cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

32
Cpf1-based genome editing using the Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 System Rolf Turk, PhD 1

Upload: integrated-dna-technologies

Post on 10-Apr-2017

705 views

Category:

Science


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

1

Cpf1-based genome editing using the Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 System

Rolf Turk, PhD

Page 2: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

2

Outline: Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 System

• Background• Optimization of Cpf1 crRNA

• Length optimization• Chemical modification

• Delivery of Cpf1 as ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex• Effect of Alt-R Cpf1 Electroporation Enhancer• RNP concentration optimization

• Homology-directed repair using Cpf1• Positive controls

Page 3: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

3

Page 4: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

4

Cas9 genome editing

• RNA-guided endonuclease• PAM site (NGG)• crRNA and tracrRNA• Blunt-ended cut sites

Page 5: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

5

Cpf1 genome editing

• RNA-guided endonuclease• Cpf1: CRISPR from Prevotella and Francisella 1• Class II, type V• Cpf1 editing in mammalian cells

• Acidaminococcus sp. BV3L6• Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006

• Single guide RNA (crRNA, 41–44 nt)• Double-stranded break with staggered ends• PAM site is thymidine-rich

• Preferentially uses TTTV

Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, et al. (2015) Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided Endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell, 163:759–771.

Page 6: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

6

Cpf1 structure and function

6

Yamano T, Nishimasu H, et al. (2016) Crystal structure of cpf1 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell, 165(4):949–962.

Page 7: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

7

Comparison of Cas9 and Cpf1

Page 8: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

8

Low off-target editing with Cpf1

Kim D, Kim J, et al. (2016) Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nat Biotech, 34(8):863–868.

Page 9: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

9

Lower off-target effects with Cpf1 RNP vs. plasmid

Kim D, Kim J, et al. (2016) Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nat Biotech, 34(8):863–868.

Page 10: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

10

Alt-R™ A.s. Cpf1 Nuclease 2NLS on-target efficiency

46550 46650 46750 46850 46950 47050 47150 472500

102030405060708090

100

STAT3: exons 5 and 6HEK 293—RNP—Amaxa® Nucleofector® System

AsCpf1 SpCas9

Chromosome location

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

effici

ency

(%)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000

102030405060708090

100

STAT3: exons 5 and 6HEK 293—RNP—Amaxa® Nucleofector® System

AsCpf1 SpCas9

Ranked editing efficiency

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

effici

ency

(%)

93%

35%15%

Page 11: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

11

A.s. Cpf1 editing efficiency is PAM-sequence dependent

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800102030405060708090

100

HEK 293—RNP—Amaxa® Nucleofector® System232 crRNAs across 6 genes

TTTATTTCTTTGTTTT

T7E

I tot

al e

ditin

g ef

ficie

ncy

(%)

Ranked editing efficiency

Page 12: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

Alt-R™ A.s. Cpf1 Nuclease 2NLS on-target efficiency

0 20 40 60 80 1000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

STAT3: exons 5 and 6HEK 293—RNP—Amaxa® Nucleofector® System

AsCpf1 (TTTN) AsCpf1 (TTTV) SpCas9 (NGG)

Ranked editing efficiency

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

efficie

ncy

(%)

93%

35%

15%

53%

12

Page 13: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

13

Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 RNP complex

Page 14: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

14

Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 crRNA—protospacer length optimization

38171-AS 38254-AS 38325-S 38337-AS 38351-S 38538-S0

102030405060708090

100

HEK 293–Cpf1 Stable Cell Line—30 nM crRNARNAiMAX™ (Thermo Fisher)

24 mer23 mer22 mer21 mer20 mer

HPRT1 crRNA location and guide strand

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

effici

ency

(%)

Page 15: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

15

Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 crRNA—2′O-methyl testing

Locations affected by 2′OMe modification

T7EI total editing (%) T7EI total editing (%)

Page 16: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

16

Page 17: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

17

Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 RNP complex formation

Page 18: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

18

Effect of Alt-R™ Cpf1 Electroporation Enhancer with RNP

38094-S

38104-S

38115-AS

38146-AS

38164-AS

38164-S

38186-S

38228-S

38330-AS

38343-S

38455-S

38486-S0

102030405060708090

100

HEK 293—5 µM RNP—Amaxa® Nucleofector® System

0 µM Enhancer3 µM Enhancer5 µM Enhancer

HPRT1 crRNA location and guide strand

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

effici

ency

(%)

Page 19: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

19

Optimal Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 RNP concentration using Nucleofector®

19

*

* = Toxicity

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

HEK 293—RNP—Amaxa® Nucleofector® System HPRT1 38228-S

No EnhancerEquimolar Enhancer3 µM Enhancer

Cpf1 ribonucleoprotein complex concentration (µM)

T7E

I tot

al e

ditin

g ef

ficie

ncy

(%)

Page 20: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

20

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

HEK 293—RNP—Amaxa® Nucleofector® SystemHPRT1 38330-AS

No EnhancerEquimolar Enhancer3 µM Enhancer

Cpf1 ribonucleoprotein complex concentration (µM)

T7E

I tot

al e

ditin

g ef

ficie

ncy

(%)

** = Toxicity

Optimal Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 RNP concentration using Nucleofector®

Page 21: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

21

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

HEK 293—RNP—Neon® Transfection SystemHPRT1 38330-AS

No EnhancerEquimolar Enhancer1.8 µM Enhancer

Cpf1 ribonucleoprotein complex concentration (µM)

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

effici

ency

(%)

Optimal Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 RNP concentration using Neon®

**

* = Toxicity

Page 22: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

22

Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 RNP editing efficiency—Nucleofector® vs. Neon® electroporation

38115-AS 38186-S 38228-S 38330-AS0102030405060708090

100

HEK 293 Cells

NFXNNeon

HPRT1 crRNA location and guide strand

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

efficie

ncy

(%)

5 µM RNP3 µM Enhancer

5 µM RNP1.8 µM Enhancer

Page 23: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

23

Alt-R™ Cpf1 Electroporation Enhancer does not alter indel profile

Indel Size Distribution - NGS - HEK293

Indel size (bp)-20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

Sequ

ence

s (%)

0

5

60

80

1000 µM Cpf1 Electroporation Enhancer3 µM Cpf1 Electroporation Enhancer

Page 24: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

24

Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 editing—time course

15 25 35 45 55 65 750102030405060708090

100

Time post-transfection (hr)

T7E

I tot

al e

ditin

g ef

ficie

ncy

(%)

15 25 35 45 55 65 750102030405060708090

100

38115-AS38186-S38228-S38330-AS

Time post-transfection (hr)

HEK293 HeLa5 µM RNP—3 µM Enhancer—Amaxa® Nucleofector ® System

T7E

I tot

al e

ditin

g ef

ficie

ncy

(%)

Page 25: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

25

Flanking arm

length

927257473727

Cpf1 cleavage

crRNA guide

GAATTC(EcoRI)

Total lengthssODN

190

150

120

100

80

60

Homology-directed repair in HEK 293–Cpf1 stable cell line

Page 26: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

26

Homology-directed repair in HEK 293–Cpf1 stable cell line

190

150

120

100 80 60 190

150

120

100 80 60

Non-targeted strand (nt) Targeted strand (nt)

0

20

40

60

80

100

HEK 293—HPRT1 38343-SRNAiMAX®—30 nM crRNA—30 ng HDR template (ssODN)

EcoRIT7

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

effici

ency

(%)

Page 27: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

27

Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 RNP delivery using lipofection

1:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 2:1 5:110 nM Cpf1 30 nM Cpf1 50 nM Cpf1

0102030405060708090

100

HEK 293—RNAiMAX™

Cpf1 concentration and ratio crRNA:Cpf1

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

effici

ency

(%)

* = Toxicity

* * * *

*

Page 28: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

28

Positive controls for genome editing using the Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 System

Hs - HEK 293 Mm - Hepa1-6 Rn - RAT20102030405060708090

100

5 µM RNP—3 µM EnhancerAmaxa® Nucleofector ® System

T7EI

tota

l edi

ting

effici

ency

(%)

Page 29: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

29

Comparison of genome editing using SpCas9 vs. AsCpf1

* Molecular weight of Alt-R™ Nuclease

† N = any base V = A, C, or GTTTV

Page 30: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

30

Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cpf1 System

Core components:• Alt-R CRISPR-Cpf1 crRNA• Alt-R A.s. Cpf1 Nuclease 2 NLS• Alt-R Cpf1 Electroporation EnhancerSequences for positive and negative crRNA controls for human, mouse, and rat are available at www.idtdna.com/CRISPR-Cpf1.

Also see our highly effective Alt-R CRISPR-Cas9 System at www.idtdna.com/CRISPR-Cas9.

Page 31: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

THANK YOU

31

Page 32: Cpf1-based genome editing using ribonucleoprotein complexes

Questions?

TALK TO A PERSON.Our experts are available for consultation.

“The people at @idtdna are

awesome. A+ for customer service.”

Nikolai Braun

Contact us by web chat, email, or phone.Find local contact details at: www.idtdna.com

“Best tech support ever, @idtdna!”Lauren Sakowski

32