creating the a+ assignment: a project management approach
DESCRIPTION
This document helps you identify and schedule the tasks you require to produce an A+ assignment for an undergraduate university assignment. A project management framework is illustrated.Allocating your time In general, you need to allocate your time in three roughly equal parts which together form ten distinct phases of work: The start up, planning, first draft, and layout phases (4 phases) The investigation/research and figures-graphics phases (2 phases) The enhancement, proof reading, document integration and submission phases (4 phases) The document provides a detailed Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) (checklist) of the task required to place yourself in a strong position for achieving an A+ grade for an assignment.Some adaptations and extensions need to be made for more advanced work, such as a research report, or a postgraduate assignment. One should add an eleventh phase: learning from the feedback from the assignment assessor as a basis for future assignments!Developed from a conversation and between Lisa Emerson and Peter Mellalieu with students at Massey University, New Zealand, circa 2000.TRANSCRIPT
1
Creating the A+ assignment:
A project management approach
Peter MellalieuDevelopment draft A: 11 Oct 2001
This document helps you plan out the time you need to produce an A+ assignment for an undergraduateuniversity assignment, using a project management framework. Some adaptations and extensions need tobe made for more advanced work, such as a research report, or a postgraduate assignment.
Allocating your timeIn general, you need to allocate your time in three roughly equal parts which together form ten distinctphases of work:
The start up, planning first draft and layout phases (4 phases) The investigation, research, figures and graphics phases (2 phases) The enhancement, proof reading, document integration and submission phases (4 phases)
The maximum grade you might achieveThe diagram Maximum potential grade versus Percent Total work completed more precisely shows themaximum possible grade you might get if you just complete the first part, then the second part, and then allthree parts described above.
The grade applies to an undergraduate assignment and assumes a ‘quick and dirty’ cobble together andsubmission of the assignment given the work already completed – if you are lucky!
In detail: The project work breakdown structureThe Project Work Breakdown Structure (Figure 1) shows the various tasks that need to be completed ineach of the ten Phases of activity required to create an A+ (First Class) written assignment, such as an essayor report. The Work Tasks within each Phase are roughly sequenced from top to bottom according to alogical precedence in each Phase.
In general, the Phases must be commenced starting from the left, and moving across the figure. However,some Phases can be carried out at the same time - such as the First Draft Writing Phase, and the LayoutDesign Phase.
Note that an element of ‘Fast Tracking’ (to reduce the time between project start, and completion) isdemonstrated. For example, some phases (such as the Enhancement Phase and the Document IntegrationPhase) can be commenced without waiting for feedback from the peer reviews of the document draftsproduced in earlier phases. The peer feedback may be incorporated part way through the appropriate Phase,although in a more leisurely world, one would ideally have the peer feedback prior to starting work on anew Phase.
The Network logic diagram (Figure 2) is a graphic representation showing the sequence and dependenciesof the tasks. For those with access to project management software, a more detailed breakdown of the tasks
2
could be produced and adapted to the particular assignment to be undertaken. The thick line shows thecritical path. If you get behind in your work on any activity that is on the critical path, then there is adanger that your assignment will finish later than initially intended – unless you work overtime!
The Percent of Total Work in Each Work Phase (Figure 3) shows the percentage proportion of the totalproject time that we estimate should be allocated to each Phase. The basis for this estimate of time derivesfrom discussion with several undergraduate students at Massey University in 1999, and is based around atypical assignment requiring a work effort of 30 hours spread over s month. Note how you should limit thetime you spend researching and investigating to about one-third of the total work effort – and that timeincludes writing up the notes of your research and investigation! Secondly, note that the Enhancementphase takes the second largest chunk of time – it is this phase of work that helps you craft your report into arationally sequenced, logical, clear and consistent production. This is where you practice the art of writingand demonstrate the soundness of your thinking.
The Project Timeline shows in a graphical format an example of how you might allocate your time acrossthe main tasks in each phase over a month. This example assumes you have 30 hours to spend on theassignment – about 7 hours per week.
Technical termsIn the Project Work Breakdown Structure there are some technical terms that writers use that you willneed to understand and learn how to apply. For example: topic sentences (look under ‘paragraphing’),transitions, introductory proposition, citation, reference, and peer review. Look in the index and contents ofa book such as Emerson (2000) or De Luca & Annals (2000). There are some project management termsthat you should also learn about: milestone, critical path, and fast tracking. See a reference on projectmanagement such as Duncan (1996), or Quinn et al (1996, Chapter 5)
AcknowledgementsThis diagram was inspired by a mini-lecture presented by Lisa Emerson, Director - Student LearningCentre, Massey University, to students of Enterprise Development at Massey University, and a tutorial byPeter Mellalieu to the same class on the topic of Project Management.
Further readingFor further reading on the topics of assignment writing and project management, see:
De Luca, Rosemary & Annals, Alison, (2000) Writing that works: A guide for students, Auckland: PearsonEducation ISBN 0-582-71897-X
Emerson, Lisa (2000) Writing Guidelines for Business Students (2nd Ed), Palmerston North: Dunmore Press
William R. Duncan (1996), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Upper Darby (PA-USA): Project Management Institute (PMI).
Quinn, R.E., Faerman S.R., Thompson, M.P., McGrath, M.R. (1996) Becoming a master manager: acompetency framework 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley. ISBN 0-471-00744-7
© Based on material by Peter Mellalieu and Lisa Emerson, 1999. All Rights Reserved. This diagram maybe used by others for non-commercial purposes provided it is represented in its entirety, including thismessage.
3
10095908580757065605550454035302520151050Percent of Total Work
Grade
NIL
E
D
C
C+
B-
B
B+
A-
A
A+
Maximum Potential Grade versus Percent Total Work Completed
Startup, Planning,First Draft and Layout
Phases
Research, and Figures & Graphics
Phases
Enhancement, Proof Reading,Document Integration, and
Submission Phases
4
Figure 1: Project Work Breakdown Structure
for Creating an A+ Essay or Report Assignment
© Peter Mellalieu 1999 Document Version: 1 Jan 1904
EnhancementPhase
Phase Work 15% Total Work 80% Maximum Grade
B+
First DraftWriting Phase
Phase Work 10% Total Work 20% Maximum Grade
D
Submissionand Closing
Phase
Phase Work 5% Total Work 100% Maximum Grade
A+
Startup Phase
Phase Work 5% Total Work 5% Maximum Grade
NIL
Identify Assignment Specification
Identify or specify target audience (reader)
Identify co-requisite reading
Identify other special requirements (group project?, multi-media aids?)
MILESTONE:: Requirements and Targets estab l i shed
Refine paragraphing (Topic sentences, single ideas per paragraph, transitions to new lines of thought)
Check for random (unconnected) sentences
Check first draft against Assignment Specification
Complete Reference and Biography sections
Printout Final version
Binding
Attach assignment cover sheet
Dispatch to assessor
Identify length and format
Identify Percent Assessment Contribution
Identify Due Date
Identify assessment criteria
Identify Recommended Total Work Load Hours
ResearchPhase
Phase Work 30% Total Work 55% Maximum Grade
B-
Refine logic and structure
Refine topic sentences
Complete supplementary reading, research, and/or interviews
Revise Project Management Plan
Check revised draft against Assignment Specification
Revise Project Management Plan
Write draft introduction and overview
Write draft summary and conclusion
Brainstorm ideas for report content and structure
Complete co-requisite reading
'Crash' write first draft
Circulate first draft to peer group for critical review
Backup computer files
Final Proof-Reading Phase
Phase Work 5% Total Work 85% Maximum Grade
A-
Check logic and argument
Check sequence
Check introductory proposition and overview
Check conclusion, summary and ‘wrap up’ statement
Check paragraphing (single ideas, topic sentences, paragraph length, transitions)
Check citations, references and bibliography
Check words (straightforward terms, formal terms, definitions)
Revise Project Management Plan
Celebrate completion
Check grammar
Revise Project Management Plan
Circulate research draft to peer group for critical review
Draft key topic sentences
Incorporate feedback on penultimate draft from peer review group
MILESTONE: Penultimate text p repa red
MILESTONE: A+ Assignment delivered to assessor by due d a t e
MILESTONE: Final text circulated
DocumentIntegration
Phase
Phase Work 10% Total Work 95% Maximum Grade
A
Apply style guide/template to final text
Layout figures, graphics, appendices, break outs, etc into final document
Prepare title page, contents list, list of figures, index, glossary, acknowledgements, appendixes, headers and footers
Check layout for consistency
Update Project Management Template (for future projects)
MILESTONE: Final document c i r cu la ted
MILESTONE: Research-based text circulated
Backup computer filesBackup computer files
MILESTONE: First Draft circulated
Spell check
Circulate penultimate draft to peer group for critical review
Determine assessment grade target
ProjectPlanning
Phase
Phase Work 5% Total Work 10% Maximum Grade
E
Allocate work load hours to phases and tasks
Identify critical path
Identify milestones
Develop Gantt Work Allocation Schedule
Communicate plan to key stakeholders and peer review team
MILESTONE: Project Plan c i r cu la ted
Incorporate feedback from peer review group
Final visual and spell check
Circulate final document to peer group for critical review
Identify and/or select assignment topic
Define and understand key concepts and terms
Estimate work hours available for committing to this assignment
Identify key risks, uncertainties, deadline clashes, priorities, and contingency options
Schedule special resources, interviews, group meetings
Type up draft
Create draft outline and structure
Identify additional literature and research resources
Spell check
Initiate requests and searches for required documents and/or confirm interviews
Spell check
Incorporate feedback from peer review group
Introduce quotations, citations, and other supporting evidence and arguments
Layout Design Phase
Phase Work 5% Total Work 25% Maximum Grade
C
Design layout style (page design, titles, headings, sub- headings, fonts, margins, paragraphing, binding)
MILESTONE: Layout design and template comp lete
Figures andGraphics
Phase
Phase Work 10% Total Work 65% Maximum Grade
B
Prepare figures, diagrams, pictures and other graphics
Prepare labelling for figures etc
Prepare introductions and explanations to figures
Spell check
Check layout design against Assignment Specifications
Circulate figures to peer group for critical review
MILESTONE: Figures, graphics c i r cu la ted
Identify opportunities for using illustrations, figures, graphics, ‘break out’ sections, appendices etc
Set up design template and style guide on computer
Explain figures, graphics, tables, appendices, etc, and integrate into argument
Incorporate feedback from peer review group
Check figures, graphics, tables, etc explained
Check spelling
Check page numbers
Check layout design against Assignment Specifications
Resolve ‘widows and orphans’
Incorporate feedback on layout design and figures from peer review group
Incorporate feedback on final text from peer review group
Check spelling
Reflect and document key lessons learned, personal insights, and recommendations for carrying out future projects
Make backup hardcopy and computer backups
Backup computer files
Backup computer files
Backup computer files
Backup computer files
Receive feedback from assessor.
Revise lessons learned, and recommendations for future projects
MILESTONE: Celebrate success
Develop investigation and/or research methodology
This Project Work Breakdown Structure shows the various tasks that need to be completed in each of the ten major Phases of activity required to create an A+ (First Class) written assignment, such as an essay or report. The Work Tasks within each Phase are roughly sequenced from top to bottom according to a logical precedence in each Phase.
In general, the Phases must be commenced starting from the left, and moving across the figure. However, some Phases can be carried out at the same time - such as the First Draft Writing Phase, and the Layout Design Phase.
Note that an element of ‘Fast Tracking’ (to reduce the time between project start, and completion) is demonstrated. For example, some phases (such as the Enhancement Phase and the Document Integration Phase) can be commenced without waiting for feedback from the peer reviews of the document drafts produced in earlier phases. The peer feedback may be incorporated part way through the appropriate Phase, although in a more leisurely world, one would ideally have the peer feedback prior to starting work on a new Phase.
The data for Phase Work shows the percentage proportion of the total project time that we estimate should be allocated to each Phase. The Total Work percentage shows the cumulative project work time including the current and all previous Phases. The Maximum Grade shows the maximum possible university grade which might reasonably be Maximum if the product of that Phase was quickly cobbled into a submitted assignment.
This diagram was inspired by a mini-lecture presented by Lisa Emerson, Director - Student Learning Centre, Massey University, to students of Enterprise Development at Massey University, and a tutorial by Peter Mellalieu to the same class on the topic of Project Management.
For further reading on the topics of assignment writing and project management, see:
Lisa Emerson (1995) Writing Guidelines for Business Students, Palmerston North: Dunmore Press William R. Duncan (1996), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge,, Upper Darby (PA-USA): Project Management Institute (PMI).
© Peter Mellalieu and Lisa Emerson, 1999. All Rights Reserved. This diagram may be used by others for non-commercial purposes provided it is represented in its entirety, including this message. This version: 1 Jan 1904
5
StartupPhase 5 %
ProjectPlanning
5 %
First DraftWriting 10 %
LayoutDesign 5 %
Research 30 %
Enhancement 15 %
ProofReading
5 %
Figures &Graphics
10 %
DocumentIntegration
10 %
Submissionand Closing
5% %
Figure 2: Network Logic Diagram for Creating and A+ Essay or Report Assignment
This diagram shows the logical dependencies which exist for this project. For example, the Enhancement Phase depends on outputs from both the Research and Figures & Graphics Phases. Work flows from left to right across the diagram. Figures show percentage of total expected work load for the complete project. Thick line indicates Critical Path © Peter Mellalieu, 1 Jan 1904
6
Figure 3: Percent of Total Work in Each Work Phase
Startup 5%
Planning 5%
First Draft 10%
Layout 5%
Research 30%
Figures 10%
Enhancement 15%
ProofReading 5%
Integration 10%
Submission 5%
StartupPlanning
First Draft
Layout
ResearchFigures
First Draft
Proof Reading
Enhancement
Submission
Integration
7
Task Name % of Total
Project Work
Planned Start Duration in Hours
Planned Finish Actual Start
Actual Finish
% Done
STARTUP, PLANNING, FIRST DRAFT 1/07/2000 0 1/07/2000
Startup 5 1/07/2000 1.5 2/07/2000 5
Requirements & Targets established 2/07/2000 0 2/07/2000
Project Planning 5 2/07/2000 1.5 4/07/2000 10
Project Plan Circulated 4/07/2000 0 4/07/2000
First Draft Writing 10 4/07/2000 3 7/07/2000 20
First Draft Circulated 7/07/2000 0 7/07/2000
RESEARCH, FIGURES, GRAPHICS
Research 30 7/07/2000 9 16/07/2000 50
Research-based text circulated 16/07/2000 0 16/07/2000
Layout and Design 5 16/07/2000 1.5 17/07/2000 55
Design Template completed 17/07/2000 0 17/07/2000
Figures and Graphics 10 17/07/2000 3 20/07/2000 65
Figures and Graphics circulated 20/07/2000 0 20/07/2000
ENHANCEMENT, INTEGRATION, SUBMISSION & CLOSURE
Enhancement 15 20/07/2000 4.5 25/07/2000 80
Penultimate text circulated 25/07/2000 0 25/07/2000
Final Proof Reading 5 25/07/2000 1.5 26/07/2000 85
Final Text and Figures circulated 26/07/2000 0 26/07/2000
Document Integration 10 26/07/2000 3 29/07/2000 95
Final Document circulated 29/07/2000 0 29/07/2000
Submission 2.5 29/07/2000 0.75 30/07/2000 97.5
Assignment delivered 30/07/2000 0 30/07/2000
Closure 2.5 30/07/2000 0.75 31/07/2000 100
Project Closed 31/07/2000 0 31/07/2000
31302928272625242322212019181716151413121110987654321Jul 2000
30
Project Time Line for Creating an A+ Written Assignment (Relaxed Version)
This chart shows the scheduling of actual hours spent on a Writing project. Assumptions: 30 hours available for the assignment, a work load capacity of 7 hours/per week, and no ‘fast tracking’.