of ISLAW: To uplift and redeem valuable human material, and prevent unnecessary and
excessive deprivation of personal liberty and economic freedom
This Act shall not apply to persons: (Categories)
A. As to Penalty actually imposed upon the offender
- offenses punished with death penalty or life imprisonment
- those whose maximum term of imprisonment does not exceed one year
- penalty served outside prison : suspension, destierro
B. As to Nature of crime the accused if convicted of
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
30/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 30
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
- those convicted of treason, conspiracy, or proposal to commit treason
- those convicted of misprision of treason, rebellion, sedition or espionage
- those convicted of piracy
*PREMPTS: Piracy, Rebellion, Espionage, Misprision of treason, Proposal and conspiracy to
commit treason, Treason, Sedition
C. As to Nature of the Offender
- those who are habitual delinquents
- who shall have escaped from confinement or evaded sentence
- who violated the terms of the conditional pardon granted by the President
- those already sentenced by a final judgment at the time of the approval of this Act
- supposed to be sentenced of Death, but due to RA9346, penalty is commuted to Reclusion
Perpetua
Minimum of IsLaw:
- One degree next lower to the penalty prescribed for the offense. It is determined without considering
the attending circumstances to the penalty prescribed, and is left to the discretion of the court.
- To give convict the grace period by which while serving the sentence, the Board of Pardon and Parole
will determine whether he is morally, physically, mentally fit to be released subject to certain conditions.
Maximum of IsLaw:
- Penalty imposed as provided by law, depending upon the attending circumstances.
- To make the offender serve the maximum term if he violates the terms and conditions attached to the
parole, if he violates it, or if he is determined not to be fit for release on parole.
NOTE:
* If penalty will not exceed Prision correccional, no need to apply for IsLaw, rather apply for Probation.
* If the penalty imposed is Reclusion Perpetua, IsLaw cannot be granted.
PROBATION LAW (PD 968)
Purpose:- promote the correction and rehabilitation of an offender by providing him with individualized
treatment
- provide an opportunity for the reformation of a penitent offender which might be less
probable if he were to
serve as prison sentence
- prevent the commission of the crime
Probation - disposition under which a defendant, after conviction and sentence, is released subject to
conditions
imposed by the court and to the supervision of a probation officer; only affects the criminal
aspect of the case.
Grant of Probation: Categories: No application for probation must be entertained if there was an appeal
filed by the said accused.
*Must be filed with 15 days from the promulgation of judgement
Probation shall not be extended to:
-
8/20/2019 Criminal Law 1 Jona Notes
31/32
N o t e s o n C R I M I N A L L A W I ( F i s c a l N e l s o n S a l v a ) | 31
Prepared by: Alcazar, Jona May M. (1st Sem 2012 -2013)
1. those sentenced to serve a maximum term of imprisonment of more than 6 years
2. those convicted of subversion or any crime against the national security or public order, even not
exceeding more
than 6years of imprisonment
3. were previously convicted by final judgment of an offense punished by not less than one month and
one day, and
fine not more than 200pesos
4. who have been once on probation
5. who are already serving sentence at the time the provision of the decree became applicable
How long a convict may be placed on probation:
- term of imprisonment of not more than 1 year – probation shall not exceed 2 years
- term of imprisonment of more than 1 year – probation shall not exceed 6 years
- Fine only and to offender made to serve subsidiary imprisonment – shall be twice the total number of
days of subsidiary imprisonment.
Conditions of Pardon:
-Mandatorya. present himself to the probation officer designated to undertake his supervision at
such place as may
be specified in the order within 72 hours from receipt of said order
b. report to the probation officer at least once a month at such time and place as
specified by the order
-Discretionary - refer to p.819 (RPC, Reyes) or p.221(Codal)
Article 100. Civil liability of a person guilty of felony. – EVERY PERSON CRIMINALLY LIABLE FOR A
FELONY IS ALSO CIVILLY LIABLE
When there are victims of the crime Under the Civil Code, crime is one of the sources of obligation
Two classes of injuries.
Social injury - produced by the disturbance and alarm which are the outcome of the offense,
sought to be repaired through the imposition of the corresponding penalty.
Personal injury – caused to the victim of the crime who may have suffered damage. Sought to
be reoaired through indemnity.
Basis of civil liability: obligation of everyone to repair or to make whole