cost benefit analysis guidelines

8
GUIDELINES FOR RISK ANALYSIS IN THE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTEWATER PROJECTS DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION – Rationale for these guidelines The Standard Application for Major Project Request for Confirmation of Assistance under Article 40 (e) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/ 2006 – European Regional Development Fund / Cohesion Fund Infrastructure Investment requires a “Risk Assessment” to be undertaken. “E.3.1 Short description of methodology and summary results; E.3.2 Sensitivity analysis that presents the estimated effects on financial and economic performance indicators of changes in variables tested including identification of critical variables 1 and the switching values of the critical variables; E.3.3 Risk analysis involving a description of the probability distribution estimate of the project’s financial and economic performance indicators” Objectives for these guidelines The main objective of these guidelines is to provide the basic structure and methodological tools for undertaking the risk and sensitivity analysis within the overall cost benefit analysis in water and wastewater sector taking into account: the context in which these projects are being prepared; the difficulties of the cost benefit analysis process in the environment sector; the requirements of the EU regulations and related documents for the processing and approval of EU funded projects. Needs for Sensitivity and Risk Analysis The sensitivity and risk analysis process is intended to: identify those factors that are key determinants of project outcomes; determine the likelihood of individual project returns being unacceptable owing to risk; 1 According to the EU Guidance (2006 – Working Document 4) for the New Programming Period 2007 -2013 – Guidance on the methodology for carrying out cost benefit analysis, all and any variables are “critical” whose 1% change (either in the positive or negative direction) results in at least 5% change in the NPV. 1

Upload: rahul-awade

Post on 17-Aug-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

The main objective of these guidelines is to provide the basic structure and methodological tools for undertaking the risk and sensitivity analysis within the overall cost benefit analysis in water and wastewater sector

TRANSCRIPT

GUIDELINES FOR RISK ANALYSIS IN THE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OFWATER AND WASTEWATER PROJECTSDRAFT FOR DISCUSSION Rationale fo t!e"e #$i%eline"The Standard Application for Major Project Requet for Confir!ation of Aitance under Article "#$e% of Re&ulation $'C% No (#)*+ ,##- 'uropean Re&ional De.elop!ent Fund + Coheion FundInfratructure In.et!ent require a /Ri0 Ae!ent1 to 2e underta0en3E.3.1 Short description of methodology and summary results;E.3.2 Sensitivity analysis that presents the estimated effects on financial and economicperformance indicators ofchanges in variables tested includingidentificationofcritical variables1 and the switching values of the critical variables;E.3.3 Ris analysis involving a description of the probability distribution estimate of thepro!ect"s financial and economic performance indicators#O&'e(ti)e" fo t!e"e #$i%eline"The !ain o2jecti.e of thee &uideline i to pro.ide the 2aic tructure and !ethodolo&ical toolfor underta0in& the ri0 and eniti.it4 anal4i 5ithin the o.erall cot 2enefit anal4i in 5ater and5ate5ater ector ta0in& into account6 the conte7t in 5hich thee project are 2ein& prepared8 the difficultie of the cot 2enefit anal4i proce in the en.iron!ent ector8 the require!ent of the 'U re&ulationandrelated docu!ent forthe procein&andappro.al of 'U funded project3Nee%" fo Sen"iti)it* an% Ri"+ Anal*"i"The eniti.it4 and ri0 anal4i proce i intended to6 identif4 thoe factor that are 0e4 deter!inant of project outco!e8 deter!ine the li0elihood of indi.idual project return 2ein& unaccepta2le o5in& to ri08 dei&n!eaure5ithintheproject en.iron!ent anditector conte7t to!iti&atetheidentified ri0 ariin& fro! the identified 0e4 factor3Fortheepurpoe9 thefirt part of theanal4i$eniti.it4anal4i% ai!toidentif4the0e4.aria2leandtheir potential i!pact onprofita2ilit4indicator3 Theecondpart $ri0anal4i%atte!pt to eti!ate the pro2a2ilit4 of thee chan&e ta0in& place 5ith the reult e7preed a aneti!ated !ean and tandard de.iation of the indicator3The rele.ant indicator calculated afterthe 'U &rant that hould 2e conidered in underta0in& the ri0 and eniti.it4 anal4i are6 FRR+C and correpondin& FNP:+C8 'RR and correpondin& 'NP:3;here the reult of the ri0 and eniti.it4 anal4i ho5 0e4 cot or 2enefit para!eter to ha.e a!aterial i!pact on project .ia2ilit49 it i then necear4 to conider 5hat chan&e are required tothe project tructure to !iti&ate the potential ri031 Accordin& to the 'U turn cot E(F Decreae of 7? in project out>turn cot E(F Decreae of 7? in re.enue E,F Increae of 7? in re.enue E,F Decreae of 7? in OGM cot E*F Increae of 7? in OGM cot E*F Increae of 7? in econo!ic 2enefit Decreae of 7? in econo!ic 2enefit E(F Financial cot in the cae of FRR+C and FNP: and econo!ic cot in the cae of 'RR and 'NP:3E,F Total re.enue in the cae of hitorical re!ainin& cot !ethod and incre!ental re.enue other5ie3E*F For FRR+CandFNP:9total financial OGMcot inthecaeof hitorical re!ainin&cot !ethodandincre!entalfinancial OGM cot other5ie3 For 'RR and 'NP:9 incre!ental econo!ic OGM cot3T5o point hould 2e clearl4 tated6 A project re.enue are not an econo!ic 2enefit the eniti.it4 anal4i hould not 2eunderta0en to e7a!ine the i!pact of chan&e in project re.enue on the econo!ic rate ofreturn and econo!ic net preent .alue3 Si!ilarl49 econo!ic 2enefit are not a financial re.enue and hence the eniti.it4 anal4ihould not 2e underta0en to e7a!ine the i!pact of chan&e in econo!ic 2enefit on thefinancial net preent .alue31.1.2 Determining Switching Values of the Critical VariablesThe 5itchin& .alue i the percenta&e chan&e in a .aria2le for the NP: 2eco!e Hero or the IRRequal the opportunit4 cot of capital and hence the project deciion to chan&e3 The 5itchin&.alue therefore deter!ine the chan&e in the identified critical .aria2le at 5hich point a deciionconcernin& the .ia2ilit4 of the project9 under it initial confi&uration9 hould 2e i!ple!ented3The5itchin& .alue anal4i pro.ide the 2ac0&round for underta0in& the ri0 anal4i3The 5itchin& .alue hould 2e calculated a part of the projectA econo!ic and financial anal4i3It requireaniterati.eanal4itodeter!inetherequiredpercenta&echan&eina.aria2letochan&e the projectA net preent .alue to Hero3 The chan&e need to 2e applied on an annual2ai to the identified critical .aria2le9 5ith each critical .aria2le 2ein& eparatel4 identified3The.aria2le that need to 2e conidered hould include all identified /critical1 .aria2le and an4 u2co!ponent 5here the critical .aria2le i !ade up of e.eral part31.2 is! AnalysisRi0 anal4i e7a!ine the pro2a2ilit4 5ith 5hich the required chan&e in a .aria2le ha a !ateriali!pact on project .ia2ilit43In the coure of ri0 anal4i9 the follo5in& ri0 are e7a!ined6 Intheli&ht of their influenceonthefinancial andperfor!anceindicator9 ri0ariin&o5in& to .aria2le that are dee!ed a critical8 Other ri03The a2o.e ri0 hould 2e anal4ed in detail uin& a quantified approach3The 'U