coursework report biochemical engg

Upload: abhishek-singh

Post on 08-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    1/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    FUNDAMENTALS OF BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING

    = 2RT

    () +

    4 ()

    1

    This represents the equation of state which is mc millan mayer free energy.

    Where,

    T = temperature

    V= volume of the solution

    2= protein molar density

    R= ideal gas constant

    Nav= avogadros number

    d2= protein diameter

    = fraction of the solution taken up the protein molecules

    r= centre-to-centre separations between a pair of molecules.

    1) Derive an analytical expression for the osmotic pressure and the proteinchemical potential.

    Chemical potential is given by,

    =id

    +ex

    We have the equation,

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    2/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    =

    =

    () + () +2

    ()

    2

    Now solve the partial differentiation part

    ()

    4 3 (1 )

    We know that=

    ,

    Using the above formula we get,

    () =

    ()()()()()

    Now simplifying this equation we get,

    () =

    ()

    Substituting this in eqn 2,

    2RT

    ()

    3

    Now solve ,

    We know =

    =

    4

    Now substitute eqn 4 in eqn 3 we get,

    2RT

    ()

    5

    Now solve the second term in eqn 2 i.e ,

    4 () 6

    We know that w(r)= -(

    )7

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    3/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    Now substitute eqn 7 in 6,

    = 4 (-(

    ))dr

    Simplifying the above eqn,

    =

    8

    Substitute eqn 8 and 5 in eqn 2 we get,

    = RT

    () +RT

    ()

    +

    Since we know =

    so substituting this in the second term of the above eqn,

    = RT () +RT

    ()+

    9

    Now simplifying eqn 9 we get,

    ex=RT(

    () )+

    10

    total chemical potential is given by,

    =i.d+e.x 11

    =e.x12

    i.d=RT ln213

    Now substitute 10 & 13 in eqn 11 we get,

    = RT ln2+ RT(

    () )+

    14

    eqn 14 depicts the protein chemical potential.

    i) Osmotic pressure

    The relation between osmotic pressure and macmillan mayer free energy is given by,

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    4/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    F=-V+2N2 15

    Considering excess conditions,

    Fe.x

    =-e.x

    V+2N216

    Divide eqn 16 by v,

    . =-

    e.x+

    17

    Since =218

    Substitute 18 in 17 we get,

    . = -

    e.x+

    e.x2

    e.x= e.x2-. 19

    Substitute 10 & 1 in 19 we get,

    e.x=2RT(

    () )+

    20

    But we know that =i.d+

    e.x21

    i.d=2RT 22

    After Substituting 22 and 20 in 21 and simplifying we get \,

    =2RT(

    () )+

    23.

    The equation 23 depicts the osmotic pressure derivation.

    2) Determine the spinodial(T vs ) and the critical point for a solution withsalt concentration equal to 1.0 M and the range of the potential n equal to6.

    Spinodal curve is used to find the stability of the solution. Basically its a limit; within this limit

    any small fluctuation (infinitesimal) with respect to temperature, pressure and other parameters

    will lead to spinodal decomposition. spinodal decomposition is the decomposition of the solution

    When there is a change in the thermodynamic parameters such as temperature into multiple

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    5/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    changes. Above this curve the solution is exposed to fluctuations but it is metastable. Now we

    have the lysozyme solution on which the salting out process is done and now ready for the phase

    separations. We have to calculate all the thermodynamic parameters for the liquids which are

    later used in phase separations. Now we have to find the spinodial and the critical temperature

    for the lysozyme solution. Now in a phase separation, there are 2 phases one phase which is light

    and is the top layer whereas the dense phase forms the bottom layer. So we are splitting it into

    two phases 2L which represents the light phase (top layer) and 2D represents the dense phase

    (bottom layer) which are the protein molar densities of the lysozyme solution. In mathcad, we

    first derived the osmotic pressure and the chemical potential and we split it into dense and light

    components. Since we have two phases which are light and dense there are two chemical

    potentials (2L and 2D). Now to check the equation we calculated the chemical potentials of

    both light and dense as a function of molar density and temperature.

    The figure above depicts the spinodal curve for light molar density lysozyme solution in

    the protein phase diagram where chemical potential (as function of molar density and

    temperature) is taken versus its molar density.

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    6/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    The figure above depicts the spinodal curve for dense molar density lysozyme solution in

    the protein phase diagram where chemical potential (as function of molar density and

    temperature) is taken versus its molar density.

    From both graph the curve looks similar because they both are the same components but with

    dense and light phases.any point above the curve will result in a single phase and below that

    will result into two phases (spinodal decomposition).then we took the graph of osmoticpressure versus the molar density (both light and dense) to get the spinodal curve.

    2D

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    7/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    The above graph depicts the spinodal where the osmotic pressure is plotted versus molar

    density.

    Now we have to find the critical point which is the extreme point of spinodal curve. In order

    to find this we equate the osmotic pressure (both first derivative and second deriavative) to

    zero.

    02

    2

    2 T,( )d

    d

    2

    Using mathcad we get the following solution,

    2L=9.372

    T=328.264

    Now plotting the graph temperature versus molar density of the protein we get the spinodal

    curve of the lysozyme protein density.

    The figure above depicts the spinodal curve and the critical point (the peak of the curve) of the

    lysozyme solution where above the curve it will give a stable solution and if it is below it leads to

    decomposition into two phases (slow crystallization). Also if its even below the co existence curve

    spontaneously decompose.

    02

    2 T,( )d

    d=

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    8/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    3) calculate the liquid-liquid co-existence curve (T vs ) for solutions at salt

    concentration equal to 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5M with n equal to 6.

    Liquid liquid co-existence curve is defined as the condition where the 2 distinct liquid phases

    may co-exist. In this condition the chemical potential of a particular solution component is equal

    in that distinct phase of the solution in which it exists. In order to calculate the Liquid liquid co-

    existence we defined the chemical potential and osmotic pressure of both light and dense

    components in mathcad. Then we adjusted the salt concentration(3) to 0.5,1.0 and 1.5. after

    adjusting we input values of T(200),2L(0.5) and 2D(20). The critical point of 2 was found to

    be 9.372 so we adjusted 2L9.4 so that in lies in the range of critical point.then

    we equated the chemical potential and osmotic pressure of both light and dense fluids to each

    other.

    L 2L T,( ) D 2D T,( )

    From the above equation we found various values CO as a function of T with find command in

    mathcad to give us various values of temperature and the corresponding 2L and 2D which was

    written in a excel sheet. Plotting the graph give us Liquid liquid co-existence curve for 3=0.5,

    1.0 and 1.5 with n=6 as constant.

    2L 2L T,( ) 2D 2D T,( )=

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    0 10 20 30

    Light fluid

    Dense fluid

    3=0.5

    temperature

    2

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    9/17

    The above three graphs shows di

    constant n=6.the critical tempera

    solution has less components of

    concentration increases and after

    temperature at more and more sa

    dense fluid starts at the critical te

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    0 5 10

    temperature

    0

    50100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    0 1

    tem

    perature

    ABHISEK

    MSc BIO

    7810595

    fferent Liquid liquid co-existence curve for di

    ture rises as the concentration of the salt is incr

    rotein and more concentration of the salt as the

    the critical point the curve slides down becaus

    lt concentration. The light fluid may end at criti

    mp and slide down with changing molar densit

    15 20 25 30

    Light fluid

    Dense flui

    2

    0 20 30

    Light fluid

    dense fluid

    3=1.5

    2

    UMRAO SINGH

    TECHNOLOGY

    ferent 3 but

    ased. The

    salt

    of less

    cal temp and

    (2).

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    10/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    4) Determine the effect of changing n on the liquid-liquid co-existencecurve for a solution with salt concentration equal to 1.0 M. What are the

    implications of this result for the shape of the protein phase diagram?

    For this problem, in mathcad we have previously defined chemical potential, osmotic pressure

    and also the critical point for both light and dense. Now we change n from values 1 to 9 so

    totally 8 cases keeping everything constant and salt concentration to 1.0 M. we feeded the values

    into an excel and plotted the graphs.

    -1000

    -800

    -600

    -400

    -200

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30

    n=1(light)

    n=1(dense)

    n=2(light)

    n=2(dense)

    n=4(light)

    n=4(dense)

    n=5(light)

    n=5(dense)

    tem

    erature

    2

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30

    n=6(light)

    n=6(dense)

    n=7(light)

    n=7(dense)

    n=8(light)

    n=8(dense)

    n=9(light)

    n=9(dense)

    temperature

    2

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    11/17

    From the temperature vs. 2 gra

    molecules that surrounds the pro

    temperature (becomes positive)

    that harbour the protein. at n=3 t

    potential equation (n-3).liquid li

    disordered phases. One dilute wi

    concentrated with a protein (whi

    process, first we take little amou

    concentration increases the attrabelow the spinodal curve, there i

    buries into the spinodal giving a

    liquids. From the critical temper

    decreases. This results in less are

    increased are above the curve w

    critical temperature decreases an

    5) What happens if theWhy does this happ

    We know that w(r) is the

    center-to-center separatio

    attractive forces between

    -1500

    -1000

    -500

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    0 5

    critical

    n

    ABHISEK

    MSc BIO

    7810595

    h, it implies that as the n which is the variable

    tein increases the temperature also decreases. A

    ecreases as n increases. This is due to more pro

    e whole function becomes infinite due the ter

    uid equilibrium exists where there is a equilibri

    th the protein (which forms liquid after salting

    h forms crystals) which is disordered phases.

    nt of the salt to be added to the protein solution.

    tive forces between the proteins also increasess a slow crystallization but as the salt is increas

    liquid- liquid phase which the solution decomp

    ture vs. n graph as the n increases the critical t

    a which is below the curve where the protein cr

    ich represents stable protein. So as more the n i

    d the liquid-liquid separation will be ineffective

    range ofw(r) becomes very large (i.e.

    n?

    attractive forces between the protein molecules

    ns between a pair of proteins. As the w(r) range

    a pair of protein increases which results in prec

    10 15

    emperature vs n

    critical

    temperature

    UMRAO SINGH

    TECHNOLOGY

    f proteins

    t n=4, the

    tein molecules

    of the chemical

    um for two

    ut) and the other

    uring salting out

    As the salt

    nd it goesd further it

    ses into 2

    mperature

    ystallizes and

    ncreases the

    .

    mall n)?

    where r is the

    increases the

    ipitation. As

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    12/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    previously explained we know that as n reduces the critical temp increases which results

    in liquid- liquid separations. Increasing salt solution moves the protein into crystal-liquidphase where the concentrated protein becomes crystal and the dilute ones becomes liquid.

    But at this point we have a large activation barrier in this region which prevents the

    protein crystallization and as more salt concentration is increased the protein decomposes

    into liquids and the separation is ineffective. And above the co-existence curve theprotein becomes stable. So having small n will make large liquid- liquid phase and higher

    critical temperature so that the protein crystallizes in the crystal-liquid phase andovercomes the activation barrier.

    MATHCAD

    T 200 350..:=

    R 8.314:=

    Nav 6.2031023

    :=

    3.14:=

    3 1.0:=

    Kb RNav

    :=

    Kb 750 1203+( ):=

    d2

    3.5 109

    :=

    d2

    3.5 109

    :=

    n 6:=

    d2( )

    3 Nav

    6:=

    *

    2 T,( ) 2R T2( )

    22( )

    3 2 ( )+ 1+

    1 2 ( )3

    2 Nav( )2

    d2( )

    32( )

    2

    3 n( )

    +:=

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    13/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    L

    d2( )

    3 Nav

    6:=

    2L 2L T,( ) T R ln 2L( ) T R8 L 2L( ) 9 L 2L( )

    2 3 L 2L( )

    3+

    1 L 2L( )[ ]3

    +

    4 Nav22L d

    2( )3

    3 n( )

    +:=

    D

    d2( )

    3 Nav

    6:=

    2D 2D T,( ) T R( ) ln 2D( ) T R8 D 2D( ) 9 D 2D( )

    2 3 D 2D( )

    3+

    1 D 2D( )[ ]3

    +

    4 Nav22D d

    2( )3

    3 n( )

    +:=

    2L 1 200,( ) 615.298=

    2L 2 200,( ) 67.689=

    2L 0.1 0.2, 60..:=

    2L 2L 250,( )

    3-4.84310

    3-3.4610

    3-2.67410

    3-2.13310

    3-1.72610

    3-1.40410

    3-1.1410

    -919.031

    -730.557

    -567.776

    -425.755

    -300.852

    -190.304

    -91.959

    -4.112

    ...

    =

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    14/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    2D 2D 250,( )

    3-4.84310

    3-3.4610

    3-2.67410

    3-2.13310

    3-1.72610

    3-1.40410

    3-1.1410

    -919.031

    -730.557

    -567.776

    -425.755

    -300.852

    -190.304

    -91.959

    -4.112

    ...

    =

    2D 1 200,( ) 615.298=

    2D 2 200,( ) 67.689=

    2D 0.1 0.2, 60..:=

    1 200,( ) 1.356 103

    =

    2 200,( ) 2.112 103

    =

    2 0.1 0.2, 60..:=

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    15/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    2 250,( )

    204.984

    404.253

    597.832

    785.744

    968.016

    31.14510

    31.31610

    31.48110

    31.64110

    31.79610

    31.94510

    32.08810

    32.22610

    32.35910

    32.48610

    ...

    =

    2 1:=

    T 250:=

    Given

    02

    2 T,( )d

    d

    02

    2

    2 T,( )d

    d

    2

    Find 2 T,( )9.372

    328.264

    =

    Given

    02

    2 T,( )d

    d

    T 2( ) Find T( ):=

    2 0.1 0.2, 40..:=

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    16/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    L

    d2( )

    3 Nav

    6:=

    *

    L 2L T,( ) 2L( )R T2L( ) L( )[ ]

    22L( ) L( )[ ]

    3 2L( ) L( )[ ]+ 1+

    1 2L( ) L( )[ ][ ]3

    2 Nav( )2

    d2( )

    32L( )

    2

    3 n( )

    +:=

    2L 2L T,( ) T R ln 2L( ) T R8 L 2L( ) 9 L 2L( )

    2 3 L 2L( )

    3+

    1 L 2L( )[ ]3

    +

    4 Nav22L d

    2( )3

    3 n( )

    +:=

    D

    d2( )

    3 Nav

    6:=

    *

    D 2D T,( ) 2D( )R T2D( ) D( )[ ]

    22D( ) D( )[ ]

    3 2D( ) D( )[ ]+ 1+

    1 2D( ) D( )[ ][ ]3

    2 Nav( )2

    d2( )

    32D( )

    2

    3 n( )

    +:=

    2D 2D T,( ) T R( ) ln 2D( ) T R8 D 2D( ) 9 D 2D( )2 3 D 2D( )3+

    1 D 2D( )[ ]3

    +4 Nav

    2

    2D d 2( )3

    3 n( )

    +:=

    T 200:=

    2L 0.5:=

    2D 20:=

    Given

    2L 2L T,( ) 2D 2D T,( )

    L 2L T,( ) D 2D T,( )

    2L 9.

  • 8/7/2019 coursework report biochemical engg

    17/17

    ABHISEKH UMRAO SINGH

    MSc BIOTECHNOLOGY

    7810595

    2D 9.>

    CO T( ) Find 2L 2D,( ):=

    CO 300( )3.615

    17.135

    =