costs driving employer action against obesity

12
1 Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago Jon Gabel, Senior Fellow In conjunction with: The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services

Upload: kelly-shelton

Post on 30-Dec-2015

15 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity. National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago Jon Gabel, Senior Fellow In conjunction with: The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services. Major Findings. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

1

Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago

Jon Gabel, Senior Fellow

In conjunction with:

The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services

Page 2: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

2

Major Findings

• Both employers and employees see weight management programs as appropriate and effective.– 71% of employers view offering obesity-related services as appropriate – 80% of employees, regardless of weight, agree healthful lifestyles/weight

management programs belong in the workplace – 73% of employers view offering obesity-related services as effective

• 67% of employers are concerned about the effects of obesity on medical claims expenses

• 93% of employers see obesity as a preventable condition and the result of poor lifestyle choices

• Less than half of employers believe their company has given enough attention to the problem of obesity

Page 3: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

3

Source: NORC/George Washington University Survey on Employer and Employee Views of Obesity, 2007

Objectives

• To document current weight management programs offered at the workplace

• To learn about employers’ and employees attitudes about obesity

• To examine employees’ views on weight management programs at the workplace

Page 4: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

4

Study Methods

• National Research LLP conducted interviews with employee benefit managers from 505 public and private employers with 50 or more workers. All firms surveyed also offered health insurance.

• Employers were randomly selected from a list of the nation’s employers compiled by Dun and Bradstreet.

• Interviews were conducted from October through December 2007.

• Random selection allows one to extrapolate from sample to U.S. population for typical employer.

Page 5: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

5

Source: NORC/George Washington University Survey on Employer and Employee Views of Obesity, 2007

• ICR conducted telephone interviews with 1,352 persons in January 2008

– Age 18-64

– Employed full or part-time

– Employer had 50 or more workers

– Employee was enrolled in an employer or employee-sponsored plan.

• The study uses statistical weights to extrapolate to the relevant US population

Study Methods

Page 6: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

6

Most Employers See Obesity as a Preventable Condition and the Result of Poor Lifestyle Choices

5%

21%

23%

11%

28%

49%

16%

36%

57%

57%

70%

59%

44%

2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Futile to treat

Out of someone's control

A disease

The result of poor willpower

Genetic in origin

A preventable condition

The result of poor lifestyle choices

Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree

Chart # 17

Page 7: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

7

A Majority of Employers Are Concerned about Medical Costs Associated with Obesity

32%

26%

39%

47%

47%

40%

41%

50%*

41%*

22%*

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

5000+ Workers

1000-4999 Workers

200-999 Workers

50-199 Workers

Overall

Very Concerned Somewhat Concerned

Chart # 14

* Estimate is significantly different from all other firms by response category.

Page 8: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

8

Employers Think Weight Management Programs Are Appropriate -- Cite Costs as Major Reason

26%

71%

56%54%

41%

52%

58%

92%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Yes * Employer Pays LargeShare of Premium

Firm Hopes to Save onPremium Expenses

Productivity Issue

Overall Jumbo firms (5000+ Workers)

Chart # 3

* Jumbo firm estimate is significantly different from all other firms.

Page 9: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

9

Most Firms Think Weight Management Programs are Effective, Want More Evidence

73%

46%45%

41%

63%

86%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Yes * It shows employees that obesityis serious and important *

There is evidence that it works

Overall Jumbo firms (5000+ Workers)

Chart # 4

* Jumbo firm estimate is significantly different from all other firms.

Page 10: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

10

Eight Out of Ten Employees – No Matter Their Weight – Say Weight Management Programs Belong at Work

Exhibit 3

Source: NORC/George Washington University Survey on Employer and Employee Views of Obesity, 2007

* Tests found no significantly different estimates from all other BMI levels

Page 11: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

11

Employers: “Has your firm given enough resources to fight obesity?”

11%

13%

13%

21%

12%

32%

30%

43%

25%

32%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

50-199 workers

200-999 workers

1,000+ workers

5,000+ workers

All Firms

Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree

Chart # 2

* Tests found no significantly different estimates from all other firms by response category.

Page 12: Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity

12

Comparison of Weight Categorization, Body Mass Index Versus Self-reported

Self Perceived Weight Categorization Body Mass Index (BMI) Weight Categorization

12

Source: NORC/George Washington University Survey on Employer and Employee Views of Obesity, 2007

Exhibit 1

Normal, 55%

Overweight, 39%

Obese, 2%

Underweight, 4%

Normal, 32%

Overweight, 40%

Obese, 26%

Underweight, 2%