cowels. ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of lake michigan (1899) plant...
TRANSCRIPT
Cowels
Ecological Relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of
Lake Michigan (1899)
• Plant Formations should be found that are rapidly changing to another type by means of changing environment.
• Can be seen in no better place than Sand Dunes due to instability..
• Plant Society – product of past and present environmental conditions
• Plant Formations are investigated– species composition
• The progressive changes that take place and the factors in the environment which caused these changes.
Ecological Factors
• Light and Heat– Open exposed to extremes
• Wind– From the North west, Michigan City dunes most
affected• Soil
– Quartz sand, deplete of organic material• Water
– Holding capacity of sand• Other factors
– Fire, topography, other animals and plants
Plant Societies
• Beach– Lower, middle, upper
• Embroyonic or Stationary Beach Dunes– Rapid growth, slow growth
• Active or Wandering Dune Complex– Transformation– Physical and Biological features– Encroachment– Capture (by vegetation)
Plant Societies of Chicago and Vicinity (1901)
Plant Succession: An analysis of the development of Vegetation (1916)
• “Treats the formation as an organism with structures and functions like an individual plant…. The formation is defined as the climax community of a natural area where the essential climatic [habitat] relations are similar or identical”
• “sere” - term used to describe the entire successional series, eg developmental process
• [Thus succession is development of a formation with infant, child, juvenile, and adult phases. But that can revert to earlier phases and start again.]– Clements 1919 comprehensive review
Primary Succession after Glacial Retreat
Bare glacial till Mosses, willow, dryas, fireweed, cottonwood in
the first 1 to 10 yearsWithin 10 years, sites are invaded by alder
which forms a dense thicket up to 9 m tall in about 50 years
Sites invaded by Sitka spruce, which after another 120 years form a dense forest
These forests are invaded by hemlock, which forms a climax spruce-hemlock forest after another 80 years in well drained sites
Form sphagnum bogs or muskeg in poorly drained sites
Changes in site conditions during succession after glaciers
• Decrease in soil pH• Increases in soil nitrogen with alder• Decreases in soil nitrogen after alder is
absent• Water logging and acidification of soils in
areas invaded by sphagnum
Reduction in soil drainage
• Addition of dead organic matter into the soil matrix reduces soil drainage
• In some sites, this leads to an increase of soil moisture over time
• Moss invades mature spruce/hemlock forests – produces more organic matter that reduces soil drainage creates highly acidic soils
• In poorly drained sites, soils become permanently saturated – trees die out and bogs are formed
Lake Michigan sand dunes
Key Issues for Community Change
1. What factors result or cause changes in the community?
2. Are community changes predictable?3. What types of changes are occurring?
• Directional change – Succession• Definition• Examples• Models of succession• Relationships between species• The climax community
• Cyclical change – Patch dynamics• Examples
In a climax community, how does a community maintain
its species composition?
• Gap dynamics – the process by which space created by a dying canopy tree is occupied by trees growing in the understory
• In a stable climax community, the species growing in the understory are similar to those growing in the canopy
Four stages in the heath community life cycle
Do certain plant species require small scale disturbances like gopher
mounds to propagate?
Seedling density differences (gopher - field)
Mol
veS
etgl
Pol
coL
ycal
Che
leS
chsc
Ber
inL
epde
And
geE
rasp
Oxa
stH
edhi
Sor
nuC
rete
Poa
prE
rica
Dig
isA
mba
r
-15-10
-505
1015
Species
De
ns
ity
(go
ph
er
- fi
eld
)
Conclusions
• Gophers do have significant effects on plant communities– Effects on succession – Pre-agriculture role
• Prairie restoration
The Next Step:• Continue analysis of data• Long term project--Add gophers to part of a gopher
free field and observe effects
Spatial gradients of sp richness-Gradients with altitude and depth
• Terrestrial environment:– altitude incr, S decr (fig 10.21)
• Aquatic environment: – depth incr, S decr (fig 10.22)
10.21
Temporal gradients of sp richness-- in a community (succession)
• Along a succession course – Hump curve predicted as model, – confirmed by plants succession– But, few studies on animals… fig 10.23
10.23
Simple model, d
Mechanisms of succession -- Connell-Slatyer Model
• Facilitation: pioneering sp modify the physical env in such a way as to facilitate colonization by later succession sp.
• Tolerance: one sp makes env less fit for its offspring although other sp are able to colonize and reproduce. replacement of early sp with others
• Inhibition: the early colonizer inhibit further colonization of the length of their life spans
Facilitation
A─→B─→C─→D
Inhibition
A ←─→ B
C ←─→ DTolerance
A─→B─→C─→D
The nature of the climax
• Definition: the final, self-perpetuating stage in a successional sequence.
• monoclimax, single regional climax, Clements
(1916,1936), • polyclimax: Tansley (1939), a series of local climax
states, determined by local soil and microclimate conditions, edaphic climax
• Pattern climax: mosaic of local edaphic climaxs that merge gradually into one another
The ATLSS Vegetative Succession Model
Scott M. Duke-Sylvester
ATLSS Project : University of Tennessee
Project web-site : www.atlss.orgE-mail : [email protected]
Overview
• Purpose of the model
• Application to restoration planning
• Model description
• Calibration/validation
• Development/delivery schedule
• Availability
Purpose of the vegetative succession model
• Provide vegetative succession dynamics• Modeling changes to habitat is important
for accurate modeling of higher trophic levels
• A rigorous succession model would include process dynamics : Everglades Landscape Model (ELM)
• The ATLSS objective is to interface with ELM, but also produce a alternative less complex succession model.
Application to restoration planning
• Provides another tool for assessing the potential for change due to alternative hydrologic scenarios– Directly through changes in habitat diversity
and structure• Diversity : number of species, evenness• Structure : tree islands
– Indirectly by providing a changing habitat for other models
Model features
• Time step : 1 year
• Spatial scale : 500x500 meters– Possibly finer if computationally feasible
• 58 habitat types (FGAP 6.6)
• Stochastic process influenced by local environmental processes
Model response
• The model will simulate succession dynamics in response to a number of environmental processes– Hydrologic disturbance : hydroperiod– Nutrient disturbance : phosphorus– Fire disturbance
• Response to disturbance is habitat type specific
Model description
• Space is broken into a set of discrete cells
• Cell model– Starts with a habitat type: H0
– Set of alternative habitat types : H1 .. Hn
– Transition probabilities from H0 to H0 .. Hn : P0 .. Pn
– P0 .. Pn depend on the current environmental conditions
• Cell model replicated in each discrete cell
Cell Model
• Allows for changes in cell habitat type
• Allows for changes in transition probabilities in response to changing environmental conditions
• Order of events:– Update current transition probabilities in
response to environmental change– Determine the new habitat type for the cell
Change in cell state
H0
H1
H2
Hn
P0
P1
P2
Pn
…