CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

CC103 ENGINEERING SURVEY

LAB NO:

TITTLE:

DATE OF

PRACTICAL:

DATE OF SUBMIT:

CLASS SESSION

NO NAME OF GROUP MEMBERS REGISTRATION NUMBER

LECTURERS NAME 1.

2.

COMMENT:

MARKS:

RUBRICS FOR LAB REPORT ASSESSMENT

RATING Excellent

4 Good

3 Fair

2 Poor

1 Lecturers

Assessment

Introduction (4%)

Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are sufficiently provided and the report are very well organized.

Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are available but not completely provided. The report still well organized.

Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are missing. Report is still reasonable well organized.

Summarized procedure and purposes of work with relevant background information are missing. Report is poorly organized.

Data collection and Recording

(10%)

Data collected is clearly written and appropriately tabulated; Data is within the expected norms.

Data collected is improperly tabulated (units missing) or the data deviates appreciably from the expected norms.

Some data is missing and / or data deviates drastically from the expected norms.

Data is poorly organized or grossly incomplete.

Analysis ( Calculations and Results )

(10%)

All required calculations are present and performed correctly; Results ( with % error where appropriate) are clearly stated.

All required calculations are present but minor errors are present in the calculations; Result section is incomplete (i.e. % error values are reported without the values they refer to)

Some calculations are missing and / or there are significant errors in the calculations.

Calculations are grossly incomplete and / or incorrect.

Problem solving (4%)

Discussion of results shows a strong grasp of the scientific concepts covered by the lab.

Discussion of results needs some refinement but shows a reasonably grasp of the scientific concepts covered by the lab.

Discussion on results does not identify appropriate concepts, needs significant work and / or show a weak grasp of concepts.

Discussion on results is inappropriate for the lab and shows a lack of comprehension of scientific concepts.

Timeliness (2 %)

Report handed it on time

Report handed not in time