cost assessment data enterprise...what is happening with cost performance index (cpi) across the two...
TRANSCRIPT
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE
24 June 2020
FlexFiles Update & DAU Webcast
2
AgendaImplementation
• FlexFile and Quantity Data Report have replaced DD 1921 Series as the default required cost reporting requirement for newly approved CSDR plans as of 15 May 2019 (per DDCA memo)
• Some tailoring of the DID requirements may be proposed by the CWIPT (e.g., time-phasing for periods longer than a month)
• If there is context-specific rationale, e.g. the reporting contractor and effort being performed make it unlikely the additional insight provided will be utilized, then the CWIPT may propose to use the DD 1921 series
Jack Titus- CDSG CADE Validations [email protected]
Torri Preston - CDSGCADE Training & Engagement Lead
Benjamin Berkman - CDSGCADE FlexFile Support
Peter Braxton - CDSGCADE DAU Lead
Ryan Horn - CDSGCADE Training Support / LMS Lead
DoDI 5000.73 Update
OSD CAPE Policy Update
DAU Webcast
FlexFile Overview
FlexFile Data Groups
FlexFile Submissions
FlexFile Exports
CADE Data Access & Analytics Demo
DAU Webcast
DoDI 5000.73 Update
• Approved by DCAPE, dtd 13 Mar 2020 (1st update since 2015)• Alignment with Acquisition Pathways
• Major Capability Acquisitions – traditional MDAPs• Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) Programs – aka Section 808• Defense Business Systems (DBS) – Artist Formerly Known As MAIS• Contracted Services• Software
• Importance of uploading documentation to CADE Library• Clear CSDR requirements by Acquisition Pathway (Table 1)
• In a nutshell, ACAT I and II level programs
• Access via https://cade.osd.mil/News/blog
DAU Webcast
6CSDR applies to more programs than ever!
Replaces DoDI 5000.02 Table 7
COVID-19 Background and TimelineDAU Webcast
8
Effort to effectively capture COVID-19 cost, schedule, and performance impacts has been and will remain an iterative and collaborative process between Government and Industry
March April May June+
Reviewed lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina• Determined similarities
between Hurricane Katrina and potential impacts of COVID-19
• Interviewed SMEs with experience using data from that timeframe
• Reviewed CCDRs and CPRs from contractors who were impacted by the storm
• Reviewed studies highlighting macro level impacts from that timeframe
Worked with leadership to develop memo• Goal is to account for COVID-19
impacts without being overly prescriptive or burdensome on Industry
• Ideal “win-win” solution aligns Industry data collection with Government data reporting
• Memo signed May 27th and posted on the CADE public website
Hosted Mini-Focus Group to solicit community feedback• Collected information from
Services to determine information required and suggested medium for collecting data
• Surveyed industry to understand current impacts, previous experiences, and actions that are currently being taken/will be taken during the crisis
Continue dialogue at Cost IPT and CADE Focus Group• Will continue to iterate and
collect lessons learned to provide industry clear guidance on how to report impacts
• CIPT 22 Jun – update on impacts and approaches
• Focus Group 21 Oct –continuous collaboration and feedback loop
Legend
Hurricane Katrina Cost ImpactsDAU Webcast
Like Katrina, COVID-19 impacts are expected to be wide-ranging and long-lasting9
Katrina Impacts Cost
Change in Ship EAC Damage Down Time
Direct Labor Hours DL Rate
Pre-K K Impact Pre-K K Impact
Facilities
CFE//GFE
DL OH
DL MnHr Growth
Hours, Loss in Productivity
InsurancePremiums
Depreciation
Vendor Premiums
OH Rate Material Cost
Pre-K K Impact
MedicalDL Ratesgo up
Same Labor Problems
Transportation
Outsourcing
Indirect LRgoes up
Ship Damage
SHIP Damage
SHIP Damage
GovernmentCost
InsuranceClaims
Mixture
Ad hoc data collection was the main data source to develop estimates of Katrina impacts. Recommend programs document plan to capture COVID-19 impacts and share with CAPE, the Services, and A&S
10
Hurricane Katrina vs. COVID-19 Compare and ContrastDAU Webcast
Katrina COVID-19 Consequence
Acute Prolonged Untangling Katrina effects was necessarily reactive; here we have the chance to be proactive!
Regional(Natural Disaster)
National(Global Pandemic)
Katrina primarily affected Ingalls (Pascagoula, MS) and Avondale (LA) shipyards; COVID affects entire supply chain!
Insurable Not Insurable No “physical loss or damage,” likely that Government will bear the brunt of COVID-19 impacts
Impact Model* Unknown / Unlikely Advanced Learning Model (ALM); With no model in place to quantify impacts a priori, proper tagging of impact data becomes all the more crucial
Local IT / Hard Copy, COOP Response Robust Cloud Infrastructure Firms should be much better positioned both to minimize White Collar impacts (i.e., WFH)
and to capture Blue Collar impacts (see below)
Infrastructure Damage Preventative Measures Firms already implementing health and security procedures, reconfiguring plant layouts, etc.; mixture of Direct and Indirect
Workforce Displacement
WorkforceDisruption
Green Labor effect predicted by ALM 2*; only expected insofar as employees die (!) or leave for personal reasons
Work Stoppage (extended) Work Stoppage (temporary) Loss of Learning due to Interval predicted by ALM 1*; expected where production restrictions result in significant delays
Work Disruption Work Disruption Without proper data tagging, it was practically impossible to attribute unproductive time, partially productive time, SWBS, etc.
* “An Enterprise Model of Rising Ship Costs: Loss of Learning Due to Time between Ships and Labor Force Instability,” Richard L. Coleman, et al., Department of the Navy Cost Analysis Symposium (DoNCAS), September, 2008.
Mat
eria
l Diff
eren
ces
Resu
ltant
Impa
cts
OSD CAPE Memo sets the stage for more specific guidance11
Summary of Current Guidance
• Guidance Memo Ultimate Objectiveo Government and Industry both need to be tackling the problem of tracking COVID-19 effectso Coordinated with ASD(A) and Service Acquisition Executives (SAEs)o Including Defense Pricing and Contracting (DPC) and Earned Value Management (EVM)o Links to DPC and other guidance in Back-up
• Memo Highlightso Government and Industry work together to develop approach to capturing COVID-19 effectso Effects should be discernible from non-COVID-19 factors to the maximum extent practicableo Effects should be included and documented in CSDR and IPMDAR deliverableso Neither contract changes nor allowability of costs implied
• Additional Guidance Pendingo Eschewed “Attachment A” in initial memo with more specific guidanceo This CIPT meeting is the next step toward developing that more specific guidance
DAU Webcast
Now is the time to make your voice heard!
• Looking at the problem from both sideso Industry – “forward pass” – how are impacts accounted for and reportedo Government – “backward pass” – how are historical data normalized and analyzed
• Common Goalso Industry and Government both seeking to understand the impacts of COVID-19 so that the “underlying
actuals” can be effectively used as the basis for proposals and estimateso Also informs future Risk Management (“COVID-19 was not a black swan…”)
• Future Guidanceo Seek to be comprehensive in treatment of scenarios, impacts, and reporting mechanismso Furlough, plant shutdown, additional health and security measures, production line reconfiguration, supply
chain disruption, etc.
12
Objective of Shaping Future GuidanceDAU Webcast
Cost Data – Basis for an Analogy Estimate
Problem
• A project started in mid-2019 and concluded in mid-2021
• Total cost was $5.9M
Questions
• What was the (approximate) burn rate?
• What adjustments might you need to make to this data point if used as the basis of an estimate?
Every program is either “lucky” or “unlucky”13
Conceptual FrameworkDAU Webcast
This series of slides was presented to the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) Masters of Cost Estimating and Analysis (MCEA) program on April 15th, 2020
Risk Data – Plans vs. Actuals
Problem
• Project start was 01 Jul 2019
• Originally planned to conclude on 31 Dec 2020 at a budget of $3.6Mo Actual finish was mid-May 2021
Questions
• What was planned burn rate?
• What is Cost Growth Factor (CGF)?
• What is Schedule Growth Factor (SGF)?
Program growth may result from endogenous and exogenous risks14
Conceptual FrameworkDAU Webcast
Recall that Time-Phased Actuals is one of the FlexFile “Big Three”15
Conceptual FrameworkDAU Webcast
CCDR Data (1921) – Limited Time-Phasing
• CCDR Annual Reports as of the end of each calendar year
• In which report did WBS 1 growth show up?
• In which report did WBS 2 growth show up?
Initial 2019 2020 2021 TotalWBS1 $0.6M $0.6M -- $1.2MWBS2 -- $2.4M -- $2.4MTotal $0.6M $3.0M -- $3.6M
Year 1 (2019) 2019 2020 2021 TotalWBS1 $0.6M -- -- $0.6MWBS2 -- -- -- --Total $0.6M -- -- $0.6M
Year 2 (2020) 2019 2020 2021 TotalWBS1 $0.6M $1.3M -- $1.9MWBS2 -- $2.8M -- $2.8MTotal $0.6M $4.1M -- $4.7M
Year 3 (2021) 2019 2020 2021 TotalWBS1 $0.6M $1.3M $0.1M $2.0MWBS2 -- $2.8M $1.1M $3.9MTotal $0.6M $4.1M $1.2M $5.9MAnnual phasing the best
you can do without EVM/FlexFiles
EVM Data – Progress Metrics
• Monthly IPMDAR data identify performance issues
• What is happening with Cost Performance Index (CPI) across the two WBS elements?
• What is happening with Schedule Performance Index (SPI)?
16
Conceptual FrameworkDAU Webcast
17
Conceptual FrameworkDAU Webcast
Unraveling the scenario…
Pre-Crisis [would have been]• Stable operating environment with CPI
and SPI near 1.0• Two WBS elements
• Control Accounts, WPs,…• Easily extensible model
Crisis• WBS elements are assumed to be wholly
unproductive during all or some of the crisis period
• May affect different elements differently
Post-Crisis• WBS elements are assumed to transition
to partially productive as some point• For sake of simplicity, no amelioration for
duration of task
Ground Truth – The Virtue of Conceptual Models
FlexFiles
• Time-phased monthly data• Burn rate increases ca. Sep 2020
• WBS1 $105K/mo $118K/mo• WBS2 $222K/mo $248K/mo
• No insight into progress (EV)
DAU Webcast
18
RECOMMENDED REMARKS / TAGS
• “WBS1 was severely impacted from Mar to Aug 2020, inclusive”• “WBS2 was severely impacted from Apr to July 2020, inclusive”• “WBS1 was moderately impacted from Sep 2020 to task
completion in Jan 2021”• “WBS2 was moderately impacted from August 2020 to task
completion in May 2021”
• DD 1921 (annual reports)o Report-level and WBS-level Remarks
• IPMDARo Report-level and WBS-level Format 5 Variance Reports,
allow for more detailed/nuanced explanations• FlexFiles
o Unlike Remarks, which have to be manually “extracted,” new tags and Additional Data Fields can be pivoted to more easily isolate and analyze data
PRE-DECISIONAL
Phase Data Type WBS1 WBS2baseline start date 07/01/19 01/01/20baseline duration (mo) 12 12baseline finish date 07/01/20 01/01/21baseline BAC ($) $1.2M $2.4Mbaseline burn rate ($/mo) $0.1M $0.2Mbaseline SPI 1.00 1.00pre-crisis duration (mo) 12 12pre-crisis burn rate ($/mo) $0.1M $0.2Mpre-crisis EAC (CPI) $1.3M $2.7Mcrisis disruption start 03/01/20 04/01/20crisis time elapsed (mo) 8 3crisis stop work duration (mo) 6 4disruption cost efficiency 80% 85%disruption schedule efficiency 90% 95%
19
CCDR Specifics – Cost Structures
• Direct and Indirect Costso “Would Have Been” Cost (can be estimated, not known)o With COVID-19 Impacts Cost
DAU Webcast
Direct1
Direct2
Directn
WBS1
WBS2
WBSn
OH1
OH2
OHn
Direct1
Direct2
Directn
WBS1
WBS2
WBSn
+
+
+
OH1 +
OH2 +
OHn +
Direct1
Direct2
Directn
WBS1
WBS2
WBSn
OH1
OH2
OHn
WBSn+1 + + + + + +
Not recommended!
Post-Crisis (2 methods)
Method 1 (costs distributed to applicable
WBS elements)
Method 2 (new WBS elements capturing
impacts)
Pre-Crisis
Most Direct Costs likely not separable
+ + +
Most Indirect Costs likely separable
20
CCDR Specifics – Scenarios and Impacts (Examples)DAU Webcast
Example Scenario Impact
Total Labor Hours
Direct Labor Rate
Overhead Rate
MaterialCosts
Touch Labor SEPM
QuantityInfo
Temporary closures or furlough
Production sequence interrupted X X X
Period of performanceextended X X
Supply chain delays X X
Loss of learning X X
Direct/fringe rates increase X
Plant reconfiguration, increased security andhealth measures
Out-of-sequence work X X
Overhead increase X
Loss of learning X X
Components of Cost
It is possible to “opt in” to FlexFiles if it makes COVID-19 reporting easier!21
CCDR Specifics – Reporting MechanismsDAU Webcast
Remarks (minimum requirement)All formats• Contractor, at a minimum, can provide detailed remarks describing the type and timing of all impacts• More general impacts can be described in the Summary Remarks• If an impact is specific to certain WBS Elements or Functional Elements, then those can be described in the WBS Element Remarks (present in the 1921-1,
FlexFile, and Quantity Data Report only) • Other comments can include explaining the use of new charge codes, work packages, control accounts, pricing categories, or other methods to explicitly
capture impacts as a result of COVID-19
Including New WBS Elements in the ReportFlexFile/Quantity Data Report and Legacy 1921 Forms• It could make sense to include a new WBS Element to segregate types of cost as a result of certain impacts (e.g., CARES Act Section 3610)• Would require a Plan Revision and potentially a contract mod
Including New Tags in the ReportFlexFile and new 1921-3 only• If a contractor uses a new charge code, work package, control account, pricing category (direct or overhead), etc., to track impacts then these new tags should
appear in the FlexFile or 1921-3• If the contractor is reporting a FlexFile, the new charge codes, control accounts, etc., will appear in the Account data field, depending on what they are using
to satisfy that requirement• Same applies to new pricing categories with the Functional Category and Functional Overhead Category data fields• The new 1921-3 format allows for inclusion of contractor specific categories so any new pricing categories established should be included in the report
Including New Data Fields in the ReportFlexFile Only• If a contractor establishes a new data field in their systems to track impacts, then this can be added to the FlexFile as an Additional Data Field #1-#12• Would require a Plan Revision and potentially a contract mod
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE
FlexFiles Overview & Status
23
24
Flex
File
/Qua
ntity
Dat
a Re
port
From five DIDs to two
CWBS Index and Dictionary
1921: Cost Data Summary Report
1921-1: Functional Cost-Hour Report
1921-2: Progress Curve Report
1921-5: Sustainment Functional Cost-Hour Report
From Five DIDs to Two
25
Data Group BDD Form 2794 Data ElementsWBS ElementOrder/LotEnd Item
Data Group AReport MetadataApproved Plan NumberSubmission EventPeriod of PerformanceReporting OrganizationAs of DateDate Preparedmore in the DID…
Data Group CDefinitions and RemarksWBS Element DefinitionsRemarks by WBS ElementSummary Remarks
Data Group EActuals To Date (ATD)AccountReporting PeriodCLINNonrecurring or RecurringFunctional Category / OverheadStandard Functional CategoryUnit/SublotWBS ElementOrder/Lot and End ItemATD (Dollars and Labor Hours)
Data Group DSummary ElementsOrder/LotSubtotalGeneral and AdministrativeUndistributed BudgetManagement ReserveFacilities Capital Cost of MoneyContract FeeContract Price
Data Group FAllocation MethodologyAllocation Method
Data Group GForecasts At Completion (FAC)FAC (Dollars)FAC (Labor Hours)
Legacy Element
The core of the FlexFile is providing dollars and hours at the account level in contractornative categories, time phased.
Insight into contractor’s native Functional Categories
Account level reporting at or below the WBS
Data time-phased monthly or to align with contractor’s financial calendar
Continuity with prior reports by requiring the legacy government tags
Greatest value to cost estimator, in many cases, will be the additional insight requested in Group E
FlexFile Data Groups
FlexFile Submission Options
26
Contractor submits the FlexFile and Quantity Data Report in their own format, so long as it adheres to the DID and approved CSDR Plan
Contractor submits the FlexFile and Quantity Data Report utilizing an Excel template that mirrors the File Format Specifications (FFS)*
Contractor submits the FlexFile and Quantity Data Report in the data model according to the File Format Specifications (FFS)
Contractor has three options to submit the data in….
The following documents provide additional details regarding the submission mechanisms and processes
FlexFile and Quantity Data Report DIDs Implementation Guide Date Exchange Instructions (DEI) File Format Specifications (FFS) Excel-Compatible File Guidance New DD Form 2794 Format
All documents can be found at…https://cade.osd.mil/policy/flexfile
*Same options apply to the Quantity Data Report, except there is only a one part template, as opposed to three.
27
Contractor is ready to submit
Finalized*
SR Validation
*Unless another iteration is necessary
Ingested in Submit Review Data Gymnastics
Contractor submits report regardless of file type and receives receipt of submission
CWIPT can provide feedback at any point after the contractor submits
Submission will follow the normal workflow if submitted using the JSON Data Model or Three Part Template
If the file is submitted in Contractor Format, then additional time will be allotted to ensure that...o File is compliant with the DID and approved CSDR Plano File can be organized into the JSON Data Model
CWIPT will receive notification from DCARC once the contractor formatted file is organized in the JSON Data Model
DCARC Only
actions performedcPet or SR Conversion
Contractor uploads file
FlexFile Submission Workflow
28
Equal Distribution Between Template and Contractor Format
29
Air Force Programs Have Provided the Most FlexFiles
30
FlexFile CADE Exports
FlexFile Pivot ExportFlatfile of the FlexFile actual dollars and hours according to Data Group E
FlexFile Template ExportExcel version of the data model structure outlined by the FFS
Formatted and Flat File 1921Equivalent of the 1921 DD Form and 1921 flatfile
JSON Data ModelAccording to the FFS
Contractor Submitted Files*Three Part Template, Contractor Format, or similar structure
Validation Error ReportDocument used to communicate CWIPT feedback to the contractor
DCARC DocumentationDescription of how DCARC interpreted Contractor Format submission
31
130 Additional FlexFiles Expected This Year
Nearly 250 CSDR plans with FlexFile reporting have been approved
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE
24 June 2020
Data & Analytics Demo
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE
TrainingOpportunities
34
2020 Training Events | CADE LearnCADE Training and Community Engagement Overview
https://cade.bridgeapp.com
Bridge Learning Management System
Current CADE Learn Library (33 Courses)CADE 101- Fundamentals of CADE› CSDR Policy, CSDR Reporting Forms, Sustainment› Validations , Portal Navigations: Data & Analytics
CADE 201- Intermediate CADE Skills › -CSDR/ FlexFile Data Utility, Using CSDR Data for Credible Estimates
-SRDR Download (Browse CSDR Submissions) - 1921/ FF Comparison - Advanced FlexFile Analysis -Analyze FlexFile across multiple programs
FlexFile 101- The Future of Cost Reporting › FlexFile Policy, Submission Process, IT Solutions, DILO Scenario
CADE for Project Managers › Insight into Contracting Fee, Utility of SAR Data, CSDR Compliance,
Affordability Analysis, DILO Scenario
CADE For Contracting Officers › Value of Certified Cost & Pricing Data in CADE, CDRL Process, RFP
Identification, DFARS, Other Than Cost & Pricing Data, DILO
CADE For Submitters › Submitter Guide, Creating Cost Reports using cPet, CSDR Submissions ,
Program Planning Module
Programs in Review/Development (10+ Courses)CADE 301- Other CADE Initiatives (Tech Data , -M/R)
Regional Training/ Community Engagement
Regional Training Series Events**REGIONAL TRAINING MID-ATLANTIC› DAU L@L Series| FlexFile Overview/Update| WebEx Broadcast| 24 June 2020› NAVAIR (PEO U&W, T)| CADE 201 | Pax River, MD|21-22 July 2020› AFCAA| CADE 201 |Andrews, MD| 23 July 2020› CECOM (PEOs)| CADE 201| Aberdeen, MD|9 September 2020› DASA-CE/USMC/NAVSEA| CADE 201|Fort Belvoir, VA| 30 September 2020
REGIONAL TRAINING NORTHEAST› AFLCMC Hanscom| CADE 201| Boston, MA|5 November 2020› NAVSUP/NAVAIR/ Boeing |CADE 201| Philadelphia, PA|25 September 2020› Industry | Red Critical Program Office Visits| TBD| TBD 2020› DCMA/ PEOSs| KOs/CADE 201 | Chester, VA/Norfolk, VA | TBD Dec 2020
REGIONAL TRAINING SOUTH› AMCOM (PEOs), MDA| CADE 201| Huntsville, AL|4 August 2020› AFLCMC WRAFB| CADE 201| Robins AFB, GA| 5 August 2020*› AFLCMC Eglin/Industry | Eglin AFB, FL| 6 August 2020› Industry | Red Critical Program Office Visits| FL| TBD 2020
REGIONAL TRAINING WEST› Naval Postgraduate School |CADE & FlexFile 101| Zoom, CA| 15 April 2020› AFLCMC| CADE 201 | Hill AFB, UT|25 August 2020› SMC| CADE 201 | Los Angeles, CA|26 August 2020› SPAWAR| CADE 201| San Diego, CA|27 August 2020› Industry | Program Office/industry Visits| TX| TBD October 2020
REGIONAL TRAINING MIDWEST› AFLCMC WP | CADE 201 | Dayton, OH|22 September 2020› TACOM | CADE 201 | Detroit, MI|23 September 2020
Community Engagement Events**› MORS Cost Analysis Workshop| CADE & FlexFile Update| Arlington, VA | 25-27 Feb 2020› MORS Symposium | CADE & FlexFile Update | New London, CT | 15-19 June 2020*› AIA Cost Principles Meeting | CADE & FlexFile Update| TBD| TBD September 2020*› CADE FOCUS GROUP| CADE & FlexFile Update| Arlington, VA| 20-21 October 2020› Government Contracting Symposium| CADE for KOs | Washington, D.C | TBD 2020*› * Tentative Events ** Excludes Monthly Telecons/Other 1-on-1 Industry Events
35
All documents can be found athttps://cade.osd.mil/policy/flexfile/
FlexFile and Quantity Data Report DIDs Implementation Guide Date Exchange Instructions (DEI) File Format Specifications (FFS) New DD Form 2794 Format Draft CDRL Language
See https://cade.osd.mil/support for training material and information on upcoming training events
CDSG/DCARC DirectorMr. Kelly [email protected](703) 614-5397
DCARC LeadMr. Brian [email protected](571) 372-4259
Training & Outreach LeadMr. Torri [email protected](571) 372-4270
FlexFile LeadMr. Marc [email protected](703) 697-0362
Points of Contact
Important Documents and POCsFlexFile 101
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE
Back Up
Update to DoDI 5000.73MAJOR CAPABILITY ACQUISITION• CAPE conducts or approves independent cost estimates (ICEs) for MDAPs and major subprograms prior to: Milestone A Milestone B Low rate initial production Full rate production At any other time considered appropriate by DCAPE Upon the request of USD(A&S) or the milestone decision authority
• CAPE may conduct or approve an ICE or cost analysis to inform the Development Request for Proposal Release Decision Point
• At the discretion of DCAPE or upon the request of the Secretary of the Military Department, CAPE conducts or approves ICEs for sustainment reviews
• CAPE conducts independent cost analysis for certifications following critical Nunn-McCurdy breaches
• CAPE conducts a preliminary cost analysis and final cost analysis for multiyear procurement contracts
37
2020 Update to DoDI 5000.73
MIDDLE TIER OF ACQUISITION
• Rapid Prototyping Programs CAPE or Service Cost Agency (SCA) conducts life-cycle cost estimates for
programs likely to exceed acquisition category (ACAT) I thresholds Estimates for programs that do not exceed the ACAT I threshold must be
conducted in accordance with guidance issued by the relevant SCA
• Rapid Fielding Programs CAPE or the SCA conducts life-cycle cost estimates for programs likely to
exceed ACAT I or II thresholds DoD Components must conduct life cycle cost estimates for rapid fielding
programs that do not exceed the ACAT II threshold in accordance with guidance issued by the relevant SCA
38
Update to DoDI 5000.732020 Update to DoDI 5000.73
SOFTWARE
• CAPE or the SCA must conduct an ICE for programs likely to exceed ACAT I or II thresholds prior to the program entering the execution phase
• The ICE may be updated during the execution phase• Estimates for programs that do not exceed ACAT II thresholds must be conducted
in accordance with the policies and procedures issued by the SCA
DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS
• CAPE may conduct a cost estimate for defense business systems• For all other defense business systems, the SCA or designated organization will
conduct cost analyses in accordance with guidance issued by the SCA
CONTRACTED SERVICES
• CAPE may conduct a cost estimate for acquisition of a contracted service• All other cost estimates for contracted services must be conducted in accordance
with the policies and procedures issued by the SCA
39
Update to DoDI 5000.732020 Update to DoDI 5000.73
Department Addressing COVID-19
Defense Pricing and Contracting (DPC)• DPC has issued a number of memoranda in response to COVID-19• Most notably:
• [09 Apr] Implementation guidance for Section 3610 of the CARES Act – how to recover costs via requests for equitable adjustment (REA) by contract type (Fixed Price, Cost Plus, T&M)
• [06 Apr] Change to the Delegation of Authority for Use of Other Transactions for Prototype Projects in Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019
• [30 Mar] Managing Defense Contracts Impacts of the Novel Coronavirus – addresses equitable adjustments as a response to contract impacts caused by COVID-19
• https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pacc/cc/COVID-19.html
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act• SECTION 3610, FEDERAL CONTRACTOR AUTHORITY• States that funds from this or any other Act can be used to “modify the terms and conditions of a
contract…to reimburse at the minimum applicable contract billing rates not to exceed an average of 40 hours per week any paid leave, including sick leave, a contract provides to keep its employees or subcontractors in a ready state…”
Data-Driven Estimating OS4703 Applied Cost Analysis
40Untangling COVID-19 impacts will be a significant effort going forward
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE
24 June 2020
Data & Analytics Overview
Data and Analytics RedesignCADE Data & Analytics Overview
• A new design for the Data and Analytics home page was published on 05 Dec 2018• It is intended to better support two primary modes of accessing data
• Browse Data Across Programs: Aggregate data from multiple Tasks/Contracts/Programs
• Think “analysis-ready flat files”
• Data by Program: Drill-down by Program, Contract, and Task• Think “standard reporting formats”
The Artist Formerly Known As Cross-Program Query has been appropriately
renamed
42
Multiple CSDRs – Flexible SearchCADE Data & Analytics Overview
• The Browse CSDR Submissions function provides a more flexible “DACIMS-like” search/browse
• Simultaneously locate and download multiple CSDRs• Works with any mix of Contractor Cost Data Reports
(CCDRs) and Software Resources Data Reports (SRDRs)
• Access to all contract-specific 1921-series forms• CDSR (1921), FCHR (1921-1), PCR (1921-2),
Sustainment FCHR (1921-5)• Includes FlexFiles!
• CCDRs are available as both “formatted” and flat file downloads
43
Choose Browse CSDR Submissions from the Data and Analytics home page…
…or from the Data menu
Browse CSDR Submissions DetailsCADE Data & Analytics Overview
Apply filters to narrow down search, including Report Type
44
Use Report Type to select CCDR or SRDR…
Running tally of Reports that match
filter criteria
Specify whether to include non-flat-file-exportable reports
…then use Report Type column header to
isolate specific types (e.g., FlexFile, SRDR
Initial)
45
Data Access – CSDR-SRCADE 201
Export Excel Data Model TemplateFlexFile data provided in Excel data model structure
Export Pivot DataActual dollars and labor hours according to the data elements in Data Group E of the approved FlexFile DID
Formatted File ExportExcel version of formatted 1921 DD Form
Export to Excel Excel flat file with Metadata, Remarks, and Definitions equivalent to that provided in the 1921 DD Form
An analyst can access a FlexFile in the CSDR-SR in four primary ways…
1
2
3
4
3
2
4
1
46
Retrieving FlexFilesCADE 201
Step 1: Navigate to the FlexFile submission. File submitted in JSON. To pull the file go to the Validation tab
Step 2: At the bottom of this page under Validate: Review Results you will have the options to download the FlexFile Excel Template or FlexFile Pivot Data
Step 3: Downloaded files will be stored under My CSDR -> Retrieve Files
47
Data Access – Data and AnalyticsImplementation Overview
FlexFiles can be accessed using the Browse CSDR Submissions feature in Data & AnalyticsUtilize filters to narrow search results > select submission event.
CADE 201
FlexFile Exports
FlexFile Pivot Export flattens (de-normalizes) the structured data in the FlexFile• Supports filtering & pivot table
creation• Repeat values on every row (de-
normalized)• Requires familiarity to source/intent of
specific columns
FlexFile Template Export • FlexFile data provided in Excel data
model structure
48
CADE 201
FlexFile ExportsFlexFile Pivot Export will produce a zip file containing FF Pivot Data Export & New Pivot Table Template
• Excel workbook “shell” containing pre-formatted pivot tables • Configured with an “External Data Connection” that can point to a FF CSV File
FlexFile Example File Is 215,000 Rows; Refresh Time Approximately 15 SecondsPivot Data is typically very large; may not fit in excel 49
Data and Analytics Landing PageCADE Data & Analytics Overview
50
Drill-down by Program, Contract & Task
Aggregated data from multiple Tasks/Contracts/Programs
• A new design for the Data and Analytics home page was published on 05 Dec 2018
• It is intended to better support two primary modes of accessing data
• Browse Data Across Programs: Aggregate data from multiple Tasks/Contracts/Programs
• Think “analysis-ready flat files”
• Data by Program: Drill-down by Program, Contract, and Task
• Think “standard reporting formats”
Multiple CSDRs – Flexible SearchCADE Data & Analytics Overview
• The Browse CSDR Submissions function provides a more flexible “DACIMS-like” search/browse
• Simultaneously locate and download multiple CSDRs
• Works with any mix of Contractor Cost Data Reports (CCDRs) and Software Resources Data Reports (SRDRs)
• Access to all contract-specific 1921-series forms• CDSR (1921), FCHR (1921-1), PCR (1921-2),
Sustainment FCHR (1921-5)• Includes FlexFiles!
• CCDRs are available as both “formatted” and flat file downloads
51
Choose Browse CSDR Submissions from the Data and Analytics home page…
…or from the Data menu
Browse CSDR SubmissionsCADE Data & Analytics Overview
• Apply filters to narrow down search
52
Running tally of Submissions that
match filter criteria
Use Report Type to select CCDR, SRDR or CWBS Dictionary
Specify whether to apply search results to WBS elements; Include/exclude Legacy (non-flat-file-exportable submissions)
Enter any keyword or keyword combination (FlexFile, PMP (i.e., radar))
Export submission metadata and download native files
Browse CSDR Submissions Details PageCADE Data & Analytics Overview
53
Export native files
Download FlexFile Pivot & Excel Template Export (excel data model
structure) from Retrieve Files
Download excel version of formatted 1921 & flat file export
(metadata, remarks & definitions)
Bulk download submission files
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Default screen is Favorites(shown) or Search Programs (if
no Favorites selected yet) or Dashboard (if exactly one
Favorite)
Choose Search Cross-Program Data (aka Cross-
Program Query)
54
Step 1: Cross-Program Query
CADE 201
Cross-Program QueryRecommend using Chrome or
Edge to access FACADE! Certain locations block the fonts needed
for it to render properly
Favorite blue stars are not visible, though the toggle functionality is still there Data Availability green
checkmarks and red Xs are not visible
55
Step 1: Known Font Issues
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Displays total number of CCDRs
in FACADE
Initially, no Filters have yet been applied
Choose Edit/Run
56
Step 2: Start Query
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Check all desired options for given filter
Choose any of various filters from the Add
Filter drop-down
57
Step 3: Initial Filter
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Number of CCDRs included decreases
based on filter
First filter now identified in table
Choose an additional filter from remaining choices on the Add
Filter drop-down and check the desired
options
58
Step 4: Initial Filter Results
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Number of CCDRs included further
reduced
Additional filter now identified in table
Choices for each new filter based on
cumulative effect of previous filters – order
matters!
Step 5: Final Filter
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Final filter now identified in table
Click Run to generate
filter results
Results table shows metadata for all
reports identified
60
Step 6: Run Query
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Use Include All and Exclude All to toggle
reports en masse
61
Step 7: Manual Down-Select
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Select or de-select individual reports by
clicking in the leftmost column
Click Export once reports are selected
62
Step 7: Manual Down-Select
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Click Export
Select Functional Cost and Hours (“mash-up” of
1921 and 1921-1 data) and Progress Curve(1921-2), if available
Give Export a name
(required)
Pop-up shows Export options
63
Step 8: Export
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Click OK to confirm export
64
Step 8: Export
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Choose Save…
…and click Save
…name query…
Query now shows by name
65
Step 9: Save Query
CADE 201
Cross-Program QueryClick on RETRIEVE
FILES
Click Refresh Status of Files if needed, until
Current Status column shows Finished
Click to download
Save and Extractzip file
Open Excel file and Enable Editing
66
Step 10: Retrieve Export
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Click DATA – Filter to apply filter
67
Step 11: Flat File
CADE 201
Cross-Program Query
Use WBS Element Concatenate field filter to select desired element(s)
Filtering for At Completion and
Recurring further reduces number of rows
Filter status shows reduction in number of
rows (records)
Unit of Measure can be used to isolate Quantity, Cost (TY $K), and Hours
68
Step 12: Excel Filter
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE
Bridge: CADE’s Learning Management System
Why Use Bridge? (https://cade.bridgeapp.com)Bridge Learning Management System
• Online Learningo Bridge allows you to take full
CADE Training programs from your computer or mobile device wherever you are
• Live Trainingo Sign up for live training events,
access course materials, and participate in class activities
• Resourceso A variety of resources to help you
with all your CADE needs
What Full Courses Are Available?Bridge Learning Management System
CADE 201 coming soon!
Ready To Get Started?Bridge Learning Management System
• Log In at https://cade.bridgeapp.com
• Need Help Logging In?o Contact Jack Titus at
[email protected] or Ryan Horn at [email protected]
• Need An Account?o Sign up at
https://cade.osd.mil/support