credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

20
Credible evaluation of trials What kind of data do we need? Peter Doshi, PhD Johns Hopkins University October 5, 2012 Institute of Medicine Washington, DC “Negative” trial “Positive” trial

Upload: others

Post on 08-Feb-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

Credible evaluation of trials What kind of data do we need?

Peter Doshi, PhD Johns Hopkins University

October 5, 2012 Institute of Medicine

Washington, DC

“Negative” trial

“Positive” trial

Page 2: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org
Page 3: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org
Page 4: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

Main text

Statistical Analysis Plan Study protocol, amendments

Sample Case Report Forms

Certificate of Analysis

IPD

CSR CRF

INTERNAL

Sample informed consent form

Page 5: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

THERE ARE MANY TYPES OF TRIAL “DATA” 1. Journal publication and/or conference abstract or poster 2. Clinical Study Report (CSR) 3. Study Protocol and amendments 4. Sample Case Report Form (CRF) 5. Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) 6. Certificate of analysis 7. Sample Informed Consent form 8. Manual of Operations 9. Electronic Individual Participant Data (IPD) 10. Filled out Case Report Forms (completed CRFs) 11. laboratory reports 12. medical records and diagnostic reports 13. Investigator’s Brochure (IB) 14. Sponsor documents that do not go to regulators 14a. Marketing Assessments 14b. Email correspondence 14c. Meeting minutes 15. Records of the Data Monitoring Committee (aka DSMB) e.g. adjudication committee 16. Regulatory documents 16a. Medical officer's reports 16b. Advisory committee memoranda 16c. Site inspection reports

Types of data 1. MEASUREMENTS 2. ANALYSES 3. NARRATIVES

What information is needed to credibly assess a trial?

Page 6: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

8545 pages 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000

Paper needed to print Clinical Study Report for oseltamivir trial WP16263

Page 7: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

423 pages

8122 pages

233 pages

190 pages

8122 pages

Page 8: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

Gold et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1098-1107

STUDY PROTOCOL

“Methods” section vs. Protocol NEJM paper: 1458 words (2 pages) Protocol: 121 pages

Page 9: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PLAN

Gold et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1098-1107

Reboxetine study 013 https://www.iqwig.de/download/Studienbericht_zu_Studie_013.pdf

Page 10: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

STUDY PROTOCOL

“As described on the FDA Web site, the published CLASS trial differs from the original protocol in primary outcomes, statistical analysis, trial duration, and conclusions. In particular, the unpublished data show that by week 65, celecoxib was associated with a similar number of ulcer complications as diclofenac and ibuprofen.”

Hrachovec JB, Mora M. JAMA. 2001;286(19):2398-2400.

Page 11: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

Gold et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1098-1107

STUDY PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS

Page 12: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Page 13: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANT DATA (USUALLY ELECTRONIC)

Verify/Reproduce • “Having access to the ‘raw’ data for each study

enables data checking, thorough exploration, and re-analysis of the data in a consistent way.

Extend • “IPD meta-analysis has particular benefits when

the published information does not permit a good quality review, or where particular types of analyses are required that are not feasible using summary data.”

Chapter 18 Key Points. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.

Wiley, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org

IPD

Page 14: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

Scher et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1187-1197 BLANK CASE REPORT FORMS

Page 15: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

Slides by Dr. Thomas Marciniak, Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products, FDA www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/EndocrinologicandMetabolicDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM218484.pdf

COMPLETED CASE REPORT FORMS (Avandia RECORD trial)

Page 16: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

http://dida.library.ucsf.edu/pdf/pca00a10 http://dida.library.ucsf.edu/pdf/qhb00a10

MARKETING ASSESSMENTS

“The results of the recommended exploratory trials in neuropathic pain, if positive, will be published … but there is no intention to fully develop this indication at this point.”

“Publication Strategy”

versus

“Indication Strategy”

Example adapted from Vedula et al. Implementation of a publication strategy in the context of reporting biases. A case study based on new documents from Neurontin® litigation. Trials. 2012 Aug 13;13(1):136.

Page 17: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE

Described in Krumholz SD, Egilman DS, Ross JS. Study of neurontin: titrate to effect, profile of safety (STEPS) trial: a narrative account of a gabapentin seeding trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 2011 Jun 27;171(12):1100–7.

Contract Research Organization to Study Sponsor

Study of Neurontin: Titrate to Effect, Profile of Safety (STEPS)

• Investigators are inexperienced with conducting trials

• Investigators do not have study coordinators

• Up-front training for completing CRFs was minimal …

Page 18: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

“A CSR includes the most pertinent information about a clinical trial in an easily analyzed format. Drug manufacturers already produce these reports to meet international and national regulatory requirements. Making CSRs publicly available would not be expensive, yet disclosure would promote research integrity, medical knowledge, and public health.”

Rodwin MA, Abramson JD. JAMA. 2012 Sep 5;308:871-2.

Page 19: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

EMA’s “sea-change in attitude”

EU agency lifts lid on drug data secrets Sun, Jul 15 2012 By Ben Hirschler http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE86E04I20120715

“In the last 18 months, the EMA has released around 1.5 million pages of clinical trial data - an increase of more than a hundred-fold compared to 2010 and 2009.”

Page 20: Credible evaluation of trials - nationalacademies.org

Illustrations by Molly McMahon Also thanks to Yuko Hara and Tom Jefferson