crime report 2006

8/7/2019 CRIME REPORT 2006

1/65

Crime Report 2006COLOMBIANNATIONAL POLICE DIJIN

COLOMBIAN NATIONAL POLICE

CRIME REPORT

2006


2/65


INDEX

Page

Presentation 3

Social Impact Offenses 4

I. Murders 5

II. Traffic fatalities 9

III. Personal injuries 12

IV. Traffic injuries 15

V. Thefts 17

VI. Motor-vehicle thefts 20

VII. Highway Banditry 22

VIII. Kidnappings 24

IX. Mass kidnappings 25

X. Extortion 27

XI. Terrorist actions 28

XII. Subversive actions 31

Colombian National Police Operational Achievements 33

I. Arrests related to all crimes 34

II. Recovered and seized merchandise 35

III. Recovered Motor-vehicles 35

IV. Illicit drugs seizures 37

V Expropriation 37


3/65


PRESENTATION

This annual comparative report brings criminal statistics recorded by the Colombian National

Police (CNP), to provide a comprehensive account of the different achievements that have been

reached in rural and urban scenarios, leading to the reduction of the main high impact crimes

that affect the Colombian society.

Although the present report reflects the latest patterns and trends of crime during 2006

compared to 2005 figures, it is important to emphasize that the decrease in violence and

delinquency indicators have been reached not just as a consequence of the current situation but

due to the coherent and systematic work of the National Government, through the

implementation of the Defense and Security Policy, oriented to recover the countrys credibility

and to generate a peaceful coexistence among citizens.

The first part of the study is related to offenses which affect the democratic security of the

Nation and the colombian citizens safety which includes the analysis of thirteen different types

of offenses and their variables. The second part is focused in the operative achievements

reached by CNP, including items such as arrests for all crimes, recovered and seized

merchandise, drugs and cars, as well as information about expropriation, as a result of the

governments struggle against illicit drugs.

This Crime Report is an important source of information for those interested in the dynamics of

delinquency in Colombia, since it enables them to corroborate for example, the reductions

recorded during 2006 compared with 2005 figures, in the total number of homicides, extortionand kidnapping, of 3%, 5% and 14%, respectively; offenses of high importance for the

international community as they generate expectations of certainty for making better decisions.

In a joint effort the Colombian National Police and the Military Forces have fought against all


4/65


SOCIAL IM PACT OFFENSES

2005 2006 ABSOLUTE % 2005 2006 2005 2006

16.407 15.430 -977 -6% 45 42 35 33ONDUTY 189 149 -40 -21% 1 0 0 0OUT OF SERVICE 57 43 -14 -25% 0 0 0 0

432 462 30 7% 1 1 1 1

1.026 1.395 369 36% 3 4

2 3TOTAL 18.111 17.479 -632 -3% 50 48 39 37

48 37 -11 -23% 0 0 0 0

252 193 -59 -23% 1 1 1 0

3.889 4.057 168 4% 11 11 8 9

373 688 315 84% 1 2 1 1

4.262 4.745 483 11% 12 13 9 10

377 282 -95 -25% 1 1 1 1

423 405 -18 -4% 1 1 1 1

800 687 -113 -14% 2 2 2 1

1.739 1.652 -87 -5% 5 5 4 4

486 527 41 8% 1 1 1 1

126 119 -7 -6% 0 0 0 0

612 646 34 6% 2 2 1 1

4 2 -2 -50% 0 0 0 0

8 7 -1 -13% 0 0 0 0

13 7 -6 -46% 0 0 0 0

100 65 -35 -35% 0 0 0 0

31 16 -15 -48% 0 0 0 0

1 0 -1 -100% 0 0 0 038 21 -17 -45% 0 0 0 0

73 49 -24 -33% 0 0 0 0

268 167 -101 -38% 1 0 1 0

25.419 24.688 -731 -3% 70 68 54 53

2005 2006 ABSOLUTE % 2005 2006 2005 2006

30.403 46.496 16.093 53% 85 127 65 99

10.059 13.134 3.075 31% 28 36 22 2841.271 54.829 13.558 33% 116 150 88 117

14.797 20.245 5.448 37% 41 55 32 43

13.572 16.258 2.686 20% 38 45 29 35

69.640 91.332 21.692 31% 195 250 149 195

9.961 9.246 -715 -7% 28 25 21 20

9 016 10 531 1 515 17% 25 29 19 23

IMPACT OFFENSES THAT AFFECT

DEMOCRATIC SECURITY

PERIOD FRON JANUARY 1st TODECEMBER 31st

VARIATION DAILY AVERAGE

MURDER

CIVILIANS

NATIONAL POLICE

PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL FROM MILITARY FORCES AND

SECURITY ORGANIZATIONS

KNOCKED DOWN ANTISOCIALS BY PUBLIC

FORCE AND SECURITY ORGANIZATIONS

MASS

MURDERS

CASES

VICTIMS

TRAFFIC

FATALITIES

HOMICIDES

DEATHS

TOTAL

KIDNAPPING

EXTORSIVE

SIMPLE

TOTAL

EXTORTION

TERRORISM

ACTIVATED DEVICES

DEACTIVATED DEVICES

TOTAL

SUBVERSIVE

ACTIONS

GUERRILLA ASSAULT ON TOWNS

ATTACKS AGAINTS POLICE AIRCRAFTS

ATTACKS AGAINTS POLICE INSTALLATIONS

GUERRILLA HARASSMENT

AMBUSH

GUERRILLAINCURSION INTO TOWNS

ARMEDCOMBAT

ILLEGAL CHECKPOINTS

TOTALSUBTOTAL IMPACT OFFENSES THAT AFFECT

DEMOCRATIC SECURITY

OFFENSES THAT AFFECT CITIZEN`S

SAFETY

PERIOD FRON JANUARY 1st TO

DECEMBER 31stVARIATION

MOTORCYCLES

PERSONAL INJURIES

TRAFFIC INJURIES

THEFT

STREET ROBBERY

BURGLARY

COMMERCIAL THEFTS

TOTAL

RATE PER 100.000INHABITANTS

RATE PER 100.000

INHABITANTSDAILY AVERAGE

MOTOR-

VEHICLE

AUTO THEFT


5/65


I . MURDER

Murders (1 986-2006 )

17.

479

18.

111

2

0.

210

17.

450

21.

129

23.

384

24.

308

28.

284

28.

224

28.

173

26.

828

25.

398

26.

642

25.

379

23.

096

24.

358

26.

540

27.

840

28.

837

23.

523

15.

74

3

0

20.000

40.000

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

National volume, trends and rates.

Total homicides

1.4421.5431.569

1.460

1.5811.4761.4571.424

1.5791.537

1.439

1.604

1.3991.482

1.529

1.4041.335

1.4501.425

1.310

1.493 1.498

1.514

1.640

1.000

1.500

2.000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2005= 18,111 2006= 17,479


6/65


with 1.529 and 1.640 cases respectively; while February showed the lowest one.

Besides, 149 police officers were killed while on duty during 2006, which means 40fewer than in 2005.

23.523

20.210 18.111 17.479

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

2003 2004 2005 2006

Total murders

The 2006 data showed a significant 26% decrease while comparing to the 2003 data,falling from 23.523 murders in 2003, to 17.479 cases in 2006.

17861739

1774 17261669

1372

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Homicides

Valle M. Cali M. Bogot

Most affected zones per frequency

2005

2006

Although the Valle province and metropolitan areas of Cali and Bogot were the mostaffected zones during 2006, with 1.739, 1.726 and 1.372 murders respectively, the 2006


7/65


67

107

80

101

142

96

0

40

80

120

160

Homicides

Putumayo Guaviare Arauca

Most affected zones (Rate per 100,000 inhabitants )

2005

2006

During 2006 Putumayo province was the most affected zone according to the rate per100.000 inhabitants with 107 victims, 40 more than those in the previous year, followedby Guaviare province with 101 victims and Arauca province which showed a decrease of

32% while comparing with the 2005 figures, falling from 142 to 96 cases.

Types of weapons used

15%

5%

80%

Firearms

Knives or cutting instruments

Others

During the year 2006, 80% of the murders were committed with firearms and 15% withknives or cutting instruments; the remaining 5% of the offenses were committed withother weapons such as clubs and blunt objects, among others.

A breakdown of the data by gender showed that 92% of the total homicide victims weremale and 8% were female during 2006 the same proportion that was reported during


8/65


1.492

16.610

1.323

16.118

0

8.000

16.000

24.000

2005 2006

Murder victim's by sex

Female Male Unknown

Classifying by age, the largest amount of murders during 2006 corresponded to peoplewhose age was rated from 18 to 25, which equals to 29% or 5.096 offenses. The

second place was found on people whose age was rated from 26 to 34, which equals to28%. The fewest number of murders was reported on population under 18 and over 56years old, which corresponded to 5% both of them or 921 and 808 cases respectively.

Murder victims by age

5%

29%

28 %

22%

8% 5%3%

Under 18

From 18 to 25

From 26 to 34

From 35 to 45

From 46 to 55

Over 56

Unknown


9/65


Murders classiffied by hour of occurence

33%24%

23%20%

00 - 06

06 - 12.

12 - 18.

18 - 00

I I . TRAFFIC FATALITIES

National volume, trends and rates

Total traffic fatalit ies

393

315277

322

353382

291

289

325341

250

351386

353399385

329370

278

317

320273

296

351

100

200

300

400

500


2005 = 3.889 2006 = 4.057


10/65


473

396

308244

0

200

400

600

M. Bogot M. Cali M. Medelln Cundinamarca

Traffic fatalities - most affected zones

2006

During 2006, the metropolitan area of Bogot reported the largest amount of fatalitiesas a consequence of traffic accidents, with 473 cases, followed by the metropolitanareas of Cali and Medelln and the Cundinamarca province with 396, 308 and 244deaths, respectively.

Though, Bogot reported the largest amount of traffic fatalities in 2006, whilecomparing this number with the occurrences of this offense in 2005, there was afavorable decrease of 4%, which equals to 20 fewer cases.

Traffic fatalities by t ype o f mot or-vehicle

61%

18%

21%

Vehicle

Motorcycle

Unknown


11/65


832

3.054

866

3.185

0

2.000

4.000

2005 2006

Traffic fatality victims' sex

Female Male

Analyzing the 2006 information by gender, the statistics reported that 79% of thesedeaths corresponded to male victims, which equals to 3.185 cases and 21% (866)corresponded to female victims.

Comparing 2006 with 2005, there was an increase of 4% in the number of male victimswhich equals to 131 more victims and a 4% increase in the number of female victimswhich equals to 34 more cases.

Traffic fatalit ies by day

22%14%

11%

18%

13%

11%

11%

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Saturday

Sunday

During 2006, Saturday and Sunday recorded the highest percentage of occurrence, with


12/65


A breakdown of the data by hour of occurrence showed that most of the traffic fatalities

took place from 6:00 pm to midnight (31%) in 2006 while in 2005 most of the trafficfatalities were reported from midday to 6:00 pm. On the other hand, the fewest numberof deaths occurred from midnight to 6:00 am, since there is not so much traffic duringthat time.

Traffic fatalities by hour of occurence

27%

31 %

24%

18 %00 - 06

06 - 12.

12 - 18.

18 - 00

III. PERSONAL INJURIES


Personal i njuries

3.343

2.6682.7852.5962.3422.3172.0532.301

2.2692.6712.607 2.451

4.3713.812

4.2064.0633.9373.8013.7303.518

3.7213.997

3.725 3.615

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000


2005 = 30,403 2006 = 46,496


13/65


The daily average on 2006 was 127which equal to 45 more wounds than the previous

year, and 99 cases per 100.000 inhabitants.

7.370

4.312 4.234

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

M. Bogot M. Cali Valle

Most affected zones

2006

The most affected zones by this offense during 2006 were the metropolitan areas ofBogot and Cali with 7.370 cases that represent 16% of participation, and 4.312 casesthat represent 9% of participation respectively. In third place Valle province was ratedwith 4.234 cases and 9% of participation, which represents an increase of 2.885 casescompared with the previous year.

Motives and causes of personal injuri es

1%

39%

5%

43%

2%

10%

Murder for hire

Assault

Personal vengeance

Quarrels

Family problems

Others


14/65


Types of weapons used

12%53%

22%

13%

Fire arms

Knives or cutting instruments

Clubs, blunt objects

Others

In contrast to murders, in which most of the offenses were committed with firearms, inthis offense, the most common weapons used to commit the crime during 2006 wereclubs and blunt objects, with a participation of 53% and 24.769 cases, repeating the

same pattern of 2005. In second place, the statistics reported the use of knives orcutting instruments with a participation of 22%. The use of firearms in this crimereported an increase of 9% when comparing 2006 with 2005 data, going up from 5.548cases in 2005 to 6.042 cases during 2006.

Personal injuries by hour of occurence

32%

25%

23%

20%

00 - 06

06 - 12.

12 - 06.

06 - 00

During 2006 the highest percentage of personal injuries occurred from 6:00 p.m. tillmidnight, with a participation of 32% and 14.980 cases, the same situation that took


15/65


Personal injuries by day24%

17% 12%

14%

11%11%

11%

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Saturday

Sunday

During 2006, Saturday and Sunday recorded the highest percentage of occurrence, witha participation of 17% and 24%, which equals to 7.828 and 11.232 cases, respectively.

IV. TRAFFIC INJUR IES


Total traffi c injuries

960817

741801763

606 852776

953978928884

1.1691.1131.1191.0091.041988947954

1.2351.155

1.020

1.384

500

750

1000

1250

1500


2005 = 10.059 2006 = 13.134

In 2006 occurrences of this offense increased 31% compared with the 2005 figure


16/65


3.697

2.946

495

954

310

890483

875

0

2000

4000

M. Bogot Santander Valle Caldas

Most affected zones

2005

2006

Police departments that recorded the highest amount of cases during 2006 were theBogot metropolitan area, with 2.946 cases, and a 20% decrease when comparing with

the same period in the previous year, Santander province, 954 cases and a 93%increase, Valle province, 890 cases and a 187% increase, and Caldas province, 875cases and 81% increase.

Traffic injuries by type of motor - vehicle

4082; 31%

6257; 48%

2795; 21%

Automobiles

Motorcycles

Unknown

Analyzing the amount of injuries according with the type of vehicle which caused them


17/65


V. THEFTS


Total thefts

6.4336.3355.783

5.0605.0935.1615.5935.7675.709 6.179 6.060 6.471

8.3787.824

7.1937.5877.394 7.6847.540

7.0077.155

8.2867.908

7.376

4000

5000

60007000

8000

9000


2005= 69.640 2006= 91.332

During 2006, a total of 91.332 thefts were committed, reporting an increase of 31%when we compare whit the 69.640 thefts committed the previous year or 21.692 morecases. The increase in this offense was caused especially by the greater impact of theftsto persons which increased 33%, reporting 13.558 more cases when comparing with2005 data.

From Februrary to September 2006, there was an upward trend reaching the highest

amount of thefts in that month (8.378). From September onwards the number of theftsstarted falling until December.

As we can see in the chart the lowest numbers of cases were reached in January andFebruary with 7.155 and 7.007 cases respectively.

Theft - rate per 10 0.00 0 inhabitants

91.332

195

149

121140 139

12280.000

100.000

150

200

Theft - rate per 100 .000 inhabitants

91.332

195

149

121140 139

12280.000

100.000

00

150

200


18/65


The theft-rate per 100.000 inhabitants reported an upward trend from the year 2000

until 2002 when it was 140, and remained in that level until the year 2003, starting fromthat time to diminish, reaching a rate of 122 in 2004. However, from 2004 onwards,there has been a continuous rise in the rate per 100.000 inhabitants which was 149byDecember 31st, 2005 and went up to 195 in 2006.

The daily theft average during 2006 was 256, which means, 61 more daily cases thanthose reported during the previous year.

When comparing the 2006 data to 2002, there was an increase of 48% with 91.332cases. During 2004 there were 55.086 thefts, 6.875 fewer cases than those recorded in

2003.

22.970 22.430

2.524

10.710

3.3916.078

0

5000

10000

1500020000

25000

30000

Theft

s

M. Bogot M. Cali Cundinamarca

Most affected zones

20052006

Police departments that recorded the largest amount of thefts were the Metropolitan Area of Bogot with 22.430 cases and a decrease of 2% or 540 fewer cases, whencomparing them with the same period in the previous year, the MetropolitanArea of Caliwith 10.710 cases and a meaningful increase of 324% and Cundinamarca province who

reported 6.078 cases and an increase of 79%.

41 271

54.82960.000

Thefts by category


19/65


Analyzing the number of thefts by categories during 2006, the high participation of 60%

corresponding to thefts to persons is indeed evident, which equals to 54.829 casesduring 2006, reporting a remarkable increase of 33% comparing it with 2005 data, inwhich 41.271 thefts to persons were reported.

Home theft increased 37% going up from 14.797 to 20.245 cases, theft to commerceincreased 20% which equals to 2.686 more cases.

Total thefts and methods17%

36% 3%

14%

Assault Carelessness Breaking and Entering Others

When analyzing the methods employed by the thieves in order to steal peoples propertyin 2006, we can notice the same pattern recorded during the previous year in whichassault on persons was rated in first place, with a participation of 36% of the total

thefts; the carelessness of the people was the second cause that made easier for therobbers to assault their victims (17%). The category of forcing locks was ranked in thirdplace, with 14% participation.

Types of weapons

10%

19%

24%

Firearms

Without weapons

Knives and cutting objects

Clubs, blunt objects

Others


20/65


weapons such as clubs and blunt objects among others and the remaining 23% did not

specify information about the type of arms used.

Burglaries by range of hour

27%

30%22%

21%

From 00 to 06

From 06 to 12.

From 12 to 18.

From 18 to 24.

ccording to the hour of occurrence of these offenses, 30% of the burglaries occurred

I. MOTOR-VEHICLE THEFTS

ational volume, trends and rates

Aduring daytime, from midday until 6:00 pm. The least amount of burglaries wascommitted from midnight to 6:00 a.m. (21%).

VN

30.22727.554

22.640

18.977 19.777

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Total motor-vehicle thefts


21/65


Total mot or-vehicle t hefts

1.3941.5731.5131.499

1.411

1.5961.5591.628

1.693

1.681

1.708

1.722

1.359

1.6001.5641.6051.686

1.7891.748

1.6621.703

1.649

1.711

1.701

1.200

1.600

2.000


2005= 18977 2006= 19777

When comparing statistical records we can notice that the frequency of this crimeincreased of 800 more cases, which indicates a variation of 4%.

According to the 2006 data, from January to May, there was a slight downward trend inthe number of motor-vehicle thefts, followed by increases during the next two monthsreaching the highest pick of the year in July with 1.789 cases.

Despite this increase in July, there was a notorious downward trend in the secondsemester of 2006, falling to 1.359 cases by December 31st, which means 35 fewer casescompared with the figure of the previous year.

The daily average during 2006 was 55, or 2 more cases per day than those reported in2005.

5.869

4.829

2.138

3.125 3.435 3.028

2500

5000

7500

Motor-vehiclethe

fts

Most affected zones


22/65


When comparing 2006 with 2005, the figures reported decreases of 18% and 12% in

the metropolitan areas of Bogot and Medelln, while there was an increase of 46%thefts in the metropolitan area of Cali of 46%.

Analyzing the information by categories, there was a decrease related to auto-thefts(7%) falling from 9.961 stolen cars during 2005 to 9.246 in 2006 while the motorcyclesshowed a 17% increase going up from 9.016 stolen motorcycles in 2005 to 10.531 in2006.

9.961 9.246 9.01610.531

0

4000

8000

12000

16000

Vehicles Motorcycles

Motor-vehicles theft

2005

2006

VII. HIGHWAY BANDITRY


1.4361.5782000

2500

Highway banditry


23/65


here was a decrease of 6% regarding this offense, when comparing the years 2005nd 2006, falling from 713 cases during the first year to 671 during the second year,hich means 42 fewer cases.

ebruary reported the highest peak, 73 cases, followed by November with 72 cases. Theccurrence of highway banditry throughout the Nation in 2006 was estimated at a ratef 2 cases per day, the same figure recorded in 2005.

Total highway banditry

55

74

53

54

4145

69

52

49

64

88

6956

72

62

47

5649

54

63

3952

73

48

10

60

110

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec2005= 713 2006= 671

171

131

49

96

149

79

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

M. Bogot M. Cali M. Medelln

Most affected zones highway banditry

2005

2006

TawFoo

The roads of metropolitan areas of Bogot, Cali and Medelln, with 131, 96 and 79 casesrespectively, were the most affected zones during 2006.


24/65


VIII. KIDNAPP INGS


2.9862.200

1.440

800687

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Total kidnappings

The 2006 data showed a significant reduction of 77% in this crime, falling from 2.986cases in 2002 to 687 cases in 2006.

Total kidnappings

180

3453

547567

85

5755

737894

75

3047

567576

47

5863

605655

120

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

6460

0Jan Feb Mar Apr May

This crime showed a significant decrease of 14%, which is equivalent to 113 fewercases, with a daily average of 2 cases per day in 2006 (the same figure recorded in2005).

2005= 800 2006= 687


25/65


During the year 2006 the most affected zones of the country by this crime, were themetropolitan area of Bogot (75 cases) an the provinces of Meta (75 cases), Tolima

ld like to point out that in Cauca province, this criminal activity decreased 30%

75 75

5845 44 42

0

35

70

105

140

Kidnappings

M. Bogot Meta Tolima Cundinamarca Antioquia Cauca

st affected zonesMo

d

(58 cases), Cundinamarca and Antioquia, with 45 and 44 cases respectively, and Caucaprovince with 42 cases.

e wouWfalling from 60 cases in 2005, to 42 cases in 2006. In Cundinamarca province itdecreased 22%, in Meta province it fell 13% (from 86 to 75 cases). In contrast, themetropolitan area of Bogot reported a significant increase of 108%.

IX. MASS KIDNAPPINGS

2006

30

114

12

41

50

100

150

200

Mass kidnappings

Cases

Victims


26/65


taken within the total kidnappings. From 1999 onwards, due to the intensity andmagnitude of its occurrences, this offense started to be registered in a separate way,

aching its highest peak in 2001 and keeping a downward trend until 2006.

with t

According to the figures shown in the graph, 33% of the kidnappings were committedy the FARC, (the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) 25% were attributable to

ommon delinquency, 33% were committed by the subversive group ELN, (The National

re

Massi ve ki dnappings - Offenders33%

25%33%

9%

ELN

FARC

Common Delinquency

Unknown

During 2006 there were 12 cases and 41 victims, which represents a 60% decrease inthe total number of cases and a 64% decrease in the total number of victims, compared

he previous year data.

b

cLiberation Army). In 9% of the cases, there was no information about the offenders.

C i R t 2006


27/65


Total ex tortion

70111118

140

139

139149167

204

174144

184

69104

134

109

150

117135156145

192160

18180

160

240

320

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dic

0

2005= 1739 2006= 1652

. EXTORTION

data.

XNational volume, trends and rates

This crime, which affects directly the coexistence and citizens safety, has recorded adecline of 5% with a difference of 87 fewer cases during 2006 compared with the 2005

A breakdown of the data by months showed that January and March reported thehighest peaks with 181 and 192 cases while November and December reported thelowest figures, with 104 and 69 cases, respectively.

2.512 2.274 2.351

1.739 1.652

0

700

1400

2100

2800

3500

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Extort ion

Crime Report 2006


28/65


rded drops

During 2006, Meta provice and the metropolitan area of Bogot, recorded the highestfrequencies of this offense, with 145 and 130 cases respectively, followed by

Cundinamarca and Huila provinces, with 124 cases of extortion each one. Whencomparing the 2006 data with 2005, Meta and Cundinamarca provinces showedincreases of 8%, 114%, while the metropolitan area of Bogot and Huila recoof 16% and 2% respectively.

XI. TERRORIST ACTIONS


Total terr orist actions

3230 2510


54

45

67

43

46

56

425947604746

45

49

5972 73

40

8884

49

50

90

2005 612 2006 646

0

Extorti

134 145155

130

58

124 127 124

Meta M. Bogot Cundinamarca Huila

Most affected zones

100

150

200

ons

50

2005=1.7392006=

Crime Report 2006


29/65


The 2006 data showed an increasing trend during the first three months reaching apeak of 88 cases in March. From March onwards the figures showed irregular ups anddowns, where August recorded the highest peak, 73 cases and September the lowestfigure, 25 cases.

inces, with 87 and 63 cases respectively, followed by Valle province with 46ases.

During 2006, the largest amount of terrorist actions occurred in Norte de Santander andMeta provcNorte de Santander was the most affected province by this scourge during 2006reporting an increment of 64% compared with the 2005 data, which means 34 morecases; in the same way Meta and Valle showed increases of 17% and 109%respectively.

Total terror ist act ions and rate per 10 0,000 inhabitants

646612724

1.257

1.645

1.172

1.549

2

34

34

11

900

1.800

2

4

6

0

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 20060

CasesRate per 100.000 inhabitants

Total terror ist act ions and rate per 10 0,000 inhabitants

646612724

1.257

1.645

1.172

1.549

11

2

34

34900

1.800

2

4

6

0

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 20060

CasesRate per 100.000 inhabitants

53

87

54

63

22

46

0

25

50

75

100

Cases

Nte. Santander Meta Valle

Most affected zones

20052006

Crime Report 2006COLOMBIAN NATIONAL POLICE


30/65


35

126

273

12

0

100

200

300

Oil Pipeline s Ene rgy T ow ers Vehicle s Bridge s

Destroyed infraestructure by terrori sm

2006

The most affected assets by terrorist actions were vehicles and energy towers, followedby oil pipelines and bridges, since the armed groups have recorded a historic trend toattack international and local petroleum companies. These terrorist actions causedreparable losses of human lives and a significant monetary cost for the economy of the

countr

iry.

Terroris t actions -offenders

1%

2%

6%

72%

19%

FARC

Common Delinquency

ELN

Self-Defenses

Unknown

Crime Report 2006COLOMBIAN NATIONAL POLICE DIJIN


31/65

pCOLOMBIANNATIONAL POLICE DIJIN

XII . SUBVERSIVE ACTIONS


. From August onwards, there was a downward trend reaching thewest number of subversive actions during November and December with 4 cases each

Total subversi ve actions

812

2222

22

212016

34

15

2831

4

6

410

30

119

18129

2826

0

20

40


2005= 268 2006= 167

This criminal activity reported a 38% decrease or 101 fewer cases, when comparing thetwo years object of this study. However, when evaluating the monthly variations during2006, the highest peaks were recorded in February, March and August, with 28, 26 and30 cases, respectivelylomonth.

357

439

218 195

118

0

100

200

300

400

500

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Total subversi ve actions



32/65

COLOMBIANNATIONAL POLICE DIJIN

In 2006, Nario province recorded the largest number of subversive actions, with 28cases, followed by Meta, Caquet and Cauca provinces with 25, 18 and 10 cases

decrease in the frequency of this offense

27 28

8

25

4

18

25

10

0

20

40

Nario Meta Caqueta Cauca

Most affected zones by subversiv e actions

2005

2006

respectively. Cauca province reported a 60%falling from 25 subversive actions to 10.

Subversi ve actions - Offenders

1%

99 %

FARC

ELN

The 2006 data showed that 99% of the subversive actions were committed by thearmed group FARC (the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) and 1% of the actionswere committed by the ELN (the National Liberation Army).



33/65

COLOMBIANNATIONAL POLICE DIJIN

COLOMBIAN NATIONAL POLICE OPERATIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS

2 00 5 2 00 6 A BSOLUTE PER CENTA GE

342.031 270.025 -72.006 -21%

CAPTURED 2.509 2.306 -203 -8%

KILLED IN ACTION 63 48 -15 -24%

SUBMITTED 224 202 -22 -10%

CAPTURED 1.903 747 -1.156 -61%

KILLED IN ACTION 26 7SELF-DEFENSE

-19 -73%

SUBMITTED 940 50 -890 -95%

143 111 -32 -22%

CARS 15.666 10.637 -5.029 -32%

VALUE IN MILLION PESOS 447.000 359.781 -87.219 -20%

MOTORCYCLES 13.603 10.215 -3.388 -25%

RECOVERED 627.013 526.858 -100.155 -16%

SEIZED 1.261.568 2.062.328 800.760 63%

74.581 70.047 -4.534 -6%

COCAINE 74.417 51.567 -22.850 -31%

MARIHUANA 92.423 89.040 -3.383 -4%

COCA BAS E 19.803 33.026 13.223 67%

HEROIN 722 424 -298 -41%

OPERATIVE ACHIEVEMENTS YEA R VARIA TION

ARRESTS (FOR ALL CRIMES)

GUERRILLA

MEMBERS

ILLICIT DRUGSEIZURES

(KILOGRAMS)

KIDNAPPED PEOPLE RESCUED

RECOVERED M OTOR-VEHICLES

MERCHANDISE(VA LUE IN MI LLION

PESOS)

FIREARMS SEIZED

VALUE IN MILLION PESOS 40.634 32.604 -8.030 -20%



34/65

DIJIN

I. ARRESTS CARRIED OUT FOR ALL TYPES OF CRIMES

ational volume, trends and rate

his operative activity showed a decrease of 21%, reaching a total of 270.025 peoplerrested in 2006, which represents 72.006fewerarrests than those that took place in005, with a daily average of 740.

he 2006 data showed an upward trend in the number of captures from January toctober when it reached a peak of 25.392 arrests and started falling to 21.481 capturesDecember.

N

2509 23061903

747

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

Subversives Self Defenses

Subversi ves and self defenses -arrests

2005 2006

Total arr ests carr ied out for all types of crimes

21,524,6

28,130,730,529,432,1

34,833,0

21,025,8

30,7

21,522,4

25,425,324,222,623,022,821,818,3 20,0

22,7

0

20

40


Thousands

2005= 342.031 2006= 270,025

Ta2TOin



35/65

II. RECOVERED AND SEIZED MERCHANDISE

field of seized merchandise show a positive trend

ith a significant increase of 63% when comparing the years 2005 and 2006. Regarding

RED MOTOR-VEHICLES

627.013 526.858

1.261.568

2.062.328

0

1.200.000

2.400.000

Recovered Seized

The operative achievements in the

Merchandise (mill ion Pesos)

2005

2006

wrecovered merchandise, there was a drop of 16% in the value of recovered goods.

I I I . RECOVE

957818

1.189

1.4501.3731.295

1.5011.5641.614

997

1.325

1.583

802700

852933932925978852904836

943 980

0

300

600

900

1200

1500

1800


Hundreds

2005= 15.666 2006= 10.637

The 2006 data showed a 32% decrease in this operative activity, which means 5.029fewer recovered vehicles than those recovered in 2005.



36/65

4.333

2.9322.404

1.585

2.251

1.424995 738 788 593

0

2.000

4.000

6.000

Chevrolet Mazda Renault Toyota Ford

Recover ed cars class ifi ed by manufacturer s

2005

2006

thand place, Mazda and Renault recorded a total of 1.585

followed by Toyota and Ford, with aarticipation of 7% and 6%, also 738 and 593 recovered cars, respectively.

Analyzing the statistics by car manufacturers, 28% of the recovered cars during the lasttwo years have been Chevrolet, with a total of 2.932 cars during 2006, 1.401 lessthose recovered in 2005; in seconand 1.424 recovered cars, respectively,p

Recovered cars classi fied by model

15%33%

4%

1950 to 1979

1980 to 1989

1990 to 1999

2000 to 2007

17%

11%

2Unkwnown



37/65

IV. ILLICIT DRUG SEIZURES

Colombianolice. This represents an increase of 67% in contrast with the 2005 data.

. EXPROPRIATION

19.803

30.026

0

20000

40000

K

ILOGRAMS

Coca base

Seized cocaine

2005

2006

Since drug trafficking is the most important source of funding for the guerrillas, the Antinarcotics Police has done a significant work in this field to tackle the organizedcrime based on this illegal activity.

During the year 2006, 30.026 kilograms of coca base were seized by theP

V

4.387 4.560

1.657

2.721

2.000

4.000

6.000

Expropriation

2005

2006



38/65

CHANGES IN THE CRIM INALI TY COMPOSITION

Criminality compositi on in the 90 s

47%

11%

42%

Property Crimes

Violent Crimes

Other Crimes

Criminality composition 200637%

19%11%

21%

7%5%

Property Crime

Violent Crime

Public Health (Drug Trade)

Public Security

Copyright's Owner

Others

OFFENSES 2004 % 2005 % 2006 %

Violent crime 69.209 23% 62.621 19% 81.359 21%

Property crime 116.173 38% 117.241 35% 142.549 37%Against The Public Security*(includes Firearms Traffic)

19.703 6% 19.874 6% 25.060 7%

Against Copyrights owner 10.498 3% 19.227 6% 18.633 5%Against The Public Health(Especially drug trade)

48.423 16% 61.269 18% 44.006 11%



39/65

n the other hand, the offenses against the Economic Patrimony continue having the

highest percentage of participation of the total number of crimes, 35% and 37% duringthe years 2005 and 2006, respectively. In contrast, offenses against the Public Healthpresented a reduction in participation going down form 18% to 11% in 2005 and 2006,respectively. Other crimes have had an increase in their percentage of participation,especially offenses against the Public Security with 7% of participation in 2006, as aconsequence of the higher incidence during the last 10 years, of drug and arms traffic,committed by self-defenses groups, subversives and other outlaw groups.

O



40/65

CONCLUSIONS

per 100.000

inhabitants, which had never been achieved before during the last 25 years,which equals to 17.479 cases. In 1981, the same rate of 2005 was recorded.However, the total number of cases reached 10.805 and the population at thattime was of 29080.0000 inhabitants. While the colombian population grew 58%,the homicides rate remained constant.

The favorable 3% reduction in the total homicides when comparing the 2006

data to 2005 equals to 632 less. However, this figure is more relevant whencomparing the 2006 data with 2002, corresponding to a 39% decrease or 11.358fewer homicides, falling from 28.837 in 2002, to 17.479 occurrences in 2006.

The amount of 28.837 homicides could be compared with the population ofmunicipalities such as Abejorral (Antioquia), San Jacinto (Bolvar), Paipa(Boyac), Salamina (Caldas) or La Calera (Cundinamarca), which would representthe extinction of those regions of the country.

Auto-thefts recorded a 7% decrease, falling from 9.961 cases in 2005 to 9.246reported in 2006, but we must point out the 47% reduction in this offense, whencomparing the 17.303 motor-vehicle thefts occurred in 2002 with the casesrecorded in 2006. This achievement has been possible as a consequence of theincrement in the number of municipalities protected by the National Policethroughout the country, as well as the preventive and control actions taken

against this crime.

During 2006, there were 42 fewer cases of highway banditry, which equals to a6% reduction when comparing it with the 2005 data. The importance of thisfigure is noticeable when comparing the 1.436 cases reported in 2002 (765 more

h h ) h k bl d l f d

SOCIAL IMPACT OFFENSES COMPAR ISON

This report shows an important success on violence reduction achieved byColombian National Police, as follows:

In 2006 Colombia reached the lowest homicide rate of 37 cases



41/65

These achievements have nks to the current DemocraticDefense and Security Police, and have created a favorable climate for foreign

investment in Colombia.

In regard to extortion, this crime also recorded a 5% reduction or 87 fewer casesw n

Although the terrorist actions recorded a 6% increase or 34 more cases than those

o

dataa 61

COLO

Illicit Drug Seizures: It is important to emphasize about the Police efforts oriented

theinc

There were a total of 270.025 arrests carried out by the Police for all crimes.

Sei

An e National Police, after having 168

unicipalities without police presence in 2002, the goal of covering the total area of

Thehecyeaequ

Colombian National Police (CNP) is also developing intensive operations in the field

64%treexp

been reached tha

he comparing to the 2005 data.

ccurred in 2005, the statistics become really significant when comparing the 2002

with 1.645 cases of terrorism, to the 2006 data, with 646 cases, corresponding to% decrease.

MBI AN NATIONAL POLICE OPERATIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS

towards the fight against drug trafficking, which have led to significant increments inamount of illicit drugs seized, when comparing the years 2005 and 2006,

rements as 67% for coca base.

zed merchandise reported a significant 63% rise.

increment in the national zones protected by th

mthe nation was reached.

reduction of 23% in illegal coca crops during 2006, which equals to 40.537tares. This an important accomplishment if we take into account the fact that sixrs ago, in 2000, there were 160.000 hectares used for illegal crops, amount thatals to the area of Bogot, D.C; this means, 1.600 square kilometers.

of expropriations. For instance, comparing the years 2005 and 2006, the increase ofin the number of seized goods is obviously a demonstration of its effort. This

nd is similar in the case of the goods under investigation by the judiciary whicherienced an increase of 4%



42/65

Avenida El Dorado No. 75 25 (Bogot - Colombia) / Tel. (57) (1) 426 6333ww w.policia.gov.co / [email protected] / [email protected]

1

TABLE 1. SOCIAL IMPACT OFFENCES COMPARI SON 2005 - 2006

2005

18.111

48

252

3.889

30.403

10.059

14.797

13.572

41.271

69.640

9.961

9.016

18.977

713

91

800

30

114

612

1.739

268

155.302

YEA

2 OL % W LY 00 2006

1 632 % 37 9%

11 3% 0 0%

59 3% 0 0%

4 168 % 9 2%

.09 % 99 24%

13.13 .075 % 28 7%

20.24 .448 % 43 10%

CO 16.25 .686 % 29 35 8%

PER 54.82 .55 % 90 117 28%

TO 91.332 .69 % 151 195 47%

AU 9.246 715 % 22 20 5%

MO 10.53 .515 % 20 23 5%

TO 19.777 00 % 41 42 10%

671 42 % 2 1 0%

92 1 % 0 0 0%

687 113 4% 2 1 0%

CAS 12 18 0% 0 0 0%

VIC 41 73 4% 0 0 0%

646 34 % 12 1 1 0%

1.652 87 % 32 4 4 1%

167 101 -38% 3 1 0 0%

TOTAL SOCIAL IMPACT OFFEN 196.19 .888 26% 3.773 337 419 100%

ER0N

PERCENTAGE OF

IPATION

THEFT

TERRORIST ACTIONS

OFR AT

MURDER

HIGHWAY BADITRY

BANK ROBBERY

EXTORTION

SUBVERSIVE ACTIONS

20 ER

HURTO DE VEHCULOS

KIDNAPPING

MASSIVE KIDNAPPING

MASSIVE MURDERS

TRAFFIC FATALITIES

PERSONAL INJURIES

TRAFFIC INJURIES

6 2005

12%

0%

0%

3%

20%

6%

10%

9%

27%

45 %

6%

6%

12 %

0%

0%

1%

0%

0%

0%

1%

0%

100%

TS PARTIC

2005 2

39

0

1

8

66

22

32

RATE P100.00

INHABITA

EEK

336

1

4

78

894

253

389

313

1.054

1.756

178

203

38 0

13

2

13

0

1

06 AV

DAILY HOUR

48 2

0 0

1 0

11 0

127 5

36 1

55 2

45 2

150 6

250 10

25 1

29 1

54 2

2 0

0 0

2 0

0 0

0 0

2 0

5 0

0 0

538 22

AGES

MONTHLY

1.457

3

16

338

3.875

1.095

1.687

1.355

4.569

7.611

771

878

1.648

56

8

57

1

3

54

138

14

16.349

-3

-2

-2

4

53

31

37

20

33

31

-7

17

4

-6

1

-1

-6

-6

6

-5

ION

UTE

3

8

2

VARI

006 ABS

7.479 -

37 -

193 -

.057

46.496 16

4 3

5 5

8 2

9 13

21

-

1 1

8

-

-

-

-

-

-

0 40

CASES

VICTIMS

BURGLARY

MMERCIAL

SONAL

TAL

TOMOBILES

TORCYCLES

TAL

ES

TIMS

CES

FENCE


43/65



44/65

TABLE 3. MASSIVE MURDERS

POLICE DEPARTMENT DATA

JANUARY

FE

BRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SE

PTEMBER

O

CTOBER

NOVENBER

DECEMBER

TO

TAL2006

TO

TAL2005

PERCENTAGE

VA

RIATION

20

06-2005

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 2 100%

VICTIMS 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 21 21 0%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 100%

VICTIMS 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100%VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 -100%

CASES 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 -50%

VICTIMS 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 12 -25%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 -100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 -100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 -100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 -100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 0 100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 -100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 -100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 -100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 -100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 100%

VICTIMS 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 100%

CASES 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 100%

VICTIMS 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 50%

CASES 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 4 1 300%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 6 4 0 18 4 350%

CASES 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 5 20%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 4 5 14 0 5 0 4 0 0 32 24 33%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 -100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 -100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 -100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 100%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 0 100%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

VICTIMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

CASES 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 -33%

VICTIMS 0 9 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 0%

CASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 100%

PUTUMAYO

QUINDO

RISARALDA

MAGDALENA

META

NARIO

NORTE DE SANTANDER

MAGDALENA MEDIO

SANTANDER

SUCRE

TOLIMA

HUILA

SAN ANDRS

ANTIOQUIA

ARAUCA

ATLNTICO

BOLVAR

BOYAC

CALDAS

CAQUET

CAUCA

AMAZONAS

CHOC

GUAINA

GUAVIARE

CASANARE

CESAR

CRDOBA

CUNDINAMARCA

GUAJIRA



45/65


1

TABLE 4. TRAFFIC INJUR IES

AMAZONAS 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 100% 2 0,05% 81.758ANTIOQUIA 10 14 5 14 13 7 9 11 9 10 8 8 11 8 71 66% 6 2,91% 1.931.837ARAUCA 2 2 0 2 4 2 1 3 3 0 3 3 25 14 79% 9 0,62% 292.540ATLNTICO 20 16 11 13 13 14 19 11 13 13 11 22 17 6 147 20% 7 4,34% 2.408.194BOL VAR 9 11 9 8 10 11 17 8 10 13 13 10 12 9 142 -9% 6 3,18% 2.116.932BOYAC 8 6 7 10 3 5 9 9 11 13 7 11 99 95 4% 7 2,44% 1.390.276

CALDAS 8 5 5 5 6 9 17 20 13 16 11 7 12 2 83 47% 10 3,01% 1.191.027CAQUET 4 1 0 6 1 4 3 8 5 6 5 2 45 16 181% 10 1,11% 472.423CAUCA 8 5 6 9 7 13 14 13 12 20 10 9 12 6 100 26% 10 3,11% 1.289.040CASANARE 3 3 3 6 7 1 2 0 2 2 6 4 39 33 18% 12 0,96% 330.528CESAR 7 7 2 10 2 5 7 8 11 10 15 11 95 124 -23% 9 2,34% 1.069.755C RDOBA 8 6 18 9 9 14 8 5 14 12 15 8 12 6 105 20% 9 3,11% 1.464.772CUNDINAMARCA 29 8 13 8 35 10 23 15 33 21 20 29 24 4 188 30% 10 6,01% 2.402.356CHOC 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 8 9 -11% 2 0,20% 386.705GUAJIRA 7 2 4 6 6 5 10 4 5 14 6 9 78 68 15% 15 1,92% 534.457GUAIN A 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 100% 5 0,05% 43.876GUAVIARE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 -50% 1 0,05% 208.832

MAGDALENA 8 14 6 9 7 2 9 4 4 2 2 5 72 83 -13% 5 1,77% 1.428.333MAGDALENA MEDIO 14 2 2 0 3 1 3 1 2 3 6 3 40 39 3% 8 0,99% 527.465META 12 11 12 13 3 5 9 6 7 10 9 11 10 8 119 -9% 14 2,66% 745.410NARIO 11 6 11 12 11 13 5 4 9 15 9 16 12 2 211 -42% 7 3,01% 1.804.020NORTE DE SANTANDER 8 7 12 14 17 15 20 21 17 11 13 18 17 3 136 27% 11 4,26% 1.517.817PUTUMAYO 1 2 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 5 0 1 15 35 -57% 4 0,37% 384.772QUIND O 7 7 4 9 19 5 6 6 7 14 8 9 10 1 63 60% 16 2,49% 622.395RISARALDA 10 5 5 10 3 10 4 7 7 8 10 7 86 138 -38% 8 2,12% 1.041.735SANTANDER 11 8 13 8 12 10 17 16 13 8 18 18 15 2 208 -27% 8 3,75% 1.847.582SAN ANDR S 1 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 13 17 -24% 15 0,32% 84.720

SUCRE 4 5 3 3 2 3 3 1 3 2 3 3 35 50 -30% 4 0,86% 883.962TOLIMA 9 12 9 12 8 8 12 7 14 3 20 5 11 9 137 -13% 9 2,93% 1.312.344HUILA 15 16 6 9 6 9 7 11 31 18 13 15 15 6 165 -5% 15 3,85% 1.012.356URAB 4 2 0 4 1 0 2 5 3 4 3 8 36 44 -18% 7 0,89% 517.686

VALLE 24 33 18 21 21 14 12 22 13 7 13 15 21 3 262 -19% 11 5,25% 2.013.860VICHADA 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 200% 3 0,07% 97.656METROPOLITAN BOGOT 22 35 29 30 44 35 47 51 40 53 34 53 47 3 494 -4% 6 11,66% 7.299.374METROPOLITAN CALI 37 26 40 29 22 31 37 32 40 43 34 25 39 6 373 6% 15 9,76% 2.697.267METROPOLITAN MEDELLN 28 16 18 28 17 13 33 17 33 40 28 37 30 8 114 170% 9 7,59% 3.318.225

TOTAL 351 296 273 320 317 278 370 329 385 399 353 386 4.057 3.889 4% 9 100,00% 46.772.286

POPULATION

2006

JANU

ARY

FEBRUARY

M

AR

CH

APR

IL

MA

Y

JUNE

JULY

AUG

UST

TOTAL

2006

POLICE DEPARTMENT

TOTAL

2005

PERCENTAGE

VARIA

TION

2006-

2005

RATE

PER

100.

000

INHABI

TANTS

2006

PARTICI

PATION

2006

SEPTE

M

BER

OCTO

BER

NOVENBER

DECEM

BER


46/65



47/65

TABLE 6. TRAFFIC INJUR IES

AMAZONAS 12 8 2 4 6 1 0 5 8 6 5 8 65 38 71% 80 0,49% 81.758ANTIOQUIA 17 15 15 10 4 1 6 2 1 2 7 7 87 50 74% 5 0,66% 1.931.837ARAUCA 12 18 28 20 15 1 34 10 15 7 3 7 170 36 372% 58 1,29% 292.540ATLNTICO 44 35 51 24 31 31 34 50 23 25 26 38 412 383 8% 17 3,14% 2.408.194BOLVAR 34 34 33 30 34 33 32 33 26 27 9 6 331 116 185% 16 2,52% 2.116.932BOYAC 58 33 46 65 42 51 56 34 36 26 50 46 543 271 100% 39 4,13% 1.390.276

CALDAS 144 94 96 156 56 49 45 64 52 37 29 53 875 483 81% 73 6,66% 1.191.027CAQUET 33 32 20 31 16 22 24 31 22 41 26 31 329 192 71% 70 2,50% 472.423CAUCA 14 6 9 24 7 24 12 12 13 51 22 34 228 206 11% 18 1,74% 1.289.040CASANARE 5 1 5 3 6 6 10 13 24 23 12 14 122 58 110% 37 0,93% 330.528CESAR 8 12 15 8 21 6 32 24 16 11 14 14 181 182 -1% 17 1,38% 1.069.755CRDOBA 74 11 45 45 29 36 31 46 50 41 44 9 461 134 244% 31 3,51% 1.464.772CUNDINAMARCA 41 25 27 14 49 12 32 30 40 30 29 56 385 312 23% 16 2,93% 2.402.356CHOC 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 16 12 33% 4 0,12% 386.705GUAJIRA 23 15 17 16 17 7 21 9 9 21 15 15 185 86 115% 35 1,41% 534.457GUAINA 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 5 20 10 100% 46 0,15% 43.876GUAVIARE 6 0 3 0 2 4 0 3 3 8 6 2 37 41 -10% 18 0,28% 208.832

MAGDALENA 12 2 8 10 7 1 15 8 4 4 14 17 102 92 11% 7 0,78% 1.428.333MAGDALENA MEDIO 23 17 16 6 11 8 13 11 13 29 42 16 205 60 242% 39 1,56% 527.465META 88 89 68 86 81 69 84 64 48 54 46 60 837 204 310% 112 6,37% 745.410NARIO 32 12 17 17 10 20 9 8 5 10 1 16 157 355 -56% 9 1,20% 1.804.020NORTE DE SANTANDER 6 10 5 8 7 11 9 10 13 13 11 13 116 116 0% 8 0,88% 1.517.817PUTUMAYO 2 6 1 3 0 4 1 0 1 6 0 1 25 40 -38% 6 0,19% 384.772QUINDO 4 5 4 14 14 6 8 22 19 32 17 44 189 66 186% 30 1,44% 622.395RISARALDA 48 27 22 24 7 6 9 8 42 28 29 32 282 210 34% 27 2,15% 1.041.735SANTANDER 89 62 76 71 64 70 94 102 97 71 74 84 954 495 93% 52 7,26% 1.847.582SAN ANDR S 22 8 0 1 9 1 4 6 6 18 11 7 93 190 -51% 110 0,71% 84.720

SUCRE 20 13 18 15 14 19 9 6 8 16 15 9 162 90 80% 18 1,23% 883.962TOLIMA 13 6 4 25 5 7 3 32 9 8 12 9 133 309 -57% 10 1,01% 1.312.344HUILA 82 33 18 20 20 55 65 71 36 45 31 44 520 515 1% 51 3,96% 1.012.356URAB 5 2 5 1 0 0 0 6 2 0 3 1 25 88 -72% 5 0,19% 517.686

VALLE 115 88 103 88 78 85 86 38 34 53 64 58 890 310 187% 44 6,78% 2.013.860VICHADA 0 1 0 2 5 1 2 0 4 0 0 3 18 2 800% 18 0,14% 97.656METROPOLITAN BOGOT 198 210 271 324 222 208 127 217 222 263 365 319 2.946 3.697 -20% 40 22,43% 7.299.374METROPOLITAN CALI 56 59 57 44 37 75 65 53 86 97 65 55 749 260 188% 28 5,70% 2.697.267METROPOLITAN MEDELLN 42 26 49 25 28 17 16 10 20 16 11 24 284 350 -19% 9 2,16% 3.318.225

TOTAL 1 .3 8 4 1.0 2 0 1.1 5 5 1 .2 3 5 9 5 4 9 4 7 9 8 8 1 .0 4 1 1.0 0 9 1.1 1 9 1.1 1 3 1.1 6 9 13.134 10.059 31% 28 100 ,00% 46.772.286

PO

PUL

ATIO

N

2006

JANU

ARY

FEBRUARY

M

AR

CH

APR

IL

MA

Y

JUN

E

JULY

AUG

UST

TO

TAL

2006

POLICE DEPARTMENT

TO

TAL

2005

PERCEN

TAGE

VARIA

TIO

N

2006-

2005

RATE

PER

100.

000

IN

H

ABI

TAN

TS

2006

PARTICI

PATIO

N

2006

SEPTE

M

BER

O

CTO

BER

N

O

VEN

BER

DECEM

BER


2



48/65

TABLE 7. BURGLARY

AMAZONAS 6 8 5 13 4 3 3 0 2 5 5 0 54 67 -19% 66 0,27% 81.758ANTIOQUIA 21 23 19 14 10 10 3 9 3 4 6 4 126 255 -51% 7 0,62% 1.931.837ARAUCA 21 17 7 5 6 4 7 3 6 2 6 2 86 19 353% 29 0,42% 292.540ATLNTICO 35 56 39 40 69 56 47 29 41 63 70 64 609 440 38% 25 3,01% 2.408.194BOLVAR 45 46 53 48 41 71 71 85 63 63 79 56 721 362 99% 34 3,56% 2.116.932BOYAC 73 78 38 38 48 66 56 79 73 55 70 70 744 277 169% 54 3,67% 1.390.276

CALDAS47

60 35 43 39 40 19 32 40 52 43 44 494 594 -17%41 2,44% 1.191.027

CAQUET 4 5 7 4 13 10 15 12 9 16 22 20 137 97 41% 29 0,68% 472.423CAUCA 21 8 17 23 10 24 26 22 30 21 32 31 265 227 17% 21 1,31% 1.289.040CASANARE 29 23 24 16 14 24 17 35 33 47 41 38 341 83 311% 103 1,68% 330.528CESAR 20 8 14 19 16 14 30 25 17 14 19 13 209 279 -25% 20 1,03% 1.069.755CRDOBA 27 21 26 27 20 8 13 19 32 15 17 23 248 204 22% 17 1,22% 1.464.772CUNDINAMARCA 137 148 115 103 185 150 123 182 280 217 186 98 1.924 622 209% 80 9,50% 2.402.356CHOC 9 10 3 8 4 0 7 1 5 5 0 0 52 66 -21% 13 0,26% 386.705GUAJIRA 20 17 14 22 12 24 29 15 18 27 23 20 241 47 413% 45 1,19% 534.457GUAINA 5 4 0 7 0 3 2 3 2 7 4 3 40 13 208% 91 0,20% 43.876GUAVIARE 2 0 2 2 3 2 2 1 5 5 3 2 29 21 38% 14 0,14% 208.832

MAGDALENA 11 6 23 14 15 22 26 22 28 37 31 19 254 75 239% 18 1,25% 1.428.333MAGDALENA MEDIO 21 22 25 38 24 22 17 20 26 21 22 14 272 227 20% 52 1,34% 527.465META 81 60 113 77 114 113 81 99 63 90 76 45 1.012 513 97% 136 5,00% 745.410NARIO 32 30 31 19 25 23 26 17 6 11 13 19 252 308 -18% 14 1,24% 1.804.020NORTE DE SANTANDER 36 19 15 15 6 4 10 14 5 9 12 23 168 236 -29% 11 0,83% 1.517.817PUTUMAYO 21 11 18 8 17 10 2 11 12 7 6 5 128 86 49% 33 0,63% 384.772QUINDO 34 28 30 26 37 24 41 35 41 43 38 30 407 307 33% 65 2,01% 622.395RISARALDA 79 72 80 61 59 73 65 62 72 64 81 73 841 615 37% 81 4,15% 1.041.735SANTANDER 75 51 43 49 60 49 53 81 90 75 54 30 710 651 9% 38 3,51% 1.847.582SAN ANDR S 16 15 9 13 12 8 8 15 13 15 8 11 143 167 -14% 169 0,71% 84.720

SUCRE 30 16 12 10 15 13 3 4 5 2 2 4 116 97 20% 13 0,57% 883.962TOLIMA 59 61 48 66 91 56 45 51 73 37 50 45 682 623 9% 52 3,37% 1.312.344HUILA 61 23 22 25 25 40 11 14 22 61 47 45 396 375 6% 39 1,96% 1.012.356URAB 20 12 1 2 5 2 2 3 8 3 3 5 66 82 -20% 13 0,33% 517.686

VALLE 83 81 73 105 99 76 91 69 51 58 56 38 880 472 86% 44 4,35% 2.013.860VICHADA 2 2 6 8 7 5 3 4 3 4 1 4 49 46 7% 50 0,24% 97.656METROPOLITAN BOGOT 381 297 345 407 380 355 387 374 403 365 380 500 4.574 5.325 -14% 63 22,59% 7.299.374METROPOLITAN CALI 113 208 227 248 223 279 295 232 217 214 179 141 2.576 305 745% 96 12,72% 2.697.267METROPOLITAN MEDELLN 54 36 22 40 35 34 24 58 17 16 39 24 399 614 -35% 12 1,97% 3.318.225

TOTAL 1 .7 3 1 1 .5 8 2 1 .5 6 1 1 .6 6 3 1 .7 4 3 1 .7 1 7 1 .6 6 0 1 .7 3 7 1 .8 1 4 1 .7 5 0 1 .7 2 4 1 .5 6 3 20.245 14.797 37% 43 100 ,00% 46.772.286

DECEM

BER

JANU

ARY

FEBRUARY

M

AR

CH

APR

IL

MA

Y

JUN

E

JU

LY

AUG

UST

POLICE DEPARTMENT

PARTICI

PATIO

N

20

06

PO

PUL

ATIO

N

20

06

TO

TAL

2005

PERCEN

TAGE

VARIA

TIO

N

2006-

2005

RATE

PER

100.

000

IN

HABI

TAN

TS

20

06

SEPTE

M

BER

O

CTO

BER

N

O

VE

NBER

TO

TAL

2006


3



49/65

TABLE 8. COMMERCIAL THEFT

AMAZONAS 2 3 0 6 2 1 3 5 4 3 6 1 36 28 29% 44 0,22% 81.758ANTIOQUIA 22 9 3 5 2 1 1 1 5 5 4 4 62 125 -50% 3 0,38% 1.931.837ARAUCA 7 13 6 6 7 9 3 6 2 3 1 3 66 15 340% 23 0,41% 292.540ATLNTICO 44 68 58 65 78 58 38 54 40 87 81 95 766 727 5% 32 4,71% 2.408.194BOLVAR 40 56 51 44 39 62 76 88 77 97 73 82 785 412 91% 37 4,83% 2.116.932BOYAC 58 58 34 37 40 45 45 66 84 58 56 66 647 211 207% 47 3,98% 1.390.276

CALDAS 16 7 9 7 7 11 5 9 13 20 1 6 4 124 136 -9% 10 0,76% 1.191.027CAQUET 2 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 5 18 17 6% 4 0,11% 472.423CAUCA 17 6 16 12 10 15 19 11 21 18 13 24 182 125 46% 14 1,12% 1.289.040CASANARE 7 5 5 13 5 10 12 14 19 25 18 16 149 22 577% 45 0,92% 330.528CESAR 18 11 15 19 17 18 22 16 31 25 18 20 230 214 7% 22 1,41% 1.069.755C RDOBA 9 19 9 21 11 3 7 9 9 13 8 4 122 106 15% 8 0,75% 1.464.772CUNDINAMARCA 88 92 71 53 66 75 47 92 117 109 104 57 971 613 58% 40 5,97% 2.402.356CHOC 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 8 4 100% 2 0,05% 386.705GUAJIRA 9 10 15 5 6 8 12 8 13 24 22 14 146 21 595% 27 0,90% 534.457GUAIN A 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 2 2 2 11 4 175% 25 0,07% 43.876GUAVIARE 3 3 1 3 4 5 3 3 6 6 2 3 42 12 250% 20 0,26% 208.832

MAGDALENA 20 10 14 22 10 20 18 21 21 17 17 15 205 112 83% 14 1,26% 1.428.333MAGDALENA MEDIO 18 25 14 16 20 15 12 19 28 23 21 18 229 175 31% 43 1,41% 527.465META 35 32 52 41 43 49 56 42 71 64 64 57 606 211 187% 81 3,73% 745.410N A R I O 26 10 29 20 13 18 25 22 1 6 7 6 183 175 5% 10 1,13% 1.804.020NORTE DE SANTANDER 30 26 29 14 15 14 16 18 7 11 14 10 204 234 -13% 13 1,25% 1.517.817PUTUMAYO 8 2 2 5 5 3 0 0 0 6 1 2 34 37 -8% 9 0,21% 384.772QUIND O 22 18 25 27 25 25 33 21 22 40 29 19 306 204 50% 49 1,88% 622.395RISARALDA 62 58 80 49 66 82 57 64 69 80 50 44 761 501 52% 73 4,68% 1.041.735SANTANDER 46 34 32 47 56 52 66 65 44 63 40 61 606 511 19% 33 3,73% 1.847.582SAN ANDRS 9 3 5 11 8 4 6 9 5 12 11 6 89 127 -30% 105 0,55% 84.720

SUCRE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 -33% 0 0,01% 883.962TOLIMA 24 25 62 42 39 26 33 48 48 45 47 43 482 538 -10% 37 2,96% 1.312.344HUILA 34 8 7 18 23 22 13 17 10 20 14 12 198 217 -9% 20 1,22% 1.012.356URAB 8 14 0 2 5 7 6 10 2 2 6 3 65 126 -48% 13 0,40% 517.686VALLE 38 43 48 42 67 72 51 47 60 31 46 28 573 436 31% 28 3,52% 2.013.860VICHADA 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 6 6 0% 6 0,04% 97.656METROPOLITAN BOGOT 433 358 459 395 518 453 408 431 440 423 372 416 5.106 5.767 -11% 70 31,41% 7.299.374METROPOLITAN CALI 93 92 131 137 132 111 106 110 183 168 129 124 1.516 568 167% 56 9,32% 2.697.267METROPOLITAN MEDELL N 149 97 86 95 84 52 23 37 31 15 33 20 722 832 -13% 22 4,44% 3.318.225

TOTAL 1 .3 9 8 1 .2 1 6 1 .3 7 4 1 .2 8 3 1 .4 2 6 1 .3 4 6 1 .2 2 4 1 .3 6 8 1 .4 8 8 1 .5 2 2 1 .3 2 7 1 .2 8 6 16.258 13.572 20 % 35 1 00 ,0 0% 46.772.286

D

ECEM

BER

PO

PUL

ATIO

N

20

06

TO

TAL

2006

RATE

PER

100.

000

IN

H

ABI

TAN

TS

20

06

PAR

TICI

PATIO

N

20

06

AUG

U

ST

SEPTE

M

BER

O

CTO

BER

N

O

VE

N

BER

POLICE DEPARTMENT

TO

TAL

2005

PERCEN

TAG

E

VARIA

TIO

N

2006-

2005

JANU

ARY

FEBRU

ARY

M

AR

CH

APR

IL

MA

Y

JU

N

E

JU

LY


4


50/65


51/65


TABLE 11. AUTO THEFT


52/65

TABLE 11. AUTO THEFT

POLICE DEPARTMENT

JAN

UARY

FEBR

UARY

MA

RCH

AP

RIL

M

AY

JU

NE

JU

LY

AUGUST

SEPTEM

BER

OCT

OBER

NOVENBER

DECE

M

BER

TOTA

L

2006

TOTA

L

2005

PERCE

NTAGE

VARIATI

ON2

006-

2005

THEFTR

ATE

PER

1.0

00

RE

GISTERED

VEH

ICLES

THEFTR

ATE

PER

100

.000

INHABITANTS

2006

PERCE

NTAGE

PARTIC

IPATION

2006

POPULAT

ION2

006

AMAZONAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0,00% 81.758

ANTIOQUIA 5 5 5 2 3 7 2 1 1 1 6 4 42 40 5% 0 2 0,45% 1.931.837

ARAUCA 4 1 0 1 5 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 16 25 -36% 9 5 0,17% 292.540

ATLNTICO 39 25 26 43 33 39 50 62 46 41 64 47 51 5 425 21% 4 21 5,57% 2.408.194

BOLVAR 8 5 9 7 7 10 7 9 2 7 8 5 84 66 27% 2 4 0,91% 2.116.932

BOYAC 3 7 5 4 6 3 8 13 6 1 8 3 67 68 -1% 2 5 0,72% 1.390.276

CALDAS 11 7 10 14 8 2 6 3 3 4 4 5 77 78 -1% 1 6 0,83% 1.191.027

CAQUET 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 11 8 38% 2 2 0,12% 472.423CAUCA 13 27 10 17 5 11 13 10 16 18 16 26 18 2 202 -10% 8 14 1,97% 1.289.040

CASANARE 0 5 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 13 15 -13% 6 4 0,14% 330.528

CESAR 2 5 2 8 1 5 6 4 3 8 3 7 54 51 6% 3 5 0,58% 1.069.755

CRDOBA 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 8 -63% 0 0 0,03% 1.464.772

CUNDINAMARCA 29 35 11 16 28 15 16 13 11 13 11 10 20 8 130 60% 1 9 2,25% 2.402.356

CHOC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0,00% 386.705

GUAJIRA 2 8 2 1 1 3 7 4 4 1 3 1 37 18 106% 20 7 0,40% 534.457

GUAINA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0,00% 43.876

GUAVIARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 -100% 0 0 0,00% 208.832

MAGDALENA 8 2 2 7 5 4 3 3 2 1 5 3 45 31 45% 2 3 0,49% 1.428.333MAGDALENA MEDIO 3 6 4 5 1 1 2 6 3 2 1 0 34 47 -28% 301 6 0,37% 527.465

META 9 12 11 16 7 13 6 10 13 13 5 8 12 3 95 29% 4 17 1,33% 745.410

NARIO 9 3 8 10 18 11 20 15 7 11 23 7 14 2 171 -17% 4 8 1,54% 1.804.020

NORTE DE SANTANDER 11 12 20 12 17 16 15 11 6 2 12 8 14 2 210 -32% 6 9 1,54% 1.517.817

PUTUMAYO 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 6 0% 3 2 0,06% 384.772

QUINDO 5 6 3 7 7 3 5 9 10 11 14 9 89 116 -23% 2 14 0,96% 622.395

RISARALDA 25 24 31 20 16 13 17 15 20 17 17 15 23 0 191 20% 4 22 2,49% 1.041.735

SANTANDER 13 17 11 11 13 9 13 14 11 16 18 20 16 6 136 22% 1 9 1,80% 1.847.582

SAN ANDRS 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 -50% 0 1 0,01% 84.720

SUCRE 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 12 6 100% 1 1 0,13% 883.962TOLIMA 5 1 5 10 3 2 4 8 11 10 5 2 66 121 -45% 1 5 0,71% 1.312.344

HUILA 7 4 3 3 2 6 7 2 4 6 3 3 50 81 -38% 2 5 0,54% 1.012.356

URAB 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 -75% 29 0 0,01% 517.686

VALLE 29 28 21 23 26 26 24 23 14 16 3 4 23 7 114 108% 3 12 2,56% 2.013.860

VICHADA 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0% 56 1 0,01% 97.656

METROPOLITAN BOGOT 311 288 312 319 323 350 327 295 303 293 269 235 3.625 4.640 -22% 5 50 39,21% 7.299.374

METROPOLITAN CALI 114 134 129 136 88 128 119 149 119 127 164 112 1.519 1.125 35% 7 56 16,43% 2.697.267

METROPOLITAN MEDELLN 110 123 110 121 138 142 126 131 134 127 114 72 1.448 1.727 -16% 8 44 15,66% 3.318.225TOTAL 782 794 755 817 762 823 806 817 751 748 781 610 9.246 9.961 -7% 4 20 100,00% 46.772.286


7


TABLE 12. MOTORCYCLE THEFT


53/65

POLICE DEPARTMENT

JAN

UARY

FEBR

UARY

MA

RCH

AP

RIL

M

AY

JU

NE

JU

LY

AUGUST

SEPT

EM

BER

OCT

OBER

NOVENBER

DECE

M

BER

TOTA

L

2006

TOTA

L

2005

PERCENTAGE

VARIATI

ON2

006-

2005

THEFTR

ATE

PER

1.0

00R

E

GISTERED

M

OTOR

CYCLES

RATE

PE

R1

00.0

00

INHABITANTS

2006

PERCENTAGE

PARTIC

IPATION

2006

POPULAT

ION2

006

AMAZONAS 1 3 0 3 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 15 17 -12% 4 18 0,14% 81.758

ANTIOQUIA 13 9 10 6 9 4 2 4 1 1 8 4 71 95 -25% 1 4 0,67% 1.931.837

ARAUCA 9 7 1 1 1 3 1 0 0 1 6 1 31 20 55% 2 11 0,29% 292.540

ATLNTICO 87 118 123 76 93 86 123 105 92 85 83 92 1.163 825 41% 27 48 11,04% 2.408.194

BOLVAR 49 55 45 42 50 55 47 47 33 49 65 47 584 406 44% 19 28 5,55% 2.116.932

BOYAC 8 3 2 6 3 1 7 6 5 5 8 10 64 64 0% 5 5 0,61% 1.390.276

CALDAS 9 11 14 11 11 7 8 8 12 5 11 7 114 176 -35% 3 10 1,08% 1.191.027

CAQUET 6 5 6 4 4 14 10 6 4 5 9 7 80 69 16% 4 17 0,76% 472.423CAUCA 21 24 17 15 17 13 23 9 24 15 16 26 220 187 18% 7 17 2,09% 1.289.040

CASANARE 9 3 11 5 5 5 3 5 4 10 4 0 64 52 23% 10 19 0,61% 330.528

CESAR 6 4 5 12 13 12 11 9 12 10 7 12 113 71 59% 6 11 1,07% 1.069.755

CRDOBA 8 7 8 11 5 2 6 1 6 6 5 9 74 49 51% 1 5 0,70% 1.464.772

CUNDINAMARCA 10 14 8 3 8 7 9 15 7 6 7 5 99 44 125% 1 4 0,94% 2.402.356

CHOC 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 7 3 0 2 0 23 33 -30% 33 6 0,22% 386.705

GUAJIRA 1 2 3 5 3 3 5 3 1 4 3 2 35 1 3400% 90 7 0,33% 534.457

GUAINA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 2 0% 143 5 0,02% 43.876

GUAVIARE 6 1 3 4 2 5 2 2 3 7 5 2 42 14 200% 5 20 0,40% 208.832

MAGDALENA 20 9 12 16 17 17 25 26 23 7 16 24 212 100 112% 16 15 2,01% 1.428.333MAGDALENA MEDIO 11 23 11 9 10 11 9 13 19 15 14 8 153 136 13% 55 29 1,45% 527.465

META 20 23 13 24 19 28 27 25 25 29 45 23 301 192 57% 9 40 2,86% 745.410

NARIO 20 21 25 20 22 16 33 17 8 13 11 7 213 337 -37% 11 12 2,02% 1.804.020

NORTE DE SANTANDER 9 12 13 13 15 8 14 16 13 18 12 18 161 255 -37% 7 11 1,53% 1.517.817

PUTUMAYO 9 2 4 3 3 1 1 0 7 5 4 8 47 35 34% 3 12 0,45% 384.772

QUINDO 5 12 9 7 4 4 2 6 8 15 18 11 101 80 26% 4 16 0,96% 622.395

RISARALDA 56 32 29 46 52 65 51 25 37 33 27 30 483 357 35% 10 46 4,59% 1.041.735

SANTANDER 23 20 15 22 24 28 35 27 32 27 30 26 309 277 12% 3 17 2,93% 1.847.582

SAN ANDRS 5 4 4 1 2 6 0 6 5 3 4 2 42 68 -38% 29 50 0,40% 84.720

SUCRE 11 2 6 8 3 6 2 1 2 5 4 6 56 94 -40% 3 6 0,53% 883.962TOLIMA 9 7 12 28 19 15 22 9 25 16 14 15 191 172 11% 4 15 1,81% 1.312.344

HUILA 29 33 24 35 23 33 40 24 30 36 34 24 365 451 -19% 10 36 3,47% 1.012.356

URAB 4 5 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 28 59 -53% 11 5 0,27% 517.686

VALLE 81 53 78 68 92 87 65 59 50 26 11 8 678 325 109% 4 34 6,44% 2.013.860

VICHADA 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 7 3 133% 1.750 7 0,07% 97.656

METROPOLITAN BOGOT 117 108 109 90 91 84 99 92 118 113 90 93 1.204 1.229 -2% 59 16 11,43% 7.299.374

METROPOLITAN CALI 102 154 109 138 115 141 151 157 124 142 140 133 1.606 1.013 59% 66 60 15,25% 2.697.267

METROPOLITAN MEDELLN 140 127 164 148 159 156 149 135 119 100 100 83 1.580 1.708 -7% 30 48 15,00% 3.318.225TOTAL 919 917 894 886 900 925 983 869 854 816 819 749 10.531 9.016 17% 9 23 100,00% 46.772.286


8


TABLE 13. TOTAL MOTOR VEHI CLE THEFTS


54/65

POLICE DEPARTMENT

JA

N

UA

R

Y

FEB

RU

A

R

Y

M

A

R

C

H

A

PR

IL

M

A

Y

JUN

E

JUL

Y

A

U

GU

ST

SEPTEM

B

ER

O

C

TO

B

ER

N

O

VEN

B

ER

D

EC

EM

B

ER

TO

TA

L2006

TO

TA

L2005

PER

CEN

TA

G

E

V

A

R

IA

TIO

N

2006-

200

5

TH

EFT

RA

TE

PER

1.

000

R

EG

ISTER

ED

M

O

TO

R

VE

H

IC

LES

TH

EFT

RA

TE

PER

100.0

00

IN

H

A

B

ITAN

TS

2006

PER

CEN

TA

G

E

PA

R

TICIP

A

TIO

N

200

6

PO

PU

LA

TIO

N

2006

AMAZONAS 1 3 0 3 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 15 17 -12% 4 18 0,08% 81.758ANTIOQUIA 18 14 15 8 12 11 4 5 2 2 14 8 11 3 135 -16% 0 6 0,57% 1.931.837ARAUCA 13 8 1 2 6 4 2 2 0 2 6 1 47 45 4% 3 16 0,24% 292.540ATLNTICO 126 143 149 119 126 125 173 167 138 126 147 139 1.678 1.250 34% 10 70 8,48% 2.408.194BOLVAR 57 60 54 49 57 65 54 56 35 56 73 52 66 8 472 42% 9 32 3,38% 2.116.932BOYAC 11 10 7 10 9 4 15 19 11 6 16 13 13 1 132 -1% 2 9 0,66% 1.390.276

CALDAS 20 18 24 25 19 9 14 11 15 9 15 12 19 1 254 -25% 2 16 0,97% 1.191.027CAQUET 8 6 8 5 4 15 11 7 4 5 11 7 91 77 18% 4 19 0,46% 472.423CAUCA 34 51 27 32 22 24 36 19 40 33 32 52 40 2 389 3% 7 31 2,03% 1.289.040CASANARE 9 8 13 5 5 5 4 7 4 11 5 1 77 67 15% 9 23 0,39% 330.528CESAR 8 9 7 20 14 17 17 13 15 18 10 19 16 7 122 37% 4 16 0,84% 1.069.755CRDOBA 8 7 8 12 5 2 6 1 6 6 6 10 77 57 35% 1 5 0,39% 1.464.772CUNDINAMARCA 39 49 19 19 36 22 25 28 18 19 18 15 30 7 174 76% 1 13 1,55% 2.402.356CHOC 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 7 3 0 2 0 23 33 -30% 21 6 0,12% 386.705GUAJIRA 3 10 5 6 4 6 12 7 5 5 6 3 72 19 279% 33 13 0,36% 534.457GUAINA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 2 0% 56 5 0,01% 43.876

GUAVIARE 6 1 3 4 2 5 2 2 3 7 5 2 42 17 147% 5 20 0,21% 208.832MAGDALENA 28 11 14 23 22 21 28 29 25 8 21 27 25 7 131 96% 7 18 1,30% 1.428.333MAGDALENA MEDIO 14 29 15 14 11 12 11 19 22 17 15 8 18 7 183 2% 65 35 0,95% 527.465META 29 35 24 40 26 41 33 35 38 42 50 31 42 4 287 48% 6 57 2,14% 745.410NARIO 29 24 33 30 40 27 53 32 15 24 34 14 35 5 508 -30% 7 20 1,80% 1.804.020NORTE DE SANTANDER 20 24 33 25 32 24 29 27 19 20 24 26 30 3 465 -35% 6 20 1,53% 1.517.817PUTUMAYO 10 4 4 3 3 3 1 1 7 5 4 8 53 41 29% 3 14 0,27% 384.772QUINDO 10 18 12 14 11 7 7 15 18 26 32 20 19 0 196 -3% 3 31 0,96% 622.395RISARALDA 81 56 60 66 68 78 68 40 57 50 44 45 71 3 548 30% 7 68 3,61% 1.041.735SANTANDER 36 37 26 33 37 37 48 41 43 43 48 46 47 5 413 15% 2 26 2,40% 1.847.582SAN ANDRS 6 4 4 1 2 6 0 6 5 3 4 2 43 70 -39% 9 51 0,22% 84.720

SUCRE 14 3 6 10 3 6 2 2 4 5 5 8 68 100 -32% 2 8 0,34% 883.962TOLIMA 14 8 17 38 22 17 26 17 36 26 19 17 25 7 293 -12% 2 20 1,30% 1.312.344HUILA 36 37 27 38 25 39 47 26 34 42 37 27 41 5 532 -22% 6 41 2,10% 1.012.356URAB 4 5 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 29 63 -54% 12 6 0,15% 517.686VALLE 110 81 99 91 118 113 89 82 64 42 14 12 91 5 439 108% 4 45 4,63% 2.013.860VICHADA 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 8 4 100% 364 8 0,04% 97.656METROPOLITAN BOGOT 428 396 421 409 414 434 426 387 421 406 359 328 4.829 5.869 -18% 7 66 24,42% 7.299.374METROPOLITAN CALI 216 288 238 274 203 269 270 306 243 269 304 245 3.125 2.138 46% 12 116 15,80% 2.697.267METROPOLITAN MEDELLN 250 250 274 269 297 298 275 266 253 227 214 155 3.028 3.435 -12% 13 91 15,31% 3.318.225

TOTAL 1 .7 01 1 .7 11 1 .6 49 1 .7 03 1 .6 62 1 .7 48 1 .7 89 1 .6 86 1 .6 05 1 .5 64 1 .6 00 1 .3 59 1 9.7 77 1 8.9 77 4% 5 42 100,00% 46.772.286


9


TABLE 14. HIGHWA Y BANDITRY


55/65

POLICE DEPARTMENT

JANUARY

FEBR

UARY

MA

RCH

AP

RIL

M

AY

JU

NE

JU

LY

AUG

UST

SEPTEM

BER

OCT

OBER

NOVE

NBER

DECE

M

BER

TOTA

L

2006

TOTA

L

2005

PERCE

NTAGE

VARI

ATION

2006

-2005

RATE

PER

100

.000

INHAB

ITANTS

20

06

PARTIC

IPATION

20

06

POPULATION

20

06

AMAZONAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 81.758ANTIOQUIA 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 9 4 125% 0 1,34% 1.931.837ARAUCA 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 8 3 167% 3 1,19% 292.540ATLNTICO 5 4 5 1 5 7 1 3 1 2 6 6 46 58 -21% 2 6,86% 2.408.194BOLVAR 0 1 4 3 0 0 2 1 1 2 3 1 18 10 80% 1 2,68% 2.116.932BOYAC 2 2 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 11 3 267% 1 1,64% 1.390.276CALDAS 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 6 8 -25% 1 0,89% 1.191.027

CAQUET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 472.423CAUCA 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 5 6 26 27 -4% 2 3,87% 1.289.040CASANARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 100% 0 0,15% 330.528CESAR 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 1 2 13 2 550% 1 1,94% 1.069.755CRDOBA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 100% 0 0,15% 1.464.772CUNDINAMARCA 8 13 4 7 8 8 3 1 1 4 2 0 59 44 34% 2 8,79% 2.402.356CHOC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 386.705GUAJIRA 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0% 0 0,30% 534.457GUAINA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 43.876GUAVIARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 208.831MAGDALENA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1 6 1 500% 0 0,89% 1.428.333MAGDALENA MEDIO 1 5 2 3 0 1 0 5 2 1 0 0 20 22 -9% 4 2,98% 527.465META 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 50% 0 0,45% 745.410NARIO 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 67% 0 0,75% 1.804.020NORTE DE SANTANDER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 -50% 0 0,15% 1.517.817PUTUMAYO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 -50% 0 0,15% 384.772QUINDO 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 5 -40% 0 0,45% 622.395RISARALDA 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 -40% 0 0,45% 1.041.735SANTANDER 4 6 2 3 6 2 4 4 6 7 4 7 55 39 41% 3 8,20% 1.847.582SAN ANDRS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 84.720SUCRE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 883.962

TOLIMA 1 0 2 3 2 1 3 2 4 5 2 1 26 50 -48% 2 3,87% 1.312.344HUILA 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 6 14 -57% 1 0,89% 1.012.356URAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 517.686VALLE 2 6 3 1 7 7 2 4 3 1 0 0 36 38 -5% 2 5,37% 2.013.860VICHADA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 97.656METROPOLITAN BOGOT 9 9 10 5 12 7 10 12 9 13 22 13 13 1 171 -23% 2 19,52% 7.299.374METROPOLITAN CALI 6 6 1 7 13 6 7 13 9 7 14 7 96 49 96% 4 14,31% 2.697.267METROPOLITAN MEDELLN 7 13 5 1 6 6 8 4 9 8 5 7 79 149 -47% 2 11,77% 3.318.225

TOTAL 52 73 48 39 63 54 49 56 47 62 72 56 6 71 713 -6% 1 100,00% 46.772.286IT IS NECESSARY TO CLARIFY THAT VAUPES PROVINCE'S POPULATION IS R EGISTERED BY GUAVIARE PROVIN CE'S JURISDICTION.


10


TABLE 15. BANK ROBBERY


56/65

POLICE DEPARTMENT

JA

NUARY

FEBRUARY

M

ARCH

A

PRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEP

TEMBER

OC

TOBER

NO

VENBER

DECEMBER

TOT

AL2006

TOT

AL2005

PERCENTAGE

VAR

IATION

2006-2005

RA

TEPER

100.0

00

INHA

BITANTS

2006

PART

ICIPATIO

N

2006

POP

ULATION

2006

AMAZONAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0,00% 81.758ANTIOQUIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 100% 0 3,26% 1.931.837ARAUCA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

crime report 2006

Documents