craig j. nichols, secretary the state of e-rate today 1
TRANSCRIPT
2
Increasing Pressure on the Fund
Annual Funding Available:$2.25B Cap + Inflation (+ Approved Rollover Funds)
FY 2013 Funding:$2.25B + $130M = $2.38B (+ $450M) = $2.83B
FY 2013 Demand: $4.986B• $2.7B for P1 - First year rollover funds needed for P1• $2.286B for P2 - If all P1 requests funded, only $130M left for P2
3
Funding Years 2010-2012
$13,342,595.98 $9,979,152.32
$193,769,652.57
Status of Priority 1 Funding Requests
Amount Denied
Amount Pending
Amount Funded
4
Funding Years 2010-2012
$225,737,581.52
$16,946,041.00
$84,425,290.36
Status of Priority 2 Funding Requests
Amount Denied
Amount Pending
Amount Funded
5
Funding Years 2010-2012
5.58%
94.42%
Amount Denied
Telecommunications & In-ternet AccessInternal Connections & Connections Maintenence
6
Increasing Capacity Pressure on Schools
Standardized Online Testing (e.g., Common Core/PAARC)
Digital Curriculum/eBooks
BYOD/BYOT
Increasing use of Apps/Video Streaming/Cloud
Flipped Classroom– Individualized, Interactive, Collaborative
Distance Learning/Virtual Schools
7
Increasing Capacity Pressure on Schools
2010 FCC Schools and Libraries Survey:– 50% reported slower connection speeds than
average home– 39% report cost as greatest barrier to full
broadband capacity
2012 American Library Association Survey:– 25% of libraries have broadband speeds of
1.5Mbps or less– 9% have speeds of 100 Mbps or more
9
National Broadband Plan
March 2010 FCC releases 376 page order that set
broadband goals for education, government, consumers, homeland security, health care, and energy
Twelve E-Rate recommendations, most of which are contained in recently released E-Rate 2.0 NPRM
10
SETDA
May 2012SETDA Report: “The Broadband
Imperative: Recommendations to Address K-12 Education Infrastructure Needs”
Capacity Goals:• 2014-2015
– ISP Circuit: At least 100 Mbps per 1000 students – WAN: At least 1 Gbps per 1000 students
• 2017-2018– ISP Circuit: At least 1 Gbps per 1000 students – WAN: At least 10 Gbps per 1000 students
11
E-Rate 2.0April 11, 2013FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel:
“Reboot, reinvigorate, and recharge E-Rate.” 2011 FCC Study: 80% of schools & libraries do not
believe their broadband needs are being metFour steps to reform E-Rate:
• Increase E-Rate funding to handle increased demand• By FY2015, every school should have access to 100Mbps
per 1000 students; by FY2020, 1 Gbps per school • Encourage & institute new & creative public-private
partnerships• Simplify E-Rate application process
12
ConnectEDJune 6, 2013
Obama Administration unveils ConnectED Initiative Upgraded Connectivity – Within 5 years:
• 99% of students connected at speeds no less than 100Mbps with target of 1 Gbps
• High speed wireless within schools and libraries• Increase E-Rate $$$
Trained Teachers• Digital education tools• Use existing ESEA $$$
Build on Private Sector Innovation • Educational Devices• Global learning opportunities• Educational software
13
Obama Administration
June 14, 2013
Presidential Memorandum: “Expanding America’s Leadership in Wireless Innovation”
NIST & NTIA Announcement: Will establish new Center for Advanced Communications in Boulder, CO
14
LEAD Commission
Leading Education by Advancing Digital (LEAD) Commission • June 13, 2013: Five-Point Blueprint
– Solve infrastructure challenge by updating wiring of schools
– Build a national effort to deploy devices– Accelerate adoption of digital curriculum– Embrace & encourage model schools– Invest in human capital
• June 18, 2013: Supports FCC Chairman nominee Wheeler’s call to bolster E-rate, digital learning
15
U.S. Senate Commerce Committee
July 17, 2013
E-rate 2.0 Hearing• Witnesses representing:
– Calcasieu Parish School System– Maine State Library– LEAD Commission– Cisco
16
FCC E-Rate 2.0 NPRM
FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) Released July 23, 2013
• 175 pages• 616 questions and 357 ideas on which comments are
requested• Document divided into six categories:
1. Introduction2. Goals and Measures3. Ensuring schools and libraries have affordable access to 21st
Century broadband that supports digital learning4. Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of E-Rate funds5. Streamlining administration of the program6. Other outstanding issues
17
E-Rate 2.0 NPRM
Three Goals for Modernizing E-Rate Program:I. Increased Broadband Capacity
• Simplify rules on fiber deployment to lower barriers to new construction
• Prioritize funding for new fiber deployments that will drive higher speeds and long-term efficiency
• Phase out support for services like paging and DA• Ensure that schools and libraries can access funding for
modern high-speed WI-FI networks in classrooms and library buildings
• Allocate funding on a simplified, per-student basis
18
E-Rate 2.0 NPRM
Three Goals for Modernizing E-Rate Program:II. Cost-Effective Purchasing
• Increase consortium purchasing to drive down prices • Create other bulk buying opportunities• Increase transparency on how E-Rate dollars are
spent• Improve competitive bidding process• Create pilot program to incentivize and test more
cost-effective purchasing practices
19
E-Rate 2.0 NPRM
Three Goals for Modernizing E-Rate Program:III. Streamlined Program Administration
• Speed review of E-Rate applications• Provide streamlined electronic filing system & require
electronic filing of all documents• Increase transparency of USAC’s processes• Simplify Eligible Services List & adopt more efficient
ways to disburse E-Rate funds• Streamline E-Rate appeals process
20
E-Rate 2.0 NPRM
Other Broad Issues Addressed by NPRM:• Applicability of CIPA to devices brought into schools
and libraries, & to devices provided by schools and libraries for at-home use
• Adjusting to changes to NSLP that affect E-Rate• Additional measures for protecting program from
waste, fraud, and abuse• Wireless community hotspots
Comment Dates:• Initial Comments due September 16, 2013• Reply Comments due October 16, 2013
21
NPRM Detail
Go to FAEDS presentation